DECLARATION

I wish to declare that this thesis, “Impact of floods on women and girls of Lower Shire in

Southern Malawi” submitted for the qualification of a Master‘s degree in Development Studies

at Pentecostal Life University, in the Faculty of Postgraduate Studies, is my original and

independent work, and has not been presented for a degree in any other university. All the

sources used in this work have been acknowledged by means of references.

Name: Lickson L.S. Mchepa Date: ………………………………………

Signature ………………………………

Supervised by:

Name: Prof. M. Chinthenga

Signature: ……………………………. Date: ……………………………………….

i

DEDICATIONTo my Saviour Jesus Christ for giving me strength and courage,

my loving wife Tiyamike and son, Takondwa, for their warm love, support and understanding. You are the best.

ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

My deepest appreciation goes to the Almighty God for granting me good health and the grace

thus enabling me to complete my dissertation. The successful completion of this research work

could not have been possible had it not been for valuable contributions made by several persons

and institutions. I would like to say thank you to all of you. However, I want to thank the

following individuals and institutions for their various contributions:

My dear wife and best friend, Tiyamike M. Mchepa. You made this Degree possible and deserve

my appreciation for always being there when I needed you. You believed in me when the rest of

the world turned away. You proved to be the wife the Bible speaks about in Proverbs 12:4 ...a

wife of noble character is her husband's crown. My love, you are my crown. To my son,

Takondwa, you are a gift from God.

My Supervisor, Prof. M. Chinthenga, for his continued support and guidance, encouragement

and advice, as well as for his love and care. His patience, personality and academic capability

encouraged me constantly.

Prof. B. Kamchacha and Prof. Kingston Ngwira, for always being there for assistance.

Representatives from Chikwawa and Nsanje district councils for all of your support and kind

assistance.

My heartfelt thanks also go to my boss, Mr. Wyson Phiri who allowed me to pursue this degree

and my office mate Mrs. Rose Namakhwa who could always stand in when I was engaged in this

study.

Thank you

iii

ABSTRACT

This study examined the impact of floods on women and girls of Chikwawa and Nsanje Districts

of Malawi. The study employed both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The study had

discussions with key Stakeholders at district and Community levels as well as randomly sampled

households. Quantitative Household Questionnaires and Qualitative Key Informant Interviews

were used to collect the data. The study established that floods impacted on women’s critical

aspects such as agriculture, health, education, security, housing, water and sanitation and

property and assets. The study identified that the coping strategies employed by female headed

households were majorly a function of four factors namely: cultivating on small portions on

higher grounds, temporal migration to higher grounds, doing manual work in cane fields and

raising the floor of the house.

From the results, it has been concluded that women and girls suffer most during disasters. It was

observed that women depend much on their husbands for decisions. This is mainly due to

inadequate education, lack of access to resources and traditional gender roles in our societies. It

also observed that effects of floods in one sector can affect other sectors of society.

The following are the key recommendations:-

Government and key Stakeholders should engage communities in order for them to move

permanently to higher grounds as they have expressed willingness to relocate. The relocating

should go with the provision of all the necessary social amenities such as schools, hospitals,

infrastructure, water and agriculture support for a period of three (3) years to enable the

households settle. Consideration should also be made to introduce alternative livelihood

strategies in the new area of settlement.

There is need for government to be more proactive than reactive by considering giving out

small grants for community’s pre-disaster project activities in order to reduce disaster losses.

Flood resistant crops and the distribution of these seeds in flood prone areas can be

introduced with special emphasis on women’s home-based crop cultivation.

Keywords: Flood disaster, Female headed households, Food security, Vulnerability, Resilience, Coping strategies

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTSDECLARATION........................................................................................................................................ i

DEDICATION........................................................................................................................................... ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT........................................................................................................................iii

ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................................ iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................................................................................................v

LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................viii

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1

1.0. Research Overview.........................................................................................................................1

1.1. Background of the study................................................................................................................1

1.2. Statement of the problem...............................................................................................................3

1.3. Research Questions...........................................................................................................................4

1.4. Overall Objective of the Study.......................................................................................................4

1.4.1. Specific Objectives...................................................................................................................4

1.5. Significance of the Study................................................................................................................5

1.6. Layout of the Paper........................................................................................................................5

1.7. Chapter Summary..........................................................................................................................5

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW.................................................................................................6

2.0 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................6

2.1 Types of Floods................................................................................................................................7

2.2 Causes of Floods..............................................................................................................................7

2.3 Flood Risk........................................................................................................................................8

2.4 Mortality...........................................................................................................................................8

2.5 Livelihoods.....................................................................................................................................10

2.6 Education and Participation.........................................................................................................11

2.7 Poverty and Vulnerability.............................................................................................................11

2.8 Flood Damage and Losses.............................................................................................................12

2.9. Women’s family and property responsibility.............................................................................14

2.10. Violence against women.............................................................................................................15

2.11. Food Security..............................................................................................................................15

2.12. Impacts of floods on health........................................................................................................17

2.13. Early Warning and Mitigation..................................................................................................18

2.14. Coping Strategies........................................................................................................................19

v

2.15. Conceptual Framework..............................................................................................................20

2.16. Chapter Summary......................................................................................................................21

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY...................................................................................23

3.0. Introduction..................................................................................................................................23

3.1. Research Approach......................................................................................................................23

3.2 Research Strategy..........................................................................................................................23

3.3. Source of Data...............................................................................................................................23

3.4. Sample Selection and Size............................................................................................................23

3.5. Data collection Procedure............................................................................................................24

3.6. Data Analysis and Presentation...................................................................................................25

3.7. Scope of the Study Area...............................................................................................................25

3.7 Ethical Considerations..................................................................................................................27

3.8 Limitations of the study.................................................................................................................27

3.9. Chapter Summary........................................................................................................................28

CHAPTER 4: SURVEY FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION...................................................................29

4.0. Introduction..................................................................................................................................29

4.1. Findings from Primary Data...........................................................................................................29

4.1.1. Household Demographics........................................................................................................29

4.1.2. Sources of Household Income....................................................................................30

4.1.3 Impact of floods on Crop production........................................................................................31

4.1.5. Impact of floods on General Health.........................................................................................34

4.1.6 Impact of floods on Water and Sanitation................................................................................35

4.1.7. Impact of Floods on Education................................................................................................37

4.1.8. Impact of Floods on Protection and Access to Justice.............................................................38

4.1.9. Ways of Accessing Flood Information......................................................................40

4.1.10 Underlying Causes of Women Vulnerability.........................................................41

4.1.11. Coping Strategies.........................................................................................................42

4.2. Findings from Secondary Data....................................................................................................43

4.3. Response Rate...............................................................................................................................43

4.4. Chapter Summary........................................................................................................................43

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................45

5.0. Introduction..................................................................................................................................45

5.1 Conclusions....................................................................................................................................45

vi

5.2. Recommendations..........................................................................................................................47

5.3. Consideration for further research..................................................................................................48

5.4. Practical Contribution..................................................................................................................48

5.5. Chapter Summary........................................................................................................................49

REFERENCES........................................................................................................................................50

APPENDICES.........................................................................................................................................55

Appendix 1: Letter of Approval.........................................................................................................55

Appendix 2: Letter for the Respondents................................................................................................56

Appendix 3: Household Questionnaire..............................................................................................57

vii

LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS

% Percentage

AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

CSOs Civil Society Organization

DRR Disaster Risk Reduction

FGD Focus Group Discussion

GDP Gross Domestic Product

GoM Government of Malawi

HIV Human Immune Virus

ISDR International Strategy for Disaster Reduction

LDC Least Developed Countries

MDS Master of Arts in Development Studies

MSF Medicines San Frontiers

NGO Non-Government Organisation

NSO National Statistical Office

OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

SADD Sex and Age Disaggregated Data

SDC Social Development Commission

STDs Sexually Transmitted Diseases

TV Television

UK United Kingdom

UNESCO United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization

UNICEF United Nations International Children‘s Fund

WEDO Women’s Environment & Development Organisation

WHO World Health Organisation

viii

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.0. Research Overview

This study falls into the programme of Master of Arts in Development studies (MDS). It

explored the impact of floods on women and girls in the Lower Shire in Southern Malawi.

Regular floods are part of people’s lives in various regions of the world, recurring with varying

magnitudes and frequencies to which people have adapted for centuries. These floods are

generally expected and welcomed in many parts of the world, since they enrich the soil and

provide both water and livelihoods. Usually a flood is an overflow of water that submerges land,

low-lying villages and towns or an unusual condition affected by inflow of the tide. Flooding

may occur as an overflow of water from water bodies, such as a river or lake, or sea or large

natural water basins, or it may occur due to an accumulation of rainwater on saturated ground in

an aerial flood.

1.1. Background of the study

The frequency of natural disasters has been increasing over the years, resulting in loss of life,

damage to property and destruction of the environment (Living with Risk 2006). Flooding is

among the most significant issues affecting sustainable development in many countries. It affects

many hundreds of thousands of households annually causing recurrent losses of material goods,

endangered lives, thereby affecting progress towards sustainable human development. Hazards

can become disasters and worsen when particular groups are precluded from obtaining access to

social, political, economic, and physical resources (Mwape, 2009).

Malawi is affected by floods each and every year. One of the areas highly affected is the Shire

Valley, which has seen extreme conditions including heavy rains that result in floods. The most

serious have been intense rainfall, riverine floods and flush floods in 2012 and 2015. Malawi

Post Disaster Needs Assessment Report 2015 indicates that the January 2015 rainfall was the

highest on record for Malawi and constitutes a 1 in 500 year event, and caused significant

flooding – predominantly in the Southern Region, exacerbating an already precarious situation

for rural households in this region. It is estimated that the floods affected 1,101,364 people,

displaced 230,000 and killed 106 people (GoM, 2015). As a result, on January 13, 2015, the

President declared a state of disaster for the following 15 districts: Nsanje, Chikwawa,

ix

Phalombe, Zomba, Blantyre, Chiradzulu, Thyolo, Mulanje, Balaka, Machinga, Mangochi,

Ntcheu, Salima, Rumphi and Karonga. Several of these affected districts represent the poorest

areas of the country. Based on the recent Integrated Malawi Household Survey, the most highly

affected districts – Nsanje, Chikwawa, Phalombe and Zomba – have poverty incidences above

the national average of 50.7 percent, ranging from 55 to 80 percent (NSO, 2008). The sheer lack

of household data and information such as Sex and Age Disaggregated Data (SADD) of the

people affected by floods limits the capability to undertake gender analysis to guide the

emergency response and is yet another reminder of the urgent need of a national registration

mechanism.

According to GoM (2015), the 2015 floods have caused substantial damage and losses in the

productive, public infrastructure and social service sectors, including private and community

assets. The floods washed away livestock, destroyed thousands of buildings, houses and assets,

and damaged roads, bridges, irrigation infrastructure and school and health facilities. To

compound the disaster, the onset of the rains this 2014/15 season was delayed by more than 30

days in most parts of the Southern Region. This late start of the rainy season and the shortened

growing season that followed further impeded crop production and recovery in a country that

heavily relies on agriculture for economic growth and subsistence. These have adversely

impacted on food and water security, water quality, energy and the sustainable livelihoods of

rural communities.

Figure 1.1: Crops washed away by floods in Lower shire in 2015

Source: Internet

The findings by World Bank show that the regions mostly affected by the flood have per capita

poverty rates of 75 percent or more (measured as US$1.25 per day). The average rate in Malawi

x

is around 40 percent. These trends suggest that populations in flood-prone areas tend to be

poorer. Grunfest (1995) argues that due to high poverty levels, people have become more

vulnerable because they live in hazardous areas including flood plains and steep hills. They have

fewer resources which makes them more susceptible to disasters. The poverty level affects the

resilience and process of recovery from disasters.

