impact on britain in india india in ww2. patriotism 3 sept 1939 viceroy, lord linlithgow declared...
TRANSCRIPT
Impact on Britain in India
India in WW2
Patriotism3 Sept 1939 Viceroy, Lord Linlithgow
declared India at war.No consultation with Indian leaders
Some saw: an “affront (insult) that lasted longer than war”.
Lord Linlithgow:“confronted with the demand that she
should accept the dictation of a foreign power in relation to her own subjects, India has decided to stand firm”
Indian reaction2 m joined the army.Gandhi (INC) and Jinnah (ML) agreed to halt
plans for an Indian federation.BUT! Gandhi – advised pacifism and offered to go
to meet Hitler.Nehru and Congress attacked Hitler and
British appeasementCongress resigned from the ministries.Angered the British
and opened a door for the Muslim leaders.
Working Committee Muslim League, 1940
Lahore ResolutionJan 1940
Jinnah: “there are in India two nations”March 1940
100,000 members of Muslim League met at Lahore
Jinnah: “The Muslims are a nation by any definition”He compared Muslim/Hindu issue to
British/Irish situation.Lahore Resolution - Jinnah’s confusing and
complex answer to sectarian issues in India “independent states”
Source analysis and evaluation Jinnah “ It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to
understand the real nature of Islam and Hinduism. They are not religions in the strict sense of the word, but are, in fact, different and distinct social orders, and it is a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality, and this misconception of one Indian nation has troubles and will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. The Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, cultures. They neither intermarry nor interdine together and, indeed, they belong to two different civilizations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspect on life and of life are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Mussalmans derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, different heroes, and different episodes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other and, likewise, their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built for the government of such a state”.
AmbiguityResolution was very unclear.
Two equal separations? – A.K. Fazlul HuqTwo wings of one state – Jinnah
Did it mean partition?Did it mean a Hindu state inside an Indian
state?Jinnah clarified his intentions in 1946
Pakistan would be a secular Muslim state he did not favour a religious state
Research Two-Nation Theory also called “hostage theory”Problems
E.g. . what about Muslims not in those areas?Move?Stay as a weaker minority?
What about Sikhs and Pathans in new Muslim state?
Jinnah – Hostage TheoryMinorities would mutually protect rights of
other minorities.
Opinions & ConsequencesLahore ResolutionNehru - “fantastical” (unbelievable)Gandhi – “baffling” (confusing)British – kept quiet. Evidence of policy to
divide and conquer?Consequence: growing fears of reprisal/
vengeance/ retribution
Churchill as PMHe came to power in 1940 as war
deteriorated for Britain.Reactionary views on IndiaSec of State for India, Lord Zetland,
resigned because his views were considered too progressive.
Leo Amery appointedHis brief – Limited Concessions only.
Amery stated that constitutional reforms in India were on hold and would only continue after the war.
August 1940 OfferA constitutional settlement was proposed.
Dominion StatusRejected by CongressViceroy Linlithgow promised a crack down
on Congress if it initiated civil disobedience.Congress called for individual acts of
disobedience.Linlithgow wanted to declare Congress a
treasonable organisation but Churchill turned him down (why?).
20,000 imprisonments inside one year
Indian National ArmyFormed and led by Subhas Chandra Bose.Was it an army of traitors or were they freedom
fighters?1941 – Bose under house arrest.
He fled to Berlin to set up an army of liberation.Set up Indian legionSet up radio and issued propaganda about “Free India”.
Bose realised after meeting with Hitler that Germany only interested in his anti-British propaganda
Fled to Japan where he was supported by General Tojo Gained 10,000 volunteers.
INAINA – between 15000 and 50000 people.Went into battle against the British
Poorly suppliedMany killed and thousands surrenderedBose escaped and died in an air crash.
INA provoked unrest during and after war - how to deal with the captured INA soldiers.
1942Threat of invasion of UK over but war still
going badly.Threat of Japan increased
British defeats in the east and India under real threat.
Churchill needed strategic support of the USA
Churchill and Roosevelt disagreed strongly about the role of Britain in India.
Atlantic CharterAug 1941Basis for cooperationIncluded support for “sovereign rights and
self-government”Churchill’s view – this only applied to
conquered countriesRoosevelt’s view – fundamental principle
applying to all.FDR - pushed Churchill to make
concessions in India.
FDRWarned ChurchillUSA will not help Britain to hang onto the
empire.Even if an Indian uprising leads to invasion
by Japan/Germany.Churchill agreed to send Sir Stafford Cripps
to discuss Dominion status.
Cripps MissionWhy did he send Cripps?To buy off RooseveltCripps was a potential rival and this was
impossible taskLinlithgow not informed so angry with
Cripps from the start.
Cripps MissionTwo aims1. To discuss and win support for the offer of
dominion status.2. To discuss arrangements for the rest of
war and to give minimal concessions on this.
He announced his conclusions to a resounding lack of support from all sides including British
Offered to resign, withdrew it and parliament discussed the failure.
FailureTask One.Stuck to itUnder dominion status. Provinces would be
not to join the union.Encouraging Muslim disengagement from
Congress and Union?March 1942 – Cripps – first one to talk of
two states and the relocation of peoples.
FailureTask 2Went too far.Suggested an Indian Representative to join
the executive council.Angered Linlithgow and ChurchillFDR – proposed immediate dominion govt.Opposed by Churchill and Linlithgow.
ConsequenceWeakening of CongressGood for Churchill, Amery and LinlithgowUSA, Chinese and Labour Party demands
diminished in face of Congress’ ungrateful actions.
ConsequenceConstitution reform – put away FOR THE DURATION.Both sides harden their stanceLinlithgow:More press censorshipMore spying on CongressSummer 1942 – plans being drawn up for civil
disobedience.Mass strikes, destroy communications and railways.Intercepted by BritishLinlithgow – first plan – arrest and deport CongressWar Cabinet authorised Linlithgow – all necessary
measures
Quit India Resolution8 August 1942Gandhi - “Do or die for nothing less than
freedom”“to sanction, for the vindication of India’s
inalienable right to freedom and independence, the starting of a mass struggle on non-violent lines on the widest possible scale…. Every man and woman who is participating in the movement must function for himself or herself within the four corners of the general instructions issued”
British ResponseHow did the British respond?What was the effect of suppression on
respect for the British?
Viceroy WavellQuit India civil disobedience was contained.Having twice extended Linlithgow’s office,
Churchill had to choose.He chose Wavell, the Commander in Chief of India.
Why Wavell?A hard line?Wavell had lost confidence as Comm In ChiefPolitical skills and negotiation skills not needed.
Why?No negotiation required or under close control
from London.
Indian SituationWarIndia was paying UK vast sums towards war
effort1943 - £800m - UK could never afford to
repay
WavellTravelled to LondonRealised Churchill knew little about India,
hated India and was not committed to progress.
October 1943Started travelling India to consultHeld regular meets of the 11 provincial
governors.Linlithgow held none.
Bengal FamineTwo terrible harvests -42 and 43Lack of imports and other foodstuffs due to
warMalnutrition – pneumonia, cholera and
malariaBetween 1 and 3 million deaths.Wavell – humanitarian view – lives needed
to be savedPolitically key – British rule is supposed to
be good for idea.Criticisms from Jinnah about incompetence.
WavellActed fastDiverted troops from war to distribute foodIntroduced rationing and control panic buyingHad to request a new governor for BengalRequested grainCherwell advised Churchill that famine was
unlikelyWavell got half what he wanted, twice what he
was promised.By mid 1944 – under controlAmery “great damage to our reputation here”