improved control algorithm for infrared paper dryers ece 480 senior design review
DESCRIPTION
Improved Control Algorithm for Infrared Paper Dryers ECE 480 Senior Design Review November 17, 2005 Blake Peck Rob Schaerer Jay Hudkins Carl Lee Instructor: Dr. Joe Law Technical Advisor: Dr. Joe Law Sponsor: Potlatch Corporation, Pulp and Paper Division. Presentation Outline. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
11/17/05
Improved Control Algorithm for
Infrared Paper Dryers
ECE 480 Senior Design Review
November 17, 2005
Blake Peck
Rob Schaerer
Jay Hudkins
Carl Lee
Instructor: Dr. Joe Law
Technical Advisor: Dr. Joe Law
Sponsor: Potlatch Corporation, Pulp and Paper Division
11/17/05
Presentation Outline
• Background
• Previous Design Work
• November 3rd Tour
• Design Concept 1
• Design Concept 2
• Design Concept 3
• What’s Next?
11/17/05
Background - Paper Manufacturing
• Uniform Moisture Content = Good Paper• IR Dryers:
– Divide paper sheet into “zones”– Monitor zone moisture content– Adjust zone heat
11/17/05
Background – Control System
Paper Line Control Rack
Control Room
Power Computer
Operator Computer RS 485
CP
U C
ard
Moisture SensorPhase
Monitoring
Gate Drivers/
ThyristrorsIR Lamps
Trigger C
ard 1
Trigger C
ard 2
Trigger C
ard 3
Trigger C
ard 4
11/17/05
Background - Potlatch Installation
• Potlatch purchased IR Dryers from Compact Engineering Ltd.
• Present Control algorithm doesn’t consider cumulative effect of individual lamp loads
• Some Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)• High Crest Factor (CF)
11/17/05
Previous Design Work
• Spring 05’ design team– Created improved control algorithm
• Decreases THD and Crest Factor
– Tested algorithm with scaled system model– Provided demonstration of concept– Provided architecture for power computer
11/17/05
November 3rd Tour – Big Picture
• High level perspective of control hardware • Understanding of physical locations
11/17/05
November 3rd Tour – Big PicturePOWER COMPUTER
Operating Console
Operating Computer
RS-485 Communications
Board (SERT-485)
Pass Through Board
Phase Monitor Unit
(PMU)
Gate Drivers
Thyristors
Key
boar
d
Mon
itor
Siz
e P
ress
Moi
stur
e S
enso
r (
RS
-232
)
Cal
enda
r M
oist
ure
Sen
sor (R
S-2
32)
Control Room Rack Room Power Control Cabinet PCC1 (1 of 2)
PCC1 (a-c)
Port 5
Port 6
Port 4
Phase Xmfrs
Pass Through Board
Phase Xmfrs
Phase Monitor Unit
(PMU)
CPU Card
Power Supply
Digital Trigger Card
Digital Trigger Card
Digital Trigger Card
Digital Trigger Card
PLC Interlock Computer
I/O/E
ther
net
Gate Drivers
Thyristors
PCC1 (d-f)
?
RS-485 RS-232
11/17/05
November 3rd Tour – Cabinets
Power Cabinet Control Cabinet
11/17/05
November 3rd Tour – PMU
• Phase monitoring unit– Detects zero crossings – Build or Purchase
11/17/05
November 3rd Tour – PMU
• Layout– 30 hours @ $30/hour = $900
• Fabrication– $400
• Total = $1300
11/17/05
November 3rd Tour – Knowledge Gained
• Arcom manufactures Power Computer, CPU card, and SERT 485 board
• Thyristor connection details
• RS 485 hardware connections
• Phase transformer specifications
11/17/05
Conceptual Design – Current System
• Issues:– Some THD
– High CF
11/17/05
Conceptual Design – Design 1
• Pro’s:– Least expensive solution
for paper machine #1– Less new hardware design– Majority of current system
left in tact
• Con’s:– More reverse engineering– Stuck with power
computer architecture– Modify Compact’s power
computer code
11/17/05
Conceptual Design – Design 2
• Pro’s:– Less reverse engineering
– High quality power computer documentation
– Lower long term cost
• Con’s:– Higher development cost
– More design engineering
– More testing required
11/17/05
Conceptual Design – Design 3
• Pro’s:– Little to no reverse
engineering
– Develop new communication protocol
– Easily managed user defined power levels
• Con’s:– Most development cost
– More development time
– Require extensive testing
11/17/05
What’s Next? – Project Tasks
• Detailed knowledge of 1st team’s work– Jay with Rob
• Operator and Power Computer code– Blake with Carl
• Hardware design– Carl with Blake
• Impact of 3-phase power– Rob with Jay
• Test and verification plan– Carl with everyone
• System documentation and organization – Rob with Jay
11/17/05
What’s Next? – Contact Points
• End of conceptual design – Mid November
• Approval of proposal– Mid January
• System built for testing– End of February
• System testing complete– End of March
• Installation– Next shutdown in April
11/17/05
Acknowledgements
• Joe Law• Jerry Spencer• Team #1
11/17/05
Questions?