ieg.worldbank.orgieg.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/data/reports/gppp_annex.pdf · abbreviations...
TRANSCRIPT
The World Bank’s Approach to Global Programs: An Independent Evaluation Phase 1 Annexes
August 1, 2002 Operations Evaluation Department
Document of the World Bank
Abbreviations and Acronyms AAA Analytical and advisory activities AIDS Acquired immune deficiency syndrome APL Adaptable Program Loan BB World Bank’s administrative budget CAS Country assistance strategy (World Bank) CGIAR Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research CGAP Consultative Group to Assist the Poorest (a microfinance program) CODE Committee on Development Effectiveness (World Bank) CTF Consultant Trust Fund DALY Disability-adjusted life year DEC Development Economics Vice-Presidency (World Bank) DGF Development Grant Facility (World Bank) ESMAP Energy Sector Management Assistance Program ESSD Environmentally & Socially Sustainable Development Network (World Bank) FIAS Foreign Investment Advisory Service FRM Resource Mobilization Department (World Bank) FSAP Financial Sector Assessment Program FSE Financial Sector Network (World Bank) FY Fiscal year GAVI Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization GCGF Global Corporative Governance Forum GDLN Global Development Learning Network GDN Global Development Network GEF Global Environment Facility GFHR Global Forum for Health Research GKP Global Knowledge Partnership GMI Global Micronutrient Initiative GPG Global Public Goods Fund GPPPs Global public policies and programs GWP Global Water Partnership HDN Human Development Network (World Bank) HIPC Highly-indebted poor country HIV Human immunodeficiency virus HRP Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human
Reproduction IAD Internal Audit Department IDA International Development Association IDF Institutional Development Fund IFC International Finance Corporation IMF International Monetary Fund InfoDev Information for Development Program IPR Intellectual property right ISG Information Solutions Group LIL Learning and Innovation Loan MD Managing Director MDGs Millennium Development Goals MMV Medicines for Malaria Venture NGO Nongovernmental organization
ODA Official development assistance OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OED Operations Evaluation Department (World Bank) OP Operational Policy OPCS Operational Policy and Country Services PACT Partnerships for Capacity in Africa PAD Project Appraisal Document PATS Partnership Approval and Tracking System PCD Project Concept Document PPIAF Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility PREM Poverty Reduction & Economic Management Network (World Bank) PRH Population and Reproductive Health Capacity Building Program PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper PSI Private Sector Development & Infrastructure Network (World Bank) QALY Quality-adjusted life year SDG Solar Development Group SPAAR Special Program for African Agricultural Research SRM Strategy and Resource Management Vice-Presidency SSP Sector Strategy Paper (World Bank) TB Tuberculosis TDR Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases TF Trust funds administered by the World Bank TFO Trust Funds Operations Department TRIPS Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (WTO) UNAIDS Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund VP Vice-Presidency WBI World Bank Institute WCD World Commission on Dams WDR World Development Report (World Bank) WHO World Health Organization WorLD World Links For Development Program WTO World Trade Organization WWF World-Wide Fund for Nature/World Wildlife Fund
Director-General, Operations Evaluation : Mr. Robert Picciotto Director, Operations Evaluation Department : Mr. Gregory Ingram Task Manager : Ms. Uma Lele
i
Table of Contents
Annex A. The Bank’s Policy and Institutional Framework for Managing Global and Regional Partnerships .........................................................................................1
Annex B. Defining Global Public Goods .....................................................................................7
Annex C. Stages in the Policy Cycle of a Global Program ......................................................10
Annex D. Inventory of 70 Global Programs..............................................................................12
Annex E. Global Programs for in-Depth Case Studies ............................................................22
Annex F. Oversight and Management of Global Programs ....................................................24
Annex G. Funding of Global Programs......................................................................................30
Annex H. Objectives, Activities, Outputs, Outcomes, and Exit Strategies of Global Programs................................................................................................................32
Annex I. Classification of Global Programs..............................................................................57
Annex J. Beneficiaries and Benefits of Global Programs .........................................................64
Annex K. Risk Assessment and Approval Process for Private Sector Partnerships.............81
Annex L. DGF Governance and Management Framework .....................................................82
Annex M. Trust Fund Governance and Management Framework .........................................86
Annex N. The GPG Fund.............................................................................................................92
Annex O. Recent and Scheduled Evaluations of Global Programs ........................................94
Annex P. Likely Effect of Three Management Options on Global Program Issues...............98
Annex Q. DGF Data on Program Approvals and Exits ............................................................99
Annex R. Summary Statistics from Questionnaire Administered to Task Managers of Global Programs..............................................................................................................101
Annex S. Summary Statistics from Questionnaire Administered to Task Managers of Bank’s Lending Operations............................................................................................104
Annex T. Survey Questionnaire with Respect to the GPG Fund Administered to Task Managers of the Bank’s Lending Operations......................................................110
1 Annex A
Annex A. The Bank’s Policy and Institutional Framework for Managing Global and Regional Partnerships The Bank has made substantial progress in establishing an institutional framework for managing global programs. The key events during the last four years are presented in Box A.1.
1. Policy Framework for Overall Management of Partnerships
The Board presentation of January 30, 2001, summarizes the current policy and institutional framework for managing Bank involvement in global programs. Generally speaking:
• Executive Board: Endorses policy direction and strategy.
• Managing Directors (MDs): Provide strategic direction and oversight. – Effective November 2000, all major new partnerships have to be approved by MDs,
in accordance with six criteria.
• Vice-Presidents (VPs): Exercise operational responsibility. – Prepare new programs, oversee ongoing programs, and manage in-house programs – Initiate, approve, and manage trust fund agreements. – Review annually all partnership programs based on a clearly defined partnership
strategy. – Decide to maintain or to exit from existing programs.
August 1997 The establishment of the Development Grant Facility (DGF) to place all global and regional programs that receive World Bank grant funding under a single management umbrella.
May 1999 The creation of the Partnership Council, chaired by an MD and composed of VPs particularly active in partnerships, as an advisory body to support a more proactive management of partnerships and to provide a forum for Bankwide discussion and learning.
April 28, 2000 Two presentations to the Board, on Partnership Oversight and Selectivity and Addressing Global Dimensions in Development to initiate a Bankwide strategy for partnerships and global programs.
September 25, 2000
A communiqué of the Development Committee Ministers establishing a set of four criteria to guide the Bank’s involvement in global and regional programs and five institutional priority areas for Bank involvement.
November 6, 2000
A memorandum from Sven Sandstrom to the Bank’s VPs formalizing a set of six criteria for engaging in partnerships and establishing that MDs would review all major new partnerships at the conceptual stage.
January 30, 2001
The presentation to the Board of a consolidated Framework for Managing Global Programs and Partnerships.
March 2001 The creation of the Management Committee comprising the President and the MDs, to address issues of priority and strategy for global programs and partnerships.
March 2001 The identification of five global public goods priorities and five corporate advocacy priorities for the Bank in the Strategic Directions paper for FY02-04.
April 2001 The establishment of the Global Public Goods (GPG) Fund of $7.5 million for FY02 to provide additional incentives for work, primarily at the regional and country levels, on the five GPG priority areas defined in the Strategic Directions Paper.
August 2001 The formalization by the PSI Network of a risk assessment and approval process for private sector partnerships.
November 20, 2001
The presentation to the Board of a new framework for improved management and effectiveness of World Bank–administered trust funds.
December 2001 Two memoranda from Jeffrey Goldstein and Motoo Kusakabe, launching a new Partnership Approval and
Box A.1. The Bank’s Institutional Framework for Managing Global Programs: Key Events since 1997
Tracking System (PATS), which integrates several partnership-related processes into one business process: (1) an initiating concept note for seeking MD approval for new global and regional partnerships, (2) the DGF application process, (3) the initiating brief for trust funds, and (4) the risk assessment and approval process for private sector partnerships.
Annex A 2
2. Definition of a Partnership
A “partnership” is a program or arrangement wherein: • The Bank formally commits resources (financial, technical, personnel, or reputation)
along with other partners toward a common objective. • The activity is one that the Bank would not or could not do alone. • The activity is at the regional, global, or institutional level (not country program). • The partners share the outcomes and the risks (i.e., this is not a contractor relationship).1
The policy and institutional framework for managing global and regional partnerships only applies to the first two of the three types of partnerships mentioned in the Board presentation of January 30, 2001.2
• Global or thematic programs • Institutional partnerships • Operational partnerships at the country level.
3. Development Committee Criteria for the Bank’s Involvement in Global (and Regional)
Programs
In their communiqué issued on September 25, 2000, the Development Committee Ministers endorsed a set of four criteria to guide the Bank’s involvement in global and regional programs and five institutional priority areas for Bank involvement.
The four criteria are: • A clear value added to the Bank’s development objectives • The need for Bank action to catalyze other resources and partnerships • A significant comparative advantage for the Bank • An emerging international consensus that global action is required.
The five institutional priority areas are: • Promoting improved economic governance • Trade integration • Preventing the spread of communicable diseases • Protecting the global environmental commons • Information and knowledge about development.
4. Global Public Goods and Corporate Advocacy Priorities
In the Strategic Directions paper for FY02-04, the Bank’s Management identified five global public goods priorities (based upon the five institutional priority areas) and five corporate advocacy priorities.
The five global public goods priorities are: • Communicable diseases • Environmental commons • Information and knowledge • Trade and integration
1. Partnership Approval and Tracking System, launched December 14, 2001.
2. “A Framework for Managing Global Programs and Partnerships,” page 7.
3 Annex A
• International financial architecture.
The corporate advocacy priorities are: • Empowerment, security, and social inclusion • Investment climate • Public sector governance • Education • Health.
5. Millennium Development Goals
In a news release, dated September 19, 2001, the World Bank announced that it was joining the United Nations as a full partner in implementing the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which aim to improve the lives of the world’s poor. The eight MDGs are:
• To eradicate extreme poverty and hunger • To achieve universal primary education • To promote gender equality and empower women • To reduce child mortality • To improve maternal health • To combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases • To ensure environmental sustainability • To develop a global partnership for development.
6. Approval Criteria for New Partnerships
In a Board presentation on April 28, 2000, and an internal memorandum, the Bank’s management established six approval criteria for engaging in partnerships:
• A clear linkage to the Bank’s core institutional objectives and, above all, to the Bank’s country operational work
• A strong case for Bank participation based on comparative advantage • A clear assessment of the financial and reputational risks to the Bank and how these will
be managed • A thorough analysis of the expected level of Bank resources required, both money and
time, as well as the contribution of other partners • A clear delineation of how the new commitment will be implemented, managed, and
assessed • The clear plan for communicating with and involving key stakeholders, and for informing
and consulting the Eds.
Annex A 4
7. Approval Process for New Partnerships
Since the Board presentation on April 28, 2000, but effectively since the internal memorandum from Sven Sandstrom to all Vice-Presidents, dated November 6, 2000, VPs have been required to refer all major new partnerships for approval to their respective MDs at the early concept stage—that is, before the Bank makes a firm commitment to partners.3
VPs retain the discretion not to refer new partnerships to MDs for approval where there is minimal involvement of the Bank’s resources or reputation, but they are required to do so in three specific cases:
• All DGF applications for new programs • All new global and regional trust funds • All new private sector partnerships.
Before approving new programs, MDs may consult with their colleagues on the Management Committee or seek advice from the Partnership Council. After MD approval, the VPU is authorized to secure and sign agreements with other partners and to mobilize the relevant resources (World Bank’s administrative budget, DGF, Trust Funds, in-kind contributions, etc.).
The Bank’s management is not required to seek approval for new partnerships from the Executive Board except in the following cases:
• Where the Bank proposes to make a specific financial contribution (such as grants from the DGF)
• Where the President proposes to serve as a director of an entity related to the partnership (such as for the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund)
• Where the Bank proposes to provide exceptional grants from net income (such as for the East Timor and Kosovo Trust Funds)
• Where the Bank proposes to enter into a cooperation agreement with another international organization, beyond a temporary or administrative nature.
The launching of the new Partnership Approval and Tracking System (PATS) in December 2001 was intended to integrate several partnership related processes into one business process—(1) the initiating concept note for seeking MD approval, (2) the DGF application process, (3) the initiating brief for trust funds, and (4) the risk assessment and approval process for private sector partnerships—and to provide a central depository of accurate and up-to-date information on the Bank’s global and regional partnerships.
8. The Management Committee
In an internal memorandum the Bank established a Management Committee, consisting of the MDs and himself, to provide a new governance structure and managerial oversight with respect to corporate priorities. This was intended to support of the Regional and Network Vice-Presidencies to bring more focus to the Bank’s corporate priorities and to consolidate and align the Bank’s activities and initiatives.
Since its establishment, the Management Committee has, at a meeting on April 25, 2001, established the Global Public Goods (GPG) Fund (of $7.5 million in FY02) in order to provide additional incentives to encourage work on GPG priorities at the country and regional levels, and, at a meeting on July 25, 2001, allocated the resources from the GPG Fund to nine proposals.
3. DEC and OED are exceptions. The DEC Vice-President is a Managing Director and OED reports directly to the Board.
5 Annex A
9. The Partnership Council
The Bank created the Partnership Council in May 1999 to help coordinate the growing range of the Bank’s partnerships and to deliver the Bank’s corporate agenda in a more inclusive and coherent way. The Council is composed of Vice-Presidents particularly active in partnerships and chaired by an MD. It has two major functions—it serves as a clearinghouse for information on the Bank’s global and regional partnerships, and provides advice to individual MDs and the Management Committee on issues relating to partnerships (figure A.1).
10. Responsibilities of Network Vice-Presidencies for Global Programs
While the idea for a new global program may come from virtually anywhere—either outside or inside the Bank—and may be promoted within the Bank by anyone (whether a Board member, the President, a senior manager, or a staff member), once a new global program moves beyond the concept stage, the sponsorship of the program must find an institutional home somewhere in the Bank. For global programs, this is generally one of the network VPUs, and for Regional programs, one of the Regional VPUs. Central units such as DEC and WBI may also have line responsibility for global programs—as DEC has for three programs4 and WBI for three.5 The Information Solutions Group (ISG) has line responsibility for the management of the Development Gateway.6
Line responsibility for global programs includes the following: • Preparing new programs
4. Global Development Network, Partnership in Statistics for the 21st Century, and Integrated Framework for Trade.
5. Global Development Learning Network, Global Knowledge Partnership, and World Links. Management responsibility for implementing World Links is actually shared between World Links (an NGO) and WBI.
6. While the Development Gateway has “exited” the Bank, the Development Gateway Foundation has a management contract with the Bank that has been assigned to ISG.
Figure A.1. Bank’s Management of Global Programs
Management Committee(President and Managing Directors)
Decide on priorities, strategies and major new initiatives
Partnership CouncilAdvisory
Information sharing
Network VPsGlobal and thematic partnerships
Institutional relationships
Central VPsInstitutional relationshipsPartnership instruments
Regional VPs Country and Regional/
Operational partnerships
Board of Governors and Bank’s Board
Management Committee(President and Managing Directors)
Management Committee(President and Managing Directors)
Partnership CouncilAdvisory
Partnership CouncilAdvisory
Network VPsNetwork VPs
Central VPsCentral VPs Regional VPs Country and Regional/
Regional VPs Country and Regional/
Board of Governors and Bank’s BoardBoard of Governors and Bank’s Board
Annex A 6
• Oversight of ongoing programs • Management of those programs that are housed in the Bank • Integrating all partnership activities in the annual business planning process • Sponsoring applications for DGF grants • Initiating, approving, and managing trust fund agreements • Allocating BB resources • Applying for resources from the GPG Fund • The preparation of Sector Strategy Papers, which, since the creation of these networks in
1997, have been expected to scan the universe of relevant players in each sector and discuss existing or other potential partnerships based on the Bank’s comparative advantage vis-à-vis these other players
• An annual review of all the partnership programs managed within its lines based on a clearly defined partnership strategy and including decisions whether to maintain or to exit from individual programs.
Line responsibility of Network VPUs for global programs is distinct from the responsibility of Sector Boards and Network Councils for prioritizing proposals for DGF funding. For example, the Education Sector Board and the HDN Council sponsored the World Links program, and the PREM Council sponsored the three DEC programs in FY01. The Development Gateway and the Partnerships for Capacity in Africa (PACT) were exceptions in FY01 that were not reviewed by Sector Boards and Network Councils under the regular DGF rules.
7 Annex B
Annex B. Defining Global Public Goods Global public goods are distinguished, first, from “private” goods and, second, from “national” public goods. These distinctions help to explain (1) why the World Bank, as a global organization, has become increasingly involved in the provision of global public goods, (2) why the Bank’s involvement is mostly in the form of partnerships with other such organizations, and (3) why the Bank’s financial contributions are largely in the form of grants. The purpose of this annex is to define these terms and to explain their implications for the World Bank’s involvement in global public programs.
“Public goods” are distinguished from private goods by two important characteristics—non-rivalry and non-excludability. Non-rivalry means that many people can consume, use, or enjoy a public good at the same time: one person’s consumption does not reduce the benefits that others can derive from consuming the same good at the same time. Non-excludability means that it is difficult to exclude from consumption those who do not pay for, or otherwise contribute to, the supply of the good.
“Global” public goods are distinguished from national and local public goods by their reach. Their public characteristics, whether non-rivalry and/or non-excludability, spill across national boundaries. People in more than one country can consume the good at the same time. For national and local public goods, however, only those who live in a given country or in a given locality benefit from the provision of such public goods (figure B.1).
In their book, Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century, Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg and Marc Stern extend the concept of reach beyond countries and geography to encompass in addition socioeconomic groups of people and generations.7 Truly global public goods include a variety of global rules that facilitate global commerce, trade, transport, and communications,8 and such phenomena as climate change, communicable diseases, and peace and security.
In a report prepared for the Development Committee, Bank management placed additional emphasis on externalities as global public goods. It described global public goods as “commodities, resources, services and also systems of rules or policy regimes with substantial cross border externalities—that are important for development and poverty reduction, and that can be produced in sufficient supply only through cooperation and collective action by developed and developing countries … this approach involves the idea of both cross-national benefits and cross national collective action to achieve them.”9 In practical terms, the paper argued that in addition to market failure, collective action is needed due to the free-rider problem and the resulting undersupply of public goods. Others, including some participants in the launch workshop for this evaluation, argue that public goods are not the only class of goods that are undersupplied, and that all goods that are undersupplied and that have high marginal social value, whether private or public, should in principle be candidates for provision by global programs.10
7. New York: Oxford University Press for UNDP, 1999, pp. 10-11.
8. Rules and standards governing “free” markets are the purest of pure public goods, although they are abstract. Once in place, anyone within the jurisdiction covered by the rules “consumes” them without reducing their availability to other people. If they are effectively enforced, there is not only no excludability, there is no exit, except by moving outside the jurisdiction of the rules. But because rules are public goods, they are also subject to all the collective action problems of supplying them, including unequal distribution of power among participants who design the rules.
9. “Poverty Reduction and Global Public Goods: Issues for the World Bank in Supporting Global Collective Action,” Report No. DC/2000-16, September 6, 2000, p. 2. Washington, DC.: World Bank and IMF.
10. Richard N. Cooper, “Financing International Public Goods: A Historical Overview and New Challenges” in Gerrard, Ferroni, and Mody (eds.), Global Public Policies and Programs: Implications for Financing and Evaluation (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2001), pp. 15-29.
Annex B 8
Public, Private, Club, and Common Pool Goods
Very few goods are pure public goods. Broadcast television and radio are good examples, within the vicinity of the broadcast signal. Many people can choose to watch the same television program at the same time. All those who live within the vicinity can choose to watch without paying for it, beyond the initial purchase of a television set. Some goods, such as toll roads, are non-rival (up to the point of congestion), but excludable, and are referred to a toll goods or “club” goods. Other goods, such as many natural resources, are non-excludable but rival, and are referred to as “common pool” goods.
However, whether a good is a public, private, club, or common pool can also depend on public policies, technology, and historical circumstances. Just as the construction of a tollbooth converts a major highway from a public good to a club good, public policies such as annual television licenses in the United Kingdom and technologies such as cable and satellite TV and signal scramblers have converted television programs into more of a club good in many parts of the world. Land registration and titling systems have also converted agricultural land from a common pool good to a private good (except for any externalities associated with private land use). Historically, most of the infrastructure in the currently industrialized countries was created through private investment in the nineteenth century, but saw an enormous growth of public sector investment in the twentieth century due to its recognized centrality to economic development.11 Some infrastructure (such as telecommunications) is once again experiencing considerable private sector investment in a legal environment that regards telecommunications as a private good. The same infrastructure can be either a public or a club good, depending on whether access is restricted to those willing and able to pay. Piped water, gas, or a sewer system are excludable until access is gained, after which their use tends to be non-rival depending on a variety of circumstances.
Technological change not only lowers costs but also may cause shifts from private to public goods and vice versa, again with profound implications for financing and institutional arrangements. The Internet, the telephone and telegraph system, piped sewage, irrigation, and transport are all examples of public goods replacing private goods (hand-carried messages, septic tanks, tube wells, and canals), and the desktop computer is an example of a private good replacing a club or a public good 11. World Development Report 1994: Infrastructure for Development (New York and Washington, D.C.: Oxford University Press for the World Bank, 1994).
Figure B.1: Global Public Goods
Excludability
Riv
alry
Club goods
Public goods
Common pool goods
High Low
Low
High Private goods
Glo
bal
Reg
iona
l
Nat
iona
l L
ocal
9 Annex B
(depending on its use), the mainframe computer. Because the ideal combination of public, private, and common pool resources is needed to achieve development changes over time and space, the World Bank, as a multilateral development bank with member countries ranging from the least to the most developed, is in an ideal position to stimulate increased production of public goods.
The essential problem with public goods is that market mechanisms tend to undersupply tham and to oversupply public “bads,” such as air and water pollution. Even “free” markets have some public goods aspects, such as the rules and the standards governing their operation. It is arguable that rules are the purest of pure public goods, albeit abstract public goods. Once in place, anyone within the jurisdiction covered by the rules “consumes” them without reducing their availability to other people. If they are effectively enforced, there is not only no excludability, there is no exit, except by moving outside the jurisdiction of the rules. But because rules are public goods, they are also subject to all the collective action problems of supplying them.
Many public goods (such as improved agricultural technologies, and medicines and vaccines generated by scientific research) are also characterized by economies of scale in production and distribution, require lumpy investments, and thereby involve market failures. When these goods are provided by the private sector (in the form of improved seeds and inputs at a price), they become club goods that the poor are unable to afford. The same applies to the information and investments in the management of common pool resources such as watersheds. In addition to economies of scale in production, the benefits (or costs) of such investments tend to be long-term, sometimes off-site (the so-called spillovers in the management of common pool resources), and thereby difficult to value, measure, or capture, which makes cost recovery or sale of services difficult. The temptation to “free ride” on the benefits of investments financed by others and the “Prisoners’ Dilemma”—the lack of information among potential participants about the benefits of cooperation—impedes the supply of public goods. Therefore, without public action and investment, such activities typically tend to be underfinanced and undersupplied. Not surprisingly, public investments (in agricultural, natural resource, and medical research, for example) have traditionally been, and to date remain, important even in contemporary industrial countries.
Global, Regional, National, and Local Public Goods
Turning now to “global public goods,” few goods are truly global in nature. The boundaries among global, regional, national, and local public goods are often as blurred and context-specific as the distinction between public and private goods. Climate change is a truly global good. Peace is another. Without peace, global trade, transport, and capital movements, not to mention national growth prospects, are inhibited. Some public “bads,” such as infectious diseases and carbon emissions, can be global, regional, national, or local in character.
With respect to supply of global public goods, sometimes a large country or a large private corporation will find it in its individual self-interest to supply a global public good.12 Private foundations and civil society organizations may also provide some global public goods from time to time.13 But in the absence of a global government with taxation powers, some kind of global collective action is necessary to supply them.
12. The Suez and Panama canals are two examples. The former was built by private companies, and the latter by the United States government. 13. The contributions of the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations to the development of high-yielding varieties of wheat and rice at International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) are such an example. Private foundations are distinguished from the commercial private sector by the absence of a profit motive. Civil society organizations are interest groups in society that are independent of the government and distinct from the commercial private sector.
Annex C 10
Annex C. Stages in the Policy Cycle of a Global Program14
1. Identifying and defining an issue that requires global action: Initial research, analysis, awareness-raising, and advocacy, as needed Identifying alternative strategies to address the issue Determining that collective action is required, and that some kind of partnership could be
instrumental in alleviating the problem. 2. Identifying the right partners. Bringing together motivated partners from:
Bilaterals and multilaterals Bank borrowers Public sector Private sector Civil society including NGOs.
3. Formalizing the partnership:
Selecting a cost-effective strategy: Determining, ex-ante, the potential cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies with implicit partners Agreeing upon the appropriate degree of formality–from simple MOU to formal agreements
–depending on, among other things, the level of resource commitments Agreeing on financing, governance, and management arrangements In due course, a “new” organization may have to be created.
4. Engaging other stakeholders:15
Systematic consultation to identify stakeholders in different groups: donors, implementers, beneficiaries, professionals, and country-level task managers Assessing their needs, priorities, interests, and perspectives Getting their input into the objective function and strategy Agreeing on the extent of their involvement, both quantitative and qualitative.
5. Designing the program
Governance and management arrangements Financial arrangements Linkage with country work Risks and risk management Monitoring and evaluation.
6. Implementation:
Establishing objectives and targets for implementation–proposed inputs and resource requirements Mobilizing resources–financial, physical, and human resources, including technical expertise,
secondees, paid consultants, volunteers, and administrative support Putting in place governance and management arrangements, and accountability to partners
and other stakeholders 14. The policy cycle may end with the establishment of new policies and associated institutions that facilitate individual action by national governments or the private sector. Other cycles may lead to a new global program of activities to support or implement the new policies. 15. Partners are a subset of stakeholders. Stakeholders are “parties who are interested in or affected, either positively or negatively, by the program.”
11 Annex C
7. Reviewing and revising: Measurement and monitoring of outputs, outcomes, resource use, and partnership impact Internal and external assessments of the changing environment, to determine if the activity is
still relevant in the changing environment Self-and independent evaluations Revision procedures–built-in process of revising arrangements, objectives, and targets in light
of experience and feedback on regular basis, including decisions to “declare victory and get out” Exit strategy–procedure for terminating the partnership once objectives are achieved or if
involvement of one or more partners becomes untenable.
Ann
ex D
. In
vent
ory
of 7
0 G
loba
l Pro
gram
s
Prog
ram
St
art
date
Lega
l en
tity
In-
hous
eD
GF
stat
us
DG
F gr
ant
FY02
Trus
t fu
nds
TF
cont
ri-bu
tions
FY
01
Cou
ntry
-le
vel
TA
Ret
ail-
ing
gran
ts
Part
ners
ESSD
Net
wor
k
Envi
ronm
ent
1 C
ritic
al E
cosy
stem
Pa
rtner
ship
Fun
d 20
00
N
oN
oW
indo
w1B
5.
00N
o
Yes
Yes
Con
serv
atio
n In
tern
atio
nal,*
GEF
, Mac
Arth
ur F
ound
atio
n
Fo
rest
Par
tner
ship
s Pr
ogra
m
Win
dow
2
0.65
2 Fo
rest
Allia
nce
for
Con
serv
atio
n an
d Su
stai
nabl
e U
se
1999
N
oYe
s(J
oint
w
ith
WW
F)
Win
dow
2
(0.3
0)Ye
sYe
sYe
s W
WF
3 Fo
rest
Tre
nds*
19
99
Yes
No
Win
dow
2
(0.1
0)N
o 1.
01
No
No
Gre
enpe
ace,
WW
F, G
loba
l Env
. Fun
ds, R
ainf
ores
t Ac
tion
Net
wor
k, E
cotru
st, O
'Bot
icar
io, A
ssid
oman
Mat
er
Engi
neer
ing
Wey
erha
eser
, Col
lins
Com
pani
es
4 Pr
ogra
m o
n Fo
rest
s (P
RO
FOR
II)
2002
N
oYe
sW
indo
w2
(0.
15)
No
Ye
s N
o FA
O, B
ilate
ral a
genc
ies,
Par
ticip
atin
g de
velo
ping
co
untri
es
5 Th
e G
loba
l Mec
hani
sm
to C
omba
t D
eser
tific
atio
n
2001
No
No
Win
dow
2 1.
25Ye
s
Yes
No
IFAD
*, U
ND
P, U
NEP
, AfD
B, A
DB,
IDB,
GEF
, CC
D S
ect.
6 M
illenn
ium
Eco
syst
em
Asse
ssm
ent
2000
No
No
Exite
dFY
01
N
o
No
No
ICLA
RM
,* U
NF,
FAO
, UN
DP,
UN
EP, U
NES
CO
, CG
IAR
, W
HO
, GEF
, Nor
way
, SID
A, N
ASA,
WR
I, Pa
ckar
d,
Roc
kefe
ller,
Avin
a, S
umm
it, W
alla
ce G
loba
l Fun
d, 3
rd
Wor
ld A
cade
my
of S
cien
ces,
Mer
idia
n In
stitu
te
7 C
olla
bora
tive
Partn
ersh
ip o
n Fo
rest
s 19
98
No
No
non-
DG
F
No
N
o N
o U
NFF
,* D
ESA,
FAO
, UN
DP,
UN
EP, C
BD, I
TTO
, CIF
OR
8 G
loba
l Env
ironm
ent
Faci
lity*
19
91
No
No
non-
DG
F
Yes
329.
88
Yes
Yes
FAO
, IFA
D, U
NEP
, UN
DP,
UN
IDO
, RD
Bs, G
EF M
embe
r C
ount
ries
Annex D 12
Prog
ram
St
art
date
Lega
l en
tity
In-
hous
eD
GF
stat
us
DG
F gr
ant
FY02
Trus
t fu
nds
TF
cont
ri-bu
tions
FY
01
Cou
ntry
-le
vel
TA
Ret
ail-
ing
gran
ts
Part
ners
9
Inte
rnat
iona
l Cor
al R
eef
Initi
ativ
e 19
95
No
No
non-
DG
F
No
Ye
s N
o Ph
ilippi
nes*
/Sw
eden
* (jo
intly
), U
NES
CE,
UN
DP,
UN
EP,
CO
RAL
, WW
F, IU
CN
, 4 C
oral
Ree
f Net
wor
ks: C
OR
DIO
, IC
RAN
, IC
RIN
, GC
RM
N
10 M
ultil
ater
al F
und
for t
he
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Mon
treal
Pro
toco
l
1991
N
oN
ono
n-D
GF
Ye
s 35
.10
No
Yes
UN
EP*,
UN
DP,
UN
IDO
, Mem
ber C
ount
ries
11 P
roto
type
Car
bon
Fund
20
00
No
Yes
non-
DG
F
Ye
s9.
01Ye
sYe
s C
anad
a, F
inla
nd, J
apan
, The
Net
herla
nds,
Nor
way
, Sw
eden
, BP
Amoc
o, C
hubu
Ele
ctric
Pow
er C
ompa
ny
Inc.
, Chu
goku
Ele
ctric
Pow
er C
ompa
ny In
c., D
euts
che
Bank
, Ele
ctra
bel,
Fortu
m O
YJ, G
lide
Stra
tegi
c Si
tuat
ions
B.
V., G
az d
e Fr
ance
, Kyu
shu
Elec
tric
Pow
er C
ompa
ny
Inc.
, MIT
Car
bon
Fund
, Mits
ubis
hi, N
orsk
Hyd
ro A
SA,
RW
E Ak
tieng
esel
lsch
aft,
Skik
oku,
Sta
toil,
Toh
oku
Elec
tric
Pow
er C
ompa
ny In
c., T
okyo
Ele
ctric
Pow
er
Com
pany
Inc.
R
ural
Dev
elop
men
t
12 C
onsu
ltativ
e G
roup
on
Inte
rnat
iona
l Agr
icul
tura
l R
esea
rch
1972
N
oYe
sW
indo
w1A
5
0.00
Yes
80.7
0 Ye
s N
o FA
O, U
ND
P, S
PAAR
Info
rmat
ion
Syst
em /
Net
herla
nds
CG
IAR
Lia
ison
, Nov
artis
Fou
ndat
ion
for S
usta
inab
le
Dev
elop
men
t, Fo
ndo
Reg
iona
l de
Tecn
olog
ia A
gro-
pecu
aria
, Fou
rth In
tern
atio
nal T
echn
ical
Con
fere
nce
on
Plan
t Gen
etic
Res
ourc
es, E
urop
ean
Initi
ativ
e fo
r Ag
ricul
tura
l Res
earc
h fo
r Dev
elop
men
t (EI
ARD
)
13 G
loba
l Wat
er
Partn
ersh
ip*
1996
No
No
Exiti
ngFY
02
0.40
No
N
o N
o U
ND
P, 1
1 bi
late
ral a
genc
ies,
For
d Fo
unda
tion
14 T
he W
orld
Com
mis
sion
on
Dam
s 19
98
N
oN
oEx
ited
FY01
Yes
0.40
N
o N
o IU
CN
,* W
HO
, WR
I, Tr
ansp
aren
cy In
tern
atio
nal,
Wor
ld
Arch
eolo
gica
l Con
gres
s, In
tern
atio
nal E
nerg
y Ag
ency
, En
v. M
onito
ring
Gro
up, I
nter
natio
nal C
omm
. on
Larg
e D
ams,
Inte
rnat
iona
l Riv
ers
Net
wor
k, In
tern
atio
nal A
ssoc
. fo
r Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
15 C
apac
ity B
uild
ing
for
Trad
e Po
licy,
Stra
tegy
D
evel
opm
ent,
and
WTO
N
egot
iatio
ns
1999
N
oYe
sno
n-D
GF
Ye
s
No
No
DFI
D, N
ethe
rland
s, U
ND
P, A
ERC
, SEL
A, E
SCW
A
13 Annex D
Prog
ram
St
art
date
Lega
l en
tity
In-
hous
eD
GF
stat
us
DG
F gr
ant
FY02
Trus
t fu
nds
TF
cont
ri-bu
tions
FY
01
Cou
ntry
-le
vel
TA
Ret
ail-
ing
gran
ts
Part
ners
16
Com
mod
ity P
rice
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t Pro
ject
19
99
No
Yes
non-
DG
F
Yes
Ye
s N
o FA
O, U
NC
TAD
, ID
B, A
fDB,
Eur
opea
n C
omm
issi
on,
DFI
D, A
frica
n, C
arib
bean
& P
acifi
c G
roup
of S
tate
s,
Net
herla
nds
Min
istry
of F
orei
gn A
ffairs
, Zur
ich
Re
Insu
ranc
e, N
orth
Am
eric
a, T
otal
Fina
Elf,
SO
FREC
O,
Day
Rob
inso
n In
tern
atio
nal C
onsu
lting
Ltd
., So
ciét
é Fr
anca
ise
d'As
sura
nce-
Cre
dit,
Rab
oban
k, W
orld
Tra
de
Org
aniz
atio
n, V
rije
Uni
vers
iteit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Fin
ance
, U
gand
a C
offe
e Tr
ade
Fede
ratio
n, U
nive
rsity
of A
then
s,
OPE
C, I
nter
natio
nal C
oppe
r Stu
dy G
roup
Inte
rnat
iona
l, C
oope
rativ
e Al
lianc
e, In
tern
atio
nal F
eder
atio
n of
Ag
ricul
ture
Pro
duce
rs, I
nter
natio
nal S
ugar
Org
aniz
atio
n In
tern
atio
nal R
ubbe
r Stu
dy G
roup
, Mar
ché
a Te
rme
Inte
rnat
iona
l de
Fran
ce (M
ATIF
), Af
rican
Spe
cial
ty
Prod
ucts
, ABN
-AM
RO
, Ass
ocia
tion
of C
offe
e Pr
oduc
ing
Cou
ntrie
s, T
he B
oard
of T
rade
of t
he C
ity o
f New
Yor
k,
CM
S W
ebVi
ew p
lc, C
entre
Etu
de p
our l
a re
cher
che
le
Dév
elop
pem
ent I
nter
natio
nale
(CER
DI),
Com
mon
Fun
d fo
r Com
mod
ities
, Com
mon
wea
lth S
ecre
taria
t, C
PM
Gro
up, C
rédi
t Lyo
nnai
s, R
ouis
e D
eriv
ativ
es, D
ento
n W
ilde,
Sap
te E
cole
Nat
iona
le S
uper
ieur
e Ag
rono
miq
ue
de R
enne
s, F
acul
eit d
er E
cono
mis
che
Wet
ensc
happ
en
Vrije
Uni
vers
iteit,
Eco
nom
ic a
nd S
ocia
l Ins
titut
e, F
ree
Uni
vers
ity, F
lem
ings
-- R
ober
t Fle
min
gs In
sura
nce
Brok
ers
Ltd.
, For
tis B
ank,
Fut
ures
and
Opt
ions
As
soci
atio
n (F
OA)
, Fut
ures
Indu
stry
Inst
itute
, The
Gra
in
and
Feed
Ass
ocia
tion
17 F
eedi
ng M
inds
, Fig
htin
g H
unge
r 19
99
No
No
non-
DG
F
No
N
o N
o W
orld
Foo
d D
ay U
SA,*
FAO
, UN
ESC
O, F
utur
e H
arve
st,
Amer
ican
Fed
. of T
each
ers,
IFPR
I, N
at. P
eace
Cor
ps
Asso
c., N
ewsw
eek
Ed. P
rogr
am
18 G
loba
l Int
egra
ted
Pest
M
anag
emen
t Fac
ility
19
96
N
oN
ono
n-D
GF
No
Yes
Yes
FAO
,* U
ND
P, U
NEP
19 T
he P
opul
ar C
oalit
ion
to
Erad
icat
e H
unge
r and
Po
verty
1996
N
oN
ono
n-D
GF
N
o
Yes
No
IFAD
,* FA
O, W
orld
Foo
d Pr
ogra
m, E
urop
ean
Com
mis
sion
, OEC
D R
eps
Annex D 14
Prog
ram
St
art
date
Lega
l en
tity
In-
hous
eD
GF
stat
us
DG
F gr
ant
FY02
Trus
t fu
nds
TF
cont
ri-bu
tions
FY
01
Cou
ntry
-le
vel
TA
Ret
ail-
ing
gran
ts
Part
ners
Soci
al D
evel
opm
ent
20 S
mal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
19
83
No
Yes
Win
dow
1B
2.
41N
o
Ye
sYe
s
21 P
ost-C
onfli
ct F
und
1998
N
o Ye
s W
indo
w
1B
8.00
Yes
0.30
Yes
Yes
22 In
tern
atio
nal F
orum
on
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g 19
98
N
oN
ono
n-D
GF
No
No
No
ALO
P (C
osta
Ric
a),*
FAO
, IFA
D, U
NN
GLS
, UN
DP,
U
NIC
EF, W
HO
, AD
B, A
fDB,
CW
F, A
ustra
lia, C
anad
a,
Den
mar
k, E
U, G
erm
any,
Jap
an, N
ew Z
eala
nd, N
orw
ay,
Swed
en, U
nite
d Ki
ngdo
m, U
nite
d St
ates
, Asi
an R
ural
In
stitu
te, C
omite
de
Lias
on O
NG
-UE,
ICR
, Int
erAc
tion,
JA
NIC
, Sta
r Kam
puch
ea, N
GO
RC
, Shb
hagi
Shi
ksha
n Ke
ndra
, SAM
ARTH
AN, A
PBAE
, SAP
, Act
ion
Aid,
NG
O
Fede
ratio
n, F
WR
M, C
PDC
, CEP
ES, S
EHAS
, PR
IA,
PAID
, PR
IP T
rust
, IAF
, FIC
ON
G, A
NG
OC
, MW
ENG
O,
ABO
NG
, Aga
Kha
n Fo
unda
tion,
The
Asi
a Fo
unda
tion,
In
ter-A
mer
ican
Fou
ndat
ion
23 P
RSP
Act
ion
Lear
ning
Pr
ogra
m
2000
N
oYe
sno
n-D
GF
Yes
0.30
No
No
Uni
ted
King
dom
FS
E
24 F
acilit
y fo
r Fin
anci
al
Sect
or S
treng
then
ing
2002
N
oYe
sW
indo
w2
0.50
No
Yes
Yes
25 T
he T
oron
to
Inte
rnat
iona
l Lea
ders
hip
Cen
tre fo
r Fin
anci
al
Sect
or S
uper
visi
on
1997
Yes
No
Exite
dFY
00
N
o
No
No
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Bus
ines
s Sc
hool
(Tor
onto
),* IM
F, B
IS
26 F
inan
cial
Sec
tor
Asse
ssm
ent P
rogr
am
1999
N
oYe
s(jo
int
with
IM
F)
non-
DG
F N
oYe
sN
oIM
F
15 Annex D
Prog
ram
St
art
date
Lega
l en
tity
In-
hous
eD
GF
stat
us
DG
F gr
ant
FY02
Trus
t fu
nds
TF
cont
ri-bu
tions
FY
01
Cou
ntry
-le
vel
TA
Ret
ail-
ing
gran
ts
Part
ners
27
Fin
anci
al S
tabi
lity
Foru
m
1999
N
oN
ono
n-D
GF
N
o
No
No
BIS,
* IM
F, O
ECD
+ In
tl. R
egul
ator
y/Su
perv
isor
y Ag
enci
es, A
ustra
lia, C
anad
a, F
ranc
e, G
erm
any,
Hon
g Ko
ng, I
taly
, Jap
an, N
ethe
r-lan
ds, S
inga
pore
, Uni
ted
King
dom
, Uni
ted
Stat
es o
f Am
eric
a
H
DN
Net
wor
k
Ed
ucat
ion
G
loba
l Dev
elop
men
t N
etw
ork
– Ed
ucat
ion
Res
earc
h C
ompo
nent
2002
Win
dow
2
0.75
28 T
he P
artn
ersh
ip fo
r C
hild
Dev
elop
men
t 19
92
N
oN
oW
indo
w2
0.39
No
Yes
No
Oxf
ord
Uni
vers
ity*
Pr
ogra
m fo
r Edu
catio
n St
atis
tics
Win
dow
2
1.07
29 U
NES
CO
Inst
itute
for
Stat
istic
s 20
00
No
No
Win
dow
2 (
0.85
)N
oYe
sN
o U
NES
CO
*
30 O
ECD
Wor
ld E
duca
tion
Indi
cato
rs P
rogr
am
1999
N
oN
oW
indo
w2
(0.
22)
No
Yes
No
OEC
D*
Pr
ogra
m fo
r the
As
sess
men
t of S
tude
nt
Achi
evem
ent
Win
dow
2
1.62
31 T
rend
s in
Mat
hem
atic
s an
d Sc
ienc
e Ac
hiev
emen
t Aro
und
the
Wor
ld
1998
No
No
Win
dow
2 (
1.04
)N
oYe
sN
o Bo
ston
Col
lege
,* St
atis
tics
Can
ada,
Inte
rnat
iona
l Ed
ucat
ion
Asso
ciat
ion,
Edu
catio
nal T
estin
g Se
rvic
e
32 P
rogr
ess
in In
tern
atio
nal
Rea
ding
Lite
racy
Stu
dy
2000
No
No
Win
dow
2 (
0.58
)N
oYe
sN
o Bo
ston
Col
lege
,* St
atis
tics
Can
ada,
Inte
rnat
iona
l Ed
ucat
ion
Asso
ciat
ion,
Nat
iona
l Fou
ndat
ion
for
Educ
atio
n R
esea
rch
(Wal
es),
Educ
atio
nal T
estin
g Se
rvic
e,
Annex D 16
Prog
ram
St
art
date
Lega
l en
tity
In-
hous
eD
GF
stat
us
DG
F gr
ant
FY02
Trus
t fu
nds
TF
cont
ri-bu
tions
FY
01
Cou
ntry
-le
vel
TA
Ret
ail-
ing
gran
ts
Part
ners
33
Wor
ld L
inks
for
Dev
elop
men
t 19
98
Yes
Yes
(Joi
nt
with
W
orLD
NG
O)
Win
dow
2
0.75
Yes
0.22
Yes
No
Boar
d of
8-1
5 pr
ivat
e in
divi
dual
s
34 F
ocus
ing
Res
ourc
es o
n Ef
fect
ive
Scho
ol H
ealth
20
00
No
No
non-
DG
F
No
Ye
s N
o St
. Mar
y’s
Med
ical
Sch
ool (
Lond
on),*
UN
ESC
O,
UN
ICEF
, WH
O
H
ealth
, Nut
ritio
n &
Po
pula
tion
35 C
entre
of E
xcel
lenc
e fo
r N
utrit
ion,
Inte
rnat
iona
l C
ente
r for
Dia
rrhea
l D
isea
se R
esea
rch,
Ba
ngla
desh
1999
No
No
Exite
dFY
01
N
o
Yes
Yes
ICD
DR
(Ban
glad
esh)
,* W
HO
, UN
ICEF
, EU
, 7 P
art I
co
untri
es, I
RC
, For
d, N
IH
36 G
loba
l For
um fo
r Hea
lth
Res
earc
h*
1998
Yes
No
Win
dow
1B
6.93
No
N
o Ye
s W
HO
, Sev
eral
gov
ernm
ents
, Sev
eral
NG
Os,
Roc
kefe
ller
seve
ral o
ther
foun
datio
ns, S
ever
al c
ompa
nies
, Res
earc
h In
stitu
tions
, uni
vers
ities
C
hild
hood
Illn
ess
W
indo
w
1B
37 G
loba
l Allia
nce
for
Vacc
ines
and
Im
mun
izat
ion*
2000
Yes
No
Win
dow
1B
N
o
Yes
Yes
WH
O, U
NIC
EF, A
DB,
Par
t 1 re
pres
ente
d by
Uni
ted
King
dom
, Nor
way
, Net
herla
nds,
Par
t 2 re
pres
ente
d by
Bh
utan
and
Mal
i, PA
TH, I
FPM
A re
pres
ente
d by
Ad
vent
ism
Pas
teur
, Par
ma
indu
stry
repr
esen
ted
by
CIG
B, C
DC
, Ins
titut
Pas
teur
IN
DEP
TH H
ealth
Su
rvei
llanc
e an
d Ex
perim
enta
l Net
wor
k
Win
dow
1B
Th
e In
tern
atio
nal A
IDS
Vacc
ine
Initi
ativ
e
W
indo
w1B
(
0.70
)
M
edic
ines
for M
alar
ia
Vent
ure
Win
dow
1B
17 Annex D
Prog
ram
St
art
date
Lega
l en
tity
In-
hous
eD
GF
stat
us
DG
F gr
ant
FY02
Trus
t fu
nds
TF
cont
ri-bu
tions
FY
01
Cou
ntry
-le
vel
TA
Ret
ail-
ing
gran
ts
Part
ners
38
Glo
bal M
icro
nutri
ent
Initi
ativ
e*
1992
Ye
sN
oEx
iting
FY02
1.
20N
oYe
sYe
s U
NIC
EF, U
ND
P, C
IDA/
IDR
C, U
SAID
, WFP
, Gat
es
39 P
opul
atio
n an
d R
epro
duct
ive
Hea
lth
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g Pr
ogra
m (P
RH
)
1998
No
Yes
Win
dow
1B
2.00
No
Ye
s Ye
s Se
vera
l int
erna
tiona
l NG
Os
40 R
oll B
ack
Mal
aria
19
99
No
No
Win
dow
2
1.50
No
Yes
No
WH
O,*
UN
ICEF
, UN
DP,
Reg
. Dev
. Ban
ks, E
U,
Seve
ral g
over
nmen
ts
41 S
peci
al P
rogr
amm
e fo
r R
esea
rch
and
Trai
ning
in
Tro
pica
l Dis
ease
s (T
DR
)
1975
No
No
Win
dow
1A
2.50
Yes
Ye
s Ye
s W
HO
,* U
ND
P, R
eps.
of 2
0 go
vts,
Rep
s. o
f Bra
zil,
Chi
na,
Mal
aysi
a, M
exic
o, G
ates
Dia
gnos
tics
42 S
peci
al P
rogr
amm
e of
R
esea
rch,
Dev
elop
men
t &
Res
earc
h Tr
aini
ng in
H
uman
Rep
rodu
ctio
n (H
RP)
1988
No
No
Win
dow
1A
2.00
No
Ye
s Ye
s W
HO
,* U
ND
P, U
NFP
A, R
ocke
felle
r, G
ates
, Pac
kard
43 S
top
TB
1999
N
o N
o W
indo
w
2 0.
70N
o
Yes
No
WH
O,*
UN
ICEF
, CD
C, I
UTL
D, A
mer
ican
Lun
g As
soc.
, Am
eric
an T
hora
cic
Soci
ety
44 U
.N. A
dmin
istra
tive
and
Coo
rdin
atin
g C
omm
ittee
, Sub
-C
omm
ittee
on
Nut
ritio
n
1990
N
oN
oEx
ited
FY99
N
oN
oN
oU
.N. (
Gen
eva,
)* 1
8 U
.N. a
genc
ies
or c
ospo
nsor
ed
agen
cies
, AD
B, 1
0 Pa
rt 1
coun
tries
, 5 P
art 2
cou
ntrie
s (M
ali,
Keny
a, G
ambi
a, Is
rael
, S. A
frica
), IU
NS,
Sav
e th
e C
hild
ren,
HKI
, Car
e, C
ARIT
AS, I
CC
IDD
, Int
. Fam
ine
Cen
ter,
Con
cern
, IBF
AN, M
arch
of D
imes
, Oxf
am, I
FPR
I
45 U
NAI
DS
(Joi
nt U
nite
d N
atio
ns P
rogr
amm
e on
H
IV/A
IDS)
*
1996
Yes
No
Win
dow
1B
4.00
No
Ye
s N
o W
HO
,* U
NES
CO
, UN
DP,
UN
ICEF
, UN
DC
P, U
NFP
A,
Rep
s fro
m 2
2 Pa
rt I a
nd P
art I
I cou
ntrie
s
46 C
omm
issi
on o
n M
acro
econ
omic
s an
d H
ealth
2000
N
oN
ono
n-D
GF
N
o
No
No
WH
O,*
UN
DP,
IMF,
OEC
D, H
arva
rd U
nive
rsity
(Cen
ter
for I
nter
natio
nal D
evel
opm
ent),
Eco
nom
ic C
omm
issi
on
for A
frica
Annex D 18
Prog
ram
St
art
date
Lega
l en
tity
In-
hous
eD
GF
stat
us
DG
F gr
ant
FY02
Trus
t fu
nds
TF
cont
ri-bu
tions
FY
01
Cou
ntry
-le
vel
TA
Ret
ail-
ing
gran
ts
Part
ners
47
Lym
phat
ic F
iliaria
sis
2002
N
o Ye
s no
n-D
GF
Ye
s 8.
