implementing unbalanced scorecard

16
Tathagat Varma, Sr. Director, Yahoo! Strategy Execution 2013 Conference (c) Implementating Un Balanced Scorecard – A Case Study

Upload: tathagat-varma

Post on 08-May-2015

1.262 views

Category:

Business


2 download

DESCRIPTION

My presentation at Strategy Execution 2013 conference.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

Tathagat Varma, Sr. Director,

Yahoo! Strategy Execution 2013

Conference (c)

Implementating UnBalanced Scorecard

– A Case Study

Page 2: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

•  Balanced Scorecard •  Strategy Map •  Our Journey •  Challenges •  Results •  Learnings

Strategy Execution 2013 Conference (c)

Discussion Topics

Page 3: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

Strategy Execution 2013 Conference (c)

Balanced Scorecard

h"p://www.meshekah.com/wp-­‐content/uploads/2012/10/BSC-­‐concept-­‐BalancedScorecardReview.com_1.jpg    

Page 4: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

Next Generation Testing Conference (c) h"ps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Generic_Strategy_Map.png    

Page 5: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

•  Started in mid-2010 through 2012 •  Pragmatic and empirical approach •  Excellence program to reflect KRAs •  KPIs aligned with priorities and goals •  Goals for product and support groups •  QBRs to track and review

Strategy Execution 2013 Conference (c)

Our Journey

Page 6: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

• status  on  implementaHon  of  planned  iniHaHves  

• effecHveness  of  results  accomplished  on  a  quarterly  basis  

• strategic  iniHaHves  across  various  product  and  support  groups  in  a  highly  matrixed  organizaHon  

• execuHon  to  the  R&D  center  charter  and  overall  organizaHonal  strategy  

Align   Coordin-­‐ate  

Track  Review  

Page 7: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

•  Balanced vs. Unbalanced: “The most valuable use of a scorecard is as a driver of a strategically focused improvement process and as such need not and usually should not be “balanced””

•  Vital Few vs. Trivial Many: “Only a pattern of out-of control situations that can't be resolved by existing recovery processes should be a candidates for scorecard inclusion”

•  Financial vs. Non-financial: “OK, I'll admit it right up front: I still don't understand why we need financial measures on a scorecard at all”

•  Internal vs. External: “scorecard metrics, taken in their entirety, should be unbalanced in favor of internal or process metrics”

•  Leading vs. Lagging: “You can not manage lagging indicators ... they are inherently after-the-fact measures”

•  Short-term vs. Long-term: “Long-term objectives run the high risk of inadvertently incenting short-term inaction”

•  “In my opinion, most scorecards should be unbalanced toward internal, leading, short-term metrics.”

Strategy Execution 2013 Conference (c)

Our approach

h"p://www.schneiderman.com/The_Art_of_PM/must_a_BSC_be_balanced/must_a_BSC_be_balanced.htm    

Page 8: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

•  Delivering world-class performance by applying systems thinking approach to achieve •  a winning culture that promotes continuous

learning, personal growth and inter-group collaboration, and makes us “Proud to be a Yahoo!”

•  an execution system that supports operating as one product team to achieve agility, faster innovation, meaningful risk-taking and consistent delivery of world-class products with “wow” user experience

•  an operational model that makes best usage of company resources to provide a wow experience to employees and leaders

Strategy Execution 2013 Conference (c)

Excellence Program

Page 9: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

Cornerstones of Excellence program were broken down into “strategic horizontal programs”

Culture  

Retain  

Develop  

Hire  

Brand  Leadership  

Innova6on  

IP  Program  

InnovaHon  Program  

Technology  Thought  

Leadership  

Execu6on  

Agility  

Dev  Excellence  

Service  Engineering  &  OperaHons  

Opera6ons  

FaciliHes  Survey  

Feedback  

Fiscal  Discipline  

SLA  Performance  

Page 10: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

1.  Unbalancing the Scorecard 2.  Vertical vs. Horizontal Goals 3.  Organizational changes 4.  Execution, Execution, Execution 5.  Effectiveness review

Challenges

Page 11: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

Unbalancing the Scorecard

Beware:  The  Unbalanced  Scorecard  –  David  P  Norton  

Page 12: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

Effectiveness Reviews

h"p://www.selfleader.com/wp-­‐content/uploads/2009/12/AL-­‐2.jpg    

Page 13: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

•  There is no one-size-fits-all •  ‘Balanced’ has limited appeal •  Leadership’s role is critical •  Strategic PMO to coordinate •  Execution is the key •  Trends are more useful •  Constant realignment is needed •  Double-loop learning is beneficial

Strategy Execution 2013 Conference (c)

Learnings

Page 14: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

•  “If a good scorecard consists of 23–25 measures, all but five of them should focus on customers, internal processes, and learning and growth.” – David P. Norton, 2000

•  “Our work in innovation makes clear that unless companies differentiate beyond the norms of the competitive set in which they participate, they cannot get paid a differential return.” – Geoffrey Moore, 2005

Some parting thoughts

Page 15: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

•  http://www.schneiderman.com/Concepts/The_First_Balanced_Scorecard/How_the_Scorecard_Became_Balanced.htm

•  http://www.slideshare.net/Managewell/strategic-alignment-of-horizontal-and-vertical-pmo-goals-final

•  http://www.schneiderman.com/AMS_publications/Unbalanced%20Scorecard/unbalanced_scorecard.htm

•  http://www.schneiderman.com/Concepts/The_First_Balanced_Scorecard/BSC_INTRO_AND_CONTENTS.htm

•  http://geoffmoore.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/11/unbalanced_scor.html

Strategy Execution 2013 Conference (c)

References

Page 16: Implementing UnBalanced Scorecard

Tathagat Varma http://managewell.net

Strategy Execution 2013 Conference (c)