impact of the ecj’s jurisprudence in practice (era march 2017)

12
Impact of the ECJ’s Jurisprudence in Practice — Selected Topics Dr Albert Sanchez-Graells ERA Annual Conference on European Public Procurement Law 2017 Trier, 30-31 March 2017 30 March 2017 1 ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

Upload: albert-sanchez-graells

Post on 21-Apr-2017

1.363 views

Category:

Law


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

Impact of the ECJ’s Jurisprudence in Practice — Selected TopicsDr Albert Sanchez-Graells

ERA Annual Conference on European Public Procurement Law 2017Trier, 30-31 March 2017

30 March 2017

1ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

Page 2: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

2

Agenda• Cover developments in recent ECJ case law in 3

selected areas of practical relevance:• Subcontracting & Joint Bidding• Contract Amendments and Termination• Scope of the Concessions Directive

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017

Page 3: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

3

Subcontracting & Joint Bidding (1)• Ostas celtnieks, C-234/14, EU:C:2016:6

• Requirement for undertakings seeking to rely on 3rd parties to have concluded a pre-award cooperation agreement including joint and several liability clause

• Decided under 2004 rules (Arts 47 & 48 Dir 2004/18) and, unsurprisingly declared incompatibility

• Difficulties interpreting Arts 19 & 63 Dir 2014/24

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017

Page 4: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

4

Subcontracting & Joint Bidding (2)• PARTNER … C-324/14, EU:C:2016:214

• Assessment of degree of scrutiny of agreements with 3rd parties on which tenderer seeks to rely

• Decided under 2004 rules but consideration of 2014 rules (Arts 48(3) Dir 2004/18 & 63(1) Dir 2014/24)

• Reliance cannot be of a “purely formal manner” and it is possible that capacities are “not transferable”

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017

Page 5: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

5

Subcontracting & Joint Bidding (3)• MT Højgaard and Züblin, C-396/14, EU:C:2016:347

• Equal treatment of a member of a consortium of 2 allowed to submit solo bid after partner’s bankruptcy

• Decided under 2004 rules, rectius general principles• No breach if solo bidder met all requirements and its

continuation does not place others at disadvantage• Lack of in-depth competition analysis • Ref to debate with Thomas (2015) and Ritter (2017)

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017

Page 6: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

6

Subcontracting & Joint Bidding (4)• Wrocław … C-406/14, EU:C:2016:562

• Assessment of absolute limitations on value (%) of subcontracting accepted in a given tender

• Decided under 2004 rules (ie Art 25 Dir 2004/18) • Clear incompatibility of a 75% maximum

subcontracting requirement• Affects interpretation of Art 71 Dir 2014/24

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017

Page 7: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

7

Subcontracting & Joint Bidding (5)• Pending case Borta, C-298/15• AG Sharpston’s Opinion [EU:C:2016:921]

• Requirement for contractor to carry out (ie not subcontract) ‘main work’ as specified by the contracting authority

• Assessed under Dir 2004/17, but also 2014/25 – but analysed under Arts 49 & 56 TFEU (below threshold)

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017

Page 8: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

8

Subcontracting & Joint Bidding (6)• Hörmann Reisen, C-292/15, EU:C:2016:817

• Raised issue of compatibility of prohibition to subcontract more than 30% of services with applicable public procurement rules

• Decided under 2004 rules, incl. Reg 1370/2007• Applicability Reg 1370/2007 clarified as lex specialis• Difficulties re Arts 63(2) & 71 Dir 2014/24

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017

Page 9: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

9

Contract Amendments and Termination• Finn Frogne, C-549/14, EU:C:2016:634

• Can a termination settlement infringe rules on illegal modification (reduction) of public contracts (mainly by proceeding to a sale rather than a lease)?

• Decided under 2004 rules, rectius general principles• Creates the idol of general modification clauses [37]• Difficult to interpret Arts 72(1)(a) (& 73) Dir 2014/24

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017

Page 10: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

10

Scope of the Concessions Directive• Promoimpresa, C-458/14, EU:C:2016:558

• Mutual exclusivity with Services Directive (2006/123)• Politanò, C-225/15, EU:C:2016:645

• 2004 rules did not apply to betting and gambling ‘concessions’ (rectius, licences or authorisations)

• Hörmann Reisen, C-292/15, EU:C:2016:817• Inapplicable to transport sector; Reg 1370/2007

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017

Page 11: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

11

Further reading

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017

Page 12: Impact of the ECJ’s jurisprudence in practice (ERA March 2017)

12

Thank you for your attention

Be in [email protected] @asanchezgraells

ERA Annual Public Procurement Conference 2017

30 March 2017