id quiz presentation

Upload: tarapeters

Post on 14-Oct-2015

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Instructional Design Ed Tech 503 metaphor project.

TRANSCRIPT

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    1/33

    Instructional DesignMetaphors and Explanations

    Tara Peters

    Boise State University M.E.T. Student

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    2/33

    Table of Contents

    Title page.....1

    Table of contents.....2

    History of ID Graphic.....3

    History of ID......4

    Definition of ID Graphic.....5

    Definition of ID.....6

    Systematic Approach Graphic.....7

    Systematic Approach.....8

    Why Models Graphic.....9Why Models?.....10

    Gerlach and Ely Graphic.....11

    Gerlach and Ely.....12

    ASSURE Graphic.....13

    ASSURE.....14

    PIE Graphic.....15

    PIE.....16

    Morrison, Ross and Kemp Graphic.....17

    Morrison, Ross and Kemp.....18

    Diamond Graphic.....19

    Diamond.....20

    DeHoog, deJong, DeVries Graphic.....21

    DeHoog, deJong, DeVries.....22

    Constructivism Graphic.....23

    Constructivism.....24

    Empiricism Graphic.....25

    Empiricism.....26

    Behaviorism Graphic.....27

    Behaviorism.....28

    Information Processing Theory Graphic.....29Information Processing Theory.....30

    ID and Ed Tech Graphic.....31

    ID and ED Tech.....32

    References.....33

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    3/33

    http://tinyurl.com/a59doc2

    http://tinyurl.com/a59doc2http://tinyurl.com/a59doc2http://tinyurl.com/a59doc2
  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    4/33

    History of ID

    While the study of learning began as early as the late 1800's the field of ID really began

    during WWII when Robert Gagne and others developed efficient, effective training

    materials for the U.S. military. (Leigh, 1999)

    B.F. Skinner strongly influenced ID through the development of programmed instruction.

    Benjamin Bloom developed and refined the taxonomies of learning many, of not most,

    teachers and instructional designers still use today. Another early pioneer in the field wasGagne, who had a great deal of influence on the development of ID as we know it today.

    (Leigh, 1999)

    Computers, the internet, and mobile devices have had and will continue to have a great

    deal of influence on ID because technology continues to lead to refinements and

    adaptations that allow instructional designers to make the most of the available theories

    and models in a variety of settings to the benefit of students everywhere.

    I chose the path as a visual metaphor for this slide because ID has followed a path with

    some curves and stopping off points along the way. We do not see a definitive beginning

    or end because there is rarely a straight pathway or absolute start or end points in most

    historical processes. http://tinyurl.com/a59doc2

    http://tinyurl.com/a59doc2http://tinyurl.com/a59doc2http://tinyurl.com/a59doc2
  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    5/33

    http://tinyurl.com/bcfa7lv

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    6/33

    Definition of ID

    Instructional design is a systematic process we use to translate what we know about

    teaching and learning into the assessments, materials and activities, and the evaluation

    we need to create effective, efficient learning. (Smith and Ragan, 2005)

    In order for instruction to be effective it needs to have an end goal in mind, and it also

    needs to be developed in a systematic fashion. The instructional designer will want to

    know the goals of the instruction or the problem to be solved, what sort or strategy will beutilized, how the instruction will be delivered (live, online etc.), and what will success look

    like? (Smith and Ragan, 2005).

    Good instructional design will not only result in an effective product, it will also result in an

    attractive product. Boring or confusing presentations will not capture the interest of the

    learner so the content will not be viewed, or if it is viewed it might be forgotten.Instructional designers are aware that content should be presented in such a way as to

    drawn the learner into the setting and spark interest. http://tinyurl.com/bcfa7lv

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    7/33

    http://tinyurl.com/9wrj5l

    q

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    8/33

    Systematic Approach

    The systematic approach to instructional design provides a number of advantages. First,

    it helps designers keep the learner in mind throughout the creation process. Each step

    asks questions about the learner that the design must address in order to ensure the end

    product is truly useful to the learner. (Smith and Ragan, 2005)

    Designers also carefully consider the effectiveness, efficiency and appeal of their

    product. By using a systematic approach to each of these considerations the IDprofessional can concentrate on what is meaningful to the learner while discarding

    material that would be superfluous. A systematic approach is useful in a collaborative

    setting. It provides a common way of thinking and communicating about the project and

    makes review and revision easier. Other important considerations are that ID products

    are products that can be duplicated, distributed and adapted to a variety of settings,. A

    major advantage of using a systematic approach to ID is that objectives, activities andassessments all line up and are appropriate. (Smith and Ragan, 2005)

    The nervous system and its relationship to the rest of the body is a metaphor for the

    systematic approach ID takes. While there are many parts to the design, they must all be

    connected and directed by one common framework in order to serve their function.http://tinyurl.com/9wrj

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    9/33

    http://tinyurl.com/afm83uj

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    10/33

    Why Models?

