impact of child detention in occupied palestine - save the children report - march 2012 en
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
1/98
2012
Sweden
THE IMPACT OF CHILD DETENTION:
OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
2/98
1
Save the Children Sweden
oPt Ofce for the Middle East and North Africa
Beit Hanina P.O. Box: 25042 Shufat
97300 Jerusalem
E-Mail: [email protected]
Website: http://mena.savethechildren.se/mena
East Jerusalem YMCA Rehabilitation Program
29 Nablus Road
P.O Box 19023 East Jerusalem
E-Mail: [email protected]
Website: http://ej-ymca.org
Save the Children Sweden & EJ-YMCA Rehabilitation Program 2012
Save the Children ghts for childrens rights. Wedeliver immediate and lasting improvements to childrenslives worldwide.
Our vision is a world in which all childrens rights are
fullled. Save the Children works for:a world which respects and values each child, a worldwhich listens to children and learns, a world where allchildren have hope and opportunity.
The East JerusalemYMCA Rehabilitation Program(EJ-YMCA RP) shall strive to enhance the living conditionsof those traumatized, tortured and injured, and those
with physical disabilities, to facilitate their integration/re-integration into society and empower them to play theirnatural role in the community development process.
Designed By: Muneer HidmiPrinted By: Modern Arab Press
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
3/98
2
Save the Children Sweden works to protectand promote childrens rights throughout
the world. The UN Convention of theRights of the Child has always been theguide throughout our work, giving childrenthe right to express their concerns in all
freedom. Making childrens voices heard isone of the most important objectives forSave the Childrens work.Ever since the start of the rst Intifada in1987 the situation for Palestinian children
living in the occupied Palestinian territory
(oPt) has been deteriorating. Childrensright to protection, education, health andtheir right to survival and development areconstantly being threatened and violated.
In 1990 Save the Children Sweden in oPtpublished a rst report about The statusof Palestinian Children during the uprisingin the occupied territories, describing thedevastating impact collective punishment
and collective measures taken by the IsraeliAuthorities during the First Intifada onchildren and their families.During the Second Intifada in 2003, Save theChildren Sweden published the interview-
based report, One Day in Prison FeelsLike a Year; where Palestinian Children telltheir own stories about detention. Childrenfrom the West Bank spoke about the rights
violations they were subjected to in Israeli
prisons and how they saw their future. Twoother reports portraying the challengesfaced by Palestinian children were GrowingUp Under Curfew and Living Behind
Barriers Palestinian Children Speak Out.In these reports, children describe theimpact the ongoing conict had on theireveryday lives.In the present report, The Impact of Child
Detention Save the Children Sweden isagain shedding a light on the situation of
Palestinian children in detention. We seek togive Palestinian Children the opportunity to
describe in their own words the reality theylive in after being held in detention. We alsowant to ensure that childrens rights are beingupheld, therefore in the concluding sectionof the report Save the Children addressesa number of messages to the international
community, the government of Israel andthe Palestinian National Authority. We willalways strive to prevent children from beingdetained or ill-treated.
Much of the content of the reportsummarizes the ndings and results ofseveral studies that were conducted toassess the impact of detention on children,families and communities over the lastfour years. Research materials included
reports such as The Social Rehabilitationof Palestinian Child Ex-Detainees: A LongRun to Freedom, and many other studies
and fact sheets.Most of the information was gathered throughthe implementation of the Post-traumaRehabilitation of Palestinian Ex-DetaineeChildren in the West Bank Programme,which aims at facilitating the re-integration
process of ex-detainee children into theircommunities by enhancing the psychosocialwell-being and coping capacity of ex-detaineechildren. The programme is implemented
by the EJ-YMCA in partnership with Savethe Children Sweden, and funded by theEuropean Commission Humanitarian Aidand Civil Protection department (ECHO).Save the Children has much to offer tochildren living in conict areas, and is in
constant search of new ways to record anddocument its experiences and make themavailable to advocate and ght for childrens
rights.On behalf of Save the Children, I am happy
Foreword
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
4/98
3
to extent the appreciation to all who madethis report possible:
Firstly and utmost, to all children and theirfamilies who were willing to be interviewedfor this report and who were brave enoughto share their traumatizing experiences, in
order for us to have a personal insight intothe suffering of Palestinian child detainees.Secondly, all external consultants researching
previous data and the EJ-YMCA staffmembers for their input and facilitation,especially Nader Abu Amsha, Fadia Saleh and
Mona Zaghrout, and for their contributionin implementing the programme.Thirdly, special thanks to SCS team MichelleWarriner, Simine Alam, Feletcia Saleh, DanaIsawi and Karen Mets for their support
and contribution in the development andimplementation of the programme.Furthermore, much appreciation for thesupport of ECHOs ofce in Jerusalem, and
to all authors and researchers mentionedin the bibliography: for their work andefforts for the improvement of the rights ofchildren in the oPt and all over the world.And last but not least: Sincerest thanks
to Kete N. Shabani for her dedication,devotion and enthusiasm in interviewingand transcribing childrens testimonies,analyzing data, previous ndings and thelegal frameworks as well as writing this
report.
This report is dedicated to all Palestiniandetainee and ex-detainee children, with thewish that one day they will fully enjoy thetaste of freedom.
Jerusalem, 15th of January 2012
Mr. Eyad Al ArajCountry Director,
Save the Children Sweden
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
5/98
4
What would you like to tell the world?
I want the world to know, that they
should take care of themselves, so that
what is happening to us, wont happento them!
M. O., 12-year-old child
ex-detainee from Silwan
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
6/98
5
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ACRI Association for Civil Rights in Israel
CAT Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading
Treatment or PunishmentCBO Community-Based Organization
CRC UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
DCI-PS Defence for Children International Palestine Section
DFID UK Government Department responsible for Promoting Development andthe Reduction of Poverty
EJ-YMCA RP East Jerusalem Young Men Christians Association RehabilitationProgram
GCIV (Fourth) Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Personsin Time of War
ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
IDF Israeli Defense Forces
MENAMiddleEast and North Africa Region
MoDEDA Ministry of Detainees and Ex-Detainees
MoEHE Ministry of Education and Higher Education
MoI Ministry of Interior
MoJ Ministry of Justice
MoSA Ministry of Social Affairs
NGO Non-governmental Organization
OCHA UN Ofce for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
oPtoccupied Palestinian territoryPCL Palestinian Child Law
PLO Palestinian Liberation Organisation
PNA, PA Palestinian National Authority
SC Save the Children
SCS Save the Children Sweden
UDHR Universal Declaration of Human Rights
UN United Nations
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
7/98
6
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 10
ChildDevelopmentAndBasicNeeds .............................................................................................................. 11
MethodologyAndObjectives .................................................................................................................................. 12
ChildrenInArmedConict ...................................................................................................................................... 15
ChildrenInTheOccupied PalestinianTerritories ................................................................................. 16
DetainedChildrenAndChild Ex-Detainees ............................................................................................. 17
Brieng: ResponseApproach .................................................................................................................................. 41
SaveTheChildrenSwedensWorkApproach ........................................................................................... 41
EJ-YMCAsWorkApproach ....................................................................................................................................... 43
LegalFramework: Detention................................................................................................................................... 19
InternationalLaw............................................................................................................................................................... 19
NationalLegislativeFramework.......................................................................................................................... 24
Israel ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 24
WestBank.............................................................................................................................................................................. 24
EastJerusalem ...................................................................................................................................................................... 26
PalestinianNationalAuthority .............................................................................................................................. 29
SaveThe
Childrens
Work
Regarding
Juvenile
Justice
Under
Palestinian
Jurisdiction
33
ChildProtectionThroughArtAndLiterature ......................................................................................... 33
ChildJustice .......................................................................................................................................................................... 34
PsychosocialRehabilitation OfChildrenInConictWithTheLaw ..................................... 34
Role OfMajorDuty-Bearers .................................................................................................................................. 35
IsraeliAuthorities ............................................................................................................................................................... 35
GovernmentalDuty-Bearers: MoDEDA, MoSAAndMoEHE ...................................................... 36
FamilyUnit ............................................................................................................................................................................. 36
CivilSocietyActors ......................................................................................................................................................... 37
LessonsLearnedAndRecommendations ................................................................................................... 38
Table Of Contents
Chapter 3
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
8/98
7
Chapter 4
Role OfCommunityInRe-IntegrationProcess....................................................................................... 72
LessonsLearnedAndRecommendations.......................................................................................................73
Chapter 6
PsychosocialResponse...................................................................................................................................................62
ThePost-TraumaRehabilitation OfPalestinianEx-DetaineeChildrenInTheWestBankProgramme...................................................................................................................................... 62
Areas OfInterventionAnd GeographicalDistribution OfBeneciaries.......................... 64
Recruitment OfBeneciariesAndProblems.............................................................................................. 66
CounsellingApproach..................................................................................................................................................... 68ChildFocused: Psychosocial, Educational, Career-Focused............................................................ 68
FamilyIntervention........................................................................................................................................................... 68
Impact OfRehabilitation.............................................................................................................................................. 69
Impact OfChildDetention ....................................................................................................................................... 46
Impact OfChildDetentionOnChildren ..................................................................................................... 49
ChildrensRightTo SocialAndCulturalLife ................................................................................................ 51
ChildrensRightTo ProtectionFromFamilySeparation .................................................................. 52
EducationAndCareer ................................................................................................................................................... 53
Impact OfChildDetentionOnFamilies................................................................................................................ 57
Impact OfChildDetentionOnCommunities .......................................................................................... 59
Chapter 5
Conclusion.............................................................................................................................................................................. 73
Limitations............................................................................................................................................................................... 74
Bibliography............................................................................................................................................................................ 75
Chapter 7
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
9/98
8
This caricature was drawn by the ex-detainee child Hasan Abadi
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
10/98
9
What it feels like to live here you ask? Its like being a
shadow of your own, caught on the ground, not being able
to break out and you see yourself lying there, but you
cannot ll the shadow with life.
