8/6/2019 Ignoring the Reality of Jihad at Our Peril - By Frank Gaffney

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ignoring-the-reality-of-jihad-at-our-peril-by-frank-gaffney 1/1

Ignoring the Reality of Jihad at Our Peril

 Published on Faith Freedom International (http://faithfreedom.org)

Home > Ignoring the Reality of Jihad at Our Peril

Ignoring the Reality of Jihad at Our Peril

By Frank Gaffney

Created 01/19/2010 - 21:10

Frank Gaffney, Jr.

 

Most sentient Americans had one question in the wake of the massacre at Fort Hood last November: How

on earth could the Army have allowed to remain in its ranks a soldier known to espouse the supremacist,

seditious ideology that justifies murderous jihad?

 

Now, thanks to a report submitted last Friday by an official inquiry, we have the answer. Incredibly,

though, that answer is not to be found within the 86-page document issued by the "Department of Defense Independent Review Related to Fort Hood [1]." Rather, it is evident from what the report does not say.

 

Like its name, the independent review co-chaired by former Clinton Army Secretary Togo West and

former Chief of Naval Operations Vern Clark elides the central fact: The murder of 12 servicemen and

women and one civilian at Fort Hood, Texas on November 5, 2009 was indeed an act of jihad, or Islamic

"holy war."

 

Incredibly, there is exactly one reference to the word "Islam" or its derivatives in the entire report. It is

only to be found in a footnote, which cites a publication whose title is "Countering Violent Islamic 

Extremism [2]."

 

No mention is made at all of "jihad" or "Shariah," the ideology that, according to authoritative Islam,

requires its adherents to engage in holy war. Neither, for that matter, are the following terms ever used:

"Muslim," "Muslim Brotherhood," "Salafi," "al Qaeda" or "enemy." Even the administration’s favored

euphemism, "violent extremism" is not employed, ever.

 

Instead of even alluding to the wellspring of Maj. Hasan's antipathy towards this country and his

comrades, the review goes to absurd lengths to leave the obvious unsaid. It tells us that "signs" of the

"alleged perpetrator's" mindset, without telling us what the signs were. It suggests a problem with

"officership standards," again without making clear how those standards should be changed.

 

The review concludes with a recommendation for close monitoring of what it calls "indicators of potential

violence," as though that potential is something that can be reliably ascertained, let alone precluded,

without acknowledging the underlying cause. Instead, we are told that what is needed is a "Secretary of 

Defense Initiative on Indicators of Violence" or even more absurdly, a "Defense Committee on

Recognition of the Indications of Violence."

 

These august institutions would, if Messrs. West and Clark have their way, be tasked to: "gather, analyze

and interpret data useful in identifying indicators of potential for violent action and create a

comprehensive and usable catalogue of those indicators with constant updates."

 

Worse yet, they envision having these bodies "composed of acknowledged experts drawn from inside and

outside the Department, such as academia, research institutes, business, former public service and the

like." As things stand now, among those used for this purpose would almost certainly be operatives of 

various Muslim Brotherhood front organizations. Never mind that the U.S. government itself has

demonstrated in court that the Brotherhood has as its mission "the destruction of Western civilization

from within."

 

Such adherents to Shariah have contributed materially to our present fix with their "sensitivity training" of 

government personnel and their exclusive and manipulative facilitation of official "Muslim outreach"

programs. The West-Clark review is a prime example of the sort of systematic dumbing-down theBrothers have achieved of the military's "situational awareness" - and that of the American government

more generally – about the threat posed by them and their fellow stealth jihadists.

 

Tragically, at a moment when we urgently need clarity about that threat, not more dissembling, we have

gotten pap, not answers. The West-Clark review has properly been scathingly criticized by, among others,

retired Army Lt. Col. Ralph Peters as evidence of a far-larger crisis. In his New York Post column on

Saturday, Peters wrote: "This report's spinelessness is itself an indictment of our military's failed moral

and ethical leadership."

 

The problem, however, is not simply one of failed leadership that feels compelled to defer to "political

correctness." Properly understood, the West-Clark review and the institutional mindset it reflects really

amount, instead, to collective acts of submission – the literal meaning of the word "Islam" and what its

Shariah ideology requires of everyone, adherents and non-adherents alike.

 

If we are to prevent such an unacceptable outcome and defeat those seeking to impose it – or even just to

reduce the danger of further, needless loss of American lives, we must say the unsayable: Adherents to the

ideology of Shariah are our enemies, just as were the Nazis, the fascists and communists. Like these other

ideologues, their unalterable objective is the destruction of our Constitution, democratic political system

and freedom-loving country. Whether they seek these ends through overtly terrifying violence or through

stealthy jihad, adherents to Shariah have no place in our military, in our government or, for that matter, in

our mosques.

 

Those who act on these necessary precepts in the armed forces, in the intelligence and law enforcement

communities, in other government agencies or among the public at large must know what will be said of 

them from here on out: Far from being branded as "racists," "bigots," "Islamophobes" or simply

"politically incorrect," their countrymen will give them the names they will have earned – "patriots" and

"heroes."

 

FamilySecurityMatters.org [3] Contributor Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is president of the Center for Security

Policy and a columnist for The Washington [4] Times.

What brought you here?:

How on earth could the Army have allowed to remain in its ranks a soldier known to espouse the seditious

ideology that justifies murderous jihad? Tragically, we have gotten pap, not answers.

q  Jihad & Terrorism

q  Politics

q  Fort Hood

q  New York Post

q  The Washington Times

q  al-Qaeda

q  American government

q  army

q  chief 

q  columnist

q  Department of Defense

q  Frank Gaffney , Jr.

q  Frank J. Gaffney Jr.

q  Hasan

q  Lt. Col.

q  New York Post

q  Person Career

q  president

q  Ralph Peters

q  secretary

q  secretary of defense

q  Texas

q  The Washington Times

q  The West-Clark review

Faith Freedom International is about : Ex-muslims, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Quran, Mohammad,

Apostasy, Jihad and Terrorism, Islamocritics, Islam and its effects on Muslims, Ali Sina, Mohammad's

Pedophilia,Ex Muslim testimonials, Prophet Muhammad's wives, Quranic Contradictions, Anti Islamic

site, Apostates of Islam, Ex-muslim free thinker,Anti Islamic Cartoons, Ex muslims site, Against Islamic

teachings, Debates with Ayatollah,Ghamidi and invitations to Zakir Naik (of IRF), Islam and Science,

Islam and wormen, Islam Online Resource.

© 2009 Faith Freedom International •

Syndicate

 

Source URL: http://faithfreedom.org/islam/ignoring-reality-jihad-our-peril

Links: [1] http://www.army.mil/-news/2010/01/15/33006-protecting-the-force-lessons-learned-from-fort-hood/ 

[2] http://www.fbi.gov/publications/leb/2007/dec07leb.pdf 

[3] http://www.fsmarchives.org/ 

[4] http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.4672/pub_detail.asp

http://faithfreedom.org/print/758119.01.2010 19:09:44