    Instructional design models, like models in other fields, help us structure how we think

    about a problem. By applying a model the instructional designer can approach the entire

    problem one segment or issue at a time in a planned and deliberate manner all the while

    keeping the learner as the center of attention. Models help us conceptualize, analyze,

    and evaluate learning in a variety of contexts.

    Many instructional design models exist because no single model would be useful in all

    situations. Instead, a number of models have been developed to work better in one

    situation than another. For example, the Morrison, Ross and Kemp model is effective for

    classroom teaching but would not be as applicable in a systems-oriented setting. (Branch

    and Gustafson, 2002)

    The molecular model is a good metaphor for this concept because, like an ID model, it is

    complex and meaningful to the trained eye but may only represent a nice form to the

    untrained eye. Each individual piece is meaningful and deliberately placed, and all parts

    are essential to the function of the whole. It is effective in that it does what it is intended

    to do, and it is efficient in that it has no extra parts or pathways. http://tinyurl.com/afm83uj

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    11/33

    http://tinyurl.com/am323q9

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    12/33

    Gerlach and Ely

    Although Gerlach and Ely prefer to start with objectives, their model recognizes that

    content is important to teachers and may be many teachers' first considerations when

    planning a course or lesson. Their simultaneously linear and concurrent model allows for

    content to be considered alongside objectives so there is flexibility in the development of

    the project. (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    Learners are assessed then decisions will be made about the instructional strategy, how

    students will be organized or grouped, which resources will be used and how time and

    space will be allocated. These considerations occur simultaneously, and each has an

    impact on the other. Once instruction has taken place then student performance is

    evaluated and feedback provided to the teacher. Finally, revisions can be made based on

    the evaluation and feedback. (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    I chose a complicated highway interchange as the visual metaphor for this model

    because like the model, the interchange is intended to move people in one direction to

    get them where they are going, but many things are going on at once, and what happens

    in one area will impact another. http://tinyurl.com/am323q9

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    13/33

    http://tinyurl.com/a8rmvav

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    14/33

    ASSURE

    Heinich, Molenda, Russell and Smaldino developed ASSURE, which is a classroom

    oriented ID model that is popular with classroom teachers because it aligns well with the

    reality of classroom teaching. What does ASSURE stand for?

    + A - Analyze learners to determine their starting point prior to beginning

    instruction

    + S - State the objectives so the desired outcome is known, specific andmeasurable.

    + S - Select the media and materials that will enhance the learning process

    + U - Utilize the media and materials during instruction

    + R - Require learner participation including practice and feedback

    + E - Evaluate the results and revise the instruction to improve outcomes and

    ensure feasibility (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    I chose the picture of holding hands to represent the assure model because the metaphor

    fits quite nicely with the idea that instructors readily understand this model and find it

    useful, which is reassuring. http://tinyurl.com/a8rmvav

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    15/33

    http://tinyurl.com/akw4xfq

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    16/33

    PIE

    Newby, Stepich, Lehman and Russell developed the PIE model, which stands for Plan,

    Implement, and Evaluate. This model supports a shift from teacher-centered to learner-

    centered instruction, and the authors describe roles for the students in every phase of

    learning to highlight this point. The PIE model also promotes the use of technology in the

    instructional process provided it is properly planned for, implemented and evaluated.

    (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    This model is interesting in that it is framed with a set of questions one one side of a grid

    and the headings planning, implementation and evaluation on the other. The grid can

    then be followed by answering questions as they relate to the three phases and this

    process can help guide the teacher toward an effective and well considered plan. (Branch

    and Gustafson, 2002)

    Of course, the pie metaphor was rather obvious, but I particularly liked the smiling pies on

    a stick because it represents something that is familiar and comforting but at the same

    time presented in an innovative way. http://tinyurl.com/akw4xfq

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    17/33

    http://tinyurl.com/acw5ouq

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    18/33

    Morrison, Ross & Kemp

    This learner-centered instructional development model focuses on curriculum planning.

