identification of atat1 as a major alpha-tubulin...
TRANSCRIPT
Identification of Atat1 as a major alpha-tubulin
acetyltransferase dispensable for mouse development
Go Woon Kim
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology
Faculty of Medicine
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
December 2012
A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of
Master of Science
© Go Woon Kim 2012
II
ABSTRACT
Post-translational modification is one crucial cellular mechanism through
which proteins are altered in structure and function. A variety of proteins different
in function and cellular localization is affected by such modification. With a wide
range of influence within a cell, lysine acetylation has emerged as one major post-
translational modification that rivals to phosphorylation. Indeed, recent proteomic
studies have revealed that lysine acetylation affects 5-10 % of mammalian and
bacterial proteins. This modification is catalyzed by the opposing actions of lysine
acetyltransferases and deacetylases. One of the first acetylated proteins identified
in the mid-1980s is α-tubulin, a subunit of microtubules that comprise the
cytoskeletal network. Although deacetylation of α-tubulin is well known to be
catalyzed by HDAC6, the responsible acetyltransferase remained elusive until
recently. The recent discovery of Atat1 (α-tubulin acetyltransferase 1) has yielded
important insights into the role of acetylated α-tubulin in lower organisms such as
C. elegans, but it remains unclear whether this is also the case in vivo in higher
organisms such as mammals. Here, using mice devoid of Atat1, I demonstrate that
Atat1 is a major acetyltransferase of α-tubulin dispensable for mouse
development. I also show that Atat1 is highly expressed in testis, renal pelvis,
gastrointestinal tract, and hippocampus, but development of these tissues appears
normal in the absence of Atat1. Moreover, in a set of molecular and cellular
studies, I have identified ATAT1 as a potential interaction partner of several
proteins. Together, these findings provide direct support of Atat1 as an authentic
III
α-tubulin acetyltransferase, thereby setting up a solid foundation for additional
studies of this enzyme and tubulin acetylation in mice and humans.
IV
RÉ SUMÉ
La modification post-traductionnelles des protéines est un mécanisme
cellulaire essentiel par laquel la structure et la fonction des protéines peuvent-être
affectées. Les modifications sont présentes dans la grande majorité de voie
cellulaire et les protéines cibles possèdent une grande diversité de fonction et de
localisation cellulaire. L’acétylation des lysines a émergé comme une
modification de grande importance, ayant un impact majeur sur les cellules, à
l’instar de la phosphorylation. Effet, des études récentes de protéomique ont
révélées que de 5 à 10 % des protéines bactériennes et animales étaient affectées
par l’acétylation des lysines. Cette mondification est catalysé par l’effet inverse de
deux classes de protéines, les lysines acétyltransférase et les déactylases. L'une
des premières protéines identifiées dans acétylés milieu des années 1980 est l’α-
tubuline, une sous-unité des microtubules qui composent le réseau du
cytosquelette. Malgré que l’enzyme responsable de la déacétylation de l’α-
tubuline est connue sous le nom HDAC6, l’enzyme responsable de son
acétylation est restée inconnue jusqu’à récemment. La découverte d’Atat1 (α-
tubuline acétyltransférase1) a donné des informations importantes sur le rôle de l’
aétylation sur l’α-tubuline dans les organismses inférieurs comme C. elegans,
mais il reste difficile de savoir si c’est aussi le cas in vivo dans les organismes
supérieurs commes les mammifères. En utilisant des modèles murin de Atat1, je
démontre que Atat1 est une acétyltransférase majeur de l’α-tubuline dispensable
pour le développement normal. De plus, je démontre que le niveau d’expression
d’Atat1 est particulièrement élevé dans les testicules, le bassinet du rein, le tractus
V
gastro-intestinal, et l’hippocampe, pourtant, le développement de ces tissus
semble normal en l'absence de Atat1. En outre, dans une série d'études
moléculaires et cellulaires, j'ai identifié ATAT1 comme un partenaire potentiel
d'interaction de plusieurs autres protéines. Ces résultats non seulement apporter
un soutien supplémentaire de la Atat1 comme une acétyltransférase authentique
de l’α-tubuline, mais aussi mettre en place une bonne base pour des études
supplémentaires de cette protéine chez les souris et les humains.
VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This thesis work presented herein has been completed with the help of
many people. Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Xiang-Jiao Yang
for guiding me during the course of the studies and providing valuable
suggestions and advice. His vast amount of experience and passion for science
also helped me gain insight into the scientific research in depth. No matter
whether it is short or long, science-related or not, discussion with him always
made me learn and stimulated me to do better.
Secondly, I would like to thank my colleagues, former and current,
including Dr. H. Taniguchi, Dr. D. Walkinshaw, Dr. S. Tahmasebi, Dr. J. Nie, G.
Gocevski, R. Weist, Y. Lu, C.J. Wu, K. Yan, L. You, H. Salem, M. Ghorbani, T.
Sabri, H.I. Kim, L. Chen, H.Y. Ham, and many others for sharing scientific
knowledge and laughs during the course of my research. I am particularly grateful
to Dr. Taniguchi for teaching me very patiently about various techniques,
especially those related to mice, in the first six months or so after I joined the lab.
The experience that I have had with him and others in the lab is one memory so
valuable that it can never be forgotten.
Thirdly, special thanks should be given to M. Flamand in the neighbor lab
for French translation of the abstract. I am also thankful to Dr. Craig Mandato, Dr.
Stefano Stefani, and Dr. René St-Arnaud for serving as my mentor/committee
members. Their kind and intellectual suggestions helped improve the research to
be described herein. I would like to thank Dr. Jaeok Park for carefully reading and
editing a close-to-final version of this thesis.
VII
Finally, I must thank all my friends and family, who supported me with
never-failing love in every situation I have been. Their constant support equipped
me with courage and strength to step forward to this achievement.
The research presented here was supported by funding from CIHR,
NSERC, and MDEIE (to Dr. X.J. Yang).
VIII
PUBLICATIONS
1. Kim, G.W., et al., Dietary, metabolic, and potentially environmental
modulation of the lysine acetylation machinery. Int J Cell Biol, 2010. 2010:
p. 632739.
2. Kim, G.W. and X.J. Yang, Comprehensive lysine acetylomes emerging from
bacteria to humans. Trends Biochem Sci, 2011. 36(4): p. 211-20.
3. Aka, J.A., G.W. Kim, and X.J. Yang, K-acetylation and its enzymes: overview
and new developments. Handb Exp Pharmacol, 2011. 206: p. 1-12.
IX
CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTHORS
CHAPTER II:
Identification of Atat1 as a major α-tubulin acetyltransferase dispensable for
mouse development
I performed most of the experiments presented in this chapter, with several
expression constructs given by others (see below). I also prepared all the figures
and wrote the manuscript. In collaboration with Dr. Yang, I designed the
experiments, edited, and finalized the manuscript.
Dr. Jianyun Nie prepared the HA-AKAP8, HA-AKAP8L, HA-TUBB4, HA-
TIF1β, and HA-MAGED2 expression constructs. Dr. Ed Seto and his colleagues
at University of South Florida engineered the HA-RAC1 and FLAG-cortactin
expression constructs. The FLAG-HSP90 plasmid construct was provided by Dr.
Jason Young at McGill University.
The mass spectrometry shown in Table 1 was carried out in collaboration with Dr.
Jin Jing in Dr. Tony Pawson’s laboratory at University of Toronto.
X
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT................... ......................................................................................... II
RÉSUMÉ .............................................................................................................. IV
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.... .................................................................. ............VI
PUBLICATIONS ................................................................................. ...............VIII
CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTHORS ..................................................... ...............IX
TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................... ...............X
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS...... ........................................................ ................XII
CHAPTER I
Literature Review
1. Post-translational modifications. ......................................................................2
1.1 Cellular function of post-translational modifications ..................................3
1.2 Lysine acetylation .........................................................................................3
2. Lysine acetyltransferases and deacetylases ..................................................4
2.1 Families of lysine acetyltransferases....... ....................................................5
2.2 Histone deacetylase superfamily ..................................................................5
2.3 Lysine acetylation in different cellular processes ......................................6
2.3.1 Lysine acetylation in chromatid cohesion complex ...............................6
2.3.2 Lysine acetylation in metabolism .............................................................7
2.3.3 Lysine acetylation in other cytoplasmic events ......................................8
3. Microtubule .......................................................................................................9
3.1 Microtubule regulation ..................................................................................9
3.2 α-Tubulin modifications .............................................................................11
3.2.1 Poly-glutamylation and poly-glycylation ................................................11
3.2.2 Tyrosination and detyrosination ..............................................................12
3.2.3 Acetylation ..............................................................................................12
3.3 Lysine acetyltransferases and deacetylases of α-tubulin ..........................12
XI
4. Physiological roles of acetylated lysine 40 of α-tubulin ..........................14
4.1 Acetylated α-tubulin in primary cilia ........................................................14
4.2 Acetylated α-tubulin in intracellular trafficking........................................15
4.3 Acetylated α-tubulin in the central nervous system (CNS)......................16
4.4 Acetylated α-tubulin in cell cycle control and cancer ..............................16
5. Rationale for the thesis research project ....................................................18
6. Figures and Legends .......................................................................................19
7. References ........................................................................................................25
CHAPTER II
Identification of Atat1 as a major α-tubulin acetyltransferase
dispensable for mouse development
1. Abstract ............................................................................................................34
2. Introduction .....................................................................................................35
3. Materials and Methods ..................................................................................38
4. Results ..............................................................................................................46
5. Discussion and Conclusion .............................................................................55
6. Illustrations ......................................................................................................60
7. References ........................................................................................................80
XII
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AKAP8 A-kinase anchor protein 8
AKAP8L AKAP8-like
ARD1 ADP-ribosylation factor domain protein 1
ATAT1 α-Tubulin acetyltransferase
ATP Adenosine-5’-triphosphate
AurA Aurora A
BBS4 Bardet-Biedl syndrome 4 protein
BDNF Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
BMAL1 Brain and muscle Arnt-like protein 1
B. subtilis Bacillus subtilis
CBP CREB-binding protein
C. difficile Clostridium difficile
cDNA Complementary DNA
C. elegans Caenorhabditis elegans
Chk1 Checkpoint kinase 1
CMV Cytomegalovirus
CNS Central nervous system
CoA Coenzyme A
Co-IP Co-immunoprecipitation
CYLD Cylindromatosis
DAPI 4’,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole
DEPC Diethylpyrocarbonate
DMEM Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium
DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid
DTT Dithiothreitol
E2F E2 transcription factor
Eco1 Establishment of cohesion 1
E. coli Escherichia coli
EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
EF1 Elongation factor 1
EGTA Ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid
ELP Elongator protein
F-actin Filamentous actin
FBS Fetal bovine serum
FOXO Forkhead box, class O
Gapdh Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
GCN5 General control of amino acid synthesis 5
GFP Green fluorescent protein
GI Gastrointestinal
GNAT Gcn5-related N-acetyltransfearse
GTP Guanosine-5’-triphosphate
HA Human influenza hemagglutinin
HAT Histone acetyltransferase
Hda3 Histone deacetylase 1
XIII
HDAC Histone deacetylase
H&E Hematoxyline and eosin
HEK 293 Human embryonic kidney 293 cell line
HeLa Human epithelial carcinoma cell line from a fatal cervical
carcinoma
HIV Human immunodeficiency virus
hnRNPA1 heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1
HRP Horseradish peroxidase
HSP Heat Shock Protein
IgG Immunoglobulin G
KAT Lysine acetyltransferase
KD Knockdown
KO Knockout
MAGED2 Melanoma-associated antigen D2
MAP Microtubule-associated protein
Mec17 C. elegans protein mechanosensory abnormality 17
MOZ Monocytic leukemia zinc finger protein
mRNA Messenger RNA
MS Mass spectrometry
MTOC Microtubule-organizing center
MYST MOZ, Ybf2/Sas3, SAS2, and Tip60
NAD Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
NAT1 N-acetyltransferase 1
NF-κB nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
NP-40 Nonyl phenoxypolyethoxylethanol-40
ORF Open reading frame
p300 E1A-associated protein of 300 kDa
p(A) Polyadenylation site
Pat Protein acetyltransferase
PBS Phosphate buffered saline
PCR Polymerase chain reaction
PFA Paraformaldehyde
PIPES Piperazine-N,N’-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)
PKA Protein kinase A
PMSF Phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride
pRB Retinoblastoma protein
PTM Post-translational modification
RhoGDI Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor
RNA Ribonucleic acid
Rpd3 Reduced potassium dependency 3
RT-PCR Reverse transcription-PCR
Rtt109 Fungal-specific regulator of ty1 transposition 109
Sas Something about silencing
Scc Sister chromatid cohesion
SDS-PAGE Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
S. enterica Salmonella enterica
XIV
SIRT2 Sirtuin 2
Smc Structural maintenance of chromosomes
SrtN Sirtuin
STAT Signal transducer and activator of transcription
TAF1 Transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 1
Tat Transactivator of transcription
TCA Tricarboxylic acid cycle
TFIID Transcription factor II D
T. thermophila Tetrahymena thermophila
TIF1β Transcription intermediary factor 1β
TIP Microtubule plus-end tracking protein
TTL Tubulin tyrosine ligase
TTLL TTL-like
TUBB4 Tubulin β4
WT Wild-type
1
Chapter I
Literature Review
2
1. Post-translational modifications
The genetic blueprint of life, DNA in the nucleus of eukaryotic cells, is
packaged into nucleosomes with histones, which together constitute a higher
structure called chromatin. Orchestrating the organization and the function of
chromatin is post-translational modifications (PTMs), which in turn regulate
differential gene expression. The impact of such PTMs is not only restricted in
chromatin-templated nuclear events but also is extended to manipulation of
cytoplasmic proteins. In cytoplasm, PTMs serve as one of the key mechanisms
that mediate intracellular signaling by shaping protein structure and regulating
protein function. A wide range of PTMs exists to meet distinct cellular demands
including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, glutamylation,
tyrosination, and acetylation, which together or alone form a sophisticated
network of protein dialogues. One emerging notion based on accumulating data is
that multisite modifications within a protein cooperate or compete with each other
in order to create a specific PTM code exerting certain cellular effects [1-4]. A
representative example is differential PTMs that occur on p53. It has been
observed that ubiquitination at lysine 370, 372, 373, 381, and 382 induces nuclear
export and subsequent proteasomal degradation of p53 [5]. Lysine 370, 372, and
382 are also subject to methylation, suggesting that these sites are competed by
different PTMs [4]. With such differential and multifaceted impacts on protein,
cells are required to retain tight regulation of PTMs in order to maintain cellular
homeostasis. Indeed, deregulated PTMs are often observed in many diseases, with
one exemplified by histone H4 hypo-acetylation at lysine 16 that serves as a
3
hallmark of cancer cells [6].
