icd 30 – interface control€¦ · 00001, which is the location of the telecommunications...

River Protection Project Waste Treatment Plant 2435 Stevens Center Place Richland, WA 99354 United States of America Tel: 509 371 2000

NOTE: This document defines current service needs, future needs, and

service gaps. The identified service levels do not represent contractual obligations between service recipient and providers. Future contractual and funding actions to close service gaps will be accomplished by integration between the federal offices as part of the budget planning process.

24590-MGT-F00022 Rev 4 (Revised 12/19/2016) Ref: 24590-WTP-GPP-RAOS-OS-0001

Document title: ICD 30 – Interface Control Document for Direct LAW Feed

Document number: 24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1

Contract: DE-AC27-01RV14136 Contract deliverable: C.9.1

Department: Project Management

NOTE: Obtain concurrence and approval signatures on the following page prior to

approval of this ICD.

Approved by: Felice Presti

Signature Date

BNI Area Project Manager, DFLAW/BOF/LAB

Issue Status: Approved

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1

ICD 30, Direct LAW Feed

Page ii


Interface Signature Page

Interface organizations, as appropriate, sign this sheet indicating concurrence and approval with the ICD contents. These signatures signify that the ICD accurately reflects the current baselines of interface organization’s contracts, except as indicated in Appendix A, ICD 30 Open Issues and Actions. The BNI APM does not approve this ICD until all required signatures on this page have been obtained.

Interface Concurrence

Organization Position Name Signature Date

WTP Contractor ICD 30 Preparer Leon Goytowski

WTP Contractor Prime Contracts Manager Brian Ponte

WTP Contractor Design Authority Ian Milgate

WTP Contractor One System Operations Manager

Robert Henckel

WTP Contractor ICD 30 Interface Owner David Reinemann

TOC ICD 30 Interface Owner Stuart Arm

ORP-WTP ICD 30 Interface Owner Tom Nirider

Interface Approval

Organization Position Name Signature Date

ORP-WSC Assistant Manager for WTP Startup, Commissioning and Integration (Acting)

Delmar Noyes

ORP-TF Assistant Manager for Tank Farms Project

Glyn Trenchard

ORP-WTP Assistant Manager for WTP Project

Bill Hamel

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page iii


History Sheet

Rev Date Reason for revision Revised by 0 14-Sep-15 Initial Issue D. Reinemann

M. Pell

1 09-Nov-17 Revised per Scoping Checklist CCN #289150. Incorporation of 24590-WTP-ICF-MGT-17-0002, Increase Nominal Particle Diameter for Filtration. Sufficient content and formatting of the document has changed for this revision to constitute a total rewrite, and revision bars are not used.

L. Goytowski

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page iv


Revision Description

ICD Section Description

N/A This document is totally rewritten to support WTP requirements management and to conform to the revised ICD template defined by 24590-WTP-GPP-RAOS-OS-0001, Rev. 1, Interface Control Documents.

Acronyms Acronyms updated as needed to align with text.

Section 1 Sub-section headings were deleted. Contract note delineating DFLAW removed. Paragraph describing Table 1 requirements was deleted.

Table 1. Revision 0

No longer exists. Content has been transposed into Sections 3 and 4 in accordance with 24590-WTP-3DP-G04B-00004, Technical Requirements Management, and 24590-WTP-GPP-RAOP-OP-0003, Activity Level Flowdown of Requirements Applicable to Commissioning Phase Activities.

Tables Renumbered based on Table 1 from Revision 0 being eliminated.

Section 2.1.1 Updated to reference Node 18, as depicted in Interface Control Drawing, 24590-WTP-B2-C12T-00001, which is the location of the Telecommunications interface and not at the transfer feed line interface.

Section 2.1.1 Inserted sentence for ASME B31.3 criteria.

Section 2.1.1 Updated Insulation Specifications.

Section 2.1.1 Added HNF-SD-WM-TSR-006 as requirement source for freeze protection. Added statements to address implementation of freeze protection.

