imm quarterly report: winter 2018 - potomaceconomics.com€¦ · imm quarterly report: winter 2018...
TRANSCRIPT
IMM Quarterly Report:
Winter 2018
MISO Independent Market Monitor
David Patton, Ph.D.
Potomac Economics
March 27, 2018
-2-© 2018 Potomac Economics
• The MISO markets performed competitively this winter.
✓ Natural gas prices fell by 6 percent over last year, but energy prices increased by 8 percent over the same period due to January weather-related events.
✓ Market power mitigation was infrequent and offers were competitive.
• In January, extremely cold temperatures throughout the footprint affected gas prices, generation outages and performance, and energy prices.
✓ Significant fuel price volatility in late December and early January contributed to high congestion and price volatility.
• On January 17 and 18, MISO declared Maximum Generation Events and took a number of emergency actions in the South.
✓ Temperature-related forced outages contributed to tight conditions on multiple days.
✓ LMRs were scheduled and deployed on both days and MISO took a number of other emergency actions on January 17.
✓ Reliability was maintained, but prices did not efficiently reflect conditions.
• A new wind output record of 15.0 GW was set on January 17.
• Transmission congestion was significantly higher this winter than last year.
Highlights and Findings: Winter 2018
-3-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Quarterly Summary
Value
Prior
Qtr.
Prior
Year Value
Prior
Qtr.
Prior
Year
RT Energy Prices ($/MWh) $31.13 4% 8% FTR Funding (%) 101% 100% 99%
Fuel Prices ($/MMBtu) Wind Output (MW/hr) 7,217 14% 5%
Natural Gas - Chicago $3.08 7% -6% Guarantee Payments ($M)4
Natural Gas - Henry Hub $3.06 4% -6% Real-Time RSG $17.7 -25% 50%
Western Coal $0.70 4% 4% Day-Ahead RSG $11.1 12% -19%
Eastern Coal $1.51 1% -2% Day-Ahead Margin Assurance $13.7 16% 27%
Load (GW)2 Real-Time Offer Rev. Sufficiency $1.0 -43% -21%
Average Load 79.4 9% 5% Price Convergence5
Peak Load 106.1 -8% 4% Market-wide DA Premium 2.4% -3.0% 0.2%
% Scheduled DA (Peak Hour) 98.7% 98.4% 99.0% Virtual Trading
Transmission Congestion ($M) Cleared Quantity (MW/hr) 15,519 4% 30%
Real-Time Congestion Value $384.4 -15% 29% % Price Insensitive 35% 30% 30%
Day-Ahead Congestion Revenue $231.4 14% 56% % Screened for Review 1% 1% 1%
Balancing Congestion Revenue3 $.6 $12.8 $11.4 Profitability ($/MW) $1.32 $0.83 $0.55
Ancillary Service Prices ($/MWh) Dispatch of Peaking Units (MW/hr) 831 1023 444
Regulation $9.98 -1% 5% Output Gap- Low Thresh. (MW/hr) 82 95 92
Spinning Reserves $2.69 -7% 35% Other:
Supplemental Reserves $1.32 80% 80%
Key: Expected Notes:
Monitor/Discuss
Concern
4. Includes effects of market power mitigation.
Change1
Change1
1. Values not in italics are the value for the past period rather than the change.
2. Comparisons adjusted for any change in membership.
5. Values include allocation of RSG.
3. Net real-time congestion collection, unadjusted for M2M settlements.
-4-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Winter Peak: Late Dec ‘17 / Early Jan ‘18 (Slides 12, 13, 20, 21, 22)
• Gas prices rose 15 percent in January from the prior year, contributing to a 40 percent increase in energy prices.
• Extremely cold weather throughout the footprint from January 1 to 4 led to:
✓ MISO-wide Cold Weather Alerts and Conservative Operations ending Jan 6.
