imaps 2003 presentation by eps
TRANSCRIPT
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 1
Unique Metal-to-Glass Bonding Process
for Hermetic Packaging of MicroOptoElectroMechanical Systems
(MOEMS) and Other Applications
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 2
HERMETIC
Completely sealed, especially against the escape or entry of air. (airtight)
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 3
MicroOptoElectroMechanical Systems (MOEMS) and Other Electro-Optics Devices
Often Require a Transparent Window Assembly
Packaging Options Include:
• Packaging one or more devices in an individual package
• Wafer-level packaging (WLP), where a window or window assembly is attached to a substrate containing multiple devices
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 4
AGENDA• Characteristics of Kovar and Glass• Common Glass-to-Metal Sealing Methods
– Compression Seals, Metal-alloy Solder Seals and Solder-glass Seals
• Attributes of a More Efficient Hermetic Window Assembly Process
• Diffusion Bonding Process• Kovar-to-glass Diffusion Bonding Trials• Near-Term Plans• Summary of Technology Development• Approved and Pending Patents
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 5
KOVAR’S ALPHA* = INSTANTANEOUS CTE (CTE AT A SPECIFIC TEMPERATURE)
4.05.06.07.08.09.010.011.012.013.014.015.016.017.018.019.020.0
-175
-150
-125
-100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 435 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1,000
1,050
1,100
CT
E (p
pm/0 C
)
Temperature (Degrees C)
6.6 ppm/0C @ 250
4.3 ppm/0C @ 3000
18.1 ppm/0C @ 7500
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 6
KOVAR’S AVERAGE CTE FROM 300C
4.55.56.57.58.59.510.511.5
200 300 400 450 500 600 700 800 900
Avg
. CT
E in
ppm
/0 C
Degrees C
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 7
TYPICAL THERMAL EXPANSION-TEMPERATURE CURVE FOR GLASSES
With few exceptions, the length and the volume of glasses increase with increasing temperature (positive coefficient.
• At about room temperature (section A), the curve shows a distinct bend and then gradually increases up to the beginning of the experimentally detectable plastic behavior (section B = quasi-linear region).
•A distinct bend in the extension curve characterizes the transition from the predominantly elastic to the more plastic behavior of the glass (section C = transformation range).
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 8
TYPICAL VISCOSITY-TEMPERATURE CURVE FOR GLASS
At temperatures around the Softening Point, glass products deform rapidly under their own weight (forming by "sagging"). The softening point is defined as the temperature at which the glass has a viscosity of 107.6 poise . (ISO 7884-3)
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 9
COMMON GLASS-TO-METAL SEALING METHODS
Compression Seals, Metal-alloy Solder Seals and Solder-glass Seals• Assembly Methods
• Advantages and Disadvantages
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 10
COMPRESSION SEALS1. Fabricate Frame
A. Create Opening for Glass WindowB. Oxidize Frame
2. Fabricate Window to fit into frame’s opening
3. Fuse window to oxidized wall of frame opening
A. Fixture (constrain) glass in Z-axisB. Heat unit above Tg of glass to allow glass to
expand and flow against frame wallC. Cool unit
• Frame shrinks more than glass window, holding window in compression
4. Grind and polish glass5. Metal plate frame (typically Au over Ni)
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 11
KOVAR’S AVERAGE CTE FROM 300C
4.55.56.57.58.59.510.511.5
200 300 400 450 500 600 700 800 900
Avg
. CT
E in
ppm
/0 C
Degrees C
Typical Compression
Bonding Temperatures
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 12
COMPRESSION SEALS (CONT.)
Advantages:• Compression holds glass in place
• Frame contracts more than glass during cooling
Disadvantages:• Numerous process and handling
steps after bonding• High potential to cause scrap
• Very expensive
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 13
Window
Frame’s Flange
Window Metallized On
Its Bottom
Solder Preform
Frame’s Seal Ring
SOLDERED GLASS-TO-METAL SEALS USING A PRE-METALLIZED WINDOW AND A SOLDER PREFORM (METAL-ALLOY SOLDER SEALS)
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 14
Kovar’s Average CTE From 300C
4.55.56.57.58.59.510.511.5
200 300 400 450 500 600 700 800 900
Avg
. CT
E in
ppm
/0 C
Degrees C
Metal-Alloy Solder Seals
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 15
METAL-ALLOY SOLDER SEALS (CONT.)
Advantages:
• Large production base of required process equipment
• Simple solder-bonding procedure• Typically performed in a chain furnace with a
reducing atmosphere• Readily available solder preforms easily die-cut to
size. • Eutectic Au/Sn is most commonly used solder
alloy.
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 16
METAL-ALLOY SOLDER SEALS (CONT.)
