improving gnss for future natural disaster reduction

31
Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction: Earthquakes & Tsunamis Earthquakes & Tsunamis Kenneth W. Hudnut Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey U. S. Geological Survey GNSS Science & Technology Applications ICG-3 December 9, 2008 Pasadena, California GPS site & photo by J. Galetzka Muloh, Sumatra

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jun-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction:Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction:

Earthquakes & TsunamisEarthquakes & TsunamisKenneth W. HudnutKenneth W. Hudnut

U. S. Geological SurveyU. S. Geological Survey

GNSS Science & Technology Applications

ICG-3

December 9, 2008Pasadena, California

GPS site & photoby J. GaletzkaMuloh, Sumatra

Page 2: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

May 1900 April 1906

Photos courtesy Carol Prentice, USGS

San Francisco - 5:12 AM on April 18, 1906San Francisco - 5:12 AM on April 18, 1906……

3000 people were killed; 225,000 of the 400,000 living in San Francisco were left homeless. Much of the city was in ruins.

Page 3: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

December 26, 2004 Sumatra-AndamanDecember 26, 2004 Sumatra-Andamanearthquake and Indian Ocean Tsunamiearthquake and Indian Ocean Tsunami

Page 4: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Earthquakesare a globalproblem

Page 5: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

4

2

5

3

1

1600 1700 1800 1900 2000

Population(billions)

Cumulative number ofearthquake

fatalities(millions)

Earthquake Fatalities andEarthquake Fatalities andPopulation GrowthPopulation Growth

Courtesy of Prof. Roger Bilham(University of Colorado)

Page 6: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

GNSS timing for precise earthquake locationGNSS timing for precise earthquake locationworldwide - also vital for tsunami alertsworldwide - also vital for tsunami alerts

Page 7: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Courtesy of Prof. Tanya Atwater, UCSB

Page 8: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Courtesy of Prof. Tanya Atwater, UCSB

Page 9: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

San Andreas faultSan Andreas fault• 35 mm/yr slip rate;

• >70% of plate motion• 1685, 1812, 1857 eq’s

• Big Bend compression• 1971 Sylmar (M 6.7)• 1994 Northridge (M 6.7)

• California is now veryheavily ‘wired’ with manyGPS stations

• GPS measures plate motionstrain accumulation andlarge earthquakedisplacements

• ‘Natural laboratory’ to studyfuture ‘Big Ones’

• B4 - Imaged by airborneLiDAR - GPS was crucial!

Page 10: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction
Page 11: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

ReidReid’’s theory of s theory of ““Elastic ReboundElastic Rebound””

Triangulation networks wereresurveyed in the 15 months followingthe 1906 earthquake.

H. F. Reid

Page 12: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Mt. DiabloMt. Diablo

Surveyors measure the location of mountain peaksSurveyors measure the location of mountain peaks

Mt. Diablo

Pre-earthquake Post earthquake

Clayton

Mt. Hamilton Loma Prieta

Grizzly Peak

Page 13: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

GPS network measures platetectonic motions to anaccuracy of better than1 mm/yr

We can see whether themotion is ʻslow and steady,ʼor perhaps more interestinglyit may sometimes accelerateor decelerate

Page 14: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction
Page 15: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction
Page 16: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

San Andreas - place two betsSan Andreas - place two betsboth ~120 km from Los Angeles (LA)both ~120 km from Los Angeles (LA)

Coachella Valleysegment is ~60 kmto San Bernardino

Page 17: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction
Page 18: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Lone Juniper Ranch and Frazier Park High SchoolLone Juniper Ranch and Frazier Park High School

Prototype GPS fault slip sensor; up to 10 Hz

Spans the SanAndreas faultnear Gorman,California

Page 19: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

"Good science, when applied in the way that the people of Alaska have"Good science, when applied in the way that the people of Alaska havedone, made the difference between an emergency and a tragedy."done, made the difference between an emergency and a tragedy."