✓ Winter load peaked on January 2 at 104.7 GW, but was lower than the all-time winter peak load of 109.3 GW during the 2014 Polar Vortex.
✓ Fuel-related generation outages and more than 4 GW of generation that could only be used in an emergency contributed to tight operating conditions on several days.
– 14 intervals of operating reserve shortages occurred with average prices of $501/MWh.
✓ Multiple gas pipeline restrictions and high gas prices occurred.
– Dual-fuel capable units switched to burn oil that was cheaper than gas.
• Cold weather in late December also led to gas price volatility. The Ventura hub price was as high as $67.50 on three days and affected many units.
• We consulted with multiple participants on generation fuel costs for references and no inappropriate mitigation occurred.
Highlights for Winter 2018
-5-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Winter Peak: Jan 17th-18th in MISO South (Slides 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18)
• Unusually cold weather in the South on January 17 and 18 led to a record winter peak in the South of 32.1 GW on January 17 and emergency events.
• Conditions were extremely tight on January 17 from 6 AM to 1 PM:
✓ MISO’s load forecast in the early morning showed a significant capacity deficiency by 9 AM, prompting MISO to declare a Max Gen Alert starting 5 AM .
✓ The actual load was well below the forecast by the peak hours (7 to 9 AM) due to voluntary load curtailments and the initial response from LMRs called at 6 AM.
✓ However, forced outages rose from 5 GW at midnight to almost 7.5 GW by 8:30.
✓ MISO relaxed some of its transmission limits in the South, raising them by roughly 25 percent to increase access to generation.
✓ Because load exceeded supply, MISO exceeded the RDT limit for roughly an hour from 6:45 AM to 7:45 AM, by almost 1000 MW at 7:25 AM.
✓ MISO scheduled emergency transactions beginning at 7:30 AM that exceeded 1000 MW by 9 AM, allowing it to reduce the RDT flows to below the limit.
• MISO declared an emergency for the evening peak and for the morning of the 18th, but conditions were not as tight because some units returned from outage.
• Given the supply and demand conditions, all of MISO’s actions were necessary to keep the lights on in the South.
Highlights for Winter 2018
-6-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Winter Peak: Jan 17th-18th in MISO South (Slides 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18)
• Day-ahead congestion was much higher than real-time congestion costs.
✓ Emergency actions taken on both days resulted in lower real-time congestion.
✓ Louisiana Hub day-ahead premium exceeded $1,100 for one hour on Jan 18.
• Findings regarding LMRs:
✓ The LMRs were not obligated to be available (only required in the summer).
✓ Long notification times limit LMRs’ value – schedules were low on the 17th
in the morning peak. MISO declared the event early on Jan 18 to secure them.
✓ It is difficult to tell from observing the load the extent of the LMR response.
✓ This event may underscore the value of reconsidering how MISO quantifies the capacity credit for LMRs in the PRA.
• Findings regarding prices during the event on the 17th:
✓ Prices were high when the RDT was violated due to the RDT demand curve.
✓ Emergency procedures raised prices slightly, but much lower than optimal:
– ELMP did not properly account for RDT flows.
– The emergency price floor set by a unit offer can be too low or too high.
✓ Adding the regional reserve requirements and pricing any shortages that occur will lead to fully efficient prices.
Highlights for Winter 2018
-7-© 2018 Potomac Economics
High Congestion (Slides 10, 23, 24, 25, 26)
• Day-ahead and real-time quarterly congestion costs increased 56 and 29 percent, respectively, over last year.
✓ High gas volatility days early in the month, record-high wind production, and emergency conditions the South in January were contributing factors.
✓ More than one quarter of all day-ahead congestion occurred on January 17 and January 18.
• In January, MISO incurred $162 million in real-time congestion in the Midwest and $64.5 million in the South.
• More than 40 percent of real-time congestion was attributable to market-to-market constraints.
✓ One constraint impacted by a PJM pseudo-tied unit contributed to $36 million in congestion in the quarter, and PJM paid MISO $9.6 million.