00
Yes
No
WH
O, U
NIC
EF, D
FID
, Jap
anes
e M
OH
W, H
ealth
and
D
evel
opm
ent I
nter
natio
nal,
Inte
rchu
rch
Med
ical
As
sist
ance
, Car
ter C
ente
r, G
laxo
Sm
ithKl
ine,
Mer
ck &
C
o., A
mra
d IC
T, L
iver
pool
Sch
ool o
f Tro
pica
l Med
icin
e,
CD
C, E
mor
y U
nive
rsity
Soci
al P
rote
ctio
n
48 S
ocia
l Pro
tect
ion
for t
he
Info
rmal
Eco
nom
y 19
99
No
Yes
non-
DG
F N
oN
oN
o
49 U
nder
stan
ding
C
hild
ren'
s W
ork
2000
N
oN
ono
n-D
GF
No
No
No
UN
ICEF
*, IL
O
ISG
50 D
evel
opm
ent G
atew
ay
Foun
datio
n 20
01
Yes
Yes
Win
dow
2 1.
00Ye
sYe
sYe
s Au
stra
lia, G
erm
any,
Jap
an, N
ethe
rland
s, B
razi
l, In
dia,
So
uth
Kore
a, T
rans
natio
nal,
Bloo
mbe
rg
PREM
Net
wor
k
51 F
orgi
ng P
artn
ersh
ips
for
Goo
d G
over
nanc
e in
Pu
blic
Exp
endi
ture
and
R
ecor
ds M
anag
emen
t
2002
No
Yes
Win
dow
2 0.
90N
o
Yes
No
EU, I
MF,
and
oth
ers
52 G
loba
l Dev
elop
men
t N
etw
ork*
19
98
Ye
sN
o*W
indo
w1B
4.
70Ye
s 1.
27
Yes
No
UN
DP,
Intl.
Eco
n. A
ssoc
., R
egio
nal G
DN
reps
. fro
m
vario
us u
nive
rsiti
es, a
cade
mie
s, e
tc.
53 In
tegr
ated
Fra
mew
ork
for T
rade
19
97
N
oYe
sW
indo
w2
0.50
Yes
Ye
s Ye
s??
UN
DP,
UN
CTA
D, I
MF,
WTO
, ITC
54 P
artn
ersh
ips
in
Stat
istic
s fo
r the
21s
t C
entu
ry (P
ARIS
-21)
2001
No
No
Exiti
ngFY
02
0.50
Yes
Ye
s Ye
s O
ECD
,* U
NSD
, UN
DP,
UN
FPA,
IMF,
EC
, DFI
D,
NO
RAD
, Ger
man
y, F
ranc
e, S
wis
s Fe
d. S
tatis
tics
Offi
ce,
Kyrg
yz R
epub
lic N
atio
nal C
omm
ittee
on
Stat
istic
s,
priv
ate
indi
vidu
als
(sta
tistic
ians
)
55 D
AC N
etw
ork
on G
ood
Gov
erna
nce
and
Cap
acity
Dev
elop
men
t (G
OVN
ET)
2000
N
oN
ono
n-D
GF
Ye
s
No
No
OEC
D,*
DFI
D, O
ther
DAC
mem
bers
19 Annex D
Prog
ram
St
art
date
Lega
l en
tity
In-
hous
eD
GF
stat
us
DG
F gr
ant
FY02
Trus
t fu
nds
TF
cont
ri-bu
tions
FY
01
Cou
ntry
-le
vel
TA
Ret
ail-
ing
gran
ts
Part
ners
PS
I Net
wor
k
56 B
usin
ess
Partn
ers
for
Dev
elop
men
t (BP
D)
1998
No
No
Exiti
ngFY
02
0.25
Yes
No
No
BP
D -
Know
ledg
e R
esou
rce
Gro
up
Exite
dFY
01
C
ivic
us,*
Prin
ce o
f Wal
es B
usin
ess
Lead
ers'
For
um
BP
D -
Glo
bal
Partn
ersh
ip fo
r You
th
Dev
elop
men
t
Ex
ited
FY01
In
tern
atio
nal Y
outh
Fou
ndat
ion,
* Kel
logg
Com
pany
BP
D -
Nat
ural
R
esou
rces
Clu
ster
Ex
ited
FY01
CAR
E In
tern
atio
nal,*
WM
C R
esou
rces
Ltd
.
BP
D -
Glo
bal R
oad
Safe
ty P
artn
ersh
ip
Ex
iting
FY02
(0
.25)
Inte
rnat
iona
l Fed
erat
ion
of R
ed C
ross
and
Red
Cre
scen
t So
ciet
ies*
BP
D -
Wat
er a
nd
Sani
tatio
n C
lust
er
Exite
dFY
01
Wat
erAi
d,* V
iven
di
57 C
ities
Allia
nce
2001
N
o Ye
s W
indo
w
2 1.
70Ye
s 3.
28
Yes
Yes
UN
CH
S (H
abita
t), 1
0 bi
late
ral a
genc
ies,
Fou
r um
brel
la
orga
niza
tions
of l
ocal
gov
ernm
ents
58 C
onsu
ltativ
e G
roup
to
Assi
st th
e Po
ores
t 19
95
N
oYe
sW
indo
w1A
7.
13Ye
s 4.
84
Yes
Yes
ILO
, UN
DP,
UN
CD
F, U
NC
TAD
, AfD
B, A
sDB,
EBR
D,
IDB,
16
bila
tera
l age
ncie
s, E
U, A
rgid
ius,
For
d Fo
unda
tion
59 G
loba
l Cor
pora
te
Gov
erna
nce
Foru
m
2001
No
Yes
Win
dow
2 0.
50Ye
s
No
Yes
OEC
D, 7
bila
tera
l age
ncie
s, In
dia
60 T
he In
form
atio
n fo
r D
evel
opm
ent P
rogr
am
(info
Dev
)
1996
No
Yes
Win
dow
1B
4.00
Yes
2.60
Ye
s Ye
s 15
bila
tera
l age
ncie
s, E
U, B
razi
l, C
olom
bia,
El S
alva
dor,
Cis
co S
yste
ms,
IBM
, Mot
orol
a, T
elec
om It
alia
61 P
rove
ntio
n C
onso
rtium
20
01
No
Yes
Win
dow
2
0.33
Yes
1.43
N
o Ye
s U
ND
P, W
HO
, UN
EP, W
MO
, IAD
B, A
fDB,
OAS
, AsD
B,
Switz
erla
nd, I
FRC
, IU
CN
, Gra
mee
n Ba
nk, 1
7-m
embe
r Pr
esid
ing
Cou
ncil
and
16-m
embe
r Ste
erin
g C
omm
ittee
62 P
ublic
-Priv
ate
Infra
stru
ctur
e Ad
viso
ry
Faci
lity
2000
No
Yes
Win
dow
2 2.
50Ye
s 10
.90
Yes
Yes
UN
DP,
AsD
B, 9
bila
tera
l age
ncie
s
Annex D 20
Prog
ram
St
art
date
Lega
l en
tity
In-
hous
eD
GF
stat
us
DG
F gr
ant
FY02
Trus
t fu
nds
TF
cont
ri-bu
tions
FY
01
Cou
ntry
-le
vel
TA
Ret
ail-
ing
gran
ts
Part
ners
21 Annex D
63 S
olar
Dev
elop
men
t G
roup
20
00
Ye
sN
oW
indo
w2
2.00
No
Ye
s Ye
s Tr
iodo
s PV
Par
tner
s (A
rling
ton,
VA)
*, Se
lf-pe
rpet
uatin
g bo
ard
64 C
olla
bora
tive
Gro
up o
n Ar
tisan
al a
nd S
mal
l-Sc
ale
Min
ing
2001
N
oYe
sno
n-D
GF
Ye
s
No
No
ILO
, UN
, DFI
D, C
I, In
tern
atio
nal C
ounc
il fo
r Met
als
and
the
Envi
ronm
ent,
Japa
nese
Inst
itute
for G
eo-S
cien
ces
and
the
Envi
ronm
ent
65 D
igita
l Opp
ortu
nity
Tas
k (D
OT)
For
ce
2001
N
oYe
s(J
oint
w
ith
UN
DP)
non-
DG
F
No
N
o N
o EC
OSO
C, I
TU, U
ND
P, U
NES
CO
, UN
CTA
D, O
ECD
, G8
plus
EU
, 8 d
evel
opin
g co
untry
gov
ernm
ents
, One
from
ea
ch G
8 co
untry
, One
from
eac
h G
8 co
untry
and
3
glob
al n
etw
orks
66 E
nerg
y Se
ctor
M
anag
emen
t As
sist
ance
Pro
gram
me
1982
N
oYe
sno
n-D
GF
Ye
s 4.
19
Yes
Yes
UN
DP,
12
bila
tera
l age
ncie
s, 8
um
brel
la g
roup
s
67 F
orei
gn In
vest
men
t Ad
viso
ry S
ervi
ce
1986
N
oYe
sno
n-D
GF
Ye
s 4.
90
Yes
No
10 b
ilate
ral a
genc
ies
68 W
ater
and
San
itatio
n Pr
ogra
m
1978
N
oYe
sno
n-D
GF
Ye
s 14
.13
Yes
Yes
UN
DP,
AsD
B, 1
4 bi
late
ral a
genc
ies
W
BI (
Wor
ld B
ank
Inst
itute
)
69 G
loba
l Dev
elop
men
t Le
arni
ng N
etw
ork
2001
No
Yes
non-
DG
F Ye
s0.
88Ye
sN
oD
ista
nce
Lear
ning
Cen
ters
, Pro
gram
Par
tner
s, a
nd
Don
ors
70 T
he G
loba
l Kno
wle
dge
Partn
ersh
ip
1998
No
No
non-
DG
F Ye
s0.
19N
oN
oM
alay
sia,
* Can
ada,
Sw
itzer
land
, IIC
D (N
ethe
rland
s), I
PA
(Can
ada)
, Pro
Poor
Info
tech
Cen
tre (I
ndia
), R
escu
e M
issi
on (Z
ambi
a), I
TNTI
(Nep
al),
Abou
t 50
othe
r m
embe
rs o
f all
kind
s.
Not
e: W
here
the
prog
ram
is m
anag
ed o
utsi
de th
e W
orld
Ban
k, *
indi
cate
s th
e or
gani
zatio
n w
here
the
prog
ram
is b
eing
man
aged
.
Ann
ex E
. G
loba
l Pro
gram
s for
in-D
epth
Cas
e St
udie
s
Pr
ogra
m
star
ted
(fisc
al y
ear)
Man
agem
ent
DG
F al
loca
tions
FY
02
($ m
illio
ns)
TF c
ontr
ibut
ions
FY
01
($ m
illio
ns)
Mos
t rec
ent
inde
pend
ent
eval
uatio
n
ESSD
Net
wor
k (8
pro
gram
s)
Envi
ronm
ent
Glo
bal E
nviro
nmen
t Fac
ility
(GEF
) 19
91
Exte
rnal
a
-32
9.88
2001
Mul
tilat
eral
Fun
d fo
r the
Im
plem
enta
tion
of M
ontre
al P
roto
col
1991
Ex
tern
al-
35.1
0
Crit
ical
Eco
syst
ems
Partn
ersh
ip F
und
2000
Ex
tern
al
5.00
-
Prot
otyp
e C
arbo
n Fu
nd
2000
In
-hou
se
- 9.
01
Rur
al D
evel
opm
ent
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up fo
r Int
erna
tiona
l Ag
ricul
tura
l Res
earc
h (C
GIA
R) (
met
a-ev
alua
tion)
19
72
In-h
ouse
50.0
080
.70
1998
Glo
bal I
nteg
rate
d Pe
st M
anag
emen
t Fac
ility
1996
Ex
tern
al
- -
2001
Glo
bal W
ater
Par
tner
ship
19
96
Exte
rnal
0.
40
- 19
98
Soci
al D
evel
opm
ent
Post
-Con
flict
Fun
d 19
98
In-h
ouse
8.
00
4.18
20
02
FSE
Net
wor
k (2
pro
gram
s)
Fina
ncia
l Sec
tor A
sses
smen
t Pro
gram
(FSA
P)
1999
In
-hou
se
- -
Faci
lity
for F
inan
cial
Sec
tor S
treng
then
ing
2002
In
-hou
se
0.50
-
HD
N N
etw
ork
(11
prog
ram
s)
Ed
ucat
ion
Wor
ld L
inks
for D
evel
opm
ent (
Wor
LD)
1998
Jo
int w
ith
Wor
LD N
GO
0.
75
2000
Hea
lth
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e fo
r Res
earc
h
and
Trai
ning
in T
ropi
cal D
isea
ses
(TD
R)
1975
Ex
tern
al2.
50-
1998
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e of
Res
earc
h, D
evel
opm
ent,
an
d R
esea
rch
Trai
ning
in H
uman
Rep
rodu
ctio
n (H
RP)
19
88
Exte
rnal
2.00
-
Glo
bal M
icro
Nut
rient
Initi
ativ
e (G
MI)
1992
Ex
tern
al
1.20
-
2000
UN
AID
S 19
96
Exte
rnal
4.00
-
Glo
bal F
orum
for H
ealth
Res
earc
h 19
98
Exte
rnal
6.
93
-
Annex E 22
Pr
ogra
m
star
ted
(fisc
al y
ear)
Man
agem
ent
DG
F al
loca
tions
FY
02
($ m
illio
ns)
TF c
ontr
ibut
ions
FY
01
($ m
illio
ns)
Mos
t rec
ent
inde
pend
ent
eval
uatio
n R
oll B
ack
Mal
aria
19
99
Exte
rnal
1.
50
-
Stop
TB
1999
Ex
tern
al0.
70-
Glo
bal A
llianc
e fo
r Vac
cine
s an
d
Imm
uniz
atio
n (G
AVI)
2000
Exte
rnal
b -
Soci
al P
rote
ctio
n
Und
erst
andi
ng C
hild
ren’
s W
ork
c
2000
Exte
rnal
--
PREM
Net
wor
k (2
pro
gram
s)
Inte
grat
ed F
ram
ewor
k fo
r Tra
de
1997
In
-hou
se
0.50
2000
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent N
etw
ork
(GD
N)
1998
Ex
tern
al
4.70
PSI N
etw
ork
(6 p
rogr
ams)
Wat
er &
San
itatio
n Pr
ogra
m (W
SP)
1978
In
-hou
se
- 14
.13
1999
Ener
gy S
ecto
r Man
agem
ent
Assi
stan
ce P
rogr
am (E
SMAP
) 19
82
In-h
ouse
-5.
0320
00
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up to
Ass
ist t
he P
oore
st (C
GAP
) 19
96
In-h
ouse
7.
13
4.84
20
02
Info
rmat
ion
for D
evel
opm
ent (
Info
Dev
) 19
96
In-h
ouse
4.
00
2.60
20
02
Publ
ic-P
rivat
e In
frast
ruct
ure
Advi
sory
Fa
cilit
y (P
PIAF
) 20
00
In-h
ouse
2.50
10.9
0
The
Citi
es A
llianc
e 20
01
In-h
ouse
1.
70
3.28
20
02
23 Annex E
a W
hile
the
GEF
is p
hysi
cally
hou
sed
in a
Wor
ld B
ank
faci
lity
and
the
Ban
k is
trus
tee
of th
e G
EF T
rust
Fun
d, it
has
its o
wn
man
agem
ent s
truct
ure
that
is in
depe
nden
t of t
he B
ank’
s m
anag
emen
t. b G
AV
I rec
eive
d a
DG
F al
loca
tion
thro
ugh
the
Glo
bal F
orum
for H
ealth
Res
earc
h.
c Pa
ul B
aile
y of
ILO
is a
lso
goin
g to
pre
pare
a c
ase
stud
y on
ship
brea
king
. Th
is re
pres
ents
a p
rogr
am th
at is
cur
rent
ly b
eing
def
ined
and
that
add
ress
es a
num
ber o
f diff
eren
t is
sues
–lab
or st
anda
rds,
envi
ronm
enta
l sta
ndar
ds, s
afeg
uard
s, an
d in
tern
atio
nal t
rade
pol
icy.
Ann
ex F
. O
vers
ight
and
Man
agem
ent o
f Glo
bal P
rogr
ams
Pr
ogra
m
DG
F st
atus
In
- ho
use
Exte
rnal
or
gani
zatio
n Pr
ogra
m
man
ager
Ta
sk
man
ager
Sp
onso
ring
unit(
s)
ES
SD N
etw
ork
En
viro
nmen
t
1 C
ritic
al E
cosy
stem
Par
tner
ship
Fun
d W
indo
w 1
B N
o C
onse
rvat
ion
Inte
rnat
iona
l
Gon
zalo
Cas
tro/
Kers
tin C
anby
EN
V/R
DV
Fo
rest
Par
tner
ship
s Pr
ogra
m
Win
dow
2
ENV
2 Fo
rest
Allia
nce
for C
onse
rvat
ion
and
Sust
aina
ble
Use
W
indo
w 2
Ye
s Jo
int w
ith W
orld
Wild
life
Fede
ratio
n C
hris
tian
Pete
r
ENV
3 Fo
rest
Tre
nds
Win
dow
2
No
Fore
st T
rend
s M
icha
el J
enki
ns
Dav
id C
asse
lls
ENV
4 Pr
ogra
m o
n Fo
rest
s (P
RO
FOR
II)
Win
dow
2
Yes
D
avid
Cas
sells
ENV
5 Th
e G
loba
l Mec
hani
sm to
Com
bat
Des
ertif
icat
ion
Win
dow
2
No
IFAD
Pe
r Ryd
an
Enos
Esi
kuri
ENV
6 M
illenn
ium
Eco
syst
em A
sses
smen
t Ex
ited
FY01
No
ICLA
RM
Rob
ert W
atso
nES
DVP
7 C
olla
bora
tive
Partn
ersh
ip o
n Fo
rest
s no
n-D
GF
No
UN
FF
D
avid
Cas
sells
EN
V
8 G
loba
l Env
ironm
ent F
acilit
y no
n-D
GF
No
GEF
M
oham
ed T
. El-A
shry
La
rs V
idae
us
ENVG
M
9 In
tern
atio
nal C
oral
Ree
f Ini
tiativ
e no
n-D
GF
No
Philip
pine
s D
ept.
of E
nv. &
Nat
. R
esou
rces
and
Sto
ckho
lm
Inte
rnat
'l W
ater
Inst
itute
(Sw
eden
)
Mar
ia H
atzi
olos
ENV
10
Mul
tilat
eral
Fun
d fo
r the
Impl
e-m
enta
tion
of th
e M
ontre
al P
roto
col
non-
DG
F
No
UN
EPLa
rs V
idae
usEN
VGM
11
Prot
otyp
e C
arbo
n Fu
nd
non-
DG
F Ye
s*
Ke
n N
ewco
mbe
ENVC
F
R
ural
Dev
elop
men
t
12
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up o
n In
tern
atio
nal
Agric
ultu
ral R
esea
rch
Win
dow
1A
Yes*
Fran
cisc
o R
eifs
chne
ider
Kevi
n C
leav
er (c
o-sp
onso
r rep
rese
ntat
ive)
an
d Sh
awki
Bar
ghou
ti (ta
sk m
anag
er)
RD
V
13
Glo
bal W
ater
Par
tner
ship
Ex
iting
FY0
2 N
o G
WP
Khal
id M
ohta
dulla
h Jo
hn B
risco
e R
DV
14
The
Wor
ld C
omm
issi
on o
n D
ams
Exite
d FY
01
No
IUC
N
Jo
hn B
risco
e R
DV
Annex F 24
Pr
ogra
m
DG
F st
atus
In
- ho
use
Exte
rnal
or
gani
zatio
n Pr
ogra
m
man
ager
Ta
sk
man
ager
Sp
onso
ring
unit(
s)
15
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g fo
r Tra
de P
olic
y,
Stra
tegy
Dev
elop
men
t and
WTO
N
egot
iatio
ns
non-
DG
F Ye
s
Mer
linda
Dad
or In
gco
R
DV
16
Com
mod
ity P
rice
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t Pr
ojec
t no
n-D
GF
Ye
s*Jo
hn N
ash
RD
V
17
Feed
ing
Min
ds, F
ight
ing
Hun
ger
non-
DG
F N
o W
orld
Foo
d D
ay U
SA
Ly
nn B
row
n R
DV
18
Glo
bal I
nteg
rate
d Pe
st M
anag
emen
t Fa
cilit
y
non-
DG
F
No
FAO
Eija
Peh
uR
DV
19
The
Popu
lar C
oalit
ion
to E
radi
cate
H
unge
r and
Pov
erty
no
n-D
GF
No
IFAD
John
Bru
ce (L
EGEN
) R
DV
So
cial
Dev
elop
men
t
20
Smal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
W
indo
w 1
B Ye
s
Willi
am R
eube
n/ Y
umi
Sera
SD
V
21
Post
-Con
flict
Fun
d W
indo
w 1
B Ye
s
Col
in S
cott
SD
VPC
22
Inte
rnat
iona
l For
um o
n C
apac
ity
Build
ing
non-
DG
F N
o AL
OP
(Cos
ta R
ica)
Naj
ma
Sidd
iqi
SDV
23
PRSP
Act
ion
Lear
ning
Pro
gram
no
n-D
GF
Yes
Pa
rmes
h Sh
ah
Judi
th E
dstro
m
SDV
FSE
24
Faci
lity
for F
inan
cial
Sec
tor
Stre
ngth
enin
g W
indo
w 2
Ye
s
M
arge
ry W
axm
an
BFR
25
The
Toro
nto
Inte
rnat
iona
l Lea
ders
hip
Cen
tre fo
r Fin
anci
al S
ecto
r Sup
ervi
sion
Ex
ited
FY00
N
o Yo
rk U
nive
rsity
Bus
ines
s Sc
hool
Dav
id S
cott
BFR
26
Fina
ncia
l Sec
tor A
sses
smen
t Pro
gram
no
n-D
GF
Yes
Join
t with
IMF
Susa
n M
arcu
s La
rry P
rom
isel
FS
P
27
Fina
ncia
l Sta
bilit
y Fo
rum
no
n-D
GF
No
BIS
Svei
n An
dres
en
Larry
Pro
mis
el
FSP
H
DN
Net
wor
k
Ed
ucat
ion
G
loba
l Dev
elop
men
t Net
wor
k,
Educ
atio
n R
esea
rch
Com
pone
nt
Win
dow
2
No
GD
N
Lynn
Squ
ire
Eliz
abet
h Ki
ng
HD
NED
/DEC
RG
28
The
Partn
ersh
ip fo
r Chi
ld D
evel
opm
ent
Win
dow
2
No
St. M
ary'
s M
edic
al S
choo
l (L
ondo
n)
Lesl
ey D
rake
(C
oord
inat
or)
Don
ald
Bund
y H
DN
ED
25 Annex F
Pr
ogra
m
DG
F st
atus
In
- ho
use
Exte
rnal
or
gani
zatio
n Pr
ogra
m
man
ager
Ta
sk
man
ager
Sp
onso
ring
unit(
s)
Pr
ogra
m fo
r Edu
catio
n St
atis
tics
Win
dow
2
Ja
mes
Soc
knat
(E
CSH
D)
HD
NED
29
UN
ESC
O In
stitu
te fo
r Sta
tistic
s W
indo
w 2
N
o U
NES
CO
D
enis
e Li
eves
ley
(Exe
cutiv
e D
irect
or, U
IS)
Jam
es S
ockn
at
(EC
SHD
) H
DN
ED
30
OEC
D W
orld
Edu
catio
n In
dica
tors
Pr
ogra
m
Win
dow
2
No
OEC
D
Den
ise
Liev
esle
y (U
IS)
and
Andr
eas
Schl
eich
er
(OEC
D)
Jam
es S
ockn
at
(EC
SHD
) H
DN
ED
Pr
ogra
m fo
r the
Ass
essm
ent o
f Stu
dent
Ac
hiev
emen
t W
indo
w 2
Vinc
ent G
rean
ey
HD
NED
31
Tren
ds in
Mat
hem
atic
s an
d Sc
ienc
e Ac
hiev
emen
t Aro
und
the
Wor
ld
Win
dow
2
No
Bost
on C
olle
ge
Han
s W
agem
aker
(E
xecu
tive
Dire
ctor
, IEA
)
Vinc
ent G
rean
ey
(SAS
HD
), Li
anqi
n W
ang
(HD
NED
)H
DN
ED
32
Prog
ress
in In
tern
atio
nal R
eadi
ng
Lite
racy
Stu
dy
Win
dow
2
No
Bost
on C
olle
ge
Han
s W
agem
aker
(E
xecu
tive
Dire
ctor
, IEA
)Vi
ncen
t Gre
aney
(S
ASH
D)
HD
NED
33
Wor
ld L
inks
W
indo
w 2
Ye
s Jo
int w
ith W
orLD
Sa
m C
arls
on
(Exe
cutiv
e D
irect
or)
Rob
ert H
awki
ns
HD
NED
/WBI
HD
34
Focu
sing
Res
ourc
es o
n Ef
fect
ive
Scho
ol H
ealth
no
n-D
GF
N
oSt
. Mar
y's
Med
ical
Sch
ool
(Lon
don)
A co
nsor
tium
of d
onor
s an
d ot
her a
genc
ies;
do
es n
ot h
ave
a pr
ogra
m
man
ager
Don
ald
Bund
y H
DN
ED
H
ealth
, Nut
ritio
n &
Po
pula
tion
35
Cen
tre o
f Exc
elle
nce
for N
utrit
ion,
In
tern
atio
nal C
ente
r for
Dia
rrhea
l D
isea
se R
esea
rch,
Ban
glad
esh
Exite
d FY
01
No
ICD
DR
(Ban
glad
esh)
Ras
hmi S
harm
a (S
ASH
D)
HD
NH
E
36
Glo
bal F
orum
for H
ealth
Res
earc
h W
indo
w 1
B N
o G
loba
l For
um fo
r Hea
lth R
esea
rch
Loui
s C
urra
t M
aure
en L
aw (E
ASH
D)
HD
NH
E
C
hild
hood
Illn
ess
Win
dow
1B
No
Mau
reen
Law
(EAS
HD
)/ M
aria
m C
laes
on
HD
NH
E
37
Glo
bal A
llianc
e fo
r Vac
cine
s an
d Im
mun
izat
ion
Win
dow
1B
No
GAV
I To
re G
odal
Am
ie B
atso
n H
DN
HE
IN
DEP
TH H
ealth
Sur
veilla
nce
and
Expe
rimen
tal N
etw
ork
Win
dow
1B
No
F.
Bin
ka
Dav
idso
n G
wat
kin
HD
NH
E
Th
e In
tern
atio
nal A
IDS
Vacc
ine
Initi
ativ
e W
indo
w 1
B N
o
Seth
Ber
kele
y Am
ie B
atso
n H
DN
HE
M
edic
ines
for M
alar
ia V
entu
re
Win
dow
1B
N
oR
ober
tRid
ley
Mau
reen
Law
/ O
k Pa
nnen
borg
(AFT
H4)
HD
NH
E
38
Glo
bal M
icro
nutri
ent I
nitia
tive
Exiti
ng F
Y02
No
GM
I
Mild
red
McL
achl
an/
Judi
th M
cGui
re
HD
NH
E
Annex F 26
Pr
ogra
m
In-
hous
e Ex
tern
al
orga
niza
tion
Prog
ram
m
anag
er
Task
m
anag
er
Spon
sorin
g un
it(s)
D
GF
stat
us
39
Popu
latio
n an
d R
epro
duct
ive
Hea
lth
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g Pr
ogra
m (P
RH
) W
indo
w 1
B Ye
s
Jane
t Nas
sim
HD
NH
E
40
Rol
l Bac
k M
alar
ia
Win
dow
2
No
WH
O
Dav
id A
lnw
ick
Ok
Pann
enbo
rg (A
FTH
4)H
DN
HE
41
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e fo
r Res
earc
h an
d Tr
aini
ng in
Tro
pica
l Dis
ease
s (T
DR
) W
indo
w 1
A N
o W
HO
C
arlo
s M
orel
Be
rnha
rd L
iese
(AFT
HD
)H
DN
HE
42
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e of
Res
earc
h,
Dev
elop
men
t & R
esea
rch
Trai
ning
in
Hum
an R
epro
duct
ion
(HR
P)
Win
dow
1A
No
WH
O
Paul
Van
Loo
k Kh
ama
Rog
o (A
FTH
3)/
Eliz
abet
h Lu
le/
Jane
t Nas
sim
H
DN
HE
43
Stop
TB
Win
dow
2
No
WH
O
J. W
. Lee
C
hris
Lov
elac
e/
Dia
na W
eil
HD
NH
E
44
U.N
. Adm
inis
trativ
e an
d C
oord
inat
ing
Com
mitt
ee, S
ub-C
omm
ittee
on
Nut
ritio
n Ex
ited
FY99
N
o U
.N. (
Gen
eva)
Mild
red
McL
achl
an
HD
NH
E
45
UN
AID
S (J
oint
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
Pr
ogra
mm
e on
HIV
/AID
S)
Win
dow
1B
No
UN
AID
S Pe
ter P
iot
Deb
rew
ork
Zew
die
(AFR
HV)
H
DN
HE
46
Com
mis
sion
on
Mac
roec
onom
ics
and
Hea
lth
non-
DG
F
No
WH
OJe
ffrey
Sac
hsC
hris
Lov
elac
e/ S
usan
St
out
HD
NH
E
47
Lym
phat
ic F
iliaria
sis
non-
DG
F Ye
s
Bern
hard
Lie
se (A
FTH
D)
H
DN
HE
So
cial
Pro
tect
ion
48
Soci
al P
rote
ctio
n fo
r the
Info
rmal
Ec
onom
y no
n-D
GF
Yes
Gor
don
Betc
herm
anH
DN
SP (S
ocia
l Pr
otec
tion)
49
Und
erst
andi
ng C
hild
ren'
s W
ork
non-
DG
F N
o U
NIC
EF
Furio
Ros
ati
Amit
Dar
H
DN
SP
IS
G (I
nfor
mat
ion
Solu
tions
G
roup
)
50
Dev
elop
men
t Gat
eway
Fou
ndat
ion
Win
dow
2
Yes*
Car
los
Brag
a
ISG
IF
27 Annex F
Pr
ogra
m
DG
F st
atus
In
- ho
use
Exte
rnal
or
gani
zatio
n Pr
ogra
m
man
ager
Ta
sk
man
ager
Sp
onso
ring
unit(
s)
PR
EM N
etw
ork
51
Forg
ing
Partn
ersh
ips
for G
ood
Gov
erna
nce
in P
ublic
Exp
endi
ture
and
R
ecor
ds M
anag
emen
t W
indo
w 2
Ye
s PE
FA S
ecre
taria
t, In
tern
atio
nal
Rec
ords
Man
agem
ent T
rust
C
hery
lGra
yPR
MPS
52
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent N
etw
ork
Win
dow
1B
No
GD
N
Lynn
Squ
ire
Ines
Gar
cia-
Thou
mi
DEC
VP
53
Inte
grat
ed F
ram
ewor
k fo
r Tra
de
Win
dow
2
Yes
Be
rnar
d H
oekm
an
D
ECPG
54
Partn
ersh
ips
in S
tatis
tics
for t
he 2
1st
Cen
tury
(PAR
IS-2
1)
Exiti
ng F
Y02
No
OEC
D
Anto
ine
Sim
onpi
etri
Mis
ha B
elki
ndas
DEC
DG
55
DAC
Net
wor
k on
Goo
d G
over
nanc
e an
d C
apac
ity D
evel
opm
ent (
GO
VNET
) no
n-D
GF
No
OEC
D
Mas
sim
o To
mm
asol
i N
ick
Man
ning
PR
MPS
PS
I Net
wor
k
56
Busi
ness
Par
tner
s fo
r Dev
elop
men
t (B
PD)
Exiti
ng F
Y02
No
Civ
icus
and
Prin
ce o
f Wal
es
Busi
ness
Lea
ders
For
um
Laur
ie R
egel
brug
ge a
nd
Ros
Ten
nyso
n N
igel
Tw
ose
BPG
BP
D -
Glo
bal P
artn
ersh
ip fo
r You
th
Dev
elop
men
t Ex
ited
FY01
N
o In
tern
atio
nal Y
outh
Fou
ndat
ion
Aaro
n W
illiam
s
BPG
BP
D -
Nat
ural
Res
ourc
es C
lust
er
Exite
d FY
01
No
CAR
E In
tern
atio
nal
Mic
hael
War
ner
BP
D -
Glo
bal R
oad
Safe
ty P
artn
ersh
ip
Exiti
ng F
Y02
No
IFR
C
Bret
t Biv
ans
TU
D
BP
D -
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
Clu
ster
Ex
ited
FY01
N
o W
ater
Aid
Ken
Cap
lan
EW
D
57
Citi
es A
llianc
e W
indo
w 2
Ye
s*
Mar
k H
ildeb
rand
TUD
58
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up to
Ass
ist t
he
Poor
est
Win
dow
1A
Yes*
Eliz
abet
h Li
ttlef
ield
C
arlo
s C
ueva
sFS
D
59
Glo
bal C
orpo
rate
Gov
erna
nce
Foru
m
Win
dow
2
Yes*
Anne
Sim
pson
O
livie
r Fre
mon
d PS
ACG
60
The
Info
rmat
ion
for D
evel
opm
ent
Prog
ram
(inf
oDev
) W
indo
w 1
B Ye
s*
Br
uno
Lanv
in
C
IT
61
Prov
entio
n C
onso
rtium
W
indo
w 2
Ye
s
Alci
ra I.
Kre
imer
TUD
62
Publ
ic-P
rivat
e In
frast
ruct
ure
Advi
sory
Fa
cilit
y W
indo
w 2
Ye
s*
R
usse
ll M
uir
War
rick
Smith
PS
APP
63
Sola
r Dev
elop
men
t Gro
up
Win
dow
2
No
Trid
os P
V Pa
rtner
s (A
rling
ton,
VA)
C
anda
ce S
mith
R
icha
rd J
erem
y Sp
ence
rEW
D
64
Col
labo
rativ
e G
roup
on
Artis
anal
and
Sm
all-S
cale
Min
ing
non-
DG
F Ye
s
Got
thar
d W
alse
r Pe
ter v
an d
er V
een
CM
NPO
Annex F 28
Pr
ogra
m
DG
F st
atus
In
- ho
use
Exte
rnal
or
gani
zatio
n Pr
ogra
m
man
ager
Ta
sk
man
ager
Sp
onso
ring
unit(
s)
65
Dig
ital O
ppor
tuni
ty T
ask
(DO
T) F
orce
no
n-D
GF
Yes
Jo
int w
ith U
ND
P Br
uno
Lanv
in
C
IT
60
Ener
gy S
ecto
r Man
agem
ent A
ssis
tanc
e Pr
ogra
mm
e no
n-D
GF
Yes*
Dom
iniq
ue M
. Lal
lem
ent
EW
D
67
Fore
ign
Inve
stm
ent A
dvis
ory
Serv
ice
non-
DG
F Ye
s*
Jo
e Ba
ttat
PS
ADR
68
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
Prog
ram
no
n-D
GF
Yes*
Wal
ter S
tottm
an
EW
D
W
BI
69
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent L
earn
ing
Net
wor
k no
n-D
GF
Yes
Jo
an H
ubba
rd
W
BIG
L
70
The
Glo
bal K
now
ledg
e Pa
rtner
ship
no
n-D
GF
No
Gov
ernm
ent o
f Mal
aysi
a R
inal
ia A
bdul
Rah
im
Joan
Hub
bard
W
BIG
L
29 Annex F
Annex G 30
Annex G. Funding of Global Programs Donor funding of global programs comes from four major sources: the Bank’s administrative budget, the Development Grant Facility (DGF), Bank-administered trust funds, and other donor co-financing (that does not flow through trust funds).16 In addition, the Bank (and other donors) spends resources on oversight (in the Bank’s case by VPs, directors, and managers) that are generally not recorded as part of the each program’s budgetary expenditures.
Of the 70 programs, 43 have received grants from the DGF during the last five years (FY98 to FY02), amounting to $119.60 million in FY01 and $119.53 million in FY02. Of these 43 programs, the 26 programs that were managed entirely outside the Bank received grants of $32.75 million in FY01 and $32.66 million in FY02. The remaining 17 programs that were managed entirely or partially inside the Bank received grants of $86.85 million and $86.87 million in those years.17
Data on trust fund contributions and disbursements is presently incomplete.18 About 27 programs utilized Bank-administered trust funds of approximately $500 million in FY01. Of these, 19 programs are managed inside the Bank, and 12 of these also received DGF grants. The overall picture is dominated by two programs–the GEF (which is managed outside the Bank although housed in a Bank building, but whose trust fund is managed by the Bank), which utilized $354 million in FY01, and the CGIAR (which is managed inside the Bank), which utilized $84 million in FY01. Global programs primarily utilized programmatic trust funds that were established for the exclusive use of the particular program, but some global programs drew upon sector/thematic trust funds that were not reserved for the exclusive use of a single program.
Data on World Bank’s administrative budget (BB) contributions to global programs are even more incomplete. There is presently no centralized tracking of BB expenditures by global programs, nor has it proven possible to construct such data even for the most recent year, FY01, from SAP—the Bank’s financial management system.19 However, it is possible to say the following:
• BB expenditures on each of the 26 DGF-supported programs that is managed outside the Bank appear to be small, say, less than $100,000 a year for each program—mostly for the task manager’s time and travel expenditures for oversight and liaison with the program.
• Of the other 17 DGF-supported programs, the DGF grant covered all or most in-secretariat costs for 8 programs in FY01, the Bank provided additional BB of about $10 million for 6 programs,20 and the remaining 3 programs are new in FY02.
16. Other, smaller sources of funding include in-kind contributions (such as office space, staff exchanges, and secondments) and contributions of clients, participants, and beneficiaries.
17. This includes the Forest Alliance (which is managed jointly by the Bank and WWF), the Global Development Network and Provention (which are in the process of moving outside the Bank), World Links (part of which is managed by WBI), and the Development Gateway (for which the Bank has a management contract with the Development Gateway Foundation).
18. TFO manages a database on trust fund contributions since FY97 and disbursements since FY00. While broadly accurate, these do not reconcile completely with TM reports and with SAP.
19. SAP does not assign a code or a flag to global programs, making it impossible to track or aggregate all expenditures by global programs. While some global programs are their own cost centers, others are managed as part of a larger cost center and therefore consist only of a number of budget lines and internal orders. BB expenditures on the program by other units are especially difficult to track.
20. The WWF/World Bank Forest Alliance, World Links, Development Gateway, Global Development Network, infoDev, and the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility.
31 Annex G
• For the GEF, the Montreal Protocol, and the Prototype Carbon Fund, while the Bank provides a BB allocation at the beginning of the year, these expenditures are reimbursed from trust funds.
• Of the remaining 24 DGF programs, BB expenditures on the 12 programs that are managed outside the Bank are once again small, since the Bank makes no contribution to the program beyond the task manager’s time and travel expenditures.
• Of the remaining 12 programs that are managed inside the Bank, 2 are new in FY02, one is a large program supported entirely by BB,21 one is a large program supported mostly by BB,22 three are large programs supported mostly by trust funds,23 and the final five are small programs of under $1 million in FY01.
Overall, excluding the time spent by VPs, Directors, and Division managers on governance and oversight, the Bank probably spent about $30 million plus or minus $5 million in FY01. In accordance with OP 8.45 on grant-making, one presumes that these BB expenditures were spent entirely on program administration (for in-house programs), staff time, and travel. With few exceptions, OP 8.45 excludes making grants from BB allocations, except for BB allocations that come from the DGF.24
As shown in the table, about $2 million of the $30 million of BB expenditures came from the President’s Contingency Fund in FY01. This contributed to the activities of three internally managed programs—the Development Gateway, the Global Development Learning Network, and World Links. On the face of it, the previous year’s allocation of $1.5 million to the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund—an externally managed program—was a violation of OP 8.45.
Overall, the Bank is contributing about $150 million to global programs ($120 million through the DGF and $30 million additional BB) and disbursing about $500 million from Bank-administered trust funds. The Bank’s share of the total donor expenditures on the 70 global programs is impossible to calculate accurately due to lack of complete information on co-financing and in-kind contributions from other donors that are not channeled through Bank-administered trust funds.
Table Allocations from the President’s Contingency Fund to Global Programs (thousands of US dollars)
FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund 1,500.0 Development Gateway 1,117.0 1,000.0 Global Development Learning Network 450.0 Information for Development (infoDev) 500.0 World Links 500.0 500.0 Total allocations to global programs 500.0 0.0 0.0 3,117.0 1,950.0 Percent of total Contingency Fund allocations 5.2% 0.0% 0.0% 25.9% 12.6% Total Contingency Fund allocations 9,633.0 14,152.2 12,466.3 12,030.2 15,489.5
21. Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP).
22. Global Development Learning Network (GDLN).
23. The Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), the Forest Investment Advisory Service (FIAS), and the Water and Sanitation Program (WSP).
24. The exceptions listed in OP 8.45 are the Development Marketplace, the PSD Exchange, and the Research Support Budget. The DGF is part of the gross, but not the net administrative budget of the Bank.
Ann
ex H
. Obj
ectiv
es, A
ctiv
ities
, Out
puts
, Out
com
es, a
nd E
xit S
trat
egie
s of G
loba
l Pro
gram
s
Prog
ram
Pr
ogra
m o
bjec
tives
Pr
ogra
m a
ctiv
ities
O
utpu
ts a
nd o
utco
mes
Ex
it st
rate
gy
ENVI
RO
NM
ENT
– D
GF
1 C
ritic
al E
cosy
stem
Pa
rtner
ship
Fun
d To
pro
vide
stra
tegi
c as
sist
ance
to
non-
gove
rnm
enta
l and
priv
ate
sect
or o
rgan
izat
ions
, for
the
prot
ectio
n of
vita
l eco
syst
ems
in
IBR
D a
nd ID
A m
embe
r cou
ntrie
s th
at h
ave
ratif
ied
the
Con
vent
ion
of
Biol
ogic
al D
iver
sity
and
are
list
ed a
s pr
iorit
y bi
odiv
ersi
ty h
otsp
ots
by th
e C
EPF.
Ope
ratio
naliz
e C
EPF
with
in
Con
serv
atio
n In
tern
atio
nal;
Initi
ate
cons
ulta
tion
abou
t the
Fun
d w
ith th
e In
tern
atio
nal N
GO
com
mun
ity a
nd
pote
ntia
l don
ors;
Pre
pare
Ec
osys
tem
Pro
files
and
Inve
stm
ent
Stra
tegi
es fo
r eac
h ho
tspo
t; Fi
nanc
ing
of p
roje
cts
pres
ente
d by
lo
cal a
ctor
s th
at m
eet t
he o
bjec
tives
of
the
ecos
yste
m p
rofil
es;
Mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
of re
sults
.
Dev
elop
men
t and
mai
nten
ance
of a
kn
owle
dge
man
agem
ent s
yste
m to
tra
ck a
nd d
isse
min
ate
appr
opria
te
info
rmat
ion
gath
ered
from
eac
h gr
ant
proj
ect a
nd to
sha
re e
cosy
stem
in
form
atio
n w
ith g
rant
ees
and
othe
r in
tere
sted
par
ties.
The
suc
cess
ful
perfo
rman
ce o
f the
CEP
F on
line
gran
t-mak
ing
syst
em a
s a
mec
hani
sm
to re
ceiv
e an
d tra
ck g
rant
app
licat
ions
, fin
anci
al a
nd p
rogr
ess
repo
rts, a
nd to
fa
cilit
ate
the
shar
ing
of e
cosy
stem
in
form
atio
n. F
ive
prof
iles
and
inve
stm
ent s
trate
gies
com
plet
ed fo
r ec
osys
tem
s ap
prov
ed b
y th
e D
onor
co
unci
l
The
Mem
oran
dum
of U
nder
stan
ding
is
effe
ctiv
e fo
r fiv
e ye
ars.
The
Fi
nanc
ing
Agre
emen
t for
the
Fund
re
mai
ns in
effe
ct u
ntil
thirt
y da
ys
afte
r del
iver
y of
a fi
nal r
epor
t, w
hich
is
due
Jun
e 30
, 200
6, o
r suc
h la
ter
date
as
the
Don
or C
ounc
il m
ay
dete
rmin
e th
at c
ontin
uatio
n of
pr
ogra
m b
eyon
d th
is ti
mef
ram
e is
ne
cess
ary.
2 Fo
rest
Allia
nce
for
Con
serv
atio
n an
d Su
stai
nabl
e U
se
Sign
ifica
ntly
redu
ce th
e lo
ss a
nd
degr
adat
ion
of a
ll fo
rest
type
s w
orld
wid
e. T
he A
llianc
e w
ill w
ork
tow
ard
this
goa
l by
prom
otin
g fo
rest
co
nser
vatio
n an
d in
tern
atio
nally
re
cogn
ized
bes
t pra
ctic
es in
fore
st
man
agem
ent.
Build
ing
partn
ersh
ips;
Res
earc
h an
d an
alys
is; L
earn
ing,
Cap
acity
Bu
ildin
g An
d C
omm
unic
atio
ns
In te
rms
of c
onse
rvat
ion
and
fore
st
prot
ectio
n, th
e Al
lianc
e ha
s fo
cuse
d on
thre
e hi
gh p
rofil
e an
d cr
itica
l pl
aces
. The
Bra
zil ‘
s Am
azon
Bas
in,
the
Con
go B
asin
, and
Rus
sia.
Th
e Al
lianc
e is
wor
king
with
par
tner
s in
all
thes
e pl
aces
to b
ring
abou
t co
mm
itmen
t and
cha
nge
at th
e sc
ale
requ
ired
by th
e ta
rget
s.
The
WB/
WW
F Al
lianc
e is
cur
rent
ly
deve
lopi
ng a
med
ium
term
stra
tegy
an
d w
ork
prog
ram
for t
he p
erio
d FY
02 to
FY0
5. T
his
will
be u
sed
as
a fu
ndra
isin
g do
cum
ent f
or
appr
oach
ing
vario
us g
over
nmen
ts,
Trus
t Fun
d do
nors
and
priv
ate
foun
datio
ns. U
nder
the
assu
mpt
ion
that
this
is s
ucce
ssfu
l we
can
envi
sage
pha
sing
out
DG
F af
ter
FY03
.
3 Fo
rest
Tre
nds
The
mis
sion
of F
ores
t Tre
nds
is to
m
aint
ain
and
rest
ore
fore
st
ecos
yste
ms
by p
rom
otin
g in
cent
ives
th
at d
iver
sify
trad
e in
the
fore
st
sect
or, m
ovin
g be
yond
exc
lusi
ve
focu
s on
lum
ber a
nd fi
ber t
o a
broa
der r
ange
of p
rodu
cts
and
serv
ices
.
Incr
ease
pro
mot
ion
of fo
rest
m
anag
emen
t pra
ctic
es th
at
sign
ifica
ntly
redu
ce n
egat
ive
envi
ronm
enta
l and
soc
ial i
mpa
cts;
Su
ppor
t val
ue c
hain
effi
cien
cies
; al
tern
ativ
es to
virg
in w
ood
fiber
from
na
tura
l for
ests
; and
the
redu
ctio
n of
ov
eral
l con
sum
ptio
n; S
uppo
rt an
d pr
omot
e m
arke
ts fo
r eco
syst
em
serv
ices
.
Org
aniz
e an
d pr
oduc
e: (i
) ana
lytic
pi
eces
on
vario
us to
pics
with
in th
e fo
rest
sec
tor;
(ii) C
ase
stud
ies;
a
stud
y ex
amin
ing
the
inte
ract
ion
betw
een
tenu
re, f
ores
ts, a
nd
com
mun
ity li
velih
oods
; (iii)
A m
ajor
ga
ther
ing
to d
iscu
ss in
tern
atio
nal
fore
stry
tren
ds; (
iv) T
he c
reat
ion
and
mai
nten
ance
of a
web
site
.
For F
ores
t Tre
nds
it is
exp
ecte
d th
at
with
stro
ng c
o-fin
anci
ng, t
he ra
tio o
f D
GF
fund
s ar
e ex
pect
ed to
pha
se
out i
n FY
03.
4 Pr
ogra
m o
n Fo
rest
s (P
RO
FOR
II)
Annex H 32
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
5
The
Glo
bal M
echa
nism
to
Com
bat
Des
ertif
icat
ion
The
over
all o
bjec
tive
of th
e G
M, a
s st
ated
in T
he k
ey o
bjec
tives
of t
he
prog
ram
are
: 1) s
uppo
rt to
Nat
iona
l Ac
tion
Prog
ram
s to
com
bat
dese
rtific
atio
n, 2
) sup
port
to S
ub-
Reg
iona
l Act
ion
Prog
ram
s to
co
mba
t des
ertif
icat
ion
3) s
uppo
rt to
R
egio
nal A
ctio
n Pr
ogra
ms
(so
far
reso
urce
s ha
ve b
een
used
to
supp
ort t
he d
evel
opm
ent a
nd
laun
chin
g of
The
mat
ic P
rogr
am
Net
wor
k nu
mbe
r 4 (T
PN4)
whi
ch is
fo
cusi
ng o
n W
ater
Res
ourc
es
Man
agem
ent f
or A
gric
ultu
re in
D
ryla
nds)
.
Activ
ities
are
orie
nted
tow
ards
Su
ppor
ting
Actio
n Pr
ogra
mm
ing
Nat
iona
l Lev
el
Sub-
regi
onal
& R
egio
nal L
evel
s En
ablin
g Ac
tiviti
es
Com
mun
ity B
ased
trai
ning
&
prog
ram
min
g D
eser
tific
atio
n m
onito
ring
Stra
tegi
c in
itiat
ives
In
tegr
ated
Lan
d &
Wat
er In
itiat
ive
Soil
Ferti
lity
Initi
ativ
e C
arbo
n Se
ques
tratio
n D
ebt R
elie
f In
form
atio
n &
Com
mun
icat
ion
C
omm
unic
atio
n St
rate
gy
Info
rmat
ion
Serv
ices
Iden
tifyi
ng a
nd p
rom
otin
g br
oad
mea
sure
s an
d ac
tions
Opt
imiz
ing
the
use,
effe
ctiv
enes
s an
d ef
ficie
ncy
of
exis
ting
reso
urce
s; S
uppo
rt pr
ojec
t id
entif
icat
ion,
mis
sion
s ro
undt
able
m
eetin
gs a
nd a
dapt
ing
loca
l de
velo
pmen
t met
hodo
logi
es in
pr
ojec
t act
iviti
es; P
rovi
de te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce a
nd fi
nanc
ial s
uppo
rt to
m
embe
r cou
ntrie
s; a
nd R
epor
t and
pr
ovid
e ad
vice
to th
e C
onfe
renc
e of
Pa
rties
(CO
P) o
n is
sues
rela
ted
to
fund
ing
of C
CD
impl
emen
tatio
n.
Proj
ect a
ctiv
ities
are
exp
ecte
d to
ru
n fro
m J
uly
2000
to J
une
2002
. Th
e gr
ant w
ill ha
ve a
cat
alyt
ic ro
le
in g
ener
atin
g ot
her d
onor
s’ a
nd
affe
cted
cou
ntry
fund
s th
at w
ill fo
rm
the
basi
s fo
r im
plem
entin
g th
e C
CD
. It
is p
ossi
ble
that
add
ition
al fu
ndin
g m
ay b
e re
ques
ted
beyo
nd th
e cu
rrent
DG
F al
loca
tion.
G
M’s
cor
e bu
dget
is fi
nanc
ed b
y as
sess
ed c
ontri
butio
ns fr
om c
ount
ry
parti
es u
nder
a le
gally
bin
ding
in
tern
atio
nal c
onve
ntio
n, i.
e. th
e C
onve
ntio
n to
Com
bat
Des
ertif
icat
ion
unde
r the
aeg
is o
f th
e U
nite
d N
atio
ns.
