icecube 79 solar wimp searchmda65/talks/ic79wimp_brussels.pdf · 2010-10-12 · matthias danninger...
TRANSCRIPT
IceCube 79 Solar WIMP Search
Matthias Danninger
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 2
Overview
● IC79-detector in analysis
● Status & Plans IC79 WIMPs
IC86 sens. study vs. IC79
processing L0/L1/L2
higher analysis levels
● IC79 Dark Matter prospects: summer conferences
how to present results
MODELS considered
• arise in extensions of the Standard Model• assumed to be stable: relics from the Big Bang• mass from few GeV to few TeV
candidates:
• MSSM: lightest super-symmetric particle (LSP) neutralino,
χ01 = z1 1 B + z1 2 W3 + z1 3 H0
1+ z1 4 H02
simulation of “softest” and “hardest” case
hard: m(χ01) [35 GeV – 5 TeV] (τ+τ− / W+W-)
soft: m(χ01) [35 GeV – 5 TeV] (b b)
• Universal extra dimensions: Lightest Kaluza-Klein particle (LKP), B( 1 ) or γ ( 1 )
fixed branching ratios: m(γ ( 1 ) [250 GeV–3TeV]
R
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 3
IceCube 79-string detectorfiducial detector volume:
→ all inner strings (2-string veto) → 10 top-DOM veto layer
DeepCore detector volume: → standard definition
parameters & observables:→ HLC-pulses (+fits)
→ seededRTCut cleaned SLC+HLC-pulses (+fits)
115 expected days of data 97% uptime 111.5 days 62% of sens. study→ → →VolumeTrigger not running! 50% sensitivity loss for low masses at filter levelseveral improvements expected (already): filters, SLC & comb. Llh-recopreliminary analysis-framework is prepared ready to start→
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 4
IC79 WIMPs analysis plansIceCube-80 + DeepCore-6 sensitivity:
● final geometry & high QE PMTs included(string 79 & 80 @ original location)
● high statistics samples of corsika µ-background and atm backgroundν(incl. coincident 2 and 3 background)μ μ
● Current reconstruction-methods (IceCube-59) used
full analysis chain optimized (all simulation) (incl. multivariate cuts)
IC79 WIMPs starting point
http://icecube.wisc.edu/~mda65/talks/Madison0409.pdfOriginal talk:
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 5
Low-level steps IC79 analysis →
General Points
HQE-DOM efficiency
more (new signal MC)
IC86 → IC79 retrigger
SMT4 trigger SMT3→
new analysis framework incl. SLC+HLC pulses
SLC+HLC llh-reco shows improvement for low multipl.-tracks
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 6
General Points
HQE-DOM efficiency
more (new signal MC)
IC86 → IC79 retrigger
SMT4 trigger SMT3→
new analysis framework incl. SLC+HLC pulses
SLC+HLC llh-reco shows improvement for low multipl.-tracks
IC79 - L0/L1SLC cleaning (fixed)
adjust event-TW ( L2) →-------------------------------optimized online filters (DC wimp events get filtered with 99.9% eff.)+ lowUP_2010
SLC+HLC llh-reco improves string-triggered signal filter-eff. & better background rejection
Low-level steps IC79 analysis →
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 7
General Points
HQE-DOM efficiency
more (new signal MC)
IC86 → IC79 retrigger
SMT4 trigger SMT3→
new analysis framework incl. SLC+HLC pulses
SLC+HLC llh-reco shows improvement for low multipl.-tracks
IC79 - L0/L1SLC cleaning (fixed)
adjust event-TW ( L2) →-------------------------------optimized online filters (DC wimp events get filtered with 99.9% eff.)+ lowUP_2010
SLC+HLC llh-reco improves string-triggered signal filter-eff. & better background rejection
IC79 - L2Work in progresswith muon-wg,low-E & wimp-wg---------------------------------SLC-hitCleaningincl. best possible SLChits
NFE vs. oldFEX-check, effect on llh-reco
Which L2 track reco
Low Level AnalysisVery important
Low-level steps IC79 analysis →
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 8
high-level steps IC79 analysis→
L3
L3 processing wimps?L2 good enough?If L3, muon-wg L3?---------------------------
LLHreco zenith angle [86° < < 120°] Θ
excl. single string events nstring > 1
z_travel > -30m
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 9
L3
L3 processing wimps?L2 good enough?If L3, muon-wg L3?---------------------------
LLHreco zenith angle [86° < < 120°] Θ
excl. single string events nstring > 1
z_travel > -30m
L4
selection of horizontal track-like events------------------------------
_av < 100m Sum all strings (Sum shortest distance track to string/nchan)
z_extern < 400m
high-level steps IC79 analysis→
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 10
L3
L3 processing wimps?L2 good enough?If L3, muon-wg L3?---------------------------
LLHreco zenith angle [86° < < 120°] Θ
excl. single string events nstring > 1
z_travel > -30m
L4
selection of horizontal track-like events------------------------------
_av < 100m Sum all strings (Sum shortest distance track to string/nchan)
z_extern < 400m
L5 (multivariate)
group low-E and high-E
~12“high-quality”variables
determine best TMVA routine(s) 1-or-2 dim cut
IC79-data as Bg (train & test) more independent of MC→
high-level steps IC79 analysis→
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 11
more ideas
Some where around L4-L5
sample of selected high quality horizontal events(O~10 events)⁴---------------------------
improve ang. resolution with SLC+HLC hybrid-reco (5-6 min/event)
finest binning photo-rec, etc. (lot's to investigate here)
invert 10°-bin simulation strategy, only load tables needed
not to separate µ
Only test
Only test
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 12
final step ....→
Setting limits
Shape analysis seems like the way to go
Prospects for IC79 IC86 →
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 13
Prospects:WIMP-Model-independent Result
effective area for final event selection as function of Eν in the
range 20-1000 GeV, for νµ and anti-νµ from the
direction of the Sun.