    By assessing both objectives and learners' needs at any point in the process,

    instructional designers can deal with individual elements on an as needed basis, and

    develop the instruction according to a number of key questions that characterize this

    model. (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    Teachers appreciate the concept of "start where you are" which allows teachers and

    designers to do just that rather than start at a predetermined point (the beginning).

    Teachers also find the emphasis on content, goals and resources familiar and attractive.

    Evaluation is continuous and all activities are tied to goals, priorities or needs, and the

    limitations imposed by the teacher's current setting. (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    I chose the graphic I did to convey the idea that it is perfectly fine to just start from where

    you are in this ID model. No need for panic if your situation does not exactly match a

    preconceived idea of where you should be, just get started! http://tinyurl.com/acw5ouq

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    19/33

    http://tinyurl.com/bb7spvq

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    20/33

    Diamond Model

    Diamond created a systems-based model for higher education institutions. He believed

    that instructional design and development is a team effort, and his model is useful when

    designing comprehensive curriculum as well as individual courses. Diamond encourages

    input from various university personnel in order to address political and social as well as

    learning considerations. (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    One of Diamond's most appealing notions is that the instructional design process shouldbegin with ideal solutions in mind rather than thinking of what constraints exist at the

    moment. His argument is that this starting point will encourage creativity and innovations.

    This is the same idea I heard movie producer Jon Landau advocate recently, stating that

    if creators merely think of what is possible right now they will always be behind the wave.

    Truly creative thinkers imagine what is possible and then set about to make that dream a

    reality. While this may not always be possible it is a worthy idea and can lead to uniquesolutions to real problems. (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    The metaphor is obvious but a good one in that one can see clearly all the different facets

    of the diamond or product as rather plain on their own but brilliant in the end product they

    produce in the aggregate. http://tinyurl.com/bb7spvq

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    21/33

    http://tinyurl.com/au4ab64

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    22/33

    DeHoog, deJong, DeVries

    DeHoog, deJong and DeVries developed a product- oriented instructional design model

    suitable for simulations and expert systems. They stress a comprehensive approach to

    the design process much like a web in that the results will be inferior or non-productive if

    the system is not followed properly. (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    Their model is made up of smaller models which are the conceptual, operational,instructional, interface and learner models. Each has a specific role in the overall

    development process and must be adequately addressed but often by different teams.

    The model appears to be at least somewhat specialized and not readily applicable to

    some environments but undoubtedly quite relevant to others. (Branch and Gustafson,

    2002)

    Like their model, the spider web requires near perfect execution in the design, the

    process and the materials used. Each has a specific role and must be performed or

    created as intended in order for the web to be functional and hold up over time. As the

    creators of this model state, the approach must be comprehensive or the results will be

    disastrous. http://tinyurl.com/au4ab64

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    23/33

    http://tinyurl.com/a34fdq4

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    24/33

    Constructivism

    Constructivism is an educational philosophy grounded in the idea that reason is the

    primary source of knowledge and that we construct rather than discover knowledge.

    While not all educators that consider themselves constructivists hold the same ideas

    about this educational philosophy, they do believe that learners construct their own

    knowledge. (Smith and Ragan, 2005)

    Learners do this through experience and by applying personal interpretations to

    knowledge, and by actively participating in knowledge construction. As new knowledge is

    added to old knowledge ideas are re-examined and reconstructed, resulting in new

    knowledge. While perspectives vary about constructivism, its meaning and the exact

    process, some of the most influential ideas are that learning is collaborative (social

    constructivism) and that learners should be involved in realistics settings in order toexperience "authentic" learning. (Smith and Ragan, 2005)

    The graphic represents these ideas because this painting likely means different things to

    different people. Previous ideas and experiences, the observations of others and

    perspective might all influence how individuals will view and interpret this painting.http://tinyurl.com/a34fdq4

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    25/33

    http://tinyurl.com/aelgzhb

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    26/33

    Empiricism

    Knowledge is acquired through objective or sensory experience rather than a mental

    reconceptualization of experience and ideas. Empiricists will also reduce complex ideas

    into more simple components and relate ideas and experiences to create a contiguous

    progression of knowledge acquisition and understanding. (Smith and Ragan, 2005)

    In empiricism, scientific experimentation creates data which is then used to formulategeneral conclusions about the way things work. For example, nurses value evidence-

    based practice because the care we provide to patients should be based on proven

    practices rather than our individual or even collective ideas about what feels right at the

    moment. This is a sort of empiricism in that we identify a question, study it and generate

    data, then draw evidence-based conclusions from that data.