6 M
illenn
ium
Eco
syst
em
Asse
ssm
ent
Scie
ntifi
c as
sess
men
t of t
he
cond
ition
of E
arth
’s e
cosy
stem
s,
pote
ntia
l im
pact
s of
cha
nges
to
ecos
yste
ms
on th
eir a
bilit
y to
mee
t hu
man
nee
ds, a
nd p
olic
ies,
te
chno
logi
es, a
nd to
ols
to im
prov
e ec
osys
tem
man
agem
ent.
The
MA
is d
esig
ned
to im
prov
e ec
onom
ic a
nd e
nviro
nmen
tal
deci
sion
s by
: im
prov
ing
the
info
rmat
ion
used
by
deci
sion
-m
aker
s an
d th
e pu
blic
; and
bui
ldin
g ca
paci
ty, p
artic
ular
ly in
dev
elop
ing
coun
tries
, to
unde
rtake
eco
syst
em
asse
ssm
ents
and
act
on
thei
r fin
ding
s.
A se
t of m
etho
dolo
gies
to p
erfo
rm
glob
al a
sses
smen
ts o
f eco
syst
em
cond
ition
, pla
usib
le fu
ture
s an
d re
spon
se m
easu
res;
a g
loba
l as
sess
men
t; a
set o
f pla
usib
le fu
ture
sc
enar
ios
of c
ondi
tions
, gov
erna
nce
stru
ctur
es a
nd e
cosy
stem
con
ditio
n;
an e
valu
atio
n of
resp
onse
mea
sure
s an
d be
st p
ract
ices
.
Ther
e is
a w
ell d
efin
ed e
xit s
trate
gy.
The
time
to d
esig
n, p
repa
re, p
eer-
revi
ew a
nd fi
naliz
e th
e M
A,
incl
udin
g on
goin
g co
mm
unic
atio
ns
of th
e pr
oces
s an
d re
sults
, is
four
ye
ars.
Hen
ce, t
he B
ank
and
othe
r co
-spo
nsor
s ar
e re
ques
ted
to fu
nd
the
MA
for f
our y
ears
. Ex
ited
from
DG
F in
FY0
1
33 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
ENVI
RO
NM
ENT
– N
ON
-DG
F
7 C
olla
bora
tive
Partn
ersh
ip o
n Fo
rest
s Th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f the
CPF
, as
a ne
w in
tern
atio
nal p
artn
ersh
ip o
n fo
rest
s, re
pres
ents
the
decl
ared
w
illing
ness
and
com
mitm
ent o
f the
C
PF m
embe
r org
aniz
atio
ns to
su
ppor
t the
wor
k of
the
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
For
um o
n Fo
rest
s (U
NFF
) an
d to
enh
ance
coo
pera
tion
and
coor
dina
tion
amon
g pa
rtner
s in
the
UN
FF-re
late
d ef
forts
. Th
e m
issi
on o
f the
CPF
is to
su
ppor
t the
wor
k of
the
UN
FF in
the
prom
otio
n of
the
man
agem
ent,
cons
erva
tion
and
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent o
f all
type
s of
fore
sts
and
in th
e st
reng
then
ing
of p
oliti
cal
com
mitm
ent t
o th
is e
nd.
-Fac
ilitat
e an
d pr
omot
e th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of In
tern
atio
nal
Pane
l on
Fore
sts/
Inte
rnat
iona
l Fo
rum
on
Fore
sts
IPF/
IFF
prop
osal
s fo
r act
ion
as w
ell a
s ot
her
actio
ns, i
nclu
ding
thro
ugh
natio
nal
fore
st p
rogr
ams;
and
cat
alyz
e,
mob
ilize
and
gene
rate
and
cha
nnel
fin
anci
al, t
echn
ical
and
sci
entif
ic
reso
urce
s to
this
end
. -P
rovi
de a
foru
m fo
r con
tinue
d po
licy
deve
lopm
ent a
nd d
ialo
gue
and
fost
er c
omm
on u
nder
stan
ding
of
sus
tain
able
fore
st m
anag
emen
t. -E
nhan
ce c
oope
ratio
n as
wel
l as
polic
y an
d pr
ogra
m c
oord
inat
ion
amon
g re
leva
nt in
tern
atio
nal a
nd
regi
onal
org
aniz
atio
ns, i
nstit
utio
ns
and
inst
rum
ents
. -F
oste
r int
erna
tiona
l and
cro
ss-
sect
oral
coo
pera
tion.
-M
onito
r, as
sess
and
repo
rt on
pr
ogre
ss.
-Stre
ngth
en p
oliti
cal c
omm
itmen
t.
The
prog
ram
cre
ates
a h
igh-
leve
l ne
twor
k of
mul
tilat
eral
s an
d na
tiona
l go
vern
men
ts to
wor
k co
llabo
rativ
ely
on th
e Im
plem
enta
tion
of fo
rest
-re
late
d po
licie
s an
d re
com
men
datio
ns o
f the
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
For
um o
n Fo
rest
s
Non
e.
8 G
loba
l Env
ironm
ent
Faci
lity
Esta
blis
h a
mec
hani
sm fo
r in
tern
atio
nal c
oope
ratio
n fo
r the
pu
rpos
e of
pro
vidi
ng n
ew a
nd
addi
tiona
l gra
nt a
nd c
once
ssio
nal
fund
ing
to m
eet t
he a
gree
d in
crem
enta
l cos
ts o
f mea
sure
s to
ac
hiev
e ag
reed
glo
bal b
enef
its in
th
e fo
llow
ing
foca
l are
as:
-Bio
dive
rsity
-C
limat
e C
hang
e -D
egra
datio
n of
Inte
rnat
iona
l Wat
ers
-Ozo
ne D
eple
tion
-Lan
d D
egra
datio
n
Impl
emen
tatio
n th
roug
h th
e th
ree
desi
gnat
ed a
genc
ies:
WB,
UN
DP
and
UN
EP o
f pro
gram
s an
d pr
ojec
ts
in B
iodi
vers
ity, C
limat
e C
hang
e,
Inte
rnat
iona
l Wat
ers,
Ozo
ne
Dep
letio
n, P
ersi
sten
t Org
anic
Po
lluta
nts,
and
Lan
d D
egra
datio
n.
Betw
een
1991
and
200
1, G
EF
allo
cate
d $1
,387
milli
on fo
r 470
pr
ojec
ts in
bio
dive
rsity
, $1,
271
milli
on
for 9
0 pr
ojec
ts in
clim
ate
chan
ge,
$462
milli
on fo
r 60
proj
ects
in
inte
rnat
iona
l wat
ers,
$16
7 m
illion
for
21 p
roje
cts
in o
zone
dep
letio
n, a
nd
$142
milli
on fo
r 19
proj
ects
in la
nd
degr
adat
ion.
The
se in
vest
men
ts
gene
rate
d co
finan
cing
of m
ore
than
$1
0.5
billio
n, m
ostly
in c
limat
e ch
ange
(abo
ut $
7 bi
llion)
and
bi
odiv
ersi
ty (m
ore
than
$2.
3 bi
llion)
.
Non
e.
Annex H 34
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
9
Inte
rnat
iona
l Cor
al
Ree
f Ini
tiativ
e To
impl
emen
t Cha
pter
17
of A
gend
a 21
, and
oth
er in
tern
atio
nal
Con
vent
ions
and
agr
eem
ents
for
the
bene
fit o
f cor
al re
efs
and
rela
ted
ecos
yste
ms.
The
Initi
ativ
e w
as
esta
blis
hed
in o
rder
to s
top
and
reve
rse
the
glob
al d
egra
datio
n of
co
ral r
eefs
and
rela
ted
ecos
yste
ms.
Focu
s gl
obal
atte
ntio
n on
the
decl
inin
g st
atus
of t
he w
orld
’s c
oral
re
efs
and
prom
ote
prac
tical
so
lutio
ns th
at m
ust b
e im
plem
ente
d to
reve
rse
this
dec
line;
Enc
oura
ge
oper
atio
nal n
etw
orks
to p
rom
ote
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
inte
grat
ed c
oast
al
zone
man
agem
ent,
build
ing
of
capa
city
; Pro
mot
e an
d ca
taly
ze th
e fu
ndin
g of
regi
onal
pro
gram
s;
Prom
ote
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f en
viro
nmen
tally
-sou
nd to
uris
m;
prom
ote
rese
arch
and
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g in
dev
elop
ing
coun
tries
; Pr
omot
e th
e fo
rmat
ion
of N
atio
nal
ICR
I Com
mitt
ees;
Mai
ntai
n th
e IC
RI
web
site
; and
pro
mot
e th
e de
velo
pmen
t of a
dat
abas
e of
pr
ojec
ts o
n co
ral r
eefs
Succ
essf
ul in
tegr
ated
man
agem
ent
thro
ugh
coor
dina
tion
and
linka
ges
to
othe
r pro
gram
s, in
itiat
ives
and
lega
l in
stru
men
ts. B
road
-bas
ed
stak
ehol
der p
artn
ersh
ips
and
com
mun
ity p
artic
ipat
ion
for e
ffect
ive
man
agem
ent a
nd th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
cultu
rally
sen
sitiv
e pr
oces
ses
of
empo
wer
men
t. In
crea
sed
publ
ic
awar
enes
s an
d ed
ucat
ion,
incl
udin
g ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing,
to h
ighl
ight
cor
al
reef
loss
and
deg
rada
tion
and
to
supp
ort e
ffect
ive
man
agem
ent.
Prov
isio
n of
dat
a an
d in
form
atio
n, in
ac
cess
ible
and
und
erst
anda
ble
form
s, a
nd fr
om a
wid
e ra
nge
of
sour
ces
to p
rom
ote
succ
essf
ul
man
agem
ent.
Non
e
10
Mul
tilat
eral
Fun
d fo
r th
e Im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
Mon
treal
Pro
toco
l
The
mai
n ob
ject
ive
of th
e M
LF is
to
assi
st d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es th
at a
re
party
to th
e M
ontre
al P
roto
col
who
se a
nnua
l per
cap
ita
cons
umpt
ion
and
prod
uctio
n of
OD
S is
less
than
0.3
kg
to c
ompl
y w
ith
the
cont
rol m
easu
res
of th
e Pr
otoc
ol. C
urre
ntly
, 130
of t
he 1
75
Parti
es to
the
Mon
treal
Pro
toco
l m
eet t
hese
crit
eria
. The
y ar
e re
ferre
d to
as
Artic
le 5
cou
ntrie
s.
Assi
st A
rticl
e 5
coun
tries
in
prep
arin
g co
untry
pro
gram
s,
feas
ibilit
y st
udie
s an
d pr
ojec
t pr
opos
als,
pro
vidi
ng te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce fo
r pro
ject
dev
elop
men
t an
d im
plem
enta
tion,
as
wel
l as
info
rmat
ion
diss
emin
atio
n.
Fund
ing
both
inve
stm
ent a
nd n
on-
inve
stm
ent p
roje
cts.
In
surin
g co
mpl
ianc
e by
all
Artic
le 5
co
untri
es.
Sust
aina
ble
OD
S ph
ase-
out t
hrou
gh
natio
nal e
xecu
tion;
Enh
ance
d an
d ac
cele
rate
d flo
w o
f tec
hnic
al
info
rmat
ion
to d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es
and
ente
rpris
es; D
evel
op C
ost-
effe
ctiv
e ph
ase-
out p
lans
for o
zone
de
plet
ing
subs
tanc
es.
Non
e.
35 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
11
Pr
otot
ype
Car
bon
Fund
Th
e PC
F ha
s th
ree
prim
ary
stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
: -D
emon
stra
te h
ow p
roje
ct-b
ased
Em
issi
on R
educ
tions
tran
sact
ions
ca
n pr
omot
e an
d co
ntrib
ute
to th
e su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t of
deve
lopi
ng c
ount
ries
and
coun
tries
w
ith e
cono
mie
s in
tran
sitio
n an
d lo
wer
the
cost
of c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
the
Kyot
o Pr
otoc
ol.
-Pro
vide
the
Parti
es to
the
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
Fra
mew
ork
Con
vent
ion
on
Clim
ate
Cha
nge,
the
priv
ate
sect
or,
and
othe
r int
eres
ted
parti
es w
ith a
n op
portu
nity
to “l
earn
by
doin
g” in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f pol
icie
s, ru
les
and
busi
ness
pro
cess
es fo
r the
ac
hiev
emen
t of e
mis
sion
s re
duct
ions
. -D
emon
stra
te th
e po
tent
ial f
or
publ
ic-p
rivat
e pa
rtner
ship
in
mob
ilizin
g ne
w re
sour
ces
for
addr
essi
ng g
loba
l env
ironm
enta
l pr
oble
ms
thro
ugh
mar
ket-b
ased
m
echa
nism
s.
The
PCF
proj
ects
that
it w
ill pr
oduc
e hi
gh q
ualit
y gr
eenh
ouse
gas
em
issi
on re
duct
ions
; Est
ablis
h va
rious
val
idat
ion,
ver
ifica
tion
and
certi
ficat
ion
proc
edur
es fo
r em
issi
ons
redu
ctio
ns; D
evel
op a
kn
owle
dge
base
of b
usin
ess
proc
esse
s an
d pr
actic
es e
arne
d.
PCF
was
laun
ched
in J
an. 2
000
and
has
soug
ht p
rivat
e an
d pu
blic
su
bscr
iptio
ns. A
t its
firs
t clo
sing
, six
co
untri
es a
nd 1
5 pr
ivat
e se
ctor
en
titie
s ag
reed
to p
ay $
10 m
illion
and
$5
milli
on re
spec
tivel
y to
par
ticip
ate
in th
e PC
F.
Wor
ld B
ank’
s Bo
ard
incr
ease
d th
e Fu
nd’s
max
imum
siz
e to
$18
0 m
illion
an
d ap
prov
ed a
dvan
cing
the
date
of
a se
cond
clo
sing
. At i
ts s
econ
d cl
osin
g, tw
o m
ore
priv
ate
sect
or
entit
ies
join
ed, b
ringi
ng th
e ca
pita
l of
the
fund
to $
145
milli
on.
As a
pilo
t act
ivity
, the
PC
F do
es n
ot
ende
avor
to c
ompe
te in
the
emis
sion
redu
ctio
ns m
arke
t; it
is
rest
ricte
d to
US$
180
milli
on a
nd is
sc
hedu
led
to te
rmin
ate
in 2
012.
R
UR
AL
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T –
DG
F
12
CG
IAR
In
crea
sing
pro
duct
ivity
Pr
otec
ting
the
envi
ronm
ent
Savi
ng b
iodi
vers
ity
Impr
ovin
g po
licie
s St
reng
then
ing
natio
nal r
esea
rch
-Res
earc
h on
impr
ovem
ent o
f pl
ants
, liv
esto
ck fi
sh a
nd tr
ees,
and
th
e pr
omot
ion
of b
ette
r nat
ural
re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t pra
ctic
es
-Man
agin
g th
e w
orld
’s la
rges
t co
llect
ion
of p
lant
gen
etic
re
sour
ces,
hel
d in
trus
t on
beha
lf of
th
e gl
obal
com
mun
ity
-Pol
icy
rese
arch
Tr
aini
ng a
nd c
apac
ity b
uild
ing
Mak
es d
evel
opin
g co
untry
agr
icul
ture
m
ore
prod
uctiv
e; re
sear
ch c
onse
rves
na
tura
l res
ourc
es, e
spec
ially
land
an
d w
ater
; hol
ds in
pub
lic tr
ust t
he
wor
ld’s
larg
est c
olle
ctio
n of
pla
nt
gene
tic re
sour
ces;
impr
oves
nat
iona
l po
licie
s, a
nd e
ncou
rage
s th
e ad
optio
n an
d di
ssem
inat
ion
of n
ew
tech
nolo
gies
; wor
ks w
ith d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es in
stre
ngth
enin
g na
tiona
l re
sear
ch c
apac
ities
.
Non
e gi
ven
Annex H 36
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
13
G
loba
l Wat
er
partn
ersh
ip
Cle
arly
est
ablis
h th
e pr
inci
ples
of
sust
aina
ble
wat
er re
sour
ces
man
agem
ent;
Supp
ort a
ctio
n at
lo
cal,
natio
nal,
regi
onal
or r
iver
-ba
sin
leve
l tha
t fol
low
prin
cipl
es f
sust
aina
ble
wat
er re
sour
ces
man
agem
ent;
Iden
tify
gaps
and
st
imul
ate
its p
artn
ers
to m
eet c
ritic
al
need
s w
ithin
thei
r ava
ilabl
e hu
man
an
d fin
anci
al re
sour
ces;
and
Hel
p m
atch
nee
ds to
ava
ilabl
e re
sour
ces.
Th
e ov
eral
l dev
elop
men
t obj
ectiv
e of
the
prog
ram
is to
ach
ieve
glo
bal
wat
er s
ecur
ity a
s a
cont
ribut
ion
to
elim
inat
ing
pove
rty, i
mpr
ovin
g w
ell-
bein
g an
d pr
otec
ting
natu
ral
reso
urce
s.
GW
P’s
wor
k is
div
ided
into
four
m
ain
area
s:
> Bu
ildin
g pa
rtner
ship
s th
at ta
ke
actio
n to
intro
duce
and
impl
emen
t in
tegr
ated
wat
er re
sour
ces
man
agem
ent.
>
Ensu
ring
GW
P’s
Asso
ciat
ed
Prog
ram
mes
pro
vide
requ
ired
stra
tegi
c su
ppor
t to
the
regi
ons
and
coun
tries
>
Fillin
g th
e ‘IW
RM
Too
l Box
as
a so
urce
of r
eal-l
ife le
sson
s le
arnt
fro
m im
plem
entin
g IW
RM
. >
Con
stru
ctin
g a
portf
olio
of
regi
onal
act
ions
on
IWR
M fo
r pr
esen
tatio
n at
the
3rd
Wor
ld W
ater
Fo
rum
in K
yoto
, Jap
an
Activ
ities
to d
ate
have
focu
sed
on
netw
ork
build
ing,
bot
h at
the
glob
al
and
regi
onal
leve
ls; p
artic
ipat
ing
in
and
orga
nizi
ng in
tern
atio
nal
conf
eren
ces;
and
pla
ying
a m
ajor
--
som
etim
es le
ad --
role
in d
evel
opin
g im
porta
nt p
olic
y do
cum
ents
and
st
atem
ents
(e.g
. the
Vis
ion
to A
ctio
n do
cum
ents
of t
he 2
000
Seco
nd
Wor
ld W
ater
For
um).
The
GW
P ha
s no
t yet
bee
n su
cces
sful
in e
ngag
ing
in o
n-th
e-gr
ound
act
iviti
es in
in
tegr
ated
wat
er re
sour
ce
man
agem
ent,
and
the
inst
itutio
nal
link
to A
ssoc
iate
d Pr
ogra
ms,
whi
ch
do s
uppo
rt on
-the-
grou
nd a
ctiv
ities
, di
d no
t mat
eria
lize
as in
tend
ed.
DG
F su
ppor
t has
bee
n ke
y in
ge
tting
the
GW
P of
f the
gro
und.
The
ap
plic
atio
n is
for a
four
th y
ear o
f fu
ndin
g fro
m th
e D
GF.
The
Ban
k’s
reso
urce
s ar
e a
core
ele
men
t for
pa
ying
the
cost
s of
the
Tech
nica
l C
omm
ittee
and
the
Secr
etar
iat.
FY02
is th
e fin
al y
ear o
f DG
F fu
ndin
g.
14
The
Wor
ld
Com
mis
sion
on
Dam
s Th
e W
CD
aim
s to
fund
amen
tally
in
fluen
ce th
e fu
ture
of h
ydro
pow
er
and
the
of d
ams
as a
mea
ns o
f st
orag
e an
d w
ater
reso
urce
s m
anag
emen
t. Th
e ke
y ob
ject
ives
for
the
WC
D, a
s pr
escr
ibed
by
its
man
date
are
to: (
i) R
evie
w th
e de
velo
pmen
t effe
ctiv
enes
s of
dam
s an
d as
sess
alte
rnat
ives
for w
ater
re
sour
ces
and
ener
gy d
evel
opm
ent;
(ii) D
evel
op in
tern
atio
nally
ac
cept
able
crit
eria
, gui
delin
es a
nd
stan
dard
s w
here
app
ropr
iate
, for
the
plan
ning
, des
ign,
app
rais
al,
cons
truct
ion,
mon
itorin
g an
d de
com
mis
sion
ing
of d
ams.
-Com
plet
e a
glob
al re
view
of t
he
deve
lopm
ent e
ffect
iven
ess
of d
ams;
C
reat
e a
fram
ewor
k fo
r opt
ions
as
sess
men
t and
dec
isio
n m
akin
g pr
oces
ses;
Com
plet
e in
depe
nden
t ca
se s
tudi
es; C
ondu
ct th
emat
ic
revi
ews/
expe
rt pa
nel r
epor
ts;
Com
plet
e a
surv
ey o
f 150
larg
e da
ms
refle
ctin
g ch
arac
teris
tics
of
glob
al d
ams
popu
latio
n; D
raft
a se
t of
reco
mm
ende
d in
tern
atio
nal
polic
ies,
sta
ndar
ds, a
nd c
riter
ia fo
r de
cisi
on-m
akin
g on
dam
s an
d re
late
d w
ater
and
ene
rgy
reso
urce
s m
anag
emen
t asp
ects
.
Thre
e ou
tput
s ha
ve b
een
plan
ned
for
com
plet
ion
by A
ugus
t 200
0:
-A g
loba
l rev
iew
of t
he d
evel
opm
ent
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
dam
s;
-A fr
amew
ork
for o
ptio
ns a
sses
smen
t an
d de
cisi
on m
akin
g pr
oces
ses
for
the
deve
lopm
ent a
nd m
anag
emen
t of
wat
er a
nd e
nerg
y se
rvic
es;
-A s
et o
f crit
eria
, gui
delin
es a
nd
stan
dard
s w
here
app
ropr
iate
for t
he
plan
ning
, app
rais
al, d
esig
n,
cons
truct
ion,
ope
ratio
n, m
onito
ring
and
deco
mm
issi
onin
g of
dam
s.
The
Wor
ld C
omm
issi
on o
n D
ams
will
exit
upon
com
plet
ion
of it
s m
anda
te a
t the
end
of F
Y01.
R
UR
AL
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T –
NO
N-D
GF
15
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g fo
r Tr
ade
Polic
y, S
trate
gy
Dev
elop
men
t and
W
TO N
egot
iatio
ns
The
proj
ect a
ims
to c
arry
-out
an
inte
grat
ed p
rogr
am o
f res
earc
h,
polic
y an
alys
es, a
nd c
apac
ity
build
ing
to s
treng
then
the
abilit
y of
de
velo
ping
cou
ntrie
s to
cap
ture
the
bene
fits
from
trad
e an
d gl
obal
m
arke
t dev
elop
men
ts.
A tw
o-pr
onge
d ap
proa
ch is
ado
pted
to
(i) f
ocus
on
the
need
s of
poo
r co
untri
es in
side
the
trade
ne
gotia
tions
and
sec
ond,
and
(ii)
to
adva
nce
com
plem
enta
ry m
easu
res
such
as
mai
nstre
amin
g tra
de
capa
city
dev
elop
men
t and
in
tegr
atio
n st
rate
gy in
Ban
k as
sist
ance
.
37 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
16
C
omm
odity
Pric
e R
isk
Man
agem
ent P
roje
ct
The
Task
For
ce w
ill pr
ovid
e sm
all-
scal
e pr
oduc
ers
with
acc
ess
to p
rice
risk
man
agem
ent i
nstru
men
ts: a
) pr
ovid
ing
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce
and
capa
city
bui
ldin
g to
ena
ble
pote
ntia
l be
nefic
iarie
s to
stru
ctur
e a
pric
e in
sura
nce
trans
actio
n th
at m
eets
th
eir n
eeds
and
obj
ectiv
es.
A de
sk re
view
of a
com
mod
ity
sect
or in
a s
peci
fic c
ount
ry;
field
wor
k th
at w
ill de
term
ine
the
poss
ibilit
y of
dev
elop
ing
an
oper
atio
naliz
ed p
rogr
am to
sup
ply
pric
e in
sura
nce
in a
giv
en s
ecto
r; de
velo
ping
an
in d
epth
cos
t es
timat
e of
runn
ing
a pi
lot p
rogr
am;
esta
blis
hing
a b
asel
ine
data
set
to
eval
uate
impa
ct a
nd re
sults
; and
m
akin
g a
deci
sion
on
whe
ther
or n
ot
to d
evel
op a
pilo
t pric
e in
sura
nce
serv
ice.
The
ITF
is c
urre
ntly
look
ing
at p
rice
insu
ranc
e fo
r a n
umbe
r of c
omm
odity
se
ctor
s ac
ross
num
erou
s co
untri
es.
In e
ach
coun
try, t
he IT
F’s
wor
k w
ill pr
ocee
d th
roug
h th
ree
phas
es:
Phas
e 1:
a d
esk
revi
ew o
f the
sp
ecifi
c co
untry
and
sec
tor.
Ph
ase
2: fi
eldw
ork
to d
eter
min
e th
e ov
eral
l fea
sibi
lity
and
the
poss
ibilit
y of
dev
elop
ing
an o
pera
tiona
lized
pr
ogra
m to
sup
ply
pric
e in
sura
nce.
Ph
ase
3: la
ying
the
foun
datio
n fo
r im
plem
entin
g pr
ice
insu
ranc
e tra
nsac
tions
.
Non
e at
this
tim
e
17
Feed
ing
Min
ds,
Figh
ting
Hun
ger
Erad
icat
ing
hung
er a
nd m
alnu
tritio
n by
pro
mot
ing
curri
culu
m b
ased
le
arni
ng o
n is
sues
rela
ted
to w
orld
hu
nger
, foo
d se
curit
y an
d nu
tritio
n as
key
suc
cess
fact
ors
for m
akin
g th
is g
loba
l vis
ion
a re
ality
. Thu
s ef
forts
are
focu
sed
on th
e yo
ung
and
thei
r tea
cher
s.
Dev
elop
ing
curri
culu
m; A
ssis
ting
in
the
coor
dina
tion
of a
“glo
bal t
each
in
” in
scho
ols
arou
nd th
e w
orld
; Fa
cilit
ate
a fo
rum
for s
harin
g le
sson
s an
d ex
perie
nces
from
pa
rtici
pant
s an
d be
nefic
iarie
s;
Prod
uctio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
f a
web
site
con
tain
ing
all t
each
ing
mat
eria
l; Pr
oduc
tion
of a
mul
ti-la
ngua
ge C
D c
onta
inin
g al
l the
te
achi
ng m
ater
ial;
Prod
uctio
n of
pr
omot
iona
l vid
eo to
ass
ist i
n se
curin
g fu
rther
gra
nt a
nd
foun
datio
n fu
ndin
g.
Dev
elop
an
evol
ving
cur
ricul
um
targ
etin
g sc
hool
age
chi
ldre
n to
be
tter u
nder
stan
ding
of h
unge
r and
m
alnu
tritio
n. A
ctiv
ities
are
org
aniz
ed
arou
nd W
orld
Foo
d D
ay, 1
6 O
ctob
er
– to
max
imiz
e gl
obal
impa
ct.
Non
e.
18
Glo
bal I
nteg
rate
d Pe
st
Man
agem
ent F
acilit
y Th
e m
anda
te o
f the
Glo
bal I
PM
Faci
lity
is to
ass
ist i
nter
este
d G
over
nmen
ts a
nd N
GO
s to
initi
ate,
de
velo
p an
d ex
pand
Nat
iona
l and
Lo
cal I
nteg
rate
d Pe
st M
anag
emen
t pr
ogra
mm
es. I
PM p
rogr
amm
es a
im
to re
duce
pes
ticid
es in
puts
whi
le
incr
easi
ng p
rodu
ctio
n an
d pr
ofits
th
roug
h im
prov
ed p
est
man
agem
ent.
Cre
atin
g aw
aren
ess
and
an
enab
ling
envi
ronm
ent f
or IP
M
Hel
ping
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t of p
ilot
field
pro
gram
mes
Ac
cess
ing
othe
r pro
gram
mes
and
in
form
atio
n
Esta
blis
hing
tech
nica
l and
pol
icy
IPM
link
ages
Farm
ers
and
exte
nsio
nist
s tra
ined
on
IPM
tech
niqu
es; V
ario
us te
chni
cal
repo
rts a
nd p
olic
y do
cum
ents
pr
epar
ed; A
war
enes
s of
the
gene
ral
publ
ic a
nd p
olic
y m
aker
s on
IPM
and
pe
stic
ide
issu
es ra
ised
; N
etw
orks
est
ablis
hed
amon
g G
over
nmen
tal a
nd N
on-G
over
nmen
tal
Org
aniz
atio
ns, f
arm
ers’
ass
ocia
tions
, te
chni
cal a
nd re
sear
ch in
stitu
tes
and
dono
r age
ncie
s.
Annex H 38
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
19
Th
e Po
pula
r Coa
litio
n to
Era
dica
te H
unge
r an
d Po
verty
The
Popu
lar C
oalit
ion
aim
s to
bui
ld
stra
tegi
c al
lianc
es a
mon
g di
vers
e de
velo
pmen
t org
aniz
atio
ns, p
laci
ng
parti
cula
r em
phas
is o
n th
e ro
le o
f ci
vil s
ocie
ty in
ove
rcom
ing
hung
er
and
pove
rty. T
he P
opul
ar C
oalit
ion
is a
mec
hani
sm th
roug
h w
hich
pa
rtner
org
aniz
atio
ns c
an te
st
inno
vatio
ns d
esig
ned
to s
treng
then
pa
rtici
patio
n by
the
rura
l poo
r, en
hanc
e st
rate
gic
polic
y fo
rmat
ion
and
targ
et re
sour
ces
mor
e ef
fect
ivel
y.
Esta
blis
hing
Kno
wle
dge
Net
wor
ks;
Empo
wer
ing
Com
mun
ities
; Bui
ldin
g Pu
blic
Com
mitm
ent;
Rur
al F
inan
cial
Se
rvic
es a
nd C
olla
tera
l Sub
stitu
tes;
Pr
even
ting
Emer
genc
ies;
Su
ppor
ting
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Con
vent
ion
to C
omba
t D
eser
tific
atio
n.
The
Popu
lar C
oalit
ion
has
form
ed a
n Ag
raria
n R
efor
m N
etw
ork
(AR
net)
in
24 c
ount
ries
to c
aptu
re th
e le
sson
s le
arne
d fro
m th
e pr
actic
al w
ork
of
civi
l-soc
iety
org
aniz
atio
ns in
land
re
form
and
tenu
rial s
ecur
ity; a
C
omm
unity
Em
pow
erm
ent F
acilit
y ha
s be
en c
reat
ed; t
o pr
omot
e aw
aren
ess-
rais
ing
prog
ram
s ai
med
at
fost
erin
g th
e pu
blic
and
pol
itica
l co
mm
itmen
ts n
eede
d fo
r sus
tain
able
ag
raria
n re
form
pro
gram
s; A
Rne
t and
th
e C
omm
unity
Em
pow
erm
ent
Faci
lity
will
assi
st in
the
plan
ning
and
im
plem
enta
tion
of n
atio
nal a
ctio
n pr
ogra
ms
to c
omba
t des
ertif
icat
ion
by h
elpi
ng c
ivil
soci
ety
and
gove
rnm
ents
add
ress
the
land
tenu
re
requ
irem
ent
SO
CIA
L D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
- DG
F
20
Smal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
Th
e pu
rpos
e of
the
Smal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
is to
sup
port
the
empo
wer
men
t of c
itize
ns to
hav
e gr
eate
r ow
ners
hip
of d
evel
opm
ent
proc
esse
s, th
ereb
y m
akin
g th
ese
proc
esse
s m
ore
incl
usiv
e an
d eq
uita
ble.
The
Smal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
sup
ports
ac
tiviti
es th
at p
rom
ote
dial
ogue
and
di
ssem
inat
ion
of in
form
atio
n; a
nd
enha
nce
partn
ersh
ips
with
key
pl
ayer
s in
sup
port
of th
e de
velo
pmen
t pro
cess
.
In F
Y01,
57
Cou
ntry
Offi
ces
rece
ived
fu
ndin
g ($
30,0
00 o
r $45
,000
eac
h,
tota
l of a
lmos
t $2.
3 m
illion
) to
supp
ort
two
prim
ary
obje
ctiv
es: (
i) to
pro
mot
e di
alog
ue a
nd d
isse
min
atio
n on
de
velo
pmen
t, an
d (ii
) to
enha
nce
partn
ersh
ips
with
key
pla
yers
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t are
na.
Non
e gi
ven
21
Post
-Con
flict
Fun
d Th
e Ba
nk m
akes
sub
-gra
nts
to a
ra
nge
of p
artn
ers
to p
rovi
de e
arlie
r an
d br
oade
r Ban
k as
sist
ance
to
conf
lict-a
ffect
ed c
ount
ries.
The
ob
ject
ive
is to
‘pos
ition
’ the
Ban
k th
roug
h co
nstru
ctiv
e en
gage
men
t in
such
cou
ntrie
s w
here
nor
mal
in
stru
men
ts a
nd b
udge
t pro
visi
ons
cann
ot a
pply
.
Prov
idin
g gr
ants
to W
atch
ing
Brie
fs,
Tran
sitio
nal S
uppo
rt St
rate
gies
, ea
rly re
cons
truct
ion
activ
ities
, pol
icy
stud
ies
and
conf
lict a
naly
sis.
Typi
cally
, sub
-gra
nts
cove
r (i)
’wat
chin
g br
iefs
’ on
coun
tries
in
conf
lict;
(ii) e
arly
ass
essm
ent,
plan
ning
and
pilo
ting
of
reco
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es, a
nd (i
ii) a
sm
all n
umbe
r of c
apac
ity-b
uild
ing
and
actio
n re
sear
ch p
ropo
sals
. In
the
first
thre
e ye
ars
of o
pera
tion
75
gran
ts to
talin
g $2
2m h
ave
been
m
ade.
All i
ndiv
idua
l act
iviti
es fi
nanc
ed b
y th
e PC
F ha
ve a
spe
cific
gra
nt
perio
d. T
he F
Y02
DG
F ap
plic
atio
n co
ntin
ues
a 3-
year
stra
tegy
to
mai
ntai
n D
GF
supp
ort w
hile
the
pote
ntia
l for
don
or s
uppo
rt is
test
ed
39 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
SOC
IAL
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T –
NO
N-D
GF
22
Inte
rnat
iona
l For
um o
n C
apac
ity B
uild
ing
of
Sout
hern
NG
Os
IFC
B ai
ms
to im
prov
e th
e qu
ality
of
capa
city
bui
ldin
g of
SN
GO
s an
d th
us e
nhan
ce th
e co
ntrib
utio
n of
SN
GO
s to
dev
elop
men
t ini
tiativ
es
thro
ugh
a re
defin
ition
of r
oles
and
re
latio
nshi
ps b
etw
een
diffe
rent
st
akeh
olde
r gro
ups.
Iden
tifyi
ng a
nd a
naly
zing
cap
acity
bu
ildin
g ne
eds
and
prac
tices
; fa
cilit
atin
g di
alog
ue a
mon
g ke
y st
akeh
olde
rs; a
nd d
raw
ing
less
ons
from
the
expe
rienc
e.
Cha
nges
in s
take
hold
er a
ppro
ache
s an
d po
licie
s; In
crea
sed
awar
enes
s ab
out c
apac
ity b
uild
ing
amon
g N
GO
s; D
eepe
n kn
owle
dge
base
ab
out S
NG
O c
apac
ity b
uild
ing
need
s an
d pr
iorit
ies;
Sta
keho
lder
s en
gage
d in
dia
logu
e an
d co
mm
on
reco
mm
enda
tions
/ und
erst
andi
ng
reac
hed
at n
atio
nal l
evel
; Les
sons
sy
nthe
size
d on
new
exp
erie
nces
in
BGO
coa
litio
ns, a
llianc
es &
ne
twor
king
. Som
e 70
0 in
divi
dual
N
GO
s fro
m 6
9 co
untri
es p
artic
ipat
ed
in v
ario
us IF
CB
activ
ities
.
23
PRSP
Lea
rnin
g Ac
tion
Prog
ram
Th
e ke
y fo
cus
of th
e ac
tion
lear
ning
pr
ogra
m is
to s
uppo
rt an
d st
reng
then
par
ticip
ator
y pr
oces
ses
for t
he fo
rmul
atio
n an
d m
onito
ring
of
pove
rty re
duct
ion
stra
tegi
es.
Pove
rty d
iagn
osis
and
ana
lysi
s;
Mac
ro-e
cono
mic
pol
icy
form
ulat
ion
and
refo
rm; P
ublic
exp
endi
ture
re
view
and
bud
gets
; Par
ticip
atio
n in
m
onito
ring
outc
omes
of P
over
ty
Red
uctio
n St
rate
gies
.
Rep
orts
, cas
e st
udie
s, C
D-R
OM
.
FI
NA
NC
IAL
SEC
TOR
– D
GF
24
Faci
lity
for F
inan
cial
Se
ctor
Stre
ngth
enin
g Pr
ovid
e a
mec
hani
sm fo
r the
or
gani
zatio
n an
d fu
ndin
g of
a
conc
erte
d in
itiat
ive
to h
elp
coun
tries
im
plem
ent s
ound
pra
ctic
es to
lim
it fin
anci
al s
ecto
r vul
nera
bilit
ies
and
prom
ote
finan
cial
sec
tor
deve
lopm
ent.
Arra
nge
and
fund
tech
nica
l as
sist
ance
and
trai
ning
; and
Bui
ld a
ne
twor
k of
fina
ncia
l res
truct
urin
g pr
actit
ione
rs a
nd o
rgan
ize
fora
to
fost
er e
xcha
nge
of e
xper
ienc
es a
nd
diss
emin
atio
n of
sou
nd p
ract
ices
on
finan
cial
rest
ruct
urin
g.
Tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce
in a
bout
15-
20
coun
tries
per
yea
r; or
gani
ze a
bout
si
x fo
ra p
er y
ear.
Dev
elop
a d
ata
base
of i
nfor
mat
ion
and
expe
rts o
n fin
anci
al re
stru
ctur
ing.
The
prop
osed
dis
enga
gem
ent
stra
tegy
is fo
r the
FSS
F G
over
ning
C
ounc
il, b
egin
ning
Jul
y 20
03, t
o ev
alua
te tw
o op
tions
for
dise
ngag
emen
t fro
m D
GF
Win
dow
2
fund
ing:
(1) b
ilate
ral d
onor
fund
ing
of
the
entir
e bu
dget
or (
2) D
GF
Win
dow
1
fund
ing.
25
Toro
nto
Inte
rnat
iona
l Le
ader
ship
Cen
tre fo
r Fi
nanc
ial S
ecto
r Su
perv
isio
n
The
Toro
nto
Cen
tre’s
mis
sion
is to
: Pr
epar
e su
perv
isor
s to
stre
ngth
en
supe
rvis
ory
regi
mes
and
dea
l with
tro
uble
d fin
anci
al in
stitu
tions
; D
isse
min
ate
the
late
st in
lead
ersh
ip
know
ledg
e an
d ex
perti
se in
fina
ncia
l se
ctor
sup
ervi
sion
; and
Be
reco
gniz
ed in
tern
atio
nally
for
exce
llenc
e in
lead
ersh
ip
deve
lopm
ent o
f fin
anci
al s
ecto
r su
perv
isor
s.
The
Toro
nto
Cen
tre o
ffers
one
-w
eek
inte
ract
ive
sess
ions
that
are
de
sign
ed to
bui
ld le
ader
ship
ski
lls,
usin
g ca
se s
tudi
es p
rese
nted
by
curre
nt a
nd fo
rmer
sup
ervi
sory
ag
ency
exe
cutiv
es w
ho w
ere
actu
ally
invo
lved
in th
e ca
ses.
Cas
e pr
esen
ters
and
ses
sion
pa
rtici
pant
s cr
eate
a ri
ch p
ool o
f rea
l-w
orld
kno
wle
dge
by s
harin
g th
eir
prof
essi
onal
exp
erie
nces
, dis
cuss
ing
the
chal
leng
es th
ey fa
ce, a
nd
mot
ivat
ing
one
anot
her t
o fin
d ne
w
lead
ersh
ip s
trate
gies
for d
ealin
g w
ith
thos
e ch
alle
nges
.
Annex H 40
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
FIN
AN
CIA
L SE
CTO
R –
NO
N-D
GF
26
Fina
ncia
l Sec
tor
Asse
ssm
ent P
rogr
am
The
FSAP
see
ks to
iden
tify
finan
cial
sy
stem
stre
ngth
s an
d vu
lner
abilit
ies
and
to re
duce
the
pote
ntia
l for
cris
is,
ther
eby
cont
ribut
ing
to e
fforts
to
prom
ote
natio
nal a
nd in
tern
atio
nal
finan
cial
sta
bilit
y an
d gr
owth
.
The
FSAP
aim
s to
incr
ease
the
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
effo
rts to
pro
mot
e th
e so
undn
ess
of fi
nanc
ial s
yste
ms
in m
embe
r cou
ntrie
s. T
he p
rogr
am
seek
s to
iden
tify
the
stre
ngth
s an
d vu
lner
abilit
ies
of a
cou
ntry
's
finan
cial
sys
tem
; to
dete
rmin
e ho
w
key
sour
ces
of ri
sk a
re b
eing
m
anag
ed; t
o as
certa
in th
e se
ctor
's
deve
lopm
enta
l and
tech
nica
l as
sist
ance
nee
ds; a
nd to
hel
p pr
iorit
ize
polic
y re
spon
ses.
Cou
ntry
fina
ncia
l sec
tor a
sses
smen
t re
ports
. N
one.
27
Fina
ncia
l Sta
bilit
y Fo
rum
Th
e ob
ject
ives
of t
he F
SF a
re: t
o as
sess
vul
nera
bilit
ies
affe
ctin
g th
e in
tern
atio
nal f
inan
cial
sys
tem
; to
iden
tify
and
over
see
actio
n ne
eded
to
add
ress
thes
e vu
lner
abilit
ies;
and
to
impr
ove
co-o
rdin
atio
n an
d in
form
atio
n ex
chan
ge a
mon
g th
e va
rious
aut
horit
ies
resp
onsi
ble
for
finan
cial
sta
bilit
y.
The
Foru
m b
rings
toge
ther
on
a re
gula
r bas
is n
atio
nal a
utho
ritie
s re
spon
sibl
e fo
r fin
anci
al s
tabi
lity
in
sign
ifica
nt in
tern
atio
nal f
inan
cial
ce
ntre
s, in
tern
atio
nal f
inan
cial
in
stitu
tions
, sec
tor-s
peci
fic
inte
rnat
iona
l gro
upin
gs o
f reg
ulat
ors
and
supe
rvis
ors,
and
com
mitt
ees
of
cent
ral b
ank
expe
rts.
A C
ompe
ndiu
m o
f Sta
ndar
ds; r
epor
ts
Non
e.
ED
UC
ATI
ON
– D
GF
28
The
Partn
ersh
ip fo
r C
hild
Dev
elop
men
t Th
e m
ajor
focu
s of
act
ivity
wou
ld b
e in
the
crea
tion
and
diss
emin
atio
n of
kn
owle
dge
on e
ffect
ive
scho
ol
heal
th s
trate
gies
, and
to p
rom
ote
and
stre
ngth
en c
omm
unic
atio
n an
d kn
owle
dge
netw
orks
and
cro
ss-
sect
oral
par
tner
ship
s in
the
field
of
scho
ol h
ealth
. The
se in
itiat
ives
will
be s
treng
then
ed b
y co
ntin
uing
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f lin
ks w
ith
gove
rnm
ents
, don
ors,
tech
nica
l in
stitu
tions
and
civ
il so
ciet
y.
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g, a
kno
wle
dge
gene
ratio
n ef
fort
and
the
prom
otio
n an
d st
reng
then
ing
of
com
mun
icat
ion
and
know
ledg
e ne
twor
ks a
nd c
ross
-sec
tora
l pa
rtner
ship
s in
the
field
of s
choo
l he
alth
. Res
earc
h to
impr
ove
the
targ
etin
g an
d de
liver
y of
HIV
/AID
S pr
even
tion,
and
to d
evel
op e
ffect
ive
stra
tegi
es to
miti
gate
the
impa
ct o
n th
e ed
ucat
ion
syst
ems.
The
Partn
ersh
ip fo
r Chi
ld
Dev
elop
men
t has
bee
n w
orki
ng to
pr
ovid
e th
e te
chni
cal b
asis
and
un
ders
tand
ing
of s
choo
l hea
lth p
ro-
gram
min
g. T
his
know
ledg
e cr
eatio
n ha
s re
sulte
d in
the
tech
nica
l pla
tform
fo
r the
laun
ch o
f the
FR
ESH
Par
t-ne
rshi
p, le
d by
the
Wor
ld B
ank,
U
NIC
EF, U
NES
CO
and
WH
O a
nd
laun
ched
at D
akar
in A
pril
2000
. Thi
s ha
s su
bseq
uent
ly re
sulte
d in
ele
ven
scho
ol h
ealth
com
pone
nts
of W
orld
Ba
nk p
rogr
ams
in A
frica
. The
Par
tner
-sh
ip in
put h
as b
een
cruc
ial f
or
prov
idin
g cr
oss-
sect
or e
vide
nce
of th
e im
pact
of h
ealth
and
nut
ritio
n in
ed
ucat
ion
and
deve
lopi
ng c
onse
nsus
ar
ound
cos
t-effe
ctiv
e in
terv
entio
ns.
Non
e gi
ven
41 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
29
U
NES
CO
Inst
itute
for
Stat
istic
s Th
e pr
inci
pal o
bjec
tives
of t
he
Inst
itute
wer
e st
ated
as
follo
ws:
to
esta
blis
h cu
rrent
and
em
ergi
ng
need
s fo
r sta
tistic
al d
ata
and
indi
cato
rs, t
o im
prov
e th
e co
llect
ion,
di
ssem
inat
ion
and
use
of
com
para
tive
inte
rnat
iona
l sta
tistic
s an
d to
bui
ld s
tatis
tical
cap
acity
in
mem
ber s
tate
s.
Col
lect
ing
up-to
-dat
e st
atis
tics
from
ac
ross
the
wor
ld a
ccor
ding
to a
gree
d qu
ality
pro
cedu
res
and
diss
emin
atin
g th
em to
the
user
s in
a fo
rm
appr
opria
te to
thei
r nee
ds;
Dev
elop
ing
the
conc
eptu
al a
nd
met
hodo
logi
cal f
ram
ewor
k fo
r the
co
llect
ion
of in
tern
atio
nally
co
mpa
rabl
e da
ta a
nd in
dica
tors
; W
orki
ng w
ith M
embe
r Sta
tes
to
impr
ove
thei
r cap
acitie
s to
col
lect
an
d an
alyz
e da
ta o
f rel
evan
ce to
th
eir p
olic
y in
itiat
ives
; and
ana
lyzi
ng
data
in p
artn
ersh
ip w
ith p
olic
y m
ak-
ers
and
rese
arch
ers,
and
pro
mot
ing
wid
er a
nd m
ore
info
rmed
use
of d
ata
for p
olic
y pu
rpos
es.
Sc
hedu
led
to e
xit i
n FY
06. I
t is
expe
cted
that
DG
F su
ppor
t will
be
requ
ired
thro
ugh
FY06
. Ban
k su
ppor
t will
help
to s
treng
then
the
cred
ibilit
y of
UIS
, and
wou
ld b
e a
cata
lytic
age
nt fo
r inc
reas
ed
finan
cial
sup
port
from
bila
tera
l and
ot
her i
nter
natio
nal d
evel
opm
ent
assi
stan
ce o
rgan
izat
ions
.
30
OEC
D W
orld
Ed
ucat
ion
Indi
cato
rs
Prog
ram
The
obje
ctiv
e is
to c
ontri
bute
to th
e kn
owle
dge
base
und
erpi
nnin
g pu
blic
pol
icie
s se
ekin
g to
impr
ove
acce
ss to
edu
catio
n, ra
ise
the
qual
ity o
f edu
catio
nal o
ppor
tuni
ties,
an
d to
ens
ure
an e
ffect
ive
use
of
reso
urce
s an
d a
fair
dist
ribut
ion
of
lear
ning
opp
ortu
nitie
s.
In a
dditi
on to
the
basi
c da
ta
colle
ctio
n to
der
ive
the
indi
cato
rs, a
nu
mbe
r of s
peci
al in
tere
st g
roup
s ha
ve b
een
form
ed to
rese
arch
ar
eas
requ
iring
dat
a de
velo
pmen
t an
d to
reco
mm
end
addi
tions
to th
e in
dica
tor s
et b
ased
on
thei
r in
vest
igat
ions
.
A fu
rther
dev
elop
ed ro
und
of d
ata
colle
ctio
n in
stru
men
ts w
ill be
im
plem
ente
d; A
n ex
pert
stud
y on
ed
ucat
iona
l fin
ance
in W
EI c
ount
ries;
Th
e de
velo
pmen
t and
im
plem
enta
tion
of a
met
hodo
logy
for
the
clas
sific
atio
n of
edu
catio
n pe
rson
nel;
Cou
ntry
-spe
cific
repo
rts
utiliz
ing
WEI
dat
a to
info
rm d
ebat
es
on n
atio
nal i
ssue
s; S
ampl
e su
rvey
of
scho
ols.
OEC
D W
orld
Edu
catio
n In
dica
tors
(W
EI p
rogr
am) -
- Sch
edul
ed to
exi
t in
FY0
2. D
GF
fund
s w
ill be
ch
anne
led
to b
oth
orga
niza
tions
for
the
WEI
pro
gram
unt
il FY
02. U
IS is
st
ill in
the
mid
st o
f ins
titut
iona
l de
velo
pmen
t and
stre
ngth
enin
g. It
w
ould
be
prem
atur
e fo
r UIS
to ta
ke
the
lead
role
in F
Y02.
It is
exp
ecte
d th
at in
FY0
3 U
IS w
ill ta
ke th
e le
ad
role
in e
xten
ding
the
WEI
pro
gram
to
dev
elop
ing
coun
tries
.
Annex H 42
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
31
Tr
ends
in M
athe
mat
ics
and
Scie
nce
Achi
evem
ent A
roun
d th
e W
orld
The
TIM
SS-2
003
will
asse
ss th
e m
athe
mat
ics
and
scie
nce
achi
evem
ent o
f a n
atio
nally
re
pres
enta
tive
sam
ple
of s
tude
nts
in
Gra
des
8 an
d 4
in p
artic
ipat
ing
coun
tries
, as
wel
l as
colle
ctin
g de
taile
d in
form
atio
n on
stu
dent
ba
ckgr
ound
s, s
choo
ls a
nd te
ache
rs.