✓ Wind units in PJM had the majority of relief on a constraint that contributed to $29 million in real-time congestion (which is difficult to manage).
Highlights for Winter 2018
-8-© 2018 Potomac Economics
• We made two new referrals and responded to FERC questions related to prior referrals and continued to meet with FERC on a weekly basis.
✓ A participant provided false information in a Reference Price Consultation.
✓ We also referred a matter related to PJM’s failure to perform CMP Study 1 and MISO is evaluating impacts for possible resettlement.
✓ We responded to several data requests related to prior referrals.
✓ We made several notifications of other potential Tariff violations.
• We participated in the following FERC dockets.
✓ We filed a protest related to MISO’s refiling of its capacity market in an attempt to remedy the design flaw that causes inefficiently low prices.
– FERC affirmed the design flaw, but the Order ignores the evidence we and others filed.
✓ We assisted MISO in the Order 831 Compliance filing (increasing the Offer Cap), and a modification to the Resource Adequacy Construct to include external resource zones in the PRA.
✓ We submitted comments in the Fast-Start Pricing dockets in NY and PJM.
Submittals to External Entities and Other Issues
-9-© 2018 Potomac Economics
• We participated in a number of stakeholder discussions and working groups.
✓ At the MSC and at the ERSC, we discussed concerns with the current RDT commitment tool and the need for improvements to reduce inefficient commitments.
✓ We continued to work with MISO and stakeholders on proposed improvements to the Uninstructed Deviation Thresholds (SOM 2012-2) and improved incentives for PVWMP (SOM 2016-5).
✓ In February, we presented at the RASC meeting to prepare stakeholders for the upcoming PRA.
✓ We participated in the February PJM-MISO JCM Meeting.
Submittals to External Entities and Other Issues
-10-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Day-Ahead Average Monthly Hub Prices
Winter 2016 – 2018
$0.0
$1.0
$2.0
$3.0
$4.0
$5.0
$6.0
$7.0
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
Dec Jan Feb Dec Jan Feb Dec Jan Feb
Winter 2016 Winter 2017 Winter 2018
Na
tura
l G
as
Pri
ce ($
/MM
Btu
)
$/M
Wh
Mean Gas Price Texas Hub
Arkansas Hub Louisiana Hub
Minnesota Hub Indiana Hub
Michigan Hub
-11-© 2018 Potomac Economics
All-In Price
Winter 2016 – 2018
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
16 17 18 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo. Avg. 2016 2017 2018
Na
tura
l G
as
Pri
ce ($
/MM
Btu
)
All
-In
Pri
ce ($
/MW
h)
Capacity Ancillary Services
Uplift Energy (Shortage)
Energy (Non-shortage) Natural Gas Price
-12-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Average Temperatures on January Cold Days
Hist.
Avg.* 1 2 3 4 5 16 17 18 19
Midwest
Minneapolis 14.2 -7.2 4.1 3.1 -1.4 -4.0 1.7 14.4 30.7 35.3
Milwaukee 21.8 -1.1 4.6 12.6 5.9 5.1 20.5 15.9 26.0 35.2
Detroit 25.9 8.4 6.7 10.8 8.7 1.5 13.1 12.7 20.7 29.7
Indianapolis 27.2 -3.7 -1.4 12.8 4.6 0.7 2.3 8.3 19.9 30.1
South
Little Rock 38.9 15.8 16.7 24.0 24.9 29.4 17.0 14.7 24.0 34.3
New Orleans 53.7 31.3 31.5 38.2 38.2 39.7 37.3 27.7 33.4 43.6
Cold Weather Alert (MISO)
Conservative Ops in MISO (Jan 2-5) and South (Jan 16,19)
Max Gen Event in South
* Historical Avg. is average of those days' average temperature from 2008-2017.