    What better representative of the concept of empiricism than Albert Einstein? He andmany others have considered an idea, formulated hypotheses, then set about gathering

    evidence and running experiments until the hypothesis was proved or disproved.http://tinyurl.com/aelgzh

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    27/33

    http://tinyurl.com/bd5vw78

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    28/33

    Behaviorism

    While those who adhere to the behaviorist theory have a range of views, one common

    idea is that the only really worthwhile aspect of human learning worth studying is that

    which can be observed or measured. Thinking processes and and other unobservable

    states are given a backseat to an interest in observable, measurable phenomena. (Smith

    and Ragan, 2005)

    Behaviorism embraces the idea that learners respond to their environment and whenthose responses result in positive reinforcement (some kind of a reward), then learners

    will repeat those learned behaviors (conditioning) in the presence of certain stimuli even

    in the absence of the expected reward. The idea of programed instruction has its roots in

    behaviorism, and these ideas further led to the idea that innovations such as nonhuman

    mediated instruction could be developed, tested, and made effective. While one might

    think of Pavlov's dog when the subject of behaviorism arises, the theory has had a major

    impact on how quality ID is developed and tested. (Smith and Ragan, 2005)

    The high jumper represents behaviorism because what is important in the high jump, the

    execution and the results, can both be observed and measured. Consistent execution

    leads to consistent results which serve to reinforce desirable behaviors.http://tinyurl.com/bd5vw78

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    29/33

    http://tinyurl.com/b3tdqqv

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    30/33

    Information Processing Theory

    Learning is a series of transformations of information that take place in the brain. The

    brain structures that allow information to be processes as the theory describes are

    theoretical and are likely not provable in a physical sense. however, the idea is these

    structures process information and serve to mediate between the instruction offered and

    the learner. (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    Some have describe these structures as a type of storage, with learning explained as thetransformation of information through these structures, processors, and sub-processors.

    Only needed information that is actively perceived is processed, which prevents a system

    overload. Prior learning and experiences help us filter out extraneous stimuli so we can

    attend to what we perceive as important. This cognitive theory helps explain why a novice

    might process information differently than an expert or why they might consider some

    stimuli important whereas the expert pay it little head. (Branch and Gustafson, 2002)

    The metamorphosis of the caterpillar to the butterfly is a metaphor for this idea in that

    one step leads to another and that results build over time. Just as the learner must go

    through certain steps to move from being a novice to an expert, the caterpillar must do

    the same to go from its present state to being a butterfly. http://tinyurl.com/b3tdqq

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    31/33

    http://tinyurl.com/baeg7hw

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    32/33

    ID and Ed Tech

    Instructional Design and Educational Technology are closely linked because ID provides

    us with a systematic approach to both the educational process and how technology will

    be used to enhance the educational experience the instructional designer envisions.

    When we utilize the type of systematic approach ID demands we can determine what

    needs to be taught, how the information needs to be delivered, and how learner

    achievement will be measured. Educational technology can help us deliver content in anefficient, attractive way that is accessible to learners regardless of location or time.

    Technology can also allow us to create simulations, illustrations and demonstrations that

    learners can access repeatedly which enhances learning. If repetition and trial and error

    are effective instructional methods, then any technology that allows instructional

    designers deliver learning experiences that make this possible should be welcomed by ID

    professionals.

    The double helix is a good metaphor for the relationship between ID and Ed Tech

    because both parts of the whole have their own distinct purpose and structure, but when

    they are linked systematically the resulting product moves beyond the limitations of each

    individual part resulting in infinite possibilities. http://tinyurl.com/baeg7hw

  • 5/24/2018 ID Quiz Presentation

    33/33

    References

    Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of Instructional Development Models. (4th Ed.).

    Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.

    Leigh, D. (1999). A Brief History of Instructional Design. Retrieved from

    http://www.pignc-ispi.com/articles/education/brief%20history.htm.

    Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional Design (3rd Ed).Hoboken, NJ: Wiley/Jossey-Bass

    Education.