R. R., detained at the age of 17
Picturetakenbyanex-detaineeboy.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
11/98
10
UNCRC Principles
Childrens rights
are:
Universal
Indivisible
Inalienable
Introduction
Childhood: While all adults go through thisphase, it seems to be a distant memory for
most of them. The question ofwho a childis and where childhood begins and ends isa complex one. Under the UN Conventionon the Rights of the Child (CRC), all humansunder the age of 18 are to be consideredas children, unless the relevant national lawcan be applied to children of a younger age.This denition includes stages of maturitysuch as adolescence and youth.
Israel ratied the CRC in 1991 its contentis in line with the legislation and denitions
when applied toIsraeli citizens, butin contradictionto the lawwhen appliedto Palestinians.The CRC is a
milestone in theprotection andacknowledgement
of childrens rights. It is the rst timeinternational law has acknowledged childrenas independent human beings with rightsof their own, and not simply as propertyof their parents. Within the 54 articles ofthe CRC, the status of children as rights-bearers was consolidated for the rst time
in the frame of an international instrumentthat is legally binding. The CRC embodiesthe four following principles: childrensrights are universal (they apply to everychild regardless of race, sex, religion orpolitical views), they are indivisible (thereis no hierarchy within the rights, they areequally important and interdependent) andinalienable (children have those rights;
they cannot be taken from them). Overall,these rights are unconditional;
children do not have to behave in a certainway or meet certain demands in order tomerit their rights. They apply to everychild without any limitations or conditions.Nevertheless, a supportive environment isneeded to cater for the rights of the childas stated in the Convention.
In past centuries, a child was perceived
simply as a miniature version of an adultand the concept of the developmental stageof childhood was widely unrecognised.Today, this perspective, especially with theestablishment of the CRC, has changed, butis still far from being satisfactory; a child hasto be regarded as a human being with specialneeds, specic rights, a person with a lowerlevel of maturity and, therefore, in need ofdistinctive attention and protection.1
1 Speech by Ms Maud de Boer-Buquicchio, Deputy
(...) a child means everyhuman being below the ageof eighteen years unlessunder the law applicable tothe child, majority is attainedearlier.Article 1, UNCRC
Children are not mini-people. They have rights- not mini-rights. Maud deBoer Buquicchio, Deputy SecretaryGeneral, Council of Europe1
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
12/98
11
This report aims at giving an insight into thetreatment of children in armed conict, witha primary focus on children in detention.The rst chapter gives an overview ofinternational and national legislative
frameworks that apply to the situation ofPalestinian children in detention, followedby an identication of major duty-bearersand their responsibilities. The second partof the investigation will address the impactof detention on a) children, b) their familiesand c) their respective communities. Thesendings are based on in-depth interviewsand focus groups with children from
all over the West Bank, including East Jerusalem. The third component will givean overview on psychosocial responses,as provided by Save the Children and theEJ-YMCA, whereas the last part discussesthe role of community in the re-integrationprocess of children and presents a list ofrecommendations when dealing with thissubject.
Child Developmentand Basic Needs
Children go through differentstages of development. The Swisspsychologist, Jean Piaget, viewed thecognitive developmental stages as aconstant re-construction of cognitive
abilities provoked by external stimuli.2
Furthermore, childhood is regarded as ahighly diverse life phase and is not simplyinuenced and shaped by biological orpsychological stimuli and processes, but
Secretary General of the Council of Europe. Heading tothe Justice for children Decade? FRA Conference on
Ensuring justice and protection for all children, Brussels,7-8 December 2010. URL: http://www.fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/attachments/FRC10_speech_Maud%20de%20
Boer%20Buquicchio.pdf (last access: 24th
June 2011)2 Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1966). The Psychology of theChild. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.
also, and more importantly, by personaland environmental factors. Inconict regions, children are exposedto very disruptive external factors thathave a huge impact on their personal
life, development and environment.According to the American psychologist,Abraham H. Maslow, every human beingis motivated by his or her needs andthese needs have different categories
and hierarchy levels. His main premiseis that adults and, to a greater extent,children have to have their lower-levelor basic needs be met in order to moveon to higher needs. Hence, if low-level
needs such as food, clothing, water,sleep, and safety are not met, reachinghigher-level needs becomes moredifcult and, therefore, our potential inall areas of development is more likelyto encounter stagnation.3 Furthermore,under stressful conditions, or whensurvival is threatened, one can regressto a lower need level.
3
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. NewYork: Harper & Row. 15-31.
Interpretation of Maslows pyramid of needs as applicable to children
Self-actualization
Morality, creativity.
spontaneity
Esteem
Self-esteem, condence, achievement,
respect of others, respect by others
Social/Group Belonging
Friendship. family
Safety
Security of the body. resources, morality. the family, health,
property
PhysiologicalBreathing, food, water, sleep, adaptation of the body to the external temperature, excretion
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
13/98
12
Other crucial factors in thedevelopment of children are: trustingrelationships, positive guidanceby family or a healthy environment,a secure and stable environment
itself, play and leisure to develop anddiscover personal abilities, as well asthe structures and working processesof their surroundings. In armed conictregions, or in (chronic) emergencysituations, these needs are severely andcontinuously put in danger, leading to adisruptive environment and thereforeto a far from ideal frame for the healthy
development of children.
Methodology and
Objectives
The ndings of this report are based onthe following methodological approach:
Desk review and focus groupdiscussions
Firstly, relevant literature, reports, surveys,statistics and background information byvarious sources have been reviewed.
Further, the report is based onbackground documents on detainedand formerly detained children, which
Save the Children and the EJ-YMCAcollected and analyzed for the evaluationof the Post-trauma Rehabilitation ofPalestinian Ex-detainee Childrenin the West Bank Programme.Hereunder fall:
The Baseline Study, whichwas conducted in June 2009,and involved 186 ex-detainee
children, 104 families and 58
members of CBOs; The Post Assessment Survey,
which was conducted in May2010 and involved 173 ex-detainee children, 89 families
and 73 members of CBOs; The Mid-term Evaluation
report, which was conducted inMarch 2011 and involved 38 ex-detainee children, 39 mothersof ex-detainee children as wellas in-depth interviews withprogramme counsellors andCBO members;
The Final Evaluation report,which was conducted in June2011 and involved 39 ex-detainee children.
One major component was the FinalEvaluation, which includes a seriesof focus group discussions with ex-detainees, EJ-YMCA counsellors, schoolcounsellors, and community membersselected from 11 districts. Furthermore,individual interviews were conductedwith Save the Children, MoDEDA,MoSA, TRC and DCI-PS. In additionto focus groups with programmecounsellors, school counsellors, andCBO participants, they were asked tocomplete a survey before the start ofthe focus groups to estimate percent
agreement on key issues, and to verifyconclusions drawn from focus groups.