It w
ill yi
eld
inte
rnat
iona
lly
com
para
ble
perfo
rman
ce
benc
hmar
ks fo
r sci
ence
and
m
athe
mat
ics
and
a re
ason
able
es
timat
e of
the
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
the
educ
atio
n sy
stem
with
resp
ect t
o th
ese
two
subj
ects
. For
thos
e co
untri
es th
at p
artic
ipat
ed in
TI
MSS
-R, t
rend
dat
a w
ill be
av
aila
ble
a G
rade
s 8
and
4 an
d w
ill pr
ovid
e ne
w a
nd p
ower
ful a
naly
tical
to
ols
for p
olic
y an
alys
is a
nd
inte
rven
tion.
Cle
anin
g of
cou
ntry
dat
a se
ts,
scal
ing
and
prep
arat
ion
of
inte
rnat
iona
l sca
le s
core
s,
benc
hmar
king
, pre
para
tion
and
chec
king
of t
he in
tern
atio
nal
repo
rts.
The
prin
cipa
l out
puts
will
be
inte
rnat
iona
lly c
ompa
rabl
e m
easu
res
of le
arni
ng a
chie
vem
ent i
n m
athe
mat
ics
and
scie
nce.
In
addi
tion,
the
data
will
be m
ade
avai
labl
e fo
r sec
onda
ry a
naly
sis.
M
any
rese
arch
pap
ers
will
be
publ
ishe
d. In
sup
port
of in
stitu
tiona
l de
velo
pmen
t in
the
partn
er c
ount
ries,
tra
inin
g do
cum
ents
, tes
t ins
trum
ents
, br
iefin
g m
ater
ials
, and
repo
rts w
ill be
pr
ovid
ed. T
IMSS
stu
dy re
sults
will
be
used
in p
olic
y di
alog
ues.
Sche
dule
d to
exi
t in
FY04
.
32
Prog
ress
in
Inte
rnat
iona
l Rea
ding
Li
tera
cy S
tudy
The
PIR
LS s
tudy
will
asse
ss
read
ing
liter
acy
achi
evem
ent o
f a
natio
nally
repr
esen
tativ
e sa
mpl
e of
st
uden
ts in
Gra
de 4
, as
wel
l as
colle
ctin
g de
taile
d in
form
atio
n on
st
uden
t bac
kgro
unds
, sch
ools
, te
ache
rs a
nd p
aren
ts.
Asse
ssm
ents
of r
eadi
ng
com
preh
ensi
on, g
athe
rs in
form
atio
n on
hom
e an
d sc
hool
con
text
s,
mea
sure
s tre
nds
in re
adin
g lit
erac
y,
sam
ples
stu
dent
s an
d sc
hool
s.
This
pro
ject
’s o
utco
mes
incl
ude
inte
rnat
iona
l ben
chm
arks
of s
tude
nt
perfo
rman
ce th
at m
ay b
e us
ed a
s in
dica
tors
of e
duca
tiona
l effi
cacy
. In
addi
tion,
the
desi
gn o
f the
stu
dy is
su
ch th
at a
t ris
k po
pula
tions
may
be
iden
tifie
d at
the
loca
l lev
el.
Sche
dule
d to
exi
t in
FY03
. No
furth
er D
GF
fund
ing
will
be s
ough
t be
yond
FY0
3.
43 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
33
W
orld
Lin
ks fo
r D
evel
opm
ent
To e
stab
lish
sust
aina
ble,
ed
ucat
iona
l on-
line
com
mun
ities
for
stud
ents
and
teac
hers
aro
und
the
wor
ld, i
n or
der t
o im
prov
e ed
ucat
iona
l opp
ortu
nitie
s, fa
cilit
ate
cultu
ral u
nder
stan
ding
acr
oss
natio
ns, h
elp
yout
h de
velo
p sk
ills
need
ed fo
r the
kno
wle
dge-
base
d gl
obal
eco
nom
y; T
o pr
omot
e th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
info
rmat
ion
tech
nolo
gy fo
r eco
nom
ic a
nd s
ocia
l de
velo
pmen
t; -T
o pr
ovid
e tra
inin
g of
tra
iner
s an
d te
ache
rs fo
r the
pu
rpos
e of
inte
grat
ing
tech
nolo
gy a
s a
lear
ning
tool
in th
e cl
assr
oom
; To
cont
ribut
e to
initi
ativ
es th
at im
prov
e ed
ucat
ion,
hea
lth a
nd e
mpl
oym
ent,
and
that
redu
ce p
over
ty in
de
velo
ping
cou
ntrie
s; T
o fa
cilit
ate
the
exch
ange
of w
ritin
g ex
erci
ses,
sc
ienc
e pr
ojec
ts, g
eogr
aphy
le
sson
s, h
isto
rical
per
spec
tives
, id
eas
of th
e st
uden
ts in
dev
elop
ing
coun
tries
with
thei
r pee
rs in
in
dust
rializ
ed c
ount
ries,
via
E-m
ail,
Inte
rnet
and
the
Wor
ld W
ide
Web
.
Advo
cacy
; Res
earc
h; K
now
ledg
e M
anag
emen
t; D
onor
/ Par
tner
C
oord
inat
ion;
Res
ourc
e M
obiliz
atio
n; A
dvis
ory
Serv
ices
; Po
licy
Ref
orm
; Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g;
Dev
elop
men
t of C
omm
unity
bas
ed
Serv
ices
.
Mor
e th
an 5
00 s
choo
ls in
20
deve
lopi
ng c
ount
ries
are
linke
d w
ith
over
1,0
00 s
choo
ls in
mor
e th
an 2
0 co
untri
es in
bot
h th
e de
velo
ped
and
the
deve
lopi
ng w
orld
, wor
king
on
mor
e th
an 7
5 co
llabo
rativ
e pr
ojec
ts.
Sinc
e th
e be
ginn
ing
of F
Y00
over
7,
500
teac
hers
, stu
dent
s, a
nd s
choo
l ad
min
istra
tors
hav
e be
en tr
aine
d in
th
e us
e of
tech
nolo
gy to
impr
ove
teac
hing
and
lear
ning
, in
five
lang
uage
s, a
nd a
n es
timat
ed
100,
000
stud
ents
and
teac
hers
are
cu
rrent
ly p
artic
ipat
ing
in W
orLD
ac
tiviti
es
The
Wor
LD P
rogr
am is
exp
licitl
y de
sign
ed to
hav
e 3-
year
life
span
in
each
cou
ntry
. It i
s ex
pect
ed th
at,
afte
r 3 y
ears
, par
ticip
atin
g co
untri
es
are
able
to c
ontin
ue a
nd e
xpan
d ac
tiviti
es o
n th
eir o
wn.
ED
UC
ATI
ON
– N
ON
-DG
F
34
Focu
sing
Res
ourc
es
on E
ffect
ive
Scho
ol
Hea
lth
Enha
nce
the
qual
ity a
nd e
quity
of
educ
atio
n; Im
prov
e th
e he
alth
and
le
arni
ng o
f sch
ool c
hild
ren
thro
ugh
scho
ol-b
ased
hea
lth a
nd n
utrit
ion.
Advo
cacy
; Res
earc
h; K
now
ledg
e M
anag
emen
t; D
onor
/ Par
tner
C
oord
inat
ion;
Res
ourc
e M
obiliz
atio
n; A
dvis
ory
Serv
ices
; Po
licy
Ref
orm
; Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g;
Dev
elop
men
t of C
omm
unity
bas
ed
Serv
ices
The
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
FR
ESH
ra
tiona
le, t
ool k
its, a
nd n
etw
orks
to
shar
e in
form
atio
n ab
out F
RES
H, h
ave
resu
lted
in c
ompo
nent
s of
ele
ven
proj
ects
ser
ving
mor
e th
an 6
3 m
illion
ch
ildre
n in
Afri
ca.
H
EALT
H -
DG
F
35
Cen
tre o
f Exc
elle
nce
for N
utrit
ion,
In
tern
atio
nal C
ente
r for
D
iarrh
eal D
isea
se
Res
earc
h, B
angl
ades
h
The
goal
of t
he p
rogr
am is
to
deve
lop
and
diss
emin
ate
cost
-ef
fect
ive
solu
tions
to m
alnu
tritio
n,
parti
cula
rly a
s it
affe
cts
mot
hers
and
ch
ildre
n.
Ope
ratio
ns R
esea
rch;
Dev
elop
men
t of
sta
ndar
dize
d tre
atm
ent p
roto
cols
; N
utrit
ion
educ
atio
n, n
utrit
ion
surv
eilla
nce;
Les
sons
lear
ned
Exam
ples
: Ear
ly re
sear
ch o
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t of O
ral R
ehyd
ratio
n So
lutio
n; D
emon
stra
tion
of th
e lim
itatio
ns o
f the
old
inje
ctab
le
chol
era
vacc
ine;
Unp
aral
lele
d ex
perti
se in
com
mun
ity-b
ased
hea
lth
care
sys
tem
s; tr
aine
d ne
arly
15,
000
heal
th c
are
prof
essi
onal
s an
d le
adin
g ex
perts
in p
ublic
hea
lth a
nd e
nter
ic
dise
ases
Annex H 44
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
36
G
loba
l For
um fo
r H
ealth
Res
earc
h To
hel
p fo
cus
rese
arch
effo
rts o
n th
e he
alth
pro
blem
s re
sulti
ng in
the
heav
iest
bur
den
on th
e w
orld
’s
heal
th,;
To im
prov
e th
e re
allo
catio
n of
hea
lth re
sear
ch fu
nds;
and
To
faci
litat
e be
tter c
olla
bora
tion
on
heal
th re
sear
ch b
etw
een
partn
ers
both
in th
e pu
blic
and
the
priv
ate
sect
ors.
Advo
cacy
; Res
earc
h on
the
burd
en
of d
isea
se, r
esou
rce
flow
s, a
nd
cost
-effe
ctiv
enes
s to
aid
de
velo
pmen
t of c
onse
nsus
on
prio
ritie
s; D
isse
min
atio
n of
in
form
atio
n an
d re
sear
ch fi
ndin
gs;
Partn
er a
nd d
onor
coo
rdin
atio
n;
Attra
ctin
g ne
w fi
nanc
ing.
Thre
e an
nual
For
ums,
and
one
maj
or
inte
rnat
iona
l con
fere
nce,
attr
actin
g go
vern
men
t; C
atal
ytic
role
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t of i
mpo
rtant
glo
bal
initi
ativ
es; G
row
ing
cons
ensu
s on
the
impo
rtanc
e of
pre
viou
sly
unde
rest
imat
ed c
ause
s of
ill-h
ealth
an
d po
verty
in d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es.
Long
term
sup
port
is re
ques
ted
for
the
Glo
bal F
orum
, sub
ject
to
satis
fact
ory
eval
uatio
n.
37
Glo
bal A
llianc
e fo
r Va
ccin
es a
nd
Imm
uniz
atio
n
To b
uild
a g
loba
l coa
litio
n of
or
gani
zatio
ns fr
om th
e pu
blic
, pr
ivat
e an
d no
n-go
vern
men
tal
sect
ors,
focu
sed
on s
treng
then
ing
the
glob
al a
nd c
ount
ry e
fforts
to
deve
lop
and
intro
duce
prio
rity
new
va
ccin
es fo
r chi
ldre
n.
Dev
elop
stra
tegi
es to
stre
ngth
en
child
hood
imm
uniz
atio
n, a
nd
prov
ide
tech
nica
l sup
port
to h
elp
coun
tries
ach
ieve
thei
r pla
ns to
st
reng
then
imm
uniz
atio
n se
rvic
es.
The
Vacc
ine
Fund
, a g
rant
-giv
ing
mec
hani
sm, i
s pa
rtner
ing
with
GAV
I pa
rtner
s to
del
iver
vac
cine
s an
d pa
y fo
r im
mun
izat
ion
syst
em
stre
ngth
enin
g.
Rec
eive
d an
d pr
oces
sed
prop
osal
s fro
m 5
4 of
the
74 c
ount
ries
that
hav
e pe
r cap
ita in
com
es b
elow
$10
00;
Com
mitt
ed U
S$60
0 m
illion
from
the
Vacc
ine
Fund
to 3
6 de
velo
ping
co
untry
gov
ernm
ent h
ealth
pro
gram
s ov
er fi
ve y
ears
; Dev
elop
ed a
new
va
ccin
e pr
ocur
emen
t sys
tem
that
gi
ves
man
ufac
ture
rs lo
ng-te
rm
purc
hasi
ng c
omm
itmen
ts, a
llow
ing
them
to re
spon
d to
the
need
s of
the
poor
est p
eopl
e; C
reat
ed a
via
ble
mar
ket i
n po
or c
ount
ries
for
soph
istic
ated
vac
cine
s in
crea
se
reso
urce
s to
brin
g to
mar
ket t
hree
va
ccin
es in
late
sta
ges
of
deve
lopm
ent.
38
Glo
bal M
icro
nutri
ent
Initi
ativ
e To
cat
alyz
e th
e gl
obal
elim
inat
ion
of
mic
ronu
trien
t mal
nutri
tion
thou
gh a
co
mbi
natio
n of
adv
ocac
y an
d te
chni
cal,
finan
cial
, and
ope
ratio
nal
supp
ort;
To p
rovi
de a
stim
ulus
to
stre
ngth
en a
nd e
xpan
d nu
tritio
n pr
ogra
ms
arou
nd th
e w
orld
.
Gen
eral
adv
ocac
y w
ork,
vita
min
A
supp
lem
enta
tion
dist
ribut
ion
univ
ersa
l sal
t iod
izat
ion,
and
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f dou
ble
forti
fied
salt.
Br
oker
ing
com
mon
sta
ndar
ds fo
r fo
rtifie
d fo
ods.
Laun
chin
g a
maj
or n
ew p
ublic
/priv
ate
initi
ativ
e on
food
forti
ficat
ion;
Im
plem
entin
g a
maj
or P
R c
ampa
ign
abou
t iro
n de
ficie
ncy
anem
ia
This
is th
e la
st y
ear o
f sup
port
from
th
e W
orld
Ban
k to
the
Mic
ronu
trien
t In
itiat
ive.
39
Popu
latio
n an
d R
epro
duct
ive
Hea
lth
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g Pr
ogra
m (P
RH
)
The
PRH
pro
gram
aim
s to
bui
ld th
e ca
paci
ty o
f civ
il-so
ciet
y or
gani
zatio
ns to
dev
elop
and
im
plem
ent c
ultu
rally
app
ropr
iate
in
terv
entio
ns in
the
sens
itive
fiel
ds
of p
opul
atio
n an
d re
prod
uctiv
e he
alth
, lea
ding
to h
ealth
ier b
ehav
ior
at in
divi
dual
and
com
mun
ity le
vels
, an
d im
prov
ed re
prod
uctiv
e he
alth
ou
tcom
es.
On-
gran
ting
thro
ugh
inte
rnat
iona
l in
term
edia
ries
with
link
s to
gr
assr
oots
gro
ups
wor
ld-w
ide;
Su
ppor
t to
oper
atio
ns re
sear
ch
lead
ing
to th
e de
velo
pmen
t of c
ost-
effe
ctiv
e in
terv
entio
ns a
nd
prot
ocol
s· S
uppo
rt to
org
aniz
atio
ns
activ
e in
tech
nolo
gy a
nd in
form
atio
n tra
nsfe
r to
com
mun
ity le
vels
Tech
nolo
gy d
evel
opm
ent a
nd
trans
fer;
Sust
aini
ng th
e m
omen
tum
of
the
Safe
Mot
herh
ood
Initi
ativ
e;
Leve
ragi
ng s
igni
fican
t fin
anci
al a
nd
tech
nica
l sup
port
for t
he p
rogr
ams;
Pi
lotin
g an
d re
plic
atio
n; C
ultu
rally
ap
prop
riate
app
roac
hes
to fe
mal
e ge
nita
l mut
ilatio
n.
Long
-term
DG
F su
ppor
t is
requ
este
d fo
r thi
s pr
ogra
m, g
iven
(i)
its c
entra
lity
to th
e “u
nfin
ishe
d ag
enda
” of r
epro
duct
ive
heal
th
iden
tifie
d as
a p
riorit
y fo
r the
Ban
k in
the
SSP,
and
(ii)
its c
ontri
butio
n to
pov
erty
redu
ctio
n th
roug
h su
ppor
t to
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f sus
tain
able
pr
ogra
ms
and
orga
niza
tions
at
com
mun
ity le
vel.
45 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
40
R
oll B
ack
Mal
aria
To
real
ize
its g
oal o
f hal
ving
the
glob
al m
alar
ia b
urde
n by
the
year
20
10, R
BM s
eeks
a 3
0-fo
ld
expa
nsio
n in
the
prop
ortio
n of
peo
ple
who
can
get
effe
ctiv
e tre
atm
ent,
idea
lly w
ithin
two
hour
s tra
vel o
f the
on
set o
f sym
ptom
s, a
nd in
thos
e w
ho
use
treat
ed b
ed n
ets.
Advo
cacy
; Glo
bal R
ule
Setti
ng;
Res
earc
h; K
now
ledg
e M
anag
emen
t; D
onor
/Par
tner
; R
esou
rce
Mob
ilizat
ion
Assi
stan
ce in
car
ryin
g ou
t reg
ular
su
perv
isio
n, m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n of
mal
aria
act
iviti
es a
nd in
im
plem
entin
g ra
tiona
l ant
imal
aria
l dr
ug p
olic
ies
with
in th
e co
ntex
t of
natio
nal e
ssen
tial d
rug
prog
ram
s;
Trai
ning
mat
eria
ls a
nd tr
eatm
ent
guid
elin
es; S
uppo
rt to
iden
tify
deve
lopm
ent p
roje
cts
for l
inka
ge to
R
BM in
terv
entio
ns; S
uppo
rt to
m
obiliz
e re
sour
ces
for R
BM
impl
emen
tatio
n.
Sust
aini
ng p
rogr
am a
ctiv
ities
will
be
acco
mpl
ishe
d th
roug
h in
crea
sed
reco
gniz
ed c
redi
bilit
y of
the
inst
itutio
n an
d of
the
activ
ities
, w
hich
will
incr
easi
ngly
be
supp
orte
d by
oth
er fi
nanc
iers
, and
ben
efic
iary
co
untri
es th
emse
lves
41
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e fo
r R
esea
rch
and
Trai
ning
in
Tro
pica
l Dis
ease
s (T
DR
)
Two-
fold
obj
ectiv
e of
rese
arch
and
de
velo
pmen
t of n
ew a
nd im
prov
ed
tool
s fo
r the
con
trol o
f six
maj
or
tropi
cal d
isea
ses
and
the
stre
ngth
enin
g of
nat
iona
l res
earc
h ca
pabi
litie
s in
cou
ntrie
s w
here
the
dise
ases
are
end
emic
.
Basi
c an
d st
rate
gic
rese
arch
; pr
oduc
t res
earc
h an
d de
velo
pmen
t; fie
ld re
sear
ch; a
nd th
e tra
inin
g of
hu
man
reso
urce
s an
d re
sear
ch
capa
bilit
y st
reng
then
ing.
The
impl
emen
tatio
n of
larg
e-sc
ale,
m
ulti-
cent
ric fi
eld
stud
ies
at th
e gl
obal
leve
l, co
mbi
ned
with
su
cces
sful
coo
rdin
atio
n of
div
erse
pa
rtner
s an
d a
dedi
catio
n to
in
corp
orat
ing
scie
ntifi
c an
d te
chno
logi
cal a
dvan
ces
in re
sear
ch
activ
ities
, has
resu
lted
in n
ew d
rugs
fo
r mal
aria
, onc
hoce
rcia
sis,
sc
hist
osom
iais
, and
Afri
can
trypa
noso
mia
sis,
and
a fi
led
test
of a
pr
elim
inar
y va
ccin
e fo
r mal
aria
. It h
as
crea
ted
new
ther
apeu
tic p
roce
dure
s su
ch a
s m
ulti-
drug
ther
apy
for
lepr
osy
and
vect
or c
ontro
l met
hods
ag
ains
t the
bla
ckfly
and
the
vect
ors
of C
haga
s di
seas
e.
The
TDR
has
an
open
-end
ed ti
me
fram
e. T
he B
ank
has
been
invo
lved
w
ith T
DR
sin
ce it
s in
cept
ion,
with
a
full
unde
rsta
ndin
g th
at c
omba
ting
them
wou
ld ta
ke a
long
-term
co
mm
itmen
t. Th
roug
h its
inte
rnal
revi
ew
mec
hani
sm th
e Pr
ogra
m “e
xits
” fro
m d
isea
ses
once
tool
s be
com
e av
aila
ble.
Annex H 46
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
42
Sp
ecia
l Pro
gram
me
of
Res
earc
h,
Dev
elop
men
t &
Res
earc
h Tr
aini
ng in
H
uman
Rep
rodu
ctio
n (H
RP)
HR
P w
as fo
unde
d in
197
2 as
a
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e of
WH
O to
su
ppor
t and
eva
luat
e in
tern
atio
nal
rese
arch
and
dev
elop
men
t rel
ated
to
hum
an re
prod
uctio
n - w
ith
parti
cula
r ref
eren
ce to
the
need
s of
de
velo
ping
cou
ntrie
s.
Coo
rdin
atio
n of
rese
arch
thro
ugh
a gl
obal
net
wor
k of
rese
arch
in
stitu
tions
, and
sec
ond,
bui
ldin
g of
na
tiona
l cap
acity
in fe
rtilit
y an
d re
prod
uctiv
e he
alth
rese
arch
.
HR
P ha
s de
velo
ped
two
mon
thly
in
ject
able
con
trace
ptiv
es; C
linic
al
trial
s do
ne b
y H
RP
have
doc
umen
ted
the
safe
ty a
nd re
lativ
e ef
ficac
y of
di
ffere
nt m
etho
ds o
f em
erge
ncy
cont
race
ptio
n; L
arge
HR
P cl
inic
al
trial
s ha
ve p
ut to
rest
the
notio
n th
at
vase
ctom
y co
uld
incr
ease
the
inci
denc
e of
car
diov
ascu
lar d
isea
ses
and
of te
stic
ular
and
pro
stat
e ca
ncer
; H
RP
rese
arch
pla
yed
a m
ajor
role
in
clar
ifyin
g th
e is
sue
of h
orm
onal
co
ntra
cept
ives
and
can
cer;
HR
P’s
spon
sore
d ba
sic
and
clin
ical
re
sear
ch h
as d
emon
stra
ted
the
syne
rgis
tic e
ffect
of a
ntip
roge
stin
s an
d pr
osta
glan
dins
; HR
P’s
ongo
ing
colla
bora
tive
wor
k on
car
diov
ascu
lar
dise
ase
and
ster
oida
l hor
mon
e co
ntra
cept
ion
has
rece
ntly
repo
rted
orig
inal
find
ings
of g
reat
gen
eral
im
porta
nce.
The
rese
arch
and
trai
ning
pro
vide
d by
HR
P is
an
on-g
oing
nee
d.
Perio
dic
revi
ews
are
cond
ucte
d to
de
term
ine
whe
ther
the
curre
nt le
vel
of s
uppo
rt sh
ould
be
cont
inue
d fo
r at
leas
t fiv
e ye
ars.
43
Stop
TB
To a
chie
ve g
loba
l aw
aren
ess
that
TB
is a
prio
rity
prob
lem
for h
ealth
, so
cial
and
eco
nom
ic s
ecto
rs; T
o ex
pand
the
glob
al p
artn
ersh
ip fo
r a
broa
der,
inte
rsec
tora
l res
pons
e an
d m
obilis
atio
n of
nec
essa
ry h
uman
an
d fin
anci
al re
sour
ces;
To
anal
yse
the
maj
or p
oliti
cal o
bsta
cles
and
te
chni
cal c
onst
rain
ts to
TB
cont
rol
and
iden
tify
impr
oved
sol
utio
ns th
at
supp
ort c
ount
ry a
ctio
n; T
o ac
hiev
e te
chni
cal c
onse
nsus
and
impr
oved
co
ordi
natio
n am
ong
TB s
peci
alis
ts,
heal
th le
ader
s, d
onor
s, N
GO
s an
d go
vern
men
ts
Prom
ote
wid
er a
nd w
iser
use
of
exis
ting
stra
tegi
es to
inte
rrupt
TB
trans
mis
sion
; Ada
pt e
xist
ing
stra
tegi
es to
add
ress
the
chal
leng
es
pose
d by
em
ergi
ng th
reat
s;
Acce
lera
te e
limin
atio
n of
TB.
Doc
umen
ted
expa
nsio
n of
acc
ess
to,
and
resu
lts fr
om, t
he W
HO
-re
com
men
ded
TB c
ontro
l stra
tegy
(D
OTS
) will
be a
vaila
ble
(incl
udin
g ca
se c
over
age,
pop
ulat
ion
cove
rage
, an
d tre
atm
ent o
utco
mes
) fro
m W
HO
an
d ot
her p
artn
ers
wor
king
in th
e fie
ld. I
nfor
mat
ion
on in
crea
ses
in
loca
l and
ext
erna
l fin
anci
ng o
f TB
cont
rol e
fforts
sho
uld
also
be
avai
labl
e. P
ublic
info
rmat
ion
docu
men
ts, m
edia
mat
eria
ls, i
nter
net
new
slet
ters
and
web
site
do
cum
enta
tion
will
be a
vaila
ble.
The
Stop
TB
Initi
ativ
e w
as la
unch
ed
as a
two-
year
act
ivity
, 199
9-20
00.
How
ever
, as
its w
ork
prog
ram
has
ev
olve
d, it
s pa
rtner
s ha
ve a
gree
d th
at it
mus
t con
tinue
to o
pera
te a
t le
ast u
ntil
2005
. Th
e St
op T
B In
itiat
ive
is e
xpec
ted
to
be tr
ansf
orm
ed in
to a
long
-term
pa
rtner
ship
. It i
s pr
opos
ed th
at th
e D
GF
reco
nsid
er w
heth
er m
ulti-
year
fu
ndin
g (F
Y200
3-20
04) i
s w
arra
nted
pr
ior t
o th
e co
nclu
sion
of F
Y200
2.
47 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
44
U
nite
d N
atio
ns
Adm
inis
trativ
e an
d C
oord
inat
ing
Com
mitt
ee,
Sub-
Com
mitt
ee o
n N
utrit
ion
The
man
date
of t
he A
CC
/SC
N is
to
rais
e aw
aren
ess
of n
utrit
ion
prob
lem
s an
d to
mob
ilize
com
mitm
ent t
o so
lve
them
– a
t gl
obal
, reg
iona
l and
nat
iona
l lev
els;
to
refin
e th
e di
rect
ion,
incr
ease
the
scal
e an
d st
reng
then
the
cohe
renc
e an
d im
pact
of a
ctio
ns a
gain
st
mal
nutri
tion
wor
ld w
ide;
and
to
prom
ote
co-o
pera
tion
amon
gst U
N
agen
cies
and
par
tner
org
aniz
atio
ns
in s
uppo
rt of
nat
iona
l effo
rts to
end
m
alnu
tritio
n in
this
gen
erat
ion.
The
SCN
con
vene
s w
orki
ng g
roup
s on
spe
cial
ized
are
as o
f nut
ritio
n;
curre
ntly
ther
e ar
e ni
ne w
orki
ng
grou
ps in
are
as ra
ngin
g fro
m fe
tal
and
infa
nt m
alnu
tritio
n, n
utrit
ion
of
the
scho
ol a
ged
child
, and
ho
useh
old
food
sec
urity
to c
apac
ity
build
ing.
45
UN
AID
S To
redu
ce th
e tra
nsm
issi
on o
f H
IV/A
IDS,
to p
rovi
de a
fford
able
, co
st-e
ffect
ive
care
for p
erso
ns li
ving
w
ith H
IV/A
IDS,
and
to m
itiga
te th
e im
pact
of H
IV/A
IDS
on in
divi
dual
s,
hous
ehol
ds, a
nd c
omm
uniti
es.
Accu
rate
HIV
/AID
S su
rvei
llanc
e;
dire
ct s
uppo
rt to
cou
ntrie
s un
derta
king
stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ng;
mob
ilizin
g co
mm
itmen
t, an
d br
oker
ing
allia
nces
.
Dev
elop
inte
grat
ed w
orkp
lans
and
cl
early
def
ined
stra
tegi
es to
sup
port
natio
nal p
rogr
ams;
Dev
elop
and
di
ssem
inat
ed g
uide
lines
on
resu
lts-
base
d m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n fo
r co
mpr
ehen
sive
and
mul
tisec
tora
l re
spon
ses
to H
IV/A
IDS.
Ada
pted
na
tiona
l rep
rodu
ctiv
e he
alth
pol
icie
s an
d pr
ogra
ms.
HIV
/AID
S w
ill re
quire
a lo
ng-te
rm
com
mitm
ent f
rom
the
UN
AID
S C
ospo
nsor
s an
d pa
rtner
or
gani
zatio
ns.
H
EALT
H –
NO
N-D
GF
46
Com
mis
sion
on
Mac
roec
onom
ics
and
Hea
lth
To a
naly
ze th
e im
pact
of h
ealth
on
deve
lopm
ent;
To p
rodu
ce re
ports
an
d sc
hola
rly s
tudi
es o
n he
alth
-re
late
d in
terv
entio
ns a
nd th
eir
impa
ct o
n ec
onom
ic g
row
th a
nd
equi
ty in
dev
elop
ing
coun
tries
; R
ecom
men
d a
set o
f hea
lth
mea
sure
men
t to
min
imiz
e po
verty
an
d m
axim
ize
econ
omic
de
velo
pmen
t in
deve
lopi
ng
coun
tries
.
The
wor
king
gro
ups
will
take
sto
ck
of e
xist
ing
know
ledg
e ba
se in
ord
er
to id
entif
y im
plic
atio
ns fo
r pol
icy
rath
er th
an g
ener
ate
new
kn
owle
dge.
The
gro
ups
are
expe
cted
to c
onsu
lt w
idel
y w
ith
deve
lopi
ng c
ount
ry p
olic
y m
aker
s an
d pr
ofes
sion
als
as p
art o
f the
ir w
ork.
Wor
king
Pap
ers
47
Lym
phat
ic F
ilaria
sis
The
obje
ctiv
e of
the
prog
ram
is to
el
imin
ate
the
Lym
phat
ic F
ilaria
sis
dise
ase.
Thi
s is
con
sist
ent w
ith th
e Ba
nk p
olic
y of
pov
erty
redu
ctio
n an
d ta
rget
ing
the
poor
est i
n ru
ral a
reas
in
thes
e co
untri
es.
Dev
elop
sta
ndar
dize
d te
chni
cal
guid
elin
es, t
rain
ing
mat
eria
ls, a
nd
cond
uct o
pera
tiona
l res
earc
h.
Con
duct
inte
nsiv
ely
mon
itore
d de
mon
stra
tion
proj
ects
Map
ping
of
LF a
nd c
apac
ity b
uild
ing,
fello
wsh
ips,
an
d da
ta a
naly
sis.
Su
ppor
t cou
ntry
-leve
l act
iviti
es in
su
ppor
t of M
inis
tries
of H
ealth
and
to
assi
st n
atio
nal L
F ta
sk fo
rces
.
Annex H 48
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
SOC
IAL
PRO
TEC
TIO
N –
NO
N-D
GF
48
Soci
al P
rote
ctio
n fo
r th
e In
form
al E
cono
my
Impr
ove
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
risk
s fa
ced
by in
form
al s
ecto
r wor
kers
an
d po
tent
ially
effe
ctiv
e so
cial
pr
otec
tion
inte
rven
tions
.
The
partn
ersh
ip h
as h
eld
2 se
min
ars
at th
e Ba
nk o
ver t
he la
st
year
to ra
ise
awar
enes
s of
info
rmal
se
ctor
soc
ial p
rote
ctio
n is
sues
. C
urre
ntly
, wor
k is
und
erw
ay o
n tw
o in
-dep
th s
ecto
r stu
dies
.
49
Und
erst
andi
ng
Chi
ldre
n’s
Wor
k Im
prov
e ch
ild la
bor r
esea
rch,
dat
a co
llect
ion
and
data
ana
lysi
s;
Enha
nce
capa
city
of c
hild
labo
r dat
a co
llect
ion
and
rese
arch
, esp
ecia
lly
at th
e lo
cal a
nd n
atio
nal l
evel
; and
to
Impr
ove
impa
ct a
sses
smen
ts o
f in
terv
entio
ns a
gain
st c
hild
labo
r.
Dat
a m
appi
ng a
nd a
naly
sis;
Pro
ject
m
appi
ng a
nd a
naly
sis;
and
Kn
owle
dge
shar
ing
Seve
ral d
atab
ases
con
tain
ing
info
rmat
ion
that
is p
ertin
ent t
o ch
ild
labo
r res
earc
h ha
ve b
een
crea
ted
and
post
ed o
n a
web
site
.
IN
FOR
MA
TIO
N S
OLU
TIO
NS
GR
OU
P –
DG
F
50
Dev
elop
men
t Gat
eway
Fo
unda
tion
The
Dev
elop
men
t Gat
eway
Fo
unda
tion
is p
ropo
sed
as a
ca
taly
st to
sup
port
curre
nt e
fforts
to
use
Info
rmat
ion
and
Com
mun
icat
ion
Tech
nolo
gies
(IC
T) in
the
fight
ag
ains
t pov
erty
. It i
s in
tend
ed to
ha
rmon
ize
and
put i
nto
effe
ct
prog
ram
idea
s an
d in
itiat
ives
now
un
derta
ken
by d
iffer
ent
deve
lopm
ent s
take
hold
ers
and
partn
ers
incl
udin
g th
e W
orld
Ban
k to
cl
ose
the
“dig
ital d
ivid
e”.
Cre
ate
a kn
owle
dge
reso
urce
a
foru
m fo
r dis
cuss
ions
; Org
aniz
e sy
mpo
sia
to e
xcha
nge
idea
s ar
ound
“d
igita
l div
ide”
; Pro
mot
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f a n
etw
ork
of
expe
rts o
n IC
T de
velo
pmen
t; Es
tabl
ish
a re
sear
ch a
nd tr
aini
ng
cent
er; P
rovi
de s
eed
fund
ing
to
sele
cted
ICT
proj
ects
and
pr
ogra
ms;
Pr
omot
e kn
owle
dge
shar
ing.
Gat
eway
ser
vice
s w
ill in
clud
e on
line
train
ing
mod
ules
, res
earc
h fin
ding
s,
best
pra
ctic
es a
nd id
eas,
cas
e st
udie
s, p
rocu
rem
ent s
ervi
ces,
in
form
atio
n on
dev
elop
men
t pro
ject
s,
fund
ing,
com
mer
cial
opp
ortu
nitie
s,
prod
uct r
evie
ws,
new
s, jo
bs, a
nd
dire
ctor
ies.
The
Bank
’s c
ontin
ued
parti
cipa
tion
in
the
Foun
datio
n w
ill ne
ed to
be
asse
ssed
dur
ing
the
next
thre
e ye
ars,
bas
ed o
n th
e ef
fect
iven
ess
of
the
Foun
datio
n in
mob
ilizin
g pr
ojec
ts
and
cred
ibly
add
ress
ing
the
digi
tal
divi
de. A
t the
end
of t
his
perio
d, it
is
expe
cted
that
the
Foun
datio
n w
ould
un
derg
o an
ext
erna
l eva
luat
ion
to
certi
fy it
s ef
fect
iven
ess,
and
ane
w
roun
d of
fina
ncin
g m
ay b
e in
itiat
ed a
t th
at p
oint
tim
e. A
t thi
s ju
nctu
re, t
he
Wor
ld B
ank
coul
d ag
ain
cons
ider
its
leve
l of c
omm
itmen
t to
this
pa
rtner
ship
.
PREM
NET
WO
RK
– D
GF
51
Forg
ing
Partn
ersh
ips
for G
ood
Gov
erna
nce
in P
ublic
Exp
endi
ture
an
d R
ecor
ds
Man
agem
ent
The
mai
n pu
rpos
e of
the
gran
t is
to
focu
s m
ore
dono
r res
ourc
es, i
n a
coor
dina
ted
way
, tow
ard
the
refo
rm
of p
ublic
exp
endi
ture
and
reco
rds
man
agem
ent s
yste
ms
in d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es.
Prep
arat
ion
of a
set
of i
nteg
rate
d di
agno
stic
tool
s to
hel
p as
sess
the
publ
ic e
xpen
ditu
re, a
ccou
ntab
ility,
an
d re
cord
-kee
ping
sys
tem
s of
cl
ient
cou
ntrie
s; S
uppo
rting
a s
et o
f in
-dep
th d
iagn
ostic
exe
rcis
es in
se
lect
ed d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es;
Dis
sem
inat
ion
of th
e di
agno
stic
to
ols,
less
ons
of p
ast e
xper
ienc
e,
and
deve
lopi
ng c
ount
ry
asse
ssm
ents
and
act
ion
plan
s.
An in
tegr
ated
set
of t
ools
and
te
chni
ques
to a
naly
ze a
nd a
ddre
ss
issu
es o
f pub
lic e
xpen
ditu
re
man
agem
ent a
nd re
cord
-kee
ping
; Ac
tion
plan
s se
tting
out
cle
ar s
teps
to
war
ds im
prov
emen
ts in
pub
lic
expe
nditu
re m
anag
emen
t, ac
coun
tabi
lity,
and
/or r
ecor
d-ke
epin
g sy
stem
s in
bot
h th
e sh
ort-
and
med
ium
-term
.
The
prog
ram
is e
xpec
ted
to b
e co
mpl
eted
in F
Y04.
An
inde
pend
ent
eval
uatio
n in
FY0
4 w
ill he
lp
dete
rmin
e w
hat t
ype
of fo
llow
-up
wou
ld b
e de
sira
ble.
49 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
52
G
loba
l Dev
elop
men
t N
etw
ork
The
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent N
etw
ork
is
a w
orld
wid
e as
soci
atio
n of
rese
arch
an
d po
licy
inst
itute
s w
hose
goa
l is
to c
reat
e, s
hare
, and
app
ly to
pol
icy
mul
tidis
cipl
inar
y kn
owle
dge
for t
he
purp
ose
of d
evel
opm
ent.
The
GD
N ra
ises
fund
s fro
m d
onor
go
vern
men
ts a
nd p
ublic
and
priv
ate
inst
itutio
ns to
pro
vide
gra
nts
to
rese
arch
inst
itute
s in
the
deve
lopi
ng
wor
ld th
roug
h th
e re
gion
al re
sear
ch
com
petit
ions
; Glo
bal R
esea
rch
Proj
ect;
Dat
a In
itiat
ive;
A s
erie
s of
re
gion
al a
nd in
tern
atio
nal m
eetin
gs
aim
ed a
t dis
sem
inat
ing
rese
arch
an
d cr
eatin
g a
foru
m fo
r int
erac
tion
with
pol
icym
aker
s; S
chol
arsh
ip
Prog
ram
s; G
loba
l Aw
ards
.
GD
N h
as s
uppo
rted
and
linke
d re
sear
ch in
stitu
tes
that
gen
erat
e,
shar
e an
d ap
ply
know
ledg
e ab
out
deve
lopm
ent.
To fo
ster
new
kn
owle
dge,
GD
N re
gion
al n
etw
orks
es
tabl
ishe
d co
mpe
titiv
e pe
er-re
view
gr
ant m
echa
nism
s an
d di
strib
uted
m
illion
s of
dol
lars
in re
sear
ch g
rant
s to
dev
elop
ing
coun
try in
stitu
tes.
GD
N
faci
litat
es k
now
ledg
e sh
arin
g th
roug
h re
gion
al c
onfe
renc
es, t
he a
nnua
l G
DN
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent
Con
fere
nce,
and
thro
ugh
elec
troni
c to
ols:
a m
onth
ly e
-mai
l new
slet
ter,
onlin
e di
scus
sion
s, a
nd
ww
w.g
dnet
.org
, the
GD
N w
eb s
ite.
The
gove
rnin
g bo
dy w
ill re
view
G
DN
’s lo
catio
n at
its
annu
al
mee
ting
in D
ecem
ber 2
003,
thre
e ye
ars
afte
r the
bod
y w
as
esta
blis
hed.
At t
hat t
ime,
the
gove
rnin
g bo
dy w
ill ex
plor
e op
tions
fo
r loc
atin
g G
DN
in a
dev
elop
ing
coun
try. I
t wou
ld a
lso
be
appr
opria
te a
t thi
s tim
e to
hav
e a
full-
scal
e ev
alua
tion
of th
e ac
tiviti
es
supp
orte
d by
GD
N. I
n th
e ev
ent t
hat
the
activ
ities
sup
porte
d by
GD
N a
re
not d
eem
ed w
orth
whi
le a
nd th
ere
is
little
evi
denc
e of
don
or s
uppo
rt,
DG
F fu
ndin
g sh
ould
be
term
inat
ed.
In th
e ev
ent t
hat t
he a
ctiv
ities
are
co
nsid
ered
wor
thw
hile
and
ther
e is
si
gnifi
cant
don
or p
artic
ipat
ion,
then
D
GF
shou
ld re
mai
n as
a s
pons
or.
53
Inte
grat
ed F
ram
ewor
k fo
r Tra
de
To a
ssis
t the
leas
t dev
elop
ed
coun
tries
(LD
Cs)
bet
ter t
o in
tegr
ate
into
the
wor
ld e
cono
my
and
the
mul
tilat
eral
trad
ing
syst
em a
s a
basi
s fo
r sus
tain
able
gro
wth
and
po
verty
redu
ctio
n.
Stre
ngth
enin
g co
ordi
natio
n be
twee
n pa
rtici
patin
g ag
enci
es a
nd d
onor
co
untri
es. P
rovi
sion
of t
rade
-rela
ted
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce.
Ass
ista
nce
in
prep
arat
ion
of “t
rade
inte
grat
ion
stra
tegy
cha
pter
s” in
PR
SPs.
Trad
e in
tegr
atio
n st
rate
gy p
aper
s.
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g pr
ojec
ts.
Expe
cted
that
don
ors
will
even
tual
ly
supp
ort t
he p
rogr
am in
depe
nden
tly.
In th
ree
year
s (b
y FY
04),
trade
po
licy
refo
rms
shou
ld h
ave
been
m
ains
tream
ed in
Ban
k w
ork
in
LDC
s.
54
Partn
ersh
ips
in
Stat
istic
s fo
r the
21st
C
entu
ry
The
Partn
ersh
ip in
Sta
tistic
s fo
r D
evel
opm
ent a
nd P
over
ty
Red
uctio
n pr
ogra
m a
ddre
sses
the
need
of h
eavi
ly in
debt
ed p
oor
coun
tries
to in
crea
se th
eir c
apac
ity
to p
rodu
ce g
ood
qual
ity s
tatis
tics
for
com
preh
ensi
ve a
nti-p
over
ty
stra
tegi
es a
nd to
mon
itor a
nd
eval
uate
the
impa
ct o
f pov
erty
-re
duct
ion
prog
ram
s.
The
wor
k pr
ogra
m in
clud
es s
ix ta
sk
team
s as
wel
l as
annu
al c
onso
rtium
m
eetin
gs. I
n FY
00/0
1 th
e ta
sk
team
s w
ere
esta
blis
hed
and
wor
k pr
ogra
ms
agre
ed. A
ctiv
ities
will
cont
inue
in F
Y01/
02, w
ith s
peci
fic
prod
ucts
bei
ng p
rodu
ced
on
advo
cacy
, inf
orm
atio
n ex
chan
ge
and
indi
cato
rs. A
full
cons
ortiu
m
mee
ting
will
be in
Oct
ober
200
1.
Glo
bal a
ctiv
ities
(tas
k fo
rces
, re
sear
ch, r
epor
ts).
Reg
iona
l se
min
ars
and
wor
ksho
ps.
Cou
ntry
-sp
ecifi
c ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
prog
ram
s.
Spec
ific
prod
ucts
on
advo
cacy
, in
form
atio
n ex
chan
ge, a
nd p
over
ty
indi
cato
rs.
As d
iscu
ssed
in th
e FY
01
appl
icat
ion
it is
ant
icip
ated
that
this
pr
ogra
m w
ill be
fund
ed fo
r tw
o ye
ars
by D
GF.
Afte
r tes
ting
of th
e pl
an h
as b
een
com
plet
ed in
a
suffi
cien
t num
ber o
f cou
ntrie
s, th
e D
GF
supp
orte
d po
rtion
of t
he
PAR
IS21
con
sorti
um w
ill w
ithdr
aw
whi
le o
ther
act
iviti
es o
n st
atis
tical
ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
will
cont
inue
.
PREM
NET
WO
RK
– N
ON
-DG
F
55
DAC
Net
wor
k on
Goo
d G
over
nanc
e an
d C
apac
ity D
evel
opm
ent
(GO
VNET
)
The
DAC
Net
wor
k on
Goo
d G
over
nanc
e an
d C
apac
ity
Dev
elop
men
t (G
OVN
ET) i
s de
vote
d to
impr
ovin
g th
e ef
fect
iven
ess
of
dono
r ass
ista
nce
in k
ey g
over
nanc
e ar
eas
and
to s
harin
g be
st p
ract
ices
on
inno
vativ
e ap
proa
ches
to
stre
ngth
en c
apac
ities
for
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent.
Res
earc
h an
d di
ssem
inat
ion.
N
etw
orki
ng.
Key
area
s of
wor
k in
clud
e an
ti-co
rrupt
ion,
pub
lic s
ecto
r ref
orm
and
gu
idan
ce o
n pr
inci
ples
for
enga
gem
ent w
ith c
ount
ries
with
se
vere
gov
erna
nce
prob
lem
s.
Dis
sem
inat
ion
of re
sear
ch a
nd
findi
ngs
on b
est p
ract
ices
. N
one.
Annex H 50
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
PSI N
ETW
OR
K –
DG
F
56
Busi
ness
Par
tner
s fo
r D
evel
opm
ent
The
obje
ctiv
e of
BPD
is to
stu
dy,
supp
ort,
and
prom
ote
stra
tegi
c ex
ampl
es o
f par
tner
ship
s, in
volv
ing
busi
ness
, gov
ernm
ent a
nd c
ivil
soci
ety,
wor
king
for t
he
deve
lopm
ent o
f com
mun
ities
aro
und
the
wor
ld.
BPD
aim
s to
pro
duce
sol
id e
vide
nce
of th
e po
sitiv
e im
pact
of t
ri-se
ctor
pa
rtner
ship
s –
both
the
deve
lopm
enta
l im
pact
and
the
busi
ness
impa
ct.
Rou
ndta
bles
/wor
ksho
ps; S
tudy
vi
sits
; Tra
inin
g;
Res
earc
h.
G
iven
the
indi
cativ
e re
sults
we
have
se
en in
som
e of
the
focu
s pr
ojec
ts,
it is
ant
icip
ated
that
ther
e w
ill be
a
dem
and
for B
PD le
arni
ng b
eyon
d th
e lif
etim
e of
the
initi
ativ
e (D
ecem
ber 2
001)
. Opt
ions
for ‘
post
-20
01’ C
lust
er a
ctiv
ity a
re c
urre
ntly
be
ing
cons
ider
ed b
y ex
istin
g pa
rtner
s.
57
Citi
es A
llianc
e To
impr
ove
the
livin
g co
nditi
ons
of
the
urba
n po
or th
roug
h ac
tion
in tw
o ke
y ar
eas:
City
dev
elop
men
t st
rate
gies
, whi
ch re
flect
a s
hare
d vi
sion
for t
he c
ity’s
futu
re a
nd lo
cal
prio
ritie
s fo
r act
ion
to re
duce
urb
an
pove
rty; C
ities
with
out s
lum
s,
thro
ugh
city
wid
e an
d na
tionw
ide
upgr
adin
g of
low
-inco
me
settl
emen
ts to
impr
ove
the
livel
ihoo
ds o
f the
urb
an p
oor.
Dev
elop
act
ion
plan
to im
prov
e liv
es
of 1
00 m
illion
slu
m d
wel
lers
by
2020
; Hol
istic
city
dev
elop
men
t st
rate
gies
- de
fine
role
s of
all
stak
ehol
ders
in im
plem
enta
tion;
C
ityw
ide
and
natio
nwid
e sc
ales
of
actio
n –
focu
s on
sca
ling-
up a
nd
sust
aina
bilit
y; B
uild
pol
itica
l will
– de
mon
stra
te th
at s
lum
s ar
e no
t in
evita
ble;
Par
tner
ship
s –
expa
nd
the
leve
l of r
esou
rces
reac
hing
the
urba
n po
or.
Th
e C
ities
Allia
nce
is e
xpec
ted
to
dise
ngag
e fro
m th
e D
GF
for f
undi
ng
of th
e in
-hou
se S
ecre
taria
t at t
he
end
of F
Y02;
fund
ing
for t
he
Secr
etar
iat w
ill be
tran
sitio
ned
to
the
Citi
es A
llianc
e Tr
ust F
und.
The
lo
nger
-term
stra
tegy
for
dise
ngag
emen
t fro
m D
GF
for
fund
ing
for p
rogr
amm
atic
act
iviti
es
has
not b
een
deve
lope
d.
58
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up to
As
sist
the
Poor
est
The
obje
ctiv
e of
the
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up to
Ass
ist t
he P
oore
st (C
GAP
) is
to im
prov
e th
e qu
ality
and
in
crea
se th
e av
aila
bilit
y of
fina
ncia
l se
rvic
es to
the
poor
, and
esp
ecia
lly
the
very
poo
r. To
ach
ieve
this
end
, C
GAP
wor
ks w
ith th
ree
maj
or
grou
ps o
f clie
nts:
loca
l-lev
el
mic
rofin
ance
inst
itutio
ns (M
FIs)
and
pr
actit
ione
rs, d
onor
org
aniz
atio
ns,
and
the
mic
rofin
ance
indu
stry
at
larg
e.
Dire
ct in
vest
men
ts in
MFI
s,
stra
tegi
c ad
vice
and
tech
nica
l as
sist
ance
, tra
inin
g an
d ca
paci
ty
build
ing;
dev
elop
men
t of t
echn
ical
to
ols
and
serv
ices
for t
he in
dust
ry;
prod
ucin
g a
com
mon
sta
ndar
d fo
r co
nten
t and
pre
sent
atio
n of
MFI
fin
anci
al s
tate
men
ts; d
evel
oped
and
de
liver
ed tr
aini
ng fo
r aud
itors
and
su
perv
isor
s in
mic
rofin
ance
; and
de
velo
ped
an o
n-lin
e au
dit s
ervi
ce
for u
se b
y M
FIs,
don
ors,
inve
stor
s an
d au
dito
rs.
It is
exp
ecte
d th
at la
rge
num
bers
of
poor
peo
ple
will
gain
acc
ess
to
mic
rofin
ance
, ena
blin
g th
em to
re
aliz
e ec
onom
ic o
ppor
tuni
ties
and
incr
ease
inco
me.
CG
AP’s
cur
rent
man
date
runs
th
roug
h FY
03. T
he re
sults
of t
he
next
eva
luat
ion,
will
serv
e as
the
basi
s fo
r the
CG
det
erm
inin
g w
heth
er to
ext
end
CG
AP in
to a
third
ph
ase
beyo
nd J
une
2003
.