1.1 Cellular function of post-translational modifications
PTMs act by adding chemical moieties or peptides to one or more certain
amino acids of a protein, resulting in different protein function depending on the
type of PTMs. For example, initially identified in histones, acetylation results in
activation of gene expression by neutralizing the positive charge of a lysine
residue on core histone tails, thus disrupting the interaction of histones with DNA
and enabling transcription factors to have access to DNA. A number of cytosolic
proteins unambiguously have been witnessed to be regulated by phosphorylation,
which can turn on and off their activation. Proteins are targeted for degradation
upon getting tagged with poly-ubiquitin chains.
In addition, the net cellular results induced by a certain PTM also depend
on the amino acid site(s) on which it occurs. For example, mono-acetylation of
p53 at lysine 382 increases its affinity to the bromodomain of CREB-binding
protein (CBP) [4, 7], while di-acetylation of lysine 373 and 382 induces p53
association with the tandem bromodomains of TAF1, a TFIID subunit [4, 8].
Furthermore, certain protein domains recognize specific PTMs for the sequential
protein-protein interaction, thereby using PTMs as a docking site.
1.2 Lysine acetylation
Lysine acetylation refers to the transfer of an acetyl moiety from acetyl-
CoA to the ε-amino group of a lysine residue (Fig. 1). Because lysine acetylation
4
has been first discovered in histones in the 1960s [9], its role has long been
recognized to be associated with chromatin structure and transcriptional
regulation and thus extensively investigated in this regard. Along with the
sequential discovery of acetylated non-histone proteins, the recent proteomic
studies have widened the scope of lysine acetylation through the identification of
numerous acetylated proteins involved in a diverse array of cellular processes
including transcription, DNA repair, protein folding, and metabolism (Fig. 2) [10-
16]. Furthermore, a large number of acetylated proteins were found in different
bacterial species, indicating lysine acetylation as an evolutionarily conserved
mechanism. As such, lysine acetylation has begun to gain much attention as a
major PTM comparable to other major PTMs like phosphorylation.
2. Lysine acetyltransferases and deacetylases
Highly dynamic and reversible, lysine acetylation is governed by two
families of counteracting enzymes called lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) and
histone deacetylases (HDACs). Due to a historical reason, KATs and HDACs
were initially referred to histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and HDACs. Since the
nomenclature of these names is no longer precise based on the fact that these
enzymes affect acetylation of other non-histone proteins, HATs have been
renamed as KATs but the nomenclature of HDAC remained because it has already
become coherent [17]. Therefore, the acronyms, KAT and HDAC, will be used
herein.
5
2.1 Families of lysine acetyltransferases
Since the first discovery in the mid-1990s, the list of KATs has been
continuously increasing. KATs are mainly divided into three groups: GCN5-
related N-acetyltransferases (GNATs), MOZ, Ybf2/Sas3, Sas2, and Tip60 (MYST)
proteins, and the E1A-associated protein of 300 kDa (p300)/CBP. The recent
emergence of new KATs includes the fungal-specific regulator of ty1
transposition 109 (Rtt109), which exhibits structural similarity to p300 [18], and
Mec17 in C. elegans, which is related to Gcn5 [19]. Many of the KATs are found
as a catalytic subunit of multiprotein complexes and often conserved from yeast to
humans [20]. Compared to the large size of KATs found in eukaryotes, KATs in
bacteria are sparse in spite of the high number of acetylated proteins. Therefore,
potential KATs remain to be identified [21-22].
2.2 Histone deacetylase superfamily
There are two families of HDACs, which can be further divided into four
classes based on sequence homology and phylogenetic analysis [23]. The
Rpd3/Hda1 family is comprised of class I (HDAC1, 2, 3, and 8), IIa (HDAC4, 5,
7, and 9), IIb (HDAC6 and 10), and IV (HDAC11), while the sirtuin family
contains seven sirtuin members, comprising class III [24-26]. Class I HDACs are
homologous to yeast Rpd3 with class II HDACs related to Hda1. Class IV shows
similarities to both Rpd3 and Hda1. Whereas the mechanistic action of enzymes
belonging to the Rpd3/Hdac1 family requires Zn2+
, that of sirtuins is NAD+-
dependent (Fig. 1B). Like KATs, many HDACs are evolutionarily conserved from
6
yeast to humans.
2.3 Lysine acetylation in different cellular processes
As the diversity of proteins subject to undergo lysine acetylation expands
along with the number of acetylation sites, the scope of functional influence of
lysine acetylation in a cell has become enlarged accordingly (Fig. 2).
2.3.1 Lysine acetylation in chromatid cohesion complex
Coupled to DNA replication, adherence of the sister chromatids ensures
the genome integrity and proper chromosome segregation during cell division.
The cohesion establishment of the sister chromatids requires the cohesion
complex containing Smc1, Smc3 (two homologous ATPases), and Scc1 that
together form a ring-like structure [27]. Among the regulatory proteins that
associate with these proteins is Eco1, a GNAT-related KAT [27-29]. Via targeting
different substrates under certain cellular conditions, Eco1 results in distinct
functional consequences such as stabilization of the cohesion complex [28-30],
inhibition of the interaction of the cohesion complex with negative regulators [27-
28, 31-32], and maintenance of replication fork velocity [33]. For example, during
S-phase, Eco1 acetylates of Smc3, which leads to the stabilization of the cohesion
establishment. There are three evolutionarily conserved lysine residues in Smc3
(lysine 112, 113, and 931), two of which (lysine 112 and 113) cause cell lethality
due to severe defects in cohesion establishment of the sister chromatids when
mutated [28, 30]. Eco1 also targets Scc1 for acetylation upon DNA damage
7
during G2/M phase [34]. In response to DNA damage, Chk1 is activated and
subsequently phosphorylates Scc1 at serine 83. This phosphorylation triggers
Eco1 to acetylate Scc1 at lysine 84 and 210.
2.3.2 Lysine acetylation in metabolism
The recent investigation of the role of lysine acetylation beyond
transcriptional regulation led to identify a large number of proteins implicated in
metabolic processes. However, it was initially noticed in studies of acetyl-CoA
synthetase in S. enterica that acetylation might control metabolism. In S. enterica,
acetylation functions as a switch whereby acetylation of lysine 609 blocks the
catalytic activity of acetyl-CoA synthetase [35]. The responsible KAT and HDAC
were subsequently discovered to be Pat and CobB, which pushes and pulls to
maintain the catalytically inactive and active status of the enzyme, respectively.
Similar results were obtained from B. subtilis with AcuA identified as a KAT and
AcuC and SrtN as HDACs. Lysine 609 of acetyl-CoA synthetase is evolutionarily
conserved from bacteria to mammals, suggesting that this enzyme is regulated in
a similar manner in the mammalian system [36].
The proteome-wide analysis revealed the presence of lysine acetylation in
more than 50% of metabolic enzymes in E.coli [37-39]. Moreover, many enzymes
involved in glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, the
urea cycle, fatty acid metabolism, and glycogen metabolism in human liver
tissues were preferentially acetylated with acetylation having a direct impact on
the enzymatic activity or stability [16]. It was found that extracellular nutrient
8
availability changed the acetylation level of some metabolic enzymes, suggesting
that nutritional information in the environment is decoded in part by acetylation of
metabolic enzymes in order to produce a proper cellular response [39]. The
participation of lysine acetylation in metabolism is further witnessed by the
presence of acetylation in more than 20% of mitochondrial proteins [15, 40].
Although the functional importance of each individual acetylation event needs to
be elucidated, the extensive number of acetylated metabolic enzymes found in
both prokaryotes and humans indicates that lysine acetylation is evolutionarily
conserved mechanism from bacteria to humans in regulating metabolism.
2.3.3 Lysine acetylation in other cytoplasmic events
One of the prominent features of HDAC6 distinct from other HDACs is
the predominant cytoplasmic localization where HDAC6 acts on different
cytosolic proteins including cortactin, HSP90, and α-tubulin. It has been
demonstrated that acetylation of cortactin causes disruption of its interaction with
F-actin, affecting cell motility [41]. Similarly, HSP90 has been found to be
involved in HDAC6-dependent actin remodeling [42]. In addition, acetylation
status of HSP90 has an impact on its chaperone function [43]. Considering that
HSP90 chaperons proteins involved in nuclear receptors, protein kinases, and
small/micro RNA-containing silencing complexes, the influence of HSP90
acetylation may be more widespread [36].
9
3. Microtubules
Comprised of actin filaments, intermediate filaments, and microtubules,
the cytoskeleton forms a complex intracellular network that controls a multitude
of cellular function including biophysical integrity, morphology, motility, and life
cycle of the cell. Microtubules are found in a majority of eukaryotic cells and are
highly dynamic, thus exist heterogeneously in length. This dynamic nature of
microtubules is conferred by rapid cycling of polymerization and
depolymerization, allowing microtubules to expedite various cellular requests.
The basic building block of microtubules is a heteromer containing α- and
β-tubulins. These monomeric proteins associate with each other in a head-to-tail
manner to form a heteromer, which assembles laterally to further form a hollow
cylindrical tube. In cilia, tubulins assemble as heterodimers whereas in centrioles
and basal bodies, they form into heterotrimers. The microtubule polymers are
polarized stemming from the microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) with plus-
ends exploring throughout the cytoplasm. Microtubule minus-ends can be also
polarized in vitro, but they mostly reside in a stable or depolarizing state.
3.1 Microtubule regulation
Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) interact with microtubules to
regulate microtubule dynamics and organization. The most heavily studied
microtubule-stabilizing MAPs are tau, MAP2, and MAP4. There are also
microtubule-destabilizing MAPs, which function either by severing or by
depolarizing the microtubule lattice, such as spastin and katanin. Another group of
10
MAPs is the microtubule plus-end tracking proteins (TIPs). They track and
stabilize the plus-ends of microtubules that extend towards the leading edge of a
cell and control the interaction of microtubules with other organelles and
subcellular domains [44]. In addition, microtubule motor proteins constitute an
important frame for the regulation of microtubule function, particularly in
intracellular trafficking by generating force while associated with microtubules.
The two major groups of microtubule motor proteins are kinesins and dyneins.
Apart from MAPs and microtubule motor proteins, another emerging
regulator of microtubule function are PTMs that act in a sole or combinatorial
manner to generate a specific molecular signature on microtubules. Different
types of PTMs are known to occur on tubulins, including de/tyrosination,
glutamylation, glycylation, and acetylation. These tubulin PTMs occur not only
post-translationally, but also post-polymerized. In spite of the vigorous research,
there is no coherent evidence for tubulin modifications directly linking to
microtubule dynamics or stability. Although PTMs themselves may directly
mediate microtubule function by modulating microtubule structure, it was also
suggested that certain PTMs mark for the recruitment of MAPs and affect the
interaction with the motor proteins. For example, tau, MAP1B, and MAP2 have
higher affinity towards moderately poly-glutamylated tubulins, whereas MAP1A
optimally binds to heavily poly-glutamylated tubulins [45]. Likewise, lysine 40
acetylation of α-tubulin was observed to affect the binding to p58, a MAP
involved in microtubule interaction with the Golgi membrane [45-46].
11
3.2 α-Tubulin modifications
The tubulin PTMs preferentially occur on tubulin subunits that have
already been incorporated into the polymers, with the exception of β-tubulin
phosphoryation at serine 172 on unpolymerized tubulins in mitotic cells [45]. An
accumulating number of reports point to a notion that PTMs establish a ‘tubulin
code’. In a manner highly similar to the postulated histone code, where specific
recognition of histone modification recruits other proteins [2, 4], the tubulin code
hypothesizes that MAPs or motor proteins decode and interpret differential PTMs
of tubulins to dictate microtubule-based function [45]. Moreover, certain PTMs
are evolutionarily conserved and mark subpopulations of microtubules [45].
3.2.1 Poly-glutamylation and poly-glycylation
Compared to other PTMs that add only a single moiety, glutamylation
and glycylation add chains of glutamate and glycine residues varied in length to
the C-terminus of tubulins. The enzyme responsible for poly-glutamylation, the
poly-glutamylase, has been initially identified in brain and found to exist as a
catalytic subunit in a multiprotein complex with TTL-like 1 (TTLL1) [47].
Sequential investigations have found that all tubulin glutamylases [48-50] and
glycylases [51-53] comprise the TTLL family. The functional impact of poly-
glutamylation and poly-glycylation has been associated with microtubule stability
[54] and regulation of motor proteins [55-56].
12
3.2.2 Tyrosination and detyrosination
The C-terminus of α-tubulin contains tyrosines, which can be removed
and re-attached to α-tubulin [57-58]. Tyrosination of α-tubulin is usually found in
dynamic microtubules [59]. Although the enzyme that tyrosynates α-tubulin,
tubulin tyrosine ligase (TTL), has been identified, the counteracting enzyme that
detyrosynates α-tubulin remains elusive [60]. Tyrosination of α-tubulin has been
found to play a role in recruiting proteins that regulate microtubule dynamics [60].
3.2.3 Acetylation
The acetylation of lysine 40 on α-tubulin was the second tubulin PTM
discovered after α-tubulin tyrosination [61-62] and initially found in the flagella
of Chlamydomonas [62-63]. Whereas most of the α-tubulin PTMs decorate the C-
terminus of α-tubulin located on the outer surface of the microtubule shaft,
acetylation is predicted to occur on the luminal side of microtubules [64].
Acetylated lysine 40 of α-tubulin is known to be distributed in microtubules of
specific cellular domains, including the cytoplasmic network, centrioles, and
axonemes of cilia and flagella [45, 65-67].
3.3 Lysine acetyltransferases and deacetylases of α-tubulin
HDAC6 has been discovered as the first deacetylase of α-tubulin. Both in
vitro and in vivo analysis firmly established that HDAC6 deacetylates lysine 40 of
α-tubulin [68-69] and Hdac6 deficiency in mice leads to α-tubulin hyper-
acetylation in many tissues [70]. Nonetheless, the role of HDAC6 and acetylation
13
of α-tubulin in the microtubule stability and dynamics remain unclear and is hotly
debated. Although several research groups suggested that microtubule stability is
not influenced by α-tubulin acetylation [71-72], the initial hypothesis was that
acetylation of α-tubulin confers microtubules more stable [73]. This was
supported by the observation that over-expression of HDAC6 increased
chemotactic cell motility and that neuronal growth cones and the leading edges of
fibroblast are devoid of acetylated microtubules [69]. Irrespective of whether or
not HDAC6 directs microtubule stability, it is still surprising that Hdac6 KO mice
are viable and grow normally without any obvious phenotype except mild
developmental defects [70], given that acetylated α-tubulin is present in several
important organelles and that HDAC6 affects acetylation levels of other cytosolic
proteins, as mentioned previously.