Women’s vulnerabilities to natural disasters are different from the male population. Women

suffer greater vulnerability in times of floods. Vulnerability to social and economic threats and

stress create livelihood insecurity. The root causes of this vulnerability lie with the lack of access

to the resources that allow people to cope with hazardous events – such as income, education,

health and social networks. This access may be gendered, in that women and girls in general tend

to have less access to, or control over, assets than men and boys. Vulnerability may also be

related to the roles women and men play in society. Gender-biased attitudes and stereotypes also

complicate and prolong women’s recovery from disasters (Bradshaw and Fordham, 2013).

The researcher commissioned this study to better understand the the impact of flood on women

in the Lower shire. Investigation into how these disparities operate during and after disasters was

required to learn important lessons which can be positively fed into DRR preparedness plans and

post-disaster responses. Vulnerability and its underlying causes play important roles in

determining the severity of impact on a particular social group; therefore it was essential to have

a greater understanding of the dynamics of the vulnerability of women in the Malawian context,

in terms of disaster risk.

1.2. Statement of the problem

Lower Shire has suffered floods for a number of rainfall seasons and the 2014/15 season has

been described by Malawi government and international organizations as the worst in terms of

the amount of rainfall received and level of impact. For being in a low-lying area, the

community has limited capacity to control the hydrological events ensuing from Shire river.

As a result, the community experiences floods in every rainy season. The floods cause

displacement of people from their usual dwelling places resulting into varying impacts on

infrastructure, crops, health, education, environment as well as damage to property (Malawi

Government’s need Assessment Report, 2015).

xi

Disaster impact shows that the vulnerability of men and women to disaster, their capacities, and

the options available to them differ in character and scale to their gender (Ariyabandu and

Wickramasinghe, 2005). Women are most present in areas of employment within the agricultural

and informal sectors, which are often the worst affected by disasters; thus the rates of

unemployment among women after a disaster are high. In general, women are the most likely to

be affected by floods, but their concerns are least likely to be addressed. Women are typically

absent from the forum where Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) decisions/ planning are made, so

when priorities are established, the interests of women are often poorly represented.

It is also worth noting that studies undertaken in the past have not looked at the impact on

women and girls in depth and the response therefore has remained adhoc, focusing on short-term

measures.

1.3. Research Questions

The study sought to answer the following questions:

1.3.1 What is the impact of floods on women and girls in Lower Shire?

1.3.2 What are the causes of vulnerability of floods to women and girls?

1.3.2 What coping strategies can mitigate the effects of floods?

1.4. Overall Objective of the Study

The overall objective of the study was to assess the impact of floods on women and girls in

Lower Shire Districts of Malawi.

1.4.1. Specific Objectives

The specific objectives of the study were as follows:

i. To identify the impact which floods have had on the women and girls in Lower Shire,

ii. To establish and analyze the underlying causes of vulnerability of the women and girls; and

xii

iii. To identify coping mechanisms employed by the community during floods and strengthen

positive coping strategies.

1.5. Significance of the Study

The study was important because it assessed and estimated the effects of floods on the women

and floods. The study has established the underlying causes of vulnerability of women in Lower

Shire. More importantly, it is envisaged that the outputs of the study will be key inputs in the

designing of sustainable mitigation measures to minimize the impact of floods and the associated

risks of women and vulnerable groups.

1.6. Layout of the Paper

The chapters in this study shall be presented as follows: Chapter 1 is introducing the research.

This will outline the rationale for the chosen topic, problem statement, objectives, purpose and

motivation of the research and significance of the study. Furthermore, this chapter will highlight

the history and description of the study area. This chapter also highlights the issues of the

community in terms of social economics factors of the study area. Chapter 2 will look at

literature on the disasters and women and the floods in Chikwawa and Nsanje which will be

reviewed in order to develop a conceptual framework of the study. Chapter 3 will examine the

methodology the researcher will use to gather data. Chapter 4 shares the concept of the findings.

Chapter 5 will present conclusions and recommendations.

1.7. Chapter Summary

This chapter introduced the study on the floods and its impact on women and girls: a case study

of Lower shire floods in Southern Malawi. It also outlined the general overview of the research

topic, scope of the study area, the research problem, research questions, research objectives, and

significance of the study.

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.0 Introduction

xiii

Floods are one of the most common hazards which cause death, injuries, property damage, and

contamination of drinking water and disruption of electrical services. Flood disaster affects more

people on annual basis than any other form of natural disaster but studies (e.g. (Foa and Kozak,

1986) have shown that men and women are not affected in an equal magnitude. Women are

made more vulnerable than men because women have reduced access to education and are often

excluded from disaster prevention and preparedness, including in emergency intervention

programme (Young, 2008). The unequal impact of floods on women, compared to men, is not

limited to natural disasters alone; rather, it also permeates in everyday life and opportunities.

The gender inequality resulted from the socially constructed norms, expectancies, values, roles

and relations, which till today guide our attitude and perceptions of gender roles. Men’s

stereotypical belief that women should continue to take charge of the domestic chores in the

home domain, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that women have joined the workforce

in thousands, has not ameliorated their sufferings. Symke (1991) reported that in the normal

situation, women, on average, work one to three hours per day longer than men in the society,

whatever the number of hours men put in. Howard (1992) asserts that more women than men

hold multiplicity of roles. In addition, women in formal employment are still expected to perform

their roles as mothers, wives, and health and child care providers within the family, which

cumulatively put them under immense psychological stress. Performing reproductive

responsibilities in the flood disaster camps and keeping a continual vigilant eye on young

children, even as they cry for food in such helpless situations, are emotion- provoking and stress-

laden.

In Europe, Pistrika and Tsakiris (2007) allude that the scale and frequency of floods are likely to

increase in the future because of climate change, inappropriate river management and

infrastructure development in the areas where they are always flooded. Climate change causes

new developments on flood plains, which increase pressures on the urban system. This leaves

less potential water storage space when there is an event of flooding (Gill 2004).

2.1 Types of Floods

xiv

Smith (1999) believes that floods are the most common type of disaster worldwide and he also

mentions the three major types being categorized as river floods, flash floods and coastal floods.

According to UNESCO (2004), river floods or seasonal floods are caused by seasonal

precipitation over large catchment areas, melting of snow or a combination of these. Flash floods

or tropical storm floods are associated with violence and are accompanied by heavy rainfalls

which become too much for the streams and rivers to handle, and they overflow and produce

floods. They have short duration, and are measured in minutes not hours. Lastly, the coastal

floods which include storms, winds and other events cause ocean water to overflow and lead to

onshore flooding.

2.2 Causes of Floods

According to Nott (2006), the causes of floods can be broadly divided into physical, such as

climatological forces, and human influences such as vegetation clearing and urban development.

The most common causes of floods are climate related, most notably rainfall. Prolonged rainfall

events are the most common cause of flooding worldwide. These events are usually associated

with several days, weeks or months of continuous rainfall. Some of the floods are not directly

caused by climatology, for example from excessive high tides associated with storm-surge

effects caused by a combination of very low barometer pressure and high wind speeds; others are

caused by earthquakes, landslides or failure of dams and other control works (Ward 1978).

Human impacts on river catchments influence flood behavior. Land use changes in particular

have a direct impact on the magnitude and behavior of floods. Deforestation results in increased

run-off and often a decrease in channel capacity due to increased sedimentation rates.

There are two key elements that cause floods – rainfall intensity and duration. The rate of rainfall

explains the intensity, and the duration is how long the rain continues. Flash floods take a few

minutes or hours to develop after an intense rainfall or failure of a dam or levee, or sudden

release of water held by ice or debris jam. These floods can catch people unprepared (Master’s in

Disaster 2007).

Flooding can be caused by eruptions of water that are let loose by the bursting of man-made

dams. Dams are subjected to pressure and the volume of water impounded behind them is

xv

enormous. Because water itself is extremely heavy, a well-designed, properly located and

soundly constructed dam may only remain safe for hundreds of years and could not forever

withstand wear, exposure and hydrostatic pressures that build up within the reservoir. To avoid

disasters, dams must regularly be inspected and repaired. Floods can cause calamities and be

taken as agents of death and destruction, but they also bring measureless bounties of blessings

(Champ 1983).

Barredo (2009) in his article argues that there is evidence that societal change and economic

development are the principal factors responsible for the increasing losses from natural disaster

to date. He assessed normalized flood losses in Europe from 1970 to 2006. In his discussion after

using relevant data, he says there is no evidence of a clear positive trend in normalized flood

losses in Europe. Again based on a hypothetical scenario without climate change, he says flood

losses would continue to increase as a consequence of societal and economic factors.

2.3 Flood Risk

Flood risk is the likelihood of a flood event to cause damage to human health and life, the

environment and economic activity. In quantifying the flood risk, the results are either in

monetary units or loss of life units if the losses are measurable or are in qualitative terms in the

case of intangible damages which are social, environmental or cultural (Pistrika & Tsakiris

2007).

2.4 Mortality

Disasters affect men and women in different ways, with greater impacts on women and children

(Dasgupta, Siriner, & Partha, 2010). Across the globe, women are at greater risk in disasters than

men (Phillips, Jenkins, & Enarson, 2009), with a higher disaster mortality rate for women than

men in developing countries (Domeisen, 1998; Neumayera & Plümperb, 2007). Phillips, et al.

(2009) wrote that the common factor in recent tsunamis, earthquakes, and hurricanes has been

that, overwhelmingly, most victims are women, children and other vulnerable groups.

xvi

Historically, too, the figures are stacked against women’s and children’s survival. For example,

‘Considerable excess mortality occurred amongst adult females’ in both the 1948 and 1966

Russian earthquakes. In one, the Ashkabad earthquake, of the 33,000 who died, only 18 per cent

were men: 47 per cent were women and 35 percent were children. In the second, in Tashkent, 20

per cent more women died than men (Beinin, 1981 cited in Rivers, 1982).

Such differential mortality rates are most probably the result of gender determined roles with

their separate expectations and exposures to risk (Molin Valdés, 2009; Rivers, 1982). One

explanation offered was women’s responsibility for children hampering their escape, but Rivers

(1982) goes further to state that choices made during various disasters impact on who dies. Her

example questions the veracity of the notion of ‘women and children first’. Forty per cent of

survivors of the sinking of the Titanic in 1912 were men, including over half the crew, leaving

30 per cent of the women and children on board to go down with the ship.

Women died in significantly larger numbers in the 1991 Bangladesh cyclone, the 1993

Maharashtra earthquake, the 1995 Kobe earthquake, as well as the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in

Indonesia, India and Sri Lanka. Specifically, women accounted for 90% of the 140,000 people

killed in Bangladesh in the 1991 cyclone disaster, 61% of the deaths in Cyclone Nargis in

Myanmar, 55–70% of Banda Aceh tsunami deaths, including in Kuala Cangkoy, which was one

of the worst affected districts in the North Aceh, Indonesia, with an 80% female fatality rate

(WEDO, 2008).

Although the effect of disaster on women is easier to observe and document in under-developed

countries, the differential effect is evident in the developed world too. For example, there is some

evidence from the US to suggest the situation is reversed and that more men than women are

killed in disasters caused by severe weather events (Fothergill, 1998). While Fothergill (1998)

listed lightning, thunderstorms, flash floods and hurricanes, this is equally true for bushfires in

Australia, where the Black Saturday bushfires killed 100 males and 73 females. One explanation

is that men take greater risks than women, and are more likely to be involved in outdoor

activities (Neumayera & Plümperb, 2007).

xvii

Although men are also affected by flood disaster, most of them do not stay at the camp all day

unlike women. Consequently, men do not face the emotional trauma of watching their children

cry for food as do women. Furthermore, while disasters create hardships for everyone,

irrespective of gender, flood disasters on average, kill more women than men in developing

countries, where women have very low social, economic and political status. Duncan (2007)

reported that in general, more women than men were killed by flood disasters, partly because

they were less physically able to run, and partly because many of them were drowned trying to

save their children.