51 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
59
G
loba
l Cor
pora
te
Gov
erna
nce
Foru
m
Rai
se a
war
enes
s an
d bu
ild
cons
ensu
s in
favo
r of p
olic
y,
regu
lato
ry a
nd in
stitu
tiona
l ref
orm
s in
cor
pora
te g
over
nanc
e;
to d
isse
min
ate
best
pra
ctic
e; F
und
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce
and
capa
city
bu
ildin
g; S
pons
or re
sear
ch a
nd
anal
ysis
on
the
cost
s an
d be
nefit
s of
co
rpor
ate
gove
rnan
ce re
form
s in
de
velo
ping
and
tran
sitio
n m
arke
ts.
Rai
se a
war
enes
s an
d bu
ild
cons
ensu
s, th
roug
h sy
mpo
sium
s an
d su
ppor
t for
the
OEC
D/W
orld
Ba
nk C
orpo
rate
Gov
erna
nce
Rou
ndta
bles
; dis
sem
inat
e be
st
prac
tice
thro
ugh
its w
ebsi
te a
nd
rese
arch
pub
licat
ions
, and
fund
te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e an
d ca
paci
ty
build
ing
thro
ugh
its c
o-fin
anci
ng
faci
lity.
The
Foru
m h
as s
uppo
rted
the
roun
dtab
les
prog
ram
in A
sia,
Lat
in
Amer
ica,
Eur
asia
, Rus
sia
and
plan
ning
for A
frica
, and
est
ablis
hed
a w
ebsi
te a
nd p
ublis
hed
a di
rect
ory
of
orga
niza
tions
wor
king
on
corp
orat
e go
vern
ance
wor
ldw
ide.
The
Foru
m w
ill be
est
ablis
hed
with
an
initi
al th
ree
year
life
spa
n. D
urin
g th
e th
ird y
ear o
f ope
ratio
n, th
e St
eerin
g C
omm
ittee
will
revi
ew
whe
ther
the
Foru
m is
mee
ting
its
obje
ctiv
es a
nd d
ecid
e w
heth
er it
sh
ould
con
tinue
in it
s cu
rrent
form
”.
60
Info
rmat
ion
for
Dev
elop
men
t Pro
gram
(in
foD
ev)
To e
ncou
rage
pol
icie
s w
hich
in
crea
se c
onne
ctiv
ity, a
nd
espe
cial
ly w
hich
incr
ease
the
acce
ss o
f the
poo
r to
ICT;
To
bui
ld h
uman
cap
acity
, co
nsen
sus
and
netw
orks
of i
nter
est
need
ed fo
r the
intro
duct
ion
and
utiliz
atio
n of
new
ICT
in d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es; a
nd T
o pi
lot,
dem
onst
rate
, and
lear
n fro
m
inno
vativ
e ap
plic
atio
ns o
f IC
T.
Info
Dev
pro
vide
s gr
ants
and
te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e fo
ster
ing
the
desi
gn, t
estin
g, a
nd a
pplic
atio
n of
in
nova
tive
use
of IC
Ts fo
r eco
nom
ic
and
soci
al d
evel
opm
ent a
t glo
bal,
regi
onal
, nat
iona
l, an
d lo
cal l
evel
s.
It
is e
xpec
ted
that
the
dise
ngag
emen
t stra
tegy
will
star
t in
2003
. Su
ppor
t fro
m th
e D
GF,
at t
he
requ
este
d le
vel,
is e
xpec
ted
at le
ast
thro
ugh
FY 2
004.
Sta
rting
in F
Y 03
, a
dise
ngag
emen
t pol
icy
will
be
activ
ated
. The
Wor
ld B
ank
is
expe
cted
to c
ontin
ue to
cov
er p
art
of th
e ad
min
istra
tive
cost
of t
he c
ore
info
Dev
pro
gram
via
its
adm
inis
trativ
e bu
dget
.
Annex H 52
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
61
Pr
oven
tion
Con
sorti
um
1. In
crea
se le
arni
ng a
nd th
e di
ssem
inat
ion
of g
ood
prac
tices
for
redu
cing
vul
nera
bilit
y to
nat
ural
and
te
chno
logi
cal d
isas
ters
in a
t ris
k de
velo
ping
cou
ntrie
s,
2. P
rom
ote
activ
ities
that
hel
p de
mon
stra
te ri
sk re
duct
ion
and
risk
trans
fer s
trate
gies
, 3.
Impr
ove
acce
ss o
f the
poo
r to
risk
redu
ctio
n st
rate
gies
, ins
uran
ce a
nd
safe
ty n
ets,
4.
Enh
ance
inst
itutio
nal c
apac
ity fo
r ris
k id
entif
icat
ion
and
man
agem
ent,
and
5.
Stre
ngth
en c
oope
ratio
n an
d co
ordi
natio
n be
twee
n se
ctor
s th
at
can
furth
er d
isas
ter r
educ
tion
and
deve
lopm
ent,
incl
udin
g in
tern
atio
nal
orga
niza
tions
, pub
lic a
nd p
rivat
e or
gani
zatio
ns, c
ivil
soci
ety
orga
niza
tions
, and
sci
entif
ic g
roup
s.
Ris
k id
entif
icat
ion,
the
deve
lopm
ent
of in
form
atio
n an
d an
und
erst
andi
ng
of p
hysi
cal r
isks
; Ris
k re
duct
ion,
the
deve
lopm
ent a
nd u
tiliz
atio
n of
pr
even
tion
and
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res;
Ris
k tra
nsfe
r, th
e sh
arin
g of
risk
s th
roug
h su
ch m
echa
nism
s as
insu
ranc
e, s
afet
y ne
ts, a
nd
cala
mity
fund
s; In
form
atio
n sh
arin
g,
whi
ch in
clud
es a
war
enes
s ra
isin
g,
educ
atio
n an
d tra
inin
g ef
forts
.
A pr
esid
ing
coun
cil a
nd s
teer
ing
com
mitt
ee h
ave
been
form
ed, k
ey
stak
ehol
ders
from
gov
ernm
ent,
non-
gove
rnm
ent a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
or
gani
zatio
ns a
nd a
cade
mic
in
stitu
tions
hav
e jo
ined
the
partn
ersh
ip, a
nd a
web
site
has
bee
n de
velo
ped
to fu
rther
com
mun
icat
ion
betw
een
mem
bers
and
bet
wee
n th
e C
onso
rtium
and
use
rs o
f its
em
ergi
ng
prod
ucts
.
The
plan
is to
mov
e th
e se
cret
aria
t fro
m D
MF
to IF
RC
. DM
F is
wor
king
cl
osel
y w
ith IF
RC
in o
rder
to
faci
litat
e a
smoo
th tr
ansf
er o
f thi
s fu
nctio
n. A
n IF
RC
offi
cial
cur
rent
ly
serv
es a
s ch
air o
f the
ste
erin
g co
mm
ittee
, ena
blin
g he
r to
deve
lop
a de
ep u
nder
stan
ding
of a
ll of
the
Con
sorti
um’s
ope
ratio
ns.
62
Publ
ic-P
rivat
e In
frast
ruct
ure
Advi
sory
Fa
cilit
y
PPIA
F is
a g
loba
l tec
hnic
al
assi
stan
ce fa
cilit
y de
sign
ed to
hel
p el
imin
ate
pove
rty a
nd a
chie
ve
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent i
n de
velo
ping
cou
ntrie
s by
sup
porti
ng
priv
ate
sect
or in
volv
emen
t in
infra
stru
ctur
e.
Activ
ities
incl
ude
advi
ce o
n th
e fra
min
g of
pro
-poo
r inf
rast
ruct
ure
deve
lopm
ent s
trate
gies
; the
des
ign
and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
spe
cific
re
form
s; b
uild
ing
cons
ensu
s fo
r the
ad
optio
n of
refo
rms;
and
bui
ldin
g ca
paci
ty in
des
igni
ng a
nd re
gula
ting
priv
ate
infra
stru
ctur
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
prep
arat
ion
of c
ase
stud
ies,
tool
kits
an
d ot
her p
ublic
atio
ns, a
s w
ell a
s su
ppor
t to
conf
eren
ces,
wor
ksho
ps
and
sim
ilar e
vent
s.
Sinc
e its
laun
ch in
Jul
y 19
99, P
PIAF
ha
s su
ppor
ted
63 te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce a
ctiv
ities
in 3
9 co
untri
es
in a
ll de
velo
ping
regi
ons
and
cove
ring
all i
nfra
stru
ctur
e se
ctor
s,
and
11 a
ctiv
ities
iden
tifyi
ng,
diss
emin
atin
g an
d pr
omot
ing
best
pr
actic
e.
Whi
le fo
rmal
dis
enga
gem
ent
stra
tegy
will
need
to b
e co
nsid
ered
by
the
Prog
ram
Cou
ncil,
ear
ly
indi
catio
ns s
ugge
st th
at a
noth
er
thre
e ye
ars
may
be
just
ified
und
er
Win
dow
1.
53 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
63
So
lar D
evel
opm
ent
Gro
up
The
obje
ctiv
e of
SD
G is
to in
crea
se
the
deliv
ery
of s
olar
hom
e sy
stem
s (S
HS)
and
thus
brin
g en
viro
nmen
tally
cle
an e
lect
ricity
to
rura
l hou
seho
lds
in d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es.
Mor
e sp
ecifi
cally
, the
SD
G a
ims
to
over
com
e th
e ke
y ba
rrier
s to
ac
cele
rate
d gr
owth
of p
hoto
volta
ics
(PVs
) in
the
off-g
rid s
egm
ent o
f the
el
ectri
city
mar
ket,
incl
udin
g la
ck o
f m
ediu
m-te
rm fu
ndin
g to
ena
ble
cust
omer
s to
repa
y th
e re
lativ
ely
high
initi
al c
ost o
f PV
syst
ems
over
tim
e, la
ck o
f und
erst
andi
ng o
f PV
by
conv
entio
nal f
inan
cial
inte
rmed
iarie
s (F
Is),
and
wea
k ca
pita
lizat
ion
of
man
y in
dige
nous
PV
com
pani
es.
Inve
st in
priv
ate
sect
or c
ompa
nies
in
volv
ed in
rura
l, co
mm
erci
ally
su
stai
nabl
e PV
act
iviti
es; P
rovi
de
finan
cing
to lo
cal f
inan
cial
in
term
edia
ries
who
will
serv
ice
such
co
mpa
nies
. Bus
ines
s de
velo
pmen
t ac
tiviti
es e
ligib
le fo
r SD
F su
ppor
t in
clud
e: M
arke
t res
earc
h; T
estin
g pi
lot s
cale
ope
ratio
ns; T
rain
ing;
Bu
sine
ss p
lann
ing
assi
stan
ce;
Dev
elop
men
t of e
nd-u
ser f
inan
cing
m
echa
nism
s.
To d
ate,
it h
as id
entif
ied
appr
oxim
atel
y 20
0 of
its
likel
y 40
0 po
tent
ial ‘
pipe
line’
com
pani
es. O
f th
ese,
SD
F w
ill pr
ovid
e Bu
sine
ss
Dev
elop
men
t Ser
vice
s (B
DS)
fund
ing
for 6
0-75
, man
y of
whi
ch a
re
expe
cted
to g
radu
ate
to o
btai
n in
vest
men
t cap
ital.
As o
f Jan
uary
20
01, i
t has
com
mitt
ed $
411,
000
to
busi
ness
dev
elop
men
t act
iviti
es fo
r 15
firm
s.
SDG
is in
yea
r tw
o of
wha
t can
be
cons
ider
ed a
five
-yea
r pilo
t pha
se. I
f su
cces
sful
, SD
G w
ill be
sel
f-su
ppor
ting
at th
e en
d of
the
pilo
t ph
ase
and,
with
a p
rove
n tra
ck
reco
rd, h
ave
acce
ss to
the
capi
tal
mar
kets
. All
inve
stor
s w
ill ha
ve a
de
fined
exi
t opt
ion
a fiv
e to
sev
en
year
sta
ged
clos
edow
n, s
ale,
or
trans
fer o
f ow
ners
hip
of th
e in
vest
men
t por
tfolio
Fr
om th
e Ba
nk’s
poi
nt o
f vie
w, i
t is
prop
osed
that
gra
nts
be m
ade
to
cove
r the
pilo
t pha
se o
nly,
thus
de
finin
g a
clea
r end
-poi
nt fo
r co
mm
itmen
t to
fund
ing.
Pha
sing
out
of
the
Bank
’s in
volv
emen
t has
bee
n bu
ilt in
to b
oth
the
finan
cing
and
m
anag
emen
t pla
ns. M
anag
emen
t di
seng
agem
ent h
as a
lread
y ta
ken
plac
e up
on th
e se
lect
ion
of P
V Pa
rtner
s as
man
ager
in M
arch
199
9 w
hile
fina
ncia
l dis
enga
gem
ent w
ill
be c
ompl
eted
at t
he e
nd o
f FY0
4.
PS
I NET
WO
RK
– N
ON
-DG
F
64
Col
labo
rativ
e G
roup
on
Artis
anal
and
Sm
all
Scal
e M
inin
g
The
Mis
sion
of t
he C
olla
bora
tive
Gro
up o
n Ar
tisan
al a
nd S
mal
l-Sca
le
Min
ing
(CAS
M) i
s to
redu
ce p
over
ty
by s
uppo
rting
inte
grat
ed s
usta
inab
le
deve
lopm
ent o
f com
mun
ities
af
fect
ed b
y or
invo
lved
in a
rtisa
nal
and
smal
l-sca
le m
inin
g in
de
velo
ping
cou
ntrie
s.
Co-
ordi
nate
and
net
wor
k be
twee
n st
akeh
olde
rs; E
xcha
nge
info
rmat
ion
on e
mer
ging
exp
erie
nce
and
faci
litat
e co
ordi
natio
n be
twee
n bi
late
ral a
nd m
ultil
ater
al p
rogr
ams;
Ac
t as
a m
echa
nism
to fa
cilit
ate
mat
chin
g pr
ojec
ts a
nd p
ropo
sals
w
ith fu
ndin
g so
urce
s.
Inve
ntor
y of
exi
stin
g sm
all s
cale
m
inin
g pr
ojec
ts; a
con
tact
dat
a ba
se
that
will
cons
ist o
f a n
etw
ork
of c
on-
tact
s in
the
smal
l sca
le a
nd a
rtisa
nal
min
ing
sect
or; a
nd s
elec
ting
a va
riety
of
pro
ject
s fo
r CAS
M th
at w
ill re
flect
bo
th re
gion
al d
iver
sity
and
the
diffe
rent
dim
ensi
ons
of s
mal
l sca
le
min
ing
that
war
rant
s ad
dres
s.
Annex H 54
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
65
D
igita
l Opp
ortu
nity
Ta
sk F
orce
Th
e ai
m o
f DO
T Fo
rce
was
to
inte
grat
e ef
forts
to b
ridge
the
digi
tal
divi
de in
to a
bro
ader
inte
rnat
iona
l ap
proa
ch. H
ereu
nder
: To
enha
nce
glob
al u
nder
stan
ding
and
co
nsen
sus
on th
e ch
alle
nges
and
op
portu
nitie
s po
sed
by in
form
atio
n an
d co
mm
unic
atio
n te
chno
logi
es;
To fo
ster
gre
ater
coh
eren
ce a
mon
g th
e va
rious
initi
ativ
es; T
o en
hanc
e th
e ef
fect
ive
mob
ilizat
ion
of
reso
urce
s to
add
ress
thes
e ch
alle
nges
and
opp
ortu
nitie
s.
The
DO
T Fo
rce
wro
te a
repo
rt,
incl
udin
g an
act
ion
plan
, to
help
br
idge
the
digi
tal d
ivid
e. T
he re
port
was
bas
ed u
pon
a co
nsul
tativ
e pr
oces
s in
volv
ing
plen
ary
mee
tings
, in
form
al c
onsu
ltatio
ns, m
eetin
gs
with
sta
keho
lder
s, a
nd e
lect
roni
c ou
treac
h to
bro
ader
aud
ienc
es
acro
ss th
e w
orld
.
Stra
tegi
c pl
an fo
r the
Inte
rnat
iona
l e-
Dev
elop
men
t Res
ourc
e N
etw
ork;
Bu
ild a
virt
ual n
etw
ork
to p
rovi
de
advi
ce a
nd e
xper
tise
and
favo
r kn
owle
dge
shar
ing;
Dev
elop
ac
cess
ible
web
-bas
ed to
ols;
M
easu
re a
nd p
rom
ote
gove
rnm
ent e
-re
adin
ess.
66
Ener
gy S
ecto
r M
anag
emen
t As
sist
ance
Pro
gram
ESM
AP’s
mis
sion
is to
add
ress
the
role
of e
nerg
y in
the
deve
lopm
ent
proc
ess
with
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f co
ntrib
utin
g to
pov
erty
alle
viat
ion;
im
prov
ing
livin
g co
nditi
ons
and
pres
ervi
ng th
e en
viro
nmen
t in
deve
lopi
ng c
ount
ries
and
trans
ition
ec
onom
ies.
ESM
AP p
rovi
des
free
polic
y ad
vice
an
d ot
her t
echn
ical
ass
ista
nce
to
gove
rnm
ents
. Cou
ntry
-leve
l ac
tiviti
es in
clud
e: S
peci
fic s
tudi
es
such
as
coun
try e
nerg
y as
sess
men
ts a
nd ta
rget
ed te
chni
cal
stud
ies;
Stra
tegi
c ad
vice
and
oth
er
advi
sory
ser
vice
s; P
ilot p
roje
cts
and
pre-
inve
stm
ent w
ork.
ESM
AP is
al
so e
ngag
ed in
kno
wle
dge
gene
ratio
n an
d di
ssem
inat
ion
of
best
pra
ctic
es. C
entra
l pr
ogra
mm
atic
act
iviti
es in
clud
e:
Web
-site
; Tra
inin
g, w
orks
hops
, and
se
min
ars;
Con
fere
nces
and
ro
undt
able
s; P
ublic
atio
ns.
Free
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce;
spe
cific
st
udie
s; a
dvis
ory
serv
ices
; pilo
t pr
ojec
ts; k
now
ledg
e ge
nera
tion
and
diss
emin
atio
n; tr
aini
ngs,
wor
ksho
ps
and
sem
inar
s; c
onfe
renc
es a
nd
roun
dtab
les;
pub
licat
ions
.
67
Fore
ign
Inve
stm
ent
Advi
sory
Ser
vice
To
hel
p go
vern
men
ts in
dev
elop
ing
and
trans
ition
cou
ntrie
s to
des
ign
initi
ativ
es to
attr
act f
orei
gn d
irect
in
vest
men
t.
FIAS
pro
vide
s co
nfid
entia
l adv
isor
y se
rvic
es to
gov
ernm
ents
, at t
he
requ
est o
f gov
ernm
ents
, and
on
topi
cs id
entif
ied
by th
e go
vern
men
t an
d ag
reed
to b
y bo
th p
artie
s.
Thro
ugh
inte
ract
ive
wor
ksho
ps a
nd
roun
dtab
le m
eetin
gs F
IAS
also
he
lps
gove
rnm
ents
cha
rt te
chni
cally
an
d po
litic
ally
pra
ctic
al p
aths
to
chan
ge.
68
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
Prog
ram
Th
e W
SP m
issi
on is
to a
llevi
ate
pove
rty b
y he
lpin
g th
e po
or in
de
velo
ping
cou
ntrie
s ga
in s
usta
ined
ac
cess
to im
prov
ed w
ater
and
sa
nita
tion
serv
ices
.
Polic
y su
ppor
t; Su
ppor
t to
inve
stm
ent p
roje
cts;
Pilo
t and
de
mon
stra
tion
proj
ects
; Sec
tor
netw
orki
ng; a
nd K
now
ledg
e sh
arin
g (le
arni
ng e
vent
s, c
ase
stud
ies,
and
fie
ld n
otes
).
WSP
pro
duct
s: p
olic
y su
ppor
t, su
ppor
t to
inve
stm
ent p
roje
cts,
pilo
t an
d de
mon
stra
tion
proj
ects
, sec
tor
netw
orki
ng, a
nd k
now
ledg
e sh
arin
g (le
arni
ng e
vent
s, c
ase
stud
ies,
and
fie
ld n
otes
).
55 Annex H
Pr
ogra
m
Prog
ram
obj
ectiv
es
Prog
ram
act
iviti
es
Out
puts
and
out
com
es
Exit
stra
tegy
WO
RLD
BA
NK
INST
ITU
TE –
NO
N-D
GF
69
The
Glo
bal K
now
ledg
e Pa
rtner
ship
Th
e G
KP is
com
mitt
ed to
sha
ring
info
rmat
ion,
exp
erie
nces
and
re
sour
ces
to p
rom
ote
know
ledg
e an
d in
form
atio
n as
tool
s of
su
stai
nabl
e, e
quita
ble
deve
lopm
ent
thro
ugh
info
rmat
ion
and
com
mun
icat
ion
tech
nolo
gies
(IC
T).
Dev
elop
sta
ndar
ds a
nd g
uide
lines
for
usin
g ne
w te
chno
logi
es fo
r con
tent
m
anag
emen
t; in
crea
se th
e vo
lum
e an
d ac
cess
ibilit
y of
con
tent
, in
form
atio
n an
d kn
owle
dge
flow
s;
impr
ove
know
ledg
e-ba
sed
educ
atio
n sy
stem
s th
roug
h ef
fect
ive
and
appr
opria
te in
tegr
atio
n of
ICTs
; su
ppor
t wom
en e
ntre
pren
eurs
, in
the
use
of IC
Ts fo
r all
appr
opria
te
busi
ness
es, a
nd in
eng
agin
g in
ICT-
rela
ted
busi
ness
es; p
rom
ote
the
colle
ctio
n, p
rodu
ctio
n an
d di
ssem
inat
ion
of lo
cal k
now
ledg
e.
Valu
e-ad
ded
serv
ices
suc
h as
onl
ine
tool
s fo
r net
wor
king
and
kno
wle
dge-
shar
ing;
Upd
ates
on
loca
l, re
gion
al
and
glob
al “k
now
ledg
e fo
r de
velo
pmen
t” in
itiat
ives
; O
ppor
tuni
ties
for d
irect
and
indi
rect
ad
voca
cy in
glo
bal p
olic
y di
alog
ues
rega
rdin
g “k
now
ledg
e fo
r de
velo
pmen
t” is
sues
; and
O
ppor
tuni
ties
to n
etw
ork
and
shar
e kn
owle
dge
on a
regi
onal
and
glo
bal
basi
s w
ith li
ke-m
inde
d or
gani
zatio
ns.
70
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent
Lear
ning
Net
wor
k To
har
ness
mod
ern
tech
nolo
gy –
in
clud
ing
inte
ract
ive
vide
o, th
e In
tern
et, a
nd s
atel
lite
com
mun
icat
ions
– in
a c
ost-e
ffect
ive
way
, so
that
peo
ple
who
kno
w a
re
brou
ght t
oget
her w
ith th
ose
who
ne
ed to
kno
w, t
o le
arn
with
and
from
ea
ch o
ther
abo
ut th
e fu
ll ra
nge
of
deve
lopm
ent i
ssue
s.
Prov
ide
cost
-effe
ctiv
e in
tera
ctiv
e le
arni
ng a
ctiv
ities
thro
ugho
ut th
e de
velo
ping
wor
ld; i
nter
activ
e le
arni
ng; F
acilit
ate
regu
lar
exch
ange
s am
ong
prac
titio
ners
and
ex
perts
acr
oss
coun
tries
and
re
gion
s; P
rovi
de th
e m
eans
to
exch
ange
cut
ting-
edge
kno
wle
dge
with
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t com
mun
ity.
182
prog
ram
s in
volv
ing
15,8
00
parti
cipa
nts;
GD
LN b
eam
ed a
n av
erag
e of
five
to te
n le
arni
ng
prog
ram
s ac
ross
the
glob
e ea
ch d
ay;
DLC
s ea
rned
reve
nues
rang
ing
from
25
per
cent
to 8
0 pe
rcen
t of t
heir
first
ye
ar’s
ope
ratin
g ex
pens
es.
Annex H 56
Ann
ex I.
Cla
ssifi
catio
n of
Glo
bal P
rogr
ams
By
Exte
nt o
f Spi
llove
rs
By
Leve
l and
Typ
e of
Act
iviti
es
Prog
ram
DG
FSt
atus
M
anag
ed
In-H
ouse
G
loba
l pu
blic
go
ods
NPG
s w
ith
pote
ntia
l re
gion
al
spill
over
s
NPG
s w
ithou
t sp
illov
ers
Mer
it g
oods
G
loba
l ne
twor
king
C
ount
ry-
leve
l te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce
Glo
bal a
nd
coun
try-
leve
l in
vest
men
ts
ESSD
Net
wor
k
Envi
ronm
ent
1 C
ritic
al E
cosy
stem
Par
tner
ship
Fu
nd
Win
dow
1B
No
X
X
XX
Fo
rest
Par
tner
ship
s Pr
ogra
m
Win
dow
2
2 Fo
rest
Allia
nce
for C
onse
r- va
tion
and
Sust
aina
ble
Use
W
indo
w 2
Ye
s (J
oint
with
W
WF)
X
X
X
3 Fo
rest
Tre
nds
Win
dow
2
No
X
X
4 Pr
ogra
m o
n Fo
rest
s
(PR
OFO
R II
) W
indo
w 2
Ye
s
X
X
X
5 Th
e G
loba
l Mec
hani
sm to
C
omba
t Des
ertif
icat
ion
Win
dow
2
No
X
X
XX
6 M
illenn
ium
Eco
syst
em
Asse
ssm
ent
Exite
d FY
01
No
X
X
7 C
olla
bora
tive
Partn
ersh
ip o
n Fo
rest
s no
n-D
GF
No
X X
8 In
tern
atio
nal C
oral
Ree
f In
itiat
ive
non-
DG
F
No
XX
X
9 M
ultil
ater
al F
und
for t
he
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Mon
treal
Pr
otoc
ol
non-
DG
F
No
X X
X
10
Glo
bal E
nviro
nmen
t Fac
ility
non-
DG
F N
o X
XX
X11
Pr
otot
ype
Car
bon
Fund
no
n-D
GF
Yes
X
X
XX
57 Annex I
By
Exte
nt o
f Spi
llove
rs
By
Leve
l and
Typ
e of
Act
iviti
es
Prog
ram
DG
FSt
atus
M
anag
ed
In-H
ouse
G
loba
l pu
blic
go
ods
NPG
s w
ith
pote
ntia
l re
gion
al
spill
over
s
NPG
s w
ithou
t sp
illov
ers
Mer
it g
oods
G
loba
l ne
twor
king
C
ount
ry-
leve
l te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce
Glo
bal a
nd
coun
try-
leve
l in
vest
men
ts
Rur
al D
evel
opm
ent
12
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up o
n In
tern
atio
nal A
gric
ultu
ral
Res
earc
h W
indo
w 1
A Ye
s X
XX
X
13
Glo
bal W
ater
Par
tner
ship
Ex
iting
FY0
2 N
o
X
X
14
The
Wor
ld C
omm
issi
on o
n D
ams
Exite
d FY
01
No
X
X
15
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g fo
r Tra
de
Polic
y, S
trate
gy D
evel
opm
ent
and
WTO
Neg
otia
tions
no
n-D
GF
Ye
sX
X
16
Com
mod
ity P
rice
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t Pro
ject
no
n-D
GF
Ye
sX
X
X
17
Feed
ing
Min
ds, F
ight
ing
Hun
ger
non-
DG
F N
o
X
X
18
Glo
bal I
nteg
rate
d Pe
st
Man
agem
ent F
acilit
y
non-
DG
F
N
oX
XX
19
The
Popu
lar C
oalit
ion
to
Erad
icat
e H
unge
r and
Pov
erty
no
n-D
GF
No
X
XX
Soci
al D
evel
opm
ent
20
Smal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
W
indo
w 1
B Ye
s
X
X
21
Post
-Con
flict
Fun
d W
indo
w 1
B Ye
s
X
XX
22
Inte
rnat
iona
l For
um o
n C
apac
ity
Build
ing
non-
DG
F
N
oX
X
23
PRSP
Act
ion
Lear
ning
Pro
gram
no
n-D
GF
Yes
X
X
Annex I 58
By
Exte
nt o
f Spi
llove
rs
By
Leve
l and
Typ
e of
Act
iviti
es
Prog
ram
DG
FSt
atus
M
anag
ed
In-H
ouse
G
loba
l pu
blic
go
ods
NPG
s w
ith
pote
ntia
l re
gion
al
spill
over
s
NPG
s w
ithou
t sp
illov
ers
Mer
it g
oods
G
loba
l ne
twor
king
C
ount
ry-
leve
l te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce
Glo
bal a
nd
coun
try-
leve
l in
vest
men
ts
FSE
24
Faci
lity
for F
inan
cial
Sec
tor
Stre
ngth
enin
g W
indo
w 2
Ye
s
X
X
X
25
The
Toro
nto
Inte
rnat
iona
l Le
ader
ship
Cen
tre fo
r Fin
anci
al
Sect
or S
uper
visi
on
Exite
d FY
00
No
X
26
Fina
ncia
l Sec
tor A
sses
smen
t Pr
ogra
m
non-
DG
F Ye
s (J
oint
with
IM
F)
X
XX
27
Fina
ncia
l Sta
bilit
y Fo
rum
no
n-D
GF
No
X
X
HD
N N
etw
ork
Educ
atio
n
G
loba
l Dev
elop
men
t Net
wor
k -
Educ
atio
n R
esea
rch
Com
pone
nt
Win
dow
2
No
28
The
Partn
ersh
ip fo
r Chi
ld
Dev
elop
men
t W
indo
w 2
N
o
X
XX
Pr
ogra
m fo
r Edu
catio
n St
atis
tics
Win
dow
2
No
29
UN
ESC
O In
stitu
te fo
r Sta
tistic
s W
indo
w 2
N
o
X
XX
30
OEC
D W
orld
Edu
catio
n In
dica
tors
Pro
gram
W
indo
w 2
N
o
X
XX
Pr
ogra
m fo
r the
Ass
essm
ent o
f St
uden
t Ach
ieve
men
t W
indo
w2
N
o
31
Tren
ds in
Mat
hem
atic
s an
d Sc
ienc
e Ac
hiev
emen
t Aro
und
the
Wor
ld
Win
dow
2
No
XX
X
32
Prog
ress
in In
tern
atio
nal
Rea
ding
Lite
racy
Stu
dy
Win
dow
2
No
XX
X
59 Annex I
By
Exte
nt o
f Spi
llove
rs
By
Leve
l and
Typ
e of
Act
iviti
es
Prog
ram
DG
FSt
atus
M
anag
ed
In-H
ouse
G
loba
l pu
blic
go
ods
NPG
s w
ith
pote
ntia
l re
gion
al
spill
over
s
NPG
s w
ithou
t sp
illov
ers
Mer
it g
oods
G
loba
l ne
twor
king
C
ount
ry-
leve
l te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce
Glo
bal a
nd
coun
try-
leve
l in
vest
men
ts
33
Wor
ld L
inks
for D
evel
opm
ent
Win
dow
2
Yes
(Joi
nt w
ith
Wor
LD)
X
X X
X
34
Focu
sing
Res
ourc
es o
n Ef
fect
ive
Scho
ol H
ealth
no
n-D
GF
N
o
X
XX
H
ealth
, Nut
ritio
n &
Po
pula
tion
35
Cen
tre o
f Exc
elle
nce
for
Nut
ritio
n, In
tern
atio
nal C
ente
r fo
r Dia
rrhea
l Dis
ease
Res
earc
h,
Bang
lade
sh
Exite
d FY
01
No
X
X
XX
36
Glo
bal F
orum
for H
ealth
R
esea
rch
Win
dow
1B
No
X
X
X
C
hild
hood
Illn
ess
Win
dow
1B
No
37
Glo
bal A
llianc
e fo
r Vac
cine
s an
d Im
mun
izat
ion
Win
dow
1B
No
X
X
XX
IN
DEP
TH H
ealth
Sur
veilla
nce
and
Expe
rimen
tal N
etw
ork
Win
dow
1B
No
Th
e In
tern
atio
nal A
IDS
Vacc
ine
Initi
ativ
e W
indo
w1B
N
o
M
edic
ines
for M
alar
ia V
entu
re
Win
dow
1B
No
38
Glo
bal M
icro
nutri
ent I
nitia
tive
Exiti
ng F
Y02
No
X
X
X
X
39
Popu
latio
n an
d R
epro
duct
ive
Hea
lth C
apac
ity B
uild
ing
Prog
ram
(PR
H)
Win
dow
1B
Yes
X
X
X
X
40
Rol
l Bac
k M
alar
ia
Win
dow
2
No
X
X
XX
41
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e fo
r R
esea
rch
and
Trai
ning
in
Trop
ical
Dis
ease
s (T
DR
) W
indo
w 1
A N
o X
XX
X
Annex I 60
By
Exte
nt o
f Spi
llove
rs
By
Leve
l and
Typ
e of
Act
iviti
es
Prog
ram
DG
FSt
atus
M
anag
ed
In-H
ouse
G
loba
l pu
blic
go
ods
NPG
s w
ith
pote
ntia
l re
gion
al
spill
over
s
NPG
s w
ithou
t sp
illov
ers
Mer
it g
oods
G
loba
l ne
twor
king
C
ount
ry-
leve
l te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce
Glo
bal a
nd
coun
try-
leve
l in
vest
men
ts
42
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e of
R
esea
rch,
Dev
elop
men
t &
Res
earc
h Tr
aini
ng in
Hum
an
Rep
rodu
ctio
n (H
RP)
Win
dow
1A
No
X
XX
X
43
Stop
TB
Win
dow
2
No
X
X
XX
44
UN
Adm
inis
trativ
e an
d C
oord
inat
ing
Com
mitt
ee, S
ub-
Com
mitt
ee o
n N
utrit
ion
Exite
d FY
99
No
X
X
45
UN
AID
S (J
oint
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
Pr
ogra
mm
e on
HIV
/AID
S)
Win
dow
1B
No
X
XX
46
Com
mis
sion
on
Mac
roec
onom
ics
and
Hea
lth
non-
DG
F
N
oX
X
47
Lym
phat
ic F
iliaria
sis
non-
DG
F Ye
s
X
XX
X
Soci
al P
rote
ctio
n
48
Soci
al P
rote
ctio
n fo
r the
In
form
al E
cono
my
non-
DG
F
Ye
sX
X
49
Und
erst
andi
ng C
hild
ren'
s W
ork
non-
DG
F N
o
X
X
ISG
50
Dev
elop
men
t Gat
eway
Fo
unda
tion
Win
dow
2
Yes
X
X
XX
PREM
Net
wor
k
51
Forg
ing
Partn
ersh
ips
for G
ood
Gov
erna
nce
in P
ublic
Ex
pend
iture
and
Rec
ords
M
anag
emen
t
Win
dow
2
Yes
X
X
X
52
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent N
etw
ork
Win
dow
1B
No
X
X
X
61 Annex I
By
Exte
nt o
f Spi
llove
rs
By
Leve
l and
Typ
e of
Act
iviti
es
Prog
ram
DG
FSt
atus
M
anag
ed
In-H
ouse
G
loba
l pu
blic
go
ods
NPG
s w
ith
pote
ntia
l re
gion
al
spill
over
s
NPG
s w
ithou
t sp
illov
ers
Mer
it g
oods
G
loba
l ne
twor
king
C
ount
ry-
leve
l te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce
Glo
bal a
nd
coun
try-
leve
l in
vest
men
ts
53
Inte
grat
ed F
ram
ewor
k fo
r Tra
de
Win
dow
2
No
XX
53
Partn
ersh
ips
in S
tatis
tics
for t
he
21st
Cen
tury
(PAR
IS-2
1)
Exiti
ng F
Y02
No
XX
55
DAC
Net
wor
k on
Goo
d G
over
nanc
e an
d C
apac
ity
Dev
elop
men
t (G
OVN
ET)
No
X
X
PREM
Net
wor
k
56
Busi
ness
Par
tner
s fo
r D
evel
opm
ent (
BPD
) Ex
iting
FY0
2 N
o
X
X
BP
D -
Know
ledg
e R
esou
rce
Gro
up
No
BP
D -
Glo
bal P
artn
ersh
ip fo
r Yo
uth
Dev
elop
men
t Ex
ited
FY01
No
BP
D -
Nat
ural
Res
ourc
es
Clu
ster
Ex
ited
FY01
No
BP
D -
Glo
bal R
oad
Safe
ty
Partn
ersh
ip
No
BP
D -
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
Clu
ster
Ex
ited
FY01
No
57
Citi
es A
llianc
e W
indo
w 2
Ye
s
X
XX
58
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up to
Ass
ist
the
Poor
est
Yes
X
XX
59
Glo
bal C
orpo
rate
Gov
erna
nce
Foru
m
Win
dow
2
Yes
X
60
The
Info
rmat
ion
for
Dev
elop
men
t Pro
gram
(in
foD
ev)
Win
dow
1B
Yes
X
X
X
61
Prov
entio
n C
onso
rtium
Ye
s
X
X
62
Publ
ic-P
rivat
e In
frast
ruct
ure
Advi
sory
Fac
ility
Win
dow
2
Yes
X
X
63
Sola
r Dev
elop
men
t Gro
up
Win
dow
2
No
X
XX
X
X
no
n-D
GF
Exite
dFY
01
Exiti
ngFY
02
Win
dow
1A
X
Win
dow
2
X
Annex I 62
By
Exte
nt o
f Spi
llove
rs
By
Leve
l and
Typ
e of
Act
iviti
es
Prog
ram
DG
FSt
atus
M
anag
ed
In-H
ouse
G
loba
l pu
blic
go
ods
NPG
s w
ith
pote
ntia
l re
gion
al
spill
over
s
NPG
s w
ithou
t sp
illov
ers
Mer
it g
oods
G
loba
l ne
twor
king
C
ount
ry-
leve
l te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce
Glo
bal a
nd
coun
try-
leve
l in
vest
men
ts
64
Col
labo
rativ
e G
roup
on
Artis
anal
and
Sm
all S
cale
M
inin
g Ye
sX
X
65
Dig
ital O
ppor
tuni
ty T
ask
(DO
T)
Forc
e no
n-D
GF
Yes
(Joi
nt w
ith
UN
DP)
X
66
Ener
gy S
ecto
r Man
agem
ent
Assi
stan
ce P
rogr
amm
e no
n-D
GF
Ye
sX
XX
67
Fore
ign
Inve
stm
ent A
dvis
ory
Serv
ice
Yes
X
X
68
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
Prog
ram
no
n-D
GF
Yes
XX
W
BI (
Wor
ld B
ank
Inst
itute
)
69
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent L
earn
ing
Net
wor
k Ye
sX
X
X
70
The
Glo
bal K
now
ledg
e Pa
rtner
ship
no
n-D
GF
N
oX
To
tal
13
207
6546
20
non-
DG
F
X
no
n-D
GF
X
63 Annex I
non-
DG
F
X
30
Ann
ex J
. Ben
efic
iari
es a
nd B
enef
its o
f Glo
bal P
rogr
ams
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Crit
ical
Eco
syst
ems
Partn
ersh
ip F
und
Allia
nce
for F
ores
t Con
serv
atio
n an
d Su
stai
nabl
e U
se (W
WF)
U
ltim
atel
y, s
ubst
antia
l pro
gres
s in
fore
st a
nd b
iodi
vers
ity c
onse
rvat
ion
thro
ugh
the
achi
evem
ent o
f the
con
serv
atio
n ta
rget
s. A
noth
er b
enef
it de
rive
from
the
fact
that
the
Allia
nce
is w
orki
ng to
war
ds th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f bui
ldin
g bl
ocs
for
wid
er s
usta
inab
le fo
rest
man
agem
ent.
The
partn
ersh
ipha
s al
so a
dire
ct b
enef
it fo
r WW
F th
roug
h th
e sm
all g
rant
pro
gram
and
an
acce
ss to
pol
icy
dial
ogue
w
ithin
the
Bank
.
Fore
st T
rend
s
Prog
ram
on
Fore
sts
(PR
OFO
R II
)
Glo
bal M
echa
nism
to C
omba
t D
eser
tific
atio
n 1)
Nat
iona
l gov
ernm
ents
, reg
iona
l/sub
-regi
onal
bod
ies
invo
lved
in th
e pr
epar
atio
n of
nat
iona
l, re
gion
al/s
ub-re
gion
al
actio
n pr
ogra
ms
to c
omba
t des
ertif
icat
ion;
2) l
ocal
co
mm
uniti
es; 3
) loc
al/n
atio
nal N
GO
s.
Enha
nced
cap
aciti
es, k
now
ledg
e an
d to
ols
for b
ette
r lan
d m
anag
emen
t, se
ed/c
atal
ytic
reso
urce
s fo
r dev
elop
ing
inve
stm
ent p
acka
ges
aim
ed a
t im
plem
entin
g th
e C
CD
.
Mille
nniu
m E
cosy
stem
Ass
essm
ent
Col
labo
rativ
e Pa
rtner
ship
on
Fore
sts
Th
e in
term
edia
te b
enef
icia
ries
(the
Nat
iona
l Gov
ernm
ents
) rec
eive
pol
icy
advi
ce. T
he u
ltim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
bene
fit fr
om im
prov
ed p
olic
ies.
Glo
bal E
nviro
nmen
t Fac
ility
The
inte
rmed
iate
ben
efic
iarie
s ar
e th
e Ba
nk’s
clie
nt
coun
tries
- pa
rticu
larly
thei
r sec
tors
that
dep
end
heav
ily o
n na
tura
l res
ourc
es a
nd th
e in
tegr
ity o
f eco
syst
ems,
as
wel
l as
thos
e re
spon
sibl
e fo
r ene
rgy,
tran
spor
t, an
d ur
ban
deve
lopm
ent.
The
ultim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
are
the
inte
rnat
iona
l co
mm
unity
, giv
en th
e gl
obal
env
ironm
enta
l obj
ectiv
es o
f the
G
EF.
The
prin
cipa
l ben
efits
that
ben
efic
iarie
s re
ceiv
e fro
m th
e G
EF is
gra
nt fi
nanc
ing
that
com
plem
ents
a fi
nanc
ing
pack
age
that
con
sist
s of
loan
s/cr
edits
and
oth
er
reso
urce
s. G
EF is
als
o th
e fin
anci
al m
echa
nism
for t
hree
inte
rnat
iona
l co
nven
tions
(on
biod
iver
sity
, clim
ate
chan
ge, a
nd p
ersi
sten
t org
anic
pol
luta
nts)
an
d th
e fin
anci
ng it
pro
vide
s he
lps
reci
pien
t cou
ntrie
s to
fulfi
ll th
eir
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
unde
r the
se c
onve
ntio
ns. T
he G
EF re
sour
ces
enab
le th
e Ba
nk
to p
rovi
de a
mor
e co
mpl
ete
arra
y of
fina
ncin
g in
stru
men
ts to
our
clie
nts,
in
resp
onse
to th
e sp
ecifi
c na
ture
of i
nter
vent
ions
and
pro
ject
obj
ectiv
es. T
his
pack
age
of fi
nanc
ing
is c
ritic
al to
sup
porti
ng m
ains
tream
ing
in o
ur c
lient
s’
sect
oral
dev
elop
men
t pla
ns.
Nat
iona
l and
loca
l gov
ernm
ents
, cre
atin
g R
egio
nal-l
evel
st
rate
gies
that
are
com
plem
enta
ry to
the
Wor
ld B
ank’
s re
gion
al in
itiat
ives
.
Know
ledg
e Sh
arin
g, in
vest
men
t cat
alys
t, a
criti
cal m
ass
of in
form
atio
n sh
arin
g an
d re
sour
ces,
and
an
orga
nizi
ng fr
amew
ork
for m
ore
info
rmed
inve
stm
ent.
Mul
tilat
eral
Fun
d fo
r Im
plem
enta
tion
of
Mon
treal
Pro
toco
l
Prot
otyp
e C
arbo
n Fu
nd
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up o
f Int
erna
tiona
l Ag
ricul
tura
l Res
earc
h
Ulti
mat
ely
fore
st d
epen
dent
peo
ple
are
the
bene
ficia
ries
of
the
targ
et d
riven
pro
gram
of t
he A
llianc
e. H
owev
er B
ank
Task
Man
ager
s, W
WF
coun
try o
ffice
s an
d cl
ient
go
vern
men
ts a
lso
bene
fit th
roug
h th
e re
spec
tive
prog
ram
s an
d jo
intly
impl
emen
ted
proj
ects
. Int
erm
edia
te b
enef
icia
ries
wou
ld b
e lo
cal a
nd g
loba
l con
serv
atio
n st
akeh
olde
rs.
Inte
rnat
iona
l Cor
al R
eefs
Initi
ativ
e
Annex J 64
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Glo
bal W
ater
Par
tner
ship
T
he u
ltim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
are
the
poor
who
lack
acc
ess
to
wat
er a
nd w
ater
-rela
ted
serv
ices
. The
inte
rmed
iate
be
nefic
iarie
s ar
e th
e st
akeh
olde
rs w
ho, t
hrou
gh th
e G
WP,
ha
ve a
foru
m fo
r int
erac
tion.
Wor
ld C
omm
issi
on o
n D
ams
The
ulti
mat
e be
nefic
iarie
s ar
e th
e po
or. T
he in
term
edia
te
bene
ficia
ries
are
all t
he s
take
hold
ers
invo
lved
. Th
e pr
inci
pal b
enef
its re
ceiv
ed fr
om th
e (in
term
edia
te) b
enef
icia
ries
are
stak
ehol
der f
orum
and
the
luci
d re
port
on le
sson
s le
arne
d.
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g fo
r Tra
de P
olic
y,
Stra
tegy
Dev
elop
men
t and
WTO
N
egot
iatio
ns
The
ulti
mat
e in
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
of th
e pr
ogra
m a
re th
e in
divi
dual
s in
clie
nt c
ount
ries
that
dep
end
on a
gric
ultu
re fo
r th
eir l
ivel
ihoo
d. T
he in
dire
ct b
enef
icia
ries
are
the
trade
ne
gotia
tors
, pol
icy
offic
ials
, in
gove
rnm
ent a
nd in
tern
atio
nal
orga
niza
tions
that
influ
ence
the
polic
ies
and
inst
itutio
ns
whi
ch a
ffect
or d
eter
min
e th
e op
portu
nitie
s an
d be
nefit
s fro
m
trade
and
inte
grat
ion.
The
pro
gram
has
hel
ped
in e
nhan
cing
the
voic
e an
d ca
paci
ty o
f poo
r cou
ntrie
s to
par
ticip
ate
mor
e ef
fect
ivel
y in
glo
bal t
rade
neg
otia
tions
. With
mor
e tim
ely
and
solid
ana
lyse
s on
key
issu
es fa
cing
them
, the
y ha
ve b
een
able
to p
repa
re m
ore
effe
ctiv
ely
in a
dvan
ce th
an in
pre
viou
s ro
unds
. The
new
dev
elop
men
t foc
us o
f th
e ne
w W
TO n
egot
iatio
ns, f
ollo
win
g th
e ne
w D
oha
Dev
elop
men
t Age
nda.
Com
mod
ity P
rice
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t Pr
ojec
t Th
e pr
ime
bene
ficia
ries
are
smal
l-sca
le p
rodu
cers
of e
xpor
t co
mm
oditi
es a
nd th
e pr
ovid
ers
of ri
sk m
anag
emen
t in
stru
men
ts -
loca
l ban
ks, c
redi
t ins
titut
ions
and
co
oper
ativ
es. I
n ad
ditio
n be
nefic
iarie
s w
ill be
mad
e up
of
poor
farm
ers
who
pro
duce
exp
ort c
omm
oditi
es a
nd,
poss
ibly
, the
pop
ulat
ion
of p
oor c
ount
ries
at la
rge
thro
ugh
the
bene
fits
pric
e ris
k m
anag
emen
t cou
ld b
ring
to
gove
rnm
ents
hig
hly
depe
nden
t on
expo
rt ea
rnin
gs. M
ore
then
50
deve
lopi
ng c
ount
ries
depe
nd o
n th
ree
or fe
wer
co
mm
oditi
es fo
r mor
e th
an h
alf o
f the
ir ex
port
earn
ings
.
They
will
obta
in k
now
ledg
e th
roug
h te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e an
d ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
and
incr
ease
d ac
cess
to c
redi
t.
Feed
ing
Min
ds a
nd F
ight
ing
Hun
ger
Dire
ct b
enef
icia
ries
are
scho
olte
ache
rs w
ho re
ceiv
e cu
rricu
lum
mat
eria
ls, s
choo
lchi
ldre
n w
ho re
ceiv
e th
e ed
ucat
ion
and
ultim
atel
y th
e fo
od in
secu
re w
ho w
ill be
nefit
in
the
next
gen
erat
ion
from
lead
ers
mor
e co
mm
itted
to th
e is
sues
in th
e fu
ture
See
to th
e le
ft.
Smal
l res
ourc
e-po
or fa
rmer
s (g
ende
r als
o ex
plic
itly
men
tione
d). E
xten
sion
sys
tem
s, p
estic
ide
polic
y ex
perts
. Sm
all g
roup
s of
farm
ers
atte
nd fa
rmer
fiel
d sc
hool
s an
d le
arn
the
IPM
m
etho
dolo
gy, d
evel
op s
ocia
l coh
esio
n; b
ut, v
ery
smal
l num
bers
par
ticip
ate.
Th
ere
is s
ome
polic
y ad
vice
for s
ubsi
dy p
olic
ies
to g
over
nmen
ts.
Popu
lar C
oalit
ion
for t
he E
radi
catio
n of
H
unge
r and
Pov
erty
Th
e im
med
iate
ben
efic
iarie
s ar
e th
e m
embe
rs o
f the
C
oalit
ion,
the
NG
Os
and
CSO
s, a
nd th
e cl
ient
gov
ernm
ents
of
thei
r cou
ntrie
s. In
dire
ctly
the
Bank
and
the
larg
er d
onor
co
mm
unity
ben
efit.
The
prin
cipa
l ben
efit
that
the
CSO
/NG
O m
embe
rs re
ceiv
e is
the
oppo
rtuni
ty to
or
gani
ze, a
naly
ze, r
epor
t and
acc
ess
thei
r ow
n ex
perie
nce,
as
wel
l as
the
incr
ease
cre
dibi
lity
that
com
es fr
om d
oing
this
effe
ctiv
ely.
Clie
nt g
over
nmen
ts
get a
cces
s to
that
exp
erie
nce.
The
Ban
k an
d ot
her d
onor
s pr
ofit
from
acc
ess
to
that
exp
erie
nce,
and
the
Bank
ben
efits
for t
he o
ppor
tuni
ty to
use
the
foru
m fo
r di
scus
sion
with
the
NG
O/C
SO c
omm
unity
of i
ssue
s of
mut
ual c
once
rn.
Smal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
Su
bgra
nts
to c
arry
out
thei
r act
iviti
es. U
nint
ende
d w
ill be
the
asso
ciat
ion
with
th
e W
orld
Ban
k w
hich
cou
ld c
atal
yze
mor
e fu
ndin
g. O
ther
ben
efic
iarie
s ar
e th
e C
ount
ry O
ffice
s w
ho a
dmin
iste
r the
gra
nts
prog
ram
and
as
a re
sult,
hav
e im
prov
ed th
eir r
elat
ions
or p
artn
ersh
ips
with
civ
il so
ciet
y in
thei
r cou
ntrie
s.
