ilta 2011 integration of legal technology
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Integration of Legal Technology and Legal Services
George Rudoy, CEO, Integrated Legal Technology, LLC
Owen O’Connor, Managing Director, Cernam Online Evidence
![Page 2: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Disruptive Technologies
2
“Call me radical, but it seems to me that if we canenvisage a day when the average desk-top
machine has more processing power than all of humanity put together, then it might be time for
lawyers to rethink some of their working practicesand processes. This is not Google and hand-helde-mail plus a few bells and whistles. This is anunprecedented revolution in the power of the
tools available to man.”
Richard Susskind, The End of Lawyers?(2008), 64.
![Page 3: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Agenda
Legal Industry TrendsCreating New EfficienciesNew Technology Advancements
Cloud Provider Engagement - a Structured Approach
The Gap Between ProfessionsDon’t forget external users!
Discussion and Q&A
3
![Page 4: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Legal Industry Trends
![Page 5: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
“The overall marketplace for
legal services is fracturing. It's
unbundling and specialists are
emerging.”
“Firms have to decide where they
want to compete and how, and
what fits in their business model”“Trends come and go all the
time. This one I think is here to
stay.”
“General Counsel to Cut Legal Spending Up to 25%: Catastrophe or Opportunity?”
“The GC.…shifted his legal spending from 50 percent internal and 50 percent external to 70-30, thus reducing outside spending by 40 percent.”
Sources: ABA Journal; Legal Intelligencer; AmLaw Daily; HBR 2010 Law Department Survey
![Page 6: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Legal Industry TrendsFundamental changes
difficult to determine what will change and what will remain same
Sellers market shifting (partially) to buyers marketIncreased need to demonstrate client value
not about discounts, it’s about how firm delivers valueproductivity, efficiency, loyalty
Alternative fee structurespressure for it not coming from clients as much as is being written aboutnot so often flat fee as more predictable fees, caps, etc.
![Page 7: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Legal Industry Trends: 2010 Managing Partner Survey
Firm leaders believe current downturn will lead to more fundamental and lasting changes in the legal market.Within 3 years:
– 96% expect increase in use of alternative pricing models;– 81% expect increased investments to make practices more
efficient;– 55% expect increased use of non-lawyer project managers; – 43% expect an increase in outsourcing of routine legal
activities.
86% said they were innovatively changing the ways in which they engage in legal practice and conduct administrative functions.
Source: HBR LEIB Survey, Q2 2010
![Page 8: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Gradual Rebound or Temporary Anomaly?
The HBR Peer Monitor Index was up three points in Q4 2010 to 55 (PMI of 65 or higher indicates strong performance). Q4 saw a 1% increase in demand for law firm services in Q4 versus prior year – first growth in 2 yearsProductivity (hours / lawyer) increased slightly by 0.7%. Headcount remained neutral.Direct expenses down 4.5% but moderating; overhead fell 0.5%. For 2010, small rise in rates, plus staff reductions and tight cost controls, improved PPEP by 3-6 %. Demands for 2011 are below pre‐recession levels and can dip lower due to a possibly of a double-dip recession
Source: HBR Peer Monitor Index Q4 2010 Executive Report
![Page 9: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Bankruptcy
DEMAND GROWTH BY PRACTICE: ALL SEGMENTS
Gro
wth
Rate
(%
)
Litigation M&A L&E GeneralCorp
Tax CapitalMarkets
RealEstate
Period over Period Growth
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
IP-Lit
Proportion of Overall Market
2009 v 2008 2010 v 2009 Q4 ‘10 v Q4 ‘09
Practice Dynamics
Source: HBR Peer Monitor Index Q4 2010 Executive Report
![Page 10: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
A Shift In Client AttitudesClients are smarter consumers of legal services and tolerance for annual increases is gone
– In the past ten years, costs to U.S. companies grew 20% yet legal costs rose
76%
Diminishing perceived value of many types of legal mattersDesire for “better, faster, cheaper”Growing determination to bring the economic interests of the client and the law firm into better alignmentYet most corporations are not satisfied that current approach (to litigation) best meets their needs:
– 58% of companies prefer to litigate versus arbitration or mediation
– 40% of US companies expect to increase EDD spending in 2011
– Areas of greatest litigation concern include IP/Patents, Regulatory, Product Liability
Source: HBR research; Fulbright & Jaworski 7th Annual Litigation Trends Survey, 2010
![Page 11: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
New Practice Models
New PracticeModels
Evolving MarketForces
DisruptiveTechnologies
![Page 12: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Creating New Efficiencies
![Page 13: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Creating New EfficienciesTechnology & Support Structure, Information Management and Best Practices
Integration and Centralization of Legal Technology & Support functionsConsidering new ways of outsourcing (i.e. Cloud Technologies)Establishing clear business case process Key metrics and process for tracking performanceMobile workflows Categorization of efforts to drive organizational buy in and success: KM, LPM, CRM, Social CRM, Client Development, Business DevelopmentIntegration of contextually relevant content from external sourcesDeveloping primary information delivery mechanisms (i.e portals)
• adoption/utilization challenges• metrics to monitor usage
Integration of client data into attorney workflows/applications
![Page 14: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Creating New Efficiencies
Legal Project Management (a few questions to ask)
What does LPM actually mean?Who in your firms is responsible for creating project plans, setting milestones, budgets and deliverables?What tools do you use for LPM?Project management is a professional discipline in its own right, do you feel your attorneys have the ability to become effective project managers?