2.5 Livelihoods

Men’s livelihoods are often more visible as women tend to engage in the informal sector and in

lower-skilled occupations, earning on average less than men. In Vietnam, almost half of working

women are self-employed in agriculture, compared to a third of working men, and around 26 %

of working women are self-employed outside of agriculture compared to 19% of men (World

Bank, 2008). In Cambodia around 53% of economically active women, compared to 32% of

men, work in the unpaid labor category, such as housework or self-employment (World Bank

2008). While women’s paid and unpaid labor account for a large part of countries’ economies,

women’s assets such as jewelry, tools, and supplies, are less likely to be accounted in damage

and loss assessments.

As a result, after disasters, compensation schemes and lost asset and livelihood restoration tend

to focus solely on men’s needs, leaving women in a more vulnerable position. For instance in the

aftermath of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, assistance was available in the form of replacing

fishing boats but there was scarce support to help replace women’s fish processing tools and

marketing vehicles(Trohanis, Svetlosakova, and Carlsson-Rex; 2012). Lacking resources

consequently impedes or slows down the ability to recover.

Women’s roles during physical reconstruction are often considered marginal, while their

contributions to the social side of reconstruction are often unappreciated—including childcare,

household maintenance and care of the elderly. There is evidence that gender blind relief efforts

leave women marginalized in their efforts to access support if they rely on existing structures of

xviii

resource distribution that reflects the patriarchal structure of society (Neumayer and Pluemper,

2007).

2.6 Education and Participation

The institutions making decisions related to disaster risk management policy and legislation are

invariably male dominated. Often, women are seen as vulnerable ‘victims’ rather than as active

change agents. While they carry a disproportionate burden of a disaster, women’s voices are

often excluded from decision making processes about how to manage disaster risks and the

recovery process, and their particular needs are often overlooked (Trohanis, Svetlosakova, and

Carlsson-Rex, 2012).

Unequal educational outcomes, such as the ability to read, heighten the vulnerability of women

and girls and limit their ability to benefit from information campaigns and early warning

systems. Information, coordination and allocation of responsibility are vital in effective

emergency response and recovery. In addition, school dropout rates for women and girls are

higher than for boys (Trohanis, Svetlosakova, and Carlsson-Rex, 2012).

2.7 Poverty and Vulnerability

Poverty does not equal vulnerability but being poor makes people more vulnerable to disasters

because poor people lack the resources (physical, social and knowledge based) to prepare for and

respond to such threats and shocks as natural hazards. Conditions of vulnerability are a

combination of factors that include poor living conditions, lack of power, exposure to risk and

the lack of capacity to cope with shocks and adverse situations. Poor people often get locked in a

cycle of vulnerability. Because they are poor, they become vulnerable. Because they are

vulnerable, they are at great risk in the face of a natural hazard, leading to disaster. Close

analysis of disaster impact shows that the vulnerability of men and women to disaster, their

capacities, and the options available to them differ in character and scale to their gender

(Ariyabandu and Wickramasinghe 2005).

xix

A study carried out in 2005 in Southeast Bangladesh confirms the positive relationship between

environmental risk, poverty and vulnerability. Poorer segments of society live closer to the river

and therefore face a higher risk of flooding and are thus more vulnerable. Environmental risk

exposure also goes hand in hand with income inequality and access to natural resources

(Brouwer, et al.2007). Families living nearer to the river seem to have fewer opportunities to

engage in multiple economic activities which make them more vulnerable to natural disasters

and may keep them trapped in a poverty cycle (Brouwer, et al.2007).

Dixit (2003) points out that vulnerability is the condition of a person or group in terms of their

capacity to anticipate, cope with, resist and recover from the impact of a natural hazard. Even in

normal times people live in vulnerable conditions. Vulnerable conditions and families find it

hardest to reconstruct their livelihood following a disaster. Families do not live in conditions that

are vulnerable to disasters out of ignorance about the hazards or their erroneous perceptions of

risk. Instead, most have little freedom to choose how and where they live. Vulnerability therefore

is not static but a dynamic process that depends upon the social, economic and political contexts

that change overtime, which will consequently affect the probability of loss. On the other hand,

he suggests that strengthening social resilience capacity would reduce vulnerability. These

social, political and economic conditions and their interrelationships during normal “times”

determine why certain sections of the societies are more vulnerable to disasters than others.

Vulnerability to disaster occurs also as a result of women’s poverty. For example, as women are

poorer than men across the globe, they are more likely to live in areas that are more susceptible

to disaster and housing that is poorly constructed (Dasgupta, et al., 2010; Scanlon, 1998). They

are less likely to have the resources to escape if a disaster threatens (Henrici, Helmuth, & Braun,

2010).

2.8 Flood Damage and Losses

Borrows and De Bruin (2006) indicated that among natural catastrophes, flooding has claimed

more lives than any other single natural hazard. In the decade 1986 to 1995, flooding accounted

for 31% of the global economic loss from natural catastrophes and 55% of the casualties. The

xx

damaging effects of flooding are likely to become more frequent, more prevalent and more

serious in the future.

Smith and Ward (1998) argued that direct losses to floods occur immediately after the event as a

result of the physical contact of the flood waters with humans and with damageable property.

However, indirect losses which are less easily connected to the flood disaster and often operate

on-long time scales, may be equally, or even more important. Depending on whether or not

losses are capable of assessment in monetary values, they are termed tangible and intangible.

Some of the most important direct consequences of flooding such as loss of human life or the

consequent ill health of the survivors are intangible. Indirect and intangible consequences of

flooding are probably greatest in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), especially where frequent

and devastating floods create special impacts for the survivors.

Primarily losses can be high in rural areas where most of the damage is sustained by crops,

livestock and the agriculture infrastructure, such as irrigation system, levees, walls and fences.

In other words primary losses relate mainly to the disruption of economic and social activities,

especially in urban areas, immediately after a flood (Smith and Ward 1998).

According to Lind, et al. (2008), the loss in case of flooding has many dimensions. In addition to

economic loss and loss of life and injury, there may be irreversible loss of land, of historical for

cultural valuables and loss of nature or ecological valuables.

For thousands of years, people have settled in flood plains attracted by the fertile soils, the flat

terrain appropriate for settlements, and they have access to safe water. They further observed that

floods are natural phenomenon that has always existed and people have tried to use them for

their advantage to the extent possible. However, increased population density, urbanization and

agricultural expansion in flood prone areas have steadily increased society’s vulnerability to the

negative effects of floods. As a consequence, floods have become more and more disastrous to

human settlements (Kundzewicz, et al., 2002). They further argue that economic development of

flood prone areas is a factor that increases flood risk. Population pressure and shortages of land

cause encroachment into flood plains.

xxi

According to OCHA (2008), the cumulative number of people affected by rains and floods in

2007 in Southern Africa was more than 194,103 persons. This included 60,995 in Malawi

(mostly damage to property and crops), 94,760 people in Mozambique (all were evacuated into

resettlement camps); more than 16,680 in Zambia (1,890 persons in temporary accommodation,

the rest in host families); and 15,168 in Zimbabwe. An estimated additional 4,000 people had

been affected in Lesotho and another 2,500 persons in Swaziland.

Adamson (1983) states that extreme events such as floods over Southern Africa have resulted in

loss of life, massive damage to property, crops and livestock and disrupted communications.

The risk of such events at any point in the sub-continent may be small but their occurrence

within the total sub-continental space has been historically quite frequent.

2.9. Women’s family and property responsibility

In many cases women rely on the knowledge of their partners. If household members with more

flood knowledge and experience are away at the time of the flooding, women are left to face the

incident not knowing what to do (Goodman, & Rowe, 2003). Gendered vulnerability in the

Australian bushfire context is, perhaps, most recognisable when women are left alone or with

dependents in the home. Valent (1984) documented his personal observations in two

communities over a seven week period immediately after Ash Wednesday in 1983, and wrote

that people felt guilty and ashamed at not living up to roles expected of them. Many people,

including women alone, thought they were going to die, and '...as fear set in among those at

home, intense longing was felt for the absent protectors, which led to frantic telephone calls and

more direct calls through tears and screams' (Valent, 1984).

Often women were left with the sole responsibility for the family and property because socially

determined roles mean that women are likely to be separated from a male in a disaster

(Honeycombe, 1994). A male partner is often fighting fires while a woman cares for dependents.

The tendency of women to evacuate with dependents may put them at greater risk according to a

2007 report which stated that most women perish while sheltering in the house or attempting to

flee and those late evacuations still accounted for most deaths. The same report noted that the

xxii

deaths of women from bushfires have increased over the past 30 years (Haynes, 2007, cited in

DeLaine, et al., 2003).

In her consideration of female mortality in disasters worldwide, Fothergill (1998) provides

explanations from the literature for their higher mortality than men. Her question as to whether

more women died because 'their husbands had the decision-making powers and they did not dare

leave without their husband's permission’ and that ‘women were left responsible for property and

[could have been] afraid of blame and punishment’ could perhaps equally apply to the Australian

bushfire context (Fothergill, 1998).

2.10. Violence against women

Some researchers report that violence against women increases following disasters (Elaine

Enarson, 2000; Molin Valdés, 2009; Palinkas, Downs, Petterson, & Russell, 1993) and that the

evidence to support this is growing (Phillips & Morrow, 2008).

A 1998 review of approximately 100 studies found several studies that indicated an increase in

domestic violence following disaster. For example, after Hurricane Andrew, analysis of domestic

violence helpline statistics showed a 50 per cent increase (Fothergill, 1998). There was an

increase in demand for refuge accommodation, and court cases for injunctions increased by 98

per cent (Wilson, et al., 1998). In the first four months following the earthquake in Dale County,

reports of domestic violence increased by 600 per cent (Wilson, et al., 1998). In Haiti, gender

based violence ‘dramatically escalated’ after the earthquake, with an estimated 230 rapes of

women and girls in 15 of the camps in Port-au-Prince, and with Doctors Without Borders

treating 68 rape survivors in one facility in the month of April (Bookey, 2010).

However, Phillips et al. (2009) assert that some violence, including domestic violence, is

unrecognized and un-recorded in the context of disaster.

2.11. Food Security

Climate-extreme events such as floods may lead to food insecurity and malnutrition in

households, with different human capital impacts for men, women, and children. Because

women are the main providers of food and meals for their families, women may bear a greater

xxiii

burden to fulfill this task when climate events occur. Jungehülsing (2010) assesses the impacts of

hurricanes Mitch and Stan leading to flooding in Chiapas, Mexico, and found that while men lost

income from remunerated work on farms, women lost the fruits, vegetables, chickens, and ducks

from their home yards. These losses seriously affected women’s ability to feed their families

since they previously obtained a significant portion of their daily food from their own yards.

Similarly, Angula (2010) finds in Namibia that during droughts, out of their submissiveness to

their husbands, women first explore other means of ensuring food security before discussing the

matters of food shortage with their husbands. Women were also first to diversify their

livelihoods through basketry, processing nuts and oil, or through sales of their livestock such as

chickens, pigs, or goats to raise money to buy food.

In Burkina Faso, Roncoli, Ingram, and Kirshen (2001) find that heads of household (gender not

explicitly stated) take diverse measures to cope with food shortages due to severe drought. These

include supervising women more strictly in how they handle grain for cooking, using a smaller

container to measure grain or extending the time between grain allocations to women, and

relying on women’s contributions of grain from their own fields or bought with their own

money. When households had exhausted all resources and strategies to obtain food, they pawned

their crops, borrowed money, and women resorted to selling cloth, utensils, and jewelry that they

had set aside for their daughters’ weddings. Goats and sheep belonging to women were sold in

distress sales. In some cases women volunteered these sales and in others the heads of household

seized the animals and sold them. It is not apparent in this study if men specifically parted with

their own assets or households sold off jointly owned assets to cope with the drought.