The second enzyme suggested to deacetylate α-tubulin was SIRT2 [74].
Interestingly, co-immunoprecipitation suggested that SIRT2 interacts with
HDAC6, suggesting their interdependency [74]. However, it was shown that the
acetylation of α-tubulin is not affected in mouse embryonic fibroblasts [70] and in
brain tissues [75] of Sirt2 KO mice, indicating HDAC6 as a major deacetylase of
α-tubulin.
Despite of the discovery of HDAC6 as the α-tubulin deacetylase about a
decade ago [69, 74, 76], the identity of the corresponding acetyltransferase had
long remained elusive until recently. During this blackout period, several proteins
were shown to affect acetylation of α-tubulin including, ARD1-NAT1 [77], ELP3
complex [78], and GCN5 [79]. However, recent investigations of the proteins
14
required for the maintenance of C. elegans touch receptor neurons led to the
identification of Mec17 (C. elegans homolog of Atat1, α-tubulin
acetyltransferase). Through a series of in vitro and in vivo analysis using
Tetrahymena, C. elegans, zebrafish, and HeLa cells, Mec17 was shown to be the
bona-fide α-tubulin acetyltransferase (Fig. 3) [19]. Related to the Gcn5 family
proteins, Mec17 homologs exist in most eukaryotes excluding fungi and plants
[19]. Interestingly, several recent reports in the past few months suggested that by
acetylating α-tubulin at lysine 40, Mec17 increases cohesion between tubulin
subunits and therefore promotes microtubule stabilization [80-81].
4. Physiological roles of acetylated lysine 40 of α-tubulin
It has been established that long-lived microtubules found in ciliary
axonemes, neurons, and migrating cells contain acetylated α-tubulin at lysine 40.
Although acetylation of α-tubulin is not significantly required for survival of
lower organisms [82-83], it was suggested that vertebrates are more sensitive to
the loss of acetylated lysine 40 of α-tubulin [19, 84].
4.1 Acetylated α-tubulin in primary cilia
The role of α-tubulin acetylation in ciliary assembly and resorption was
initially overlooked based on the observation that a non-acetylable form of α-
tubulin (lysine 40 mutated to arginine) did not affect cilia in T. thermophila [83].
However, an increasing number of data suggest that acetylation of α-tubulin at
lysine 40 may play an important role in mammalian primary cilia. AurA, which is
15
required for cilia resorption in Chlamydomonas flagella, also promoted resorption
of the primary cilia in the human retinal pigmental epithelial cell line [85-87]. In
vitro studies have shown that HDAC6 interacts with and is regulated by AurA and
HDAC6 inhibition leads to reduced resorption of primary cilia [87]. Interestingly,
ATAT1 was found to be required for normal kinetics of cilium assembly in
mammalian cells [84], consistent with HDAC6 implicated in cilium disassembly.
Although acetylated lysine 40 of α-tubulin was abundant in zebrafish cilia [88],
Atat1 KD still exhibited lysine 40 acetylation to some degree, suggesting the
presence of another putative α-tubulin acetyltransferase in zebrafish cilia [19]
4.2 Acetylated α-tubulin in intracellular trafficking
It has been well documented that α-tubulin acetylation is important for
intracellular trafficking. The first evidence arose from the co-localization of
HDAC6 with the dynein-dynactin microtubule motor complex, p150glued
,
suggesting acetylation as a potential means to regulate motor-based cargo
transport [69]. In line with this, α-tubulin acetylation elevated the velocity of
kinesin-1 and enhanced the affinity to microtubules in the presence of other PTMs.
Pharmacological inhibition of HDAC6 produced a higher rate of kinesin-1 cargo
protein transport [89] and facilitated anterograde and retrograde transport of
vesicles containing brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in neurons [90].
Furthermore, HDAC6 has been shown to play a role in the recruitment of
misfolded proteins onto dynein motors for their transport to aggresomes [91] and
in autophagic degradation of misfolded α-syn aggregates [92]. Together, it is
16
suggested that acetylation of α-tubulin is crucial for neurological processes,
possibly leading to neuropathogenesis such as Parkinson’s disease when
deregulated. Indeed, HDAC6 was identified as an essential factor for the
degradation of aggregated huntington [93].
4.3 Acetylated α-tubulin in the central nervous system (CNS)
A recent study revealed that HDAC6 is expressed specifically at the tip of
an axon, regulating the development of the axonal initial segment and axonal
growth rate by modulating microtubule behavior [94]. In fact, acetylated α-tubulin
is non-uniformly distributed and enriched in the proximal site of the axon and
present less in the cell body and growth cone [95-96].
Interestingly, HDAC6 is implicated in emotional behavior of mice [97]. A
variety of behavioral tests applied to Hdac6 KO mice revealed that these mice are
hyper-active and less depressed. These phenotypes concur with abundant HDAC6
expression in serotonergic neurons in the dorsal and median raphe nuclei, which
regulate emotional behaviors. In addition, deletion of Mec17 in C. elegans and
zebrafish exhibited reduced touch responsiveness along with neuromuscular
defects, supporting the importance of α-tubulin acetylation in the CNS function
[19].
4.4 HDAC6 in cell cycle control and cancer
In the effort to generate the expression profiling of estrogen-responsive
genes using cDNA microarray, HDAC6 was found to be implicated in
17
tumorigenesis, cell proliferation, and cell cycle [98]. A tumor-suppressor gene,
CYLD constitutively was co-localized with acetylated microtubules in the
perinuclear region, where it inhibits HDAC6 resulting in reduced rate of
cytokinesis and a delay in the G1/S phase transition [99]. In addition, HDAC6
over-expression has been observed in many cancer cell lines and mouse tumor
models. For example, HDAC6 is proposed to induce anchorage-independent
proliferation and cell motility and plays an important role in maintaining
transformed phenotypes [100-101]. Since microtubules are highly implicated in
obtaining cellular motility, deregulated acetylation of α-tubulin may serve as one
of the intracellular mechanisms that lead to acquisition of invasive nature of
cancer cells.
18
5. Rationale for the thesis research project
Since it was first discovered in the mid-1980s, the in-depth investigation
of acetylated α-tubulin at lysine 40 has been delayed partially due to the
undefined status of the responsible enzymes. With HDAC6 identified as the α-
tubulin deacetylase in the early 2000s, several reports have been recently made on
the identification of responsible acetyltransferases, including ARD1-NAT1 [77],
ELP3 [78], and GCN5 [79]. This raises the question whether there are multiple α-
tubulin acetyltransferases. Related to this, Mec17 was shown to be the bona-fide
acetyltransferase of α-tubulin in C. elegans [19, 84]. Although this recent
discovery determined the physiological impact of Atat1 in lower organisms
including C. elegans [19], the in vivo function of this enzyme has not been
examined in mammals such as mice and humans. In my thesis project, I have
employed in vitro approaches to unmask other potential substrates of ATAT1,
which may elucidate the intracellular influence of ATAT1 beyond acetylating α-
tubulin. In addition, by using mice that lack Atat1, I have also demonstrated that
Atat1 is an authentic acetyltransferase of α-tubulin dispensable for mouse
development. These findings will provide an important foundation for interpreting
the impact of α-tubulin PTMs in mammals.
19
6. Figures and Legends
20
Figure 1. (A) The opposing actions of a KAT and an HDAC. A KAT catalyzes the
transfer of an acetyl group (boxed in light green) from acetyl-CoA onto the ε-
amino group of a lysine residue. Conversely, an HDAC hydrolyzes the acetylated
lysine residue to remove the acetyl group from a substrate, releasing acetate. (B)
Deacetylation by sirtuins. Different from other HDACs which are Zn2+
-dependent,
sirtuins mediate deacetylation from an acetylated lysine residue using NAD+. This
figure is derived from Kim et al [36].
21
22
Figure 2. Substrate diversity of lysine acetylation. Although initially discovered
on histones, lysine acetylation has been identified in a variety of proteins with
different function. Not only found in eukaryotes, lysine acetylation is known to
occur in many prokaryotes, suggesting it is an evolutionarily conserved
mechanism across various species. Recent proteomic studies have shown that
lysine acetylation is highly implicated in metabolism, indicating lysine acetylation
as a potential mechanism of metabolic regulation [15, 36]. Ac in a circle denotes
acetylation.
23
24
Figure 3. ATAT1 is a bona-fide acetyltransferase of α-tubulin. (A to C)
Immunofluorescent images of Mec17 WT (two entities on the left side) and KO
(arrowed) Tetrahymena show that the Mec17 KO animal is devoid of acetylated α-
tubulin at lysine 40. (D) In vitro acetylation assay using recombinant ATAT1.
ATAT1 efficiently acetylates α-tubulin shown by Western blotting (top) and by
phosphor-imaging (middle). (E to H) Acetylated lysine 40 (acetyl-K40) of α-
tubulin is significantly decreased in zebrafish embryos injected with ATG-MEF17
morpholinos (F and H) compared to the control embryos (E and G). The boxed
area shown in E and F are enlarged in G and H at higher magnifications. All of
these figures are adopted from Akella et al [19], except D, which is derived from
Shida et al [84].
25
7. References
1. Kouzarides, T. (2007) Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell
128, 693-705
2. Ruthenburg, A. J., Li, H., Patel, D. J., and Allis, C. D. (2007) Multivalent
engagement of chromatin modifications by linked binding modules. Nat
Rev Mol Cell Biol 8, 983-994
3. Turner, B. M. (2007) Defining an epigenetic code. Nat Cell Biol 9, 2-6
4. Yang, X. J., and Seto, E. (2008) Lysine acetylation: codified crosstalk
with other posttranslational modifications. Mol Cell 31, 449-461
5. Brooks, C. L., and Gu, W. (2003) Ubiquitination, phosphorylation and
acetylation: the molecular basis for p53 regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol
15, 164-171
6. Vaquero, A., Sternglanz, R., and Reinberg, D. (2007) NAD+-dependent
deacetylation of H4 lysine 16 by class III HDACs. Oncogene 26, 5505-
5520
7. Mujtaba, S., He, Y., Zeng, L., Yan, S., Plotnikova, O., Sachchidanand,
Sanchez, R., Zeleznik-Le, N. J., Ronai, Z., and Zhou, M. M. (2004)
Structural mechanism of the bromodomain of the coactivator CBP in p53
transcriptional activation. Mol Cell 13, 251-263
8. Li, A. G., Piluso, L. G., Cai, X., Gadd, B. J., Ladurner, A. G., and Liu, X.
(2007) An acetylation switch in p53 mediates holo-TFIID recruitment.
Mol Cell 28, 408-421
9. Allfrey, V. G., Faulkner, R., and Mirsky, A. E. (1964) Acetylation and
Methylation of Histones and Their Possible Role in the Regulation of Rna
Synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 51, 786-794
10. Imhof, A., Yang, X. J., Ogryzko, V. V., Nakatani, Y., Wolffe, A. P., and Ge,
H. (1997) Acetylation of general transcription factors by histone
acetyltransferases. Curr Biol 7, 689-692
11. Choi, C. H., Hiromura, M., and Usheva, A. (2003) Transcription factor IIB
acetylates itself to regulate transcription. Nature 424, 965-969
12. Tini, M., Benecke, A., Um, S. J., Torchia, J., Evans, R. M., and Chambon,
P. (2002) Association of CBP/p300 acetylase and thymine DNA
glycosylase links DNA repair and transcription. Mol Cell 9, 265-277
13. Yang, X. J., and Seto, E. (2007) HATs and HDACs: from structure,
function and regulation to novel strategies for therapy and prevention.
Oncogene 26, 5310-5318
14. Choudhary, C., Kumar, C., Gnad, F., Nielsen, M. L., Rehman, M., Walther,
T. C., Olsen, J. V., and Mann, M. (2009) Lysine acetylation targets protein
complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science 325, 834-
840
15. Kim, S. C., Sprung, R., Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Ball, H., Pei, J., Cheng, T., Kho,
Y., Xiao, H., Xiao, L., Grishin, N. V., White, M., Yang, X. J., and Zhao, Y.
(2006) Substrate and functional diversity of lysine acetylation revealed by
a proteomics survey. Mol Cell 23, 607-618
16. Zhao, S., Xu, W., Jiang, W., Yu, W., Lin, Y., Zhang, T., Yao, J., Zhou, L.,
26
Zeng, Y., Li, H., Li, Y., Shi, J., An, W., Hancock, S. M., He, F., Qin, L.,
Chin, J., Yang, P., Chen, X., Lei, Q., Xiong, Y., and Guan, K. L. (2010)
Regulation of cellular metabolism by protein lysine acetylation. Science
327, 1000-1004
17. Allis, C. D., Berger, S. L., Cote, J., Dent, S., Jenuwien, T., Kouzarides, T.,
Pillus, L., Reinberg, D., Shi, Y., Shiekhattar, R., Shilatifard, A., Workman,
J., and Zhang, Y. (2007) New nomenclature for chromatin-modifying
enzymes. Cell 131, 633-636
18. Schneider, J., Bajwa, P., Johnson, F. C., Bhaumik, S. R., and Shilatifard, A.
(2006) Rtt109 is required for proper H3K56 acetylation: a chromatin mark
associated with the elongating RNA polymerase II. J Biol Chem 281,
37270-37274
19. Akella, J. S., Wloga, D., Kim, J., Starostina, N. G., Lyons-Abbott, S.,
Morrissette, N. S., Dougan, S. T., Kipreos, E. T., and Gaertig, J. (2010)
MEC-17 is an alpha-tubulin acetyltransferase. Nature 467, 218-222
20. Lee, K. K., and Workman, J. L. (2007) Histone acetyltransferase
complexes: one size doesn't fit all. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8, 284-295
21. Starai, V. J., and Escalante-Semerena, J. C. (2004) Identification of the
protein acetyltransferase (Pat) enzyme that acetylates acetyl-CoA
synthetase in Salmonella enterica. J Mol Biol 340, 1005-1012
22. Gardner, J. G., Grundy, F. J., Henkin, T. M., and Escalante-Semerena, J. C.
(2006) Control of acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase (AcsA) activity by
acetylation/deacetylation without NAD(+) involvement in Bacillus subtilis.