January
-13-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Cold Weather Alerts and Conservative Ops
January 1 - 4
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000$0
$120
$240
$360
Jan. 1 2 3 4
Lo
ad
(M
W)
Pri
ce ($
/MW
h)
Conservative OPS Cold Weather Alert Actual Load
January 1 January 2 January 3 January 4
DA SMP
RT SMP
DA F'cast Load
DA Sched. Load
-14-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Conservative Ops and Max Generation Event in
MISO South January 17 & 18
15,000
19,000
23,000
27,000
31,000
35,000$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1000
August 10 17 18 10
Lo
ad
(M
W)
Pri
ce ($
/MW
h)
MaxGen Event (South) Conservative Ops (South)
January 16 January 17 January 18 January 19
DA Load Weighted Price
RT Load Weighted Price
DA F'cast Load
DA Sched. Load
Actual Load
-15-© 2018 Potomac Economics
MISO South Generation and Load
January 17
0
500
1,000
22,000
24,000
26,000
28,000
30,000
32,000
34,000
36,000
38,000
40,000
42,000
44,000
46,000
48,000
50,000
52,000
3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
MW
MW
Jan. 17
Total Supply (incl. Imports & RDT)
Total Generation + RDT
Available Supply
Load
Scheduled LMR
Cancelled Scheduled LMR
Planned Outages
Forced Outages
Derates
Supply w/out
Emer. Purchases
7300 MW4100 MW
7000 MW
9200 MW
Generation
lost to
Outages
and Derates
-16-© 2018 Potomac Economics
MISO South Generation and Load
January 17 Maximum Generation Event
0
200
400
22,000
24,000
26,000
28,000
30,000
32,000
34,000
36,000
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
MW
MW
January 17
Available
Supply
LoadSupply w/out
Emer. Purchases
Scheduled LMR
MTLF
-17-© 2018 Potomac Economics
MISO South Generation and Load
January 18, 2018
0
500
1,000
18,000
20,000
22,000
24,000
26,000
28,000
30,000
32,000
34,000
36,000
38,000
40,000
42,000
44,000
46,000
48,000
50,000
52,000
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
MW
MW
Jan. 18
Load
Total Supply (incl. Imports & RDT)
Available Supply
Scheduled LMR
Cancelled Scheduled LMR
Planned Outages
Forced Outages
Derates
Total Generation + RDT
-18-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Pricing on January 17 During
Maximum Generation Event
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00
Emergency PurchasesExceeded
RDT
Efficient LMP with Emergency and
Shortage Pricing (30 min reserves)
Correct Emergency
Pricing in ELMP
Actual LMP Ex Ante LMP
-19-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Monthly Average Ancillary Service Prices
Winter 2017 – 2018
-$2
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018
Regulation Spinning Reserve Supplemental Reserve
$/M
Wh
Regulation Price (exclude shortages)
MCP Impact from Reg Shortages
Spinning Reserve Price (exclude shortages)
MCP Impact from Spin Shortages
Supp Reserve Price (exclude shortages)
MCP Impact from OR Shortages
Day-Ahead Premium
Winter Average of Five Years
-20-© 2018 Potomac Economics
MISO Fuel Prices
2016 – 2018
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
$3.5
$4.0
$4.5
$5.0
$5.5
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
16 17 18
$/M
MB
tu
2016 2017 2018
2016 2017 2018
IB Coal $1.36 $1.54 $1.51
PRB Coal $0.55 $0.67 $0.70
Winter Average
9.01
2016 2017 2018
Chicago NG $2.10 $3.26 $3.08
Henry NG $2.04 $3.25 $3.06
Winter Average
-21-© 2018 Potomac Economics
MISO Fuel Prices
Winter 2018
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
$14.0
$16.0
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 1 5 9 13 17 21 25
December 2017 January 2018 February 2018
$/M
MB
tu Oil
IB Coal
PRB Coal
Ventura Gas
Henry Hub Gas
Chicago Gate Gas
$68
-22-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Load and Weather Patterns
Fall 2016 – 2018
Note: Midwest degree day calculations include four representative cities in the Midwest: Indianapolis, Detroit, Milwaukee and
Minneapolis. The South region includes Little Rock and New Orleans.
