imitation meat production process overview

1
BE 230 - Spring 2021 Engr. Analysis of Biological Systems Dr. Safferman The production process for plant-based meat substitutes begins with the extraction of proteins from raw plant materials, followed by the structuring of those proteins in a process called extrusion or, more rarely, shear cell processes. These procedures use heat and agitation to structure proteins and are critical for the the formation of convincing texture in the finished product. Although extrusion is the more common practice, shear cell has been shown to be more energy efficient. The next step in the process involves the use of color, flavor, and aroma components to form a more convincing product. In beef substitutes, beet extracts are commonly used for creating red coloring, while caramel coloring is used to create a final brown color. The more difficult part is isolating a specific combination of volatile and nonvolatile molecules to replicate the smell and taste of real meat. Once the product is finished, it must be treated for microbial contamination- imitation meats carry the same risks as their animal counterparts. Then, the product is packaged and shipped off to grocery stores, completing the rest of the lifecycle in much the same way as any other meat product.(3) This life cycle is shown in Figure 2 below. Imitation meat is currently seen as unnatural. Unfamiliar flavors and textures have caused an issue with consumer acceptance of these products. In order for meat imitation products to be implemented successfully, further research into consumer acceptance is required. Hypothesis: If imitation meat resembled traditional meat, in both taste and appearance, will consumers be more inclined to switch to imitation meat? Objectives/Tasks Have a focus group of individuals both vegetarian and omnivores, from all sorts of ethnic groups, locations, and socioeconomic backgrounds Add multiple focus groups to gather enough data to find similarities See what components of imitation meat the individuals in the focus group are most receptive to; rank taste, texture, and color based on importance Give focus groups different types of imitation meat and have them record which they liked more and why Analysis Identify patterns between consumer preferences within the focus group to better understand how to target certain demographics such as patterns within ethnic groups or dietary preferences Find which products of imitation meat did the best in each category (texture, taste, and color) and look to replicate each of the processes into one product Understand if improvements in these criteria result in acceptance of imitation meat products Figure 7. Consumer Acceptance based on Structuring Limitations (2) In the process of converting plant-based materials into a meat supplant, the most critical component is that of protein fibration. Protein fibration uses extrusion technologies to alter the physical properties plant based proteins express. New advancements in the fields are possible due to the twin screw extrusion process. As seen in Figure 5, the process has two main components. Figure 5: General Model of the Twin Screw Extrusion Process (5) An intake of raw materials is processed in a thermomechanical cooking process. As the screws rotate, the raw proteins are ripped into strands, an unfolded state, and are prepared for die fibration. During die fibration, the process proteins then undergo recombination and become crosslinked as a result. The general shape of the protein on a molecular level can be observed in Figure 6. Figure 6: Given Protein Structure After Processing Component (5) During the die fibration process, the proteins are formed into a single structure, which then can be altered later into desired shapes, such as that of a patty. While the general process may seem simple on paper, variables present in the system can alter the physical characteristics of the processed proteins, such as the following: Temperature: high temperatures are known to disrupt hydrogen bonds and non-polar hydrophobic interactions. Moisture: proteins are composed of hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions, with the amount of moisture affecting the reactions occurring during the process. Twin Screw: shape and time in the thermomechanical process can affect the properties given during the unfolded state. Die: shorter or longer periods can affect the the formation of the crosslinked state. These factors can play a major role in the end product. Texture, for example, can play a determining role in what the process protein will be used for. A protein sheet classified as rough and short, thick cross section oriented fibers, may be utilized for chicken strips. Meanwhile,a protein sheet classified as smooth and long, with laminar-flow oriented fibers, would be used for a pulled-pork substitute. How a batch of raw material is treated will ultimately determine what the end product will be used and treated for.(5) Among those looking for plant-based meats, one of the big reasons is usually to be more environmentally friendly. Some of the impacts people are concerned about are water usage, land usage, greenhouse gas emission, and eutrophication. Figure 3 shows that cattle have the worst effects in energy greenhouse gas emission, eutrophication, and land use, and the second worst effects in energy consumption.(6) Figure 3: Comparison of the environmental impact of meat and meat analogs (7) However, the most popular meat across the world is pork at 36% of all consumed meat(. According to Impossible Foods (a popular meat alternative brand), the pork substitutes have a much smaller environmental impact. ”Impossible Sausage generates 71% less greenhouse gases, requires 41% less land area in a year, has 79% lower water footprint, and generates 57% less aquatic eutrophication” (4). Figure 4 shows the difference between Impossible sausages and pork sausage, in both the United States and Asia. Across the board, Impossible Sausage is less impactful on the environment than traditional pork sausages. Figure 4: Impact of Impossible Sausage vs pork sausage (4) Given that beef has some of the worst effects, it is important to consider the Impossible Food version of beef as well, even though it is consumed less frequently than pork. Again, across the board, the Impossible product has a huge reduction in environmental impacts(4). Table 1: Results for 1kg Impossible Burger vs beef burger (4) Imitation meat is a plant-based meat alternative that is increasing in popularity with consumers due to its environmental and health benefits compared to animal meat. Figure 1 shows that numerous companies have started creating plant based alternatives, catering to different demographic from vegans, vegetarians, and omnivores, using different techniques to try and mimic the flavor, texture, and color of animal meat. This poster analyzes the process of the production of imitation meat, along with looking at the environmental impacts, sensitive units and areas that require future research in order for the implementation of imitation meat to be successful. Figure 1: Meat Imitation Products from a variety of brands (4) 1. AskUSDA. (2019, July 17). Retrieved March 28, 2021, from https://ask.usda.gov/s/article/What-is-the-most-consumed-meat-in-the-world#: ~:text=According%20to%20the%20United%20Nations,goats%2Fsheep%20(5 %25) 2. Fiorentini, M., Kinchla, A. J., & Nolden, A. A. (2020). Role of Sensory Evaluation in Consumer Acceptance of Plant-Based Meat Analogs and Meat Extenders: A Scoping Review. Foods, 9(9), 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091334 3. He, J., Evans, N. M., Liu, H., & Shao, S. (2020). A review of research on plantbased meat alternatives: Driving forces, history, manufacturing, and consumer attitudes. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 19(5), 2639-2656. doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12610 4. Hopkins, T. (n.d.). Taste Test: Plant-Based Burgers. Epicurious. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://www.epicurious.com/ingredients/best-meatless-burger-beyond-impossi ble-taste-test-plant-based-burger-article 5. Impossible foods: Meat made from plants. (n.d.). Retrieved March 28, 2021, from https://impossiblefoods.com/ 6. Prepared Foods. (2018). The Ultimate Meats Substitutes Guide. https://www.preparedfoods.com/ext/resources/Special_Reports/2018/Clextral- Ultimate-Meat-Substitutes-Guide.pdf 7. Rubio, N. R., Xiang, N., & Kaplan, D. L. (2020). Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production. Nature Communications, 11(1), 6276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20061-y Introduction Process Description Potential Impact Eco. Services Research References Imitation Meat Production Process Overview Adam Easter, John Grivins, Reema Patel, Madison Pritchett, Alexis Sawicki Sensitive Unit Figure 2. Life cycle flowchart of a plant-based meat substitute (Grivins)