Internal database review
For this report, the EJ-YMCAs progress
and monthly reports, as well as the
internal database of beneciaries and
achievements of the programme, have
been taken into consideration.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
14/98
13
In-depth interviewsAdditionally, in-depth interviews withex-detainee children from all over theWest Bank, including from the areas ofTulkarem (1), Qualqiliya (1), Jerusalem
(1), Ramallah (1), Hebron (1), Bethlehem(2) and Jenin (1) as well as in-depthinterviews with families of ex-detaineechildren from the areas Jerusalem (1),Jenin (1), Hebron (1) and Bethlehem (1)were conducted and will give an insightinto individual experiences.
The analysis of the post-detention
consequences for this report wasbroken down into ve main categoriesof childrens environment based on vemain childrens rights: childrens right towell-being, right to education, the rightto protection from family separation,right to social and cultural life, andright to future professional career (seedepiction below).
The aim of this report is to examineand present the impact of detention onchildren, families and their communities,as well as to present the ndings
on the impact of the Post-traumaRehabilitation of Palestinian Ex-detainee Children in the West
Bank Programme. In addition, thereport aims to inform policy-makersto better support detainees andex-detainee children and stimulateadvocacy to protect these childrenthrough legislation and policy.
Lastly, this report is a call to endthe arbitrary arrest and detention
of children less than 18 years of
age and to release those detained
without cause and those detained on
baseless charges, in adherence to the
change of the Israeli military order
that denes the age of a child.4
4 Haaretz. (October, 2011). URL: http://www.haaretz.com/
print-edition/news/following-criticism-idf-raises-age-for-palestinians-to-be-tried-as-minors-to-18-1.388197 (lastaccess: October 13, 2011)
Right topsychosocialwell-being of
the child
Following a child-rights based approach the various effects of detention have beenbroken down into ve main categories referring to ve basic child rights;
Right to haveand enjoy a
family
Right tosocial andcultural life
Right toeducation
Right tofuture
professionalcareer
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
15/98
14
He (the soldier raiding the house) told my father:
Bring him in or we will shoot him.
H. Y., detained at the age of 17
Picturetakenbyanex-detaineeboy.
Picturetakenbyanex-detaineeboy.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
16/98
15
5
As mentioned previously, child protection,regardless of the nationality of the childrenin question, needs a special focus worldwide.More specically, with regard to childrenengrossed in armed conict, the measuresand efforts put into the protection ofchild rights are of the utmost importance.Children seek protection in their networksof social support, in a stable and secureenvironment and in the encouragementand understanding of their surroundings.
However, new political, economic and socialrealities in conict-ridden societies/regions,or in (chronic) emergency situations,severely threaten the well-being of children.They undermine the external factors ofa childs life, weakening or completelydestroying what is needed in order toensure a healthy environment for the mostvulnerable societal demographic, children.Political crisis and socioeconomic collapseform the patterns and characteristics ofcontemporary armed conicts. It is whenpublic order is disintegrated, that a wholesociety, and children in particular, areexposed to the harmful consequences ofarmed conicts, i.e. major physical, moral,cultural, human and social destruction.Children can be killed, injured, maimed,permanently disabled, arrested or detained
during combats and clashes with militaryforces. Huge numbers of children in armedconict regions are deprived of their basicmaterial and emotional needs and torn fromfunctioning families and social structures,adding to their psychological misery. War,armed conicts and/or emergencies erode
5 Graca Machel for UNICEF (2001). The Impact of Waron Children: A Review of Progress Since the 1996 United
Nations Report on the Impact of Armed Conict onChildren. URL: http://www.unicef.org/graca/ (last access:June 19, 2011)
every right of a child, as stated in the CRC.The right to life, the right to be with their
family and community, the right to health,the right to the development of personalityand the right to nutrition and protectionare the primary concerns, but are by nomeans the only rights which war and armedconict infringe upon.2005 was a groundbreaking periodof development, concerning theacknowledgment of the suffering of childrenin armed conict. It was then, that the UN
established a monitoring and reportingmechanism (MRM), with Resolution 1612,
Many people around theglobe say that we are raisedfor war, in order to justifyactions against our people.To those I want to say: wewere born and raised in anever ending war.
Palestinian Child
Children in Armed conict
Picturetakenbyanex-detaineeboy.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
17/98
16
to report on grave violations againstchildren in armed conict. The monitoredviolations include: killing and maiming;recruitment and use of children, attacks onschools or hospitals, rape or other forms
of sexual violence, abduction of childrenand the denial of humanitarian access.In addition to these violations, the MRMWorking Group in oPt collects data onforced displacement, arrest and detention.
Children in the occupied
Palestinian territories
The situation in the oPt remains alarming.Out of the total population of 4.05 Million,41.3% are children under the age of 15.6 At2.9%, the Palestinian territories have one ofthe highest rates of natural increase in theworld. Needless to say, the pernicious
6 Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics: Child StatisticsSeries (No. 14, 2011). Palestinian Children - Issues and
Statistics Annual Report, 2011. URL: http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_PCBS/Downloads/book1740.pdf (last access:June 22, 2011)
nature of armed conict has a negativeimpact on the lives and the development ofchildren. In fact, the ongoing conict and theinstability it produces affects childrenslives in all aspects. They are subjected
to a number of violations of their rightson a daily basis, including killing, maiming,torture, abitrary arrest and detention, homedemolitions, discrimination, harassment and
restrictions of the movement of people andgoods. They are also vulnerable to violencein their communities, homes and schools.7In addition to the political circumstances inwhich Palestinian children have to grow up
in, socioeconomic factors only add to themisery: 11% of children under the age of 5suffer from chronic malnutrition. In 2010,80.1% of Palestinian households had one ormore children, out of which 26.9% of thosechildren lived in poverty and more thanhalf of them lived in deep poverty.8
7 Save the Children, Programme Summary 2011, URL:http://mena.savethechildren.se/PageFiles/3827/SCS%20OPT%20Programme%20Summary%202011.pdf (last access:
September 17, 2011)8 Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics: Child StatisticsSeries (No. 14, 2011). Palestinian Children - Issues and
Statistics Annual Report, 2011. URL: http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_PCBS/Downloads/book1740.pdf (last access:June 22, 2011)
Total number of Palestinian children in Israeli detention at the end of
each month since Jan 2008 (Note: These gures are not cumulative)
Source: DCI-PS Detention Bulletin, Issue 23, November 2011
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 327 307 325 327 337 323 324 293 304 297 327 342
2009 389 423 420 391 346 355 342 339 326 325 306 305
2010 318 343 342 335 305 291 284 286 269 256 228 213
2011 222 221 226 220 211 209 202 180 164 150 161
050
100150200250300
350400450
NumberofPal.children
in34raelide5en
6on
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
18/98
17
Detained children and
child ex-detainees
Thousands of Palestinian children have
been affected by violence related to armedconict. The onset of the Palestinian uprisingin September 2000 resulted in prolongedexposure to a staggering array of extremepolitical stressors, ranging from relentlesspunitive measures imposed on the occupantsof the territories to the pervasive traumaticexperiences of losses of life or limb, lossesof freedom (e.g. detention), and losses ofproperty (e.g. demolition of houses). Among
those who were affected were childrenwho were arrested and detained in Israeliprisons. Since the commencement of thesecond Palestinian uprising in 2000, theIsraeli military forces have arrested anddetained over 80009 Palestinian children,many of which are as young as 12 years old.These children are interrogated, arrestedand prosecuted in the Israeli military courtsystem. Cases of ill-treatment, torture
and physical and verbal harassment duringdetention, although alarming, are frequentlyreported.10 Usually children are arrested atnight or in the early morning. Blindfoldedand with their hands tied behind their backs,they often are forcibly taken, either to Israeliprisons or settlements within the West Bankfor interrogations. These interviews, almostalways take place without the childs lawyeror parents present. While in most cases the
allegations concern stone throwing, a generalopacity about the quality (or existence) of theevidence regarding these and other chargesremains. The way minors are treated byIsraeli military forces and courts is in serious
9 The total estimation derives from an estimated numberof 700 detained Palestinian children per year. This number
is based on the gures provided by the Israel Prison Service(IPS) and Defence for Children International - PalestineSection (DCI-PS)10
Defence for Children International - Palestine Section(March 2011). Palestinian Child Prisoners. Hearing EuropeanParliament Sub-Committee on Human Rights.
violation of the UN Convention on the Rightsof the Child, the Fourth Geneva Convention,the UN Convention Against Torture and,
in the case of East Jerusalem, against theIsraeli Youth Law and a vast number of otherhuman rights instruments. Detention is avery stressful experience for children, usuallyaffecting their psychological well-being, withlong lasting implications, which indicates aneed for a special intervention.11
11 Mid-term Evaluation Report (March 2011). Save theChildren-Sweden & EJ-YMCA Rehabilitation Program. Post-
trauma Rehabilitation of Palestinian Ex-detainee Children inthe West Bank Programme.