Section 2.1.1.1 First paragraph revised. Figure 1 added. Sentence added in 3rd paragraph to state that a vacuum breaker will be installed at LAWPS to avoid siphoning at the low point drain tank. Fifth paragraph added to detail WTP Operations Requirements Document, 24590-WTP-RPT-OP-01-001, transfer piping requirements.

Section 2.1.2 Section updated to detail fiber optic connection using a PROFIBUS network.

Section 2.1.3 Inserted new section to more accurately describe shared transfer data. Figure 2 added.

Section 2.1.4 Re-numbered due to new Section 2.1.3.

Section 2.1.5 Re-numbered due to new Section 2.1.3. Provided additional language to clarify transfer line completion.

Tables 1 & 2 Design information updated. Notes updated.

Section 2.1.5.1 Added to indicate retesting of pressure boundary during operation to WTP design criteria.

Tables 3 & 4 Labeled, previously not marked. Updated wording to put emphasis on activities. Activity IDs updated.

Section 2.2.2 Expanded description of mission planning activities.

Section 2.2.4 TOC references updated.

Section 2.3 First paragraph added to discuss the Integrated Direct Feed Low Activity Waste Feed Qualification Program Description. Updated reference documentation. Discussion of Envelope E added. Table 4 renumbered to Table 5. References added to Table 5 and notes updated.

Section 2.3 Changed filtration requirement based on 24590-WTP-ICF-17-0002.

Section 2.3 Par 8, clarified acceptance procees for hot commissioning feed.

Section 2.3 Table 5 (rev 0) is now Table 6. Added references. Updated note 4 for filtration criteria.

Section 2.3. Last paragraph: References updated. Clarification of Table 6 criticality parameters intent.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page v


Revision Description

ICD Section Description

Section 2.4 Configuration Management items updated as applicable. Table 6 is now Table 7.

Section 2.5.1 Sentence added.

Section 2.5.1.1 Revised to discuss TSAP content.

Section 2.5.1.2 First paragraph updated to emphasize DFLAW campaign sampling.

Section 2.5.1.3 Section significantly revised to clarify verification of LAWPS lag storage (batch) vs. DFLAW feed campaign sampling.

Section 2.5.1.4 New subsection.

Section 2.5.1.5 Formerly Section 2.5.1.4

Section 2.5.2 Clarification of batch sample dialog.

Section 2.6.2 Replace transfer line volume approximation with design constraint for flush water. Reference updated. Deleted flush flow rate limit of 88 gpm.

Section 2.6.3.1 Added to discuss transfer process.

Table 7 Renumbered as Table 8.

Section 3.1 Added to detail WTP design criteria, Sections 3.1-3.1.15

Section 3.2 Added Place Holder-No content.

Section 3.3 Added Place Holder-No content.

Section 3.4 Added activity level flow down of ICD requirements applicable to WTP Commisioning.

Section 4.1 Added WTP Internal Interface tasks to be performed.

Section 4.2 Added External Interface items for TOC and ORP tasks to be performed.

Section 4.3 Added Table 9 to detail alignment of current responsibilities between Contractors and ORP.

Section 5 Formerly Section 3. Updated as needed.

Appendix A Moved Issues I30-01 and I30-02 to Appendix B as closed.

Appendix B Represents issues closed in Appendix B.

Appendix C Added new Open Items 1, 2, and 3.

Appendix D Added Figure D.1, DFLAW Feed Transfer Process Flow to show transfer process. Table D.1, minor clarifications made.

Appendix E Updated definitions as applicable.

Appendix F New content detailing preliminary integrated control data.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page vi


Contents History Sheet ................................................................................................................................ iii

Revision Description .................................................................................................................... iv

Acronyms .................................................................................................................................... viii

1 Interface Description .............................................................................................................1

2 Interface Information ............................................................................................................1

2.1 Physical Interfaces ................................................................................................................................. 1

2.2 Administrative Interfaces ...................................................................................................................... 8

2.3 Acceptance Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 10

2.4 Configuration Management Items ...................................................................................................... 15

2.5 Sampling and Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 16

2.6 Transfer Procedure .............................................................................................................................. 18

2.7 Treated LAW Feed Transfer Limitations and Requirements .......................................................... 20

3 WTP Requirements .............................................................................................................21