The result is an average over the austral winter.
Blue curve optimized for low WIMP masses
Black curve optimized for high WIMP masses
IC22: Systematic effects are included at the 1 level, and statistical σuncertainty of the same level are shown with error bars.
Preliminary
Abbasi et al., Physical Review D81 (2010) 057101. (IC22 result)
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 14
Prospects:WIMP-Model-independent Result
effective area for final event selection as function of Eν in the
range 20-1000 GeV, for νµ and anti-νµ from the
direction of the Sun.
The result is an average over the austral winter.
Blue curve optimized for low WIMP masses
Black curve optimized for high WIMP masses
IC22: Systematic effects are included at the 1 level, and statistical σuncertainty of the same level are shown with error bars.
Preliminary
Abbasi et al., Physical Review D81 (2010) 057101. (IC22 result)
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 15
WIMP-Model-independent Result
The median angular error , Θ shown with the statistical uncertainty at the 1 level.σ
Preliminary
Hybrid (S. Lafebre)
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 16
Kaluza-Klein DM (LKP)Abbasi et al., Physical Review D81 (2010) 057101.
<E νμ
> = 53 GeV
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 17
Neutralino DM (LSP)Need to be updated+ incl. new limits(CDMS-2010, superK-2009, more?)
+ add IC86 lifetime of 180d
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 18
Neutralino DM (LSP)Updated CDMS 2010 limit
New Super-K analysis (2009) 3109.6dSoft & hard limits
Antares 3y sensitivity not so interesting not shown→
MSSM scan:
Outdated SI-limits
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 19
Neutralino DM (LSP)Updated CDMS 2010 limit
New Super-K analysis (2009) 3109.6dSoft & hard limits
Antares 3y sensitivity not so interesting not shown→
MSSM scan:Currently non-excl. models
Outdated SI-limitsPre-limited DM content
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 20
Neutralino DM (LSP)Updated CDMS 2010 limit
New Super-K analysis (2009) 3109.6dSoft & hard limits
Antares 3y sensitivity not so interesting not shown→
MSSM scan:Currently non-excl. Models
Non-excl Models, even after 10 ³ improvement SI-limits⁻
Outdated SI-limitsPre-limited DM content
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 21
Neutralino DM (LSP)Updated CDMS 2010 limit
New Super-K analysis (2009) 3109.6dSoft & hard limits
Antares 3y sensitivity not so interesting not shown→
MSSM scan:Currently non-excl. Models
Non-excl Models, even after 10 ³ improvement SI-limits⁻
WMAP favored model Carlos MSSM scan
Outdated SI-limitsPre-limited DM content
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 22
Neutralino DM (LSP)Updated CDMS 2010 limit
New Super-K analysis (2009) 3109.6dSoft & hard limits
Antares 3y sensitivity not so interesting not shown→
MSSM scan:Currently non-excl. Models
Non-excl Models, even after 10 ³ improvement SI-limits⁻
WMAP favored model CMSSM scan (Darren)
Outdated SI-limitsPre-limited DM content
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 23
Neutralino DM (LSP)Updated CDMS 2010 limit
New Super-K analysis (2009) 3109.6dSoft & hard limits
Antares 3y sensitivity not so interesting not shown→
MSSM scan:Currently non-excl. Models
CMSSM scan (Darren)(/data/sim/IceCube/2007/generated/LE_deepcore/darkSUSY/cmssm)
WMAP favored model
Outdated SI-limitsPre-limited DM content
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 24
Even more plans for futureFrom prospects
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 25
AND MORE plans for futureFrom prospectsmSUGRA
CMSSMMSSM
Scan models→ fixed branching ratio→ simulate annihilation spectrum→ (check if equilibrium condition is met)
Convolute with effective neutrino area (livetime etc.)
Compare with number of observed events → limit (e.g. IC79)→ excluded yes/no
Possible to decide model by modelAnd plot various interesting MSSM spaces
J. Edsö + P. Scott (phenomenology side)
me (detector side)
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 26
Deep Core events
Thank You
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 27
Additional Slides
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 28
Additional Slides
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 29
Neutralino DM (LSP)
IceCube-22 & study: Only used data, when Sun is below the horizon
main syst. uncertainty:Photon propagation in the ice & absolute DOM efficiency (~20%)
relate muon flux and WIMPnucleon crosssection:
IC80-onlyIC80+DC6
Additional mass 35GeV
Matthias Danninger September 20, 2010 Brussels Collaboration Meeting 30
Additional Slides
Preliminary
Preliminary