Disadvantages:• Windows must be metallized to be soldered to frames
• Typically thin films• Application of the thin film metals can cost more
than the glass• The cooled glass is usually under tension, and often
cracks• The solder bonding the frame to the window might
reflow during the welding of the window assembly to the package base, allowing delamination of the window.
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 17
SOLDERED GLASS-TO-METAL SEAL USING SOLDER-GLASS (PREFORM OR PASTE)
Kovar Frame’s Flange
Window
Window
Solder-Glass Preform or Paste
Kovar Frame’s
Seal Ring
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 18
KOVAR’S AVERAGE CTE FROM 300CA
vg. C
TE
in p
pm/0 C
Degrees C
5.5
8.5
4.5
6.57.5
9.510.511.5
200
300
400
450
500
600
700
800
900Majority of
Solder-Glass Seals
Minority of Solder-Glass
Seals
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 19
SOLDER-GLASS SEALED PHOTODIODES
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 20
SOLDER-GLASS SEALS
Advantages:• Can bond glass to other glasses, ceramics, or metals
without thermally damaging the materials to be joined
• Usually costs less than prior two bonding methods
Disadvantages:• Requires intermediate material (solder-glass)• Must take care to select right solder-glass and seam
welding parameter to prevent reflowing the solder-glass
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 21
ATTRIBUTES OF A MORE EFFICIENT
HERMETIC WINDOW ASSEMBLY PROCESS
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 22
ATTRIBUTES OF A MORE EFFICIENT HERMETIC WINDOW ASSEMBLY PROCESS
Simplicity• Direct bonding of the frame to glass without an intermediate joining material
• No solder alloy, solder-glass, etc.
• Ability to use finished glass during the glass-to-metal sealing process
• No post-assembly grinding and/or polishing• Any required coatings could be applied either before or after bonding, including anti-reflective (A/R), ultra-violet (UV) and plated metals• Ability to bond concave or convex glass to the metal frame
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 23
PROCESS APPROACH: DIFFUSION BONDING
Diffusion BondingJoints can be made between similar and dissimilar metals, alloys, and nonmetals, through the action of diffusion of atoms across the interface, brought about by the bonding pressure and heat applied for a specified length of time.
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 24
PROCESS PROFILE FOR CONVENTIONAL DIFFUSION BONDING
Tem
pera
ture
Time
A B C
The load (pressure) is applied during time zone B.
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 25
PROPERTIES OF JOINTS FORMED BY 3 BONDING PROCESSES
Particulars Diffusion Bonding Brazing, Soldering Fusion Welding
Warpage None Light Heavy
Disassembly of joint No Yes NoVibration survival Very high High Low
Corrosion resistance Fairly high Low Satisfactory
Strength That of parent metal or material That of solder Close to that of
parent metal
Bonding Adhesive, diffusion Cohesive, adhesive Cohesive
Susceptibility to solidification cracking
None Weak Strong
Porosity None Blowholes, shrinkage, diffusion
Shrinkage, blowholes
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 26
VACUUM DIFFUSION BONDING SYSTEM (VACUUM HOT-PRESS)
System with controller (left), vacuum hot-press chamber (center) and vacuum diffusion pump (right)
Radiant heat box inside the vacuum chamber: The working zone
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 27
SEMI-CONTINUOUS VACUUM FURNACES
Valve Valve
Load / Preheat Cooling / Unload
Load UnloadTransfer Transfer
Vacuum or Other
Atmosphere
High Heat
EvacuatePreheatDegas
Hot PressDiffusion Bond
Gas QuenchPost Process
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 28
SEMI-CONTINUOUS VACUUM FURNACES
Semi-Continuous Furnace - Processing 2000 lb loads on 65 by 65 inch grids. Load/unload and return conveyor system.
Advanced Vacuum Systems, Inc. Ayer, Massachusetts
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 29
Continuous Hot Press
Chugai Ro Co.,Ltd. Osaka, Japan
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 30
Glass-to-KovarBonding Trials
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 31
MATERIALS FOR OCTOBER 2002 KOVAR-TO-GLASS DIFFUSION BONDING TRIALS
From left to right: • Oxidized kovar frame• Non-oxidized kovar frame• Corning 7056 glass
Kovar Frame:Outside Dimension: 1” SquareWall Width: 0.040”Wall Height: 0.140”Corner Radius: 0.02” ID; 0.06” OD
Corning 7056 Glass Piece:Dimensions: 1.6” Square by 0.135”
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 32
CORNING 7056 GLASS PROPERTIES
Characteristic Value
Viscosity
Working Point (104 poise) 1058°C
Softening Point (107.6 poise) 718°C
Annealing Point (1013 poise) 512°C
Transformation Temperature (Tg) N/A
Strain Point (1014 poise) 472°C
Thermal Coefficient of Expansion (0-300°C) 5.15 x 10-6/°C
CTE (25°C to set point 679°C) 5.45 x 10-6/°C
Sheet Thickness 0.135”
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 33
CORNING 7056 GLASS PROPERTIES (CONT.)