In 2010 alone, 1,200 Palestinian children were
investigated on suspicion of throwing stones.
The youngest boy detained in 2011 in East
Jerusalem was 7 years old.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
19/98
18
In prison you function like a robot. There, you dont have a
name, you only have a number.
D. S., detained at the age of 17
Pictureta
kenbyanex-detaineeboy.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
20/98
19
Legal framework:
Detention
The detention issue can be regarded both
from the perspective of International Lawand the national legislative framework.This includes domestic law policies in East
Jerusalem, the military orders that governthe occupied Palestinian territories andlaws under the PNA. The following chapterwill examine all of these aforementioned
legislative sectors.
International Law
There are several legal instruments on theinternational level that apply to childrenin detention (see list). However, the legalframework for child detainees is primarilycovered by the CRC. The convention
strongly condemns the arrest and detentionof minors. In addition, the Best-interestprinciple e.g. decisions that are beingtaken that could have an effect on childrenslives has to have the childs welfare as aparamount consideration the CRC statesin article 37b:12
12UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article37b. URL: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm (last
access: September 4, 2011
The Convention on the Rights of theChild was made available to signatories in
1989. Up to this date, the CRC is the mostwidely acknowledged UN treaty, with only
International Law applicable to thesituation of detained Palestinian
children:UDHR, 1948: Universal Declaration ofHuman Rights
GCIV, 1949: (Fourth) Geneva Conventionrelative to the Protection of Civilian Personsin Time of War
1955: Standard Minimum Rules for theTreatment of Prisoners
ICCPR, 1966: International Covenant onCivil and Political Rights
CAT, 1984: Convention against Tortureand Other Cruel, Inhuman or DegradingTreatment or Punishment
Beijing Rules, 1985:Minimum Rules for theAdministration of Juvenile Justice
1988:Body of Principles for the Protectionof All Persons under Any form of Detentionor Imprisonment
CRC, 1989:Convention on the Rights ofthe Child
Riyadh Guidelines, 1990: Guidelines forthe Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency
1990: Basic Principles for the Treatment ofPrisoners
1990:Rules for the Protection of JuvenilesDeprived of their Liberty
No child shall be deprived of
his or her liberty unlawfully or
arbitrarily. The arrest, detention
or imprisonment of a childshall be in conformity with the
law and shall be used only as a
measure of last resort and for
the shortest appropriate period
of time. 12
Best-interest of the child
CRC, Article 3
1. In all actions concerningchildren, whether undertaken
by public or private socialwelfare institutions, courts of
law, administrative authoritiesor legislative bodies, the best
interests of the child shall be aprimary consideration.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
21/98
20
the USA and Somalia failing to ratify the
convention.
Although Israel ratied the CRC in 1991, the
realization of its content is fundamentally
inconsistent with the reality regarding
Israels treatment of detained Palestinian
children. Whereas the CRC considers all
humans under the age of 18 to be children,
the Israeli Military Law that was
applied to Palestinian children until
October 2011, dened a child as a
person below 12 years of age, youth
from 12 to 14 years, from 14 to 16
young adults and the age for theconsideration of an adult was over
16.13
As mentioned before, this law has
recently been amended to dene an
adult as a person over 18 years of
age.
However, the detention of children in theWest Bank remains a systemized procedure.
An average of 200-300 children is held in
detention on a monthly basis.
Another legal instrument applicable to
the context of child detention is the UN
Convention Against Torture (CAT), as
torture or ill-treatment during detention
are reported in a huge number of cases.14
Torture is dened in the rst article of theConvention Against Torture (CAT) as:
sanctions.15
13 Defence for Children International - Palestine Section
(2007). Palestinian Child Prisoners.14 Defence for Children International - Palestine Section2007. Palestinian Child Prisoners
15 UN Convention Against Torture, Article 1. URL:http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm (last access:September 4, 2011)
Thus, four conditions constitute
torture:
1. Severe pain or suffering (whetherphysical or mental)
2. Intentionality of iniction3. Intent to achieve one of the
purposes mentioned, includingobtaining information and/or aconfession
experiences such as torture and ill-
treatment will have a bigger effect ontheir personality, and emotional andpsychological well-being. Amongst manyothers, one major issue facing Palestinianchildren in detention is the separationfrom their families. According to the CRC,every child deprived of his or her libertyshall have the right to maintain
contact with his or her family through
(...) any act by which severe painor suffering, whether physical ormental, is intentionally inictedon a person for such purposesas obtaining from him or a thirdperson information or a confession,punishing him for an act he or athird person has committed or issuspected of having committed,or intimidating or coercing himor a third person, or for anyreason based on discriminationof any kind, when such pain orsuffering is inicted by or at theinstigation of or with the consent
or acquiescence of a public ofcialor other person acting in an ofcialcapacity. It does not include painor suffering arising only from,inherent in or incidental to lawfulsanctions.15
Thus, four conditions constitute
torture:
1. Severe pain or suffering (whetherphysical or mental)
2. Intentionality of iniction
3. Intent to achieve one of the
purposes mentioned, including
obtaining information and/or a
confession
4. Done by, or with the acquiescence
of, a public ofcial
Children subjected to torture suffer from
various post-traumatic effects: isolation,
insomnia, anxiety, emotional and mental
scars, stress disorder, anti-social behaviour,
violence against younger siblings and
children the list is extensive. The impact
torture has on children is far more severe
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
22/98
21
correspondence and visits16. However, most Palestinian children are held in detentioncentres inside of Israel, where their parents are unable to visit them because of difcultiesin getting a permit to travel to Israel, or nancial implications that travel there would entail.This is a breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which denes humanitarian protectionof civilians in a war zone and which strongly prohibits the forcible transfer and deportation
of protected persons17outside the occupied territories.18 As a result, families have to applyfor permission, which is denied in most cases.
The following table19 gives an overview of all principles and rights that are applicableto the situation of Palestinian child detainees and the violations thereof: Voices of ex-detainees20
16 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 37c. URL: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm (last access:September 4, 2011)17 The Geneva Convention denes protected persons in Article 4 as follows: Persons protected by the Convention are those
who, at a given moment and in any manner whatsoever, nd themselves, in case of a conict or occupation, in the hands of a Party
to the conict or Occupying Power of which they are not nationals . URL: http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/380?OpenDocument(last access: September 4, 2011)18 Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 49. URL: http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/380?OpenDocument (last access: September4, 2011)19 Table changed and amended, original to be found in: Cook, C., Hanieh, A., Kay, A (2004). Stolen Youth. The Politics
of Israels detention of Palestinian children. London: Pluto Press. 36f.20 All statements were given by ex-detainee children, who were interviewed for this report. The testimonies are attached intheir fulllengths in the appendix of this report
Right/PrincipleHuman Rights Instrument
and Article
General Principles
Best-interest principle CRC, Art. 3.1
Last-resort principle CRC, Art. 37b
Principle of non-discrimination ICCPR, Art. 2.1 / CRC, Art. 2 /Standard Minimum Rules, 6.1
Right to be presumed innocent until
proven guilty
UDHR, Art. 11 / CRC, Art. 40.2 b.i/ Standard Minimum Rules, 84.2
The aim of punitive measures are
rehabilitation and reformation
ICCPR, Art. 10.3 / CRC, Art. 40.1
Children shall be accorded treatment
appropriate to their age and legal status
ICCPR, Art. 10.3 / CRC, Art. 37c
Child-specic laws, procedures,
authorities and institutions should be
established
CRC, Art. 40.3
than it is on adults, as they are still in thedevelopmental stages of their personality.As children have a much lower pain thresholdthan adults, traumatic experiences such astorture and ill-treatment will have a bigger
effect on their personality, and emotionaland psychological well-being. Amongstmany others, one major issue facing
Palestinian children in detention is the
separation from their families. According
to the CRC, every child deprived of hisor her liberty shall have the right tomaintain contact with his or her family
through correspondence and visits16.