J Bacteriol 188, 5460-5468
23. Gregoretti, I. V., Lee, Y. M., and Goodson, H. V. (2004) Molecular
evolution of the histone deacetylase family: functional implications of
phylogenetic analysis. J Mol Biol 338, 17-31
24. Yang, X. J., and Seto, E. (2008) The Rpd3/Hda1 family of lysine
deacetylases: from bacteria and yeast to mice and men. Nat Rev Mol Cell
Biol 9, 206-218
25. Sauve, A. A. (2010) Sirtuin chemical mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta
1804, 1591-1603
26. Walkinshaw, D. R., and Yang, X. J. (2008) Histone deacetylase inhibitors
as novel anticancer therapeutics. Curr Oncol 15, 237-243
27. Nasmyth, K., and Haering, C. H. (2009) Cohesin: its roles and
mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet 43, 525-558
28. Rolef Ben-Shahar, T., Heeger, S., Lehane, C., East, P., Flynn, H., Skehel,
M., and Uhlmann, F. (2008) Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation during
establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 321, 563-566
29. Zhang, J., Shi, X., Li, Y., Kim, B. J., Jia, J., Huang, Z., Yang, T., Fu, X.,
Jung, S. Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, P., Kim, S. T., Pan, X., and Qin, J. (2008)
Acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1 is required for S phase sister chromatid
cohesion in both human and yeast. Mol Cell 31, 143-151
30. Unal, E., Heidinger-Pauli, J. M., Kim, W., Guacci, V., Onn, I., Gygi, S. P.,
and Koshland, D. E. (2008) A molecular determinant for the establishment
of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 321, 566-569
27
31. Rowland, B. D., Roig, M. B., Nishino, T., Kurze, A., Uluocak, P., Mishra,
A., Beckouet, F., Underwood, P., Metson, J., Imre, R., Mechtler, K., Katis,
V. L., and Nasmyth, K. (2009) Building sister chromatid cohesion: smc3
acetylation counteracts an antiestablishment activity. Mol Cell 33, 763-774
32. Sutani, T., Kawaguchi, T., Kanno, R., Itoh, T., and Shirahige, K. (2009)
Budding yeast Wpl1(Rad61)-Pds5 complex counteracts sister chromatid
cohesion-establishing reaction. Curr Biol 19, 492-497
33. Terret, M. E., Sherwood, R., Rahman, S., Qin, J., and Jallepalli, P. V.
(2009) Cohesin acetylation speeds the replication fork. Nature 462, 231-
234
34. Heidinger-Pauli, J. M., Unal, E., and Koshland, D. (2009) Distinct targets
of the Eco1 acetyltransferase modulate cohesion in S phase and in
response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 34, 311-321
35. Starai, V. J., Celic, I., Cole, R. N., Boeke, J. D., and Escalante-Semerena, J.
C. (2002) Sir2-dependent activation of acetyl-CoA synthetase by
deacetylation of active lysine. Science 298, 2390-2392
36. Kim, G. W., and Yang, X. J. (2011) Comprehensive lysine acetylomes
emerging from bacteria to humans. Trends Biochem Sci 36, 211-220
37. Yu, B. J., Kim, J. A., Moon, J. H., Ryu, S. E., and Pan, J. G. (2008) The
diversity of lysine-acetylated proteins in Escherichia coli. J Microbiol
Biotechnol 18, 1529-1536
38. Zhang, J., Sprung, R., Pei, J., Tan, X., Kim, S., Zhu, H., Liu, C. F., Grishin,
N. V., and Zhao, Y. (2009) Lysine acetylation is a highly abundant and
evolutionarily conserved modification in Escherichia coli. Mol Cell
Proteomics 8, 215-225
39. Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Yang, C., Xiong, H., Lin, Y., Yao, J., Li, H., Xie, L.,
Zhao, W., Yao, Y., Ning, Z. B., Zeng, R., Xiong, Y., Guan, K. L., Zhao, S.,
and Zhao, G. P. (2010) Acetylation of metabolic enzymes coordinates
carbon source utilization and metabolic flux. Science 327, 1004-1007
40. Lombard, D. B., Alt, F. W., Cheng, H. L., Bunkenborg, J., Streeper, R. S.,
Mostoslavsky, R., Kim, J., Yancopoulos, G., Valenzuela, D., Murphy, A.,
Yang, Y., Chen, Y., Hirschey, M. D., Bronson, R. T., Haigis, M., Guarente,
L. P., Farese, R. V., Jr., Weissman, S., Verdin, E., and Schwer, B. (2007)
Mammalian Sir2 homolog SIRT3 regulates global mitochondrial lysine
acetylation. Mol Cell Biol 27, 8807-8814
41. Zhang, X., Yuan, Z., Zhang, Y., Yong, S., Salas-Burgos, A., Koomen, J.,
Olashaw, N., Parsons, J. T., Yang, X. J., Dent, S. R., Yao, T. P., Lane, W. S.,
and Seto, E. (2007) HDAC6 modulates cell motility by altering the
acetylation level of cortactin. Mol Cell 27, 197-213
42. Gao, Y. S., Hubbert, C. C., Lu, J., Lee, Y. S., Lee, J. Y., and Yao, T. P.
(2007) Histone deacetylase 6 regulates growth factor-induced actin
remodeling and endocytosis. Mol Cell Biol 27, 8637-8647
43. Bali, P., Pranpat, M., Bradner, J., Balasis, M., Fiskus, W., Guo, F., Rocha,
K., Kumaraswamy, S., Boyapalle, S., Atadja, P., Seto, E., and Bhalla, K.
(2005) Inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 acetylates and disrupts the
chaperone function of heat shock protein 90: a novel basis for
28
antileukemia activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Biol Chem 280,
26729-26734
44. Janke, C., and Bulinski, J. C. (2011) Post-translational regulation of the
microtubule cytoskeleton: mechanisms and functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell
Biol 12, 773-786
45. Verhey, K. J., and Gaertig, J. (2007) The tubulin code. Cell Cycle 6, 2152-
2160
46. Haggarty, S. J., Koeller, K. M., Wong, J. C., Grozinger, C. M., and
Schreiber, S. L. (2003) Domain-selective small-molecule inhibitor of
histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-mediated tubulin deacetylation. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 100, 4389-4394
47. Janke, C., Rogowski, K., Wloga, D., Regnard, C., Kajava, A. V., Strub, J.
M., Temurak, N., van Dijk, J., Boucher, D., van Dorsselaer, A.,
Suryavanshi, S., Gaertig, J., and Edde, B. (2005) Tubulin polyglutamylase
enzymes are members of the TTL domain protein family. Science 308,
1758-1762
48. Ikegami, K., Horigome, D., Mukai, M., Livnat, I., MacGregor, G. R., and
Setou, M. (2008) TTLL10 is a protein polyglycylase that can modify
nucleosome assembly protein 1. FEBS Lett 582, 1129-1134
49. Ikegami, K., Mukai, M., Tsuchida, J., Heier, R. L., Macgregor, G. R., and
Setou, M. (2006) TTLL7 is a mammalian beta-tubulin polyglutamylase
required for growth of MAP2-positive neurites. J Biol Chem 281, 30707-
30716
50. van Dijk, J., Rogowski, K., Miro, J., Lacroix, B., Edde, B., and Janke, C.
(2007) A targeted multienzyme mechanism for selective microtubule
polyglutamylation. Mol Cell 26, 437-448
51. Rogowski, K., Juge, F., van Dijk, J., Wloga, D., Strub, J. M., Levilliers, N.,
Thomas, D., Bre, M. H., Van Dorsselaer, A., Gaertig, J., and Janke, C.
(2009) Evolutionary divergence of enzymatic mechanisms for
posttranslational polyglycylation. Cell 137, 1076-1087
52. Wloga, D., Webster, D. M., Rogowski, K., Bre, M. H., Levilliers, N.,
Jerka-Dziadosz, M., Janke, C., Dougan, S. T., and Gaertig, J. (2009)
TTLL3 Is a tubulin glycine ligase that regulates the assembly of cilia. Dev
Cell 16, 867-876
53. Ikegami, K., and Setou, M. (2009) TTLL10 can perform tubulin
glycylation when co-expressed with TTLL8. FEBS Lett 583, 1957-1963
54. Boucher, D., Larcher, J. C., Gros, F., and Denoulet, P. (1994)
Polyglutamylation of tubulin as a progressive regulator of in vitro
interactions between the microtubule-associated protein Tau and tubulin.
Biochemistry 33, 12471-12477
55. Suryavanshi, S., Edde, B., Fox, L. A., Guerrero, S., Hard, R., Hennessey,
T., Kabi, A., Malison, D., Pennock, D., Sale, W. S., Wloga, D., and
Gaertig, J. (2010) Tubulin glutamylation regulates ciliary motility by
altering inner dynein arm activity. Curr Biol 20, 435-440
56. Kubo, T., Yanagisawa, H. A., Yagi, T., Hirono, M., and Kamiya, R. (2010)
Tubulin polyglutamylation regulates axonemal motility by modulating
29
activities of inner-arm dyneins. Curr Biol 20, 441-445
57. Hallak, M. E., Rodriguez, J. A., Barra, H. S., and Caputto, R. (1977)
Release of tyrosine from tyrosinated tubulin. Some common factors that
affect this process and the assembly of tubulin. FEBS Lett 73, 147-150
58. Valenzuela, P., Quiroga, M., Zaldivar, J., Rutter, W. J., Kirschner, M. W.,
and Cleveland, D. W. (1981) Nucleotide and corresponding amino acid
sequences encoded by alpha and beta tubulin mRNAs. Nature 289, 650-
655
59. Webster, D. R., Gundersen, G. G., Bulinski, J. C., and Borisy, G. G. (1987)
Differential turnover of tyrosinated and detyrosinated microtubules. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 84, 9040-9044
60. Garnham, C. P., and Roll-Mecak, A. (2012) The chemical complexity of
cellular microtubules: Tubulin post-translational modification enzymes
and their roles in tuning microtubule functions. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)
61. Arce, C. A., Rodriguez, J. A., Barra, H. S., and Caputo, R. (1975)
Incorporation of L-tyrosine, L-phenylalanine and L-3,4-
dihydroxyphenylalanine as single units into rat brain tubulin. Eur J
Biochem 59, 145-149
62. L'Hernault, S. W., and Rosenbaum, J. L. (1985) Chlamydomonas alpha-
tubulin is posttranslationally modified by acetylation on the epsilon-amino
group of a lysine. Biochemistry 24, 473-478
63. Greer, K., Maruta, H., L'Hernault, S. W., and Rosenbaum, J. L. (1985)
Alpha-tubulin acetylase activity in isolated Chlamydomonas flagella. J
Cell Biol 101, 2081-2084
64. L'Hernault, S. W., and Rosenbaum, J. L. (1983) Chlamydomonas alpha-
tubulin is posttranslationally modified in the flagella during flagellar
assembly. J Cell Biol 97, 258-263
65. Wloga, D., and Gaertig, J. (2010) Post-translational modifications of
microtubules. J Cell Sci 123, 3447-3455
66. Piperno, G., and Fuller, M. T. (1985) Monoclonal antibodies specific for
an acetylated form of alpha-tubulin recognize the antigen in cilia and
flagella from a variety of organisms. J Cell Biol 101, 2085-2094
67. Friedman, J. R., Webster, B. M., Mastronarde, D. N., Verhey, K. J., and
Voeltz, G. K. (2010) ER sliding dynamics and ER-mitochondrial contacts
occur on acetylated microtubules. J Cell Biol 190, 363-375
68. Zhang, Y., Li, N., Caron, C., Matthias, G., Hess, D., Khochbin, S., and
Matthias, P. (2003) HDAC-6 interacts with and deacetylates tubulin and
microtubules in vivo. EMBO J 22, 1168-1179
69. Hubbert, C., Guardiola, A., Shao, R., Kawaguchi, Y., Ito, A., Nixon, A.,
Yoshida, M., Wang, X. F., and Yao, T. P. (2002) HDAC6 is a microtubule-
associated deacetylase. Nature 417, 455-458
70. Zhang, Y., Kwon, S., Yamaguchi, T., Cubizolles, F., Rousseaux, S.,
Kneissel, M., Cao, C., Li, N., Cheng, H. L., Chua, K., Lombard, D.,
Mizeracki, A., Matthias, G., Alt, F. W., Khochbin, S., and Matthias, P.
(2008) Mice lacking histone deacetylase 6 have hyperacetylated tubulin
but are viable and develop normally. Mol Cell Biol 28, 1688-1701
30
71. Palazzo, A., Ackerman, B., and Gundersen, G. G. (2003) Cell biology:
Tubulin acetylation and cell motility. Nature 421, 230
72. Zilberman, Y., Ballestrem, C., Carramusa, L., Mazitschek, R., Khochbin,
S., and Bershadsky, A. (2009) Regulation of microtubule dynamics by
inhibition of the tubulin deacetylase HDAC6. J Cell Sci 122, 3531-3541
73. Piperno, G., LeDizet, M., and Chang, X. J. (1987) Microtubules
containing acetylated alpha-tubulin in mammalian cells in culture. J Cell
Biol 104, 289-302
74. North, B. J., Marshall, B. L., Borra, M. T., Denu, J. M., and Verdin, E.
(2003) The human Sir2 ortholog, SIRT2, is an NAD+-dependent tubulin
deacetylase. Mol Cell 11, 437-444
75. Bobrowska, A., Donmez, G., Weiss, A., Guarente, L., and Bates, G. (2012)
SIRT2 ablation has no effect on tubulin acetylation in brain, cholesterol
biosynthesis or the progression of Huntington's disease phenotypes in vivo.
PLoS One 7, e34805
76. Matsuyama, A., Shimazu, T., Sumida, Y., Saito, A., Yoshimatsu, Y.,
Seigneurin-Berny, D., Osada, H., Komatsu, Y., Nishino, N., Khochbin, S.,
Horinouchi, S., and Yoshida, M. (2002) In vivo destabilization of dynamic
microtubules by HDAC6-mediated deacetylation. EMBO J 21, 6820-6831
77. Ohkawa, N., Sugisaki, S., Tokunaga, E., Fujitani, K., Hayasaka, T., Setou,
M., and Inokuchi, K. (2008) N-acetyltransferase ARD1-NAT1 regulates
neuronal dendritic development. Genes Cells 13, 1171-1183
78. Creppe, C., Malinouskaya, L., Volvert, M. L., Gillard, M., Close, P.,
Malaise, O., Laguesse, S., Cornez, I., Rahmouni, S., Ormenese, S.,
Belachew, S., Malgrange, B., Chapelle, J. P., Siebenlist, U., Moonen, G.,
Chariot, A., and Nguyen, L. (2009) Elongator controls the migration and
differentiation of cortical neurons through acetylation of alpha-tubulin.
