implementation of a stage-specific resident bootcamp: how ... · moazed f, cohen er, furiasse...

28
Implementation of a Stage-Specific Resident Bootcamp: How to Hit the Ground Running Drs. A. Hadjinicolaou (PGY-4), K. Kaspy (PGY-3), M. Dandavino, E. Ruano-Cea Montreal Children’s Hospital McGill University

Upload: others

Post on 30-Apr-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Implementation of a Stage-Specific Resident Bootcamp:

    How to Hit the Ground Running

    Drs. A. Hadjinicolaou (PGY-4), K. Kaspy (PGY-3), M. Dandavino, E. Ruano-Cea

    Montreal Children’s Hospital

    McGill University

  • Conflicts of interest

    None to declare

  • Introduction Conclusion Background Methods Discussion

    • Background

    • Methods

    • Lessons Learnt

    • Conclusion/Next steps

    Outline

  • Introduction Conclusion Methods Discussion Background

    What are Bootcamps?

    “Focused courses designed to enhance learning, orientation, and preparation for learners entering a

    new clinical role.”

    Blackmore, 2014

  • Introduction Conclusion Methods Discussion Background

    Why a Bootcamp in our Pediatrics Program?

    Goal: Optimally prepare residents to new roles and responsibilities at

    key transition periods of training.

    Incoming Junior Resident

    Nightfloat Senior

    Ward Senior

  • METHODS

  • Introduction Conclusion Discussion Background Methods

    Framework: Kern’s 6 Steps for Curriculum Development

    Kern et al (1998)

  • Introduction Conclusion Methods Discussion Background

    General Needs Assessment

    Blackmore (2014)

    Curriculum

    Most often: • Surgical / Procedural • Target entry level • Not stage-specific

    Outcomes

    • Focus on simulation-based sessions

    • Studies looked at improvement in: – clinical skills – knowledge acquisition – perceived confidence

  • Introduction Conclusion Discussion Background Methods

    Targeted Needs Assessment

    Content of 2nd Iteration

    Informal Focus

    Groups

    Feedback from 1st iteration

    Surveys • Key transition periods • “Must know” topics • Knowledge gap • Sources of “transition stress” • “Wish list”

  • Introduction Conclusion Discussion Background Methods

    Identification of key transition periods

    Clinical activities

    Session-specific Objectives

    Goals and Objectives

    Curricular Alignment Goal: Optimally prepare residents to new roles and

    responsibilities at key transition periods of training.

  • Educational strategies: Final curriculum content

    PGY-1 Bootcamp “Incoming junior

    resident” Handover, Patient Safety

    V-Sign

    Documentation

    Communication

    CXR, ECG

    Newborn Exam

    PALS-like Cases Technical Skills

    (LP, airway, wounds, lines)

    PGY-2 Bootcamp “Nightfloat senior”

    Overview Nightfloat Senior

    Morning Handover

    Hematology-Oncology

    Difficult Psychosocial Situations

    PICU cases

    End of Life Care

    Patients with Medical Complexities

    Challenging Conversations

    PGY-3 Bootcamp “Ward senior”

    Overview Ward Senior

    Multi-Disciplinary Meetings

    Bedside Rounds

    Discharges

    End of Life Care

    Patients with Medical Complexities

    Challenging Conversations

  • Introduction Conclusion Discussion Background Methods

    Educational Strategies: Novel Aspects

    1. Incorporation of Mastery Learning principles Clear standards (checklists) Assessment Component

  • Introduction Conclusion Discussion Background Methods

    Educational Strategies: Novel Aspects

    2. Residents as Coaches

  • Introduction Conclusion Discussion Background Methods

    Educational Strategies: Novel Aspects

    3. Multi-Disciplinary Teaching

  • Introduction Conclusion Discussion Background Methods

    Implementation

    Impact on Clinical Service Logistical Support Teaching Manpower

  • Introduction Conclusion Discussion Background Methods

    Program Evaluation

    • Self-administered survey • Bootcamp Committee debrief

    Immediately post-Bootcamp

    • Self-administered survey • Informal focus Groups • Bootcamp Committee debrief

    6 months post-Bootcamp

  • Introduction Conclusion Discussion Background Methods

    Program Evaluation: Conclusions

    Overall well received by residents • Most sessions rated >6.0 out of 7 • Residents reported feeling better prepared and improved self-efficacy

    before vs. after

    Knowledge Confidence Preparedness

    PrePost

    Chart1

    KnowledgeKnowledge

    ConfidenceConfidence

    PreparednessPreparedness

    Pre

    Post

    3.84

    6.12

    3.62

    5.9

    3.86

    5.83

    Sheet1

    PrePost

    Knowledge3.846.12

    Confidence3.625.9

    Preparedness3.865.83

    To update the chart, enter data into this table. The data is automatically saved in the chart.

  • Introduction Conclusion Discussion Background Methods

    STRENGTHS AREAS TO IMPROVE

    - General satisfaction - Increase in self-efficacy

    - Content recommendations - Resources

    Lessons learnt

    • More Deliberate Practice • More Residents as Teachers

    Program Evaluation: Conclusions

  • Introduction Conclusion Background Methods Discussion

    Team-Building: Enhancing the Learning

    Environment

  • Introduction Background Methods Discussion Conclusion

    Conclusions

    • A stage-specific bootcamp is a highly relevant and educationally-congruent strategy that can facilitate transitions to new clinical responsibilities.