The
prin
cipa
l ben
efits
rece
ived
from
the
(inte
rmed
iate
) ben
efic
iarie
s ar
e th
e fa
cilit
atin
g an
d ne
twor
king
func
tions
of t
he p
rogr
am, p
artic
ular
ly a
s it
prov
ides
a
neut
ral s
pace
for s
take
hold
er in
tera
ctio
n.
Glo
bal I
nteg
rate
d Pe
st M
anag
emen
t Fa
cilit
y
The
ultim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
are
mar
gina
lized
and
vul
nera
ble
grou
ps. T
he in
term
edia
te b
enef
icia
ries
are
the
NG
Os
and
civi
l soc
iety
gro
ups
who
rece
ive
gran
ts to
car
ry o
ut th
eir
activ
ities
.
65 Annex J
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Post
-Con
flict
Fun
d C
onfli
ct a
ffect
ed c
omm
uniti
es, a
nd th
eir g
over
nmen
ts a
nd
inst
itutio
ns.
Reb
uild
ing
of p
eopl
es li
ves
and
livel
ihoo
ds th
roug
h cr
itica
l act
iviti
es s
uch
as
dem
obiliz
atio
n, re
mov
al o
f lan
dmin
es, j
obs
for I
DPs
and
refu
gees
, ess
entia
l in
frast
ruct
ure
reha
bilit
atio
n, c
omm
unity
dev
elop
men
t act
iviti
es, r
econ
cilia
tion
activ
ities
, etc
.
Inte
rnat
iona
l For
um o
n C
apac
ity B
uild
ing
The
inte
nded
dire
ct b
enef
icia
ries
are
NG
Os
and
othe
r civ
il so
ciet
y gr
oups
, who
are
see
n as
inte
rmed
iarie
s of
de
velo
pmen
t act
ions
. Any
impr
ovem
ent i
n th
eir c
apac
ity is
bo
und
to b
enef
it th
e po
pula
tions
that
they
ser
ve, s
peci
fical
ly
the
poor
and
the
vuln
erab
le.
• Le
adin
g, in
man
y ca
ses,
to a
sea
t at t
he ta
ble
in n
atio
nal a
nd in
tern
atio
nal
fora
on
appr
oach
es to
dev
elop
men
t pol
icy
and
proj
ect i
mpl
emen
tatio
n.
• En
hanc
ed q
ualit
y of
cap
acity
bui
ldin
g fo
r NG
Os
thro
ugh
dire
ct a
ctiv
ities
an
d th
roug
h in
crea
sed
acco
unta
bilit
y of
oth
er s
take
hold
er g
roup
s su
ch a
s ‘p
rovi
ders
’ of c
apac
ity b
uild
ing.
PR
SP A
ctio
n Le
arni
ng P
rogr
am
The
inte
nded
dire
ct b
enef
icia
ries
of th
e pr
ogra
m a
re th
e co
untry
team
s (g
over
nmen
t and
civ
il so
ciet
y) in
volv
ed in
fo
rmul
atio
n an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of P
over
ty R
educ
tion
stra
tegi
es. T
he o
utpu
ts o
f the
Act
ion
lear
ning
pro
gram
hav
e be
en s
hare
d an
d di
ssem
inat
ed to
abo
ut 2
0 co
untri
es
invo
lved
in P
RSP
at a
num
ber o
f lea
rnin
g ev
ents
. The
oth
er
set o
f ben
efic
iarie
s ar
e th
e st
aff o
f the
Ban
k an
d Fu
nd w
ho
are
invo
lved
in fa
cilit
atin
g an
d su
ppor
ting
coun
try
gove
rnm
ents
invo
lved
in fo
rmul
atin
g PR
SPs.
Thi
s ha
s be
en
done
thro
ugh
coun
try te
am c
linic
s. T
he s
taff
of o
ther
bila
tera
l an
d m
ultil
ater
al a
genc
ies
invo
lved
in s
uppo
rting
PR
SP h
ave
also
ben
efite
d fro
m p
artic
ipat
ion
in v
ario
us le
arni
ng e
vent
s as
a re
sult
of th
e ac
tion
lear
ning
pro
gram
.
The
prin
cipa
l ben
efits
rela
te to
incr
ease
in c
ount
ry o
wne
rshi
p of
pov
erty
re
duct
ion
stra
tegi
es a
nd a
vaila
bilit
y of
a ra
nge
of c
hoic
es in
term
s of
ap
proa
ches
to p
artic
ipat
ion.
It h
as a
lso
enab
led
coun
try te
ams
(clie
nt a
nd
othe
rs) t
o lo
ok b
eyon
d co
nsul
tatio
n an
d de
velo
p ci
tizen
bas
ed a
ppro
ache
s to
ac
coun
tabi
lity
incl
udin
g ci
tizen
repo
rt ca
rds
and
parti
cipa
tory
mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion.
The
pro
gram
als
o en
able
s co
untri
es to
lear
n fro
m e
ach
othe
r and
th
e le
adin
g pr
actit
ione
rs o
f mac
ro le
vel p
artic
ipat
ion
thro
ugh
actio
n le
arni
ng
mec
hani
sms.
Thi
s w
ill im
prov
e th
e ch
ance
s of
effe
ctiv
e an
d su
stai
ned
impl
emen
tatio
n of
Pov
erty
redu
ctio
n st
rate
gies
at t
he c
ount
ry le
vel.
Faci
lity
for F
inan
cial
Sec
tor
Stre
ngth
enin
g T
he b
enef
its re
ceiv
ed in
clud
e: im
prov
ed c
oord
inat
ion
of d
onor
act
iviti
es (w
hich
w
ill pr
even
t dup
licat
ion
of e
fforts
), be
tter l
ever
agin
g of
reso
urce
s, in
crea
sed
reso
urce
s de
vote
d to
fina
ncia
l sec
tor s
treng
then
ing,
gre
ater
div
ersi
ty o
f te
chni
cal c
apac
ity d
raw
n fro
m m
any
reso
urce
s, im
prov
ed c
oord
inat
ion
of
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce
deliv
ery,
and
a s
impl
e, s
traig
ht-fo
rwar
d m
echa
nism
for
acce
ssin
g th
e re
sour
ces
to a
ddre
ss v
ulne
rabi
litie
s or
targ
et d
evel
opm
ent
oppo
rtuni
ties.
Toro
nto
Inte
rnat
iona
l Lea
ders
hip
Cen
ter
for F
inan
cial
Sec
tor S
uper
visi
on
Seni
or s
uper
viso
rs a
nd c
urre
nt a
nd fu
ture
use
rs o
f fin
anci
al
serv
ices
. D
evel
opm
ent o
f an
actio
n pl
an fo
r a p
robl
em th
ey fa
ce, a
nd p
ract
ice
in u
sing
va
rious
tool
s fo
r doi
ng s
o; le
arni
ng le
ader
ship
beh
avio
rs fr
om le
ader
s; a
nd
expa
nded
net
wor
k of
col
leag
ues
with
sha
red
new
per
spec
tives
.
• A
poin
t of e
ntry
to e
ngag
e w
ith a
rang
e of
sta
keho
lder
s to
dis
cuss
thei
r ex
perie
nce
and
pers
pect
ives
tow
ards
impr
ovin
g po
licie
s an
d pr
actic
es fo
r ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
of N
GO
s.
The
ulti
mat
e be
nefic
iarie
s of
the
FSSF
are
dev
elop
ing
coun
tries
vul
nera
ble
to fi
nanc
ial i
nsta
bilit
y, a
nd p
artic
ular
ly
thei
r poo
r inh
abita
nts
who
are
usu
ally
the
hard
est h
it by
fin
anci
al c
risis
. In
the
inte
rmed
iate
term
, the
ben
efic
iarie
s in
clud
e al
l par
tner
s in
volv
ed, p
artic
ular
ly th
e W
orld
Ban
k,
IMF
othe
r mul
tilat
eral
ban
ks, b
ilate
ral a
genc
ies
and
deve
lopm
ent o
rgan
izat
ions
wor
king
on
stre
ngth
enin
g fin
anci
al s
yste
ms.
The
aim
of t
he F
SSF
is to
is to
cre
ate
a sy
stem
atic
mec
hani
sm fo
r pro
vidi
ng c
ount
ries
with
the
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce
supp
ort t
hey
need
to b
uild
mor
e ro
bust
fin
anci
al s
yste
ms.
Annex J 66
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Fina
ncia
l Sec
tor A
sses
smen
t Pro
gram
D
irect
ben
efic
iarie
s ar
e th
ose
coun
tries
that
par
ticip
ate.
En
hanc
ed c
apac
ity fo
r the
fina
ncia
l sec
tor t
o in
term
edia
te
grow
th a
nd im
prov
ed a
cces
s to
fina
ncia
l ser
vice
s –
two
goal
s in
tend
ed fo
r cou
ntrie
s th
at p
artic
ipat
e in
the
FSAP
–
bene
fit th
e fu
ll sp
ectru
m o
f peo
ple
livin
g in
thos
e co
untri
es.
Fina
ncia
l Sta
bilit
y Fo
rum
D
irect
ben
efic
iarie
s ar
e al
l cou
ntrie
s th
at a
re a
ctiv
e in
in
tern
atio
nal f
inan
cial
mar
kets
. Ulti
mat
ely,
eve
ry c
ount
ry
bene
fits
from
incr
ease
d gl
obal
fina
ncia
l sta
bilit
y.
Partn
ersh
ip fo
r Chi
ld D
evel
opm
ent
The
prop
osed
act
iviti
es fo
rm a
n in
trins
ic p
art o
f the
wor
k pr
ogra
m o
f the
Par
tner
ship
for C
hild
Dev
elop
men
t (PC
D).
The
maj
or fo
cus
of P
CD
’s c
ontin
ued
activ
ity is
in th
e cr
eatio
n an
d di
ssem
inat
ion
of k
now
ledg
e on
effe
ctiv
e sc
hool
hea
lth
stra
tegi
es, t
o pr
omot
e an
d st
reng
then
com
mun
icat
ion
and
know
ledg
e ne
twor
ks, a
nd c
ross
-sec
tora
l par
tner
ship
s in
the
field
of s
choo
l hea
lth. P
CD
aim
s to
stre
ngth
en th
ese
initi
ativ
es b
y co
ntin
uing
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f lin
ks w
ith
gove
rnm
ents
, don
ors,
tech
nica
l ins
titut
ions
and
civ
il so
ciet
y.
PCD
’s c
olla
bora
tive
prog
ram
s co
ntin
ue to
dem
onst
rate
the
posi
tive
impa
ct o
f sch
ool h
ealth
inte
rven
tions
on
child
ren’
s he
alth
and
lear
ning
out
com
es. T
his
is p
artic
ular
ly a
ppar
ent
for t
he m
ost d
isad
vant
aged
chi
ldre
n, ty
pica
lly th
e ru
ral p
oor
and
the
girl
child
. PC
D ta
rget
s ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
for t
he
poor
est c
ount
ries,
thus
focu
sing
prim
arily
on
Afric
a. A
n in
ter-
sect
oral
stu
dy o
n ed
ucat
ion,
hea
lth a
nd h
ome
back
grou
nd
char
acte
ristic
s to
enh
ance
long
-term
mon
itorin
g an
d na
tiona
l po
licy
mak
ing
in S
ri La
nka
has
been
pro
pose
d.
The
PCD
pro
gram
sup
ports
an
inte
rage
ncy
partn
ersh
ip
(UN
ESC
O, U
NIC
EF, W
HO
and
Wor
ld B
ank)
initi
ativ
e—th
e FR
ESH
Sta
rt Ap
proa
ch (F
ocus
ing
Res
ourc
es o
n Ef
fect
ive
Scho
ol H
ealth
). Th
is in
itiat
ive
serv
es to
pro
mot
e a
basi
c fra
mew
ork
from
whi
ch a
n ef
fect
ive
scho
ol h
ealth
pro
gram
ca
n be
impl
emen
ted
that
will
cont
ribut
e di
rect
ly to
impr
oved
le
arni
ng. T
o da
te, 1
1 co
untri
es h
ave
adop
ted
the
FRES
H
star
t app
roac
h, e
ach
coun
try a
dapt
ing
the
fram
ewor
k to
re
spon
d to
the
spec
ific
need
s of
thei
r ow
n ch
ildre
n an
d m
any
choo
sing
to d
o th
is th
roug
h W
orld
Ban
k pr
ojec
ts. P
art o
f PC
D’s
con
tinui
ng w
ork
wou
ld b
e to
sup
port
thes
e ac
tiviti
es,
lend
ing
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce,
ena
blin
g re
sear
ch a
nd q
ualit
y as
sura
nce
whe
n re
quire
d, a
nd a
lso
to p
rom
ote
the
unde
rsta
ndin
g an
d th
e ad
optio
n of
this
stra
tegy
in o
ther
co
untri
es.
Expl
aine
d to
the
left.
67 Annex J
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
UN
ESC
O In
stitu
te o
f Sta
tistic
s Th
e be
nefic
iarie
s of
the
UIS
pro
gram
will
be a
ll us
ers
of th
e da
ta c
olle
cted
, ana
lyze
d an
d di
ssem
inat
ed. I
n pa
rticu
lar,
this
w
ill in
clud
e po
licy-
mak
ers
at n
atio
nal a
nd in
tern
atio
nal
leve
ls, i
nclu
ding
the
Wor
ld B
ank,
thro
ugh
impr
ovem
ents
in
the
qual
ity, t
imel
ines
s an
d re
leva
nce
of th
e ou
tput
s an
d th
roug
h th
e di
ssem
inat
ion
of m
ore
com
preh
ensi
ve
info
rmat
ion.
Ben
efic
iarie
s w
ill al
so in
clud
e da
ta p
rovi
ders
si
nce
the
UIS
is c
omm
itted
to w
orki
ng w
ith th
em, e
spec
ially
th
ose
in th
e de
velo
ping
wor
ld. U
IS s
ub-p
roje
cts
will
supp
ort
them
in th
e co
llect
ion
of a
ccur
ate
and
com
plet
e da
ta, a
nd
assi
st th
em in
ens
urin
g th
at th
ese
data
are
use
d w
ithin
thei
r ow
n co
untri
es to
info
rm th
e ev
alua
tion
and
deve
lopm
ent o
f po
licy.
Fur
ther
mor
e, U
IS w
ill co
ordi
nate
sta
tistic
al c
apac
ity-
build
ing
effo
rts o
f dev
elop
ing
coun
tries
in L
atin
Am
eric
a an
d C
arib
bean
regi
on (O
REA
LC p
roje
ct) a
nd th
e M
iddl
e Ea
st
and
Nor
th A
frica
regi
on (P
APED
pro
ject
). Th
e Pa
n Ar
ab
Proj
ect f
or E
duca
tion
Dec
isio
n Su
ppor
t (PA
PED
) pro
ject
in
parti
cula
r will
bene
fit M
inis
tries
of E
duca
tion
and
educ
atio
nal
inst
itutio
ns in
the
Arab
Sta
tes
incl
udin
g: E
gypt
, Jor
dan,
Pa
lest
inia
n N
atio
nal A
utho
rity,
Leb
anon
, Tun
isia
, Mor
occo
, Al
geria
, Mau
ritan
ia, D
jibou
ti, S
yria
, Sud
an, L
ibya
, Ira
q,
Yem
en, a
nd A
rab
Gul
f Sta
tes.
Sta
keho
lder
s an
d be
nefic
iarie
s of
acc
urat
e an
d co
mpr
ehen
sive
info
rmat
ion
will
incl
ude
data
use
rs a
nd d
ata
prov
ider
s, p
olic
ymak
ers,
ed
ucat
iona
l pla
nner
s, e
duca
tiona
l dire
ctor
s, s
choo
l pr
inci
pals
at n
atio
nal l
evel
, the
UN
ESC
O, t
he W
orld
Ban
k,
and
othe
r int
erna
tiona
l don
ors
at th
e in
tern
atio
nal a
nd
regi
onal
leve
ls.
Expl
aine
d to
the
left.
Annex J 68
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
OEC
D W
orld
Edu
catio
n In
dica
tors
Pr
ogra
m
The
bene
ficia
ries
of th
e Pr
ogra
m fo
r Edu
catio
n St
atis
tics
(PES
) will
be a
ll us
ers
of th
e da
ta c
olle
cted
, ana
lyze
d an
d di
ssem
inat
ed b
y U
IS/O
ECD
for t
he W
EI p
roje
ct. I
n pa
rticu
lar,
this
will
incl
ude
polic
y-m
aker
s at
nat
iona
l and
in
tern
atio
nal l
evel
s, in
clud
ing
the
Wor
ld B
ank,
thro
ugh
impr
ovem
ents
in th
e qu
ality
, tim
elin
ess
and
rele
vanc
e of
the
outp
uts
and
thro
ugh
the
diss
emin
atio
n of
mor
e co
mpr
ehen
sive
info
rmat
ion.
Ben
efic
iarie
s w
ill al
so in
clud
e da
ta p
rovi
ders
sin
ce th
e U
IS/O
ECD
are
com
mitt
ed to
w
orki
ng w
ith th
em, e
spec
ially
thos
e in
the
deve
lopi
ng w
orld
(E
gypt
, Mor
occo
, Sri
Lank
a, T
unis
ia a
nd Z
imba
bwe
join
ed
the
WEI
pro
gram
dur
ing
its s
econ
d ph
ase
and
Para
guay
, U
rugu
ay, a
nd P
eru
have
requ
este
d an
d be
en g
rant
ed
parti
cipa
tion
on th
e un
ders
tand
ing
that
they
will
cove
r the
ir ow
n in
tern
atio
nal o
verh
ead
cost
s). T
he W
EI p
roje
ct s
uppo
rts
them
in th
e co
llect
ion
of a
ccur
ate
and
com
plet
e da
ta, a
nd
assi
st th
em in
ens
urin
g th
at th
ese
data
are
use
d w
ithin
thei
r ow
n co
untri
es to
info
rm th
e ev
alua
tion
and
deve
lopm
ent o
f po
licy.
Sta
keho
lder
s an
d be
nefic
iarie
s of
acc
urat
e an
d co
mpr
ehen
sive
info
rmat
ion
will
incl
ude
data
use
rs a
nd d
ata
prov
ider
s, p
olic
ymak
ers,
edu
catio
nal p
lann
ers,
edu
catio
nal
dire
ctor
s, s
choo
l prin
cipa
ls a
t nat
iona
l lev
el, t
he U
NES
CO
, th
e W
orld
Ban
k, a
nd o
ther
inte
rnat
iona
l don
ors
at
inte
rnat
iona
l and
nat
iona
l lev
els.
Expl
aine
d to
the
left.
Tren
ds in
Mat
hem
atic
s an
d Sc
ienc
e Ac
hiev
emen
t Aro
und
the
Wor
ld
Bene
ficia
ries
incl
ude
the
20 c
ount
ries
(Arm
enia
, Bot
swan
a,
Bulg
aria
, Cze
ch R
epub
lic, H
unga
ry, I
ndon
esia
, Lat
via,
Li
thua
nia,
Mac
edon
ia, M
alay
sia,
Mol
dova
, Mor
occo
, Ph
ilippi
nes,
Rom
ania
, Rus
sian
Fed
erat
ion,
Slo
vak
Rep
ublic
, Sl
oven
ia, S
outh
Afri
ca T
haila
nd, T
unis
ia, Y
ugos
lavi
a), t
hose
w
orki
ng in
the
educ
atio
n se
ctor
, e.g
., na
tiona
l gov
ernm
ents
, in
tern
atio
nal i
nstit
utio
ns s
uch
as th
e W
orld
Ban
k an
d U
NES
CO
, oth
er o
rgan
izat
ions
suc
h as
uni
vers
ities
and
re
sear
ch o
rgan
izat
ions
in p
artic
ipat
ing
coun
tries
con
cern
ed
with
mon
itorin
g an
d im
prov
ing
educ
atio
n qu
ality
, and
ul
timat
ely
the
stud
ents
. The
resu
lts w
ill be
repo
rted
in b
oth
inte
rnat
iona
l and
cou
ntry
-spe
cific
pub
licat
ions
, and
the
full
data
arc
hive
s m
ade
avai
labl
e on
CD
-RO
Ms
and
thou
gh th
e In
tern
et. F
or th
e pa
rtici
patin
g lo
w- a
nd m
iddl
e-in
com
e co
untri
es, t
he s
tudy
will
serv
e as
an
inte
rnat
iona
l ben
chm
ark
agai
nst w
hich
to m
easu
re fu
ture
pro
gres
s an
d fo
r tho
se w
ho
have
par
ticip
ated
in th
e pa
st, t
he fi
rst o
ppor
tuni
ty to
mea
sure
ch
ange
ove
r tim
e.
Expl
aine
d to
the
left.
69 Annex J
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Prog
ress
in In
tern
atio
nal R
eadi
ng
Lite
racy
Stu
dy
The
bene
ficia
ries
incl
ude
the
15 lo
w- a
nd m
iddl
e-in
com
e co
untri
es, t
hose
wor
king
in th
e ed
ucat
ion
sect
or, e
.g.,
natio
nal g
over
nmen
ts, i
nter
natio
nal i
nstit
utio
ns s
uch
as th
e W
orld
Ban
k an
d U
NES
CO
, oth
er o
rgan
izat
ions
suc
h as
un
iver
sitie
s an
d re
sear
ch o
rgan
izat
ions
in p
artic
ipat
ing
coun
tries
con
cern
ed w
ith m
onito
ring
and
impr
ovin
g ed
ucat
ion
qual
ity, a
nd u
ltim
atel
y th
e st
uden
ts. F
or th
e pa
rtici
patin
g lo
w- a
nd m
iddl
e-in
com
e co
untri
es, t
he s
tudy
will
serv
e as
an
inte
rnat
iona
l ben
chm
ark
agai
nst w
hich
to
mea
sure
futu
re p
rogr
ess.
Thi
s pr
ojec
t’s o
utco
mes
incl
ude
inte
rnat
iona
l ben
chm
arks
of s
tude
nt p
erfo
rman
ce th
at m
ay
be u
sed
(with
oth
er m
easu
res)
as
indi
cato
rs o
f edu
catio
nal
effic
acy.
In a
dditi
on, t
he d
esig
n of
the
stud
y is
suc
h th
at a
t ris
k po
pula
tions
may
be
iden
tifie
d at
the
loca
l lev
el a
nd
issu
es o
f equ
ity re
late
d to
race
, gen
der a
nd s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic
stat
us m
ay b
e ad
dres
sed.
Iden
tific
atio
n of
thes
e fa
ctor
s in
as
soci
atio
n w
ith th
eir a
ntec
eden
ts c
an c
ontri
bute
to
stra
tegi
es th
at le
ad to
the
impr
ovem
ent o
f edu
catio
nal a
nd
soci
al li
fe c
hanc
es fo
r ind
ivid
uals
.
Expl
aine
d to
the
left.
Inte
nded
dire
ct b
enef
icia
ries
are
Seco
ndar
y St
uden
ts,
Teac
hers
, Pre
-Ser
vice
Tea
cher
Tra
inee
s, a
nd E
duca
tion
Polic
ymak
ers,
in s
even
(7) W
orld
Lin
ks c
ount
ries.
Thes
e in
divi
dual
s w
ill re
ceiv
e im
prov
ed a
nd e
xpan
ded
educ
atio
nal
oppo
rtuni
ties,
and
dev
elop
ski
lls in
effe
ctiv
e us
e of
info
rmat
ion
and
com
mun
icat
ion
tech
nolo
gies
. In
the
med
ium
to lo
nger
-term
, em
ploy
men
t pr
ospe
cts
for p
artic
ipat
ing
yout
h ar
e ex
pect
ed to
be
enha
nced
, and
gra
duat
es
will
be a
ble
to h
elp
thei
r cou
ntrie
s co
mpe
te in
a g
loba
l eco
nom
y in
the
Info
rmat
ion
Age.
It is
als
o ex
pect
ed th
at th
e Pr
ogra
m w
ill co
ntrib
ute
to a
na
rrow
ing
the
in-c
ount
ry g
ap b
etw
een
the
“info
rmat
ion
have
s” in
urb
an a
reas
an
d th
e “in
form
atio
n ha
ve-n
ots”
in ru
ral a
reas
, as
two-
third
s of
Wor
ld L
inks
sc
hool
s ar
e pu
blic
sch
ools
loca
ted
outs
ide
capi
tal c
ities
, a s
hare
whi
ch is
ex
pect
ed to
gro
w w
ith D
GF
fund
ing.
Las
tly, i
n FY
2002
, a n
ew tr
aini
ng in
itiat
ive
desi
gned
with
FY2
001
DG
F fu
nds
to d
isse
min
ate
less
ons
lear
ned
from
thre
e ye
ars
of W
orld
Lin
ks P
rogr
am e
xper
ienc
e w
ill be
nefit
sen
ior-l
evel
pol
icym
aker
s in
min
istri
es o
f edu
catio
n, te
leco
mm
unic
atio
ns, a
nd fi
nanc
e.
Focu
sing
Res
ourc
es o
n Ef
fect
ive
Scho
ol
Hea
lth
The
inte
nded
ben
efic
iarie
s of
the
FRES
H p
rogr
am a
re p
upils
an
d pe
rson
s re
spon
sibl
e fo
r sch
ool h
ealth
pro
gram
s in
the
Bank
’s c
lient
cou
ntrie
s, s
tude
nts,
teac
hers
, hea
lth w
orke
rs,
scho
ols,
and
com
mun
ity g
roup
s.
Bene
ficia
ries
of th
e FR
ESH
pro
gram
act
iviti
es h
ave
acce
ss to
inte
grat
ed s
choo
l he
alth
pro
gram
s in
all
scho
ols—
heal
th re
late
d sc
hool
pol
icie
s, s
afe
wat
er a
nd
sani
tatio
n (th
e es
sent
ial f
irst s
teps
tow
ards
a h
ealth
y ph
ysic
al, l
earn
ing
envi
ronm
ent),
ski
lls- b
ased
hea
lth e
duca
tion,
and
sch
ool-b
ased
hea
lth a
nd
nutri
tion
serv
ices
. Ben
efic
iarie
s en
joy
the
adva
ntag
e of
inte
rnat
iona
l exc
hang
e of
info
rmat
ion
on s
choo
l hea
lth. F
RES
H c
reat
es a
nd s
usta
ins
a co
mm
on v
isio
n of
sch
ool h
ealth
am
ong
deve
lopm
ent a
genc
ies
to fo
cus
and
optim
ize
supp
ort
whi
ch b
enef
its c
lient
s. F
RES
H p
rovi
des
conc
ise
and
soun
d re
ason
s to
fost
er
effe
ctiv
e pa
rtner
ship
s be
twee
n ed
ucat
ion
and
heal
th s
ecto
rs, t
each
ers
and
heal
th w
orke
rs, s
choo
ls a
nd c
omm
unity
gro
ups,
and
pup
ils a
nd p
erso
ns
resp
onsi
ble
for s
choo
l hea
lth p
rogr
ams.
Wor
ld L
inks
for D
evel
opm
ent
Annex J 70
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Cen
tre o
f Exc
elle
nce
for N
utrit
ion,
In
tern
atio
nal C
entre
for D
iarrh
eal
Dis
ease
Res
earc
h, B
angl
ades
h
Glo
bal F
orum
for H
ealth
Res
earc
h Th
e in
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
are
the
poor
in d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es, t
he g
over
nmen
ts a
nd a
genc
ies
enab
led
to p
rovi
de
mor
e ef
fect
ive
rem
edie
s, a
nd th
e in
stitu
tions
who
se c
apac
ity
is re
info
rced
by
invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e re
sear
ch e
fforts
.
At v
ario
us le
vels
thes
e co
mpr
ise:
pro
duct
s, in
form
atio
n, d
evel
opm
ent o
f pr
iorit
izat
ion
met
hodo
logy
for u
se a
t cou
ntry
leve
l, de
velo
ping
cou
ntry
in
volv
emen
t in
inte
rnat
iona
l res
earc
h ef
forts
, dat
a on
hea
lth re
sear
ch fl
ows
to
guid
e de
cisi
on m
aker
s. A
ben
efit
deriv
ing
from
the
Oct
ober
200
0 G
loba
l For
um
com
es fr
om th
e de
cisi
on o
f The
Lan
cet t
o fo
rm a
com
mis
sion
to a
ddre
ss th
e 10
/90
gap
in h
ealth
rese
arch
pub
licat
ion.
The
com
mis
sion
will
look
at p
ract
ical
w
ays
in w
hich
the
jour
nal c
an e
ncou
rage
rese
arch
ers
from
reso
urce
-poo
r co
untri
es to
sub
mit
thei
r wor
k, a
nd a
lso
to p
artic
ipat
e in
its
peer
-revi
ew p
roce
ss
– an
obv
ious
boo
st to
rese
arch
cap
acity
bui
ldin
g, a
nd o
utle
t for
dev
elop
ing
coun
try re
sear
cher
s’ “v
oice
” in
the
rese
arch
age
nda.
Glo
bal A
llianc
e fo
r Vac
cine
s an
d Im
mun
izat
ion
The
ultim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
of G
AVI’s
effo
rts a
re th
e ch
ildre
n,
wom
en a
nd m
en in
the
poor
est 7
4 co
untri
es o
f the
wor
ld.
Nat
iona
l gov
ernm
ents
als
o be
nefit
from
dire
ct s
uppo
rt fo
r th
eir i
mm
uniz
atio
n in
frast
ruct
ure.
To
date
, 36
coun
tries
ac
ross
all
regi
ons
of th
e G
loba
l Sou
th a
re d
estin
ed to
re
ceiv
e va
ccin
es a
nd s
uppo
rt fo
r im
mun
izat
ion
serv
ices
. In
term
edia
te b
enef
icia
ries
also
incl
ude
the
partn
ers-
--na
tiona
l gov
ernm
ents
, UN
age
ncie
s, th
e W
orld
Ban
k, th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
, bila
tera
l gov
ernm
ents
, fou
ndat
ions
, and
ot
hers
—w
ho b
enef
it fro
m th
e en
hanc
ed c
olla
bora
tion
that
th
e G
AVI u
mbr
ella
/coo
rdin
atin
g m
echa
nism
per
mits
.
Glo
bal M
icro
nutri
ent I
nitia
tive
This
var
ies
from
act
ivity
to a
ctiv
ity. I
n ge
nera
l the
dire
ct
bene
ficia
ry is
a g
over
nmen
t or N
GO
that
rece
ives
tech
nica
l as
sist
ance
or c
omm
oditi
es (f
inan
ced
by C
anad
a). U
ltim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
are
poor
chi
ldre
n, w
omen
, and
som
etim
es
who
le p
opul
atio
ns (i
n th
e ca
se o
f foo
d fo
rtific
atio
n) th
at a
re
the
inte
nded
targ
et g
roup
s of
mic
ronu
trien
t pro
gram
s.
Bene
fits
rece
ived
by
gove
rnm
ent a
nd N
GO
s: fe
asib
le s
trate
gies
, rat
iona
lizat
ion
of e
xpen
ditu
res,
mor
e ef
ficie
nt u
se o
f don
or re
sour
ces,
tech
nica
l upg
radi
ng,
cred
ibilit
y fro
m im
plem
entin
g su
cces
sful
pro
gram
that
reac
hes
the
poor
.
The
prin
cipa
l ben
efit
that
the
ultim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
rece
ive
is p
rote
ctio
n ag
ains
t ki
ller d
isea
ses
thro
ugh
vacc
inat
ion,
suc
h as
the
rout
ine
6 va
ccin
es, a
nd
impr
oved
sys
tem
s fo
r im
mun
izat
ions
. In
addi
tion,
GAV
I and
the
Vacc
ine
Fund
ha
ve m
ade
it po
ssib
le fo
r poo
r cou
ntrie
s to
pro
tect
thei
r citi
zens
aga
inst
di
seas
es fo
r whi
ch n
ewer
and
mor
e ex
pens
ive
vacc
ines
hav
e be
en p
urch
ased
, e.
g.; H
epat
itis
b an
d H
aem
ophi
lus
influ
enza
e ty
pe b
(hib
). G
AVI a
nd th
e Va
ccin
e Fu
nd h
ave
also
stim
ulat
ed p
olic
y di
alog
ue re
late
d to
imm
uniz
atio
ns.
One
of t
he b
enef
its o
f GAV
I has
als
o be
en th
at g
aps-
--fin
anci
al a
nd te
chni
cal--
-in
rela
tion
to im
mun
izat
ions
are
bei
ng id
entif
ied
and
addr
esse
d. O
ne o
f the
pe
rhap
s un
inte
nded
ben
efits
has
bee
n in
crea
sed
focu
s on
hea
lth o
utco
mes
, as
GAV
I has
ado
pted
a p
erfo
rman
ce-b
ased
(so-
calle
d “s
hare
s”) a
ppro
ach.
GAV
I ha
s al
so h
ad th
e un
inte
nded
effe
ct o
f enc
oura
ging
new
and
cre
ativ
e st
rate
gies
w
hich
brin
g fin
anci
ng d
own
to th
e co
mm
unity
leve
l. Th
us, e
xplo
ring
new
and
cr
eativ
e fin
anci
ng s
chem
es h
as b
een
an im
porta
nt, r
elat
ed s
pin-
off o
f the
larg
er
GAV
I par
tner
ship
.
71 Annex J
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Popu
latio
n an
d R
epro
duct
ive
Hea
lth
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g Pr
ogra
m
A) th
e co
mm
unity
leve
l men
and
wom
en w
ho p
artic
ipat
e in
th
e re
cipi
ent p
rogr
ams
both
as
mem
bers
and
ben
efic
iarie
s,
and
B) th
e in
tern
atio
nal N
GO
s ac
tive
in th
e di
fficu
lt fie
ld o
f re
prod
uctiv
e he
alth
for w
hom
Ban
k su
ppor
t pro
vide
s le
vera
ge w
ith o
ther
don
ors.
The
pro
gram
has
sig
nific
ant
“mul
tiplie
r” ef
fect
s: n
ot o
nly
have
som
e of
the
loca
l gro
ups
foun
d su
ppor
t fro
m d
onor
s su
ch a
s G
TZ, t
he E
C, U
NIC
EF
and
UN
FPA,
but
als
o su
ppor
t fro
m p
rivat
e se
ctor
gro
ups.
Fo
r exa
mpl
e, a
you
th o
rgan
izat
ion
in E
thio
pia
addr
essi
ng th
e pr
oble
m o
f AID
S re
ceiv
ed B
ank
supp
ort t
hrou
gh th
e G
erm
an
Wor
ld P
opul
atio
n Fo
unda
tion,
and
then
from
Dai
mle
r C
hrys
ler a
nd H
ewle
tt Pa
ckar
d w
ho b
uilt
a tra
inin
g ce
nter
, an
d pr
ovid
ed c
ompu
ters
.
Supp
ort i
n ad
dres
sing
thei
r ow
n pe
rcei
ved
need
s; te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e at
a
subs
tant
ive
leve
l; te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e in
org
aniz
atio
n bu
ildin
g; li
nks
to
info
rmat
ion
reso
urce
s; li
nks
to b
road
er in
itiat
ives
; par
ticip
atio
n in
sup
porti
ng
netw
orks
.
Rol
l Bac
k M
alar
ia
Peo
ple
suffe
ring
with
mal
aria
. Hea
lth s
yste
ms
burd
ened
w
ith m
alar
ia p
atie
nts.
In
crea
sed
prio
ritiz
atio
n of
mal
aria
– re
sulti
ng in
bet
ter t
rain
ed s
taff,
mor
e co
st-
effe
ctiv
e pr
otoc
ols,
incr
ease
d ed
ucat
ion
on m
alar
ia, a
cces
s to
bed
nets
, acc
ess
to e
ffect
ive
antim
alar
ials
.
Spec
ial P
rogr
am fo
r Res
earc
h an
d Tr
aini
ng in
Tro
pica
l Dis
ease
s Th
e in
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
are
the
poor
and
dis
adva
ntag
ed
popu
latio
ns a
ffect
ed w
ith th
ese
dise
ases
. Th
e ul
timat
e be
nefit
is p
over
ty re
duct
ion,
targ
etin
g th
e po
ores
t of t
he p
oor,
and
prom
otin
g su
stai
nabl
e ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent.
A lif
e w
ithou
t a d
isab
ling
or
disf
igur
ing
dise
ase,
rest
orin
g th
eir h
uman
dig
nity
.
Men
and
wom
en o
f rep
rodu
ctiv
e ag
e w
ho w
ish
to d
ecid
e on
th
e si
ze a
nd ti
min
g of
thei
r fam
ilies,
and
the
gove
rnm
ents
w
ho w
ish
to p
rovi
de a
cces
s to
fam
ily p
lann
ing
for b
oth
repr
oduc
tive
heal
th, a
nd to
sta
biliz
e po
pula
tion
grow
th. I
n ad
ditio
n, re
sear
ch c
apac
ity in
the
field
of r
epro
duct
ive
heal
th
is s
treng
then
ed a
) by
the
invo
lvem
ent o
f dev
elop
ing
coun
try
inst
itutio
ns in
the
glob
al n
etw
ork
of c
olla
bora
ting
cent
ers,
an
d b)
by
the
capa
city
bui
ldin
g ar
m o
f the
pro
gram
.
Gre
ater
cho
ice
in c
ontra
cept
ion
(ass
ocia
ted
with
incr
ease
d pr
eval
ence
), gr
eate
r as
sura
nce
of s
afet
y, fe
wer
sid
e ef
fect
s (b
oth
maj
or re
ason
s fo
r non
-use
or
disc
ontin
uatio
n) –
and
mor
e ge
nera
lly fo
r the
chi
ldre
n in
sm
alle
r fam
ilies,
bet
ter
chan
ce o
f sur
viva
l, be
tter n
utrit
ion
and
grea
ter s
choo
ling.
Per
haps
at a
leve
l on
e m
ore
rem
oved
: cou
ntrie
s th
at h
ave
expe
rienc
ed fe
rtilit
y re
duct
ions
hav
e re
aped
a “d
emog
raph
ic b
onus
” – th
e gr
owth
in th
e w
orki
ng a
ge p
opul
atio
n ha
ving
con
tribu
ted
to m
ore
rapi
d ec
onom
ic d
evel
opm
ent
Stop
TB
1. L
ow in
com
e de
velo
ping
nat
ions
and
mid
dle-
inco
me
coun
tries
with
hig
h TB
bur
dens
as
wel
l as
indu
stria
lized
na
tions
with
TB
risks
. 2. T
hose
wor
king
to c
ontro
l TB,
de
velo
p ne
w to
ols
or re
late
d ch
alle
nges
(HIV
/AID
S) (d
rug
supp
ly) i
n al
l nat
ions
. 3. T
B pa
tient
s an
d po
pula
tions
at r
isk
–ul
timat
e be
nefic
iarie
s.
1. A
cces
s to
new
reso
urce
s (b
oth
dire
ctly
from
Sto
p TB
or t
hrou
gh p
artn
ers
parti
cipa
ting
in S
top
TB).
2. R
apid
sha
ring
of n
ews,
bes
t pra
ctic
es. 3
. R
ecom
men
datio
ns o
r prio
rity
inve
stm
ents
, ass
ista
nces
in d
evel
opm
ent a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n of
stra
tegi
c pl
ans.
4. P
oliti
cal a
ttent
ion
to p
robl
ems.
5. D
irect
ac
cess
to d
rugs
.
UN
Adm
inis
trativ
e an
d C
oord
inat
ing
Com
mitt
ee, S
ubco
mm
ittee
on
Nut
ritio
n Be
ing
upda
ted
on n
utrit
ion
situ
atio
n, p
rogr
am a
nd p
olic
y de
velo
pmen
t, be
tter
coor
dina
tion
with
oth
ers,
pre
ssur
e on
nor
mat
ive
agen
cies
to fo
cus
on k
ey
issu
es.
UN
AID
S In
term
edia
te: T
hose
infe
cted
and
affe
cted
by
HIV
/AID
S.
Ulti
mat
e: T
he n
ext g
ener
atio
n in
Afri
ca (i
n its
ent
irety
), an
d po
tent
ially
in o
ther
regi
ons.
Adeq
uate
fund
ing,
the
crea
tion
of a
favo
rabl
e en
viro
nmen
t to
exec
ute
cultu
rally
ap
prop
riate
pro
gram
s of
thei
r ow
n de
sign
, bet
ter c
are
and
treat
men
t (fo
r the
in
fect
ed),
bette
r sup
port
(for t
he a
ffect
ed),
and
aver
ted
HIV
infe
ctio
n (fo
r tho
se
not i
nfec
ted)
.
Spec
ial P
rogr
am o
f Res
earc
h,
Dev
elop
men
t and
Res
earc
h Tr
aini
ng in
H
uman
Rep
rodu
ctio
n
Dire
ct b
enef
icia
ries
are
agen
cies
and
thei
r sta
ff, in
dire
ct
bene
ficia
ries
are
coun
try g
over
nmen
ts, l
ocal
org
aniz
atio
ns
and
wor
kers
in th
e fie
ld o
f nut
ritio
n, a
nd v
ulne
rabl
e gr
oups
, pa
rticu
larly
wom
en a
nd c
hild
ren
in d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es.
Annex J 72
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Com
mis
sion
on
Mac
roec
onom
ics
and
Hea
lth
The
ultim
ate
inte
nded
ben
efic
iarie
s ar
e po
or p
eopl
e in
leas
t de
velo
ped
coun
tries
, lik
ely
inte
rmed
iate
ben
efic
iarie
s ar
e th
e po
licy
anal
ysts
and
sta
ff of
the
a) g
over
nmen
t age
ncie
s, a
nd
b) d
onor
/dev
elop
men
t age
ncie
s w
ho w
ork
at v
ario
us s
tage
s on
the
on th
e de
sign
, im
plem
enta
tion
and/
or e
valu
atio
n of
he
alth
pol
icie
s.
Lym
phat
ic F
illiar
iasi
s R
ural
dis
enfra
nchi
sed
grou
ps a
re th
e ul
timat
e be
nefic
iarie
s.
A lif
e w
ithou
t a d
isab
ling
and
disf
igur
ing
dise
ase,
rest
orin
g th
eir h
uman
dig
nity
.
Soci
al P
rote
ctio
n fo
r the
Info
rmal
Ec
onom
y Th
e ul
timat
e be
nefic
iarie
s ar
e vu
lner
able
wor
kers
in th
e in
form
al e
cono
my.
The
inte
rmed
iate
ben
efic
iarie
s ar
e Ba
nk
staf
f who
wor
k on
labo
r mar
kets
, pov
erty
redu
ctio
n, a
nd
soci
al in
clus
ions
, as
wel
l as
our c
ount
erpa
rts in
gov
ernm
ent
Min
istri
es o
f Lab
or (a
lso,
Dev
elop
men
t, Fi
nanc
e, P
lann
ing,
et
c) a
nd o
ur p
artn
er-p
ract
ition
ers
in W
EIG
O a
nd th
e IL
O.
It is
hop
ed th
at th
e ul
timat
e be
nefic
iarie
s - t
he p
oor a
nd v
ulne
rabl
e w
orke
rs -
enjo
y gr
eate
r sec
urity
in th
eir i
ncom
es, h
ealth
, wor
k an
d tra
inin
g op
portu
nitie
s,
and
inco
me
supp
ort f
or re
tirem
ent a
nd p
erio
ds o
f une
mpl
oym
ent.
Bank
sta
ff,
gove
rnm
ent c
ount
erpa
rts, a
nd p
ut p
artn
ers
will
gain
gre
ater
kno
wle
dge
abou
t w
hose
mos
t vul
nera
ble
and
why
and
wha
t typ
es o
f int
erve
ntio
ns a
nd
regu
latio
ns c
an b
est a
ssis
t poo
r wor
kers
. The
re is
a p
oten
tial n
et b
enef
it of
po
licy
cohe
renc
e fo
r tho
se w
orki
ng a
t the
gra
ssro
ots
leve
l (e.
g. W
IEG
O) a
nd
Bank
sta
ff an
d go
vern
men
t offi
cial
s w
orki
ng a
t the
pol
icy
leve
l.
Und
erst
andi
ng C
hild
ren’
s W
ork
The
mai
n be
nefic
iarie
s of
this
pro
gram
are
cou
ntrie
s w
here
ch
ild la
bor i
s a
maj
or p
robl
em. I
t is
esse
ntia
l to
incr
ease
ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
with
in c
ount
ries,
and
this
obj
ectiv
e re
mai
ns
an in
tegr
al p
art o
f the
pro
ject
. The
UC
W p
roje
ct w
ill ai
m to
st
reng
then
the
appr
opria
te c
apac
ity fo
r dat
a an
alys
is a
nd
use
of th
e in
form
atio
n by
hel
ping
to id
entif
y an
d di
rect
re
sour
ces
whe
re th
ey a
re m
ost n
eede
d. T
he U
CW
Pro
ject
w
ill ai
m to
add
ress
this
obj
ectiv
e im
plic
itly
thro
ugh
the
incl
usio
n of
rese
arch
ers,
fiel
d pe
rson
nel f
rom
the
agen
cies
an
d ot
hers
from
dev
elop
ing
coun
tries
in th
e lis
ted
activ
ities
. Th
e U
CW
Pro
ject
will
also
add
ress
this
nee
d m
ore
expl
icitl
y by
hos
ting
a re
gion
al w
orks
hop
and
deve
lopm
ent o
f a
train
ing
pack
et. S
peci
fic a
ctiv
ities
to s
uppo
rt th
is g
oal i
nclu
de
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
Tra
inin
g Pa
cket
on
Chi
ld L
abou
r, th
e Fi
elds
Bas
ed N
eeds
Ass
essm
ent/R
egio
nal W
orks
hop,
su
ppor
ting
rese
arch
thro
ugh
dire
ct fu
ndin
g to
loca
l re
sear
cher
s, p
rom
otin
g in
clus
ion
of c
hild
labo
ur p
anel
s on
ec
onom
ic s
ympo
sium
s, a
nd th
e U
CW
Wor
king
Pap
er s
erie
s.In
the
inte
rim, b
enef
icia
ries
will
also
incl
ude
othe
r m
ultil
ater
als,
bila
tera
l, an
d na
tiona
l age
ncie
s w
orki
ng o
n th
is
issu
e. T
he U
CW
pro
ject
will
help
to d
evel
op a
glo
bal n
etw
ork
of e
xper
ts, b
uilt
on a
prin
cipl
e of
incr
ease
d kn
owle
dge
shar
ing
and
effe
ctiv
e us
e of
lim
ited
reso
urce
s.
See
to th
e le
ft.
Pote
ntia
lly o
nly,
and
an
indi
rect
but
impo
rtant
ben
efit,
the
CM
H m
ay b
e ab
le to
ge
nera
te g
reat
er p
oliti
cal c
omm
itmen
t to
spen
ding
mor
e m
oney
on
inte
rven
tions
that
are
kno
wn
to b
e re
leva
nt to
poo
r hou
seho
lds.
73 Annex J
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Loca
l and
nat
iona
l gov
ernm
ents
, don
ors,
civ
il so
ciet
y or
gani
zatio
ns, d
evel
opm
ent p
rofe
ssio
nals
, res
earc
hers
, co
mm
unity
lead
ers,
bus
ines
s pe
ople
, stu
dent
s, in
dige
nous
gr
oups
, lib
raria
ns, a
nd th
e m
edia
.
The
Gat
eway
hop
es to
offe
r a n
umbe
r of b
enef
its a
nd s
ervi
ces.
The
se in
clud
e:
• pr
omot
ing
dial
ogue
and
col
labo
ratio
n am
ong
loca
l com
mun
ities
/civ
il so
ciet
y, g
over
nmen
ts, d
onor
s, a
cade
mic
and
priv
ate
sect
or g
roup
s on
po
licy
issu
es, d
evel
opm
ent p
rogr
ams,
and
loca
l pro
ject
s
• of
ferin
g gr
eate
r vis
ibilit
y fo
r loc
al d
evel
opm
ent a
ctiv
ities
and
exp
erie
nce,
an
d in
dige
nous
kno
wle
dge,
and
esp
ecia
lly a
mea
ns o
f exc
hang
ing
this
in
form
atio
n be
twee
n de
velo
ping
cou
ntrie
s
• pr
omot
ing
the
exch
ange
of d
onor
aid
info
rmat
ion
and
coor
dina
tion
thro
ugh
a m
ulti-
agen
cy p
roje
cts
data
base
• he
lpin
g bu
ild lo
cal i
nfor
mat
ion
and
com
mun
icat
ion
tech
nolo
gies
(IC
T)
capa
city
to n
arro
w th
e di
gita
l div
ide
by e
stab
lishi
ng C
ount
ry G
atew
ays
• pr
ovid
ing
tool
s fo
r bui
ldin
g ca
paci
ty, t
rain
ing,
and
man
agem
ent a
nd
deliv
ery
of d
ata
• pr
omot
ing
grea
ter g
over
nmen
t tra
nspa
renc
y an
d ac
coun
tabi
lity
thro
ugh
e-go
vern
men
t ini
tiativ
es
• he
lpin
g in
stitu
tions
inte
ract
thro
ugh
aid
mat
chm
akin
g, o
rgan
izat
iona
l di
rect
orie
s, a
nd s
uppo
rting
net
wor
ks
• pr
ovid
ing
data
, sta
tistic
s, a
nd p
ublic
atio
ns o
n de
velo
pmen
t thr
ough
da
taba
ses
and
an o
nlin
e bo
okst
ore
of p
ublic
atio
ns fr
om m
any
sour
ces
• pr
ovid
ing
oppo
rtuni
ties
for o
nlin
e pr
ocur
emen
t and
mar
ketin
g.
Forg
ing
Partn
ersh
ips
for G
ood
Gov
erna
nce
in P
ublic
Exp
endi
ture
and
R
ecor
ds M
anag
emen
t
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent N
etw
ork
Inte
nded
ben
efic
iarie
s of
the
prog
ram
incl
ude
both
de
velo
ping
cou
ntry
rese
arch
ers,
who
rece
ive
supp
ort t
o un
derta
ke th
eir w
ork,
the
broa
der d
evel
opm
ent c
omm
unity
w
hich
gai
ns a
cces
s to
this
rese
arch
, and
pol
icym
aker
s w
ho
can
both
use
the
rese
arch
and
the
incr
ease
d lo
cal p
ool o
f ex
perti
se.
Prin
cipl
e be
nefit
s in
clud
e su
ppor
t for
rese
arch
und
erta
ken
in d
evel
opin
g an
d tra
nsiti
on c
ount
ries,
bui
ldin
g ne
twor
ks w
ith re
sear
cher
s in
oth
er c
ount
ries,
and
ac
cess
to e
xper
t com
men
tato
rs o
n th
eir w
ork.
In a
dditi
on, p
olic
ymak
ers
rece
ive
mor
e lo
cally
pro
duce
d re
sear
ch a
nd a
gre
ater
poo
l of r
esea
rch
expe
rtise
to
draw
upo
n.