Examined together, these examples show that climate change may affect the food security of

men, women, and children in different ways, but women and children often suffer more in terms

of health and in terms of growth and development, both which form part of human capital.

During times of climate stress, women in particular are more hard-pressed to provide meals for

their families since they are primarily responsible for household food security and, as evident

here, reduce their food intake so others may eat more, or part with assets such as jewelry and

small livestock or take on additional work to smooth consumption during climate shocks.

2.12. Impacts of floods on health

xxiv

Few studies have empirically tested the differential impacts of climate change on women’s and

men’s physical health. Studies reviewed by the World Health Organization (2009) on the effect

of heat waves show that women in Europe are more at risk of dying, in both relative and absolute

terms, (Kovats and Hajats 2008), with an increased risk for elderly women owing to

physiological reasons (Havenith 1998).

Reyes (2002) examines the effects of the 1997–98 El Nino phenomenon in Peru and explains

that gender inequalities in food distribution and consumption within households were common.

Even during periods where households appeared to have sufficient food, women and children

seemed to have a lesser share of the food. Widespread malnutrition during the El Nino floods

and landslides further exposed these women and children to epidemics such as acute respiratory

and diarrheal infections, malaria, dengue, and cholera. Pregnant women were also recorded to

have a higher risk of contracting malaria, which causes serious complications during pregnancy.

Coêlho (2004) finds that women in a drought affected area are more anxious and emotionally

distressed than men in general. This may be due to difficulties women face to execute their roles

as producers and providers. Mitchell, Tanner, and Lussier (2007) come across similar findings in

the Ganga river basin in India, where psychosocial effects of a flood were more pronounced for

women who, in addition to their distress and losing their support networks, had to look after

other family members.

World Health Organization (WHO) (2002) supports the effects of floods by saying there are

direct and indirect health effects caused by floods. Direct effects are mortality from drowning,

heart attacks and injuries and indirect health effects include infectious diseases, poisoning and

post traumatic stress disorders.

Women may also experience specific health vulnerabilities. Malaria, cholera, impaired

psychosocial health and other health-related impacts in the aftermath of a disaster not only affect

women’s health but also increase burdens on their care responsibility. Increased conflicts driven

by disasters can also increase women’s vulnerability to violence. These and other vulnerabilities

should be assessed and taken into consideration into disaster risk management strategies, since

xxv

men and women have different needs and priorities. For example, women tend to prioritize their

health, safety and resource needs at the household and community levels (Trohanis,

Svetlosakova, and Carlsson-Rex, 2012).

2.13. Early Warning and Mitigation

Floodplains are important locations for settlements almost everywhere in the world and Africa is

no exception. He clearly points out that while regional settlements may have avoided the flood

prone areas; subsequent settlement growth has led to floodplain development. For example, in

Egypt the river Nile floodplain is the most densely populated region of the country and by

comparison the remainder of Egypt is virtually uninhabited. In Mozambique at least twenty

urban centers are at risk of flooding including major settlements along the Zambezi and six

coastal locations.

Douben (2006) states that since ancient times people have settled in flood prone areas due to

favorable geographic conditions which facilitate economic growth, such as accessibility

(transportation) and food production (fertile land). This fact forces societies all over the world to

protect vulnerable assets against flooding. Nevertheless, flooding is still the most damaging of all

natural disasters and more than half of all victims are flood related. Flood mitigation policies and

measures should therefore be implemented in order to enable societies to increase their resilience

to flood hazards.

Sinclair and Pegram (2003) stated that floods cannot be prevented but their devastating effects

can be minimized if advance warning of the event is available. With large increase in population

and increasing urbanization (mainly driven by poverty) there are more people living in informal

settlements, which are often on flood plains as this is the only undeveloped land available near

cities. The people living in these settlements are those who are most at risk, not only due to their

geographical location in the flood plain but also because they do not have the financial resources

to recover from the damage caused by flooding. Early warning information can, therefore, allow

the disaster managers to take steps which may significantly reduce loss of life and damage to

property.

xxvi

Flood risk posses a significant threat to many communities. Whereas measures can be taken to

reduce the likelihood of flooding, the risk can never be eliminated altogether (Crossman, et al.

2006). They point out that in the UK; flood risk represents a significant threat to many

communities. Around 1.8 million households and 140,000 commercial properties in England and

Wales are located in floodplain areas, affecting at least 4-5 million people. They further point out

that a range of flood risk management activities are undertaken by operating authorities. These

include emergency planning, awareness raising, provision of flood warning and creation of flood

storage areas as well as the construction and maintenance of both conventional and innovative

flood defenses. Crossman, et al (2006) suggests that in the face of such increases in risk, the

provision of reliable information and public awareness is essential. There is a clear need for a

continental and deepening partnership between the public and private sectors in managing flood

risk and the potential to extend to it to other areas.

2.14. Coping Strategies

Mirza, et al. (2003) states that flood disaster has different impact on individuals, households and

communities. People cope in different ways. Those who have the capacity after being hit by a

disaster emerge faster while those without such capacity sink deeper into the spiral of

impoverishment. Coping strategies include actions such as migration from floods affected areas,

flood forecasting, flood insurance of animals and crops, food stockpiling, providing emergency

health services and building flood shelters. They have, however, not been woven systematically

into the approach to achieve security from flooding.

If the approaches build on coping strategies and seek to identify new ones, they could address the

social impacts of flood problems affectively at a lower social, economic and environmental cost

than approaches that attempt to manage or control the resource base itself (Mirza, et al. 2003).

In Nepal, every year floods cause death, destroy cultivated fields, irrigation equipment, bridges

and rural infrastructure. He argues that policy makers, donors and relief and development

agencies treat flood disaster as isolated events that break the continuity of the normal way of life.

Most interventions to mitigate disasters are adhoc responses made under the assumption that an

emergency support in the form of relief will help overcome the situation of hardship. Such

xxvii

support aims at restoring the situation to what it was before the disaster. Even when a flood

disaster affects the same community every year, government, donors and Non-governmental

organizations respond by providing the same relief and rehabilitation measures each time. This

approach does not consider the situation of a society during normal times between the

occurrences of two hazard events. Disasters are considered as a coincidence when a hazard

interferes with society.

Ariyabandu and Wickramasighe (2005) suggest that although women are often more vulnerable

to disasters than men (owing to conventional gender responsibilities and relations) they are not

just helpless victims as often represented. Women have valuable knowledge and experience in

coping with disasters. Yet these strengths and capabilities of women are often ignored in policy

decisions and in mitigation, thereby, allowing these valuable resources to go to waste and

sometimes creating dependency situations. Thus ignorance of gender differences has led to

insensitive and ineffective relief operations that largely bypass women’s needs and their potential

to assist in mitigation and relief work.

2.15. Conceptual Framework

The Conceptual Framework identified to guide this study is Disaster Risk Reduction. Disaster

Risk Reduction is the systematic development and application of policies, strategies and

practices to minimize vulnerabilities and disaster risks throughout a society, to avoid

(prevention) or to limit (mitigation and preparedness) the adverse impacts of hazards within the

broad context of sustainable development. As indicated in the introduction, natural disasters and

floods in particular have become frequent and are likely to occur in future due to climate

variability. It may therefore, not be feasible to remove the flood risk .What is important therefore

is to fully understand the flood risk and the associated effects within the framework of Disaster

Risk Reduction. DRR initiatives may include efforts to reduce hazards (land use zonation,

structural measures), reduce the vulnerability (better housing, diversified livelihoods) and/or

enhance the capacity to deal with them (savings, access to credit, insurance). Non-structural

measures, such as community based risk assessment, awareness building, early warning systems,

livelihood diversification and strengthening are important elements of DRR.

xxviii

Figure 2.1: Conceptual framework for Climate and DRR Check Source: Social Development Commission, (2011)

Through the Disaster Risk Reduction framework, this study identified three factors which were

used – Preparedness, Response and Recovery. These factors work together to eliminate the

disaster risk. These call for countries and organizations to manage and mitigate disaster risk

through preparedness measures and pre-disaster recovery planning. Particular focus is placed on

ensuring that systems for emergency relief, response and recovery are in place. Reducing disaster

risk includes advocating for governments and organizations to allocate resources to preventing

and responding to disasters, as well as providing support to draft and amend policies, laws, and

governance arrangements for emergencies caused by natural hazards. Figure 1.3 shows factors

that were used in the study to reduce the risk of disaster occurring such as early warning systems,

land use planning (migrating to uplands), resource planning, putting in place rescue team,

damage mitigation and financing of community organization to manage the risk.

2.16. Chapter Summary

In this chapter, the Climate and Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) model and the concept of

sustainable livelihood were used to explain the multiple impacts of floods on all women and

vulnerable people. From the literature on the impact on global level, impact on Africa, direct and

xxix

indirect impacts, and impact on the household, impact on children, impact on the elderly and

impact on governance it is clear that floods have considerable negative impacts on the population

and some sectoral economic activities. Floods have direct and negative effects on households’

production and exchange entitlements by decreasing the quantity, quality, and income earning

activities. This study‘s review of existing literature highlights the diversity of ways in which

floods affect livelihoods as well as the devastating ways in which women are impacted and how

they respond to the disaster. To mitigate the impact of floods on the vulnerable members of the

society such as women as indicated in the literature review, calls for good governance and

workable policies that benefit the poor.

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

xxx

3.0. Introduction

This chapter focuses on field research. The methodology used in this study will be described as

well as the rationale for the study design. In conclusion, the ethical considerations and limitations

regarding the study are explained.

3.1. Research Approach

For the purpose of this study inductive approach was adopted. This was because the survey

method allowed a group of respondents to be selected from the larger population through

probability sampling. This enhanced accurate inference about the larger population from a small

sample. The survey method also enabled many respondents to be reached within a short space of

time considering the size of the study area.

3.2 Research Strategy

The study strategy was based on a case study of Lower shire districts of Chikwawa and Nsanje.

The main criteria for research site selection were flood exposure, resettlement patterns, land use

change and embankments.

3.3. Source of Data

The data sources for the study were both primary and secondary. The primary source included

observations, interviews and questionnaire administration. The secondary source included

newspapers, existing books, institutional documents, internet sources and other related

documents.

3.4. Sample Selection and Size

To get the individual respondents, a multi-stage sampling technique was used. Given the large

size of the study area, the first stage involved selecting six major areas affected by the annual

floods. This was then followed by using random sampling procedure to select households from

each of the six major areas. Thirdly, a maximum of one respondent was selected from each

household and given a questionnaire to answer or be interviewed where necessary using

xxxi

interview guide. The adoption of the simple random procedure was based on the fact that the

population is homogeneous in which all members are identical and therefore a sample of one will

be a representative of the population regardless of the size of the population. The Disaster

Preparedness and Management Officer, the chief, an Environmental Officer, heads of Basic

Schools and other opinion leaders were purposively selected and interviewed.

The sample size of one hundred and eighteen (150) was drawn from Chikwawa and Nsanje

districts which are located in Lower Shire. This represents a (11.76 %) of the affected population

of 1275. The sample size is supported by Babbie, (2005). He is of the opinion that for a

population of 1000 and above, a sample size of 10-20% is acceptable. Women and School going

girls were the main target. A total of five (5) and one (1) Key Informant Interviews were

conducted at community and district levels respectively.

3.5. Data collection Procedure

Structured questionnaires, interview schedule and personal observations were used to collect the

primary data. The questionnaire was made up of both close and open-ended questions. The

questionnaires for the individual households were grouped into four sections, namely,

demographic characteristics, impacts of floods on women and girls, causes of vulnerability and

copying strategies.