• Using certified PMPs• Training programs
What are the key ways LPM have helped create organizational efficiencies?
![Page 15: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Creating New Efficiencies
AFAs (more questions)What are your longer range plans, and what are you looking to accomplish this year?What is working well, and where do you see the challenges?How prevalent are AFAs in your firms?How do you establish pricing for AFAs and what data do you use to evaluate?What mechanisms do you use to monitor & ensure profitability in an AFA arrangement?
![Page 16: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Creating New Efficiencies
Cross Selling & Business Development
What are the untapped or not easily accessed sources of information that could be used for business development? What technologies are being utilized to make this information more easily accessible?What are attorneys asking for now that is not yet available to them?Has anyone yet begun to merge firm data with web-based social network data to help attorneys?
![Page 17: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
New Technology Advancements
![Page 18: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Information management, litigation and discovery needs often become more diverse as client and case size increases
Firms Are Creating Strategic Partnerships That Meet the Diverse Needs of Their Clients
Many “Do it Yourself” and Outsourced
Solutions Options Are Available
Based on Clients’ Needs
![Page 19: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
70% of U.S. attorneys in private practice work in law firms with ten or fewer attorneys
Ten or less
2000 statistics from ABA: See, http://www.hg.org/marketing-us-market.html
Cloud and Software as a Service (SaaS) technology brings robust, modern technology all lawyers and clients—not just the big ones
Cloud Technologies
![Page 20: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Emerging “In-House” Solutions:•Software-as-a-Service (Saas)•Platform-as-a-Service (Paas)•Infrastructure-as-a-Service (Iaas)
Advantages:•No up front investment•Pay only when you use•Reduction in overhead (staff and infrastructure) Emerging “Outsourced” Solutions:
•Discovery Repositories•Early Data Assessment Consulting•Computer-Aided Review
Advantages:•Ability to scale quickly•Diverse options•Partner knowledge and experience
Cloud Technologies
![Page 21: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
AmLaw Tech Survey 2010
80% of law firm respondents reported using cloud computing services
29% said it lowers costs
60% use cloud-based services for e-discovery or litigation support features
5% use the cloud for document management, while 6% utilize cloud computing for storage purposes
39% are worried about security
![Page 22: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Cloud Security in 60 Seconds
“We have a SAS70 that proves we’re secure”Who has a SAS70? (Amazon Web Services? Your server hosting provider? A completely unrelated datacenter?)What exactly does it cover?
“Your data is encrypted, we use 128-bit SSL security / banking-grade security”
Must differentiate encryption in transit from encryption at restFew providers have meaningful at-rest encryption
![Page 23: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Key Cloud Security Questions
If our data is encrypted, can your staff access the contents of our data?If we view the audit logs for your service, will they show access by your support staff?Outside of your staff, who else can access data (downstream providers, contractors)?What are your dependencies on other cloud service providers, specifically Amazon?How are your security features tested?
![Page 24: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Cloud Provider Engagement - A Structured Approach
![Page 25: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Managing Cloud Providers
Why would anyone run a project just to select a cloud service provider?
“There is only one vendor in the area, we just need to negotiate and contract with them”“This is a hosted cloud service, IT doesn’t need to deploy anything so it’s not an IT project”“This is just a pilot adoption, we don’t want to bloat the effort with project management”“The dollars involved mean this isn’t a project”
![Page 26: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The $30 per month trap
“5 users at $30 each is pocket change, we’ll just use a purchasing card or expense it”
$16k starts to look more like a project.. and you’re storing what data in this service?
