ifpri international food policy research institute monitoring caadp implementation melissa lambert,...
TRANSCRIPT
IFPRI
IFPRI
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Monitoring CAADP Implementation
Melissa Lambert, Research Analyst, IFPRI
Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
Partnership to Cut Hunger and Poverty in Africa 3rd Annual Forum: “Getting Down to Business: Scaling Up Agricultural Development in Africa”
March 1, 2011
IFPRI
Outline
ReSAKSS CAADP M&E Framework
» Rationale and key questions» Results
Next steps for CAADP M&E and ReSAKSS
IFPRI
Organization of ReSAKSSOne Africa-wide and three
Regional nodesCountry SAKSS nodes
Established: Rwanda and Uganda
Countries advanced in process:» SA: Zambia (under
discussion)» WA: Ghana, Liberia, Mali,
Senegal, Sierra Leone, and Niger, Nigeria, Togo
» ECA: DRC, Malawi, Mozambique
Eastern and Central Africa
at ILRI in Nairobi – works with COMESA
Southern Africa at IWMI in Pretoria – works with SADC
West Africa at IITA in Ibadan –
works with ECOWAS
Africa Wide at IFPRI in DC– coordinates across
regional nodes
IFPRI
CAADP M&E FRAMEWORK
IFPRI
Idea behind M&E framework
Page 5
Greater/better distributedpoverty reduction & food and
nutrition security outcomes
Accelerated agricultural growth & Greater market access
More enabling policies &Greater/more efficient allocation of
agricultural investments
Global levelCommitments
Africa-wide levelDeclarations
Decisions
Regional levelEarly actions
8
7
6
1
2
3
5
P 4
P 3P 2
4
P 1P 1
National levelRoundtable
Processes
Other factors
Other factors
Other factors
More effective
tracking
reporting
analysis
IFPRI
Page 6
Key questions for M&E Delivering on commitments
» Have commitments and targets been met so far?
Effectiveness of interventions (policies, investments, etc.)» How effective have different types of interventions been in any achievements
realized so far? What factors have shaped the achievements?
Consistency with initial targets» What are the projected impacts if interventions proceed as planned?» Are the projected impacts compatible with the CAADP targets?» If not, what adjustments are needed to get it on track?
Exploring better interventions» Could greater or better distributed impacts be obtained by reconfiguring the
interventions?» What are the different interventions that can lead to these outcomes?
IFPRI
Main Reports and Dissemination
Website (www.resakss.org)Newsletter (
www.resakss.wordpress.com)
Annual Report and Briefs in time for CAADP PP meeting National, regional and continental levels
ReSAKSS Website and Online Newsletter to view and download trends, data, charts, supporting research publications, etc.
IFPRI
2010 CONTINENTAL ATORCurrent results…
IFPRI
1. Government appoints Focal Point(s)
2. REC and Government launch
process
3. Country Steering and Technical Committee
4. Cabinet Memo and Endorsement
5. Stocktaking, Growth, Invest.
Analysis
6. Drafting of Country CAADP Compact
7. Roundtable Signing of Compact
8. Elaboration of detailed investment
plans
9. Post compact review meeting and validation
of investment plans
10. Agreement on financing plan,
financing instruments, and annual review
mechanism
11. Operational design and other technical
studies and assessment for program execution
12. Execution of new investment programs
13. First annual review meeting
14. Second annual review meeting
The National CAADP Roundtable Process & Country StatusCameroon, Chad,
Egypt, Eritrea, Gabon, Libya
Mauritius, Mozambique
COMESA, Zimbabwe
Cote d’Ivoire, Guinea Bissau,
Zambia
Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, ECOWAS, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Nigeria, Senegal,
Tanzania, Uganda
Comoros, Djibouti, DRC, Madagascar, Seychelles, Sudan
† Countries have accessed GAFSP funding.
Ethiopia†, Niger†, Rwanda†, Sierra Leone†, Togo†
Burundi, Swaziland
39 countries have started
CAADP process
24 countries &1 region
have signed compacts
5 countries have received funding
and are about to begin implementation
IFPRI
Africa SSA CA EA NA SA WA0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Agriculture GDP growth (%)
90-95 95-03 2003 03-09
Per
cent
Tracking CAADP targets
Africa SSA CA EA NA SA WA0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Agriculture expenditure share in total expenditures
90-95 95-03 2003 03-09
Per
cent
10% Target
•Declines in average levels across most regions, except in EA and WA
• Only EA and WA currently meeting 10% target
• No regions reaching an averageannual agGDP growth rateof 6% target in recent periods
•Some regions – SSA, central,eastern, southern – have seen an upward trend in growth since 2003
6% Target
IFPRI
Poverty and hunger (MDG1)
Countries on track for halving poverty by 2015
Countries on track for halving hunger by 2015Countries on track
for achieving MDG1
Burkina FasoCameroon**
Cape Verde**,***Central African Rep.**
EthiopiaGuinea*,**
KenyaLesothoMalawi
MaliMorocco*Senegal
Swaziland**,***Uganda*
EA RegionLI-2
Algeria***Angola**,***
Benin*,**Botswana**,***
BurundiEquatorial Guinea**,***
Gambia, The**Guinea Bissau**Mozambique**Namibia**,***
Sao Tome & Principe**,***Tunisia
Egypt*,**Ghana**
Mauritania**
NA Region*,**
Yet northern Africaonly region to
possibly meet both
14 on track for halving poverty
12 on track for halving hunger
Majority of thesecountries are in WestAfrica (5 for poverty,
and 4 for hunger)
IFPRI
Outlook for M&E and ReSAKSS Present results (2010 continental and regional reports)
at next CAADP PP, 23-25 March 2011 in Yaoundé, Cameroon
Focus on establishing country SAKSS nodes for M&E of investment plans
2011 M&E to focus on agricultural productivity» Why there has not been widespread technical change in Africa?» Review any lessons associated with the efficiency gains in
agricultural production achieved in different parts of Africa
IFPRI
THANK YOU!