Cell 136, 551-564
79. Conacci-Sorrell, M., Ngouenet, C., and Eisenman, R. N. (2010) Myc-nick:
a cytoplasmic cleavage product of Myc that promotes alpha-tubulin
acetylation and cell differentiation. Cell 142, 480-493
80. Gaertig, J., and Wloga, D. (2012) Microtubules: MEC-17 Moonlights in
the Lumen. Curr Biol 22, R483-485
81. Topalidou, I., Keller, C., Kalebic, N., Nguyen, K. C., Somhegyi, H., Politi,
K. A., Heppenstall, P., Hall, D. H., and Chalfie, M. (2012) Genetically
Separable Functions of the MEC-17 Tubulin Acetyltransferase Affect
Microtubule Organization. Curr Biol 22, 1057-1065
82. Kozminski, K. G., Diener, D. R., and Rosenbaum, J. L. (1993) High level
expression of nonacetylatable alpha-tubulin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 25, 158-170
83. Gaertig, J., Cruz, M. A., Bowen, J., Gu, L., Pennock, D. G., and Gorovsky,
M. A. (1995) Acetylation of lysine 40 in alpha-tubulin is not essential in
Tetrahymena thermophila. J Cell Biol 129, 1301-1310
84. Shida, T., Cueva, J. G., Xu, Z., Goodman, M. B., and Nachury, M. V.
(2010) The major alpha-tubulin K40 acetyltransferase alphaTAT1
promotes rapid ciliogenesis and efficient mechanosensation. Proc Natl
31
Acad Sci U S A 107, 21517-21522
85. Pan, J., Wang, Q., and Snell, W. J. (2004) An aurora kinase is essential for
flagellar disassembly in Chlamydomonas. Dev Cell 6, 445-451
86. Gaertig, J., and Wloga, D. (2008) Ciliary tubulin and its post-translational
modifications. Curr Top Dev Biol 85, 83-113
87. Pugacheva, E. N., Jablonski, S. A., Hartman, T. R., Henske, E. P., and
Golemis, E. A. (2007) HEF1-dependent Aurora A activation induces
disassembly of the primary cilium. Cell 129, 1351-1363
88. Sun, Z., Amsterdam, A., Pazour, G. J., Cole, D. G., Miller, M. S., and
Hopkins, N. (2004) A genetic screen in zebrafish identifies cilia genes as a
principal cause of cystic kidney. Development 131, 4085-4093
89. Reed, N. A., Cai, D., Blasius, T. L., Jih, G. T., Meyhofer, E., Gaertig, J.,
and Verhey, K. J. (2006) Microtubule acetylation promotes kinesin-1
binding and transport. Curr Biol 16, 2166-2172
90. Dompierre, J. P., Godin, J. D., Charrin, B. C., Cordelieres, F. P., King, S. J.,
Humbert, S., and Saudou, F. (2007) Histone deacetylase 6 inhibition
compensates for the transport deficit in Huntington's disease by increasing
tubulin acetylation. J Neurosci 27, 3571-3583
91. Kawaguchi, Y., Kovacs, J. J., McLaurin, A., Vance, J. M., Ito, A., and Yao,
T. P. (2003) The deacetylase HDAC6 regulates aggresome formation and
cell viability in response to misfolded protein stress. Cell 115, 727-738
92. Su, M., Shi, J. J., Yang, Y. P., Li, J., Zhang, Y. L., Chen, J., Hu, L. F., and
Liu, C. F. (2011) HDAC6 regulates aggresome-autophagy degradation
pathway of alpha-synuclein in response to MPP+-induced stress. J
Neurochem 117, 112-120
93. Iwata, A., Riley, B. E., Johnston, J. A., and Kopito, R. R. (2005) HDAC6
and microtubules are required for autophagic degradation of aggregated
huntingtin. J Biol Chem 280, 40282-40292
94. Tapia, M., Wandosell, F., and Garrido, J. J. (2010) Impaired function of
HDAC6 slows down axonal growth and interferes with axon initial
segment development. PLoS One 5, e12908
95. Baas, P. W., and Black, M. M. (1990) Individual microtubules in the axon
consist of domains that differ in both composition and stability. J Cell Biol
111, 495-509
96. Fukushima, N., Furuta, D., Hidaka, Y., Moriyama, R., and Tsujiuchi, T.
(2009) Post-translational modifications of tubulin in the nervous system. J
Neurochem 109, 683-693
97. Fukada, M., Hanai, A., Nakayama, A., Suzuki, T., Miyata, N., Rodriguiz,
R. M., Wetsel, W. C., Yao, T. P., and Kawaguchi, Y. (2012) Loss of
deacetylation activity of Hdac6 affects emotional behavior in mice. PLoS
One 7, e30924
98. Inoue, A., Yoshida, N., Omoto, Y., Oguchi, S., Yamori, T., Kiyama, R., and
Hayashi, S. (2002) Development of cDNA microarray for expression
profiling of estrogen-responsive genes. J Mol Endocrinol 29, 175-192
99. Wickstrom, S. A., Masoumi, K. C., Khochbin, S., Fassler, R., and
Massoumi, R. (2010) CYLD negatively regulates cell-cycle progression
32
by inactivating HDAC6 and increasing the levels of acetylated tubulin.
EMBO J 29, 131-144
100. Aldana-Masangkay, G. I., and Sakamoto, K. M. (2011) The role of
HDAC6 in cancer. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011, 875824
101. Perdiz, D., Mackeh, R., Pous, C., and Baillet, A. (2011) The ins and outs
of tubulin acetylation: more than just a post-translational modification?
Cell Signal 23, 763-771
33
Chapter II
Identification of Atat1 as a major alpha-
tubulin acetyltransferase dispensable for
mouse development
34
1. ABSTRACT
Proteomic studies in the past few years have suggested lysine acetylation
as one major post-translational modification influencing thousands of proteins
involved in diverse cellular function inside various organisms ranging from
bacteria to humans. Among such proteins that are affected by lysine acetylation is
α-tubulin, a subunit of microtubules that serve as a cytoskeletal component along
with actin filaments and intermediate filaments. Lysine acetylation of α-tubulin
occurs at lysine 40 as a major site and is unique among other α-tubulin post-
translational modifications for two reasons: 1) α-tubulin is one of the first
acetylated proteins identified in the mid-1980s and 2) this acetylation occurs on
the luminal side of microtubules. With the responsible deacetylase discovered to
be HDAC6 about a decade ago, the counteracting acetyltransferase had long
awaited discovery until recently. Although several acetyltransferases have been
shown to affect the acetylation of α-tubulin, including ARD1-NAT1, ELP3, and
GCN5, Atat1 was demonstrated to be the bona-fide acetyltransferase of α-tubulin
in C. elegans. An important question is whether this is also the case in vivo in
mammalian systems. By using mice devoid of Atat1, I set out to determine the
physiological importance of Atat1 and α-tubulin acetylation in mice. Here, I show
that Atat1 is an authentic acetyltransferase of α-tubulin at lysine 40 in most of the
tissues examined in mice but the loss of Atat1 is not detrimental to mouse
development. In addition, through a set of proteomic and molecular studies, I
have identified ATAT1 as a potential interaction partner of other proteins in
addition to α-tubulin.
35
2. INTRODUCTION
Post-translational modifications are an important cellular mechanism that
affects protein structure and function in addition to their own intrinsic properties.
Among various other post-translational modifications, lysine acetylation has
emerged as a major modification comparable to phosphorylation [1-3]. The
importance of lysine acetylation initially arose from its relation with chromatin
organization and its consecutive impact on gene expression. However, it is now
clear that the spectrum of lysine acetylation is broader than initially anticipated,
comprising not only nuclear events but also a diversity of other cytoplasmic
processes. Lysine acetylation is catalyzed by two groups of counteracting
enzymes called lysine (K) acetyltransferases (KATs) and histone deacetylases
(HDACs). Although the nomenclature HDAC is longer accurate due to the
substrate diversity of the enzymes, it will be used herein for a historical reason [4].
According to the sequence homology and structural similarity, KATs are mainly
grouped into three families [5] and HDACs are divided into four classes (class I to
IV). Whereas HDACs in class I, II, and IV are Zn2+
-dependent, sirtuins in class III
require NAD+ for reaction.
One of the acetylated proteins discovered about three decades ago is α-
tubulin, an important subunit of microtubules that comprise the cytoskeleton
along with actin filaments and intermediate filaments. By structural analysis,
acetylation of α-tubulin is predicted to occur on the luminal side of microtubules
at lysine 40 which serves as a major site. A body of evidences has linked α-tubulin
acetylation to microtubules in specific organelles, including the cytoplasmic
36
network, centrioles, and axonemes of cilia and flagella [6-9]. In 2002, HDAC6
was discovered to be the α-tubulin deacetylase [10] and the subsequent study
confirmed that Hdac6 KO mice show global hyper-acetylation of α-tubulin in
various tissues [11]. Another HDAC that had been suggested to deacetylate α-
tubulin was SIRT2 [12]. However, genetic deletion of Sirt2 in mice did not affect
acetylation of α-tubulin [11, 13], indicating HDAC6 as the major deacetylase of
α-tubulin. Interestingly, in spite of unique and crucial function, mice devoid of
Hdac6 were viable and fertile [11] and did not produce any obvious phenotype
except anti-depressant like characteristics [14].
Due to veiled discovery of the α-tubulin acetyltransferase, ablation of α-
tubulin acetylation was simulated by mutation of the lysine 40 residue (changed to
arginine). However, in lower organisms such as Tetrahymena and
Chlamydomonas, lysine 40 mutation had no impact on survival [15-16]. In the
past few years, several acetyltransferases have been shown to affect the
acetylation of α-tubulin, including ARD1-NAT1 [17], ELP3 [18-19], and GCN5
[20]. Creppe et al. showed that ELP3, a multisubunit KAT, regulates the migration
of cortical neurons in the developing mouse brain through acetylating α-tubulin
[19]. In the consecutive year, another group suggested that Gcn5 is recruited by
Myc-nick, a cytoplasmic form of Myc, and acetylates α-tubulin [20]. However, by
an array of biochemical and cell-based approaches, it was demonstrated that
Mec17, the C. elegans homolog of α-tubulin acetyltransferase 1 (Atat1), is the
bona-fide α-tubulin acetyltransferase that acts on lysine 40. The following lines of
evidence support this finding. Firstly, ATAT1 exclusively acetylates lysine 40 of
37
α-tubulin in vitro and is necessary and sufficient for acetylation of α-tubulin at
lysine 40 in mammalian cells [21]. Secondly, genetic disruption of Atat1
phenocopies the α-tubulin mutation at lysine 40 in Tetrahymena [22]. Thirdly, the
induction of ATAT1 efficiently leads to acetylation of α-tubulin in cells devoid of
acetylated α-tubulin, while ELP3 fails to do so [21].
Though the recent discovery of ATAT1 provided important insights into
the function of α-tubulin acetylation in several organisms [21-22], the analysis of
Atat1 in mammals has not been examined yet. Here, by using mice deficient of
Atat1 by genetic deletion, we demonstrate that Atat1 is a major α-tubulin
acetyltransferase dispensable for mouse development. We also show that Atat1 is
robustly expressed in testis, renal pelvis, gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and
hippocampus in mice, yet the development of these tissues appears normal in the
absence of Atat1. Furthermore, through proteomic and molecular analyses, we
suggest that Atat1 may have other substrates in addition to α-tubulin.
38
3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture
Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK 293) cells were cultured in
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Invitrogen) supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen).
Cell transfection
Cells were seeded in a 12-well plate at a density of 0.04 X 106 cells/well,
or in a 6 cm-dish at 0.15 X 106 cells/dish. Transfection was performed using 1.5
µL of lipofectamin (Invitrogen) for 12-well plates with 1.5 µg of DNA or 6 µL for
6 cm-dishes with 5 µg of DNA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The
GFP-HDAC6 plasmid construct, whose usage has been published in Bertos et al
[23], was used here.
Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)
HEK 293 cells were seeded and transfected in 6 cm-dishes as described
above. The plasmids bearing a FLAG epitope were used as baits and either HA-
or GFP-tagged plasmids were expressed as preys in the same cells. 48 hours of
post-transfection, cells were washed with 3 mL of 1X PBS and lysed with 600 µL
of buffer K (20 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0, 150 mM potassium chloride, 30
mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.1 % NP-40, 50 mM EDTA, 10 mM sodium fluoride,
0.1 mM sodium vanadate, and protease inhibitor cocktail including pepstatin,
aprotinin,, leupeptin, and PMSF) on ice. Cell lysates were harvested in microtubes
39
and sonicated for 5 sec at setting 5 with subsequent rotation for 30 min at 4℃.
Meanwhile, 250 µL of M2 agarose beads (for seven 6 cm-dishes) were washed
twice with 300 µL of buffer K. The beads were added with 500 µL of buffer K
and aliquoted 100 µL to each microtube placed on ice. After 30 min of rotation,
the cell lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 6 min. 50 µL of cell lysates
was kept for input and the rest was poured to the washed beads. Cell lysate/bead
mixture was left rotated in the microtubes for 4 hours and processed for four times
of washing. Proteins were eluted in 35 µL of buffer K containing 3.5 µL of FLAG
peptide and further rotated for 45 min at 4℃. The eluants were collected and kept
at -80℃. The input and purified eluants were analyzed by Western blotting.
Luciferase-based reporter gene assay
The ORF of ATAT1 was subcloned to a vector containing a
DNA/promoter binding domain (Gal4) which controls the expression of the
luciferase reporter. For normalization control among different wells, β-
galactosidase (CMV-β-Gal) was co-transfected in HEK 293 cells in a 12-well
plate. 48 hours post-transfection, the subsequent procedures were performed.
Wash the cells twice with cold 1X PBS. Add 100 µL of lysis buffer (17 mM
KH2PO4, 18.3 mM K2HPO4, 1 % Triton X-100, 0.2 mM DTT, and 0.1 % glycerol).
Shake the plate for 10 min and collect the cell lysate in microtubes at 4℃. Spin at
14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4℃ and transfer the supernatant to new microtubes.
40
Transfer 20 µL of lysates to a flat-bottom 96-well white plate for luciferase
reading and add 20 µL of lysis buffer to the adjacent well as a control. 70 µL of
luciferin was added for luciferase reading. Transfer 5 µL of cell lysates for β-
galactosidase reading and add 5 µL of lysis buffer to the adjacent well as a control.
Mix 990 µL of Galacto Reaction Buffer Diluent and 10 µL of Galacto-plus
(Applied Biosystems). Add this reaction mix to each well for β-galactosidase
reading.
Animals
All the experimental procedures performed on mice were carried out
according to standard operating procedures created by the Veterinary Care
Subcommittee and approved by the University Animal Care Committee.
The mice used for this thesis project are on C57BL/6NTac background
and were housed in groups of one to five animals. Food and water were provided
ad libitum (Animal Care Services at Goodman Cancer Center Animal Facility).
All the mice that have been used for the experiments were 5-7 weeks old males,
unless indicated.