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
0
300
600
900
1,200
1,500
1,800
16 17 18 15 16 17 16 17 18 16 17 18
Monthly Avg. Dec Jan Feb
Lo
ad
(M
W)
Ad
just
ed
Deg
ree D
ays
CDDs
HDDs
Average Load
Historical Avg.
Peak Load
-23-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Day-Ahead Congestion, Balancing Congestion
and FTR Underfunding, 2016 – 2018
-$15M
$0M
$15M
$0 M
$25 M
$50 M
$75 M
$100 M
$125 M
$150 M
$175 M
$200 M
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
2016 2017 2018
2017 2018
Balancing Congestion Revenue ($11.4 M) $0.6 M
DA Congestion Revenues $148.5 M $231.4 M
FTR Surplus (Shortfall) ($3.0 M) $6.6 M
FTR Funding (%) 99.1% 101.3%
Winter Totals
-24-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Value of Real-Time Congestion
Winter 2017 – 2018
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo. Avg. 16 2017 2018
Co
ng
est
ion
Va
lue ($
Mil
lio
ns)
Totals Win. 17 Fall 17 Win. 18
Midwest 201.4 M 370.3 M 292.8 M
Transfer Constraints 3.4 M 7.0 M 10.4 M
South 92.1 M 76.0 M 81.3 M
Total RT Value 296.9 M 453.3 M 384.4 M
DA Congestion Revenue 148.5 M 203.4 M 231.4 M
-25-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Market-to-Market Testing and Activation Delay
Congestion Costs: 2017 - 2018
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160C
onges
tio
n V
alue
($ M
illio
n)
Winter
2017
Spring
2017
Summer
2017
Fall
2017
Winter
2018
Never classified as M2M (PJM) $37.1 $29.6 $7.1 $73.3 $20.3
Never classified as M2M (SPP) $11.1 $57.8 $22.5 $30.3 $6.5
M2M Testing Delay (PJM) $8.8 $15.2 $15.8 $19.9 $4.8
M2M Testing Delay (SPP) $1.9 $2.4 $1.3 $5.1 $0.1
Congestion ($ Million)
Categories (NMRTO)
-26-© 2018 Potomac Economics
MISO Congestion Value and JOA Settlement
Constraints Impacted by Pseudo-Ties
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1
2015 2016 2017 2018
Mill
ions
JOA Payment - Uplift
JOA Payment - Transfer
Real-Time Congestion
Period with New PJM Pseudo-Ties
Before Pseudo Ties $22.4 M
After Pseudo Ties $38.3 M
Percentage Increase 71%
Average Congestion Per Quarter
-27-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Real-Time Hourly Inter-Regional Flows
2017 - 2018
-4,000
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
RD
T F
low
So
uth
to
No
rth
(M
W)
-3000 MW RDT Limit
2500 MW RDT Limit
M A M J J A S O N November December January February
Hourly Average
Daily Average
Monthly Average
Monthly Avg.
