imeneo study
TRANSCRIPT
International MEta-analysis
of circulating tumor cell detection
in early breast cancer pts
treated by NEOadjuvant chemotherapy (IMENEO study)
FC Bidard*, S Michiels, V Mueller, S Riethdorf, LJ Esserman, A Lucci, B Naume, J Horiguchi, R Gisbert-Criado, S Sleijfer, M Toi, JA Garcia-Saenz, A Hartkopf, D Generali, F Rothé, J Smerage, L Muinelo, J Stebbing, P Viens, M Magbanua, CS Hall, O Engebraaten, D Takata, J Vidal-Martínez, W Onstenk, N Fujisawa, E Diaz-Rubio, FA Taran, MR Cappelletti, M Ignatiadis, C Proudhon, D Wolf, J Bowman Bauldry, E Borgen, R Nagaoka, V Carañana, J Kraan, M Maestro, SY Brucker, K Weber, F Reyal, D Amara, MG Karhade, RR Mathiesen, H Tokiniwa, A Llombart-Cussac, K d'Hollander, P Cottu, JW Park, S Loibl, JY Pierga, K Pantel
* Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
FC BidardResearch grant from Janssen Diagnostics to Institut Curie
K d'HollanderIDDI employee
Disclosures
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
Circulating Tumors Cells (CTCs)CTCs are the “seeds” of distant metastases
In metastatic BC patients- prognostic factor before & during therapy- dynamic changes of CTCs >> serum markersCristofanilli et al., N Engl J Med 2004; Bidard et al., Lancet Oncol 2014
In non-metastatic BC patients- prognostic factor before adjuvant therapyLucci et al., Lancet Oncol 2012; Rack et al., J Natl Cancer Inst 2014
CTCs can be counted with the FDA-cleared CellSearch® system
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
CTCs in neoadjuvant settingFirst study with CellSearch®, N=118 pts (REMAGUS02)
Numerous studies initiated worldwidevery few published / heterogeneous results
No significant association between CTC detection and pCR
Prognostic impact on:
Distant-Metastasis-Free SurvivalPierga et al., Clin Cancer Res 2008
Overall SurvivalBidard et al., Ann Oncol 2010
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
ObjectivesStudy objectives were pre-specified in a written protocol
Iry objective: Overall Survival (OS)
IIry objectives: - Association with baseline characteristics (includ. T4d vs non T4d)- Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS)- Locoregional Relapse-Free Interval (LRFI)- Association with pCR- Exploration of CTC-positivity thresholds- To measure the added value of CTC count to clinically-optimized prognostic models
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
Methods- literature & abstracts search up to Dec 2014- direct contact with all centers deemed to have eligible data:
CTC count by CellSearch® Early BC pts treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) Survival (published or not)
Non-overlapping CTC time points:○ [-5;0] weeks before NCT = baseline○ [1;8] weeks after start of NCT○ [-5;0] weeks before the surgery○ [1;52] weeks after surgery
StatisticsCox regression models (stratified by study) & landmark method Overfitting bias of multivariate prognostic models (used to report average increases in likelihood ratio) was limited by resampling procedures
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
Data collection
#2,000 potentially eligible pts from 18 centers
2 centersoff study
Letter of intent
call for data
2,239 pts data received
data cleaning 83 excluded
2,156 individual patients 21 studies 16 centers
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
N= 1,574 pts N= 290 pts
N= 1,200 ptsN= 285 pts
[-5;0]w before start of NCT[1;8w]w after start of NCT[-5;0]w before surgery[1;52]w after surgery
