IFAD Reform towards a better development effectiveness

How can we all do better?

Mohamed TounessiBamba Zoumana

Virginia CameroonRetreat 4-5 November 09

Ouaguadougou BF

Why reforming IFAD?

• 6th Replenishment, 2002: members requested Independent External Evaluation of IFAD

• In 2005, the Independent External Evaluation (IEE) measured IFAD’s performance in terms of relevance, efficiency and effectiveness, and made recommendations. IEE report found:

- IFAD’s low performance: “only a little over half of the sampled projects showed a satisfactory overall impact on poverty”

- To meet challenges, deep, far-reaching changes needed.

How IFAD was reformed?

• IFAD’s Action Plan to improve its development effectiveness (2006-2009) is the response to the IEE recommendations in terms of:

- Furthering the program approach to ensure economies of scale, reduction of program operating costs, better impact on poverty reduction, expanding on pro poor policy dialogue, ensure effective strategic partnership in view of better synergy and complementarity

- enhancing program quality, performance and impact- improving capacity to innovate and manage the knowledge gained

What are the reform goal and targets?

• Goal to increase IFAD’s development effectiveness, efficiency and relevance in helping its member countries reduce rural poverty.

• By 2009,- RELEVANCE: 100% congruence with country development

objectives, strategies and priorities- EFFECTIVENESS: 80% or more of IFAD projects will achieve their

development objectives- EFFICIENCY: 60% or more of IFAD projects will have a high or

substantial level of efficiency

What are the key reforms?

• Strategic Framework 2007-2010: basis for all reform efforts and guidance including:

• Management for Development Results - focus on strategic priorities, and monitoring and assessing results.

• Innovation and Knowledge Management Strategies• New Operating Model:

- Working more closely with our country partners and within their poverty reduction strategies

- New Program design guidelines and processes for quality enhancement at entry (QE)

- New arms-length quality assurance system (QA) - Direct Supervision and loan administration- Enhanced country presence to contribute to the Paris/Accra

agenda on Aid Effectiveness (Burkina Faso included in the first phase)

Organizational effectiveness:

Financial, HR management and alignment

Operational effectiveness:

Improving country programmes and projects

Strategic objectives:

Action Plan targets;

Strategic Framework 2007-2010

Measurement, managing and reporting

Areas of reform

Report on IFAD’s

DevelopmentEffectiveness

Level 2: IFAD contribution to development

outcomes

Level 3: Progress in enhancing

IFAD’s operational effectiveness

Level 4: Progress in improving IFAD’s

organizational effectiveness

Level 1: Country progress in key development

outcomes

Management for Development Results coherent framework

Corporate Management Results (CMRs): Country-level results are critical

• CMR 1: Better Country Programme Management

• CMR 2: Better Program Design (loans and grants)

• CMR 3: Better Implementation Support

• CMR 4. Improved Resource Mobilisation and Management

• CMR 5. Improved Human Resource Management

• CMR 6. Improved Risk Management

• CMR 7. Improved Administrative Efficiency

• CMR 8: Strengthened International Advocacy’

The New Operating Model

Key features of the New Quality-based Program Design (Virginia Cameroon)

Country Programme Teams (CPMT): A Collaborative Tool to Operationalise the Paris/Accra Declaration

Composition- Ownership: Key Government & partner stakeholders

from the host country including core project management

- Technical: Staff in key thematic areas of the project & co-opted members

- Fiduciary: Legal and Financial personnel from IFAD and/or CI

- Peers: Other CPMs (including from other divisions) with relevant expertise, Regional Economists, Field Presence, Specialists and personnel from other rural development agencies/donors in host country

CPMT Role

• The end result is the Quality of Design and Implementation Proposals (internal quality enhancement)

• Collective responsibility and accountability• Outputs

• Parameters of a new project; • Main areas of investigation and analysis

required• Design Plan

• Project development timeline and budget• “Life File” development & management• CPMT to present the project in fora & committees

Knowledge Sharing (Bamba)

• Knowledge for IFAD is development practice

• Rationale: to learn systematically and collectively through own programs, from the experience of partners, especially the rural poor people and their organizations

• Objective: to “improve knowledge sharing and learning and translate these into, better programs and better implementation”

12

Strengthening knowledge sharing and learning processes at country level

• Within country program cycle to improve development effectiveness:- Mainstreamed KM through R-B COSOP - M&E as a learning tool- Implementation support: supervision, MTR, learning - Country presence to foster knowledge sharing and

learning- In-country policy dialogue is systematically informed by

programme experience• Initiatives to value and stimulate local knowledge• Local knowledge with high potential to be scaled up

13

Strengthening knowledge sharing and learning networks and processes

• Strengthening a few thematic networks (e.g. Rural finance, cassava, rice, CDD…)

• Further expand FIDAfrique to cover Sub-saharan Africa

• Expand knowledge services: project webpages, facilitating learning initiatives (workshops, e-conf.)…

• Stronger linkages with Rural Poverty Portal

14