Mouse genotyping
Mice were genotyped by PCR with DNA extracted from ear punch. The
protocol for DNA extraction is as follows. After punching mouse ears, ear pieces
are immersed in 200 µL of 50 mM NaOH and incubated at 95℃ for 10 min. Add
20 µL of 1M Tris-HCl pH 6.8. Vortex samples for 7 sec. Centrifuge at 14,000
41
rpm for 6 min. Use 2 µL for PCR. Primer sequences for Atat1 and LacZ detection
are,
Atat-F1 (5’-ACTGAAGGACACCTCAGCCCGA-3’),
Atat-R1 (5’-TACCTCATTGTGAGCCTCCCGG-3’),
LacInF (5’-GGTAAACTGGCTCGGATTAGGG-3’) and,
LacInR (5’-TTGACTGTAGCGGCTGATGTTG-3’).
The PCR mixture was made with 5 µL of 2X GoTaq Green Master Mix
(Promega), 2 µL of DNA, 0.25 µL of 10 pM primers, and 2.5 µL of nuclease-free
water. Cycling conditions are as follows: 95℃ for 3 min, (95℃ for 30 sec, 50℃
for 30 sec, and 72℃ for 30 sec) X 30, followed by 2 min at 72℃. The PCR
product was kept at 4℃ afterwards.
RT-PCR
Tissues collected from the mice were rinsed in ice-cold PBS containing
0.1 % of DEPC and put in microtubes. Tissues were added to 200 µL of PBS
containing DEPC and crushed. 1 mL of Trizol (Invitrogen) was applied followed
by vortexing. Crushed tissues were then left at the room temperature for 5 min.
Samples were centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 10 min at 4℃ and the supernatant was
taken to new microtubes. 200 µL of chloroform was added to the supernatant and
mixed by shaking. Samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 13000 rpm and the
upper phase was taken and mixed well with 500 µL of isopropanol. Samples were
again centrifuged for 15 min at 13000 rpm. Isopropanol was removed carefully
42
and pellet was washed with 750 µL of 75 % ethanol in DEPC water. Following
the washing step with ethanol, pellet was air-dried and dissolved in an appropriate
amount of DEPC water. After quantification of RNA concentration, cDNA was
synthesized using QuantiTect Rev. Transcription kit (Qiagen) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was then performed using the synthesized
cDNA. The PCR cycling condition is identical to that for genotyping (the same
condition for Gapdh, too), but the reaction volume was adjusted to 25 µL
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers for Atat1 and LacZ are
indicated in the genotyping method section. Primer sequences for Gapdh are,
mGAPDH-RT01 (5’-GCA CAG TCA AGG CCG AGA AT-3’) and
mGAPDH-RT02 (5’- GCC TTC TCC ATG GTG GTG AA-3’).
Tissue preparation for SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
Tissues were weighted and homogenized with a pestle in 3 volumes of
RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1 % NP-40, 1 % sodium
deoxycholate, 0.1 % SDS, and a cocktail of protease inhibitors described in the
co-IP method section). Further homogenization was done by sonication at setting
5. After the centrifugation at 13000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was kept and
stored at -80℃. All these procedures were done on ice. Subsequently, protein
concentration was measured by Bradford assay.
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
Samples were diluted in 3X RSB SDS-PAGE loading buffer and
43
denatured in boiling water for 5 min. Proteins were loaded and ran in a 10 % SDS
polyacrylamide gel at 120 voltage (V) for 15 min and at 150 V until the blue dyes
are off the gel. Proteins were then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes at
200 mA for 3 hours at 4℃, using transfer apparatuses (Biorad). Membranes were
blocked for 1 hour with 5 % non-fat dried milk in PBS containing 0.15 % Tween-
20 (Sigma). Primary antibodies [anti-FLAG antibodies (Sigma) and anti-HA
antibodies (Covance) in 1:1000 dilution, anti-α-tubulin antibodies (Sigma) in
1:2500 dilution, and anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibodies (Sigma) in 1:10,000
dilution] were applied in the blocking solution overnight at 4℃. Blots were
washed five times for 8 min each in PBS containing 0.15 % Tween-20 and
incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG diluted in 1:5000 (GE healthcare
Life Sciences). For signal detection, chemi-luminescence solution (Pierce) and
hyperfilms (Denville) were used.
Whole-mount β-galactosidase staining of tissues or embryos
Mice were anesthetized and perfused transcardially first with PBS and
then with 2 % PFA in PBS. After perfusion is completed, tissues or embryos were
collected and fixed at 4℃ for 2-3 hours (up to 1 hour for embryos) in a fixative
containing 2 % PFA, 0.2 % glutaldehyde, 0.02 % NP-40, and 0.2 mM MgCl2 in
PBS. The fixative was then changed to detergent rinse (0.1 M phosphate buffer
pH 7.3, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01 % sodium deoxycholate, and 0.02 % NP-40). After 2
hours to overnight incubation in the detergent rinse (changed 3 to 5 times), the
44
whole-mount tissues or embryos were incubated in X-gal staining solution at 37℃
{detergent rinse containing 5 mM of K3[Fe(CN)6] and K4[Fe(CN)6], and 1 mg/ml
of X-gal} until the desired color is developed.
Preparation of frozen mouse tissue sections
Mice were anesthetized and sacrificed by cervical dislocation and
subsequent procedures were followed. Fix the tissues overnight in 4 % PFA in
PBS at 4℃. The next morning, equilibrate in 15 % sucrose in PBS at 4℃ for
about 8 hours. Equilibrate in 30 % sucrose in PBS at 4℃ overnight. Equilibrate
further in OCT (Tissue-Tek) for 30 min at 4℃. Embed in OCT with careful
consideration of orientation and quick-freeze on dry-ice. Store blocks at -80℃. 30
min prior to sectioning, place blocks in a styrofoam box containing dry-ice at a
-20℃ freezer. Section cryostat blocks 10-30 µm onto slides. Air-dry and store the
slides at -80℃.
β-galactosidase staining of frozen sections
Sections were post-fixed in a fixative (0.2 % PFA in 0.1 M PIPES buffer
pH. 6.9, 2 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM EGTA) on ice for 10 min and rinsed in PBS
with 2 mM MgCl2, followed by washing in the same solution for 10 min. Sections
were then permeabilized in detergent rinse on ice for 10 min. After staining at 37℃
45
in the dark (up to overnight), the slides were washed three times in PBS with 2
mM MgCl2 at room temperature for 5 min, followed by washing in distilled water.
Counterstaining was carried out in nuclear fast red solution (Sigma), with
dehydration through a series of methanol (5 min each in 50 %, 70 %, and 100 %).
Sections were cleared in Histoclear (Diamed) for 5 min and mounted using a
mounting medium (American Master Tech).
Immunofluorescence
Sections were fixed in ice-cold acetone at -20℃ for 10 min and the
subsequent procedures were followed. Draw a circle with a PAP pen (Invitrogen)
around the tissue sections. Rinse with PBS three times for 5 min. Permeabilize
with IF buffer [PBS containing 0.2 % Triton X-100 (Biorad) and 0.05 % Tween-
20] for 30 min. Incubate in blocking solution [IF buffer with 2% bovine serum
albumin (Sigma)] for 1 hour. Incubate with the primary antibodies (anti-α-tubulin
antibodies in 1:500 dilution and anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibodies in 1:1000
dilution) for 3 hours. Wash three times with IF buffer. From the next step on, all
the procedures were carried out in the dark. Incubate with the secondary
antibodies [Alexa fluor-labeled anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen)] for 1 hour. Wash
three times with IF buffer. Incubate in PBS containing DAPI (0.5 ng/mL) for 5
min with subsequent washing in distilled water. Mount using a mounting medium
(Thermo Scientific).
46
4. RESULTS
Perhaps due to the recent identification, little has been defined about
other roles of ATAT1 besides acetylation of α-tubulin. So, here we have employed
a set of in vitro experiments to explore other potential function (if any) of ATAT1.
The putative substrates of ATAT1 suggested by mass spectrometry (MS)
Although it was well established by previous in vitro and in vivo data that
α-tubulin is a faithful substrate of ATAT1 [21-22], it is possible that ATAT1 has
impact on the acetylation status of other proteins, given that the counteracting
enzyme, HDAC6 acts on other cytosolic proteins in addition to α-tubulin. To
survey the range of ATAT1 substrate diversity, mass spectrometry (MS) was
executed to find other potential targets of ATAT1 (Table 1). As expected, high
protein abundance of α-tubulin was observed.
We then explored to validate if the proteins listed in the MS data
physically associate with ATAT1. For this, co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) was
performed, followed by Western blotting. We tested some of the proteins listed in
the MS data (Fig. 1) using either ATAT1 or the candidate proteins as a FLAG-
tagged bait. p53 and 14-3-3 did not co-immunoprecipitate with ATAT1 (Fig. 1A),
suggesting that ATAT1 does not interact with these proteins. AKAP8 and
AKAP8L, the proteins that associate with regulatory subunit of PKA, were well
expressed but only AKAP8L was shown to bind to ATAT1 with much high affinity,
consistent with its MS output (Fig. 1A). Likewise, tubulin-β4 (TUBB4),
MAGED2 which is known as a negative regulator of p53 [24], and the
47
transcription intermediary factor 1β (TIF1B) were well associated with ATAT1 in
accordance with MS result (Fig. 1A and 1B). To our curiosity, we tested if there is
physical interaction between ATAT1 and HDAC6 and found that they do not bind
to each other (Fig. 1C). In summary, the verification of the MS data by co-IP
showed that ATAT1 may have other potential targets in addition to α-tubulin.
ATAT1 does not bind to the known HDAC6 substrates and their effector
Although not listed in the MS data, we set out to determine if the known
substrates of HDAC6 (cortactin and HSP90) and their effector (RAC1) bind to
ATAT1. Similar biochemical approaches using co-IP followed by Western blotting
were executed. As a result, ATAT1 did not co-immunoprecipitate with any of
these proteins (Fig. 2). This suggests that acetylation of cortactin, HSP90, and
RAC1 may be modulated by a KAT other than ATAT1 and therefore, ATAT1 may
not counteract with HDAC6 for these proteins.
ATAT1 is co-localized with BBS4, a cilium marker
Previous studies have demonstrated that acetylated α-tubulin is enriched
in ciliary microtubules [6, 9]. To investigate if ATAT1 is involved in cilia, we
examined whether ATAT1 is co-localized with a cilium marker, BBS4. GFP-
tagged ATAT1 was co-transfected with mCherry-tagged BBS4 in HEK 293 cells
and 48 hours of post-transfection, cells were observed under the fluorescence
microscope. As shown in Fig. 3Aa and 3Ab, ATAT1 was mostly localized to
cytoplasm and co-localized with BBS4 (Fig. 3Aa to Cb), suggesting a possible
48
role of ATAT1 in ciliary formation or maintenance. This is likely given that
ATAT1 is required for rapid ciliogenesis in mammalian cells [21] and that
enrichment of acetylated α-tubulin is found in cilia. The mutant ATAT1 construct
with only N-terminus, where the catalytic domain of ATAT1 is, produced similar
results observed with the WT construct (Fig. 3D to F). In contrast, the mutant
form of ATAT1 with only C-terminus, which does not exhibit homology to any
known domain, was mostly pan-cellular (Fig. 3G to I). Together, these results
show that ATAT1 is co-localized with BBS4 in HEK 293 cells and that this co-
localization is no longer observed when the catalytic domain is removed,
suggesting that the catalytic activity may play an important role in the subcellular
localization of ATAT1.
Transcriptional activity of ATAT1
In spite of its predominant localization in cytoplasm, HDAC6 affects
expression of several genes [25]. Thus, we set out to determine if ATAT1
possesses any transcriptional activity by the luciferase-based reporter gene assay.
For this, the luciferase reporter (Gal4-TK-Luc) and β-galactosidase reporter
(CMV-β-Gal) were co-transfected without ATAT1 or with an increasing amount of
an ATAT1 construct bearing a Gal4 DNA-binding domain. The luciferase activity
was measured and normalized by internal β-galactosidase activity to rule out any
possibility that the calculated reporter activity is due to differential transfection
efficiency. Upon the Gal4-Gal4 association, the luciferase is either transactivated
or inhibited depending on the transcriptional activity of ATAT1. As shown in Fig.
49
4, ATAT1 reduced the expression of the reporter gene and this effect was not dose-
dependent. Direct inhibitory action of ATAT1 is less likely in that it is
predominantly localized to the cytoplasm (shown in Fig. 3Aa and Ab). On the
other hand, ATAT1 may indirectly inhibit gene expression through acetylating
factors required for transcription, conferring the factor repressive to transcription.
In vivo analysis of mouse Atat1
KO animals are an absolute requirement to investigate in vivo function of
the gene of interest. We have obtained Atat1 KO mice from U.C. Davis
(KnockOut Mouse Project Repository) and maintained them.
Targeted deletion of Atat1 in mice
To determine the necessity of Atat1 in mice and to observe what roles
Atat1 plays at the physiological level, we used and examined mice in which Atat1
is genetically deleted in C57BL/6NTac background. These mice were generated
by gene trapping and tactical description is as follows (Fig. 5A). The targeting
vector (middle) with a gene trapping cassette containing a promoterless lacZ and a
selection marker flanked by a splice acceptor (SA) and a polyadenylation site
[p(A)] was targeted to the intron between exon 6 and exon 7 of the Atat1 (top)
gene by homologous recombination. The lacZ is expressed under the endogenous
promoter of Atat1 with the resulting gene product expressed as a fusion protein
with truncated and non-functional Atat1.
Heterozygous mice were mated to produce litters containing WT
50
(Atat1+/+
), heterozygous (Atat1+/-
), or homozygous KO (Atat1-/-
) mice. The
genotypes of mice were determined by PCR using DNA extracted from ear punch.
Mating between Atat1+/-
mice yielded mice with different genotypes at the
expected Mandelian ratio.
Overall, the Atat1-/-
mice were viable and did not produce any obvious
phenotype compared to their Atat1+/+
and Atat1+/-
littermates. Both male and
female Atat1-/-
mice were indistinguishable from their Atat1+/+
or Atat1+/-
littermates by gross examination. Genetic deletion of Atat1 did not affect the size
and the overall growth (Fig. 5B to F) and both Atat1+/-
and Atat1-/-
mice were
fertile. The viability and fertility of Atat1-/-
mice were somewhat expected in that
the abrogation of α-tubulin acetylation by mutating lysine 40 did not affect the
survival of Tetrahymena and Chlamydomonas. Also, Hdac6 KO mice were viable
and developed normally, suggesting that tight regulation of α-tubulin acetylation
is not an absolute requirement for normal growth.
To validate that these Atat1-/-
mice do not express Atat1, RNA from
different tissues in Atat1+/+
and Atat1-/-
mice was extracted and compared for the
mRNA levels of endogenous Atat1 and inserted lacZ reporter gene by RT-PCR.
