improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage i...

18
Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas to predict relapse during surveillance after orchiectomy João Lobo Hans Stoop, Ad Gillis, Leendert HJ Looijenga, J. Wolter Oosterhuis No conflicts of interest 8 th September 2019

Upload: others

Post on 26-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

to predict relapse during surveillance after orchiectomy

João Lobo

Hans Stoop, Ad Gillis, Leendert HJ Looijenga, J. Wolter Oosterhuis

No conflicts of interest8th September 2019

Page 2: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Lobo et al. Hum Pathol 2018TGC

Ts:

het

ero

gen

eity

& c

ha

llen

ges

Page 3: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Lobo et al. Int J Mol Sci 2019TGC

Ts:

het

ero

gen

eity

& c

ha

llen

ges “Germ cell tumors are at the crossroads between

developmental biology and cancer"

Page 4: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

1% male cancer

Decreasing mortality

Most curable solid neoplasms

Same cytogenetic background (i12p) and low mutational burden

Most common cancer in Caucasian men 15—44yo

Rising incidence

15-20% disseminated disease recurs (poor prognosis)

Cisplatin resistance

Iatrogeny (young patients)

Better disease biomarkers urgently neededW

hy

focu

sin

g o

n T

GC

Ts?

Page 5: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

1% male cancer

Decreasing mortality

Most curable solid neoplasms

Same cytogenetic background (i12p) and low mutational burden

Most common cancer in Caucasian men 15—44yo

Rising incidence

15-20% disseminated disease recurs (poor prognosis)

Cisplatin resistance

Iatrogeny (young patients)

Better disease biomarkers needed

Wh

y fo

cusi

ng

on

TG

CTs

?

Costa and Lobo et al. Epigenomics 2017

Page 6: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Va

scu

lar

inva

sio

na

s a

bio

ma

rker

Prognostic marker

Metastases, recurrence

TNM (pT2, stage IA)

Patient stratification

Inter-observer agreement in reporting

Not ideal

Most common disagreement upon centralized review

Subjectivity, artifacts, criteria…

Immunohistochemistry and type of vessel

No formal recommendation (ISUP)

Lack of data

Page 7: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Aim

sa

nd

Met

ho

do

log

y

1

• Inter-observer agreement in VI scoring on H&E

2

• Additional value of adding IHC for vascular markers

3

• Additional value of characterizing the type of vessel invaded

“Clean” cohort

Strict inclusion criteria

H&E + IHC panel (D2-40, CD31, FVIII)

Scoring by 3 independent

observers

✓ Consecutively diagnosed NS patients✓ Stage I✓ Only surveillance after orchiectomy

✓ 2 FFPE samples✓ >1cm2 tumor✓ Tumor-parenchyma interface

✓ Dedicated to TGCT pathology

✓ D2-40: lymph vessels✓ CD31, FVIII: blood vessels

Page 8: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Co

ho

rtch

ara

cter

iza

tio

nVariables

Patient cohort

(n=52)Age [years (median, IQR)] 31 (24-35)Laterality (n, %)

Right 21/52 (40.4)Left 31/52 (59.6)

Pre-operative serum tumor markers

(n, %)Within normal range 20/52 (38.5)Elevated 32/52 (61.5)

Histologic subtypes (n, %)Pure embryonal carcinoma 5/52 (9.6)Pure postpubertal-type teratoma 2/52 (3.8)Mixed tumor, without seminoma 21/52 (40.4)Mixed tumor, with seminoma 24/52 (46.2)

Multifocality (n, %)Absent 50/52 (96.2)Present 2/52 (3.8)

Largest tumor size [cm (median, IQR)] 3.5 (2.5-5.4)Rete testis invasion (n, %)

Absent 30/42 (71.4)Present, stromal 9/42 (21.4)Only pagetoid spread of GCNIS 3/42 (7.1)

Vascular invasion (n, %)Absent 25/50 (50.0)Present 25/50 (50.0)

VariablesPatient cohort

(n=52)Relapse (n, %)

No 21/52 (40.4)Yes 31/52 (59.6)

Type of relapse (n, %)Early 28/31 (90.3)Late 3/31 (9.7)

Site of relapse (n, %)Only serum markers 6/31 (19.4)Serum markers + PAoLN 14/31 (45.2)Only PAoLN 4/31 (12.9)Only Lung 2/31 (6.5)Serum markers + Lung + PAoLN 4/31 (12.9)Serum markers + Liver + Lung + PAoLN 1/31 (3.2)