3.1 Technical Requirements (Design Criteria) ........................................................................................ 21

3.2 Programmatic Requirements .............................................................................................................. 22

3.3 Packaging Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 22

3.4 Activity Level Flow Down Requirements ........................................................................................... 22

4 Requisite Interface Items ....................................................................................................24

4.1 Internal Interface Items ....................................................................................................................... 24

4.2 External Interface Items ...................................................................................................................... 24

4.3 Interface Responsibility Matrix .......................................................................................................... 26

5 References ............................................................................................................................28

Appendices Appendix A - Open ICD 30 Issues and Actions ..................................................................... A-1

Appendix B - Issues and Actions Closed Since Last Revision ...............................................B-1

Appendix C - ICD 30 Open Items List .................................................................................... C-1

Appendix D - Draft Transfer Procedure Concepts ................................................................ D-1

Appendix E - Definitions ...........................................................................................................E-1

Appendix F - Shared Process Control and Monitoring Data ................................................ F-1

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page vii


Tables Table 1 New Primary (Inner) Pipe ............................................................................................... 6

Table 2 New Encasement Pipe ...................................................................................................... 7

Table 3 Milestone 30 A .................................................................................................................. 8

Table 4 Milestone 30 B................................................................................................................... 9

Table 5 DFLAW Feed Constituents for Reporting Purposes .................................................. 10

Table 6 Treated LAW Feed Acceptance Criteria ..................................................................... 13

Table 7 Interface Configuration Management Items ............................................................... 15

Table 8 Treated LAW Feed Transfer Physical Limits ............................................................. 20

Table 9 Interface Responsibility Matrix ..................................................................................... 26

Table 10 DFLAW Feed Transfer Process Steps ........................................................................ D-2

Table 11 Shared Process Control and Monitoring Data ........................................................... F-1

Figures Figure 1 DFLAW Feed Transfer Interface .................................................................................... 2

Figure 2 DFLAW Data Sources ...................................................................................................... 5

Figure 3 DFLAW Feed Transfer Process Flow ......................................................................... D-1

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page viii


Acronyms

ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

BNI Bechtel National, Incorporated

BOF Balance of Facilities

CRV concentrate receipt vessel

CSER criticality safety evaluation report

DFLAW Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste

DOE US Department of Energy

DQO data quality objective

DST double-shell tank

DWP Dangerous Waste Permit

EMF effluent management facility

ICD

ICN

interface control document

integrated control network

ILAW immobilized low-activity waste

LAW low-activity waste

LAWPS Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System

LCP LAW concentrate receipt process system

NEMA National Electrical Manufacturers Association

ORP US Department of Energy, Office of River Protection

PCB

PCS

polychlorinated biphenyl

process control system

PMB

PROFIBUS

PSIG

RADA

RAEG

performance measurement baseline

process field bus

pounds per square inch

Requirement Area - Design Agency

Requirement Area – Engineering Design Authority

RAMI reliability, availability, maintainability, and inspectability

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page ix


RAOP Requirement Area - Operations

RPP River Protection Project

SAC

SAP

TSAP

specific administrative control

Sampling and Analysis Plan

Tank Sampling and Analysis Plan

TBD to be determined

TF Tank Farms

TOC Tank Operations Contractor

WAC Washington Administrative Code

WRPS Washington River Protection Solutions

WTP Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 1


1 Interface Description

This interface control document (ICD) describes the required physical and administrative interactions that allow for the direct transfer of Hanford Tank Farms (TF) treated low-activity waste (LAW) feed by the Tank Operations Contractor (TOC) to the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) LAW Facility. This mode of operation is known as direct feed LAW (DFLAW). This document does not cover the direct transfer of Hanford tank waste to any other WTP facility.

The Hanford Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) provides treated LAW feed to the WTP LAW Facility. LAWPS functional requirements to support DFLAW operation for treated LAW feed storage, characterization (sampling), transfer monitoring, treated LAW feed delivery, and waste pretreatment are provided in Project T5L01 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Specification, RPP-SPEC-56967 (WRPS 2016c).