Upload: others

Post on 22-Mar-2022

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

BE 230 - Spring 2021Engr. Analysis of Biological SystemsDr. Safferman

The production process for plant-based meat substitutes begins with the extraction of proteins from raw plant materials, followed by the structuring of those proteins in a process called extrusion or, more rarely, shear cell processes. These procedures use heat and agitation to structure proteins and are critical for the the formation of convincing texture in the finished product. Although extrusion is the more common practice, shear cell has been shown to be more energy efficient. The next step in the process involves the use of color, flavor, and aroma components to form a more convincing product. In beef substitutes, beet extracts are commonly used for creating red coloring, while caramel coloring is used to create a final brown color. The more difficult part is isolating a specific combination of volatile and nonvolatile molecules to replicate the smell and taste of real meat.Once the product is finished, it must be treated for microbial contamination- imitation meats carry the same risks as their animal counterparts. Then, the product is packaged and shipped off to grocery stores, completing the rest of the lifecycle in much the same way as any other meat product.(3) This life cycle is shown in Figure 2 below.

Imitation meat is currently seen as unnatural. Unfamiliar flavors and textures have caused an issue with consumer acceptance of these products. In order for meat imitation products to be implemented successfully, further research into consumer acceptance is required.

Hypothesis: If imitation meat resembled traditional meat, in both taste and appearance, will consumers be more inclined to switch to imitation meat?

Objectives/Tasks● Have a focus group of individuals both vegetarian

and omnivores, from all sorts of ethnic groups,locations, and socioeconomic backgrounds

● Add multiple focus groups to gather enough data tofind similarities

● See what components of imitation meat theindividuals in the focus group are most receptive to;rank taste, texture, and color based on importance

● Give focus groups different types of imitation meatand have them record which they liked more and why

Analysis ● Identify patterns between consumer preferences

within the focus group to better understand how totarget certain demographics such as patterns withinethnic groups or dietary preferences

● Find which products of imitation meat did the best ineach category (texture, taste, and color) and look toreplicate each of the processes into one product

● Understand if improvements in these criteria result inacceptance of imitation meat products

Figure 7. Consumer Acceptance based on Structuring Limitations (2)

In the process of converting plant-based materials into a meat supplant, the most critical component is that of protein fibration. Protein fibration uses extrusion technologies to alter the physical properties plant based proteins express. New advancements in the fields are possible due to the twin screw extrusion process. As seen in Figure 5, the process has two main components.