The researcher, before administering the questionnaire first sought official permission from the

appropriate stakeholders. The next was to make the respondents aware of the objectives of the

study.

The survey method was supported with direct observation. The interview schedule was also used

to seek information from the assemblyman, chiefs and other opinion leaders. The questionnaire

and the interview schedule for the study was also pre-tested in one of the selected communities.

This helped in the identification of problems to be encountered and remedies were provided.

3.6. Data Analysis and Presentation

xxxii

The field data was first processed by editing and checking to ensure that everything is complete.

These were then fed into a computer to get cross tabulation using Microsoft Excel.

Analysis of the output/data involved describing, summarizing and interpreting the data obtained

from each unit. The data was presented using tables and charts.

3.7. Scope of the Study Area

Lower Shire is located in southern end of Malawi. Lower Shire has two districts; Chikwawa and

Nsanje. They are all in the low-flat land. As a result, they are prone to natural disasters. Floods

in Malawi are mainly due to lakes flooding and rivers overflowing, increasing sediment deposit

in river channels, reservoirs and floodplains, originating from catchment degradation. The

consequences are loss of arable land, and damage to irrigation infrastructure and destruction of

public infrastructure. The economy also gets affected as can be seen in table 1 below.

Table 3.1: Estimated losses per sector and in annual GDP in 2015

loss (Million Kwacha) Loss (%)

Agriculture 5 901.0 1.02

Crop and Animal Production 5 862.0 1.51

Fishing and Aquaculture 39.0 0.24

Electricity & water supply 338.2 1.61

Commerce 3 603.7 1.47

Health 134.2 0.33

Total loss 15 878.2 0.55

Source: GoM, 2015

Although severe floods occur mainly in six river basin systems, the highest flood frequency is in

the Lower Shire Valley, mainly in Chikwawa and Nsanje districts, due to flooding of the Shire

River which joins the Zambezi River in Mozambique. Flooding is exacerbated by high rainfall

due to La Niña events (cold ocean temperatures affecting atmospheric circulation), and to

tropical depressions/cyclones originating in the Mozambique Channel or the Indian Ocean,

xxxiii

causing widespread, torrential rainfall and flooding.

Nsanje is one of the poorest districts in Malawi and is virtually dependent on government and

NGO aide organizations. Major income comes from small holder farming. Maize, millet,

sorghum, rice, and cotton are all grown using almost entirely rain fed agriculture. The district

covers an area of 1,942 square kilometres (750 sq mi) and has a population of 194,924 (NSO,

2008)

In 2014/15 floods most areas of Nsanje and East Bank in Chikwawa were submerged under two

to three meters of water, which transformed these vast plains into a giant lake engulfing houses

and bridges,” said Amaury Gregoire, MSF’s mission head in Malawi’s south (Daily Times;

February 27, 2015).

Chikwawa district which is part of Lower Shire covers an area of 4,755 km² and has a

population of 356,682 (NSO, 2008). The district reported secondary flooding which occurred

following rains of 26 and 27 February, 2015. A total of 191 households (approx. 1000 people)

were displaced and were being housed at Bereu and Sekeni in the district. Tents were provided to

the displaced population at the sites. Some people were reported to have died from the floods

while others were missing.

Figure 3.1: Displaced people at Sekeni in Chikwawa

Source: Internet

At the end of 2014 and into January and February of 2015 over one million people were affected

countrywide. 336,000 people displaced, 645 injured, 172 missing and 104 confirmed dead

xxxiv

(UNICEF, 2015).The government had had to divert resources from critical developmental

programmes in order to mitigate the negative effects of the floods.

Despite the increase in frequency and magnitude of floods, no impact assessment study of the

women and girls has been undertaken to establish the underlying causes of their vulnerability.

The study, therefore, came up with recommendations and mitigation measures that will assist in

dealing with the impacts of floods on women in the long term and sustainable manner, given the

problem outlined in above.

3.7 Ethical Considerations

Smith (1988:283), highlights that the integrity of research, whether scientific or humanistic,

refers to the extent to which researchers adhere to the standards or rules of scientific research.

The standards of conducting research include appropriate methods of collecting and analysing

data and generally agreed upon ethical guidelines for collecting, analysing and publicizing

research.

Ethical considerations for this study included gaining permission from the District Disaster

Preparedness and Management Officer in Nsanje and Chikwawa to conduct a study at their

councils and were assured that they would be given feedback on the findings of the research after

completion. The aim of the study was explained to the participants. Prior to the interview,

participants were informed that participation was voluntary, and that they had the right to

withdraw from the study at any time, should they feel like doing so. The reason was because

flooding is a sensitive issue. The required consent letter developed for the research contained

information explaining the participants’ rights to anonymity and confidentiality (see Appendix

1).

3.8 Limitations of the study

In order to conduct and complete this study in a meaningful and manageable way with the

available funds, time and resources, some limitations have been identified, especially in

methodology. The recognized limitations are as follows:

1. The data collection was restricted to six areas in the Nsanje and Chikwawa districts in

Malawi, which may fail to represent the actual scenario of the whole country as people

xxxv

develop their livelihood strategies and flood coping measures according to the concrete

situation they face.

2. Accessibility was also a challenge as the data collection was done during the rainy season.

3. Due to limitations of time and other resources, it was not possible to work with a larger

sample and the respondents were limited in terms of size and composition. Only 140 rural

women were considered for the study from a population of 1275 women.

3.9. Chapter Summary

In conclusion, both quantitative and qualitative approaches were employed for the study.

Structured and open-ended questionnaires were used to collect primary data. However, the

analysis took into account both primary and secondary data especially for January 2015 floods

data.

CHAPTER 4: SURVEY FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

4.0. Introduction

xxxvi

This chapter presents how the gathered data was organized, presented and analyzed. It also gives

the interpretation of results. The findings relate to the research questions that guided the study.

The findings were presented in a clear and concise form, most which used graphs and tables.

The researcher’s final respondents were lowered into one hundred and five (150) from the

expected number of one hundred and ten (140) due to the absence of some respondents upon data

gathering.

4.1. Findings from Primary Data

This data collected from targeted women the study area through questionnaire. The findings are as below.

4.1.1. Household Demographics

The demographic distributions are such that out of the one hundred and forty (140) households

sampled 70.8% were married, 16.4% were widowed, 5.7% were separated, 5% divorced and

2.1% were single as can been shown in table 4.1.

Table 4.1: Marital Status of the sampled women and girls

Marital Status Total Number of participants

Percentage

Single 3 2.1Married 99 70.8Widowed 23 16.4Separated 8 5.7Divorced 7 5

In terms of the ages of the heads of households, the survey findings show that most of them were

aged between 30 – 39 years and as shown in figure 4.1 below.

xxxvii

Figure 4.1: Age Groups of Household Heads

Furthermore, the research also revealed that household size of the sampled households was

mostly between 3 to 6 persons (63%).

4.1.2. Sources of Household Income

The research revealed that the first most important source of income for the assessed

communities in Lower Shire were crop production (79.4%) followed by livestock (12%) and

Casual labour (3.8%) before the floods. After the floods the first most important income sources

for the assessed communities in Lower Shire was casual labour (35%) followed by crop

production (31%) and livestock (15%) (See figure 4.2. below).

Figure 4.2: Comparative Analysis on the Sources of Income of the Sampled Households

xxxviii

Discussions at district and community levels established that the main source of income for most

households was crop production followed by casual labour in sugarcane fields and small

businesses. The main sources of food were found to be own production, followed by casual

labour and small businesses. The implication is such that since crop production is the main

source of livelihood and food, increased exposure to floods will exacerbate their vulnerabilities

by compromising their households’ food security.

Figure 4.3: Comparative analysis of livelihood diversity in terms of marital status

It was observed the marital status of household head played an important role in determining the

livelihood strategy. Those who were married had a diversity of livelihoods (crop production,

trading, beer brewing, fishing and livestock) as opposed to the single, divorced, separated and

widowed household heads (see figure 4.3 above). Furthermore, only a small percentage of the

sampled households do not depend on crop production as a livelihood source.

4.1.3 Impact of floods on Crop production

Most of the sampled households (90%) indicated that their crop fields were damaged by floods.

xxxix

It was also evident that of the crops which were damaged by floods, most of it (96%) was the

main staple crop (maize). This was followed by Sorghum at 29%. Although no data on area

planted was collected, it was evident that there was impact on agriculture which is the main

source of livelihood and income as discussed under the source of income patterns section.

Figure 4.4: Households that Experienced Crop Damage due to Floods by Marital Status

Furthermore, the marital status of households who experienced much of the crop damage due to

floods were found to be married (71.3%) and widowed (14.3%) (See figure 4.4 above). The

implications are such that there will be reduced staple crop production which will result into

reduced food availability. This finding has provided better understanding of the vulnerability of

the households due to the over dependency on crop production as their main livelihood source.

Furthermore, of the 16% household heads whose marital status is widowed and had experienced

reduced production due to flood damage did not have alternative livelihood options other than

crop production to mitigate the food insecurity as can be seen in figure 4.4 above. Out of the 140

sampled households, 30% indicated having experienced food stock losses due to floods. The

research also revealed that within the households whose crops and food stocks were damaged by

the floods, 93% resided in the flood prone areas.

4.1.4 Impact of floods on Food and Nutrition

xl

Table 4.2: Information about capacity for buying food during disasterCapacity Frequency PercentageSufficient capacity 16 11.43Insufficient capacity 42 30No capacity 82 58.57Total 140 100

Table 4.2 shows that most of the respondents (58.57%) had no capacity for buying food. 30

percent had insufficient capacity and only 11.43 percent has the capacity to buy food during and

after disaster. They become vulnerable due to loss of their food, assets, livestock, agricultural

production and loss of job.

Figure 4.5: Comparative analysis of number of meals per day before and after floods

Figure 4.5 presents the number of meals per day for sampled women respondents. It illustrates

that majority of the respondents used to eat three times a day before the floods (53%) but they

reported that after the floods they were eating once per day (57%) due to shortage of food. Food

scarcity was identified as an acute problem after flood and shortage of food led to malnutrition

among the flood-affected women. Approximately 87 percent of the women surveyed faced

widespread food scarcity during and after floods. During times of food scarcity, 92% of sampled

households indicated that only children were given food at the expense of everybody.

xli

Women complained that government and organizations reacted with vigor only on the onset of

floods. They distributed food stuffs in assisting them to recover. However, the food given was

not enough for most of the families which could only take them few days before it last. They also

stopped assisting them way before their recovery. This resulted in most of them accumulating

huge amount of debts which they were failing to pay back.

4.1.5. Impact of floods on General Health

The research revealed that most of the sampled households (96%) indicated that health facilities

were available in their communities. Furthermore, very few households (2%) had indicated that

health facilities had been damaged by flooding in their communities. The study further revealed

that 32% of the sampled households experienced disruption in access to health services due to

damaged roads and bridges as well as lack of drugs in health centres as a result of floods.

Figure 4.6: Diseases women and girls suffered during and after floods

The study revealed that 40% of the respondents said women and girls were suffering from

malaria followed by diarrhea (35%). 8% of women complained of skin diseases such as scabies.

6% said elder women were suffering high blood pressure related conditions. There were no

respondents reporting STDs or HIV/AIDS. The government, medical relief workers and

volunteering doctors had so far staved off outbreaks of cholera. About 80% of women

xlii

complained that there were little to no drugs in the health centres/hospitals and hospitals on the

other hand were overburdened and struggled to accept referrals.

A quarter of respondents reported distance as being the biggest impediment to accessing

healthcare, and less than ten per cent gave other reasons such as being unable to afford

associated costs, lack of transportation, lack of female staff or security concerns.