2 Interface Information

2.1 Physical Interfaces

Physical Description

The transfer line physical interface for the treated LAW feed from the LAWPS to the LAW Facility is located at the WTP site boundary (Node 13) as shown on the Interface Control Drawing, 24590-WTP-B2-C12T-00001 (BNI 2016a). The interface for the instrumentation signal lines between the WTP Contractor and the TOC is located on the telecommunications pole identified as Node 18, as shown on the Interface Control Drawing.

The treated LAW feed transfer pipeline primarily consists of a three-inch schedule 40 stainless-steel type 316/316L carrier pipe, encased in a six-inch carbon steel secondary containment pipe. Each facility’s portion of of the transfer line is designed, constructed, inspected and tested to the criteria required by ASME B31.3, Process Piping, in Double Shell Tank Transfer Piping Subsystem Specification, HNF-4161 (WRPS 2013) and Engineering Specification for Piping Class S32B, 24590-WTP-3PB-P000-TS32B (BNI 2013a). The encasement (exterior) pipe has an epoxy coating for corrosion protection and is insulated with rigid-polyurethane foam protected with a waterproof nonmetallic insulation jacket as described by Response to ORP Question on Cathodic Protection of Tank Farm Transfer Piping, CCN 258399 (BNI 2013b) and Double Containment Piping for Waste Transfer Specification, 31269-16-2-010 (WRPS 2017a).

The treated LAW feed transfer pipeline is independent of the transfer pipelines used to provide feed from the TF to the Pretreatment Facility.

See Table 1 and Table 2 of this ICD for the physical characteristics and design parameters of the new sections of the treated LAW feed transfer pipeline associated with direct LAW feed.

Each contractor constructs and tests their respective sections of the transfer pipeline according to approved procedures, approved permits, and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303, including code equivalency evaluations as required, to minimize interference during installation of pipelines and supporting system.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 2


The Specific Administrative Contol (SAC) 5.8.8, Waste Transfer System Freeze Protection, as required by Tank Farms Technical Safety Requirements, HNF-SD-WM-TSR-006, (WRPS 2017g) requires air temperature monitoring for physically connected buried/bermed waste transfer piping, and implemented in accordance with Tank Farm Operations Administrative Controls, HNF-IP-1266 (WRPS 2017d). Except for buried/bermed waste transfer primary piping where a documented evaluation demonstrates there is no freezing hazard, air temperature monitoring is required in the primary piping encasements to ensure this temperature is > 32 °F (WRPS 2017d). One of the exemptions from this requirement is waste transfer primary piping covered by an equivalent of ≥ 3 ft of soil to the top of the pipe. This freeze protection requirement also applies to the buried/bermed piping in the transfer system installed by the WTP Contractor. Currently all treated LAW feed transfer piping is installed at a depth greater than 3 ft and in compliance by the stated exemption.

SAC 5.8.8 Waste Transfer System Freeze Protection also implements air temperature monitoring for waste transfer-associated structures (e.g., valve pits) that are physically connected to a waste transfer pump (WRPS 2017d). During waste transfer operation, air temperature monitoring in the physically connected waste transfer-associated structures is required to ensure that the temperature of components located in the structures is > 32 °F. The same freeze protection requirement also applies to the waste transfer-associated structures in the transfer system installed by the WTP Contractor. Current design does not include any waste transfer-associated structures subject to the environment.

LAW Feed Transfer System

The LAW feed transfer system is defined as the transfer pumps, piping materials, valves, and instrumentation that provide transport of treated LAW feed to the WTP Contractor’s Concentrate Receipt Vessels (CRVs), from the LAWPS lag storage tanks. Figure 1 below is representative of the transfer path and depicts the physical interface, located underground (Node 13) at the WTP fence line. Treated LAW feed is pumped from one of three LAWPS lag storage tanks, which use a fill, sample, and feed operational scheme. The lag storage tanks are expected to require approximately four days to empty during WTP processing operations.

Figure 1 DFLAW Feed Transfer Interface

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 3


The treated LAW feed transfer system includes existing pipelines and valves in the LAW Facility, which have an established design pressure of 150 psig at a design temperature of 150 °F (Design Pressure and Design Temperature Calculation for LCP System, 24590-LAW-MEC-LCP-00002, [BNI 2016h]). All new components to be installed in the LAW feed transfer system should meet or exceed this condition while meeting requirements of ASME B31.3.