Inte
grat
ed F
ram
ewor
k fo
r Tra
de
Leas
t dev
elop
ed c
ount
ries
in th
e fir
st in
stan
ce, b
ut
ultim
atel
y, a
ll lo
w a
nd m
iddl
e in
com
e co
untri
es a
s th
e to
ols,
st
rate
gies
, exp
erie
nces
and
eve
ntua
lly fu
ndin
g be
com
e av
aila
ble
and
appl
icab
le to
them
. Als
o, th
e Ba
nk it
self
is a
be
nefic
iary
to th
e ex
tent
that
the
IF h
as p
rom
pted
a m
uch
clos
er c
oope
ratio
n be
twee
n va
rious
cen
tral u
nits
them
selv
es
(DEC
PG, P
REM
EP,D
ECR
G) a
nd a
mon
g th
ese
and
the
oper
atio
ns.
Thor
ough
ana
lysi
s of
the
impe
dim
ents
to th
eir i
nteg
ratio
n in
to th
e w
orld
ec
onom
y ho
w to
tack
le th
ese
and
the
pove
rty im
pact
; cap
acity
bui
ldin
g,
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce,
gre
ater
voi
ce in
inte
rnat
iona
l for
ums,
a m
ore
focu
sed
and
bette
r coo
rdin
ated
app
roac
h by
dev
elop
men
t age
ncie
s in
thei
r ass
ista
nce
stra
tegy
.
Dev
elop
men
t Gat
eway
Fou
ndat
ion
Annex J 74
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Partn
ersh
ips
in S
tatis
tics
for t
he 2
1st
Cen
tury
(PAR
IS-2
1)
Gov
ernm
ents
, bus
ines
s co
mm
uniti
es, p
opul
atio
n at
larg
e in
th
e co
untri
es c
once
rned
, int
erna
tiona
l com
mun
ity, d
onor
s,
inve
stor
s, e
tc.
Info
rmat
ion,
kno
wle
dge.
DAC
Net
wor
k on
Goo
d G
over
nanc
e an
d C
apac
ity D
evel
opm
ent (
GO
VNET
) M
ost r
ecen
tly d
etai
led
empi
rical
wor
k on
civ
il se
rvic
e le
gisl
atio
n un
derta
ken
by S
IGM
A an
d PU
MA
thro
ugh
the
partn
ersh
ip h
as p
rovi
ded
prac
tical
gui
danc
e fo
r sta
ff w
orki
ng
on c
ivil
serv
ice
refo
rms.
Prac
tical
kno
wle
dge
on g
over
nanc
e in
terv
entio
ns.
Busi
ness
Par
tner
s fo
r Dev
elop
men
t (B
PD)
Inte
rmed
iate
ben
efic
iarie
s:
BPD
-wid
e: d
evel
opm
ent o
rgan
izat
ions
, NG
Os,
gov
ernm
ents
, co
mpa
nies
that
are
stri
ving
to d
evel
op s
ocia
lly re
spon
sibl
e ap
proa
ches
to d
evel
opm
ent.
Each
clu
ster
’s w
ork
prog
ram
in
clud
es m
ajor
cap
acity
-bui
ldin
g su
ppor
t for
loca
l or
gani
zatio
ns w
hich
can
ena
ble
the
priv
ate
sect
or, c
ivil
soci
ety
orga
niza
tions
and
gov
ernm
ent s
truct
ures
to w
ork
toge
ther
. U
ltim
ate
bene
ficia
ries:
N
atur
al R
esou
rces
(oil,
gas
and
min
ing
com
pani
es):
host
co
mm
uniti
es; p
eopl
e af
fect
ed b
y m
ine
clos
ures
. W
ater
& S
anita
tion:
urb
an p
oor.
G
loba
l Par
tner
ship
for Y
outh
Dev
elop
men
t: yo
uth,
the
next
ge
nera
tion
of la
bore
rs a
nd c
onsu
mer
s.
Glo
bal R
oad
Safe
ty P
artn
ersh
ip: c
omm
uniti
es; t
hose
af
fect
ed b
y un
safe
road
con
ditio
ns.
Inte
rmed
iate
ben
efic
iarie
s:
BPD
-wid
e: d
evel
opm
ent o
rgan
izat
ions
, NG
Os,
gov
ernm
ents
, com
pani
es th
at
are
striv
ing
to d
evel
op s
ocia
lly re
spon
sibl
e ap
proa
ches
to d
evel
opm
ent.
– in
form
atio
n, to
ols,
trai
ning
, res
earc
h, g
ood
prac
tice,
net
wor
k of
par
tner
ship
pr
actit
ione
rs.
Ulti
mat
e be
nefic
iarie
s:
Nat
ural
Res
ourc
es (o
il, g
as a
nd m
inin
g co
mpa
nies
): ho
st c
omm
uniti
es; p
eopl
e af
fect
ed b
y m
ine
clos
ures
. – re
dres
s fo
r grie
vanc
es, f
ora
for d
iscu
ssin
g an
d in
fluen
cing
cor
pora
te a
ctio
n, tr
aini
ng.
Wat
er &
San
itatio
n: u
rban
poo
r. –
impr
oved
acc
ess
to s
afe
drin
king
wat
er.
Glo
bal P
artn
ersh
ip fo
r You
th D
evel
opm
ent:
yout
h, th
e ne
xt g
ener
atio
n of
la
bore
rs a
nd c
onsu
mer
s. –
IT e
duca
tion,
saf
er fa
ctor
ies/
wor
kpla
ces,
bet
ter
acce
ss to
hea
lthca
re, a
gric
ultu
re tr
aini
ng.
Glo
bal R
oad
Safe
ty P
artn
ersh
ip: c
omm
uniti
es; t
hose
affe
cted
by
unsa
fe ro
ad
cond
ition
s. –
edu
catio
n on
saf
e pr
actic
es fo
r driv
ers,
pas
seng
ers
and
pede
stria
ns, s
afer
road
way
s.
75 Annex J
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Citi
es A
llianc
e Th
e in
term
edia
te b
enef
icia
ries
are
Allia
nce
mem
ber
orga
niza
tions
- de
velo
pmen
t ban
ks, U
.N. o
rgan
izat
ions
, bi
late
ral d
evel
opm
ent a
genc
ies,
and
inte
rnat
iona
l as
soci
atio
n of
citi
es. T
he u
ltim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
are
loca
l go
vern
men
ts a
nd th
e ur
ban
poor
.
Inte
rmed
iate
ben
efic
iarie
s:
An e
mer
ging
alig
nmen
t of u
rban
dev
elop
men
t stra
tegi
es, a
nd im
prov
ed
cohe
renc
e of
indi
vidu
al o
rgan
izat
ion
effo
rts.
Impr
oved
col
lect
ion
and
shar
ing
of k
now
ledg
e, to
ols
and
best
pra
ctic
es
Tool
s an
d su
ppor
t for
bui
ldin
g th
e co
mm
itmen
t with
in m
embe
r org
aniz
atio
ns to
ta
ckle
the
chal
leng
es o
f slu
ms
and
urba
n po
verty
. Li
nkin
g gr
ant-f
unde
d te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e w
ith c
apita
l inv
estm
ent f
ollo
w-u
p.
Ulti
mat
e be
nefic
iarie
s:
At th
e lo
cal l
evel
: Th
e pr
iorit
ies
of th
e ur
ban
poor
are
add
ress
ed th
roug
h th
eir d
irect
eng
agem
ent
in th
e fo
rmul
atio
n an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of C
DS
and
city
wid
e up
grad
ing
activ
ities
, as
this
is a
key
crit
eria
for A
llianc
e-fu
nded
act
iviti
es.
Impr
oved
coh
eren
ce o
f dev
elop
men
t ass
ista
nce
lead
ing
to in
crea
sed
impa
ct
and
effic
ienc
y in
redu
cing
urb
an p
over
ty.
Impr
oved
stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ng, m
ovin
g be
yond
sec
tora
l and
pro
ject
app
roac
hes
to c
ityw
ide
and
natio
nwid
e im
pact
s.
At th
e gl
obal
leve
l: C
ities
are
eng
aged
in s
ettin
g po
licy
and
prio
ritie
s fo
r the
Citi
es A
llianc
e as
m
embe
rs o
f the
Citi
es A
llianc
e C
onsu
ltativ
e G
roup
. R
epre
sent
ativ
es o
f the
urb
an p
oor (
NG
Os/
CBO
s), t
he p
rivat
e se
ctor
and
oth
er
civi
l soc
iety
org
aniz
atio
ns a
dvis
e on
Citi
es A
llianc
e po
licy
and
on re
gion
al
stra
tegi
es a
nd a
ppro
ache
s as
mem
bers
of t
he C
ities
Allia
nce
Polic
y Ad
viso
ry
Boar
d.
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up to
Ass
ist t
he P
oore
st T
he u
ltim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
of C
GAP
are
the
poor
, inc
ludi
ng
mic
ro-e
ntre
pren
eurs
and
ver
y po
or h
ouse
hold
s, w
ho la
ck
acce
ss to
form
al c
redi
t and
sav
ings
ser
vice
s. T
he v
ast
maj
ority
of t
hese
ulti
mat
e be
nefic
iarie
s ar
e po
or w
omen
. As
a co
ndui
t to
the
poor
, loc
al m
icro
finan
ce in
stitu
tions
, whi
ch
dire
ctly
pro
vide
fina
ncia
l ser
vice
s to
the
poor
at t
he
com
mun
ity le
vel,
are
the
inte
rmed
iate
ben
efic
iarie
s. C
GAP
m
embe
r don
ors
and
gove
rnm
ents
als
o be
nefit
from
act
iviti
es
aim
ed a
t im
prov
ing
dono
r mic
rofin
ance
pra
ctic
es a
nd th
e po
licy
envi
ronm
ent f
or m
icro
finan
ce.
The
prin
cipa
l int
ende
d be
nefit
that
ulti
mat
e be
nefic
iarie
s re
ceiv
e fro
m C
GAP
’s
activ
ities
is a
cces
s to
cre
dit,
savi
ngs,
and
oth
er fi
nanc
ial s
ervi
ces
that
resp
ond
to th
eir s
peci
fic n
eeds
. The
se fi
nanc
ial s
ervi
ces
enab
le th
e po
or to
incr
ease
th
eir i
ncom
e, b
uild
thei
r bus
ines
ses,
redu
ce th
eir e
cono
mic
vul
nera
bilit
y, a
nd
impr
ove
the
wel
l-bei
ng o
f the
ir fa
milie
s in
the
proc
ess.
Thr
ough
this
acc
ess
to
finan
cial
ser
vice
s, p
oor p
eopl
e, e
spec
ially
wom
en, b
ecom
e m
ore
conf
iden
t and
as
serti
ve a
nd h
ave
mor
e co
ntro
l of t
heir
lives
. The
y ar
e be
tter a
ble
to a
cces
s pu
blic
ser
vice
s an
d be
tter a
ble
to n
egot
iate
and
eve
n co
nfro
nt th
e st
ruct
ures
of
patri
arch
y an
d in
equi
ty th
at tr
aditi
onal
ly h
ave
kept
them
poo
r.
Annex J 76
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Glo
bal C
orpo
rate
Gov
erna
nce
Foru
m
The
inte
rmed
iate
ben
efic
iarie
s of
the
Foru
m’s
wor
k ar
e th
e le
ader
s of
pub
lic a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
refo
rm in
itiat
ives
in
deve
lopi
ng c
ount
ries.
The
ulti
mat
e be
nefic
iarie
s of
the
prog
ram
are
the
loca
l com
mun
ities
who
will
gain
from
the
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent w
hich
an
impr
oved
inve
stm
ent
clim
ate
can
brin
g.
Uni
nten
ded
bene
fits
cann
ot b
e id
entif
ied
at th
is e
arly
sta
ge o
f the
pro
gram
. The
in
tend
ed b
enef
its a
re s
et o
ut in
the
Foru
m’s
Cha
rter,
whi
ch is
a c
ontri
butio
n to
pr
omot
ing
the
priv
ate
sect
or a
s an
eng
ine
of g
row
th, r
educ
ing
vuln
erab
ility
to
finan
cial
cris
is, p
rovi
ding
ince
ntiv
es fo
r cor
pora
tions
to in
vest
and
per
form
ef
ficie
ntly
, in
a so
cial
ly re
spon
sibl
e m
anne
r.
Ove
r the
med
ium
term
this
will
incl
ude
a ra
nge
of b
enef
its fr
om e
mpl
oym
ent
linke
d to
gro
wth
, bet
ter p
rote
cted
inve
stm
ent r
etur
ns fo
r loc
al s
avin
gs, s
uch
as
pens
ion
fund
s, re
duct
ions
in c
ost o
f cap
ital f
or b
usin
esse
s an
d re
duct
ion
in
risks
and
opp
ortu
nity
cos
t fro
m in
effic
ient
and
inef
fect
ive
corp
orat
e bo
ards
, op
erat
ing
unde
r wea
k re
gula
tion
and
poor
enf
orce
men
t. Th
e Fo
rum
will
be s
uppo
rting
a re
sear
ch p
rogr
am w
hich
will
be d
esig
ned
to
deve
lop
the
empi
rical
ana
lysi
s to
test
thes
e as
sum
ptio
ns, a
nd a
lso
to re
fine
polic
y ad
vice
in re
form
.
Info
rmat
ion
for D
evel
opm
ent P
rogr
am
(info
Dev
) Pe
ople
are
the
ultim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
of in
foD
ev a
ctiv
ities
. In
the
proc
ess
priv
ate
and
publ
ic o
rgan
izat
ions
als
o be
nefit
s th
roug
h an
incr
ease
in th
eir c
apac
ity to
util
ize
ICT.
Bene
ficia
ries
have
incr
ease
d ac
cess
to c
ritic
al in
form
atio
n di
rect
ly re
late
d to
th
eir w
ell b
eing
(edu
catio
n, h
ealth
, gov
ernm
ent,
envi
ronm
enta
l man
agem
ent,
etc.
). Th
ey a
lso
dire
ctly
ben
efit
from
the
proj
ect b
y in
crea
sing
thei
r cap
acity
to
use
ICT
tool
s. In
foD
ev p
roje
cts
also
hav
e po
sitiv
e un
inte
nded
con
sequ
ence
s su
ch a
s th
e de
velo
pmen
t and
dis
sem
inat
ion
of lo
cal c
ultu
ral c
onte
nt.
Prov
entio
n C
onso
rtium
Th
e ul
timat
e be
nefic
iarie
s of
Pro
Vent
ion
activ
ities
are
at r
isk
deve
lopi
ng c
ount
ries,
par
ticul
arly
thei
r poo
r inh
abita
nts
who
ar
e us
ually
con
cent
rate
d in
the
mos
t vul
nera
ble
area
s. In
the
inte
rmed
iate
term
, the
ben
efic
iarie
s in
clud
e al
l par
tner
s in
volv
ed, p
artic
ular
ly th
e W
orld
Ban
k, o
ther
mul
tilat
eral
ba
nks
and
deve
lopm
ent o
rgan
izat
ions
that
are
inve
stin
g in
th
e so
cial
and
eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent o
f our
clie
nt c
ount
ries.
Th
e ai
m o
f Pro
Vent
ion
is to
pro
vide
tool
s an
d m
etho
dolo
gies
to
enh
ance
dev
elop
men
t effo
rts a
nd m
ake
them
trul
y su
stai
nabl
e.
ProV
entio
n en
able
s st
akeh
olde
rs to
wor
k as
a n
etw
ork
on a
glo
bal b
asis
, to
do
mor
e co
llect
ivel
y th
an th
ey c
an d
o in
divi
dual
ly o
r eve
n in
sho
rt-te
rm
partn
ersh
ips
that
may
em
erge
on
a pr
ojec
t-by-
proj
ect b
asis
. It h
as p
rove
n to
be
an e
ffect
ive
mec
hani
sm to
mob
ilize
and
leve
rage
s re
sour
ces
for t
he b
enef
it of
de
velo
ping
cou
ntrie
s. T
he c
oord
inat
ion
of th
e ac
tiviti
es s
erve
s to
avo
id
unne
cess
ary
dupl
icat
ion
of e
fforts
. U
ltim
atel
y, th
e be
nefic
iarie
s in
the
clie
nt c
ount
ries
will
bene
fit fr
om s
trong
er,
mor
e re
silie
nt d
evel
opm
ent i
nves
tmen
ts; i
mpr
oved
acc
ess
to d
isas
ter r
isk
redu
ctio
n st
rate
gies
, ins
uran
ce a
nd s
afet
y ne
ts; e
nhan
ced
inst
itutio
nal c
apac
ity
for r
isk
iden
tific
atio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t
77 Annex J
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Publ
ic-P
rivat
e In
frast
ruct
ure
Advi
sory
Fa
cilit
y Th
e in
tend
ed u
ltim
ate
bene
ficia
ries
of P
PIAF
’s a
ctiv
ities
are
ci
tizen
s of
dev
elop
ing
coun
tries
, par
ticul
arly
the
poor
est,
who
ben
efit
from
impr
oved
acc
ess
to m
ore
relia
ble
infra
stru
ctur
e se
rvic
es.
Inte
rmed
iate
ben
efic
iarie
s in
clud
e re
cipi
ent e
cono
mie
s as
a
who
le, w
ith P
PIAF
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce
help
ing
to in
crea
se
the
effic
ienc
y of
key
sec
tors
, sup
porti
ng p
rivat
e in
vest
men
t, an
d fre
eing
up
publ
ic re
sour
ces
for o
ther
soc
ial p
urpo
ses.
Th
e W
orld
Ban
k G
roup
is a
lso
an in
term
edia
te b
enef
icia
ry
sinc
e PP
IAF
supp
orts
and
com
plem
ents
the
Bank
’s
prog
ram
s, in
clud
ing
thro
ugh
bette
r don
or c
oord
inat
ion.
O
ther
par
ticip
atin
g do
nors
als
o be
nefit
thro
ugh
impr
oved
co
ordi
natio
n of
thei
r pro
gram
s an
d ac
tiviti
es in
this
are
a, a
nd
by g
aini
ng a
cces
s to
glo
bal b
est p
ract
ices
in th
e de
sign
of
such
inte
rven
tions
. And
, the
priv
ate
sect
or, b
oth
loca
lly a
nd
inte
rnat
iona
lly, b
enef
its th
roug
h ex
pand
ed b
usin
ess
oppo
rtuni
ties.
PPIA
F’s
inte
rven
tions
are
dire
cted
to a
chie
ving
the
follo
win
g be
nefit
s fo
r clie
nt
gove
rnm
ents
: Im
prov
e th
e co
vera
ge, q
ualit
y an
d ef
ficie
ncy
of w
ater
, pow
er, t
rans
port
and
tele
com
ser
vice
s, p
artic
ular
ly to
the
poor
est w
ith c
onse
quen
tial b
enef
its fo
r the
br
oade
r eco
nom
y an
d th
e de
liver
y of
spe
cific
ser
vice
s in
clud
ing
heal
th a
nd
educ
atio
n.
Red
uce
the
fisca
l and
man
ager
ial b
urde
n on
gov
ernm
ents
. Ex
pand
the
flow
of p
rivat
e in
vest
men
t (in
clud
ing
FDI).
PP
IAF
seek
s to
ach
ieve
thes
e re
sults
in a
way
that
hel
ps: c
onne
ct lo
cal p
olic
y m
aker
s w
ith le
sson
s of
inte
rnat
iona
l bes
t pra
ctic
es in
a fa
st m
ovin
g ar
ea; b
uild
co
nsen
sus
for o
ften
polit
ical
ly s
ensi
tive
refo
rms;
and
sup
port
loca
l cap
acity
bu
ildin
g.
Addi
tiona
l ben
efits
flow
bec
ause
PPI
AF h
as b
een
desi
gned
to re
spon
d ve
ry
quic
kly
to u
rgen
t req
uest
s fo
r ass
ista
nce.
Don
or re
sour
ces
are
also
stru
ctur
ed
to re
duce
any
pot
entia
l sus
pici
on o
f con
flict
ing
com
mer
cial
or o
ther
inte
rest
s.
PPIA
F al
so y
ield
s im
porta
nt b
enef
its fo
r par
ticip
atin
g do
nors
: M
obiliz
e an
d le
vera
ge re
sour
ces.
Ex
ploi
t the
exp
ertis
e an
d ec
onom
ies
of s
cale
and
sco
pe a
vaila
ble
from
an
inte
grat
ed, m
ulti-
dono
r wor
k pr
ogra
m.
Prom
ote
the
exch
ange
of l
esso
ns o
f exp
erie
nce
betw
een
sect
ors,
regi
ons
and
dono
rs.
Faci
litat
e co
ordi
natio
n be
twee
n bi
late
ral a
nd m
ultil
ater
al p
rogr
ams
addr
essi
ng
the
sam
e co
ncer
ns.
Sola
r Dev
elop
men
t Gro
up
Imm
edia
te: S
MEs
in th
e ru
ral a
reas
of d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es
Ulti
mat
e: In
divi
dual
s, h
ouse
hold
s an
d en
terp
rises
nee
ding
ac
cess
to s
mal
l am
ount
s of
ele
ctric
ity.
Acce
ss to
mod
ern
ener
gy s
ervi
ces
and
thus
to li
ghtin
g, m
otiv
e po
wer
etc
.
Col
labo
rativ
e G
roup
for A
rtisa
nal a
nd
Smal
l Sal
e M
inin
g In
term
edia
te: m
ulti-
late
ral a
nd b
i-lat
eral
aid
age
ncie
s; N
GO
s;
sect
or o
rgan
izat
ions
(int
erna
tiona
l and
nat
iona
l); n
atio
nal
and
loca
l gov
ernm
ents
. U
ltim
ate:
sm
all-s
cale
min
ing
com
mun
ities
; com
mun
ities
liv
ing
in o
r clo
se to
are
as o
f ASM
.
Miti
gate
or e
limin
ate
the
nega
tive
envi
ronm
enta
l, so
cial
and
cul
tura
l effe
cts
of
artis
anal
and
sm
all-s
cale
min
ing
on a
ffect
ed c
omm
uniti
es;
Red
uce
the
occu
patio
nal h
ealth
and
saf
ety
risks
to th
e m
iner
s;
Impr
ove
the
polic
y en
viro
nmen
t and
inst
itutio
nal a
rrang
emen
ts g
over
ning
sm
all-
scal
e m
inin
g;
Incr
ease
the
prod
uctiv
ity a
nd im
prov
e th
e liv
elih
oods
of m
iner
s.
Alte
rnat
ive
livel
ihoo
ds th
roug
h ef
fect
ive
inte
grat
ed u
se o
f the
ir na
tura
l res
ourc
e ca
pita
l by
cons
erva
tion
of b
iodi
vers
ity in
affe
cted
are
as
Annex J 78
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Dig
ital O
ppor
tuni
ty T
ask
(DO
T) F
orce
Pe
ople
and
loca
l com
mun
ities
, ent
erpr
ises
(esp
ecia
lly
SMEs
) and
gov
ernm
ents
sho
uld
all b
enef
it si
gnifi
cant
ly fr
om
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Gen
oa A
ctio
n Pl
an.
Inte
nded
: be
tter c
onne
ctiv
ity a
nd a
cces
s to
the
basi
c to
ols
of a
n in
form
atio
n-in
tens
ive
soci
ety;
M
ostly
uni
nten
ded
: hig
her l
evel
of m
utua
l und
erst
andi
ng a
t the
inte
rnat
iona
l le
vel (
incl
udin
g am
ong
vario
us c
ompo
nent
s of
civ
il so
ciet
y); g
reat
er s
uppo
rt fo
r th
e pr
oces
s of
glo
baliz
atio
n, th
e ro
les
of g
over
nmen
ts a
nd th
ose
of m
ultil
ater
al
orga
niza
tions
.
Ener
gy S
ecto
r Man
agem
ent A
ssis
tanc
e Th
e in
term
edia
te b
enef
icia
ries
com
e in
man
y sh
apes
and
si
zes:
gov
ernm
ent p
olic
y m
aker
s an
d pl
anne
rs, u
tility
of
ficia
ls, a
dmin
istra
tors
in b
ilate
ral a
id p
rogr
ams,
con
sulta
nts
and
cons
ultin
g fir
ms,
aca
dem
ics,
and
Wor
ld B
ank
staf
f. Th
e ul
timat
e be
nefic
iarie
s ar
e pr
imar
ily p
oor e
nerg
y co
nsum
ers
in d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es w
ho c
onsu
me
dirty
ene
rgy
inef
ficie
ntly
and
spe
nd u
p to
20%
of t
heir
inco
me
on m
eetin
g th
eir e
nerg
y ne
eds
– if
they
hav
e ac
cess
to m
oder
n en
ergy
at
all.
Prim
arily
kno
wle
dge
that
hel
ps d
efin
e ch
oice
s. T
he b
enef
icia
ries
rece
ive
qual
ity, u
nbia
sed
and
rele
vant
adv
ice
base
d on
em
ergi
ng g
loba
l bes
t pra
ctic
e on
wha
t tec
hnic
al, e
cono
mic
and
inst
itutio
nal o
ptio
ns a
re b
est a
ble
to m
eet t
heir
ener
gy n
eeds
whi
le m
inim
izin
g im
pact
s on
the
natu
ral/s
ocia
l env
ironm
ent a
nd
on p
ublic
fina
ncia
l res
ourc
es.
Fore
ign
Inve
stm
ent A
dvis
ory
Serv
ice
Prog
ram
C
lient
s to
the
FIAS
Pro
gram
are
gov
ernm
ents
, who
are
the
reci
pien
ts o
f FIA
S’s
advi
ce. I
nter
med
iate
ben
efic
iary
is th
e pr
ivat
e se
ctor
, dom
estic
and
fore
ign.
Ulti
mat
e be
nefic
iarie
s ar
e th
e pe
ople
of t
he c
ount
ries
we
wor
k in
, thr
ough
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
priv
ate
sect
or a
nd it
s co
ntrib
utio
n to
de
velo
pmen
t and
pov
erty
alle
viat
ion.
Clie
nt g
over
nmen
ts re
ceiv
e re
com
men
datio
ns o
n ho
w to
impr
ove
the
inve
stm
ent c
limat
e in
thei
r cou
ntry
. Rec
omm
enda
tions
may
add
ress
pol
icy
issu
es, t
he le
gal a
nd re
gula
tory
fram
ewor
k fo
r PSD
, and
inst
itutio
nal c
apac
ity
build
ing.
The
impl
emen
ting
of s
uch
reco
mm
enda
tions
by
gove
rnm
ents
is li
kely
co
ntrib
ute
to th
e st
imul
atio
n of
the
econ
omy.
The
pro
cess
ado
pted
by
FIAS
in
cond
uctin
g its
adv
isor
y w
ork,
incl
udin
g pr
esen
ting
its fi
ndin
gs a
nd
reco
mm
enda
tions
, has
led
to th
e en
cour
agem
ent o
f a d
ialo
gue
betw
een
the
priv
ate
sect
or a
nd g
over
nmen
ts.
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
Prog
ram
Th
e ul
timat
e be
nefic
iarie
s of
our
act
iviti
es a
re p
oor p
eopl
e liv
ing
in d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es a
nd la
ckin
g ad
equa
te a
cces
s to
saf
e an
d af
ford
able
wat
er a
nd s
anita
tion
serv
ices
.
Incr
ease
d ac
cess
to s
afe
wat
er a
nd s
anita
tion
is th
e pr
imar
y be
nefit
we
deliv
er,
but t
his
is n
ot a
chie
ved
thro
ugh
dire
ct in
vest
men
ts a
nd c
onst
ruct
ion,
rath
er
thro
ugh
supp
ort a
nd d
evel
opm
ent o
f sui
tabl
e le
gal,
regu
lato
ry, p
olic
y an
d im
plem
enta
tion
prac
tices
in c
lient
cou
ntrie
s. IN
add
ition
our
inte
rmed
iate
(and
so
me
of o
ur u
ltim
ate)
clie
nts
also
gai
n ac
cess
to a
n in
tern
atio
nal b
ody
of
expe
rienc
e on
sec
tor r
efor
m a
nd d
evel
opm
ent i
ssue
s . T
his
bene
fit fl
ows
both
w
ays;
may
of o
ur c
lient
s ha
ve b
ecom
e st
rong
adv
ocat
es fo
r sec
tor r
efor
m a
nd
new
idea
s bo
th in
thei
r ow
n co
untri
es a
nd in
a w
ider
inte
rnat
iona
l are
na.
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent L
earn
ing
Net
wor
k D
ecis
ion
mak
ers
acro
ss th
e de
velo
ping
wor
ld w
ho w
ill ha
ve
inex
pens
ive
and
regu
lar a
cces
s to
a g
loba
l net
wor
k of
pee
rs,
expe
rts a
nd p
ract
ition
ers
with
who
m th
ey m
ay s
hare
idea
s an
d ex
perie
nce
that
will
help
them
in th
eir w
ork.
Prov
isio
n of
cos
t-effe
ctiv
e in
tera
ctiv
e le
arni
ng a
ctiv
ities
thro
ugho
ut th
e de
velo
ping
wor
ld, b
y re
achi
ng a
cros
s ge
ogra
phic
bor
ders
, tim
e zo
nes,
and
la
ngua
ge b
arrie
rs.
Impr
oved
dec
isio
n m
akin
g th
roug
h in
tera
ctiv
e le
arni
ng th
at is
bas
ed o
n re
al-li
fe
expe
rienc
e sh
ared
by
expe
rts, p
ract
ition
ers,
and
dec
isio
n-m
aker
s.
Faci
litat
ed re
gula
r exc
hang
es a
mon
g pr
actit
ione
rs a
nd e
xper
ts a
cros
s co
untri
es
and
regi
ons,
in a
way
hith
erto
rest
ricte
d by
the
need
for e
xten
sive
trav
el a
nd
cost
s.
Del
iver
y of
cut
ting-
edge
kno
wle
dge
to th
e de
velo
pmen
t com
mun
ity o
n cu
rrent
is
sues
, in
real
tim
e, th
roug
h vi
rtual
face
-to-fa
ce e
vent
s an
d ac
tiviti
es
79 Annex J
Prog
ram
Nam
e In
tend
ed b
enef
icia
ries
(inte
rmed
iate
and
ulti
mat
e)
Prin
cipa
l ben
efits
(int
ende
d an
d un
inte
nded
).
Glo
bal K
now
ledg
e Pa
rtner
ship
G
iven
the
mem
bers
hip
of th
e G
KP, t
he b
enef
icia
ries
are
thos
e st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd p
ract
ition
ers
in k
now
ledg
e fo
r de
velo
pmen
t.
GKP
mem
bers
bui
ld th
eir o
wn
and
othe
rs’ c
apac
ity to
effe
ctiv
ely
deve
lop,
sha
re
and
appl
y kn
owle
dge,
incl
udin
g th
e ca
paci
ty to
dev
elop
app
ropr
iate
pol
icy
and
regu
lato
ry fr
amew
orks
for k
now
ledg
e so
ciet
ies.
Mem
bers
reac
h a
broa
d au
dien
ce th
roug
h m
ulti-
dire
ctio
nal i
nfor
mat
ion
exch
ange
act
iviti
es a
nd b
uild
co
mm
uniti
es o
f pra
ctic
e on
spe
cific
kno
wle
dge
for d
evel
opm
ent i
ssue
s. A
s a
Partn
ersh
ip, G
KP p
lays
an
advo
cacy
role
on
beha
lf of
its
mem
bers
, in
inte
rnat
iona
l and
mul
ti-la
tera
l by
brin
ging
the
voic
es o
f its
div
erse
mem
bers
hip
to th
e di
scus
sion
on
know
ledg
e fo
r dev
elop
men
t and
brid
ging
the
digi
tal d
ivid
e.
Annex J 80
81 Annex K
Annex K. Risk Assessment and Approval Process for Private Sector Partnerships The Business Partnership and Outreach Group in the Private Sector Development and Infrastructure Vice-Presidency provided advice to the World Bank Group with respect to engaging in partnerships with private sector entities at the global, regional, and national levels. The Group had produced two brochures on risks and risk management:
• Business Partnership: Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Management, Briefing Note No. 4, November 2000
• Partnerships with the Private Sector: Assessment and Approval, August 2001. The Bank’s Management has now endorsed, for all new private sector partnerships, the risk assessment and approval process that is contained in the August 2001 brochure and integrated this into the Partnership Approval and Tracking System (PATS) along with three other business processes—the initiating concept note for seeking MD approval, the DGF application process, and the initiating brief for trust funds. The PSI Network provides this assessment and approval process for new private sector partnerships for the Bank as a whole, like the ESSD Network coordinates the implementation of the Safeguards Policy for the Bank.
The August 2001 brochure identifies four major risks to the Bank of engaging in partnerships with the private sector:
• Reputational risks: Selecting an inappropriate private sector partner or partnership activity • Conflict of interest risks: Entailing a conflict of interest between the private partner’s
involvement in upstream policy advisory or project/program design work and subsequent intention to be involved in linked downstream work, be it in the form of further consultant services or provision of goods and services
• Unfair advantage risks: Conferring unfair advantage on a single company (e.g. co-hosting a conference and then allowing them to use the Bank’s name in a manner that implies an endorsement of, or preference for, the company’s products or services).
• Governance risks: Designing the partnership’s governance structure or processes in a way which is unlikely to deliver the desired outcomes, or which may do so with prohibitively high transactions costs
The November 2000 brochure had identified two other risks associated with private sector partnerships that were included in OED’s survey of the task managers of global programs:
• Dilution of World Bank Group’s convening power: A reduction in external entities’ willingness to participate in activities convened by Bank Group staff
• Diverting World Bank Group’s resources to non-priority areas: The additional transactions costs of the partnership outweigh the additional outcomes generated by the partnership for countries/communities
The August 2001 represents a second iteration of the assessment and approval process for private sector partnerships in terms of what is practical. Drawing upon their experience since November 2000, the Business Partnership Group has concluded that it was impractical to assess the latter two risks in a rigorous way.
Annex L 82
Annex L. DGF Governance and Management Framework DGF was established by the Board in August 1997 to consolidate the management of existing arrangements for grant making under a single umbrella and to ensure that the use of Bank grant resources is closely aligned with sector and Bank-wide priorities. To enable Bank to prioritize the allocations, grants from the IBRD administrative budget are normally channeled through the DGF. Only in special cases, like the Development Marketplace or the Research Support Budget, other parts of the administrative budget extend grants. DGF grants, according to OP 8.45, are to be used only to support activities that meet the Bank’s overall grant-making objectives (listed below) and that are consistent with Bank’s institutional and sector priorities. DGF grants must also substantially meet the eight DGF eligibility criteria that are listed below.
1. Objectives of Grant Making
According to OP 8.45 grants are an integral part of the Bank’s development work and an important complement to its lending and advisory services. The Bank’s main objectives in extending grants are:
• To encourage innovation • Catalyze partnerships • Broaden the scope of Bank services.
2. DGF Eligibility Criteria
The OP 8.45 clarifies the framework for Bank grant making through the Development Grant Facility. It enlists the following Board-approved eligibility criteria for DGF to achieve the objectives of grant-supported activities:
• The program contributes to furthering the Bank’s development and resource mobilization objectives in fields basic to its operations, but it does not compete with or substitute for regular Bank instruments.
• The Bank has a distinct comparative advantage in being associated with the grant program; it does not replicate the role of other donors.
• The program encompasses multi-country benefits or activities that it would not be appropriate to undertake at the country level.
• The Bank’s presence provides significant leverage for generating financial support from other donors. Any single grant to a recipient should generally not exceed 15 percent of expected funding over the life of Bank funding to a given program, or over the rolling 3-year plan period, whichever is shorter.
• The grant is normally given to an institution with a record of achievement in the program area and financial probity.
• The management of the recipient institution has an arm’s length relationship with the Bank’s regular programs.
• Grant programs are expected to incorporate an explicit disengagement strategy. • Programs and activities financed should promote and reinforce partnerships with key
development partners. 3. DGF Governance and Management
Under the Bank’s grant making governance structure, a prioritization process has been put in place consisting of the Sector Boards, Bank networks, the DGF Council and the Bank’s management
83 Annex L
committee. Each year the Development Grant Facility (DGF) Council and Secretariat are responsible in setting the parameters and a timetable for receiving and reviewing DGF grant applications for the following fiscal year. Each proposed DGF program is sponsored by a Bank unit and is under the direct responsibility of an individual Bank program manager. The program manager is responsible for preparing the grant application, having it cleared with the manager of the sponsoring Bank unit and then submitting it to the relevant Sector Board head. The Sector Board is responsible for reviewing the proposals received, endorsing them as appropriate, and ranking them in terms of priority for funding against the sector strategies. The Network Council is responsible for reviewing the Sector Board submission and adjusting them appropriately to reflect the Network priorities before forwarding the submissions to the DGF Secretariat for consideration by the DGF Council.
The DGF Council25 is responsible for reviewing programs from an institutional perspective and ensuring that these comply with DGF eligibility criteria, objectives in grant making and Bank wide priorities for regional and global initiatives. The DGF Council may recommend shifts across networks to reflect institution-wide priorities. The DGF Council is also responsible for recommending allocations to senior Bank management for consideration by the Bank’s Board under annual DGF budgets. In the partnership oversight process, the Managing Directors are expected to review all new major partnership initiatives undertaken within the Bank. The Bank’s Board is responsible in providing the overall strategic direction to the DGF and approving the DGF budget each year.
The DGF prioritization process consists of the following reviews and approvals:
• Initial Managing Directors Review – MDs’ approval of new global programs at the early conceptual stage – Authorizes the responsible VPU to mobilize resources for the program, including
potentially from the DGF • Application Process
– Sponsoring Bank staff prepares application – Most proposals are to be implemented by outside agencies
• Sector Board Review – Vets against quality – Ranks against sector priorities
• Network Clearance – Adjusts Sector Board submissions to reflect Network priorities
• DGF Endorsement – DGF Council reviews proposals against:
o DGF criteria o Objectives in grant-making and o Bank-wide priorities for global and regional initiatives
– Proposes grant allocations within constraint of DGF budget envelope • Senior Management Recommendation
– Recommends annual DGF budget to Board • Board Approval
– Board approves budget and sets overall policy direction – Board has delegated limited authority to Management to reallocate funds
25. The DGF Council consists of representatives from all Bank Networks, three Regions (on a rotating basis), Strategy and Resource Management, Resource Mobilization and Cofinancing, and the Legal Department.
Annex L 84
4. Process of Independent Evaluation, Financial Reporting and Grant Completion Reports
Independent Evaluations. All DGF programs receiving over US$300,000 annually from the DGF are required to have an arrangement for regular and independent evaluations. According to BP 8.45, the program manager, besides being responsible for supervision of implementation and obtaining and reviewing all relevant global program reports is also responsible for ensuring that an appropriate level of independent evaluation is provided.
Financial Reporting. The task manager of the Bank sponsoring unit normally makes disbursement requests to the DGF Secretariat on behalf of the recipient. The DGF grants are normally executed by recipients that have a record of achievement and demonstrated financial probity.26 According to BP 8.45, the “grant recipients are required to exercise the same care in the administration of the grant as they exercise in the administration of their own funds, having due regard to economy, efficiency, and the need to uphold the highest standards of integrity, including the prevention of fraud and corruption, in the administration of public funds”.
Furthermore, the recipient organization is responsible for implementing the activities of the program and preparing all reports specified in the Grant Letter of Agreement, including an annual statement of account showing the use of grant funds, audited annual financial statements, and a report 26. As outlined in BP8.45, in some special cases, the DGF may disburse funds to a program housed within the Bank (i.e. without a Grant Letter of Agreement) if the program (a) has its own secretariat in the Bank funded directly by the DGF, or (b) is responsible for making numerous subgrants and obtaining clearance of Grant Letters of Agreement from LEG (examples include the Institutional Development Fund, Post-Conflict Fund, InfoDev, and Small Grants Program); or (c) the program is covered by a multilateral agreement. In a few exceptional cases approved by the Executive Directors (e.g., Institutional Development Fund, Post-Conflict Fund), grants may be disbursed into trust funds administered by the Bank.
DGF - Governance StructureBOARD
DGF COUNCIL a/
BANK SPONSORING UNIT
Grant funded activities
SponsorsSupervisesEvaluates
Reviews & Endorses
Implements
Approves
Grant Recipients
SECTOR BOARD /NETWORK COUNCIL Vets & Prioritizes
a/ The DGF Council currently consists of representatives from five Networks, regions, LEG, SRM, and RMC. It is chaired by the Vice President of RMC and is supported by a small DGF Secretariat
SENIOR MANAGEMENT Recommends
85 Annex L
summarizing activities and results. The Bank task manager and the program manager are responsible for supervising implementation and obtaining and reviewing all relevant program reports, including timely financial reporting and appropriate use of DGF funds by grant recipients. For external Bank global programs, the DGF requires that the task manager forward an audited financial statement along with a Progress Report on the program for review with the annual application for funding.
The Grant Completion Report of the global program is expected to describe the extent to which program objectives were met and activities completed, assessing the program’s development impact, identifying problems in the program’s execution, and providing lessons learned.27 Overall, these reports are expected to be one way for the Bank management and the Board to determine the effectiveness of the use of grant funds and the “lessons learnt” from these programs to further refine the budget allocation and prioritization process.
According to the BP 8.45, the program manager is responsible, if the DGF’s funding for the program is ending, for preparing a Grant Completion Report within six months after the closing date of the final Grant Letter of Agreement, clearing it with the manager of the Bank sponsoring unit, and forwarding it to the DGF Secretariat. Even for external global programs, the program manager, by signing the Letter of Grant Agreement, agrees to submitting to the Bank, a report “summarizing the activities financed by the Grant and assessing the results achieved by the activities compared to their objectives” within six months from the end of the grant period. The DGF Secretariat is responsible for reviewing and reporting on the Grant Completion Reports in the DGF’s Annual Review submission to the Board.
27. A model grant completion report is available to the Bank staff. The Grant Completion Report also needs to include the audited financial statements of the program and any independent or recipient-prepared evaluation reports
Annex M 86
Annex M. Trust Fund Governance and Management Framework
Purpose of Trust Funds
A Trust Fund (TF) is a financial and administrative arrangement between the Bank and an external donor under which the donor entrusts funds to the Bank to finance a specific development-related activity. Trust funds are of several types (Box M.1) including those for Global and Regional Programs (See Framework below). The Bank’s operational policies and procedures for trust funds are spelled out in OP 14.40 and BP 14.40 (issued in February 1997), which are reviewed from time to time to ensure their continued effectiveness in contributing to the Bank’s development objectives. A review of the policies is currently in progress and the OP may be revised soon. By participating in the trust fund, the Bank aims:
• to assist its member countries by increasing flow of resources for development; and • to support its own operational and research programs.
The Bank’s policy requirements in accepting administration of a trust fund, as laid down in OP 14.40, are:
• The Bank accepts only trust funds that support activities not traditionally financed under the Bank’s administrative budget and those do not create a conflict of interest.
• Activities under trust funds are part of a unit’s work program and complement, expand and enhance Bank policies and programs, including non-lending services.
• The Bank accepts only trust funds that it can administer under cost effective arrangements. • The trust funds must be of a minimum size, the amount of which (currently $200,000) is
determined from time to time and provide untied funds, except for Consultant Trust Funds (CTFs), which have some special features.
• As a principle, the Bank advocates open global competition and does not accept tied funds or procurement under trust funds except in some special circumstances e.g. CTFs.
• The Bank may accept a trust fund from the private sector, provided that (a) the Bank retains decision-making authority over the use of funds; (b) the funds advance recipient country interests and Bank’s policy and institutional objectives; and (c) no special advantages or benefits accrue to the donor.
Each trust fund is governed by a TF Administration Agreement between the Bank and the donor. The trust fund financed activity may be executed by the recipient country where the Bank passes on resources to intended beneficiary according to the terms and conditions of a Trust Fund Grant Agreement between the Bank and the recipient. The Bank recovers its costs to manage and administer a trust fund taking into account the direct benefit to the Bank from such funding.28 The Bank exercises the same care in the discharge of its agreed functions under the trust funds as it does in respect to its own affairs.
28. The managing units used to have the prerogative of to waive or negotiate trust funds on a case-by-case basis with the result that the charges varied across different trust funds. This has been eliminated in revised cost recovery arrangement proposed by TFC/RMC on August 16, 2000, whereby a uniform policy has been adopted.
87 Annex M
Box M.1. Types of Trust Funds
Global and regional trust funds: These include the Highly Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Trust Fund, the Global Environment Facility (GEF), and other umbrella thematic trust funds that are implementing international agreements and multilateral initiatives. Most global programs derive their financial support from this type of trust funds. Most are supported by governance or partnership arrangements and have relatively independent management from the Bank.
WBI trust funds: These are multi-year programmatic trust funds supporting programs and activities in 15 thematic areas. Managed by WBI, these only provide trust fund resources to programs such as World Links for Development that have a Bank budget base of support.
Single-donor programmatic trust funds: These trust funds are usually established for agreed-upon thematic or operational priorities and have a vetting mechanism with the Bank to propose priority activities to be funded. The four largest the Japan’s Policy and Human Resources Development (PHRD) fund, the Japan Social Development Fund (JSDF), the Bank-Netherlands Partnership Program (BNPP) and Norway’s Environment and Social Development Fund (NESD).
Consultant trust funds: These funds involve largely tied funds (to consultants associated with the donor country) and relatively small allocations. These can be accessed by any Bank unit (including global programs managed inside the Bank) provided that their use meets the specific conditions associated with the fund.
Single-purpose country-focused and sector/thematic trust funds: These are stand-alone, non-programmatic funds, which finance activities pre-specified by donors in agreement with the Bank.
Trust Fund Governance Structure
The Resource Mobilization and Co-financing Vice Presidency (RMC) serves as the focal point in the Bank for mobilization of external funds and is accountable at the institutional level for relationships with official bilateral agencies and other multilateral development banks and multilateral agencies. It develops trust fund programs in consultation with donors, identifies common development objectives between the Bank and the donor community, negotiates major new programs, advises on restructuring of new trust fund programs and coordinates clearance by central units including Controller’s and Legal. RMC formulates trust fund policies, carries out evaluation and overall reporting and maintains relationships with official agencies and institutional level relationship with multilevel development banks and agencies. It also manages the Development Grant Facility, a vehicle for Bank-funded grants to global and regional programs, some of which also receive external contributions through trust funds. A Partnership Council located in RMC facilitates knowledge sharing and rationalization of contacts with key external partners. Established in May 1999, the Council is composed of a representative sample of Network, Central and Regional VPs and is chaired by an MD. It provides the Board with an overview of trends and issues in partnership. Within the network vice presidencies, co-financing coordinators and funding coordinators, similar to the regional vice presidencies, provide guidance on trust fund management that is network-specific. These coordinating mechanisms at the regional and the network levels are aimed at ensuring that there is no disconnect or mismatch between the functional responsibilities of the two in participating in trust funds and then implementing them. The trust fund managing units in the vice presidencies are responsible for:
• Planning and budgeting trust funds; • Identifying possible sources of financing in consultation with the regional/departmental
cofinancing coordinators and TFC, and obtaining funds
Annex M 88
• Applying internal controls to ensure compliance with OP/BP 14.40 and TFC/donor guidelines;
• Supervision, procurement, disbursement, and external and internal reporting; • Monitoring trust fund portfolio and funds status, ensuring compliance with trust fund
objectives and requirements and monitoring output delivery and quality of outputs; and • Evaluation of trust funds and cooperation with OED and RMC in reviewing the programs.
Trust Fund Reforms – Proposals for Change
The rapidly expanding and diversified trust fund portfolio of the Bank has made it increasingly difficult to achieve the full potential development impact and partnership value of these funds under the existing policies and procedures. Recent reviews and audits of Bank-executed trust funds have indicated a clear need to address the challenges arising from the current complexity and diversity of trust fund arrangements, both by strengthening controls and improving the standard of care of trust funds, and also by undertaking more fundamental structural reforms. The reforms being pursued are discussed below.
Objectives:
• Streamlining business processes for single-purpose (country focused/sector-thematic) Trust Funds.
• Refinement to the existing single-donor programmatic trust funds by simplifying management arrangements and providing additional flexibility to the Bank.
• Structural reorganization in trust fund administration to respond to the needs of a growing trust fund portfolio.
Action Plan
Dialogue between the Bank management and the Board on one hand and between the Bank management and the donors on the other, is currently underway to set strategic directions in the main areas of Mainstreaming the trust funds, Simplifying programmatic trust funds, Administrative Reforms and Risk Management. The actions being considered under institutional reforms discussed below aim at strengthening the Bank’s role as a trustee of the donor funding for GPPs, by improving selectivity, introducing transparency, ensuring cost effectiveness and above all improving it credibility amongst the donor community and the recipients of the GPP benefits. These would also ensure meeting the global objectives of the Bank and leveraging its involvement in the various programs where it is involved by additional donor funding.
Policy Reforms:29
Reviews by the Bank of the single purpose trust funds have shown that:
• Although screening procedures require reference to existing CASs and business plans, the current processes do not facilitate meaningful comparison or prioritization across different proposals coming at different times of the year. Selectivity/Relevance and Efficacy are thus substantial issues.
29. Consultant trust funds (CTF) are not covered in this review.
89 Annex M
• While information on donor funding interests is not widely known to managers and task team leaders in the Bank, the donors also suffer from a lack of systematic information on all funding needs in their areas of interest.
• Identification of activities of potential interests to donors is not well coordinated. • Feedback to the donors during implementation is neither standardized nor closely monitored.
For single purpose trust funds, a proposal to standardize business processes for new contributions, which will be subject to improved vetting and prioritization procedures, is under consideration by the Bank . Existing administration agreements would not be renegotiated and on-going activities would continue to completion.
For programmatic trust funds, the donors allocate funds on a yearly basis, which would be available for specified development priorities, allowing central or sectoral program managers to invite proposals consistent with those priorities. Periodic screening and prioritization then follow by central units and Network/Regional VPUs for donor approval. Although these trust funds have transparent selectivity and adequate monitoring, further refinements are needed to simplify arrangements and provide additional flexibility to the Bank in using these trust funds. The key features of reforms30 to the programmatic trust funds are:
• Multi-annual commitments with annual contributions, tied to an annual consultation process.
• Standardized vetting procedures and schedules to ensure alignment with Bank and donor strategic priorities as well as incorporation in business planning
• Designated focal points • Central administration of the program by RMC • Cost efficiencies.
Institutional Reforms
Bank is also introducing institutional changes for implementing reforms within its trust fund administration.31 A committee including vice presidents and managers of the units responsible for trust funds called the Trust Fund Action Committee (TFAC) would coordinate the progress of the reforms and oversee the implementation of the Trust Fund Action Plan. The management of trust funds is now being organized around four pillars: Strategy and donor relations, trust fund operations, accounting, and quality assurance and compliance (as discussed above).
A Strategy and Donor Relation (TFS) unit in the RMC vice presidency will focus on strategy, partnership and resource mobilization. This unit will develop a strategy for the mobilization of trust fund resources and be responsible for managing donor relations to ensure the strategic alignment of trust funds with Bank’s development agenda and will serve as the key focal point, on behalf of RMC, for the Bank with the donor community on matters of policy, strategy and programs.
A Trust Fund Operations (TFO) department will develop internal policies and business processes for the Bank’s use of trust funds. This department will provide centralized support and training to trust fund users and managers; it will manage the selected programmatic trust fund programs and will also develop risk management strategies for trust funds across the Bank; and it will manage and
30. The proposed reforms would be carried out led by RMCVP and the Trust Fund Action Committee (TFAC) in conjunction with the OVPs. TFAC is chaired at the MD level and consists of the Controller, the Auditor General and senior managers from RMC, OPCS, CRM, LEG and DII.