Element ValueSilicon < 35 %Potassium < 10 %Boron < 10 %Aluminum < 2 %Sodium < 1 %Lithium < 1 %Antimony < 1 %Arsenic < 1 %
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 34
Fixturing of the kovar frames and the glass inside the diffusion bonding
chamber.
Kovar frame, pre-oxidized
Base
Kovar frame,not pre-oxidized
Glass
Spacers
AppliedPressureHydraulic
Ram
DIFFUSION BONDING OF GLASS TO KOVAR FRAMES
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 35
TYPICAL VISCOSITY-TEMPERATURE CURVE FOR GLASS
At temperatures around the Softening Point, glass products deform rapidly under their own weight (forming by "sagging"). The softening point is defined as the temperature at which the glass has a viscosity of 107.6 poise . (ISO 7884-3)
Diffusion Bonding
Zone
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 36
KOVAR’S AVERAGE CTE FROM 300C
Degrees C
4.55.56.57.58.59.510.511.5
200 300 400 450 500 600 700 800 900
Avg
. CT
E in
ppm
/0 CBonding
Trials: Load Applied between 4500C to
6650C
Corning 7056’s
Softening Point: 7180C
Corning 7056’s Average CTE:
5.15 ppm/ 0C from 0-3000C 5.45 ppm/ 0C from 2500C to 6790C
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 37
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS FROM CORNING 7056 TRIALSUnable to Achieve Evidence of Diffusion Bonding of the Glass to the Kovar Alloy
Four of the five diffusion-bonding trials produced limited optical distortion of the glass adjacent to the bond area. This distortion was a result of the displacement of the glass away from the frame during creep.
Limiting the creep reduces the width of the optically distorted region on each side of the frame.
Different temperature, pressure and time parameters than those used previously will be required for Corning 7056 glass to achieve not just mechanical bonding to kovar but also the desired diffusion bond.
Glasses with different chemical compositions, viscosities and thermal properties than the Corning 7056 might be required.
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 38
SECOND SET OF TRIALS, JANUARY 2003:SCHOTT AF-45 GLASS
Characteristic Corning 7056 Schott AF-45Viscosity
Working Point (104 poise) 1058°C
Softening Point (107.6 poise) 718°C 8830CAnnealing Point (1013 poise) 512°C 6630C
Transformation Temperature (Tg) 6620C
Strain Point (1014 poise) 472°C 6270C
Thermal Coefficient of Expansion (0-300°C) 5.15 x 10-6/°C
Coefficient of Expansion (20-300°C) 4.5 x 10-6/°C
CTE (25°C to set point 679°C) 5.45 x 10-6/°C
Sheet Thickness 0.135” 0.044”
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 39
COMPARISON OF GLASSES’ CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS Element Corning 7056 Molecule Schott AF-45Silicon < 35 % SiO2 49.6 %
Potassium < 10 % K2O
Boron < 10 % B2O3 14.2 %
Aluminum < 2 % Al2O3 11.4 %
Sodium < 1 % Na2O3
Lithium < 1 %
Antimony < 1 % Sb2O3
Barium BaO 24.1 %
Arsenic < 1 % As2O3 0.9 %
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 40
KOVAR’S AVERAGE CTE FROM 300C A
vg. C
TE
in p
pm/0 C
Degrees C
4.55.56.57.58.59.510.511.5
200 300 400 450 500 600 700 800 900
Diffusion Bonding Temperature Zone Used For Loading
Schott AF-45 Glass: 7000C to 8000C
Temperature Zone Used For Loading
Corning 7056 Glass:
4500C to 6650C
Corning 7056’s
Softening Point: 7180C
Schott AF-45’s
Softening Point: 8830C
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 41
TRIAL #1 WITH SCHOTT AF-45 GLASS
Two kovar frames, 1.3” x 3.7” with 0.08” wide surface, diffusion bonded to a 4” square by 0.044” thick piece of Schott AF-45 glass.
Left Photo: Assembly held verticallyRight Photo: Assembly on grid paper
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 42
TRIAL #2 WITH SCHOTT AF-45 GLASS
Two 1.3” x 3.7” frames, each on a 2” x 4” piece of glass before bonding
Glass diffusion bonded to frame:• Glass outside frame perimeter cracked during bonding cool-down
•Glass bonded to, and remained on 100% of frame’s surface
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 43
CONCLUSIONS FROM SCHOTT AF-45 GLASS BONDING TRIALS
Destructive tests demonstrated that the glass-to-metal seal is permanent
• Dropped bonded assemblies onto concrete from a height of 5 feet, shattering the glass inside and outside the perimeter of the metal frame
• The metal frames still had 100% coverage of glass
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 44
CONCLUSIONS FROM SCHOTT AF-45 GLASS BONDING TRIALS (cont.)