Because of the existing LAW pipelines and valves, the maximum operating pressure of the transfer system on the WTP side of the interface is limited to 136 psig during transfer of fluids between the TOC and the WTP Contractor under normal conditions. This value provides a minimum 10% design pressure margin for WTP piping systems (Design Parameters & Test Pressures for Equipment & Piping, 24590-WTP-3DG-M40T-00001, [BNI 2017c]). Assurance that this limit will not be exceeded is achieved through design or code-compliant relief devices.

Actuation of process valves are typically controlled closure (slow to close) type. The avoidance of the rapid actuation of transfer system valves can be incorporated into transfer system operation, as to avoid conditions that could lead to water hammer; this may include any valves that have a fail-close action. Common engineering practice is to perform a transient analysis of the design at operating conditions when water-hammer is a concern. In addition, anti-siphoning measures will be implemented for the transfer process. Specifically, a vacuum breaker will be installed at LAWPS to avoid siphoning at the low point drain vessel.

The treated LAW feed transfer lines should be designed to allow differential movement between the carrier pipe and the encasement pipe sub assemblies. A minimum number of fittings should be used, since each fitting contributes to the total turbulence present. Increased turbulence can increase the level of backmixing between the treated LAW feed and the flush water. Elbows should be long-radius (i.e. five times the diameter or greater). Block valves should be full-flow plug valves. Tees should be oriented for normal flow through the run of the tee.

As stated in the Operations Requirements Document, 24590-WTP-RPT-OP-01-001 (BNI 2017b), WTP transfer pipelines have the provision to pneumatically test both primary and secondary lines for leakage. As required, they have on-line primary containment leak detection capability. Pipelines carrying contaminated (or potentially contaminated) liquid should be designed to be fully drainable and flushable to accommodate decommissioning (BNI 2017b).

Interface Controls and Monitoring

As discussed in Section 2.6.1, the TOC and the WTP Contractor will prepare a detailed procedure for transferring treated LAW feed into the WTP Contractor’s feed receipt system. This detailed transfer procedure will detail the utilization of permissive signals associated with the readiness of LAWPS to initialize transfer and WTP’s readiness to receive treated LAW feed transfer and flush sequences. The procedure will also convey instruction on operator signals monitored during transfers and the availability and implementation of interlocks for termination of process transfers.

The TOC and the WTP Contractor provide monitoring information for their respective transfer lines and feed tank/feed receipt systems for incorporation into the TF Monitoring and Control System. Shared contractor control and monitoring signals associated with the transport of treated LAW feed will be transmitted via Process Field Bus (PROFIBUS) communication over a fiber optic connection and will be connected at Node 18, the telecommunications interface point (BNI 2016a). The interface termination box(es) will be standard NEMA 4 or 4x enclosure(s) and will be provided by the TOC at the

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 4


telecommunications interface node. The TOC will operate and maintain the interface termination box(es).

Shared Interface Data

Once operational, the LAWPS Process Control System (PCS) interfaces with the WTP Integrated Control Network (ICN) to coordinate transfer of waste (including flushing) from the LAWPS lag storage tanks to the WTP LAW Facility Concentrate Receipt Vessels (CRVs). Figure 2 below describes pertinent operator data to be monitored by each facility’s control room. Based on predefined states of system components monitored by the LAWPS and the WTP, readiness to transfer treated LAW feed will be achived. During the transfer process, the available WTP Contractor data inputs to the interlock signal may include leak detection, vessel level, valve alignment, or other relevant process information. If an upset condition is detected, initiation of an interlock will occur and result in the immediate stop of the transfer or flush pump, thus halting the in-progress transfer and establishing a fail-safe condition. Preliminary shared process control and monitoring data required for the safe transport of treated LAW feed is explored in greater detail in Appendix F of this document.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 5


Figure 2 DFLAW Data Sources

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 6


Interface Maintenance and Operation

The WTP Contractor operates and maintains the feed transfer line and leak detection system from the WTP site boundary located at interface Node 13 (BNI 2016a) to the WTP Contractor’s LAW CRVs. The TOC operates and maintains the feed transfer line and leak detection system from the TF to the WTP site boundary (interface Node 13 [BNI 2016a]). The TOC and the WTP Contractor will coordinate the leak detection approach to support permit requirements.