31. Bank’s Kiosk Announcement Tuesday, February 5, 2002
Annex M 90
analyze trust fund information, provide periodic operational reports and briefings and responses to requests for information on trust fund usage.
A Trust Fund Accounting (ACTTF) unit in the Controllers’ Vice Presidency is responsible for formulating and overseeing trust fund financial, accounting and administrative policies.
In October 2001, Bank constituted a Trust Fund Quality Assurance and Compliance Unit (TQC), which is charged with an annual portfolio review of the Bank’s trust fund activities. The unit will ensure quality control for trust fund operations and will advise senior management on controls, compliance, process, and risk issues related to trust fund operations. The initial findings of the unit are:
• trust fund management needs to be integrated into the overall management and control structure of the Bank, with mandatory training for all those who are involved in trust fund management. (A framework for trust fund learning and certification program has already been prepared by RMC and actions are underway to implement training program for the concerned staff.)
• The issues of lack of accountability and consequences of the mismanagement of trust funds need to be addressed.
• The basic trust fund systems and processes need to be simplified and made user friendly.
A schematic presentation of trust fund reforms is presented in Attachment 1. The on-going GPP review will evaluate the impact of the proposed reforms in the case studies it has undertaken.
91 Annex M
Attachment 1: Trust Fund Reforms—A Schematic
Single-Purpose Trust Funds and Programmatic Trust Funds 1. In support of Country-Focused activities 2. In support of Sector/Thematic activities
Annual Donor Consultation and
Indicative Commitments
National Allocations to: 1. Country Management Units2. Networks/Sector boards
Priority Setting/Vetting based on: 1. CAS/PRSP/CDF by Management and/ or
Other Agreed Governance Arrangements 2. SSPs through Networks and Boards and/or
Other Agreed Governance Arrangements
Prioritized Menu of
Proposals
Submission to donors for
selection/funding, if required
Aligned 1. Country Focused trust funds2. Sector/Thematic trust funds
Annex N 92
Annex N. The GPG Fund At a meeting on April 25, 2001, the Management Committee approved the establishment of a global public goods (GPG) Fund of $7.5 million for FY02 to provide additional incentives for work, primarily at the regional and country levels, on the five GPG priority areas defined in the Strategic Directions Paper.
At a subsequent meeting on July 25, 2001, the Management Committee approved 9 out of 15 proposals received according to the following criteria:
• Alignment of the proposal to GPG priorities (and only in exceptional cases) to Corporate Advocacy priorities.
• Designed truly as an incentive to regional and country program action in the specified GPG area, with clearly stated objectives, deliverables, and monitorable indicators
• Strong links to front-line work in Regions • Substantial commitment from Regions and Networks to match GPG Fund resources from
their own budgets • No presumption of continued funding in FY03, and therefore sufficient value added and
demonstration effect to justify corporate support even in the absence of continued funding for FY03.
The table below presents the nine successful proposals, project objectives and key deliverables, amounts requested and approved, and the reasons and conditions for approval. All but one of the successful proposals was a GPG priority, while the other—on mainstreaming gender consideration into ESW, lending, PRSPs, and CASs—was a Corporate Advocacy priority. All but one of the successful proposals is being managed by the network VPs. The six proposals that were not approved for GPG funding include: (1) ICT for Education (request for $836,000); (2) Trade and Rural Development ($900,000); (3) Social Protection SSP Implementation ($775,000); (4) Global Fund for Participation of the Poor ($1 million); (5) Social Development Strategy ($499,000); and (6) Operational Policy Harmonization among International Agencies ($285,000).
The GPG Fund is not generally intended to be an additional source of funds for global programs, since there is no requirement that resources provided by the GPG Fund be used for partnerships activities, whether global programs or institutional partnerships. Three out of the nine initiatives funded by the GPG Fund in FY02 were for global programs, and for three new programs in every case—the Program on Forests (PROFOR II), the Integrated Framework for Trade, and a Natural Gas Flaring Reduction Initiative. Rather the GPG Fund is intended to provide additional resources primarily for the Bank’s networks to mainstream global concerns into regional and country operations.
Nor does GPG funding substitute for DGF funding, since DGF grants are generally intended for partnership activities with shared governance arrangements that are managed at arm’s length from the Bank. GPG funding, on the other hand, can be utilized for Bank staff time and travel costs.
Tab
le. G
loba
l Pub
lic G
oods
Fun
d: A
lloca
tions
for
FY02
93 Annex N
Netw
ork/
Se
ctor
Pr
ojec
t Obj
ectiv
e Ke
y D
eliv
erab
les
Amou
nt
requ
este
d ($
thou
sand
)
Leve
r-ag
e
ratio
/1
Amou
nt
appr
oved
($
thou
sand
) Re
ason
s an
d C
ondi
tions
for A
ppro
val
ESSD
En
viro
nmen
t En
viro
nmen
tal m
ains
tream
ing
in
coun
try E
SW, l
endi
ng a
nd P
RSP
s;
Stra
tegi
c En
viro
nmen
tal A
sses
smen
ts
in k
ey s
ecto
rs.
1,60
0
15
0%1,
600
It is
a G
PG. P
re-a
ppro
ved
by th
e M
anag
emen
t C
omm
ittee
on
4/25
; cle
ar in
dica
tors
; tig
htly
link
ed
with
Env
ironm
ent S
SP a
lread
y di
scus
sed
by th
e Bo
ard.
ES
SD
Fore
sts
Basi
c fo
rest
sec
tor e
valu
atio
ns fo
r 15
coun
tries
. 44
5
N
.A.
350
It is
a G
PG. C
lear
del
iver
able
s; s
trong
link
to fr
ont-
line
oper
atio
ns; c
onsi
sten
t with
stro
ng s
uppo
rt fo
r Fo
rest
ESW
dur
ing
the
ongo
ing
disc
ussi
ons
on th
e Fo
rest
SSP
. Nee
d fo
r cla
rific
atio
n on
leve
rage
leve
l. ES
SD
Wat
er
Six
coun
try w
ater
reso
urce
m
anag
emen
t stra
tegi
es, a
nd c
ount
ry
wor
ksho
ps to
dis
cuss
out
com
es w
ith
stak
ehol
ders
.
420
25-1
00%
300
It is
a G
PG. C
lear
ly-d
efin
ed d
eliv
erab
les;
stro
ng lin
ks
with
fron
t-lin
e op
erat
ions
and
with
upc
omin
g SS
P.
DEC
/ PR
EM
Trad
e
Know
ledg
e cr
eatio
nan
ddi
ssem
inat
ion
to a
ddre
ss th
e co
nstra
ints
faci
ng d
evel
opin
g co
untri
es in
suc
cess
fully
inte
grat
ing
into
the
wor
ld e
cono
my.
1,64
034
5%1,
600
It is
a G
PG. H
igh
leve
rage
ratio
; int
er-u
nit
colla
bora
tion;
stro
ng li
nk to
fron
t-lin
e op
erat
ions
. (Im
prov
ed p
reci
sion
of i
ndic
ator
s of
pro
gres
s an
d su
cces
s an
d m
ains
tream
ing
stra
tegy
will
be s
ough
t.)
PREM
Gen
der
Mai
nstre
amin
g ge
nder
con
side
ratio
nsin
to E
SW, l
endi
ng, P
RSP
s an
d C
ASs,
an
d bu
ildin
g ca
paci
ty.
600
900%
600
Not
a G
PG p
riorit
y, b
ut h
as b
een
gran
ted
an
exce
ptio
n to
the
GPG
rule
by
4/25
Man
agem
ent
Com
mitt
ee d
ecis
ion.
Cle
ar in
dica
tors
and
tigh
t lin
kage
to G
ende
r SSP
and
fron
t-lin
e op
erat
ions
. H
DN
Red
ucin
g co
mm
unic
able
di
seas
es
Know
ledg
e cr
eatio
n an
d di
ssem
inat
ion,
pro
ject
pre
para
tion
and
supe
rvis
ion,
regi
onal
stra
tegi
es
2,00
0
295
%1,
600
It is
a G
PG. V
ery
clea
rly d
efin
ed d
eliv
erab
les;
stro
ng
link
to fr
ont-l
ine
oper
atio
ns.
PSI/O
il,
Gas
, and
C
hem
ical
s
Gas
flar
ing
redu
ctio
n Kn
owle
dge
crea
tion
and
diss
emin
atio
n, d
evel
opm
ent o
f st
anda
rds
and
finan
cing
mec
hani
sms,
an
d id
entif
icat
ion
of p
ilot p
roje
cts,
cr
eatio
n of
fram
ewor
k fo
r int
erna
tiona
l ac
tion;
825
23
2%
600
It is
a G
PG. H
igh
qual
ity p
ropo
sal w
ith c
lear
ly
defin
ed d
eliv
erab
les
but,
in th
e in
itial
pha
se,
som
ewha
t lim
ited
front
-line
focu
s.
PSI/G
ICT
Im
prov
ing
deliv
ery
of
info
rmat
ion
and
com
mun
icat
ion
tech
nolo
gy s
ervi
ces
TA, t
ask
man
ager
tool
kit,
know
ledg
e cr
eatio
n an
d di
ssem
inat
ion;
1,
010
57
%
600
It is
a G
PG. C
lear
ly d
efin
ed d
eliv
erab
les;
goo
d fro
nt-
line
focu
s, b
ut n
ot a
ver
y cl
ear e
xit s
trate
gy.
MN
A/PS
I
Dev
elop
cou
ntry
ow
ned
stra
tegi
es fo
r cre
atin
g an
en
ablin
g en
viro
nmen
t for
a
know
ledg
e ba
sed
econ
omy
in M
NA
Know
ledg
e cr
eatio
n an
d di
ssem
inat
ion,
iden
tific
atio
n of
pr
iorit
ies,
dev
elop
men
t of n
atio
nal
stra
tegi
es a
nd a
ctio
n pl
ans;
30
083
%25
0
It is
a G
PG. C
lear
ly d
efin
ed d
eliv
erab
les;
ver
y st
rong
fro
nt-li
ne fo
cus.
Tota
l: 8,
840
Tota
l: 7,
500
/1
Rat
io o
f oth
er fu
ndin
g / G
PG in
cent
ive
fund
ing
Ann
ex O
. R
ecen
t and
Sch
edul
ed E
valu
atio
ns o
f Glo
bal P
rogr
ams
Past
and
Ong
oing
Eva
luat
ions
Pr
ogra
m
star
ted
(Fis
cal
year
)
Dat
e co
mpl
eted
/ ex
pect
ed
Com
mis
-si
oned
by
Con
duct
ed b
y Ti
tle
Futu
re
eval
uatio
ns
sche
dule
d
DG
F-SU
PPO
RTE
D P
RO
GR
AMS
ESSD
Net
wor
k
Envi
ronm
ent
Crit
ical
Eco
syst
em P
artn
ersh
ip F
und
2000
FY
03
Fore
st A
llianc
e fo
r Con
serv
atio
n an
d Su
stai
nabl
e U
se
1999
FY02
Glo
bal M
echa
nism
to C
omba
t D
eser
tific
atio
n 20
01
FY
03
Rur
al D
evel
opm
ent
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up fo
r Int
erna
tiona
l Ag
ricul
tura
l Res
earc
h (C
GIA
R)
1972
Oct
199
8 C
GIA
RTe
am le
d by
Mau
rice
Stro
ng
Third
Sys
tem
Rev
iew
of t
he
CG
IAR
Glo
bal W
ater
Par
tner
ship
19
96
Dec
199
8 SI
DA
Selç
uk Ö
zged
iz a
nd
Björ
n Ax
elss
on
Rep
ort o
f the
Man
agem
ent
Advi
sory
Rev
iew
of t
he G
loba
l W
ater
Par
tner
ship
Wor
ld C
omm
issi
on o
n D
ams
1998
20
01
Wor
ld R
esou
rces
In
stitu
te, L
okay
an, a
nd
Law
yers
’ Env
ironm
enta
l Ac
tion
Team
A W
ater
shed
in G
loba
l G
over
nanc
e? A
n In
depe
nden
t As
sess
men
t of t
he W
CD
Soci
al D
evel
opm
ent
Smal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
June
200
1 W
orld
Ban
k C
hem
onic
s In
tern
atio
nal
Inc.
Wor
ld B
ank
Smal
l Gra
nts
Prog
ram
Eva
luat
ion,
FY
1998
-20
00, i
nter
nal d
ocum
ent
FY03
Post
-Con
flict
Fun
d 19
98
FY02
FSE
Net
wor
k
The
Toro
nto
Inte
rnat
iona
l Lea
ders
hip
Cen
ter f
or F
inan
cial
Sec
tor S
uper
visi
on
1999
M
ay 2
001
Toro
nto
Cen
terPr
ice
Wat
erho
use
Coo
pers
The
Toro
nto
Lead
ersh
ip
Cen
ter’s
Dev
elop
men
t Pr
ogra
m E
valu
atio
n
Annex O 94
Past
and
Ong
oing
Eva
luat
ions
Pr
ogra
m
star
ted
(Fis
cal
year
)
Dat
e co
mpl
eted
/ ex
pect
ed
Com
mis
-si
oned
by
Con
duct
ed b
y Ti
tle
Futu
re
eval
uatio
ns
sche
dule
d
Faci
lity
for F
inan
cial
Sec
tor
Stre
ngth
enin
g FY
02
FY03
HD
N N
etw
ork
Educ
atio
n
Th
e Pa
rtner
ship
for C
hild
Dev
elop
men
t
FY02
U
NES
CO
Inst
itute
for S
tatis
tics
FY
02
Tren
ds in
Mat
hem
atic
s an
d Sc
ienc
e Ac
hiev
emen
t Aro
und
the
Wor
ld
FY03
Wor
ld L
inks
19
98
FY00
W
orld
Lin
ks fo
r D
evel
opm
ent
Org
aniz
atio
n SR
I Int
erna
tiona
l
Wor
ld L
inks
for D
evel
opm
ent:
Acco
mpl
ishm
ents
and
C
halle
nges
(Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
tion
Annu
al R
epor
t 19
99-2
000)
Hea
lth, N
utrit
ion
& Po
pula
tion
Glo
bal F
orum
for H
ealth
Res
earc
h 19
98
FY02
Glo
bal M
icro
nutri
ent I
nitia
tive
(GM
I) FY
92
FY01
Mes
tor A
ssoc
iate
s,
Can
ada
The
Mic
ronu
trien
t Ini
tiativ
e-
Eval
uatio
n of
Pro
gram
s an
d O
pera
tions
(199
2-20
00)
Popu
latio
n an
d R
epro
duct
ive
Hea
lth
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g (P
RH
) 19
98
FY01
Anth
ony
R. M
eash
am
( for
mer
Ban
k St
aff)
Eval
uatio
n of
the
Popu
latio
n an
d R
epro
duct
ive
Hea
lth
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g Pr
ogra
m,
inte
rnal
doc
umen
t
FY05
Rol
l Bac
k M
alar
ia
1999
FY
03
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e fo
r Res
earc
h an
d Tr
aini
ng in
Tro
pica
l Dis
ease
s (T
DR
) 19
75
19
98TD
R J
oint
C
oord
inat
ing
Boar
d Te
am le
d by
H. W
igze
ll
Third
Ext
erna
l Rev
iew
of t
he
UN
DP/
Wor
ld B
ank/
WH
O
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e fo
r R
esea
rch
and
Trai
ning
in
Trop
ical
Dis
ease
s (T
DR
)
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e of
Res
earc
h,
Dev
elop
men
t & R
esea
rch
Trai
ning
in
Hum
an R
epro
duct
ion
(HR
P)
1988
FY02
95 Annex O
Past
and
Ong
oing
Eva
luat
ions
Pr
ogra
m
star
ted
(Fis
cal
year
)
Dat
e co
mpl
eted
/ ex
pect
ed
Com
mis
-si
oned
by
Con
duct
ed b
y Ti
tle
Futu
re
eval
uatio
ns
sche
dule
d
Stop
TB
1999
FY
02
UN
AID
S
19
96FY
02
PREM
Net
wor
k
Pa
rtner
ship
s in
Sta
tistic
s fo
r the
21st
C
entu
ry (P
ARIS
-21)
20
01
FY
03
Inte
grat
ed F
ram
ewor
k fo
r Tra
de
1997
Ju
ne 2
000
Inte
grat
ed
Fram
ewor
k In
ter-
Agen
cy
Wor
king
Gro
up
Team
Led
by
Sara
th
Raj
apat
hira
na
Rev
iew
of t
he In
tegr
ated
Fr
amew
ork
for T
echn
ical
As
sist
ance
for T
rade
D
evel
opm
ent o
f Lea
st
Dev
elop
ed C
ount
ries,
inte
rnal
do
cum
ent
FY04
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent N
etw
ork
(GD
N)
1998
FY
04
Forg
ing
Partn
ersh
ips
for G
ood
Gov
erna
nce
in P
ublic
Exp
endi
ture
and
R
ecor
ds M
anag
emen
t 20
02
FY
04
PSI N
etw
ork
Busi
ness
Par
tner
s fo
r Dev
elop
men
t 19
98
FY02
Info
rmat
ion
for D
evel
opm
ent (
Info
Dev
) 19
95
1998
W
orld
Ban
k Te
am le
d by
Ern
est J
. W
ilson
, III
Fina
l Rep
ort o
f the
Ext
erna
l R
evie
w T
eam
on
Info
Dev
, in
tern
al d
ocum
ent
Sola
r Dev
elop
men
t Gro
up
2000
FY
02
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up to
Ass
ist t
he
Poor
est (
CG
AP)
1995
1998
FY02
Publ
ic P
rivat
e In
frast
ruct
ure
Advi
sory
Fa
cilit
y (P
PIAF
) 20
00
The
Citi
es A
llianc
e 20
01
FY03
Annex O 96
Past
and
Ong
oing
Eva
luat
ions
Pr
ogra
m
star
ted
(Fis
cal
year
)
Dat
e co
mpl
eted
/ ex
pect
ed
Com
mis
-si
oned
by
Con
duct
ed b
y Ti
tle
Futu
re
eval
uatio
ns
sche
dule
d
NO
N-D
GF
PRO
GR
AMS
ESSD
Net
wor
k
Envi
ronm
ent
Glo
bal E
nviro
nmen
t Fac
ility
1991
N
ov 2
001
GEF
Cou
ncil
Leif
Chr
isto
ffers
en
Seco
nd O
vera
ll Pe
rform
ance
St
udy
of th
e G
EF
FY06
Rur
al D
evel
opm
ent
Glo
bal I
nteg
rate
d Pe
st M
anag
emen
t Fa
cilit
y 19
96
June
200
1Te
am le
d by
Jan
ice
Jigg
ins
Mid
-Ter
m R
evie
w o
f the
Glo
bal
IPM
Fac
ility
Soci
al D
evel
opm
ent
Inte
rnat
iona
l For
um o
n C
apac
ity
Build
ing
1998
Ju
ne 2
001
Wor
ld B
ank
and
Inte
r- Ac
tion
(an
asso
ciat
ion
of
US
NG
O’s
)
Team
led
by J
ette
Je
nsen
Rev
iew
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal
Foru
m o
n C
apac
ity B
uild
ing:
A
Mul
tista
keho
lder
Initi
ativ
e fo
r C
apac
ity B
uild
ing,
inte
rnal
do
cum
ent
PSI N
etw
ork
Ener
gy S
ecto
r Man
agem
ent A
ssis
tanc
e Pr
ogra
m (E
SMAP
) 19
82
June
200
0 W
orld
Ban
k’s
Ener
gy S
ecto
r Bo
ard
Guy
Car
uso,
Ane
ek
Brew
-Ham
mon
d, A
lso
Fabr
is, R
akes
h Ka
cker
, Er
ic S
orns
en a
nd N
egda
Ja
hans
hahi
Don
or-F
unde
d En
ergy
Pr
ogra
ms
–Fi
nal R
epor
t of t
he
Exte
rnal
Rev
iew
, int
erna
l do
cum
ent
Wat
er &
San
itatio
n Pr
ogra
m
1978
Se
ptem
ber
1999
D
ANID
A
Rev
iew
of t
he s
uppo
rt fo
r the
U
ND
P –
Wor
ld B
ank
Reg
iona
l W
ater
and
San
itatio
n G
roup
s fo
r Sou
th A
sia
and
for W
est
Cen
tral A
frica
Fore
ign
Inve
stm
ent A
dvis
ory
Serv
ice
1986
O
ct 1
998
IFC
/Wor
ld
Bank
Ope
ratio
ns E
valu
atio
n G
roup
/Ope
ratio
ns
Eval
uatio
n D
epar
tmen
t
An e
valu
atio
n of
the
Fore
ign
Inve
stm
ent A
dvis
ory
Serv
ice,
in
tern
al d
ocum
ent
97 Annex O
Annex P 98
Annex P. Likely Effect of Three Management Options on Global Program Issues
Issues Bank-wide
Committees and Corporate VPs
Sector Boards/ Network
Councils/Network VPs
Task Manager
Tune
C
urre
nt
Fram
e-w
ork
Cre
ate
M
D
Secr
etar
iat
Des
igna
te
Sing
le V
PU
Tune
C
urre
nt
Fram
e-w
ork
Cre
ate
MD
Se
cret
aria
t
Des
igna
te
Sing
le V
PU
Tune
C
urre
nt
Fram
e-w
ork
Cre
ate
MD
Se
cret
aria
t
Des
igna
te
Sing
le V
PU
Bank-wide global program strategy and mandate for intellectual leadership — — —
Inter-network priority — — —
Performance indicators to link with CASs and SSPs — — —
Criteria for resource allocation, budgeting, accounting, auditing — — —
Stra
tegy
Defined risk management policies — — —
Compliance with Bank-wide standards for priority setting, quality at entry, risk management
— — —
Quality assurance and enhanced standards — — —
Transparent processes for program phases from identification to evaluation — — — Se
lect
ivity
Clear network accountabilities — — —
—
Impl
emen
tatio
n
Budgetary resources to fulfill Bank’s commitment to partners —
Systematic approach for monitoring of program performance and review of ongoing portfolio
Clear responsibilities for Bank’s regions, networks, task managers
Independent evaluation to justify continued long-term support or mainstreaming of programs
Neutral Positive Highly Positive —Not Applicable
99 Annex Q
Annex Q. DGF Data on Program Approvals and Exits
Approval and Rejection of Network Proposals (FY02)
Network Total DGF financing ($million)
Total No. of DGF programs
/1
No. of new DGF
programs with MD approval
New DGF approvals that
are global programs
/2
New non-DGF global programs
/3
No. of DGF programs with
increased allocations
/4
No. of programs
rejected by DGF Council
/5
ESSD 68.26 9 3 3 0 1 6
HD 30.44 18 4 4 1 4 2
OPCS 18.88 3 3 0 0 0 0
PREM 37.98 0 7 3 2 3 1
PSI 19.41 9 1 1 0 0 3
0.5 1 1 1 0 0 0
175.47 47 15 11 1 8 12
1/ Bank Networks recommended 70 proposals (totaling $194 million) for DGF support. DGF Council rejected 12 proposals and there was a net reduction of 11 programs due to consolidating 17 programs into 6 programs.
2/ Includes programs that have been consolidated under the umbrella programs.
3/ Lymphatic Filariasis was approved in FY02 and is a US$20 million trust fund. The major partners include Gates Foundation, WHO, WB, DFID, Merck, GSK etc.
4/ The amount of funds allocated by DGF for program increases in FY02 amounted to US$4.31 million and those for new programs were US$4.08 - a total of US$8.9m were the freed up funds.
5/ The DGF Council rejected 10 applications for new programs and 2 applications for ongoing programs.
FSE
TOTAL
Annex Q 100
Development Grant Facility (DGF) Funds Freed-up from Exiting Programs
Programs Exits
(amounts in $ million)
FY02 Global Water Partnership 0.40 Global Micronutrient Initiative 1.20
0.33
Partnership in Statistics FY02 Total 2.68
Business Partners for Development 0.25 Gender and Africa Rural Travel & Transport Program
0.50
FY03 UN Convention to Combat Desertification 1.25
0.30 World Resources 2002-2003: Living in Ecosystems 0.15 Poverty & Soc. Welfare Monitoring in Transition Economies 0.10
Support to Autonomia Foundation 0.50 Global Corporate Governance forum 0.50 Provention Consortium 0.33 FY03 Total 3.13 FY04
0.47
Stop Tuberculosis Initiative 0.70 Global Forum For Health Research (INDEPTH & Eur.Obs.) 0.93
Program for Education Statistics 1.07 World Links for Development 0.75 Forum for Africa Women Educationalists 0.40 Partnership for Child Development
1.62
Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility 2.50 Cities Alliance Development Gateway Foundation 1.00 GDN: Education Research Component 0.75 Establishing a MENA Gender and Develop. Network 0.30
Forging Partnerships for Good Governance 0.90 Integrated Framework for Trade 0.50 Global Financial Management Partnership 0.65 Caribbean Regional Technical Assistance Center 0.73 Financial Sector Strengthening Facility 0.50
19.63
Natural Resource Degradation of Arid Lands
Forest Partnerships Program Roll Back Malaria 1.50
0.39 Program for the Assessment of Student Achievement Solar Development Group 2.00
1.70
FY04 Total
Ann
ex R
. Su
mm
ary
Stat
istic
s fro
m Q
uest
ionn
aire
Adm
inis
tere
d to
Tas
k M
anag
ers o
f Glo
bal
Prog
ram
s
Q
uest
ion
N
o. o
f re
spon
-de
nts
%
resp
onse
ra
te
Com
mun
i-ca
ble
dise
ases
Envi
ron-
men
tal
com
mon
s
Info
rmat
ion
&
know
ledg
e In
tern
atio
nal
finan
cial
ar
chite
ctur
e 1
In y
our o
pini
on, p
leas
e in
dica
te th
e gl
obal
pub
lic g
ood
prio
rity
that
is
mos
t con
sist
ent w
ith th
e pr
ogra
m’s
ob
ject
ives
. 12
7
91%
10
323
64
Empo
wer
-m
ent,
secu
rity
&
soci
al
incl
usio
n
Inve
stm
ent
clim
ate
Publ
ic s
ecto
r go
vern
ance
Ed
ucat
ion
Hea
lth
2410
1364
91%
3 To
wha
t deg
ree
do th
e fo
ur
Dev
elop
men
t Com
mitt
ee c
riter
ia
appl
y to
the
prog
ram
?
Very
ap
plic
able
Ap
plic
able
In
appl
icab
leVe
ry
inap
plic
able
48
16
0
0
91
%
64
54
0 0
10
6491
%
3526
30
91%
4
064
Trad
e &
in
tegr
atio
n
2 In
you
r opi
nion
, ple
ase
indi
cate
the
corp
orat
e ad
voca
cy p
riorit
y th
at is
m
ost c
onsi
sten
t with
the
prog
ram
’s
obje
ctiv
es.
7
10
• A
clea
r val
ue a
dded
to th
e Ba
nk’s
de
velo
pmen
t obj
ectiv
es
• Th
e ne
ed fo
r Ban
k ac
tion
to
cata
lyze
oth
er re
sour
ces
and
partn
ersh
ips
•
A si
gnifi
cant
com
para
tive
adva
ntag
e fo
r the
Ban
k
64
• An
em
ergi
ng in
tern
atio
nal
cons
ensu
s th
at g
loba
l act
ion
is
requ
ired
47
13
91%
101 Annex R
4 In
you
r opi
nion
, wha
t com
para
tive
adva
ntag
e do
es th
e B
ank
brin
g to
th
e pr
ogra
m re
lativ
e to
the
othe
r pa
rtne
rs in
the
prog
ram
?
N
eglig
ible
Hig
hSu
bsta
ntia
lM
odes
t
5290
%
24
32
70
6390
%
30
21
41
5680
%
47
12
21
6289
%
27
90%
30
60
63
36
20
61
6390
%
5 To
wha
t ext
ent w
ere
the
six
appr
oval
cr
iteria
for e
ngag
ing
in p
artn
ersh
ips
addr
esse
d at
the
time
whe
n th
e B
ank
deci
ded
to b
ecom
e in
volv
ed in
the
prog
ram
?
Fully
ad
dres
sed
Mos
tly
addr
esse
d M
ostly
not
ad
dres
sed
Not
ad
dres
sed
45
91
%
163
064
48
151
0
6491
%
•
A cl
ear a
sses
smen
t of t
he
finan
cial
/fidu
ciar
y an
d re
puta
tiona
l ris
ks to
the
Bank
30
1911
4
6491
%
19
368
164
91%
•
A cl
ear u
nder
stan
ding
of h
ow th
e pr
ogra
m w
ill be
impl
emen
ted
and
man
aged
, inc
ludi
ng a
tim
e fra
me
and
an e
xit s
trate
gy
29
7
2
26
6491
%
•
Glo
bal m
anda
te a
nd re
ach
9
2 0
63
• In
-dep
th c
ount
ry-le
vel k
now
ledg
e
• M
ulti-
sect
oral
cap
acity
• C
onve
ning
pow
er
• Ex
perti
se in
cou
ntry
and
sec
tor
leve
l ana
lysi
s
• M
obiliz
ing
finan
cial
reso
urce
s
• A
clea
r lin
kage
to th
e Ba
nk’s
cor
e in
stitu
tiona
l obj
ectiv
es a
nd c
ount
ry
oper
atio
nal w
ork
• A
stro
ng c
ase
for B
ank
parti
cipa
tion
base
d on
com
para
tive
adva
ntag
e
• A
thor
ough
ana
lysi
s of
the
expe
cted
leve
l of B
ank
reso
urce
s re
quire
d
Annex R 102
20
11
32
1
64
91%
In y
our o
pini
on, t
o w
hat d
egre
e w
ere
(are
) the
ben
efic
iarie
s in
volv
ed in
the
desi
gn, i
mpl
emen
tatio
n, a
nd
mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
of th
e pr
ogra
m?
Hig
h Su
bsta
ntia
lM
odes
tN
eglig
ible
19
14
225
6086
%
3816
42
6086
%
22
25
102
5984
%
Wha
t deg
ree
of e
ach
type
of r
isk
is
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
e pr
ogra
m?
220
40
6390
%
4
18
1130
63
90%
0
83%
4
1341
58
14
1839
62
0
89%
0
1349
62
03
62
89%
• Th
e de
velo
pmen
t of a
co
mm
unic
atio
n pl
an fo
r co
mm
unic
atin
g w
ith a
nd in
volv
ing
key
stak
ehol
ders
6
• D
esig
n
• Im
plem
enta
tion
• M
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n
7 H
igh
Subs
tant
ial
Mod
est
Neg
ligib
le
1
•
Fidu
ciar
y/fin
anci
al ri
sks
• R
eput
atio
nal r
isks
• U
nfai
r adv
anta
ge
•
Con
flict
of i
nter
est r
isks
89%
• D
ilutio
n of
the
Bank
’s c
onve
ning
po
wer
•
Div
ersi
on o
f the
Ban
k’s
reso
urce
s to
non
-prio
rity
area
s
9
50
103 Annex R
Ann
ex S
. Su
mm
ary
Stat
istic
s fro
m Q
uest
ionn
aire
Adm
inis
tere
d to
Tas
k M
anag
ers o
f Ban
k’s
Len
ding
Ope
ratio
ns
Q
uest
ion
No.
of
Res
-po
nse
rate
re
spon
-de
nts
To w
hat e
xten
t are
you
fam
iliar
with
ea
ch o
f the
pro
gram
s in
you
r sec
tor?
N
ever
hea
rd
of th
e pr
ogra
m
Hea
rd o
f it,
but n
ot
fam
iliar
with
it
Som
ewha
t fa
mili
ar w
ith
it
Very
fam
iliar
w
ith it
Envi
ronm
ent
416
%
Fo
rest
ry
8.33
%8.
33%
29.1
7%54
.17%
640
%
Wat
er re
sour
ces
0.00
%25
.00%
50.0
0%25
.00%
3
Agric
ultu
re37
.74%
1131
%
Fi
nanc
ials
ecto
r
18
.18%
3
45.4
5%9.
09%
27.2
7%20
%
Ed
ucat
ion
32.6
5%6.
12%
38.7
8%22
.45%
739
%
Hea
lth, n
utrit
ion
& po
pula
tion
20.6
3%
28.5
7%
38.1
0%
7
6.67
%6.
67%
19%
C
omm
unic
atio
ns &
info
rmat
ion
tech
nolo
gy
0.00
%
18.7
5%
37.5
0%
43.7
5%
440
%
En
ergy
26%
26
.00%
25.0
0%8.
33%
41.6
7%6
Pr
ivat
e se
ctor
dev
elop
men
t 8.
33%
50
.00%
25
.00%
16
.67%
4
33%
0.00
%0.
00%
25.0
0%75
.00%
444
%
U
rban
31
.58%
5.26
%26
.32%
36.8
4%10
56%
W
ater
& s
anita
tion
0.00
%
10.0
0%
0.00
%
90.0
0%
10
50%
2 H
ave
you
used
the
prod
ucts
or t
he
serv
ices
of t
hese
pro
gram
s in
you
r co
untr
y-re
late
d ac
tiviti
es?
Yes
No
En
viro
nmen
t
71.8
8%
4
28.1
3%16
%
Fo
rest
ry
66.6
7%33
.33%
640
%
W
ater
reso
urce
s
80
.00%
20.0
0%3
14%
Ag
ricul
ture
20
.00%
80.0
0%11
31%
Fi
nanc
ials
ecto
r
18
.18%
81.8
2%3
20%
Ed
ucat
ion
26.5
3%
7
39%
73
.47%
H
ealth
, nut
ritio
n &
popu
latio
n 41
.27%
58.7
3%7
28%
1
9.38
%
34.3
8%
25.0
0%
31.2
5%
14
%
33
.96%
15
.09%
13
.21%
12
.70%
28
%
PR
EM n
etw
ork
50.0
0%
36.6
7%
6
M
icro
-fina
nce
Annex S 104
Q
uest
ion
No.
of
resp
on-
dent
s
Res
-po
nse
rate
PREM
net
wor
k
86.6
7%
13.3
3%6
19%
37.5
0%40
%
En
ergy
50
.00%
50
.00%
6
26%
Pr
ivat
e se
ctor
dev
elop
men
t 25
.00%
75.0
0%4
33%
M
icro
-fina
nce
0%
10
0%4
44%
U
rban
36
.84%
63.1
6%10
56%
W
ater
& s
anita
tion
10
70
.00%
30.0
0%50
%
To
tal
85
31%
3 H
ave
your
cou
ntry
-leve
l cou
nter
part
s sh
own
inte
rest
in th
e pr
oduc
ts o
r se
rvic
es o
f the
se p
rogr
ams?
Yes
No
En
viro
nmen
t 42
.86%
57.1
4%4
16%
Fo
rest
ry
40
%
58.3
3%41
.67%
6
W
ater
reso
urce
s
3
20
.00%
80.0
0%14
%
38.4
6%11
31%
320
%
30.2
3%69
.77%
739
%
H
ealth
, nut
ritio
n &
popu
latio
n
7
47
.62%
52.3
8%28
%
PR
EM n
etw
ork
6.67
%
6
93
.33%
19%
C
omm
unic
atio
ns &
info
rmat
ion
tech
nolo
gy
85.7
1%
4
14
.29%
40%
En
ergy
55
.56%
44.4
4%6
26%
Pr
ivat
e se
ctor
dev
elop
men
t
33
.33%
66.6
7%4
33%
100%
0%4
44%
47.3
7%52
.63%
1056
%
70.0
0%10
To
tal
85
31%
C
omm
unic
atio
ns &
info
rmat
ion
tech
nolo
gy
62
.50%
4
Ag
ricul
ture
61.5
4%
Fi
nanc
ial s
ecto
r 45
.45%
54
.55%
Ed
ucat
ion
M
icro
-fina
nce
U
rban
W
ater
& s
anita
tion
30
.00%
50%
105 Annex S
Q
uest
ion
No.
of
resp
on-
dent
s
Res
-po
nse
rate
4
Are
the
obje
ctiv
es a
nd a
ctiv
ities
of
each
pro
gram
rele
vant
to y
our
coun
trie
s’ c
urre
nt d
evel
opm
ent
prio
ritie
s (P
RSP
s or
CA
Ss)?
Yes
No
Don
’tkn
ow
En
viro
nmen
t
56
.25%
0.00
%43
.75%
416
%
Fo
rest
ry
45.8
3%16
.67%
37.5
0%6
40%
W
ater
reso
urce
s 20
.00%
40.0
0%40
.00%
14%
Ag
ricul
ture
3.70
%
11
31%
33
.33%
62.9
6%
Fi
nanc
ials
ecto
r
0.00
%
41.6
7%
58
.33%
320
%
Ed
ucat
ion
55.1
0%12
.24%
32.6
5%
7 39
%
H
ealth
, nut
ritio
n &
popu
latio
n
7
71
.43%
1.59
%26
.98%
28%
33.3
3%6.
67%
60.0
0%6
19%
C
omm
unic
atio
ns &
info
rmat
ion
tech
nolo
gy
0.00
%43
.75%
440
%
En
ergy
9.09
%
6 26
%
63.6
4%
3
PR
EM n
etw
ork
56.2
5%
27.2
7%
Pr
ivat
e se
ctor
dev
elop
men
t
33
.33%
58.3
3%4
33%
M
icro
-fina
nce
100%
0%44
%
47.3
7%0.
00%
52.6
3%10
W
ater
& s
anita
tion
80.0
0%
20
.00%
0%10
50%
To
tal
85
31%
Ove
rall,
wha
t asp
ects
of t
he g
loba
l pr
ogra
ms
in y
our s
ecto
r do
you
find
mos
t use
ful f
rom
the
pers
pect
ive
of
coun
try
oper
atio
ns?
Not
use
ful
A li
ttle
usef
ul
Mod
erat
ely
usef
ul
Very
use
ful
Don
’t kn
ow
Not
ap
plic
able
7.
69%
28.2
1%29
.49%
16.6
7%78
28%
Cre
atin
g an
d sh
arin
g kn
owle
dge
on b
est
prac
tices
in y
our s
ecto
r 3.
90%
10.3
9%45
.45%
18.1
8%0%
7828
%
Bu
ildin
g a
glob
al c
onse
nsus
on
best
pr
actic
es in
you
r sec
tor
3.80
%24
.05%
39.2
4%20
.25%
7828
%
Advo
catin
g a
spec
ific
appr
oach
to
deve
lopm
ent i
n yo
ur s
ecto
r 5.
13%
20.5
1%24
.36%
17.9
5%0%
28%
Dev
elop
ing
new
pro
duct
s an
d 12
.00%
34.0
0%26
.00%
18
.00%
2.00
%78
28%
8.33
%
0%4
U
rban
56
%
5
Esta
blis
hing
glo
bal r
ules
and
sta
ndar
ds in
yo
ur s
ecto
r 14
.10%
1.
28%
20
.78%
11.3
9%0%
29
.49%
78
6.
00%
Annex S 106
Q
uest
ion
No.
of
resp
on-
dent
s
Res
-po
nse
rate
te
chno
logi
es in
you
r sec
tor
Im
prov
ing
acce
ss o
f cou
ntrie
s to
new
pr
oduc
ts a
nd te
chno
logi
es
6.49
%
14
.29%
31.1
7%27
.27%
19.4
8%0%
7828
%
Pr
ovid
ing
upst
ream
dia
gnos
tic a
nd
advi
sory
ser
vice
s 6.
25%
20.0
0%27
.50%
27.5
0%17
.50%
0%78
28%
Su
ppor
ting
natio
nal-l
evel
pol
icy
and
inst
itutio
nal r
efor
ms
10.3
9%
14
.29%
23.3
8%32
.47%
16.8
8%0%
7828
%
Pr
epar
ing
inve
stm
ent p
roje
cts
in y
our
sect
or
11.2
5%
23
.75%
26.2
5%18
.75%
16.2
5%0%
7828
%
Bu
ildin
g co
untry
-leve
l cap
acity
in y
our
sect
or
5.26
%
17
.11%
27.6
3%30
.26%
17.1
1%0%
7828
%
Fi
nanc
ing
coun
try-le
vel i
nves
tmen
ts in
yo
ur s
ecto
r 20
.25%
20.2
5%21
.52%
15.1
9%17
.72%
1.27
%78
28%
H
elpi
ng to
impr
ove
Bank
ope
ratio
ns in
yo
ur s
ecto
r
28.5
7%
10.3
9%19
.48%
19.4
8%18
.18%
0%78
28%
17.7
2%11
.39%
21.5
2%25
.32%
20.2
5%1.
27%
7828
%
Impr
ovin
g co
mm
unity
-leve
l par
ticip
atio
n in
you
r sec
tor
23.3
8%15
.58%
18.1
8%20
.78%
18.1
8%1.
30%
7828
%
Im
prov
ing
dono
r coo
rdin
atio
n in
you
r se
ctor
107 Annex S
The
follo
win
g ar
e th
e gl
obal
pro
gram
s in
eac
h se
ctor
. En
viro
nmen
t
•
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up o
n In
tern
atio
nal A
gric
ultu
ral R
esea
rch
• C
onsu
ltativ
e G
roup
on
Inte
rnat
iona
l Agr
icul
tura
l Res
earc
h •
Col
labo
rativ
e Pa
rtner
ship
on
Fore
sts
• C
ritic
al E
cosy
stem
Par
tner
ship
Fun
d •
Wor
ld B
ank/
WW
F Fo
rest
Allia
nce
for C
onse
rvat
ion
and
Sust
aina
ble
Use
•
Glo
bal M
echa
nism
of t
he U
NC
CD
to C
omba
t Des
ertif
icat
ion
• In
tern
atio
nal C
oral
Ree
f Ini
tiativ
e •
Fore
st T
rend
s
• M
illenn
ium
Eco
syst
em A
sses
smen
t W
ater
reso
urce
s •
Prot
otyp
e C
arbo
n Fu
nd
•
Glo
bal E
nviro
nmen
t Fac
ility
•
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up o
n In
tern
atio
nal A
gric
ultu
ral R
esea
rch
• M
ultil
ater
al F
und
for t
he Im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e M
ontre
al P
roto
col
• G
loba
l Wat
er P
artn
ersh
ip
•
GEF
/IUC
N/W
B/W
WF
Wat
er R
esou
rces
Par
tner
ship
Fo
rest
ry
Annex S 108 108 Annex S
• Th
e W
orld
Com
mis
sion
on
Dam
s •
Glo
bal M
icro
nutri
ent I
nitia
tive
•
Popu
latio
n an
d R
epro
duct
ive
Hea
lth C
apac
ity B
uild
ing
Prog
ram
(P
RH
) A
gric
ultu
re
•
Rol
l Bac
k M
alar
ia
• C
apac
ity B
uild
ing
for T
rade
Pol
icy,
Stra
tegy
Dev
elop
men
t, an
d W
TO N
egot
iatio
ns
• Sp
ecia
l Pro
gram
me
for R
esea
rch
and
Trai
ning
in T
ropi
cal
Dis
ease
s (T
DR
) •
Com
mod
ity P
rice
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t Pro
ject
•
Spec
ial P
rogr
amm
e of
Res
earc
h, D
evel
opm
ent &
Res
earc
h Tr
aini
ng in
Hum
an R
epro
duct
ion
(HR
P)
• C
onsu
ltativ
e G
roup
on
Inte
rnat
iona
l Agr
icul
tura
l Res
earc
h •
Glo
bal I
nteg
rate
d Pe
st M
anag
emen
t Fac
ility
•
Stop
TB
• Th
e Po
pula
r Coa
litio
n to
Era
dica
te H
unge
r and
Pov
erty
•
UN
AID
S (J
oint
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
Pro
gram
me
on H
IV/A
IDS)
PREM
net
wor
k Fi
nanc
ial s
ecto
r
•
Partn
ersh
ips
in S
tatis
tics
for t
he 2
1st C
entu
ry (P
ARIS
-21)
•
Faci
lity
for F
inan
cial
Sec
tor S
treng
then
ing
• In
tegr
ated
Fra
mew
ork
for T
rade
•
The
Toro
nto
Inte
rnat
iona
l Lea
ders
hip
Cen
tre fo
r Fin
anci
al S
ecto
r Su
perv
isio
n •
Glo
bal D
evel
opm
ent N
etw
ork
• D
AC N
etw
ork
on G
ood
Gov
erna
nce
and
Cap
acity
Dev
elop
men
t (G
OVN
ET)
• Fi
nanc
ial S
ecto
r Ass
essm
ent P
rogr
am
• Fi
nanc
ial S
tabi
lity
Foru
m
• Fo
rgin
g Pa
rtner
ship
s fo
r Goo
d G
over
nanc
e in
Pub
lic
Expe
nditu
re a
nd R
ecor
ds M
anag
emen
t Ed
ucat
ion
Com
mun
icat
ions
& in
form
atio
n te
chno
logy
•
Focu
sing
Res
ourc
es o
n Ef
fect
ive
Scho
ol H
ealth
• Th
e Pa
rtner
ship
for C
hild
Dev
elop
men
t •
The
Dev
elop
men
t Gat
eway
Fou
ndat
ion
• U
NES
CO
Inst
itute
for S
tatis
tics
• G
loba
l Dev
elop
men
t Lea
rnin
g N
etw
ork
• O
ECD
Wor
ld E
duca
tion
Indi
cato
rs P
rogr
am
• Th
e G
loba
l Kno
wle
dge
Partn
ersh
ip
• Tr
ends
in M
athe
mat
ics
and
Scie
nce
Achi
evem
ent A
roun
d th
e W
orld
•
The
Info
rmat
ion
for D
evel
opm
ent P
rogr
am (i
nfoD
ev)
Ener
gy
• Pr
ogre
ss in
Inte
rnat
iona
l Rea
ding
Lite
racy
Stu
dy
•
Wor
ld L
inks
• En
ergy
Sec
tor M
anag
emen
t Ass
ista
nce
Prog
ram
me
•
Sola
r Dev
elop
men
t Gro
up
Hea
lth, n
utrit
ion
& p
opul
atio
n Pr
ivat
e se
ctor
dev
elop
men
t
•
Glo
bal F
orum
for H
ealth
Res
earc
h •
Busi
ness
Par
tner
s fo
r Dev
elop
men
t •
Glo
bal A
llianc
e fo
r Vac
cine
s an
d Im
mun
izat
ion
• Fo
reig
n In
vest
men
t Adv
isor
y Se
rvic
e
109 Annex S
• G
loba
l Cor
pora
te G
over
nanc
e Fo
rum
•
Publ
ic-P
rivat
e In
frast
ruct
ure
Advi
sory
Fac
ility
Mic
ro-fi
nanc
e •
Con
sulta
tive
Gro
up to
Ass
ist t
he P
oore
st
Urb
an
• C
ities
Allia
nce
• Pr
oven
tion
Con
sorti
um
Wat
er &
san
itatio
n •
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
Prog
ram
Annex T 110
Annex T. Survey Questionnaire with Respect to the GPG Fund Administered to Task Managers of the Bank’s Lending Operations 1. Before responding to this survey, were you aware of the five Global Public Goods (GPG)
priorities and the five Corporate Advocacy Priorities that are outlined in the most recent Strategic Directions Paper and presented immediately below? __ Yes __ No
Global Public Goods Priorities 1. Communicable diseases 2. Environmental commons 3. Information and knowledge 4. Trade and integration 5. International financial architecture
Corporate Advocacy Priorities 1. Empowerment, security, and social inclusion 2. Investment climate 3. Public sector governance 4. Education 5. Health
111 Annex T
2. In your opinion, should these global priorities drive some of the Bank’s country and regional programs? __ Yes __ No __Don’t know
3. Before responding to this survey, were you aware of the Global Public Goods Fund (of $7.5 million in FY02) which the Bank’s Management Committee established in April 2001 to provide additional incentives to encourage work on GPG priorities at the country and regional levels? __ Yes __ No
4. Do you agree with each of the allocation criteria developed by the Operational VPs and approved by the Management Committee? 1 = Yes, 2 = No, 3 = Don't know
• Alignment of the proposal to GPG Priorities (and only in exceptional cases) to Corporate Advocacy Priorities
• Designed truly as an incentive to regional and country program action in the specified GPG area, with clearly stated objectives, deliverables, and monitorable indicators
• Strong links to front-line work in Regions • Substantial commitment of Regions and Networks to match GPG Fund resources from
their own unit budgets • No presumption of continued funding in FY03, and therefore sufficient value added and
demonstration effect to justify corporate support even in the absence of continued funding for FY03
5. To the best of your knowledge, was your Region consulted in preparing the eight proposals listed
below that were successful? 1 = Yes, 2 = No, 3 = Don't know, 4 = Not applicable (Answer “Not applicable” if you are not associated with the relevant network.)
• ESSD: Environmental mainstreaming in country ESW, lending, and PRSPs • ESSD: Forest sector evaluations in 15 countries • ESSD: Water resource management strategies in six countries • HDN: Reducing communicable diseases • PREM/DEC: Addressing constraints facing developing countries in successfully
integrating into the world economy • PREM: Mainstreaming gender considerations into ESW, lending, PRSPs and CASs • PSI: Natural gas flaring reduction initiative • PSI: Improving World Bank Group’s delivery of information and communication
technology services The following are the global programs in the sector in which you are working:
• Program #1 • Program #2 • Program #3
6. To what extent are you familiar with each of these programs?
1 = Never heard of the program, 2 = Heard of it, but not familiar with it 3 = Somewhat familiar with it, 4 = Very familiar with it
• Program #1 • Program #2 • Program #3
Annex T 112
7. Have you used the products or the services of these programs in your country-related activities? 1 = Yes, 2 = No
• Program #1 • Program #2 • Program #3
8. Have your country-level counterparts shown interest in the products or services of these
programs? 1 = Yes, 2 = No • Program #1 • Program #2 • Program #3
9. Are the objectives and activities of each program relevant to your countries' current development
priorities (PRSPs or CASs)? 1 = Yes, 2 = No, 3 = Don't know (Answer “Don't know” if you have not heard of the program.)
• Program #1 • Program #2 • Program #3
10. Overall, what aspects of these global programs do you find most useful from the perspective of
country operations? 1 = Not useful, 2 = A little useful, 3 = Moderately useful 4 = Very useful, 5 = Don't know, 6 = Not applicable (Answer “Don't know” if you have not heard of any of the global programs in your sector. Answer “Not applicable” if, to the best of your knowledge, the global programs in your sector do not provide the particular products or services indicated.)
• Establishing global rules and standards in your sector • Creating and sharing knowledge on best practices in your sector • Building a global consensus on best practices in your sector • Advocating a specific approach to development in your sector • Developing new products and technologies in your sector • Improving access of countries to new products and technologies • Providing upstream diagnostic and advisory services • Supporting national-level policy and institutional reforms • Preparing investments projects in your sector • Building country-level capacity in your sector • Financing country-level investments in your sector • Helping to improve Bank operations in your sector • Improving donor coordination in your sector • Improving community-level participation in your sector • Other? Please specify
11. Which countries are you presently working on? 12. Please fell free to add any comments that you might have concerning the relevance of the Bank's
global programs in enhancing the effectiveness of country operational work in your sector.