4.1.6 Impact of floods on Water and Sanitation

The sampled women showed a lot of diversity on the type of drinking water sources they had. It

was evident that rainy water, rivers, boreholes and shallow wells were the most common water

sources that communities used for drinking (see figure 4.7 below).

Figure 4.7: Common sources of water for sampled households

The survey established that 69% of the households indicated that their main source of drinking

water was the unprotected wells followed by borehole and river at 11% and 8% respectively.

Furthermore, among the sampled households, 80% indicated that their common water sources for

drinking were affected by floods.

xliii

The survey further established that 74% of households whose main source of drinking water was

the unprotected wells had household members falling ill followed by 14% of households who

indicated borehole as their main source of water. This means that households will continue to be

vulnerable to increased disease outbreak as long as unprotected wells continue to be their main

source of drinking water. This is as a result of increased contamination that occurs during

flooding.

Despite borehole being the safest water source for drinking, past vulnerability assessments

undertaken within the districts have shown that handling of the water by households due to

distance to the source has led to increased disease burden such as diarrhea and cholera.

Figure 4.8: Sanitary facilities of the sampled households

In terms of sanitary facilities, 66% of the sampled households had no sanitary facilities (i.e. using

bush and rivers as alternatives). Furthermore, 34% of the households indicated having traditional

pit latrines as their main sanitary facilities (see figure 4.8 above). Within the households that

indicated having sanitary facilities, 31% had indicated that their facilities were damaged by

floods.

4.1.7. Impact of Floods on Education

xliv

Education is one of the most important indicators for socio-economic development and educations also improve the occupational structure of the societies. Level of education determines the level of occupation and level of income.

All the sampled households indicated availability of education facilities in their communities.

Furthermore, 17% of the sampled households indicated that school infrastructure was damaged

due to floods in one way or another. The study showed that 38% of the sampled households

indicated that school going children experienced disruption due to floods.

Figure 4.9: Factors that affected class attendance of school going children

The disruption was attributed to various reasons such as blown off roofs (32%), school being

occupied by the displaced (31%) and school being submerged (17%).

xlv

Figure 4.10: School Dropout Rate for School Going Children

73% of the sampled households indicated that school dropout rates for girls were

higher than for boys. This would result in more women failing to read and write which in the

long run, heighten the vulnerability of women and girls and limit their ability to benefit from

information campaigns and early warning systems. This therefore results in more women failing

to take challenging leadership positions so that they can make their own decisions for their

wellbeing.

4.1.8. Impact of Floods on Protection and Access to Justice

xlvi

Figure 4.11: Security and safety of sampled households with adolescent girls

Figure 4.11 presents the level of protection and access to justice. It illustrates that majority of the

women experience domestic violence (42%) followed by increased number of early marriages

(33%) for girls after the floods.

During FGD, it was found out that in of flood, both husband and wife were not able to produce

or earn more as they could, and therefore it was easy for them to have some tensions among

themselves. Moreover, drinking alcohol contributed to such violence as emphasized by the

farmers. Women groups claimed that their spouses drank more during flood citing that they did

not have much thing to do. Women claimed that the levels of violence increased due to the

frustration felt by men who were unable to fulfil their socially constructed gendered roles of

protector and provider.

Girls expressed their specific challenges in the context of disasters as including forced child

marriage and teenage pregnancy. In some cases they said that they were forced by their parents

to get married to reduce the stress on the family to provide food and other necessities during

times of disaster. Other girls stated they choose to get married early so that they have a husband

who can provide for them. A girl from Bereu reiterates this:

“Men do entice us with money that can meet our daily needs, and you can never say “NO” when

you see the money at hand whilst you have nothing, not even parental support.”

Table 4.3: Information about getting warning signal of disaster

Getting signal Frequency PercentageYes 23 16.4No 117 83.6

Total 140 100Source: Field work

The above table shows that 117 respondents (83.6%) do not get any signal of floods. Only 16.4

percent respondents get signal of floods. It means that most of the women do not get warning

signal of floods due to lack of modern weather forecasting technologies such as radio, T.V and

so on. Most of the inhabitants of Lower Shire areas depend on the indigenous technology for

xlvii

getting the signal of floods. Cloud cover, wind direction and speed, fog, water color and

temperature, rising water level bear the signs of flood, rainfall and drought. Movement and

behavior of insects and animals bear the signal of the disaster, as ants with eggs in the mouth

start climbing up for shelter before flood; grasshoppers fly unitedly before heavy rain and storm;

if dog cries in pathetic voice flood will come and/or food crisis will prevail; if fox calls in day

time, crow calls at night flood or a storm will soon take place. Still today, the Lower Shire

people, excluded from modern information system, do apply indigenous techniques to face any

disaster.

4.1.9. Ways of Accessing Flood Information

Figure 4.12: How women access flood/relief information before, during and after floods

Figure 4.12 reveals that women know of the impending event or relief news using the following

means: by listening to village messenger (37%), by listening to the radio (20%), by being told by

their friends (14%) while CSOs has contribution of (3%) in informing the women of impending

floods or food relief in their areas. Furthermore, women also hear about impending disasters

from village meetings called by the chief, district committees, chiefs’ counselors and agriculture

extension workers.

xlviii

The study has also shown that key stakeholders are concerned only when the disaster occurs.

They are more reactive when they were supposed to be proactive to floods so that people are able

to get the required information before it is distorted.

4.1.10 Underlying Causes of Women Vulnerability

Figure 4.13: Main causes of women vulnerability in time of floods

There were varying underlying causes of vulnerability to floods for most people in Chikwawa

and Nsanje. Women identified following fertile soils in flood prone areas and lack of alternative

livelihood as the main underlying causes of vulnerability (29%) followed by lack of decision

making power (17%) as can be seen in figure 4.13 above.

According to FGD, women said that they had no powers to decide where to live, which to some

extent it is a contributing factor to their vulnerability. Their husbands decide for them. They also

said that the situation is further complicated by the village heads that turn down any suggestion

to relocate to upper lands fearing that they will lose their chieftainship. Households said that the

main reason why relocation is failing is because when they move to the upper land, they are only

xlix

given land for constructing houses without land for agricultural activities. Village heads and their

subjects do not surrender part of their productive land to flood victims. Ownership of land and

size of land holding are the important socio-economic determinant for rural societies. Size of

land holding reduces the level of poverty and provides self employment opportunities.

4.1.11. Coping Strategies

Figure 4.14: Security and safety of sampled households with adolescent girls

The survey established that sampled households employed a range of coping strategies due to the

floods. The most important coping strategies were cultivating on small portions on higher

grounds (56%), migrating to higher grounds (23%) and raising the floor of the house (12%). (See

figure 4.14 above).

The survey established that households whose coping strategies were cultivating on small

portions on higher grounds and migrating to higher grounds had small business and casual labour

in Illovo sugarcane fields as their main livelihood. The implication is such that these households

would employ other livelihood options to cushion the impact of the floods.

l

4.2. Findings from Secondary Data

On average 80% of different sources sampled, indicated the impact of floods on women and girls

as early/forced marriages, increased violence against women, sexual harassment, loss of

education for girls, poor health and sanitation, loss of lives, lack of security especially in camps,

loss of food and increased debt burden. Women were not allowed to leave their homes or camps

without the permission from their husbands. However, they had literally nothing to give their

kids and families to eat. Pregnant and lactating mothers had been fighting against quite a lot of

problems at flood relief camps.

The various data sources showed varied causes of vulnerability of women but common among

them were poverty, residing in flood prone areas, lack of alternative livelihood(s), following

fertile soils in flood plains, lack of decision making power, lack of dikes, lack of land for

resettlement upland. It was further found out that the coping strategies of women and girls during

floods included: migration from floods affected areas, cultivating on small portions on higher

ground, raising the floor of the house, flood forecasting, flood insurance of animals and crops,

food stockpiling, building flood shelters in advance, living with relatives during floods, working

in fields of the host community.

4.3. Response Rate

The sample size of the survey was 150 respondents. However, due to accessibility factors, only

140 respondents participated in the exercise representing the response rate of 93.3%.

4.4. Chapter Summary

The study established that floods impacted on women’s critical aspects such as agriculture,

health, education, housing, security, water and sanitation and property and assets. The paper

identified, following fertile soils in flood prone areas and lack of alternative livelihood as the

main underlying causes of vulnerability (29%), followed by lack of decision making power

(17%). The study further found out that the coping strategies employed by female headed

households were majorly a function of four factors namely: cultivating on small portions on

li

higher grounds, temporal migration to higher grounds, doing manual work in cane fields and

raising the floor of the house.

lii

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.0. Introduction

This chapter presents the conclusion and recommendations that arose from the study. The

research reviewed a wide range of secondary literature and collected primary data on which the

conclusion and recommendations are based. The study was conducted within the Disaster Risk

Reduction conceptual framework which emphasizes a proactive approach to disaster

management. It is imperative that communities adopt a risk reduction approach to effects of

floods. The research endeavored to answer the following questions:

What is the impact of floods on women and girls in Lower Shire?

What are the causes of vulnerability of floods to women and girls?

What coping strategies can mitigate the effects of floods?

The conclusion and recommendations are outlined below:-

5.1 Conclusions

Lower Shire is frequently affected by disasters, of which floods are the most common. Women

are more affected by flood-induced vulnerabilities, experiencing deficits in food, clothing,

communications, fuel wood, and increases in disease exposure, water quality problems, and

sexual harassment. During floods women face various difficulties and challenges. Particularly,

women have to go through hardships for want of fuel and food for their regular activities. They

also suffer from increased incidence of disease, including eye infection, cholera, dysentery, skin

diseases and diarrhea. Apart from these difficulties, women experience specific types of

economic crisis, poverty, and insecurity.

The study revealed that various categories of female headed households exist in the community

and it was clear that floods had adverse impact on the livelihoods mainly during the 2014/15

floods. The staple crops were destroyed and this affected household food security. The flood

coping strategies adopted by the households range from forced temporary migration from the

flood plains to changing means of livelihood to another. To a large extent, the study has

established that flood sustainability and depth have a vital role on livelihood patterns. It is also

evident that there are varying underlying causes of women’s vulnerability in flood and this poses

liii

a challenge for reducing or minimizing vulnerability. Following fertile soils, lack of alternative

livelihoods, lack of decision making power and poverty are identified as being the main

underlying causes of vulnerability for the women in Lower Shire. The analysis of variance

indicated that there is significant difference among households in terms of their coping strategies

to flood. A principal component analysis identified three major factors that influence flood

coping strategies as poverty level, vulnerability of farm lands/properties to flood disaster and

lack of alternative livelihood. Chief among the coping strategies included cultivating on small

portions on higher grounds (56%), migrating to higher grounds and raising the floor of the house.

It is noteworthy that although there are some current floods coping strategies being practiced by

female headed households in the community, there are not very effective. Discussion with them

established the fact that the coping strategies were not sustainable especially forced temporary

migration and borrowing of funds. The local community’s coping strategies/capacities should not

be under estimated but rather built upon. The major focus must be on improving the livelihood

condition of female headed households especially during and after the floods.

The study has further demonstrated that effects of floods in one sector can affect other sectors of

society. For example, under the health section, the outbreak of different diseases (malaria,

diarrhoea and coughing) was attributed to the impact of floods on water sources and sanitation

facilities. The issue of water contamination of the river at the pick of floods and the handling of

water from the borehole increase the health risk. Furthermore, although some health facilities

were not damaged, accessibility to health services was a problem due to infrastructure (roads and

bridges) damage.

Overall the objective of the study as outlined in chapter one (1) have to a large extent been

realized. Government and key co-operating partners should implement the recommendations

proposed in this study.