The WTP Contractor operates and maintains the instrumentation signal lines from the WTP site boundary located at interface Node 18 (BNI 2016a) to the WTP Contractor’s control room. The TOC operates and maintains the instrumentation signal lines from the TF control room to the WTP site boundary at interface Node 18 (BNI 2016a).

Transfer Pipeline Completion and Testing

The sequence for the final LAW feed transfer pipeline connection is dependent on the milestone activities stated in Section 2.2.1.1. It is expected that the WTP contractor will complete the WTP section of the transfer line prior to the LAWPS section. Additionally, work completion milestones and resource availability for each contractor are not expected to align in a manner that will facilitate joint integrity testing.

The approach for transfer piping completion and testing is that each contractor will independently construct and perform pressure testing and any nondestructive examination (NDE) for the side of the interface they are obligated to complete (i.e. WTP will construct the WTP side of the interface). The first contractor to the complete a pipeline to the interface will cap the encasement line a short distance past the interface point to afford the second team access for preparation and performance of the closure welds. As stated above, the completion of the first section includes any integrity testing dictated by ASME B.31.3. The second team to construct to the interface chronologically will perform the closure weld and the necessary NDE to complete the tie-in of the second portion of the line, after they have performed integrity testing on their constructed section in accordance with AMSE B.31.3. Additionally, as a necessary safety measure, the final tie-in which completes the transfer pipeline and joins WTP and LAWPS process operations will not be performed until the WTP has received CD-4 approval from ORP.

Table 1 New Primary (Inner) Pipe

Line Number Design Pressure (psig) (Notes 1 & 2)

Design Temperature (°F) (Note 3)

TF WTP TF WTP TF WTP

ITS-3”-SN-641-P7/P8

DEP-PB-00009-S32B-03 620 150 200 150

Pipe Characteristic TF WTP

Pipe Code6 / Pipe Class P7 (Note 5)

S32B (Pipe Class) (BNI 2013a)

Nominal Pipe Size (Inch) 3 (Note 4) 3

Pipe Material ASTM A 312, Grade TP 316L ASTM A 312, Grade TP 316L (S32B)

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 7


Pipe Construction Seamless

Pipe Schedule 40S

Notes:

1 The pipe materials selected for purchase by the WTP Contractor and TOC are intended to be equivalent. Any design temperature and pressure differences shown in the tables above do not alter the pipe selection. Stated design criteria are as determined by each facility engineering design organization and does not indicate acceptance of, or intent to, operate the feed transfer line at conditions exceeding 136 psig at 140 °F.

2 Shop and field testing of the inner pipe will be performed in accordance with ASME B31.3, Section 345, Testing.

3 WTP design pressure and temperature are from 24590-BOF-M6C-LCP-00001 (BNI 2016d).

4 TF nominal pipe size from 31269-21-CALC-0032 (WRPS 2016a).

5 TF Pipe Code 31269-16-2-001, Rev 0, Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, Piping Material Specifications. 6 For further clarification it should be noted that WTP’s Code of Record is ASME B31.3 1996, LAWPS’ Code of Record is ASME B31.3

2004.

Table 2 New Encasement Pipe

Line Number Design/Pneumatic Test

Pressure (psig) (Notes 1, 2, & 3)

Design Temperature (°F)

TF WTP TF WTP TF WTP

ITS-3”-SN-641-P7/P8

DEP-PB-00009-S32B-03 50/55 50/55* 150 150

Pipe Characteristic TF WTP

Pipe Code5 / Pipe Class P8 (Note 4)

S32B (Pipe Class) (BNI 2013a)

Nominal Pipe Size (Inch) 6 6

Exterior Insulation Thickness (Inch_) 1.5 ± 0.5 (WRPS under development)

Minimum 1.5 (BNI 2010a)

Pipe Material ASTM A 106, Grade B (P8) ASTM A 106, Grade B (S32B)

Pipe Construction Seamless

Pipe Schedule Standard Weight

Notes:

1 Pneumatic test pressure for the WTP encasement pipe is limited to 110% of design pressure by ASME B31.3-1996, Section 345.5.4, Test Pressure (ASME B31.3-1996). *CCN 275008 (14-WTP-0224, BNI 2014c) documents ORP-WTP approval for pneumatic testing of WTP encasement pipe.