As shown in Fig. 6A, the mRNA transcript of Atat1 was completely absent in the
Atat1-/-
mouse, while the lacZ reporter gene was expressed only in the Atat1-/-
mouse, confirming the accuracy of the genetic strategy.
Atat1 is a major acetyltransferase of α-tubulin in mice
To substantiate the genetic ablation of Atat1 at the functional level, we
51
extracted proteins from various tissues in Atat1+/+
and Atat1-/-
mice and
performed Western blotting using antibodies against α-tubulin or against
acetylated lysine 40 of α-tubulin. As shown in Fig. 6B, α-tubulin acetylation was
totally ablated in many tissues such as testis, kidney, liver, and brain in the Atat1-/-
mouse, while acetylation of histone H3 was not affected (data not shown).
Although acetylated α-tubulin was still observed in lung, spleen, and fat, it is
dramatically decreased in these tissues except fat. Taken together, these results
demonstrate that Atat1-/-
mice exhibit significant loss of acetylated α-tubulin,
indicating Atat1 as the major α-tubulin acetyltransferase. The presence of
acetylated α-tubulin in lung, spleen, and fat proposes the existence of another
putative acetyltransferase of α-tubulin. However, the significant decrease of α-
tubulin acetylation in these tissues (except fat) also reflects the minor role of the
putative acetyltransferase in acetylating α-tubulin. Whether it is Ard1-Nat1, Elp3,
or Gcn5 that is responsible for the retained acetylated α-tubulin in these tissues
remains to be determined.
ATAT1 is expressed ubiquitously in embryos
Taking advantage of the inserted lacZ reporter geneby the gene trapping
strategy (Fig. 5A) that reports the expression of Atat1, we next sought the
expression pattern of Atat1 during mouse embryonic development (Fig. 7). For
this, embryos at E10.75 and E13.5 were examined by whole-mount β-
galactosidase staining. Embryonic days were calculated according to the
convention that E0.5 corresponds to the morning of finding the copulation plug,
52
assuming mating occurred at midnight.
Gross examination of the Atat1 WT and KO embryos did not reveal any
developmental and morphological defect during this embryonic period. At both
E10.75 and E13.5, Atat1 is expressed ubiquitously throughout the embryos (Fig.
7A to D), with the spinal cord more intensely stained in the first place at E13.5
(data not shown). In summary, Atat1 deletion is not detrimental to mouse
embryonic development and Atat1 does not exhibit a specific expression pattern
but is rather expressed ubiquitously, suggesting that Atat1 may not play a vital
role during mouse embryonic development.
ATAT1 expression in adult mouse tissues
We then explored to obtain the global expression pattern of Atat1 in adult
mice. For this, we collected a variety of tissues from Atat1+/+
and Atat1-/-
mice
and performed whole-mount β-galactosidase staining. No sign of pathogenecity in
any tissue, such as tumor formation, was found in the Atat1-/-
mice and the size of
the tissues was similar between Atat1+/+
and Atat1-/-
mice by gross examination.
As shown in Fig. 8, the expression of Atat1 varied among different tissues, with
the testis, renal pelvis, GI tract (stomach, small intestine, and rectum), and brain,
having the most intense expression (Fig. 8A, B, H to J, and L to M respectively).
No expression of Atat1 was observed in spleen and heart (Fig. 8E and F,
respectively). In fact, the robust levels of Atat1 in the brain and the testis are
consistent with the previous finding that acetylated α-tubulin is associated with
stable, long-lived microtubules found in axons of neurons [26-29] and basal
53
bodies and axonemes of flagella [30-31]. Also, it has been reported that in
pathogenesis induced by C. difficile toxin A, the levels of acetylated α-tubulin are
decreased, leading to acute inflammation in intestine [32]. This suggests that α-
tubulin acetylation is required for normal function of the intestine and disrupted
acetylation of α-tubulin is implicated in intestinal pathogenesis, implying a
possible role of Atat1 in this tissue. Conversely, the high expression of Atat1 in
renal pelvis was surprising, but it is feasible that acetylation of α-tubulin serves
for primary cilia in kidney. Together, the robust expression of Atat1 in the testis,
renal pelvis, GI tract, and brain, and yet no obvious defects of these tissues upon
Atat1 deletion, suggests that Atat1 may play essential roles in these tissues under
certain conditions.
Atat1 expression in mouse brain and testis sections
We then explored to gain further insight into the Atat1 expression in these
tissues by histological methods. For this, brain and testis tissues were prepared in
frozen blocks and sectioned. β-galactosidase staining was performed to examine
where exactly Atat1 is expressed within these tissues.
Overall, tissue histology of the brain from the Atat1-/-
mouse appeared
normal (by H&E staining, data not shown). Expression pattern of Atat1 in the
brain seemed ubiquitous throughout all brain regions, as exemplified in the
cerebellum and the cerebral cortex (Fig. 9A to B, respectively). Interestingly,
specific and strong expression of Atat1 was detected in hippocampal regions (Fig.
9C), suggesting a potential role of Atat1 in the hippocampus.
54
In the testis, predominant expression of Atat1 was observed in a region
between the lumen and the basal lamina of the seminiferous tubule, where
spermatids and spematocytes reside (Fig. 10A to B). By immunofluorescence, we
observed that α-tubulin is present in almost every cell in the seminiferous tubules
localizing exclusively to the cytoplasm (Fig. 10C to E and I to K, in Atat1+/+
and
Atat1-/-
, respectively). However, acetylated α-tubulin seemed to be specific for
cells in the central region of the seminiferous tubules (Fig. 10F to H), consistent
with the expression pattern of Atat1 shown in Fig. 10B. This observation was
absent in the testis section of the Atat1-/-
mouse (Fig. 10L to N). The fluorescence
emanating from interstitium (areas between the seminiferous tubules) was found
as non-specific auto-fluorescence since the negative control (immunofluorescent
staining without the primary antibody incubation) also exhibits signal in these
regions (data not shown). Together, these results suggest that Atat1 and acetylated
α-tubulin are presumably present in spermatids and spermatocytes located in the
central region of the seminiferous tubules of adult mouse testis. However, further
validation using specific markers of spermatids and spermatocytes will
complement these findings and the identification of the specific role of Atat1 in
these cells requires other functional assays.
55
5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Other potential targets of Atat1 in addition to α-tubulin – Although
previous studies firmly established that Atat1 faithfully acetylates α-tubulin, we
took a further step to find other potential substrates of ATAT1. Through MS
analysis and validation by co-IP, we determined that α-tubulin may not be the
only substrate of ATAT1. Indeed, we identified AKAP8L, TUBB4, MAGED2, and
TIF1B as the potential interaction partners of ATAT1. Because we selected some
of the proteins listed in the MS result, it is possible that more interaction partners
of ATAT1 exist. With these ATAT1 binding proteins at hand, there are two
questions to be addressed: 1) does acetylation actually occur on these proteins?
and 2) if it does, how does it affect the function of these proteins? Elucidation of
these two issues will reveal how ATAT1 exerts its effect in the cell in addition to
acetylating α-tubulin. We also showed that ATAT1 does not interact with the
known substrates of HDAC6 and their effector, suggesting that another KAT
counteracts with HDAC6 over the acetylation status of these proteins.
Possible roles of ATAT1 in cilia - Among the organelles associated with
acetylated α-tubulin, we tested if ATAT1 is implicated in cilia by looking at BBS4
and its co-localization with ATAT1. We observed that ATAT1 is mostly expressed
in the cytoplasm and co-localized with BBS4. Mammalian cells require and
produce primary cilia under certain extracellular conditions in order to sense the
environmental changes through intracellular signaling. Though our results are
only preliminary, based on the fact that cilia are formed of acetylated microtubule
bundles and that acetylation of α-tubulin is implicated in kinetics of ciliogenesis
56
[21], the possibility of ATAT1 involvement in dynamics of ciliary microtubules is
highly feasible.
Transcriptional activity of ATAT1 - BLAST search to find functional
domain(s) of ATAT1 beside the GCN5-like acetyltransferase domain in the N-
terminus did not yield any known functional domain, suggesting that acetylation
is a primary function of ATAT1. However, as a method to predict any
transcriptional activity of ATAT1, we took advantage of the luciferase-based
reporter gene assay and showed that ATAT1 down-regulates luciferase expression.
Although this could be due to a direct effect of ATAT1, it is more likely that
ATAT1 indirectly mediates down-regulation of transcription by acetylating other
putative proteins which are capable of binding to Gal4 DNA-binding domain for
two reasons. First, ATAT1 is predominantly localized in cytoplasm. Second, one
of the candidate substrates of ATAT1 found in the MS data and co-IP is TIF1B, a
protein involved in transcription. In both cases, it is interesting to observe the
inhibitory effect of ATAT1 on transcription since HDAC6 also has impact on
transcription of several genes [25].
Viability of Atat1-/-
mice – We showed that Atat1-/-
mice exhibit significant
loss of acetylated α-tubulin at lysine 40 in a majority of tissues. However, Atat1-/-
mice did not produce any obvious phenotypes or defects. These mice were viable,
fertile, and healthy like their WT littermates. These results were somewhat
anticipated based on the viability and normal development of Hdac6 KO mice
[11]. To date, our oldest Atat1-/-
mice (around 5 months-old by 2012 August) have
not exhibited any obvious physical or behavioral abnormalities compared to their
57
WT littermates. Nonetheless, we cannot preclude the possibility that Atat1 plays
important function in later stages of life and/or under certain conditions. For
example, a critical part of the treatment for spinal cord injury depends on axon
regeneration and appropriate synapse formation. Indeed, there have been several
reports, which implicated microtubule stabilization in facilitating axon
regeneration [33-34]. Because our results showed that Atat1 is the only α-tubulin
acetyltransferase in brain (Fig. 6B) and is highly expressed in the CNS (Fig. 8K to
M and Fig. 9) and it was previously reported that Atat1, as well as acetylated α-
tubulin, is involved in microtubule stabilization [35-38], Atat1 may be a key target
to treat spinal cord injuries. HDAC6 over-expression observed in many cancer
cell lines also implicates deregulated acetylation of α-tubulin in cancer.
Furthermore, decreased levels of acetylated α-tubulin in response to intestinal
inflammation induced by C. difficile toxin A support the idea that acetylation of α-
tubulin plays a critical role under pathogenic conditions [32].
Atat1 in microtubule stabilization – Recent studies showed that Atat1
functions to maintain microtubule architecture [35-36]. In touch receptor neurons
of C. elegans that lack Mec17, fewer and shorter microtubules were present and
more strikingly, these microtubules were varied in protofilament number both
between and within microtubules [35-36]. Mec17 increased the cohesion between
tubulin subunits in the microtubule lattice and constrained the protofilament
number by acetylating lysine 40 of α-tubulin. The absence of Mec17 resulted in
reduced cohesion and destabilization of the microtubules, suggesting that lysine
40 acetylation of α-tubulin by Mec17 provides mechanical assistance to
58
microtubule integrity. Whether similar observations are acquired in cells derived
from Atat1-/-
mice remains to be determined and will provide an important insight
into the precise role of α-tubulin acetylation in mammals.
Histological examination of Atat1 - To detect any subtle change in tissues
where Atat1 is highly expressed, histological examination was employed and
showed that Atat1 is highly and specifically expressed in the mouse hippocampus
(Fig. 8M and 9C). The hippocampus is well known as a region of the brain
responsible for processing spatial memory and navigation, and therefore, the
robust expression of Atat1 suggests that Atat1 may be involved in these
neurological processes and subsequent brain function. Although not performed
here, applying various behavioral tests to the Atat1-/-
mice such as the Morris
water maze, which tests spatial learning and memory, will help determine if
deficiency of Atat1 leads to any defect in hippocampal function. In the testis,
Atat1 was expressed presumably in the spermatids and spermatocytes located in
the central region of the seminiferous tubules (Fig. 10B). This expression pattern
was consistent with the immunofluorescent image obtained with antibodies
against acetylated lysine 40 of α-tubulin, suggesting that Atat1 may regulate the
acetylation of α-tubulin at lysine 40 in these cells (Fig. 10H). Indeed, our Western
blotting result (Fig. 6B), showed Atat1 as the sole α-tubulin acetyltransferase in
the testis. Although possible roles of acetylated α-tubulin in positioning and
orientation of spermatogonia in the porcine testis have been reported, the exact
function of Atat1 in spermatids and spermatocytes of the mouse testis remains to
be discovered. Histological analysis of other tissues such as renal pelvis and GI
59
tract will also shed light on of finding physiological implication of Atat1 and of
acetylated α-tubulin.
Conclusion – We have demonstrated that Atat1 is an authentic
acetyltransferase of α-tubulin in a majority of tissues in mice with a potential to
acetylate other substrates in addition to α-tubulin. This is the first demonstration
that Atat1 is a bona-fide α-tubulin acetyltransferase in mammals. Viability of the
Atat1-/-
mice suggests that the loss of Atat1 is not detrimental to mouse
development. Though Atat1 is highly expressed in the testis, renal pelvis, GI tract,
and the hippocampus, normal development of these tissues is achieved in the
absence of Atat1 and therefore, further functional and behavioral analysis should
follow to elucidate whether Atat1 plays an important role in these tissues under
certain conditions. Given the importance of microtubule regulation in a diverse
range of physiological processes, the results found herein will be an important
framework for documenting the physiological impact of α-tubulin PTMs.
60
6. ILLUSTRATIONS
Table 1. Mass spectral counts of proteins associated with ATAT1. MS was done
using recombinant FLAG-tagged ATAT1 as a bait and shows that α-tubulin is a
faithful substrate of ATAT1 as previously reported. Other listed proteins were
validated for their physical association with ATAT1 by co-IP in the following
figures.
61
62
Figure 1. Validation of MS analysis by co-IP. Proteins listed in the MS result
were subject to co-IP to confirm their physical interaction with ATAT1. Stronger
bands of FLAG-tagged proteins in the immunoprecipitated samples indicate
concentrated amount of the proteins. (A) As accordance with the MS data,
AKAP8L, TUBB4, and MAGED2, well associated with ATAT1. However, p53
and 14-3-3 did not associate with ATAT1. Bars along the right side of the figure
indicate the size of the proteins. (B) TIFIB is also validated to interact with, and
therefore, suggested to be a potential target of ATAT1. (C) HDAC6 does not
physically interact with ATAT1. The light band (on the right side of the figure)
shown at the bottom is a heavy chain contamination of FLAG-tagged antibodies
that are attached to M2 beads.
63
64
Figure 2. The known substrates of HDAC6 (cortactin and Hsp90) and their
effector protein (Rac1) do not co-immunoprecipitate with ATAT1, suggesting
absence of their interaction with ATAT1. This result also suggests that acetylation
of these proteins is not modulated by ATAT1 and therefore, HDAC6 counteracts
with another acetyltransferase over these proteins. N-ATAT1 is the ATAT1 mutant
containing only N-terminal region. The asterisks denote heavy chain
contamination of FLAG-tagged antibodies that are attached to M2 beads.