-28-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Wind Output in Real-Time and Day-Ahead
Monthly and Daily Average
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F 1-7 8-14 15-21 22-31 1-7 8-14 15-21 22-31 1-7 8-14 15-2122-28
2017 2018 Dec. 2017 Jan. 2018 Feb. 2018
Monthly Average Daily Average
Qu
an
tity
(M
W)
Winter Avg. 2016 2017 2018
Net Virtual Supply 562 452 86
Day-Ahead Wind 5,094 5,951 6,042
Real-Time Wind 5,731 6,903 7,217
-29-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Day-Ahead and Real-Time Price Convergence
Winter 2017 – 2018
-$10
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
DARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDARTDART
17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo. Avg. 2016 2017 2018
$/M
Wh
Average Price Difference
Absolute Difference
RT RSG Rate DA RSG Rate
Average RT Price Average DA Price
Indiana Hub 1 -3 1 0 1 -4 0 -3 5 -3 1 -16 3 2 4 -6 -8Michigan Hub 1 0 2 1 1 -6 -1 -1 0 -3 1 -11 -1 0 2 -2 1Minnesota Hub 0 -1 -6 3 3 -1 -5 1 5 -7 2 -7 -10 3 0 3 -6WUMS Area -3 0 -6 -1 -2 3 -1 3 3 -8 3 -11 0 0 2 2 -3Arkansas Hub 1 -2 0 1 3 -3 0 2 5 -7 2 -2 5 -3 1 -7 -1Texas Hub 1 -1 2 -2 3 -2 3 4 -1 -1 3 1 8 -6 4 -5 -1Louisiana Hub 1 -9 1 1 -2* 2 -4 3 -1 -9 -6 -1 7 -5 5 3* 3* Excluding Feb. 7, 2017 and Jan. 17-18, 2018.
Average DA-RT Price Difference Including RSG (% of Real-Time Price)
-30-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Day-Ahead Peak Hour Load Scheduling
Winter 2017 – 2018
80%
84%
88%
92%
96%
100%
104%
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Monthly Avg. 2016 2017 2018
Sh
are
of A
ctu
al
Lo
ad
Net Virtual Supply Net Virtual Load
Higher DA NSI Lower DA NSI
Price-Based Load Fixed Load
Share of Actual Load (%)
All Hours
Peak HoursMidwest
Peak HoursSouth
98.7
99.1
98.7
98.9
99.2
98.7
99.1
98.5
99.3
100.2
99.6
99.9
98.9
98.8
98.6
99.2
98.7
98.6
98.7
98.4
98.0
97.8
98.0
98.3
97.5
97.0
97.8
99.5
97.3
98.0
98.9
97.6
98.6
98.8
98.1
97.8
100.4
103.9
101.8
103.1
103.1
106.4
102.9
100.3
102.3
103.2
102.2
102.9
97.4
103.0
101.4
102.1
101.2
102.3
-31-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Virtual Load and Supply
Winter 2017 – 2018
32,000
28,000
24,000
20,000
16,000
12,000
8,000
4,000
0
4,000
8,000
12,000
16,000
20,000
24,000
28,000
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F 16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo.
Avg.
16 2017 2018 Mo.
Avg.
16 2017 2018
Midwest South
Avera
ge H
ou
rly V
olu
me (
MW
)
← S
up
ply
D
em
an
d →
Uncleared
Cleared, Price Sensitive
Cleared, Price Insensitive
Cleared, Screened Transactions
-32-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Virtual Load and Supply by Participant Type
Winter 2017 – 2018
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F 16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo.
Avg.
16 2017 2018 Mo.
Avg.