CTC data collected:
7.5ml of blood (1 tube) analyzedfor >95% of CTC points
Data collection
#2,000 potentially eligible pts from 18 centers
2 centersoff study
Letter of intent
call for data
2,239 pts data received
data cleaning 83 excluded
2,156 individual patients 21 studies 16 centers
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
N patients ≥1 CTC ≥2 CTC ≥5 CTC1574 25.2% 12.6% 5.9%Before NCT
CTC detection
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
N patients ≥1 CTC ≥2 CTC ≥5 CTC1574 25.2% 12.6% 5.9%
1200 15.1% 5.3% 1.0%
Before NCT
CTC detection
Before surgery
Decrease during NCT: p<.0001
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
N patients ≥1 CTC ≥2 CTC ≥5 CTC continuous1574 25.2% 12.6% 5.9%
cT size p<.0001 p<.0001 p<.0001 p<.0001cT1 122 (7.9%) 18.9% 8.2% 3.3%cT2 770 (49.8%) 22.3% 10.3% 3.5%cT3 343 (22.2%) 24.2% 12.2% 6.1%cT4a-c 108 (7.0%) 28.7% 16.7% 8.3%cT4d 204 (13.2%) 41.2% 24.5% 15.7%
cN status p=.051 p=.021 p=.009 p=.024cN0 656 (41.9%) 22.7% 10.4% 4.1%cN+ 911 (58.1%) 27.1% 14.4% 7.2%
Subgroup p=.23 p=.028 p=0.54 p=.12
HER2+ 365 (23.2%) 24.1% 11.0% 4.7%HR+ 800 (51.0%) 24.1% 11.5% 5.3%Triple Neg. 405 (25.8%) 28.4% 16.5% 8.4%
CTC detection & baseline characteristics
Before NCT
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
N patients ≥1 CTC ≥2 CTC ≥5 CTC continuous1370 22.9% 10.8% 4.4%
cT size p=.31 p=.15 p=.049 p=.21
cT1 122 (9.1%) 18.9% 8.2% 3.3%cT2 770 (56.9%) 22.3% 10.3% 3.5%cT3 343 (25.5%) 24.2% 12.2% 6.1%cT4a-c 108 (8.0%) 28.7% 16.7% 8.3%cT4d EXCLUDED
cN status p=.22 p=.19 p=.24 p=.17
cN0 604 (44.3%) 21.4% 9.6% 3.6%cN+ 760 (55.7%) 24.2% 12.0% 5.1%
Subgroup p=.44 p=.36 p=.13 p=.37
HER2+ 292 (21.4%) 20.2% 8.9% 2.4%HR+ 738 (54.0%) 23.2% 11.0% 5.1%Triple Neg. 336 (24.6%) 24.4% 12.5% 4.8%
CTC detection & baseline characteristics, T4d excluded
Before NCT
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
CTC detection: association with pCR
pCR was defined as ypT0/isN0 in 92.5% of patients (N=1916/2072)
pCR was observed in 24.3% of patients (N=503/2072)
N patients ≥1 CTC ≥2 CTC ≥5 CTC continuousp=.076 p=.65 p=.90 p=.10
pCR 374 (24.0%) 21.7% 12.0% 6.1%No pCR 1183 (76.0%) 26.3% 13.0% 5.9%
p=.45 p=.13 p=.53 p=.52pCR 300 (26.3%) 13.7% 7.0% 1.3%No pCR 841 (73.7%) 15.7% 4.6% 1.0%
CTC before NCT
CTC before surgery
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
N pts0 CTC 11751 CTC 1992 CTC 59
3-4 CTC 47≥ 5 CTC 93
CTC before NCT & Overall Survival
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
N pts % Events Hazard Ratio0 CTC 1175 9.8% 11 CTC 199 10.6% 1.09 [0.65-1.69]2 CTC 59 23.7% 2.63 [1.42-4.54]
3-4 CTC 47 29.8% 3.84 [2.08-6.66]≥ 5 CTC 93 46.2% 6.25 [4.34-9.09]
Stratified p value <.0001
months
CTC before NCT & Overall Survival
Same HR observed without T4d tumors No interaction found with tumor subtype
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
CTC before NCT & Distant Disease-Free Survival
N pts % Events Hazard Ratio0 CTC 1175 14.6% 11 CTC 199 18.1% 1.19 [0.81-1.69]2 CTC 59 33.9% 2.44 [1.47-3.84]
3-4 CTC 47 38.3% 3.44 [1.96-5.55]≥ 5 CTC 93 58.1% 5.00 [3.57-7.14]
Stratified p value <.0001
monthsSame HR observed without T4d tumors No interaction found with tumor subtype
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
CTC before NCT & Locoregional Relapse-Free Interval
N pts % Events Hazard Ratio0 CTC 1175 6.7% 11 CTC 199 6.0% 0.89 [0.46-1.61]2 CTC 59 15.3% 2.43 [1.12-4.76]
3-4 CTC 47 4.3% 1.23 [0.20-4.00]≥ 5 CTC 93 22.6% 4.16 [2.32-6.66]