Treatment performed for relapses (n, %)Only chemotherapy 26/31 (83.9)Chemotherapy + RPLND 5/31 (16.1)

Vital status at last follow-up (n, %)A-NED 50/52 (96.2)D-NED 1/52 (1.9)DFD 1/52 (1.9)

Page 9: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Pro

gn

ost

icva

lue

On multivariable analysis (age, tumor size, serum tumor markers, rete testis invasion)

VI showed an independent impact in predicting disease relapse

(HR 3.163, 95% CI 1.31-7.63)

Page 10: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Inte

r-o

bse

rver

ag

reem

ent

Testicular germ cell tumor-dedicated pathologists’ assessment of vascular invasion

Agreement

Cohen’s Kappa = 0.54 (p<0.001)

Pathologist 3

Absent Present

Pathologist 1

Absent 23 4

Present 8 17

Agreement

Cohen’s Kappa = 0.50 (p<0.001)

Pathologist 2

Absent Present

Pathologist 1

Absent 22 5

Present 8 17

Agreement

Cohen’s Kappa = 0.49 (p<0.001)

Pathologist 2

Absent Present

Pathologist 3

Absent 24 7

Present 6 15

Agreement among TGCT-dedicated pathologists was moderate, as

reported(κ 0.49-0.54)

Page 11: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Per

form

an

ce in

pre

dic

tin

gre

lap

se

Vascular invasion

scoring

Sensitivity

(%)

Specificity

(%)

PPV

(%)

NPV

(%)

Accuracy

(%)

H&E (consensus) 61.3 85.7 86.4 60.0 71.2

Immunohistochemistry

(D2-40 + FVIII +

CD31)

71.0 71.4 78.6 62.5 71.2

IHC resulted in increase in sensitivity and decrease in

specificity

IHC upgraded 8 cases of “absent VI on H&E” → 3 of them developed

relapseIHC downgraded 2 cases of

“present VI on H&E” → both did not develop relapse

Page 12: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Va

scu

lar

inva

sio

n:

cha

llen

ges

Mis

sed

ca

ses

on

H&

E a

sses

smen

t

Va

scu

lar

inva

sio

n m

imic

kers

H&E

D2-40

CD31

FVIII

H&E

D2-40

CD31

FVIII

Page 13: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Typ

eo

fve

ssel

Vascular invasion scoring No relapse (n) Relapse (n)

IHC showing LVI only 3 12

IHC showing BVI only 3 2

IHC showing LVI + BVI 0 8

“Double vascular invasion patients”: 100% accuracy in predicting disease

relapse

Active selection for adjuvant treatment instead of surveillance?

Page 14: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Co

ncl

usi

on

s

1

• Inter-observer agreement in VI scoring on H&E

2

• Additional value of adding IHC for vascular markers

3

• Additional value of characterizing the type of vessel invaded

Moderate among TGCT-dedicatedpathologists, but can be improved

Increase in sensitivity for predictingdisease relapse

Identification of high-risk patients

(both LVI and BVI)

Page 15: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Co

ncl

usi

on

s

Indication for routine IHC use?

Endpoint: relapse-free survival

Large, prospective studies, with IHC

FUTURE

Page 16: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas
Page 17: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Supervising team:Rui Henrique

Carmen JerónimoLeendert Looijenga

Department of PathologyÂngelo Rodrigues

Paula LopesMariana Cantante

Rita Guimarães

Cancer Biology & Epigenetics GroupVera Gonçalves

Daniela Barros SilvaSandra Nunes

Ethics approval: CES IPO 1/2018

IPO Porto

The Netherlands

Project Funding: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-29043Doctoral Grant: SFRH/BD/132751/2017

Urology ClinicJorge Oliveira

Joaquina MaurícioIsaac Braga

Department of EpidemiologyLuís Antunes

PMC Utrecht (Group Looijenga)Ad Gillis

Annette van den BergRachita Lahri

Dennis Timmerman

Erasmus MC Rotterdam & LEPO

Wolter OosterhuisLambert Dorssers

Hans StoopWillem Boellaard

Page 18: Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I ...cpo-media.net/ECP/2019/Congress-Presentations/1532... · Improvement of vascular invasion scoring in stage I testicular non-seminomas

Thank you for your attention!