However, most Palestinian children are heldin detention centres inside of Israel, wheretheir parents are unable to visit thembecause of difculties in getting a permit totravel to Israel, or nancial implications that
travel there would entail. This is a breachof the Fourth Geneva Convention, whichdenes humanitarian protection of civiliansin a war zone and which strongly prohibitsthe forcible transfer and deportation ofprotected persons17outside the occupiedterritories.18 As a result, families have toapply for permission, which is denied inmost cases.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
23/98
22
Special measures shall be available toensure that children are dealt with in amanner appropriate to their well-being andproportionate both to their circumstances andthe offence (examples of special measuresinclude: care, guidance, and supervision orders,
counselling, probation, foster care, educationand vocational training programmes and otheralternatives to institutional care)
CRC, Art. 40.4
Right to maintain communication with widercommunity, including family and legal counsel
CRC, Art. 37c / Beijing Rules, 26.5/ UN Rules for the Protection of
Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty59-62
Rights Regarding Treatment
Right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman,and degrading treatment or punishment
UDHR, Art. 5 / ICCPR, Art. 7 /CRC, Art. 37a / CAT
Right to be treated with humanity and respectfor the inherent dignity of the human person
ICCPR, Art. 10.1 / CRC, Art. 37c
Carrying and use of weapons by personnelshould be prohibited in any facility where
juveniles are detained
UN Rules for the Protection ofJuveniles Deprived of their Liberty,65
Disciplinary measures constituting cruel,inhuman or degrading treatment shallbe strictly prohibited, including corporalpunishment, placement in a dark cell, closed orsolitary connement or any other punishmentthat may compromise the physical or mentalhealth of the juvenile concerned.
UN Rules for the Protection ofJuveniles Deprived of their Liberty,67
Rights Regarding Arrest Procedures
Prohibition on arbitrary arrest or detention UDHR, Art. 9 / ICCPR, Art. 9.1 /
CRC, Art. 37bRight to be promptly brought to court to seeif detention is lawful
ICCPR, Art. 9.4 / CRC, Art. 37d
Right to be informed of reasons for arrest ICCPR, Art. 9.2
Right to know of any charges ICCPR, Art. 9.2 / CRC, Art. 40.2b.ii
He (the soldier) ceased
the moment, started
hitting me on our way
out, pushing me against
the wall
At court, I was invisible,
nobody would talk to me
or let alone tell me the
charges against me ()
The rst time I wassent to court, was after
one week ()
There was no information
about what they charged
me with ()
My parents wereallowed to come onlyonce: I didnt see them,because it was the daythey transferred me()
Voices of
ex-detainees20
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
24/98
23
Right to a defence and legal counsel UDHR, Art. 11 (1) / CRC, Art. 37d/ Beijing Rules, 15.1
Right not to be compelled to confess CRC, Art. 40.2b.iv
Rights Regarding Judicial Proceedings
Non-judicial proceedings should be usedwhenever possible when dealing with children
CRC, Art. 40.3b
Right to fair trial by impartial legal body UDHR, Art. 10 / CRC, Art. 40.1b.iii
Right to have case adjudicated as quickly aspossible
ICCPR, Art. 10.2b / CRC, Art.40.2b.iii
Right to appeal CRC, Art. 40.2b.v
Rights Regarding Pre-Trial and Post-Trial Detention
No detention with convicted persons whilepending trial
ICCPR, Art. 10.2a / StandardMinimum Rules, 8b
No detention with adults while pending trial ICCPR, Art. 10.2b / CRC, Art. 37c /Standard Minimum Rules, 8d
No detention with adults after sentencing ICCPR, Art. 10.3 / CRC, Art. 37c /Standard Minimum Rules, 8d
Detention with same category of prisoners Standard Minimum Rules, 8
Conditions of detention shall be hygienic Standard Minimum Rules, 12-13
Right to medical care UN Rules for the Protection of
Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty,49-55 / Beijing Rules 26.2
Detainees shall be provided food sufcientfor maintaining good health; food should be ofquality and well prepared
Standard Minimum Rules, 20.1
Right to practice religion while detained Standard Minimum Rules, 41-42
Right to pursue education while detained UN Rules for the Protection ofJuveniles Deprived of their Liberty,38 / Beijing Rules, 26.2, StandardMinimum Rules, 77
Right to pursue vocational training UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty,42
Right to recreation and daily exercise in openair, where possible
UN Rules for the Protection ofJuveniles Deprived of their Liberty,47
Every three months wewill add three months
more, until you confess,
the interrogator said. I
was scared to end up in
prison my whole life, so
I confessed on the last
day.
I have a problem with myrespiratory system whichleads to major breathingproblems (). I got sickin prison () but myrequest to see a doctornever went through.
We had no educationwhatsoever in prison. We
didnt even have books. All
that we could do was sleep
and eat, think, think and
think some more ()
That was the last time I
saw the sun. I stayed for 20
days in Jalameh in a dark
cell without any sunlight
and was never allowed to
go outside.
() the food smelledbad, nobody ate anything,it was not only bad butalso just a tiny portion.
I stayed () in a tinycell with six other olderinmates.
() there was no lawyer,
no judge, no nothing.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
25/98
24
This chapter explains the national legislativeframework and the differences betweenlaws applied to children in East Jerusalemand those living under occupation in theWest Bank.
Israel
Following the year 1967 and with it thestart of the Israeli occupation, Israel seized
control over the West Bank and the GazaStrip, thereby imposing a huge numberof military orders. Only East Jerusalemsubmits to the Israeli Domestic Law.Therefore different rules apply to childrenin the West Bank and in East Jerusalem.
West Bank
The military courts in the West Bank are notintended to function as a comprehensivelegal system. They must be understoodas the judicial arm21 of the occupyingpower, which means that the emphasislies more on security than on justice.Its purpose lies in imposing the Israeliperception of security on the Palestinianpopulation in the occupied areas. This
also explains why they lack the necessarytools to target root causes, instead onlyissuing punishment sentences (other thanrehabilitation and general deterrence thiscould include probation service, public or
community services and other alternatives
to detention, imprisonment and nes).
21 Weill, S. International Review of the Red Cross. The judicial arm of the occupation: The Israeli military courts
in the occupied territory. Volume 89, Number 866. URL:http://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/les/other/irrc_866_weill.pdf (last access: September 18, 2011)
Children arrested by Israeli military
personnel are perceived as offenders against
the security of the Israeli State and are
subsequently prosecuted under the Israeli
military system in military courts; a systemwhich also prosecutes Palestinian adults.
Until October 2011, Israeli Military Order
1676 (former Military Order 132) dened a
Palestinian child as a person under the age
of 16, and those children over the age of
16 were sentenced and put in prisons with
adults.22 Following the pressure of various
human rights organizations, Israel changed
this order to dene all persons under the ageof 18 as children.23 Palestinian children are
subjected to the same arrest, interrogation,
trial and imprisonment procedures asadults. The Military Law as applied to
22 No legal frontiers. URL: http://nolegalfrontiers.org/en/
general-information/juvenile-military-courts (last access:August 17, 2011).23 Haaretz. (October, 2011). URL: http://www.haaretz.
com/print-edition/news/following-criticism-idf-raises-age-for-palestinians-to-be-tried-as-minors-to-18-1.388197 (lastaccess: October 13, 2011)
IDF soldiers detained H. Y. in the middle ofthe night. Up to this day rie marks on thedoor remind the family of the invasion ofdozens of masked soldiers into their house.