Month Users Total Monthly Cost Yearly Cost
1 5 $150
3 8 $240
6 14 $420
9 25 $750
12 44 $1,320 $15,840
![Page 27: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Structured Cloud Engagement
Identify project stakeholdersIdentify outline requirementsResearch market players (never assume only one provider exists)Document detailed requirementsAssess specific providers (potential RFI/RFP)Validate choice of preferred provider
Due diligence, integration planning, security
Negotiate, contract, integrate / deploy
![Page 28: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The Emerging IT PM Hero
Cloud provider engagement shows the range of skills needed in an IT project manager
Market awareness & researchTechnical writingVendor assessmentFinancial Negotiation
Managing cloud providers could become a full-time role based on current trends
![Page 29: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The Gap Between Professions
![Page 30: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Who are the stakeholders?
IT
COMPLIANCE
COUNSEL
LEGAL
RECORDS MANAGEMENT
PROJECT MANAGER
![Page 31: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
What do the Stakeholders Care About?
IT• Storage• Archive• Accessibility•Security
COMPLIANCE• Risk• Regulations
VENDORS• The Sale
COUNSEL• Cost strategies• Collect• Review• Risks• Case strategy• Mine from many sources• Greater responsibilities• Holds
CUSTODIANS/USERS
• Doing their job• Hassle-free
LEGAL•Manage Cost, Risk & Strategy•Contract
RECORDS• Volume• Records Retention• Preservation
![Page 32: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Alignment Issues
Fit
Effort
Value
Maintenance
Systems Dept. Business
Divergent perspectives on implementing processes
Within technical infrastructure
Within process landscape
Within project scope/need
Legal/Outside Counsel
Increases(new process)
Increases/Decreases(process improvement)
Increases(response to new burden)
Within system portfolio
Profit, efficiency, savings, etc. Reduced Risk
Coordination, Burden
? ??
![Page 33: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Partner26%
General Counsel9%
IT4%
Staff Attorney4%
Litigation Support53%
Paralegal4%
Who handles to intersection of law and technology – law firm perspective
![Page 34: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
General Counsel16%
IT28%
Staff Attorney44%
Partner4%
Litigation Support53%
Paralegal4%
Who handles to intersection of law and technology – corporate perspective
![Page 35: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Budgeting Gaps
Depends on the company’s perspective.Proactive approach – typically involves DRP planning along with a sizeable software purchase – e-archival, doc management, etc.Usually, comes from the IT Dept. budget.Reactive approach – typically involves responding to a threatened/filed litigation by way of a sizeable services purchase.Usually, comes from the Legal Dept. budget.
![Page 36: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Nomenclature Gaps
ArchiveFiles and FoldersBackup
![Page 37: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Scheduling Gap
Scheduling Gaps
![Page 38: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Don’t forget external users!
![Page 39: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Clients are IT users too
Must clients experience law firm tech in some form
Portal and collaboration systemsDocument review platformsBulk file transfer toolsFirm websitesVoice & video conferencingBilling systemsAttorney access to client-hosted systems (portals etc)Secure email systems
![Page 40: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Poor Client Experiences
Multiple equivalent systemse.g., multiple Sharepoint portals or file sharing sitesDifferent platforms or versions across different cases, between different offices or practice areasSeparate passwords etc within a single project or firm
Poor platforms / poor experience for core servicesDocument sharing, voice conferencing, electronic billing, secure email services
Inconsistency and initial confusion on e-discovery providers, review platforms and methodologies
![Page 41: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Ideal Client Experience
Single client web portal, across all locations (globally) all and practice groupsClient web portal linked from website front pageTeam details, electronic billing, file transfer and basic collaboration provided via core portalAll secondary portals, web applications, third-party web services etc linked from core portalSingle set of authentication credentials with self-service password reset and direct helpdesk contactApplications updated/retired in a controlled manner
![Page 42: ILTA 2011 Integration Of Legal Technology](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022060115/557c9217d8b42a6c788b4d47/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Integration of Legal Technology and Legal Services
George Rudoy, CEO, Integrated Legal Technology, LLCP: +1 347 208 2740
[email protected]://www.linkedin.com/in/grudoy
Owen O’Connor, Managing Director, Cernam Online Evidence
P: +353 1 716 3793
http://www.linkedin.com/in/owenoconnor
Twitter: @CernamOwen