months
Stratified p value <.0001
Same HR observed without T4d tumors No interaction found with tumor subtype
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
Overall clinical validity (threshold ≥2 CTC)Multivariate analysesTime point OS
HR p
CTC at baseline(landmark analysis)
4.19 [2.97-5.88]
<.0001
cT T3-T4T4d
1.49 2.94
.0023
cN cN1 1.65 .0045Subgroup HER2+
Triple Neg1.69 5.24
<.0001
pCR No 5.88 <.0001
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
Overall clinical validity (threshold ≥2 CTC)Multivariate analysesTime point OS DDFS LRFI
HR p HR p HR p
CTC at baseline(landmark analysis)
4.19 [2.97-5.88]
<.0001 3.79 [2.84-5.03]
<.0001 3.20[1.93-5.19]
<.0001
CTC [-5;0]w before surgery(landmark analysis)
2.56[1.45-4.23]
.0020 2.69[1.67-4.12]
<.0001 1.05[0.32-2.55]
.92
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
Changes during therapy; ≥2 CTC
Distant Disease-Free SurvivalLandmark analysis
Overall SurvivalLandmark analysis
N
<2 / <2 CTC 609
<2 / >2 CTC 21
>2 / <2 CTC 103
>2 / >2 CTC 11
N
<2 / <2 CTC 606
<2 / >2 CTC 21
>2 / <2 CTC 103
>2 / >2 CTC 10
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
Changes during therapy; ≥2 CTC
Distant Disease-Free SurvivalLandmark analysisStratified p value p<.0001
Overall SurvivalLandmark analysisStratified p value p<.0001
N HR
<2 / <2 CTC 609 1
<2 / >2 CTC 21 3.57>2 / <2 CTC 103 4.29>2 / >2 CTC 11 9.68
N HR
<2 / <2 CTC 606 1
<2 / >2 CTC 21 3.89>2 / <2 CTC 103 4.18>2 / >2 CTC 10 4.94
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
Added value to comprehensive prognostic models
Model (1) Model (2) Endpoint Average increase in Chi2 [95% CI] P value
Baseline
(resampling procedure)
Baseline + CTC baseline
OS
DDFS
LRFI
Baseline+ CTC baseline+ pCR(resampling & landmark)
Baseline+ CTC baseline+ pCR+ CTC before surgery
OS
DDFS
LRFI
Likelihood ratio tests
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
Added value to comprehensive prognostic models
Model (1) Model (2) Endpoint Average increase in Chi2 [95% CI] P value
Baseline
(resampling procedure)
Baseline + CTC baseline
OS 28.9 [13.3-44.1] <.0001
DDFS 38.7 [21.9-58.5] <.0001
LRFI 8.7 [2.4-19.2] .003
Baseline+ CTC baseline+ pCR(resampling & landmark)
Baseline+ CTC baseline+ pCR+ CTC before surgery
OS 3.1 [0.03-11.3] .07
DDFS 3.1 [0.02-9.7] .07
LRFI 0.9 [0.00-3.5] .34
Likelihood ratio tests
This presentation is the intellectual property of the presenter. contact [email protected] for permission to reprint/ distribute.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
Conclusion
CTC number-dependent impact on OS, DDFS and LRFI
significant above ≥2 CTC/7.5ml
Post-neoadjuvant survival does not exclusively rely on breast cancer
characteristics & pCR
CTC complements (but not dupplicates) usual prognostic factors
Next steps: - clinical utility trials (e.g. post-neoadjuvant therapy)
- further biological characterization
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
S MichielsJY PiergaP CottuC ProudhonF ReyalP Viens
B NaumeE BorgenO EngebraatenRR Mathiesen
S SleijferJ KraanW Onstenk
D GeneraliMR Cappelletti
Thank you
K d'HollanderE Coart
K PantelA HartkopfS LoiblV MuellerS RiethdorfSY BruckerFA TaranK Weber
J HoriguchiM ToiN FujisawaR NagaokaD TakataH Tokiniwa
JA Garcia-SaenzR Gisbert-CriadoL MuineloV CarañanaE Diaz-RubioA Llombart-CussacM MaestroJ Vidal-Martínez
LJ EssermanA LucciJ SmerageD AmaraJ Bowman BauldryCS HallD HayesMG KarhadeM MagbanuaJW ParkD Wolf
M IgnatiadisF Rothé
J Stebbing