National legislative framework
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
26/98
25
A. D. was detained for 20 months at the age
of 15 years. Regarding her time after releaseshe says: I was very introverted and isolated;I never wanted to go out and meet people.
the occupied Palestinian territoriesdiffers from the Law applied in theState of Israel. For example, theperiod of time a detainee can be heldin detention before being brought
before a court is 8 days, comparedto 24 hours under Israeli domesticlaw and a maximum of 12 hours forminors under 14 years of age.24 Also,while a Palestinian detainee from theoPt can be held in detention pending thecompletion of his or her trial for up to twoyears, in Israel this period is limited to amaximum of 9 months.Until recently , the age of majority for Israelis
was different from the age of majority forPalestinians in the oPt. While the denitionof a child under Israeli domestic law isin harmony with the CRC, the age whenPalestinians in the West Bank are consideredto be adults before the law was 16, untilOctober 2011, when the Israelis succumbedto international pressure and petitions byhumanitarian organizations, to raise the agefor Palestinians to be treated as minors upto 18.25 In almost all cases, children detainedin the West Bank are transferred to prisonsand detention centres within Israel, whichcreates considerable obstacles for familiesto visit child detainees, as they need permitsto enter the State of Israel, which in mostcases are denied to them. It has to beemphasized that the transfer of detaineesoutside the occupied area breachesInternational Law, more particularly theFourth Geneva Convention.
Under military law, any soldieris authorized to arrest personssuspected of violating the order
without a warrant. The procedure ofthese arrests is usually severe: in almostall cases, dozens of armed, often disguised
24 No legal frontiers, URL: http://nolegalfrontiers.org/en/
general-information/the-military-courts (last access: August17, 2011).25 Haaretz. (October, 2011). URL: http://www.haaretz.
com/print-edition/news/following-criticism-idf-raises-age-for-palestinians-to-be-tried-as-minors-to-18-1.388197 (lastaccess: October 13, 2011)
soldiers burst noisily into the familyshouse; they conduct searches and drag thesuspect out of his or her bed. Blindfoldedand handcuffed, the suspects are then takenfor interrogations to detention centres.The style of these arrests does not
take personal circumstances or thelevel of offence into consideration;minors suspected of stone throwingare treated in the same way as adultssuspected of terrorism.
A huge difference can also be found wheninspecting the judicial treatment ofsettlers inhabitants of settlements thatare considered illegal under InternationalLaw. Although the security legislationempowers the judiciary in the West Bankto try any person who commits an offencewithin their area or jurisdiction, practicallythe military courts deal solely with casesrelating to Palestinian residents, while casesinvolving settlers (whether allegationsconcern criminal or security offences)are dealt with in the civilian courts withinIsrael.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
27/98
26
In East Jerusalem the treatment ofdetained minors routinely contravenes the
Youth Law, as amended in 2008. Since Israelconsiders East Jerusalem to be annexed,its inhabitants are therefore bound to theDomestic Law of Israel. The Youth Law wasamended in 2008 to bring Israeli statutorylaw on the adjudication of juveniles in linewith international law.In 2010 alone, 1,200 Palestinian minorswere investigated on suspicion of throwingstones, according to a report by the
Association on Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI)on the violations of the Youth Law in East
Jerusalem.26 The Youth Law grants specialprotection to minors; for example, a minorsuspected of committing a criminal offenceis entitled to consult with a parent oranother relative prior to being interrogated,and to have the parent or relativepresent during interrogation. Article 9f(a)
emphasizes that A minor suspected ofcommitting a criminal offence will besummoned for questioning and will
be interrogated with the knowledge
of his parent (). Generally, summonsgiven out to minors are a rarity in East
Jerusalem. Almost all cases researched byACRI, as well as those investigated by Savethe Children, indicate that the childrenwere either taken from their homes in the
middle of the night or arrested on theirway to school.
The Law also prohibits interrogatinga minor at night by stating that a minorshould not be arrested if the objective can
26Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) (March
2011). Violations of the Youth Law (Adjudication,
Punishment and Methods of Treatment) 1971
by the Israeli Police in East Jerusalem. URL: http:// www.acri.org.il/en/?p=2428 (last access: August 21,
2011)
be achieved in a less harmful way. However,this part does not address the detention
but only the interrogation of a child. Thelaw prohibits the interrogation of a minorat night, except in instances when thequestioning is conducted at the time theminor is detained, or with the consent ofthe minor and his or her parent, or whenit concerns a serious offence. Accordingto ACRIs report, some of the parentswere willing to bring the minors in forinterrogation the next morning, making a
night arrest unnecessary. Both the ACRIreport, and a report done by the Israelihuman rights organization BTselem inDecember of 2010, show that when itconcerns children under the age of 14, inmost cases parents were not allowedto be present during their childsinterrogation. Despite the fact that thelaw doesnt allow parents to interferewith the investigation, interrogators
nonetheless stretched the provision of saidlaw. According to BTselem27, parents werecompelled to sign an agreement prohibitingthem to speak with their children, or wereseated behind their children to prevent eyecontact between the two. In one case, afather was removed after he asked,at the beginning of the interrogation,
why his sons face bore signs ofviolence.28
The age of criminal responsibility pursuantto the Police Ordinance Police Conductregarding Minors, Article 3b(1), is 12years. It states that A minor withoutcriminal responsibility who is suspected ofcommitting an offence should be treated
27 BTselem - The Israeli Information Center for Human
Rights in the Occupied Territories Caution: Children Ahead(December 2010). The Illegal Behavior of the Police towardMinors in Silwan suspected of Stone Throwing. URL:
http://www.btselem.org/publications/summaries/201012_caution_children_ahead (last access: August 21, 2011)28 Ibid.
East Jerusalem
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
28/98
27
as a witness. He should not be arrested,nor should a criminal le be opened against
him (). However, the collection oftestimonies given to different human rightsorganizations operating in East Jerusalemshow that children younger than 12 yearsold have been arrested, interrogated andin some cases even subjected to violentbehaviour by the police.29 Inconsistentwith Article 10b of the Youth Law, almostall cases documented involved minorsbeing handcuffed. Interviews with childrenundertaken by Save the Children30 conrm
this. In contradiction to its reality, the Lawstates that A decision will not be made tohandcuff or shackle an arrested minor if itis possible to achieve the same goal in a lessharmful way (). Many of these childrenreported having born marks from handcuffsthat were too tight even days later.31 Also,children were not allowed to consult withtheir parents before the interrogation, asthe law species. The table below shows
the specic sections of the Youth Law,which are not respected by the police withregard to minors from East Jerusalem.
29 E.g. Haaretz (May 2011). URL: http://www.haaretz.com/
news/national/police-detain-7-year-old-palestinian-boy-and-accost-relatives-family-members-say-1.364828 (last access:August 21, 2011);Wadi Hilweh Information Center - Silwan (March 2011).
URL: http://silwanic.net/?p=13100 (last access: August 21,2011);Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) (March 2011).
Violations of the Youth Law (Adjudication, Punishmentand Methods of Treatment) 1971 by the Israeli Police inEast Jerusalem. URL: http://www.acri.org.il/en/?p=2428 (last
access: August 21, 2011);30 Testimonies to be found in appendix of this report.31 Ibid.
Picturetakenbyan
ex-detaineeboy.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
29/98
28
Table below: Police Violations of Rights of Minors in East Jerusalem as (mainly)
enshrined in the Israeli Youth Law (The table is based on the translation of the
relevant articles and the ndings of the ACRI report, 2011)
Summons for
Questioning by thePolice
Youth Law, Article 9f(a)
A minor suspected of committing a criminal offence will besummoned for questioning and will be interrogated with theknowledge of his parent ()
Juvenile Arrest as a
Last Resort
Youth Law, Article 10(a)
No decision shall be made to arrest a minor if it is possible toachieve the goal of arrest through means that are less damagingto his liberty; and any such arrest will be for the shortest possibleperiod of time required to achieve that goal; in any decision toarrest a minor, the suspects age and the impact of the arrest on hisphysical and mental well-being and development must be taken into
account.
Parental Presence
in Interrogation of
Minors
Youth Law, Article 9h(a)
A suspected minor is entitled to have a his/her parents orother close relative present at the interrogation, and is similarlyentitled to consult with them, preferably before the start of theinterrogation ()
Arrest and
Interrogation at
Night
Youth Law, Section 9j
A minor suspected of a crime should not be interrogated at thepolice station at night ()
Handcufng of aMinor in a Public
Place
Youth Law, Article 10bA decision will not be made to handcuff or shackle an arrestedminor if it is possible to achieve the same goal in a less harmfulway; any such handcufng of a minor will last for the shortest timerequired to achieve the above goal; in deciding to handcuff a minor,the ofcer must take into account the suspects age and the effectthat handcufng will have on the minors physical and mental well-
being.