2 The pipe materials selected for purchase by the WTP Contractor and TOC are intended to be equivalent. Both the WTP Contractor and TOC have calculations that verify that the encasement pipe will not pressurize (Time to Pressurize Transfer Pipe’s Annular Volume, 24590-PTF-M0C-10-00005, [BNI 2005]; and Hanford 200 Area Intra Tank Farm and Cross-Site Transfer Line Encasement Piping Design Pressure Analysis LBB Technical Evaluation, RPP-12094 [CH2 2002]).

3 Shop and field testing of the encasement pipe will be performed in accordance with ASME B31.3, Section 345, Testing.

4 TF Pipe Code (31269-16-2-001, Rev 0, Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, Piping Material Specifications).

5 For further clarification it should be noted that WTP’s Code of Record is ASME B31.3 1996, LAWPS’ Code of Record is ASME B31.3 2004.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 8


Retesting

Any retesting of the completed DFLAW transfer line will be based upon WTP design criteria and performed in accordance with ASME B31.3. For example, a hydrotest of a portion of the line in repair would be pressurized to 225 psig (1.5 x 150 psig). 2.2 Administrative Interfaces

The respective organizations’ design requirements include integrated safety management principles and are communicated through the interface in the requirements documents (for example, safety analysis reports), which will be identified in Section 2.4, as available.

No new hazards or accident scenarios are expected to be introduced through this interface that are not adequately controlled by the interface contractors and by controls placed across this interface. The physical and administrative controls to mitigate these risks using a graded approach will be adequately addressed through requirements on each contractor’s authorization basis.

The ICD team has not identified any deactivation or reliability, availability, maintainability, and inspectability (RAMI) considerations that require management across the interface. Systematic RAMI assessments of this interface have not been conducted.

Interface Schedule

The approved baseline schedules for the TOC and the WTP Contractor contain the interface milestones and integrated schedule for this ICD. Activity IDs referenced are from the respective contractor’s approved baseline.

Milestone 30 A - Construct LAW Feed Transfer Line

This baseline milestone represents planned construction completion. For the WTP Contractor, the milestone indicates the line is available for the final connection. For the TOC, it represents the planned activity for completing the interface connection with the line provided.

Table 3 Milestone 30 A

Contractor Activity ID Title

WTP 4BB1000020 BOF - Construct DFLAW Feed Transfer Line

TOC TBD Construct DFLAW Feed Transfer Line

Milestone 30 B – Initial Transfer of Treated LAW Feed

This milestone represents the planned activity to begin transfer of treated LAW feed to the WTP LAW Facility. For the TOC, it represents the planned activity to begin transfer of treated LAW feed to the WTP Contractor. For the WTP Contractor, it represents the planned activity to begin hot commissioning of the LAW Facility.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 9


Table 4 Milestone 30 B

Contractor Activity ID Title

WTP 5HLC3JA00380 LAW-OPS-Perform Transfer Line Tie-In and Waste Delivery

TOC 1T2175 Begin transfer of treated LAW feed (KDH)

LAW Feed Transfer Scheduling

The WTP Contractor, the TOC, and ORP jointly maintain a transfer plan and schedule for multi-year scheduling of DFLAW feed campaigns1 and batch2 transfers to the LAW Facility. This plan and schedule will provide enough detail to implement the long-term planning provided by the One System organization. (See Section 2.2.4.) The transfer plan and schedule shall identify DFLAW feed campaign transfers far enough in advance to allow the design, construction, and startup of any new infrastructure required by either contractor to meet the requirements of the plan and schedule.