1. The thickness of the frames’ oxidation layer may be critical • This variable requires controlled tests
2. Increasing the surface area of the frame in contact with glass improves bonding• Thinner walls act as knife edges forced through butter
3. The CTE of AF-45 glass is too low for reliable diffusion bonded kovar-and-glass window assemblies
4. Balanced construction might be beneficial• Kovar on top and bottom of glass to equalize shear stress on the
bonded glass
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 45
AF-45 GLASS SANDWICHED BETWEEN TWO KOVAR FRAMES
Each Frame’s Size: 1.30” x 1.35” with 0.080” wall thicknessGlass Size: 1.8” x 1.8” x 0.044”
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 46
SANDWICHED AF-45 GLASS (CONT.)
Initial Samples Held Vacuum To 10-7 Torr• 1 torr = 1 / 760 of an atmosphere at sea level
• 10-7 torr = 1.3 x 10-9 atmospheres•Process optimization would further improve the hermetic seal
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 47
OVARALL CONCLUSIONS FROM BONDING TRIALS
Proved the Feasibility of Diffusion Bonding a Metal Alloy (Kovar) Directly to Finished
Glass to Produce Hermetic Window Assemblies
• The bonding process does not affect the optical properties of the windows
•The bonding was performed below the softening temperature of the glass windows
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 48
OVERALL CONCLUSIONS FROM BONDING TRIALS (cont.)
The properties of the glass may be critical• Thermal, chemical
• Higher-temperature glass bonding may provide more atomic mobility
The kovar oxidation method and thickness may be critical
Wider frame widths may be desirable for better bonding
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 49
PLANS FOR ELECTRONICS PACKAGING APPLICATIONS
Identify other glasses for future tests Better average CTE match to kovar Chemical elements probably similar to those found in the glass-to-kovar
bond of Schott AF-45 Probably higher softening temperatures
Greater atomic mobility at bonding temperatures
Investigate using a different frame material than kovar Better average CTE match to glass for elevated bonding temperatures
Initiate tests of borofloat glasses with an identified frame material for wafer-level packaging (WLP) using diffusion bonding
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 50
SUMMARY• Proved feasibility of diffusion bonding metal to glass to
produce hermetic window assemblies• Diffusion-bonded glass-to-metal seals are inherently
stronger, more reliable and more hermetic than any other bonding method
• Diffusion bonding uses fewer process materials and steps than alternative bonding methods– Potential for lower/lowest cost
• Diffusion bonding may be used to join transparent materials other than glass to metals and alloys – Sapphire, quartz and other natural and synthetic materials
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 51
STATUS OF PATENTS
Approved Patents# FILING
DATEPATENT APPLICATION
NAMEPATENT
TYPESTATUS
1 22-Mar-2002 HERMETICALLY SEALED MICRO-DEVICE PACKAGE WITH WINDOW
Non-provisional
Issued on Sept 30, 2003
2 26-Apr-2002 HERMETICALLY SEALED MICRO-DEVICE PACKAGE USING COLD-GAS DYNAMIC SPRAY METAL DEPOSITION
Non-provisional, Continuation In-Part
Approved
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 52
STATUS OF PATENTS (cont.)
Patents Pending Review# FILING
DATEPATENT APPLICATION NAME PATENT TYPE
1 13-Mar-2003 HERMETICALLY SEALED MICRO-DEVICE PACKAGE WITH WINDOW
International Patent Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)
2 30-Jul-2003 HERMETICALLY SEALED MICRO-DEVICE PACKAGE WITH WINDOW
Continuation filing on 1st approved patent
3 15-Nov-2003 WAFER-LEVEL HERMETIC MICRO-DEVICE PACKAGES
Continuation-in- part
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 53
STATUS OF PATENTS (cont.)
Provisional Filings# FILING
DATEPATENT APPLICATION NAME
1 27-Jan-2003 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING HERMETIC WINDOW ASSEMBLIES
2 27-Jan-2003 METHOD FOR FABRICATING A FRAME ASSEMBLY3 14-Mar-
2003METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING HERMETIC INSULATED WINDOW ASSEMBLIES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER NON-BUILDING CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS
4 27-Mar-2003
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING LAMINATED, STRENGTH-REINFORCED SAFETY WINDOW ASSEMBLIES
IMAPS 2003 David Stark - Electronics Packaging Solutions, Inc. 54
FOR INQUIRIES AND/OR PRESENTATION COPIES, PLEASE CONTACT:
David StarkElectronics Packaging Solutions, Inc.
31252 Island DriveEvergreen, CO 80439 USA
Phone: (303) 674-1197E-mail: [email protected]
APPROVED AND PENDING PATENTS The information contained in this presentation has been disclosed in two approved, three pending and four provisional U.S. patents, in addition to an international patent application.