    • Our experience could help postgraduate programs enhance

    their curricular alignment with CBD and CBME.

  • Introduction Background Methods Discussion Conclusion

    Future Steps : Bootcamp 2019-2020

    • Formalized presence of residents as teachers • Enhance Multi-Disciplinary aspect Teachers

    • Increase opportunities for Deliberate Practice • Enhance integration of Mastery Learning principles • Target sessions towards Royal College EPAs

    Teaching Strategies

    • Formalize the assessment of performance in clinical practice Assessment

  • Introduction Background Methods Discussion Conclusion

    A Special Thank You to:

    • All those who contributed to the brainstorming, content creation, session development and delivery of the Bootcamp

    • All the trainees who attended the Bootcamp • General Pediatrics Residency Program – Dr. Robert Sternszus and Dr. Olivia Tse • Department of Pediatrics – Dr. Michael Shevell • Division of General Pediatrics – Dr. Geoffrey Dougherty • The Bootcamp Committee – Dr. Elisa Ruano, Kimberley Kaspy, Amna Al

    Khuzaei

  • QUESTIONS? THANK YOU FOR LISTENING!

  • Introduction Conclusion Background Methods Discussion

    1. Blackmore C, Austin J, Lopushinsky SR, Donnon T. Effects of Postgraduate Medical Education "Boot Camps" on Clinical Skills, Knowledge, and Confidence: A Meta-Analysis. J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Dec;6(4):643-52. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00373.1.

    2. Moazed F, Cohen ER, Furiasse N, Singer B, Corbridge TC, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Retention of critical care skills after simulation-based mastery learning. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Sep;5(3):458-63. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00033.1.

    3. Castro D, Tcharmtchi MH, Thammasitboon S2. A Practical Application of Educational Theories in Developing a Boot Camp Program for Pediatric Critical Care Fellows. Acad Pediatr. 2016 Nov - Dec;16(8):707-711. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.08.007.

    4. Cohen ER1, Barsuk JH, Moazed F, Caprio T, Didwania A, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Making July safer: simulation-based mastery learning during intern boot camp. Acad Med. 2013 Feb;88(2):233-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827bfc0a.

    5. Winn AS, Marcus CH, Williams K, Smith GC, Gorbounova I, Sectish TC, Landrigan CP. Development, Implementation, and Assessment of theIntensive Clinical Orientation for Residents (ICOR) Curriculum: A Pilot Intervention to Improve Intern Clinical Preparedness. ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS 2018;18:140–144

    Key References

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Blackmore%20C%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=26140112https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Austin%20J%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=26140112https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Lopushinsky%20SR%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=26140112https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Donnon%20T%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=26140112https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26140112https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Moazed%20F%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=24404310https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Cohen%20ER%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=24404310https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Furiasse%20N%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=24404310https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Singer%20B%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=24404310https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Corbridge%20TC%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=24404310https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=McGaghie%20WC%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=24404310https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Wayne%20DB%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=24404310https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404310https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Castro%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=27772694https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Tcharmtchi%20MH%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=27772694https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thammasitboon%20S%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=27772694https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27772694

  • Additional Slides

  • Introduction Conclusion Background Methods Discussion

    • Consultation with local experts – Medical Education – Patient Safety – Simulation – Quality Improvement

    Educational Strategies

    Content: ∗ Communication ∗ Systems-based practice ∗ High-Yield Clinical Skills ∗ Procedural/Technical Skills ∗ Physical Exam Skills

  • Introduction Conclusion Background Methods Discussion

    • Incoming junior resident PGY-1

    • Nightfloat senior- inpatient ward PGY-2

    • Senior in-patient wards PGY-3

    Key Transition Periods

  • Introduction Conclusion Background Methods Discussion

    6. Program Evaluation: Surveys

    2. Suggestions & Comments

    5-point Likert scale Strongly disagree

    1

    Disagree

    2

    Neutral

    3

    Agree

    4

    Strongly agree

    5

    1. Components Learning environment Objectives Content Organization Instructors (preparation, communication, etc.) Overall session Baseline knowledge prior / after

    Sense of preparation prior / after

    Confidence prior / after

    Implementation of a �Stage-Specific Resident Bootcamp: �How to Hit the Ground RunningConflicts of interestOutlineWhat are Bootcamps?Why a Bootcamp in our Pediatrics Program?MethodsFramework: �Kern’s 6 Steps for Curriculum DevelopmentGeneral Needs AssessmentTargeted Needs Assessment Slide Number 10Educational strategies:�Final curriculum contentEducational Strategies:� Novel AspectsEducational Strategies:� Novel AspectsEducational Strategies:� Novel AspectsImplementationProgram EvaluationProgram Evaluation: ConclusionsSlide Number 18Team-Building:�Enhancing the Learning Environment�ConclusionsFuture Steps : Bootcamp 2019-2020A Special Thank You to: Questions?�Thank you for listening!Key References Additional SlidesEducational StrategiesKey Transition Periods6. Program Evaluation: Surveys