imls conclusions overview022708

20
Interconnections: The IMLS National Study on the Use of Libraries, Museums and the Internet José-Marie Griffiths, Dean and Professor Donald W. King, Distinguished Research Professor School of Information and Library Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Upload: wanda-monroe

Post on 31-May-2015

262 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Interconnections: The IMLS National Study on the Use of Libraries, Museums and the Internet

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Interconnections: The IMLS National Study on the Use of Libraries,

Museums and the Internet

José-Marie Griffiths, Dean and ProfessorDonald W. King, Distinguished Research Professor

School of Information and Library ScienceUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Page 2: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Overview

• Conduct national survey of information needs of users and potential users of online information

• Primary focus on museums, public libraries and the Internet as sources

• Telephone surveys of adults (18 and over)

Page 3: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Surveys

Page 4: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

The Power of Trust

Conclusion 1: Libraries and museums evoke

consistent, extraordinary public trust among diverse adult users.

Page 5: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Libraries and museums are the most trusted sources of information according to a survey of over 1,700 adults.

Page 6: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

The Internet Does Not Kill Libraries and Museums

Conclusion #2: Internet use is positively related to in-person visits to museums and

libraries.

Page 7: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Adults Who Use the Internet are More Likely to Visit Libraries and Museums

66.4%

38.3%

73.3%

66.7%

47.4%

71.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Proportion of Adult Visitors

Museums

PublicLibraries

Proportion of Public Library and Museum Visitors Who Use or Do Not Use the Internet

Internet usersNon-users of the InternetAll adults

Page 8: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Adults Who Use the Internet Visit Libraries and Museums More Often

3.14

1.34

3.46

3.42

3.36

3.44

1 2 3 4 5

Number of visits per adult

Museums

PublicLibraries

Average Number of Public Library and Museum Visits by Those Who Use and Do Not Use the Internet

Internet usersNon-users of the InternetAll adults

Page 9: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Amount of use of the Internet is positively correlated with the number of in-person visits to museums and has a positive effect on in-person visits to public libraries.

Trends in increased in-person visits to museums and public libraries are much more positive with adults who use the Internet than with those who do not.

Page 10: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Total Number of Visits to Museums by Adults, 2006

In-Person Visits 701 millionRemote Online Visits 542 million

Total Visits 1.2 billion

Total Number of Visits to Public Libraries by Adults, 2006

In-Person Visits 762 millionRemote Online Visits 558 million

Total Visits 1.3 billion

Page 11: Imls Conclusions Overview022708
Page 12: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

The number of remote online visits is positively correlated with the number of in-person visits to museums and public libraries.

Page 13: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Q. Why do we need museums and libraries if we have the Internet?A.Interconnections

Conclusion #3: Museums and public libraries

in-person and online serve important and complementary roles

in supporting a wide variety of information needs.

Page 14: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

To fulfill their need for information, most adults use museums, public libraries, and the Internet. Museums and public libraries are used by 70%, the Internet is used by 83%, and nearly half (47%) use all three. Only 7% of adults do not use any of the three sources.

Page 15: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

The vast majority of visitors to museums (95%) and public libraries (96%) visit in-person; 45% of museum visitors visit online and in-person and 42% of public library visitors visit online and in-person.

Page 16: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Interconnections

Page 17: Imls Conclusions Overview022708
Page 18: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

Both in-person and remote visits to museums are learning experiences with adults indicating they learned something new in 87% of in-person visits and 86% of remote visits. Children were helped with learning more in 8% of in-person visits and 5% of remote visits.

8.4%

37.2%

59.9%

75.8%

86.6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Proportion of In-Person Visits

Helped child learn more

New way of thinking

Learned about a specific topic

Encouraged further learning

Learned something new

Proportion of In-Person Visits to Museums by How They Learned

5.2%

29%

65.6%

81.2%

85.5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Proportion of Remote Visits

Helped child learn more

New way of thinking

Learned about a specific topic

Encouraged further learning

Learned something new

Proportion of Remote Visits to Museums by How They Learned

Page 19: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

The different modes of access to public libraries tend to address very different distributions of information needs. Online visits (both remote and in- library) are used much more for formal education and work-related needs than other in-person visits which are used much more for recreation or entertainment purposes.

Personal or family needs

25%

Recreation or entertainment

14%

Formal education

needs43%

Work-related needs18%

Most Important Purpose for Online (Remoteand in-library) Visits

Recreation or entertainment

47%

Work-related needs

6%

Formal education

needs26%

Personal or family needs

21%

Most Important Purpose for In-person Visits (not workstation use)

Most Important Purpose for All Visits

Personal or family needs

23%

Recreation or entertainment

30%

Work-related needs12%

Formal education

needs35%

Page 20: Imls Conclusions Overview022708

José-Marie Griffiths, PhD Dean and Professor Donald W. King

Distinguished Research Professor

• School of Information and Library Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

• Email: [email protected], [email protected]• phone: (919)962-8366

fax: (919)962-8071 • Mail:

School of Information and Library Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #3360100 Manning Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3360