Delay and Arrest of
Minors Under the
Age of Criminal
Responsibility
Penalty Code, 1977, Article 34f
A person shall not be held criminally responsible for actscommitted before he was twelve years old.
Police Ordinance Police Conduct regarding Minors, Article 3b(1)A minor without criminal responsibility who is suspected ofcommitting an offence should be treated as a witness. He should
not be arrested, nor should a criminal le be opened against him.
Police Ordinance Police Conduct regarding Minors, Article 3b(2)It is permitted to detain a minor who is under the age of criminalresponsibility, for the purpose of examining his details or having himmeet with a child-welfare ofcer invited into the investigation.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
30/98
29
The Israeli occupation poses an obstacleto the governance abilities of the PNA. Thefragmentation of the Palestinian territoryinto Areas A, B and C, as well as the lackof territorial continuity between the WestBank and Gaza (and even within the WestBank itself), limits the PNAs jurisdiction.Nonetheless, efforts have been made to
ensure the integration of the UN CRC, as ameans of improving child protection under
Palestinian jurisdiction.32
That being said, the legislative frameworkthat regulates child protection at thedomestic level within the PA still lackseffective protection. In 2004, the PA passed
32This section is a shortened excerpt, rst published in:Save the Children. Child Rights Situation Analysis (CRSA).
Occupied Palestinian Territory - 2011. 91-95.
the Palestinian Child Law (PCL) to protect
the rights of children by consolidating andcoordinating efforts between the differentministerial entities of the PA. However, thescope of its protection for children shouldbe expanded. The PLC lacks efciencyregarding the appointment of responsible
duty-bearers, and does not stipulate precisepenalties for violations of the law.33
The number of children in conict with thelaw in the oPt is drastically increasing.MoSA, which is the main body responsiblefor overseeing child protection mechanismsin the oPt, reported 1,960 cases of children
33 This Week in Palestine. Issue 154. February 2011.
URL: http://www.thisweekinpalestine.com/details.php?id=3326&ed=191&edid=191 (last access: September5, 2011)
National legislative framework:
Palestinian National Authority32
Picturetakenby
anex-detaineeboy.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
31/98
30
accused of being in conict with the lawin 2009, three times the number of allegedcases in 2007. Data from Gaza was notavailable for the period 2007-2009. Themost common offence was theft and/
or destruction of property, and 3-5% ofchildren were charged with sexual/physicalassault. The number of accused girls isvery low. 90% of children arrestedand charged are male. While povertyis the main motivation for children to actin conict with the law, a normalization ofviolence, problematic family situations, andrepressive religious and cultural traditions
contribute to the phenomenon.
The Ministry of Social Affairs is the mainbody responsible for overseeing the oPtschild protection mechanism, but it doesnot have a sufcient number of protectioncentres or ofcers under its supervisionto fully accommodate the number ofchildren who require protection. Likewise,collaboration with other governmental and
non-governmental bodies (e.g. to strengtheninter-ministerial child protection policy)leaves much to be desired. The oPt alsolacks an adequate juvenile justice system,as the mechanisms that exist for dealingwith children in conict with the law areoutdated, and its protection methodsand resources do not meet internationalstandards.
Art. 40 of the CRC lists a number ofsafeguards that should be ensured whenchildren are deprived of their liberty. Sofar these havent been implemented yetby the Palestinian Authority. The two oldregulations, from the Egyptian and Jordanianadministrations, enforced respectivelyin the Gaza Strip and West Bank, aredriven by a philosophy that sees children
in conict with the law as criminals andtends to punish them instead of offering
necessary social support. This is a majorfactor contributing to the deplorablesituation of juvenile delinquents. The maindocument referring to the West Bank is theOrdinance of Reforming Juveniles No. 16,
Jordan, 1954; whilst the following laws playa central role in regulating issues in the GazaStrip: Juvenile Offenders Ordinance No. 2of 1937 as amended by Juvenile OffendersOrdinance No. 31, Egypt, 1938, Rules ofTrial of Juvenile Offenders, British Mandate,1937/1938/1941 and Regulations ofPrisons and Reformatory Schools, Chapter117, Article 12, British Mandate, 1932.34
The use of terminology in the law reinforcessuch beliefs. The law in Gaza labels childrenin conict with the law as criminals,and those in the west Bank as juveniledelinquents.35 As a result, these outdatedsystems of laws are insufcient in embodyingsome of the fundamental principles of theinternational standards on juvenile justiceand, therefore, are ill-equipped to meetthose guarantees provided by the CRC and
other international documents.
Worryingly, the PLC also does not properlyaddress the substantial loopholes in thecurrent systems in place, in both theWest Bank and Gaza Strip. In fact, only 3of the 75 articles of the Child Law are
dedicated to juvenile offenders.36 Theydescribe principles such as the prohibitionof cruel treatment, the necessity of
establishing special measures in dealingwith children and the duty to treat childrenin a manner appropriate to their age anddignity. However, these articles do notallocate legal accountability onto duty-bearers or identify detailed procedures to
34 For a complete analysis of the law currently in place seeDCI-Palestine, Juvenile Justice Annual Report, 2006.35
Particip and Soges (June 2010). A study of juvenilejustice in the occupied Palestinian Territory.36 See art. 67-69.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
32/98
31
follow. Thus, in order to be enforceable, theChild Law requires additional articulationby relevant ofcial institutions.37
Very little has changed following theenactment of the Palestinian Child Lawbecause of the aforementioned regulatoryinadequacies. The nalization of the on-going drafting process of a new Palestinian
juvenile justice bill in line with international
standards has a long way to go.To worsen the situation, the alreadydefective safeguards enshrined by the
Jordanian and Egyptian regulations are notproperly enforced by governmental actors.Due either to the inactivity of police ofcersor difculties in transferring children from
37 See Child Protection in the Occupied PalestinianTerritory Structures, Policies and Services, the Institute of
Community and Public Health Birzeit University and theNational Plan of Action Secretariat, unpublished report,April 2006. 45.
one area to another, as a result of thezoning system imposed over the West Bankby the Israeli government, means childrenare likely to be kept in police stations orprisons along with adults. Moreover, thelack of expertise in the MoJ leads to thesystematic non-application of the existingmeasures, such as in camera trial and in
the establishment of juvenile chambers,procedures in line with internationalstandards. The role played by the MoSAdoes not improve the situation. The severelack of nancial and human resources andthe decient cooperation among West Bankand Gaza branches prevent the ministryfrom legally and socially assisting juvenileoffenders. As a result, there is a perennialshortage of probation ofcers and juvenile
rehabilitation centres.Despite the national endorsement of the
Picturetakenbyanex-detain
eeboy.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
33/98
32
CRC by the PNA, current policies onjuvenile justice do not reect internationalstandards. In fact, the Palestiniancommunity is more likely to stigmatize thedishonourable behaviour of children and
systematically marginalize them, rather thansupporting them by means of recognizingand reducing the social inictions that leadto their behaviour.38
Due to the complexity of the issue, thethree main relevant ministries for juvenile
justice MoSA, MoI and MoJ shouldbe cooperating closely and followinginternal and inter-ministerial policies
addressing juvenile offenders.39
However,this is not the case. As a result, no juveniledepartments or juvenile courts have beenestablished among the police and judicialforces.40 Rules that deal with children in theabsence of specialized juvenile chambersare also missing. With regards to MoSA,there have been some recent positive stepsin the improvement of juvenile justice.The current leadership has been taking
reform and institutionalization issues veryseriously. In 2010, MoSA, in collaborationwith the ofce of the Representative ofthe EU and EUPOL COPPS, undertook
38 Interview with Daoud Darawi, DCI Palestine, lawyer.Ramallah, May 7, 2008. See also interview with Farid Alafrsh,
the Palestinian Independent Commission for CitizensRights, eld researcher. April 8, 2008.39 Granted, there is a legal provision that calls for the
establishment of a juvenile court. However, the only
difference with the adult court seems to be that the trialwould be carried out behind closed doors. There is nojuvenile judge appointed or other special measures applied.