16 2017 2018
Financial-Only Participants Generators / LSEs
Avera
ge H
ou
rly V
olu
me (
MW
)
← S
up
ply
D
em
an
d →
Uncleared
Cleared, Price Sensitive
Cleared, Price Insensitive
Cleared, Screened Transactions
-33-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Virtual Profitability
January 1 - 20
-$4,000,000
$0
$4,000,000
$8,000,000
$12,000,000
To
tal P
rofi
ts
Date
Net MEC
Net MCC
Net MLC
-34-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Virtual Profitability
Winter 2017 – 2018
-$2
$0
$2
$4
-$5 M
$0 M
$5 M
$10 M
$15 M
$20 M
$25 M
$30 M
$35 M
$40 M
$45 M
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo. Avg. 16 2017 2018
Pro
fits
per
MW
To
tal P
rofi
ts (
Mil
lio
ns)
Supply
Demand
Gross
Percent Screened
Demand 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.8 1.4 1.2 0.5 1.7 1.4 0.7 0.6 2.3 0.6
Supply 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.2
Total 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.6 0.8 0.7 0.3 1.0 0.9 0.5 0.4 1.6 0.4
-35-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Day-Ahead and Real-Time Ramp Up Price
2016 – 2018
$0.00
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
$0.80
$1.00
$1.20
$1.40
$1.60
$1.80
$2.00
J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
2016 2017 2018
Ra
mp
Up
MC
P ($
per
MW
h)
Average RT Ramp Up MCP
Average DA Ramp Up MCP
-36-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Interface Pricing with PJM (Common Interface)
Winter 2018
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%S
ha
re o
f M
ark
et In
terv
als
Difference Relative to Ideal Price
-37-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Peaking Resource Dispatch
2016 – 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
400
800
1,200
1,600
2,000
2,400
2,800
3,200
3,600
4,000
4,400
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo. Avg. 16 2017 2018
In-M
eri
t M
W (
%)
Avera
ge H
ou
rly M
W
Real-Time Local Voltage Real-Time Congestion
Real-Time Capacity Committed Day-Ahead
Percent In-Merit
-38-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Day-Ahead RSG Payments
2016 – 2018
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo. Avg. 16 2017 2018
RS
G P
aym
en
ts ($
Mil
lio
ns)
Midwest South Total
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: VLR $1.18 $3.79 $4.97
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: Capacity $2.38 $2.01 $4.39
Total Nominal RSG $4.18 $6.88 $10.82
RSG Mitigation $0.24
Sum of 2018 Winter (Millions) Midwest South Total
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: VLR $1.18 $3.79 $4.97
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: Capacity $2.38 $2.01 $4.39
Total Nominal RSG $4.18 $6.88 $10.82
RSG Mitigation $0.24
Sum of 2018 Winter (Millions)
-39-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Real-Time RSG Payments
2016 – 2018
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo. Avg. 16 2017 2018
RS
G P
aym
en
ts ($
Mil
lio
ns)
Sum of 2018 Winter (Millions) Midwest South Total
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: VLR $0.01 $0.38 $0.39
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: Congestion $0.64 $0.73 $1.36
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: RDT $0.30 $1.16 $1.46
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: Capacity $8.32 $0.82 $9.15
Total Nominal RSG $13.59 $4.00 $17.59
RSG Mitigation $0.01 $0.07 $0.09
Sum of 2018 Winter (Millions) Midwest South Total
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: VLR $0.01 $0.38 $0.39
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: Congestion $0.64 $0.73 $1.36
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: RDT $0.30 $1.16 $1.46
Fuel-Adjusted RSG: Capacity $8.32 $0.82 $9.15
Total Nominal RSG $13.59 $4.00 $17.59
RSG Mitigation $0.01 $0.07 $0.09
-40-© 2018 Potomac Economics
RDT Commitment RSG Payments
2016 – 2018
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
$0.0M
$1.0M
$2.0M
$3.0M
$4.0M
$5.0M
$6.0M
$7.0M