Charles Charles GroatGroat, Director, United States Geological Survey, Director, United States Geological Survey

Each day, the Trans-Alaska oil pipeline carries one million barrels ofEach day, the Trans-Alaska oil pipeline carries one million barrels ofoil, about 17% of the domestic oil supply for the United States, valuedoil, about 17% of the domestic oil supply for the United States, valued

at about $25 million. If the pipeline had ruptured during the 2002 Denaliat about $25 million. If the pipeline had ruptured during the 2002 Denaliearthquake, the lost revenue and cost of repair and environmentalearthquake, the lost revenue and cost of repair and environmental

cleanup would have been incalculable.cleanup would have been incalculable.

Page 20: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

San Andreas - instrumentSan Andreas - instrument majormajorlifeline infrastructure crossingslifeline infrastructure crossings

Page 21: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Cajon Pass I-15 Fault CrossingCajon Pass I-15 Fault Crossing

Page 22: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Earthquake Early WarningEarthquake Early Warning

Page 23: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Tangshan, China1976 - M 7.5255,000people died(official)

Northridge, CA1994 - it canhappen here

Turkey 1999

Page 24: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Pre-earthquake:

Reference static displacementReference static rotationMean and variance of dynamic characteristics

During earthquake:

Changes in dynamic characteristicsHysteretic behaviorDamage initiation

Post-earthquake:

Permanent static displacementPermanent static rotationMean and variance of dynamic characteristics

Multiple sensor package:• Acceleration / Velocity• Displacement (GPS)• Rotation (tilt-meter)

AUTOMATED TAGGING AND REAL-TIME DAMAGE DISTRIBUTION MAPS

LinearNonlinear

Permanentdisplacement

FRC.

DISP.

Automated Tagging and Real-Time Damage Distribution Maps

Page 25: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

•Satellite

•Telemetry

•Internet

SENSOR PACKAGE

-Accelerometer

-Tiltmeter

-GPS sensor

REAL-TIME DAMAGE ASSESSMENT

Courtesy ofErdal Safak (USGS)

Page 26: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction
Page 27: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Caltech Tectonic Observatory GPS Array: SuGArUSAID funds to upgrade to real-time GNSS

On-land GPS

stations are

essential for

real-time

detection of

large slip:

Blewitt et al.

(GRL, 2006)

Page 28: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

GNSS buoy systemsGNSS buoy systems NOAA DART buoys are expensive

and require regular maintenance GPS buoys developed by GFZ and

Univ. Tokyo groups GPS can be used for large numbers

of low-cost buoys to complementexisting system

NavCom-AXYS contract for USNavy (NAVOCEANO);2 cm inshore, 10 cm offshore

NOAA-USGS testing program forwarning application (MBARI)

Tie in with existing earthquakeand weather monitoring andalerts

Page 29: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Padang Padang -- what to do?what to do?

Photo by John GaletzkaCaltech Tectonic Observatory

Page 30: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

Photo by John GaletzkaCaltech Tectonic Observatory

Inexpensive package of GPS/INS can be added (after R&D and testing)to existing NOAA buoys offshore of So. Calif. to complement otherInstrumentation for earthquake and tsunami early warning systems

SoCal - What to do?

Page 31: Improving GNSS for Future Natural Disaster Reduction

GNSS Benefiting Humanity:GNSS Benefiting Humanity:Earthquake and Tsunami safetyEarthquake and Tsunami safety

Global earthquake observation and tsunami alerts (ANSS) Airborne imagery positioning for fault zone characterization and damage assessment (B4) Tracking plates and strain accumulation and release (PBO) Earthquake early warning & rapid slip observation at lifeline fault crossings (Gorman SAF) Building monitoring and damage assessment; automatic ‘tagging’ (Factor Building) Fault displacement (SuGAr) and tsunami buoy measurement (MBARI)

GNSS will become even better than it is currently for these applications:– GPS L2C, L5 and L1C will improve over current capabilities (e.g., tri-laning)– GLONASS, QZSS, Galileo and other GNSS will help (e.g., increased coverage)

GNSS could be improved beyond currently planned system enhancements:– Aiding through internet or wireless will enhance real-time precise results– Added signals could nearly eliminate the real-time ambiguity resolution problem