Worryingly, even this minor guarantee does not apply whenthe crime has been committed by the child together withadults. A representative of the PICCR stated how the lack
of internal policy negatively effects protection of children,see interview with Farid Alafrsh, Palestinian IndependentCommission for Citizens Rights, eld researcher. April 8,2008. During the interview he stated that, for example,
police ofcers from Bethlehem (directly from the MoI) arenot in cooperation with those from Ramallah.40 Ibid. at p. 45. However, according to this source there
are individual policemen unofcially responsible for dealingwith juvenile justice issues according to broad imperativesrather than specic policies or procedures.
a comprehensive structure and needsassessment of PNA authorities dealing with
juvenile justice and provided a plan basedon the cited report.41
The lack of an adequate legal framework,
in terms of both laws and policies, is
exacerbated by the inefciency andfragmentation of the PNA in providingappropriate legal and social support tochildren. Firstly, those safeguards that arealready enshrined in the national laws,
41 Particip and Soges (June 2006). A study of juvenile justicein the occupied Palestinian Territory.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
34/98
33
insufcient as they may be, are not evenfully enforced by relevant stakeholders.In the absence of appropriateimplementation of the international
standards, the PNA is the body primarily
accountable for the violation of the basic
rights of Palestinian children once theyenter the juvenile justice system. As amatter of fact, the drafting process of anew and unied Juvenile Justice law
was started in 1999.42 Governmental
42Ministry of Planning and UNICEF, Child Protection inthe Occupied Palestinian Territories: a National Position
Paper, Logo Production, Jerusalem, Occupied Palestinian
branches in both the West Bank and GazaStrip , UNICEF and the main legal PalestinianNGOs have been involved in developinga bill that enshrines the vast majority ofsafeguards provided internationally.
Save the Childrens
work regarding Juvenile
Justice under Palestinian
Jurisdiction
As mentioned before, the rights of childrenin conict with the law are currentlybeing violated on a regular basis. To llthe legal gap, the main governmental andnon-governmental players should pushthe government to streamline the existinglegal framework according to internationalstandards, in order to offer juvenileoffenders a minimum level of protection.This can be achieved through restructuring,institutionalizing and supporting the
development and protection of childrensrights. Save the Children works to improvethe juvenile justice system in the oPt. Inthe following projects, Save the Childrenbrings together its implementing partnerorganizations to foster local networking onthe one hand, and to prevent child rightsviolations of vulnerable groups, and facilitatetheir reintegration into their communitieson the other.
Child Protection through
Art and Literature
With the project Child Protection through
Art and Literature, Save the Children aims
at working with children who are in conict
with the law in Bethlehem and Ramallah.
Territories, June 2005 p. 59.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
35/98
34
The targeted children have committed
criminal offences and are kept in juvenile
delinquent rehabilitation centres. The
project provides a space for those children
to discover their capacities and to enhance
their self-esteem and expression abilities.
In this way they can then articulate their
needs and weaknesses and thus overcome
them through expressive art activities
as a tool of self-protection. The activities
conducted with children include different
expressive art activities including singing,
writing poetry, theatre, music activities
and book discussions in the libraries. The
project also aims to build the capacityof social workers, youth teams and to
conduct summer camps to help cultural
and educational development, as well as to
enhance networking among related sectors.
The overall objectives are to strengthen civil
society and help promote the prioritisation
and adjudication of childrens rights within
the Palestinian community.
Child Justice
As stated previously, the Palestinian Juvenile Justice system has severe shortcomingsthat result in poor enforcement ofinternational standards of child protectionin the oPt. In light of this situation, Savethe Children works to ll gaps and
create more comprehensive mechanismsto ensure the protection of childrensrights, with a special focus on children inconict with the law. The aim of the Child
Justice project of Save the Children is toimprove the protective environment forchildren within the PA and to improve theaccountability of duty-bearers (such asPLC, judges, prosecutors, law enforcement
ofcials and relevant ministries) under bothPA and Israeli jurisdiction. Hence, the two
partner organizations monitor, documentand report on violations of the rights ofchildren in conict with the law and childvictims of violence. They also defend therights of children in conict with the law by
legally representing children and giving legaladvice to their parents through lawyers,in so doing advocate for the fullment ofPalestinian childrens rights. The activitiesunder this project concentrate on improvingthe protection of children in conict withthe law through three main pillars: capacitybuilding of relevant actors, evidence-basedlobbying and advocacy aimed at better
protection policies and practices, as well aslegal representation and consultation.
Psychosocial
Rehabilitation of
Children in Conict with
the Law
The Psychosocial Rehabilitation of Childrenin Conict with the Law is a project thattargets children who are in conict withthe law. An intervention on a psychosociallevel takes place with the objective ofsupporting these children to reintegrateback into their societies. The children in
need of psychosocial intervention will get
In the two prisons where limited
education is provided, a single Arab-
Israeli teacher enters the prison to
teach. The children are not separated
based on age or ability and are only
given exercise books and pencils for
the duration the class and then made to
return this equipment at the end of thelesson. The education provided in prison
is not compulsory Defence for Children
International, Palestine Section
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
36/98
35
psychological support and counselling.Not only does it target the concernedchildren, but also their families, to improvetheir knowledge on effective ways todeal with their children, achieved through
psychological support and counselling. Ona broader level, Save the Children builds thepsychosocial capacities of social workersand psychologists working in the juvenilecentres, as well at the MoSA, includingprobation ofcers. In addition, Save theChildren lobbies and advocates for theimprovement of conditions and servicesto children in juvenile centres by bringing
this issue to national duty-bearers, mainlyministries, to raise awareness on the issue.
Role of Major duty-
bearers
In compliance with the legislativeframeworks and in addition to the mainduty-bearer, Israel, as the occupying power,
there are three other important duty-bearers regarding the child detentionissue: governmental Palestinian bodies, civilsociety actors and the family unit.Although actors fail in meeting their(international and national) obligations,occasionally one phenomenon can beobserved, in which detention, as such, ispartially perceived as a heroic means ofresisting the Israeli occupation. The severe
mental, emotional and sometimes physicalimplications of detention are thereforeunderestimated, leading detainees(especially children) to believe that anoutcry for help after detention is shamefuland a sign of either personal weakness or alack of solidarity with the Palestinian cause.Hence, it can be emotionally very confusingfor a child to seek help and support after
detention.
Israeli Authorities
Israel, as the occupying power in theWest Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza, hasresponsibilities towards the occupiedpeople, as codied in The Hague Conventionand the Fourth Geneva Convention.Other than maintaining the security of theterritories and ensuring public order andsafety43, Israel has an obligation to safeguardthe welfare of the local population. Asa signatory of the UN CRC, the Stateof Israel is urged to adopt, protect andimplement the principles, as stated in the
treatys bylaws. Whereas the UN CRC isconsistently applied to Israeli children,this is not the case for Palestinian childrenliving in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.However, starting in November 2009, aMilitary Youth Court in the West Bank wasestablished, but it lacked sufcient impact onthe ground for Palestinian minor detainees,according to a report by BTselem.44Even when it comes to providing
educational services, during and after
detention, the Israeli government fails toimplement international standards; DCI-PSreports that only 2 of the Israeli prisonsin which Palestinian children are held offereducation and even there the service isby no means sufcient to guarantee thefullment of childrens right to education.45
43Foundation for Middle East Peace. Israel Requiredby International Law to Protect Palestinians Under
Occupation. URL: http://www.fmep.org/reports/archive/
vol.-4/no.-3/israel-required-by-international-law-to-protect-palestinians-under-occupation (last access:September 19, 2011)44 BTselem - The Israeli Information Center for HumanRights in the Occupied Territories (July 2011). No MinorMatter. Violation of the Rights of Palestinian Minors Arrestedby Israel on Suspicion of Stone-Throwing. URL: http://www.
btselem.org/download/201107_no_minor_matter_eng.pdf(last access: September 19, 2011)45 Defence for Children International (2009). Education
in chains: Gaps in Education Provision to Children inDetention. An Overview of the Right to Education ofChildren in Detention. URL: http://www.defenceforchildren.
35
Backgro
undpicture:GraftibythefamousLondonartistBanksyshowingre
versedrolesinBethlehem.
-
8/2/2019 Impact of Child Detention in Occupied Palestine - Save the Children Report - March 2012 En
37/98
36
In this regard, it is important to notethat, according to MoEHE, no systematiccooperation has been built betweenthis ministry and Israeli authorities and,consequently, they are unable to overcome
the loss of months, and sometimes years, ofeducation of the many children detained inIsrael.46 The current Minister of Educationhas never been allowed by Israeli authoritiesto visit the prisons.47
Governmental Duty