Figure 5: General Model of the Twin Screw Extrusion Process (5)

An intake of raw materials is processed in a thermomechanical cooking process. As the screws rotate, the raw proteins are ripped into strands, an unfolded state, and are prepared for die fibration. During die fibration, the process proteins then undergo recombination and become crosslinked as a result. The general shape of the protein on a molecular level can be observed in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Given Protein Structure After Processing Component (5)

During the die fibration process, the proteins are formed into a single structure, which then can be altered later into desired shapes, such as that of a patty. While the general process may seem simple on paper, variables present in the system can alter the physical characteristics of the processed proteins, such as the following:

● Temperature: high temperatures are known to disrupthydrogen bonds and non-polar hydrophobicinteractions.

● Moisture: proteins are composed of hydrophobic andhydrophilic interactions, with the amount of moistureaffecting the reactions occurring during the process.

● Twin Screw: shape and time in the thermomechanicalprocess can affect the properties given during theunfolded state.

● Die: shorter or longer periods can affect the theformation of the crosslinked state.

These factors can play a major role in the end product. Texture, for example, can play a determining role in what the process protein will be used for. A protein sheet classified as rough and short, thick cross section oriented fibers, may be utilized for chicken strips. Meanwhile,a protein sheet classified as smooth and long, with laminar-flow oriented fibers, would be used for a pulled-pork substitute. How a batch of raw material is treated will ultimately determine what the end product will be used and treated for.(5)

Among those looking for plant-based meats, one of the big reasons is usually to be more environmentally friendly. Some of the impacts people are concerned about are water usage, land usage, greenhouse gas emission, and eutrophication. Figure 3 shows that cattle have the worst effects in energy greenhouse gas emission, eutrophication, and land use, and the second worst effects in energy consumption.(6)

Figure 3: Comparison of the environmental impact of meat andmeat analogs (7)

However, the most popular meat across the world is pork at 36% of all consumed meat(. According to Impossible Foods (a popular meat alternative brand), the pork substitutes have a much smaller environmental impact. ”Impossible Sausage generates 71% less greenhouse gases, requires 41% less land area in a year, has 79% lower water footprint, and generates 57% less aquatic eutrophication” (4). Figure 4 shows the difference between Impossible sausages and pork sausage, in both the United States and Asia. Across the board, Impossible Sausage is less impactful on the environment than traditional pork sausages.

Figure 4: Impact of Impossible Sausage vs pork sausage (4)Given that beef has some of the worst effects, it is important to consider the Impossible Food version of beef as well, even though it is consumed less frequently than pork. Again, across the board, the Impossible product has a huge reduction in environmental impacts(4). Table 1: Results for 1kg Impossible Burger vs beef burger (4)

Imitation meat is a plant-based meat alternative that is increasing in popularity with consumers due to its environmental and health benefits compared to animal meat. Figure 1 shows that numerous companies have started creating plant based alternatives, catering to different demographic from vegans, vegetarians, and omnivores, using different techniques to try and mimic the flavor, texture, and color of animal meat. This poster analyzes the process of the production of imitation meat, along with looking at the environmental impacts, sensitive units and areas that require future research in order for the implementation of imitation meat to be successful.

Figure 1: Meat Imitation Products from a variety of brands (4)

1. AskUSDA. (2019, July 17). Retrieved March 28, 2021, fromhttps://ask.usda.gov/s/article/What-is-the-most-consumed-meat-in-the-world#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20United%20Nations,goats%2Fsheep%20(5%25)

2. Fiorentini, M., Kinchla, A. J., & Nolden, A. A. (2020). Role of SensoryEvaluation in Consumer Acceptance of Plant-Based Meat Analogs and MeatExtenders: A Scoping Review. Foods, 9(9), 1334.https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091334

3. He, J., Evans, N. M., Liu, H., & Shao, S. (2020). A review of research onplant‐based meat alternatives: Driving forces, history, manufacturing, andconsumer attitudes. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and FoodSafety, 19(5), 2639-2656. doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12610

4. Hopkins, T. (n.d.). Taste Test: Plant-Based Burgers. Epicurious. RetrievedApril 18, 2021, fromhttps://www.epicurious.com/ingredients/best-meatless-burger-beyond-impossible-taste-test-plant-based-burger-article

5. Impossible foods: Meat made from plants. (n.d.). RetrievedMarch 28, 2021, from https://impossiblefoods.com/

6. Prepared Foods. (2018). The Ultimate Meats Substitutes Guide.https://www.preparedfoods.com/ext/resources/Special_Reports/2018/Clextral-Ultimate-Meat-Substitutes-Guide.pdf

7. Rubio, N. R., Xiang, N., & Kaplan, D. L. (2020). Plant-based and cell-basedapproaches to meat production. Nature Communications, 11(1), 6276.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20061-y

Introduction

Process Description

Potential Impact Eco. Services

Research

References

Imitation Meat Production Process OverviewAdam Easter, John Grivins, Reema Patel, Madison Pritchett, Alexis

SawickiSensitive Unit

Figure 2. Life cycle flowchart of a plant-based meat substitute(Grivins)