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
2016 2017 2018
# D
ays
Un
its
Co
mm
itte
d f
or
RD
T
RS
G ($
M)
RSG to South Units
RSG to Central/ North Units
# Days Units Committed for RDT
-41-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Price Volatility Make Whole Payments
2016 – 2018
$0
$3
$6
$9
$12
$0
$3
$6
$9
$12
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo. Avg. 16 2017 2018
Vo
lati
lity
(Avera
ge I
nte
rva
l P
rice C
ha
ng
e)
Up
lift
Pa
ym
en
ts (
$ M
illi
on
s)
DAMAP (Midwest) RTORSGP (Midwest)
DAMAP (South) RTORSGP (South)
SMP Volatility LMP Volatility
-42-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Generation Outage Rates
2015–2016
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Winter 16 2017 2018
Sh
are
of
Ca
pa
cit
y
North South North South North South
Short-Term Unplanned Outages 4.1% 3.1% 4.7% 2.7% 4.1% 3.0%
Long-Term Unplanned Outages 3.9% 2.4% 5.1% 7.6% 5.5% 6.1%
Planned Outages 5.3% 6.7% 6.4% 7.8% 7.5% 10.6%
Total 13.2% 12.2% 16.2% 18.0% 17.1% 19.7%
2016 2017 2018Winter
-43-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Generation Outage Rates
South: 2015–2016
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Winter 16 2017 2018
Sh
are
of
Ca
pa
cit
y
Short-Term Unplanned Outages 3.1% 2.7% 3.0%
Long-Term Unplanned Outages 2.4% 7.6% 6.1%
Planned Outages 6.7% 7.8% 10.6%
Total 12.2% 18.0% 19.7%
Winter 2016 2017 2018
-44-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Monthly Output Gap
2016 – 2018
0.0%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo. Avg. 16 2017 2018
Sh
are
of A
ctu
al
Lo
ad
Ou
tpu
t G
ap
(M
W)
Low Threshold
High Threshold
Share of Actual Load
Low Threshold Results by Unit Status (MW)
High Threshold Results by Unit Status (MW)
Offline
Online
Offline
Online
13 6 0 24 13 6 5 11 14 4 2 1 12 0 0 0 0 0
13 20 23 29 23 19 27 24 55 20 16 10 24 15 26 19 33 14
14 6 0 25 13 6 5 11 14 4 2 2 16 0 0 0 0 0
60 63 88 113 72 46 100 79 130 69 63 44 114 68 86 72 113 63
-45-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Day-Ahead And Real-Time Energy Mitigation
2017 – 2018
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
161718 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F 161718 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo.
Total
2017 2018 Mo.
Total
2017 2018
BCA NCA
MW
Mit
iga
ted
Ho
urs
DA Hours Mitigated, NCA
RT Hours Mitigated, NCA
DA Hours Mitigated, BCA
RT Hours Mitigated, BCA
Combined MW Mitigated
-46-© 2018 Potomac Economics
Day-Ahead and Real-Time RSG Mitigation
2016 – 2018
0
30
60
90
120
$
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1000
16 17 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F
Mo. Avg. 16 2017 2018
Mit
iga
ted
Un
it-D
ays
RS
G M
itig
ati
on
Do
lla
rs (T
ho
usa
nd
s) DA RSG Mitigated
RT RSG Mitigated
Combined Unit-Days
-47-© 2018 Potomac Economics
• AMP Automated Mitigation Procedures
• BCA Broad Constrained Area
• CDD Cooling Degree Days
• CMC Constraint Management Charge
• DAMAP Day-Ahead Margin Assurance
Payment
• DDC Day-Ahead Deviation & Headroom
Charge
• DIR Dispatchable Intermittent Resource
• HDD Heating Degree Days
• ELMP Extended Locational Marginal Price
• JCM Joint and Common Market Initiative
• JOA Joint Operating Agreement
• LAC Look-Ahead Commitment
• LSE Load-Serving Entities
• M2M Market-to-Market
• MSC MISO Market Subcommittee
• NCA Narrow Constrained Area
• ORDC Operating Reserve Demand Curve
List of Acronyms
• PITT Pseudo-Tie Issues Task Team
• PRA Planning Resource Auction
• PVMWP Price Volatility Make Whole
Payment
• RAC Resource Adequacy Construct
• RDT Regional Directional Transfer
• RSG Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee
• RTORSGPReal-Time Offer Revenue
Sufficiency Guarantee Payment
• SMP System Marginal Price
• SOM State of the Market
• TLR Transmission Line Loading
• Relief
• TCDC Transmission Constraint
Demand Curve
• VLR Voltage and Local Reliability
• WUMS Wisconsin Upper Michigan
System