65
66
Figure 3. BBS4 is co-localized with ATAT1. GFP-tagged WT or mutant
constructs of ATAT1 were co-transfected in HEK 293 cells with mCherry-tagged
BBS4, a cilium marker. In most of the cases, only WT (Aa to Cb) and the mutant
containing only N-terminal part of ATAT1 (D to F), and not the mutant containing
only C-terminal part of ATAT1 (G to I), were co-localized with BBS4.
67
Figure 4. Transcriptional activity of ATAT1. ATAT1 (Gal4-ATAT1) has an
inhibitory effect on the luciferase expression (Gal4-SV40-Luc) in a dose-
independent manner. In all cases, CMV-β-galactosidase was co-expressed as an
internal control.
68
69
70
Figure 5. Targeted deletion of Atat1 in mice. (A) Genetic strategy of generating
Atat1-/-
mice. The targeting vector (in the middle) was inserted into the intron
between exon 6 and 7 by homologous recombination. The gene trapping cassette
in the targeting vector contains a promoterless lacZ and a selection marker (h-
UBC promoter-neor) flanked by a splice acceptor (SA) and polyadenylation sites
[p(A)]. Due to the p(A) site just downstream of the LacZ gene, the final gene
product, which is truncated and non-functional, is expressed as a fusion protein
with β-gal. (B to E) Atat1-/-
mice appear normal and are indistinguishable from
their WT littermates by gross examination. (F) Atat1+/+
(WT), Atat1+/-
(heterozygous), and Atat1-/-
(KO) littermate male mice were weighted weekly and
showed no obvious difference in gaining weight and overall growth. Each graph
figure represents an individual litter, with averaged weight of mice having the
same genotype.
71
72
Figure 6. Atat1 is the major acetyltransferase of α-tubulin at lysine 40 in mice. (A)
The genetic strategy of generating Atat1-/-
mice was confirmed by RT-PCR. No
mRNA of Atat1 was detected in the Atat1-/-
mouse, whereas the mRNA expression
of the inserted LacZ gene was expressed only in the Atat1-/-
mouse. (B) Protein
extracted from various tissues of Atat1+/+
and Atat1-/-
mice was subject to Western
blotting using antibodies against α-tubulin (left) or antibodies specifically against
acetylated lysine 40 of α-tubulin (right). In a majority of tissues, Atat1 deficiency
led to absence or significant decrease of acetylated lysine 40 of α-tubulin,
indicating that Atat1 is the major acetyltransferase of α-tubulin.
73
Figure 7. Expression of Atat1 in mouse embryos. At both E10.75 (A to B) and
E13.5 (C to D), Atat1 is expressed ubiquitously throughout the embryos. Atat1-/-
embryos do not show any morphological defect, suggesting that Atat1 is not an
absolute requirement for normal embryonic development.
74
75
76
Figure 8. Expression of Atat1 in adult mouse tissues. Atat1 in (A) testis, (B)
kidney, (C) liver, (D) lung, (E) spleen, (F) heart, (G) pancreas, (H) stomach, (I)
small intestine, (J) rectum, (K) spinal cord, (L) sagitally cut brain, and (M)
coronally cut brain are shown following β-galactosidase staining. Strong
expression of Atat1 is observed in the testis, GI tract, and brain, as well as renal
pelvis.
77
Figure 9. β-galactosidase staining on frozen sections of Atat1+/+
and Atat1-/-
mouse brain. Though Atat1 was expressed uniformly throughout all brain regions
including (A) cerebellum and (B) cerebral cortex, specifically high expression of
Atat1 was detected in hippocampus (C).
78
79
Figure 10. Frozen sections of Atat1+/+
and Atat1-/-
mouse testis. (A to B) β-
galactosidase staining shows that Atat1 is mostly expressed in a central layer of
seminiferous tubule. (C to E, and I to K, respectively) Immunofluorescence using
anti-α-tubulin antibodies on Atat1+/+
and Atat1-/-
testis sections shows α-tubulin
present in almost every cell in the seminiferous tubules, localizing exclusively in
cytoplasm. Immunofluorescent staining with antibodies against acetylated lysine
40 of α-tubulin (F to H) shows specific localization of acetylated α-tubulin in the
central region of the seminiferous tubules, consistent with the Atat1 expression
shown in (B). This is no longer observed on the testis section of the Atat1-/-
mouse
(L to N).
80
7. REFERENCES
1. Choudhary, C., Kumar, C., Gnad, F., Nielsen, M. L., Rehman, M., Walther,
T. C., Olsen, J. V., and Mann, M. (2009) Lysine acetylation targets protein
complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science 325, 834-
840
2. Kim, G. W., and Yang, X. J. (2011) Comprehensive lysine acetylomes
emerging from bacteria to humans. Trends Biochem Sci 36, 211-220
3. Zhang, J., Sprung, R., Pei, J., Tan, X., Kim, S., Zhu, H., Liu, C. F., Grishin,
N. V., and Zhao, Y. (2009) Lysine acetylation is a highly abundant and
evolutionarily conserved modification in Escherichia coli. Mol Cell
Proteomics 8, 215-225
4. Allis, C. D., Berger, S. L., Cote, J., Dent, S., Jenuwien, T., Kouzarides, T.,
Pillus, L., Reinberg, D., Shi, Y., Shiekhattar, R., Shilatifard, A., Workman,
J., and Zhang, Y. (2007) New nomenclature for chromatin-modifying
enzymes. Cell 131, 633-636
5. Lee, K. K., and Workman, J. L. (2007) Histone acetyltransferase
complexes: one size doesn't fit all. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8, 284-295
6. Leroux, M. R. (2010) Tubulin acetyltransferase discovered: ciliary role in
the ancestral eukaryote expanded to neurons in metazoans. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A 107, 21238-21239
7. Friedman, J. R., Webster, B. M., Mastronarde, D. N., Verhey, K. J., and
Voeltz, G. K. (2010) ER sliding dynamics and ER-mitochondrial contacts
occur on acetylated microtubules. J Cell Biol 190, 363-375
8. Balashova, E. E., Lokhov, P. G., and Bystrevskaia, V. B. (2009) [The
pattern of centriole immunostaining for tyrosinated or acetylated alpha-
tubulin changes during mitosis in 3T3 (A31) cells but not in SV40-3T3
cells]. Tsitologiia 51, 511-519
9. Piperno, G., LeDizet, M., and Chang, X. J. (1987) Microtubules
containing acetylated alpha-tubulin in mammalian cells in culture. J Cell
Biol 104, 289-302
10. Hubbert, C., Guardiola, A., Shao, R., Kawaguchi, Y., Ito, A., Nixon, A.,
Yoshida, M., Wang, X. F., and Yao, T. P. (2002) HDAC6 is a microtubule-
associated deacetylase. Nature 417, 455-458
11. Zhang, Y., Kwon, S., Yamaguchi, T., Cubizolles, F., Rousseaux, S.,
Kneissel, M., Cao, C., Li, N., Cheng, H. L., Chua, K., Lombard, D.,
Mizeracki, A., Matthias, G., Alt, F. W., Khochbin, S., and Matthias, P.
(2008) Mice lacking histone deacetylase 6 have hyperacetylated tubulin
but are viable and develop normally. Mol Cell Biol 28, 1688-1701
12. North, B. J., Marshall, B. L., Borra, M. T., Denu, J. M., and Verdin, E.
(2003) The human Sir2 ortholog, SIRT2, is an NAD+-dependent tubulin
deacetylase. Mol Cell 11, 437-444
13. Bobrowska, A., Donmez, G., Weiss, A., Guarente, L., and Bates, G. (2012)
SIRT2 ablation has no effect on tubulin acetylation in brain, cholesterol
biosynthesis or the progression of Huntington's disease phenotypes in vivo.
81
PLoS One 7, e34805
14. Fukada, M., Hanai, A., Nakayama, A., Suzuki, T., Miyata, N., Rodriguiz,
R. M., Wetsel, W. C., Yao, T. P., and Kawaguchi, Y. (2012) Loss of
deacetylation activity of Hdac6 affects emotional behavior in mice. PLoS
One 7, e30924
15. Gaertig, J., Cruz, M. A., Bowen, J., Gu, L., Pennock, D. G., and Gorovsky,
M. A. (1995) Acetylation of lysine 40 in alpha-tubulin is not essential in
Tetrahymena thermophila. J Cell Biol 129, 1301-1310
16. Kozminski, K. G., Diener, D. R., and Rosenbaum, J. L. (1993) High level
expression of nonacetylatable alpha-tubulin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 25, 158-170
17. Ohkawa, N., Sugisaki, S., Tokunaga, E., Fujitani, K., Hayasaka, T., Setou,
M., and Inokuchi, K. (2008) N-acetyltransferase ARD1-NAT1 regulates
neuronal dendritic development. Genes Cells 13, 1171-1183
18. Solinger, J. A., Paolinelli, R., Kloss, H., Scorza, F. B., Marchesi, S.,
Sauder, U., Mitsushima, D., Capuani, F., Sturzenbaum, S. R., and Cassata,
G. (2010) The Caenorhabditis elegans Elongator complex regulates
neuronal alpha-tubulin acetylation. PLoS Genet 6, e1000820
19. Creppe, C., Malinouskaya, L., Volvert, M. L., Gillard, M., Close, P.,
Malaise, O., Laguesse, S., Cornez, I., Rahmouni, S., Ormenese, S.,
Belachew, S., Malgrange, B., Chapelle, J. P., Siebenlist, U., Moonen, G.,
Chariot, A., and Nguyen, L. (2009) Elongator controls the migration and
differentiation of cortical neurons through acetylation of alpha-tubulin.
Cell 136, 551-564
20. Conacci-Sorrell, M., Ngouenet, C., and Eisenman, R. N. (2010) Myc-nick:
a cytoplasmic cleavage product of Myc that promotes alpha-tubulin
acetylation and cell differentiation. Cell 142, 480-493
21. Shida, T., Cueva, J. G., Xu, Z., Goodman, M. B., and Nachury, M. V.
(2010) The major alpha-tubulin K40 acetyltransferase alphaTAT1
promotes rapid ciliogenesis and efficient mechanosensation. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 107, 21517-21522
22. Akella, J. S., Wloga, D., Kim, J., Starostina, N. G., Lyons-Abbott, S.,
Morrissette, N. S., Dougan, S. T., Kipreos, E. T., and Gaertig, J. (2010)
MEC-17 is an alpha-tubulin acetyltransferase. Nature 467, 218-222
23. Bertos, N. R., Gilquin, B., Chan, G. K., Yen, T. J., Khochbin, S., and Yang,
X. J. (2004) Role of the tetradecapeptide repeat domain of human histone
deacetylase 6 in cytoplasmic retention. J Biol Chem 279, 48246-48254
24. Papageorgio, C., Brachmann, R., Zeng, J., Culverhouse, R., Zhang, W.,
and McLeod, H. (2007) MAGED2: a novel p53-dissociator. Int J Oncol 31,
1205-1211
25. Westendorf, J. J., Zaidi, S. K., Cascino, J. E., Kahler, R., van Wijnen, A. J.,
Lian, J. B., Yoshida, M., Stein, G. S., and Li, X. (2002) Runx2 (Cbfa1,
AML-3) interacts with histone deacetylase 6 and represses the
p21(CIP1/WAF1) promoter. Mol Cell Biol 22, 7982-7992
26. Fukushima, N., Furuta, D., Hidaka, Y., Moriyama, R., and Tsujiuchi, T.
(2009) Post-translational modifications of tubulin in the nervous system. J
82
Neurochem 109, 683-693
27. Baas, P. W., and Black, M. M. (1990) Individual microtubules in the axon
consist of domains that differ in both composition and stability. J Cell Biol
111, 495-509
28. Smith, C. L. (1994) The initiation of neurite outgrowth by sympathetic
neurons grown in vitro does not depend on assembly of microtubules. J
Cell Biol 127, 1407-1418
29. Fukushima, N., and Morita, Y. (2006) Actomyosin-dependent microtubule
rearrangement in lysophosphatidic acid-induced neurite remodeling of
young cortical neurons. Brain Res 1094, 65-75
30. LeDizet, M., and Piperno, G. (1986) Cytoplasmic microtubules containing
acetylated alpha-tubulin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: spatial
arrangement and properties. J Cell Biol 103, 13-22
31. Piperno, G., and Fuller, M. T. (1985) Monoclonal antibodies specific for
an acetylated form of alpha-tubulin recognize the antigen in cilia and
flagella from a variety of organisms. J Cell Biol 101, 2085-2094
32. Nam, H. J., Kang, J. K., Kim, S. K., Ahn, K. J., Seok, H., Park, S. J.,
Chang, J. S., Pothoulakis, C., Lamont, J. T., and Kim, H. (2010)
Clostridium difficile toxin A decreases acetylation of tubulin, leading to
microtubule depolymerization through activation of histone deacetylase 6,
and this mediates acute inflammation. J Biol Chem 285, 32888-32896
33. Sengottuvel, V., and Fischer, D. (2011) Facilitating axon regeneration in
the injured CNS by microtubules stabilization. Commun Integr Biol 4,
391-393
34. Hellal, F., Hurtado, A., Ruschel, J., Flynn, K. C., Laskowski, C. J., Umlauf,
M., Kapitein, L. C., Strikis, D., Lemmon, V., Bixby, J., Hoogenraad, C. C.,
and Bradke, F. (2011) Microtubule stabilization reduces scarring and
causes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Science 331, 928-931
35. Topalidou, I., Keller, C., Kalebic, N., Nguyen, K. C., Somhegyi, H., Politi,
K. A., Heppenstall, P., Hall, D. H., and Chalfie, M. (2012) Genetically
Separable Functions of the MEC-17 Tubulin Acetyltransferase Affect
Microtubule Organization. Curr Biol 22, 1057-1065
36. Cueva, J. G., Hsin, J., Huang, K. C., and Goodman, M. B. (2012)
Posttranslational Acetylation of alpha-Tubulin Constrains Protofilament
Number in Native Microtubules. Curr Biol 22, 1066-1074
37. Hubbert, C., Guardiola, A., Shao, R., Kawaguchi, Y., Ito, A., Nixon, A.,
Yoshida, M., Wang, X. F., and Yao, T. P. (2002) HDAC6 is a microtubule-
associated deacetylase. Nature 417, 455-458
38. Piperno, G., LeDizet, M., and Chang, X. J. (1987) Microtubules
containing acetylated alpha-tubulin in mammalian cells in culture. J Cell
Biol 104, 289-302