5.2. Recommendations

liv

Therefore we can approach to some ways or solutions in this chapter to highlight some policy

considerations, practical orientations and as well as awareness building which, if implemented,

could play an important role in flood risk management. The following considerations are

recommended from this study:

There is need to review the land ownership to empower those in flood plains of the river

Shire to relocate to the upper lands in the community or government should identify land

where village heads should be able to maintain their status and households have land for

farming.

Assistance to flood victims should be extended beyond just the period of flood.

Programmes to assist their rehabilitation/recovery long after the flood is to be established

both at the level of the government, community and kindred.

There is need for government to be more proactive than reactive by considering giving

out small grants for community’s pre-disaster project activities in order to reduce disaster

losses.

Community based flood warning systems that will aid livelihood sustenance should be

developed. Flood forecasting and warning system should be adequately planned and

implemented, and preparedness programs should be developed for disaster management.

Gender-friendly toilet facilities such as separate toilets at shelter centers and portable

toilets should be made available at the shelters or flood refuges, or temporarily

constructed during flood periods.

Flood resistant crops and the distribution of these seeds in flood prone areas can be

introduced with special emphasis on women’s home-based crop cultivation.

For maintaining livelihoods women can be provided with financial supports to rear cattle

and engage them in other income-generating activities. Improvement of the functioning

of various community committees, including the sanitation and nutrition committee,

lv

family planning committee, protecting from violence and early marriage committee, and

school managing committee should be ensured. Each committee should include women

and consider women’s resilient

The social, economic, psychological, and health related problems faced by women can be

reduced by taking several steps. Laws should be implemented with legal support to

prevent violence against women.

Construction of dams should be considered to trap the excess water. This could be used

for irrigation.

5.3. Consideration for further research

There is clearly a need for more research into the human adjustment to the flood hazard, particularly in terms of the perception and behavioral responses to floods. The aspect of early warning and how the information is utilized (what action is taken by the community when the warning is issued) should be investigated.

There is need for further investigation (environmental impact assessment) on the proposal to construct canals in the flood affected area especially that floods are a natural phenomenon.

5.4. Practical Contribution

This research paper will be used as a reference material for scholars in assignments and research.

The study has also offered solutions to problems associated to flood occurrence that can be

initiated and implemented by local people. The paper also calls upon government and NGOs to

assist by giving out small grants direct to community organizations in supporting activities that

require funding such as Construction of river walls, water detention and retention structures,

Construction of evacuation centre, Planting of trees/vertiver grass along the rivers, streams and

around houses, Training communities in (1) information sharing, (2) evacuation planning, (3)

applying sandbags or water pumps for flood protection, and (4) volunteering to help

communities in flood mitigation or response, Training people especially women to establish

lvi

Village Savings and Loans (VSL) groups so that they can venture into small businesses to ably

reduce the sufferings in times of floods and drought and Covering all open wells with concrete.

These activities will build capacity of local people to prepare, mitigate and recover from disasters

especially floods and drought.

5.5. Chapter Summary

In this chapter, major conclusions and recommendations for the paper were made, followed by

the practical contributions of the study.

REFERENCES

Ariyanbandu, M.M. and Wackramasinghe, W.M. 2005. Gender Dimension in Disaster

Management: A guide for South Asia: Sri Lanka.

lvii

Asian Disaster Preparedness Centre. (2004). Channels of Communication – a Challenge: Public

Awareness for Flood Preparedness in Bangladesh

Back, E., Cameron, C. & Tanner, T. (2009). Children and Disaster Risk Reduction: Taking stock

and moving forward. Research Report. Institute of Development Studies: UNICEF.

Barredo, J. I. (2009). Normalised Flood Losses in Europe: 1970 – 2006. Italy: European

commission Joint Research Centre: Institute for Environment and Sustainability.

Bradshaw S. and Fordham M. (2013). ‘Women, Girls and Disasters’, A Review for DFID.

Retrieved on June 24, 2015 at: www.gdnonline.org.

Bradshaw, S. (2001a). ‘Reconstructing roles and relations: Women’s participation in

reconstruction in post-Mitch Nicaragua’, Gender and Development, 9 (3), 79–87.

Bradshaw, S. (2013a) Gender, Development and Disasters. Edward Elgar: Northampton.

Branswell, B., Fisher, L. & Macleans. (1996). Floodwaters on rampage, 109: 1-5. Available

from UFS: Database: Academic Search Complete.

Buvinić, M. (1999), ‘Hurricane Mitch: Women’s needs and contributions’, Inter-American

Development Bank, Sustainable Development Department Technical Papers Series,

available at: http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=816307. Retrieved

on August 26, 2015.

Champ, P. (Ed.) (1983). Planet Earth Flood. USA, Amsterdam: Time-Life Books.

Charles, M .N. (2004). Environmental Education Association of Southern Africa, 21: 50 – 60.

Davis, E. and K. Rouba (2012), ‘Out of sight, out of mind: Women’s abilities and disabilities in

crisis’, in E. David and E. Enarson (eds.), The Women of Katrina: How Gender, Race and

Class Matter in an American Disaster, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 76–89.

Deen, T. (2010) ‘Famine Marriages – Just one by-product of climate change.’ webpost 9/3/10

on www.globalchange.me

Delaney, P. and E. Shrader (2000) ‘Gender and post-disaster reconstruction: The case of

hurricane Mitch in Honduras

Dewi, A. 2007. Community-Based Analysis of Coping with Urban Flooding: a Case Study in

Semarang, Indonesia. International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth

Observation. Enshede. The Netherlands.

Duramy, B. F. (2011) ‘Women in the Aftermath of the 2010 Haitian Earthquake’, Emory

International Law Review, 25, 1193 – 1215 Available at:

lviii

http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/eilr/25/25.3/Duramy.pdf. Retrieved on

September 6, 2015.

Eriksen, C., Gill, N. and Head, L. (2010) “The gendered dimensions of bushfire in changing rural

landscapes in Australia” Journal of Rural Studies, 26 (4), 332–342.

FEMA. (2004). Making Schools Safe against Floods.

Finucane, M. L., Slovic, P., Mertz, C.K., Flynn, J. and Satterfield, T. A. (2000) Gender, race, and

perceived risk: The 'white male' effect, Health, Risk & Society, 2 (2), 159-172

Fordham, M. (2006b). Unpublished Field Notes: Pakistan 2006, for International Federation of

Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, World Disasters Report

Fothergill, A. (1996) ‘Gender, risk and disaster’, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and

Disasters, 14 (1): 33-56.

Gill, S. (2004). Literature Review: Impacts of Climate Change on Urban Environments. Draft

Copy.

Government of Malawi (2015). Malawi 2015 Floods Post Disaster Needs Assessment Report.

Lilingwe: GFDRR.

Grunfet, E. (1995). Hydro meteorological, impacts and Management of Extreme floods. (Paper

presented at a workshop on long term social and economic impacts of extreme floods at the

University of Colorado in November, 1995). Colorado springs, USA.

GSDRC (2013) Helpdesk Research Report: Violence against women and girls in Haiti,

Governance and Social Development Resource Centre

Gustafson, E. (1998) ‘Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological

Perspectives’, Risk Analysis, 18: 6

Haney et al. (2007) Haynes, K., Handmer, J., McAneney, J., Tibbits, A. and Coates, L. (2010)

“Australian bushfire fatalities 1900–2008: exploring trends in relation to the ‘Prepare, stay

and defend or leave early’ policy” Environmental Science and Policy, 13 (3), 185–194.

Ha-Redeye, O. (2006) “Engendering” Change in Disaster Response: Increasing Women in

Leadership Roles’ in Provost, M (ed) International Centre for Emergency Management

Studies 2006 Gender and Disaster in Canada: New Thinking, New Directions, record of

proceedings, October 31st to November 2nd, 2006

Hoffman, S. (1998), ‘Eve and Adam among the embers: Gender patterns after the Oakland

Berkeley Firestorm’, in E. Enarson and B. Morrow (eds.), The Gendered Terrain of

Disasters, Westport, Connecticut and London: Praeger, 55–62.

lix

Holland, P. (2008). An economic analysis of flood warning in Navua, Fiji. Pacific Islands

Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC), Suva.

IDMC. (2011). Briefing paper on flood-displaced women in Sindh Province, Pakistan. Available

at: http://www.internal-displacement.org/briefing/pakistan (accessed 17/05/13)

IFRC .(2012a). World Disasters Report: Focus on forced migration and displacement,

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, 2012

Ikeda (1999) Ikeda, K. (1995) ‘Gender Differences in Human Loss and Vulnerability in Natural

Disasters: A Case Study from Bangladesh’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 2: 171-93.

ISDR, (2005). ISDR (2009), ‘Adaptation to climate change by reducing disaster risks: Country

practices and lessons’, Briefing Note 2, New York: UNISDR. Available at:

http://www.unisdr.org/files/11775_UNISDRBriefingAdaptationtoClimateCh.pdf. Retrieved

on September 6, 2015.

IUCN (2004). Disaster and gender statistics. Available at:

http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/disaster_and_gender_statistics.pdf. Retrieved on August

20, 2015.

Jonkman, S.N. and I. Kelman. (2005) ‘An Analysis of Causes and Circumstances of Flood

Disaster Deaths’. Disasters, 29(1), 75-97.

Linneker, B. and Quirós Víquez, A. (2005) Critical Reflections on Progress Towards the

Millennium Development Goals in Nicaragua, International Cooperation in Development –

ICD and Centro de Información y Servicios de Asesoría en Salud - CISAS, Managua,

Nicaragua, September 2005

Living with Risk (2006): A global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives, Geneva

Switzerland.

Masters of Disaster. (2007). Floods, Background. The American National Red Cross.

Mazurana, D., Benelli, P., Gupta, H. and Walker, P. (2011) Sex and Age Matter: Improving

Humanitarian Response in Emergencies.

Moser, C. (1993) Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice, and Training. London:

Routledge.

Mwape Y. P. (2009). An Impact of Floods on The Socio-Economic Livelihoods of People: A

Case Study of Sikaunzwe Community in Kazungula District of Zambia. Zambia: DiMTEC.Nobel de Silva, S. (2006), ‘The trauma of tsunami-affected women in Sri Lanka’, in M. Domroes

(ed.) After the Tsunami: Relief and Rehabilitation in Sri Lanka, New Delhi: Mosaic Books,

lx

pp. 61–70.

Nott, J. (2006). Extreme Events: A Physical Reconstruction and Risk Assessment. Cambridge

University Press. New York.

NSO. (2008). 2008 Population and Housing Census. Zomba, Malawi: NSO.

Oxfam (2005). ‘The Tsunami’s Impact on women’, Oxfam Briefing Note, Oxfam International,

available at http://www.preventionweb.net/files/1502_bn050326tsunamiwomen.pdf

Oxfam (2012) ‘Post-Earthquake Response and Reconstruction Gender-Sensitive Advocacy in

Indonesia’ Gender Equality In Emergencies October 2012

Paper, http://www.soroptimist.org/

Peterson, K. (2007). "Reaching Out to Women When Disaster Strikes." Soroptimist White

Pistrika, A. & Tsakiris, G. (2007). Flood Risk Assessment: A Methodological Framework.

National University of Athens. Greece.

Plan (2011) Weathering the Storm: Adolescent Girls and Climate Change. Plan International,

UK

Plan (2013) Because I am a Girl, Plan International, UK (forthcoming)

Rabalao, R.T.(2010). The Social, Psychological and Economic Impact of Flooding in Ga-Motla

and Ga-Moeka Communities of Moretele District in North West Province, South Africa.

Report on the Regional Stakeholders’ Consultative Workshop on Disaster Risk Management,

(2004). Report on The Regional Stakeholders Consultative Workshop on Disaster Risk

Management held in December, 2004 in South Africa.

Sen, A. (1990), ‘More than 100 million women are missing’, in New York Review of Books, 37

(20).

Smith, G. J. (1999). Floods. An Environmental Health Practitioner’s Emergency Management

Guide. Department of Human Services. Australia.

Southern, R. L. (1979). The Global Socio-Economic Impact of Tropical Cyclone. Perth: Regional

Office: Bureau of Meteorology.

Stojaspal, J., Gunther, U., Wosnitza, R., Porter, H., Quinn-Judge, P., Zarakhovich, & Yuri.

(2002). Raging Waters, 160: 1-7. Time Europe. Available from UFS: Database: Academic

Search Complete.

The Zambia Vulnerability Assessment Committee (ZVAC) Lusaka. (2007). Rapid Flood Impact

Assessment Report. Zambia.

lxi

Tyler, M. and Fairbrother, P. (2013). Bushfires are “men’s business”: The importance of gender

and rural hegemonic masculinity, Journal of Rural Studies 30, 110-119

UNFPA. (2012). From Childhood to Womanhood: Meeting the Sexual and Reproductive Health

Needs of Adolescent Girls. Fact Sheet: Adolescent Girls’ Sexual and Reproductive Health

Needs, https://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/factsheets/srh/EN-SRH%20fact

%20sheet-Adolescent.pdf

UNFPA (2013) 'Report Calls for Sharper Focus on Adolescent Sexual Health Needs in

Humanitarian Response' UNFPA, June 2013

http://www.unfpa.org/public/cache/offonce/home/news/pid/14406;jsessionid=ADE2F06CEC

94974F6847E99631288728.jahia02

UNHCR, (2011). Driven by Desperation: Transactional Sex as a Survival Strategy in Port-au-

Prince IDP Camps, Haiti: Port-au-Prince http://www.urd.org/IMG/pdf/SGBV-UNHCR-

report2_FINAL.pdf

United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization: United Nations Environment

Programme. (2004). APELL and Floods. A communists – based approach for disaster

reduction.

UNOCHA. (2013). OCHA Gender Toolkit Available at:

http://www.unocha.org/what-we-do/policy/thematic areas/gender-equality. Retrieved on July

18, 2015.

USAID. (2007). USAID Provides Flood Assistance to Mali. Press Release s.a. October 2007

Ward, R. 1978. Floods: Focal Problems in Geography: A geographical perspective. London:

The Macmillan Press Ltd.

WEDO (2008) Gender, Climate Change and Human Security: Lessons from Bangladesh, Ghana

and Senegal, Prepared for ELIAMEP, May 2008 www.wedo.org/wp-content/uploads/hsn-

study-final-may-20-2008.pdf

Whittaker, J., Handmer, J. and Mercer, D. (2012). Vulnerability to bushfires in rural Australia: A

case study from East Gippsland, Victoria 2012 Journal of Rural Studies, 28 (2), 161–173

APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Letter of Approval

PERMISSION LETTER TO THE VILLAGE HEADMANFor the Administration of Research Questionnaire

lxii

From: Lickson Mchepa

To: The Village headman/Camp leader, ____________________

Date: 17th December, 2015

Dear Sir/Madam, The undersigned is currently conducting a study on the “An Assessment of Impact of Floods on

Women and Girls in Lower Shire Area in Southern Malawi” as a requirement for the completion

of Master of Arts in Development Studies.

The respondents of this study are the people of your village/camp. I would like to give the

questionnaire to those who will be randomly chosen to be the respondents of this study which are

women and girls only.

In connection with this, I would like to request your approval to allow me to schedule the

administration of the research. I look forward for your much needed approval on this request.

Respectfully yours,

The Researcher

Appendix 2: Letter for the Respondents

LETTER FOR THE RESPONDENTS TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE IN IMPACTS OF FLOODS ON WOMEN AND GIRLS

December 17, 2015

lxiii

Dear Respondents:

The researcher, a student of Pentecostal Life University, I am presently conducting a research

study entitled “An Assessment of Impact of Floods on Women and Girls in Lower Shire Area in

Southern Malawi” as a requirement for the completion of Master of Arts in Development

Studies.

In this connection, I would like to request you to be one of my respondents in our study. I hope

you can help me by answering the questions sincerely and truthfully. Rest assured that all your

responses will be kept confidential.

However, participation in this study is voluntary, and that you have the right to withdraw from

the study at any time, should you feel like doing so.

Thank you very much for your cooperation.

Very truly yours,

The Researcher

Appendix 3: Household QuestionnaireIMPACT OF FLOODS ON WOMEN AND GIRLS IN LOWER SHIRE AREA IN SOUTHERN MALAWI

Questionnaire No. _________________________________

Community Name _________________________________

District Name _____________________________________

Date of Interview __________________________________

1. Household Demographics

lxiv

1. Age of Head of Household 1 = Below 15yrs2 = 16 – 19 yrs3 = 20 – 39 yrs4 = 40 – 59 yrs5 = Above 60 yrs

2. Marital Status of household head

1 = Single2 = Married3 = Divorced4 = Separated5 = Widowed

3. Household Size – How many people eat and stay in the household permanently?3a: Male: ____ 3b : Female:____

2. Socio-economic Livelihood strategy

1. Which are the two most important sources of the HH income before the flood?1. Crop Production2. Fishery3. Livestock4. Labour work5. Govt. service6. Private employee7. Private business8. Vendors9. Beer brewing10. Charcoal burning11. Support from families12. Other, specify:

2. Which are the two most important sources of the HH income after the flood?1. Crop Production2. Fishery

3. Livestock4. Labour work5. Govt. service6. Private employee7. Private business8. Vendors9. Beer brewing10. Charcoal burning11. Support from families12. Other, specify:

3. Who is the primary income earner in your house?1. Head of household2. Spouse of HH3. Son4. Daughter5. Male elder6. Female elder7. Other, specify:8. Don’t know

lxv

3. Flood Impact

3.1. General Loss

1.Was your property/assets lost or destroyed due to the flood?

1. Yes2. No

If yes list property lost/destroyed:1. Bed 2. Fishing Net 3. Boat/ Canoe4. Bicycle 5. Radio 6. Plough 7. Hoe 8. Ox – Cart 9. Television10. Chairs 11. House12. Others; specify:______________

3.2 What effect have you felt on HH expenditures compared to before and after the flood?1. Food: increased, decreased, same2. Water: increased, decreased, same3. General health: increased,

decreased, same4. Maternal health; increased,

decreased, same5. Health related to disabled members:

increased, decreased, same6. Clothes: increased, decreased, same7. Reconstruction: increased,

decreased, same8. Education: increased, decreased, same

3.2 Health

1. What are women and girls’ primary health problems at present? (Can select 5 options)?

1. No Disease2. Anaemia and other nutrition related ill

health3. Diarrhoea4. Fever5. Physical injuries6. Disabilities7. Bleeding8. Miscarriage9. Delivery related problem10. Respiratory problem11. Skin infection12. Skin rashes13. STD/HIV14. Mental health: anxiety, distress15. Other, specify

3. Do have health facilities in area?1. Yes

2. No

4. What are the two most significant obstacles to women’s ability to access health care in the present scenario?1. Distance to nearest health care facility is too far2. Security reasons3. No female health staff4. Personal health issues (disabilities, injured, etc)5. No transportation6. Can’t take time off work7. Can’t take time away from home and child-care responsibilities8. Can’t afford it9. Other, specify:

5. Was there any disruption in accessing health services during?

1 = Yes 2 = No

3.3 Crop Production

1. Did the household experience crop damage during the floods?1 = Yes 2 = No

2. Was the main staple crop the one which was damaged? 1 = Yes 2 = No

3. Did the household experience any loss of food stocks during the floods? 1 = Yes 2 = No

3.4 Food and Nutrition1. Do you have capacity to buy food for

the household?1. Yes2. No3. Insufficient capacity

2. On average, how many meals do you have per day before and after the flood?

Before after 1. 0 6. 02. One 7. One3. Two 8. Two4. Three 9. Three5. Three or more 10. Three or more

3. If there is a food shortage in the house, whose food needs are prioritized?

1. Mother/wife2. Father/husband3. Boy children4. Girl children5. Elderly women6. Elderly men7. Other, specify

4. If there is a food shortage in the house, who is least likely to get food so that others can?1. Mother/wife2. Father/father3. Boy children4. Girl children5. Elderly women6. Elderly men7. Other, specify8. Don’t know

3.5 Water and Sanitation

1. What is your common source of drinking water?1. Borehole 2. Protected well 3. Unprotected well 4. River 5. Spring 6. Other (Specify)_________________________

2. Was the main source of water affected by the floods? 1 = Yes 2 = No

3. What are the factors affecting access to domestic water use?1. High water price2. Damage of the water networks3. My community is not served by a

water network4. Insufficient water supply, specify:5. Other, specify:6. None, the household is on the water

mains supply

4. What type of sanitary facilities do you have?1. VIP

2. Sanplat 3. Reticulated Sewerage 4. Traditional Pit latrine 5. Others(Specify)_________________________

5. Do you feel safe and comfortable to use latrine/bathing facility?1. Yes

2. No

If NO, explain:

6. Was your sanitary facility affected by the flood water? 1 = Yes 2 = No

3.6 Education: questions for household with adolescent family members

1. Was there any damage to school infrastructure (classroom blocks, teacher’s houses, toilets) due to the floods? 1 = Yes 2 = No

2. Did any of the school going children in your household experience any disruption in an attendance due to the floods?1 = Yes 2 = No

3. What are the factors affecting/affected school attendance?

1. School destroyed2. Lack of school uniform/clothing3. Displaced4. Violence at school/university5. Sexual harassment at school6. No separate latrine available7. Feeling of insecurity8. Road Impassable 9. Bridge Culvert washed away or

Submerged 10. School submerged/ surrounded by

water 11. Other, specify

3.7. Protection and Access to Justice

1. What are the main safety/security problems faced by women and girls?1. Domestic violence specify2. Sexual harassment3. Being trafficked4. Travelling alone long distances5. Early marriage6. Incest7. Honour killings8. Other, specify

2. Where do female survivors of violence go for help?1. To their mothers2. To their fathers3. To other family members4. Health clinic5. Private clinic

6. Legal aid7. Community leaders8. Friends9. International/local NGOs10. Community centers11. Police12. Other, specify13. Don’t seek help

4. How often do the following listed below occur compared to before and after the flood?

Increased , decreased, same1. Domestic violence against wife2. Domestic violence against son/daughter3. Early marriage

4. Sexual harassments5. Honor killings6. Incest7. Trafficking8. Other, specify:

6. Where do you go for help?1. To parents

2. To other family members3. Legal aid4. Community leaders5. Religious leaders6. Friends7. International/local NGOs8. Community centers9. Others, specify:

3.8. Access to Information and Assistance, Participation

1. Do authorities give you warning signal about all impending floods?

1. Yes 2. No

2. How do you get flood/relief information?1. From a friend2. Radio3. TV channel

4. Civil Society Organisation5. Department of Disasters6. Church/mosques leaders7. Others (Specify) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. Causes of Vulnerability

4. What are the underlying causes of vulnerability?1. Residing in a flood prone area. 2. Poverty 3. Lack of alternative livelihood(s) 4. Following fertile soils in flood plains5. Lack of decision making power6. Lack of dikes7. Lack of land for resettlement

5. Coping Strategies

5. What are the main coping strategies that you employ during floods? Rank them in order of importance.1. Migration from floods affected areas, 2. Cultivating on small portions on higher ground3. Raising the floor of the house4. Flood forecasting, 5. Flood insurance of animals and crops, 6. Food stockpiling, 7. Building flood shelters in advance8. Others (Specify)_________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. Are the above coping strategies effective? 1 = Yes 2 = No