Mission Planning Integration

To ensure integration of the TOC and the WTP Contractor operations, the One System organization, as described in the One System Charter, RPP-51471 (WRPS 2017f), develops and maintains the baseline strategy, plan and schedule for the overall ORP Mission. One System facilitates the establishment of feed vectors associated with DFLAW feed campaigns to be delivered as treated LAW feed based on ORP mission priorities. The TOC is responsible for development of DFLAW feed delivery planning documents that establish DFLAW feed campaigns and feed vectors in coordination with WTP process modeling functions, to ensure compatability and integration of assumptions with WTP facility design. ORP transmits the selected DFLAW feed vectors to the WTP Contractor for evaluation. The WTP Contractor evaluates the selected feed vectors in accordance with the WTP Contract (BNI 2000) Section C, Standard 2 (b)(3) and will provide inputs prior to establishing feed vectors and DFLAW feed campaigns.

The current feed vector represented in 24590-WTP-RPT-ENV-16-001 (RPP-RPT-58656), Rev 0, Feed Vector Development in Support of WTP Environmental Risk Activities (BNI 2016j) has been accepted by ORP as reasonable for use by DFLAW; this feed vector is based on 100% recycle of EMF concentrate (BNI 2017d). Any changes to feed vector selection includes ORP oversight for improving the projected feed compositions and processability.

Commissioning

The WTP Contract (BNI 2000) provides requirements for accomplishing commissioning. The WTP Contractor and the TOC coordinate through the One System interface to ensure that treated LAW feed is safely transferred to WTP to support safe and efficient processing during commissioning.

1 A campaign is defined as all of the batches of treated LAW feed delivered to the WTP LAW Facility from a single qualified

DST via LAWPS. 2 A batch is defined as a discrete volume of qualified treated LAW feed transferred from a single LAWPS lag storage tank to a

LAW Facility CRV as a volume fraction of a campaign via LAWPS.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 10


Commissioning may include a series of integrated tests of LAW feed delivery and receipt systems, including transfer of water from TF to WTP prior to initiating the first treated LAW feed transfer. Details for these tests will be developed as part of the commissioning program development.

Direct Feed LAW Hot Operations

The current TOC baseline waste feed delivery plan for DFLAW hot operations is based upon the RPP-40149-VOL1,VOL2 & VOL3, Integrated Waste Feed Delivery Plan, Volume 1,2,& 3 (WRPS 2017e).

The treated LAW feed will be transferred in batches of up to 9115 gallons per CRV. This transfer also includes a small portion of the volume used for post-transfer flushing (Section 2.6.2). The TOC plans to transfer LAW feed batches to fill the WTP Contractor’s CRVs in optimum practical quantities to meet the amount of treated LAW feed requested by the WTP Contractor.

2.3 Acceptance Criteria

To ensure adherence to applicable safety, permitting, and technical bases of the TOC LAWPS and the WTP LAW Facility, 24590-WTP-PD-RAEN-EN-0008/RPP-RPT-59314, Integrated Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste Feed Qualificication Program Description was jointy developed (BNI 2017a / WRPS 2017b). The program and the documentation that define it are in alignment with this ICD-30. The Integrated Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste Feed Qualification Program Description expands on the interface information provided herein to provide a succint overview of the Integrated Feed Qualification Program.

Table 5 and Table 6 summarize the constituents and properties requiring quantification for feed acceptance. Table 6 contains a subset of these parameters that are the treated LAW feed acceptance criteria. The initial data collection requirements for treated LAW feed acceptance is documented in 24590-LAW-RPT-PENG-16-003 / RPP-RPT-59494, Integrated DFLAW Feed Qualification Data Quality Objectives (BNI 2016e / WRPS 2016d) which is referred to in this ICD as the DFLAW DQO.

Table 5 provides a listing of constituent source documents that apply to the treated LAW feed. The constituents listed in the source documents include those that are described in the Regulatory Data Quality Objectives Optimization Report, 24590-WTP-RPT-MGT-04-001 (BNI 2004), and the constituents found in the WTP Contract (BNI 2000) Specification 7 that are not listed specifically in Table 6. The data for the constituents in Table 5 are required for reporting and (or) processability purposes, including compliance assessment. Therefore, the values stated for the constituents represented within the source documents given in Table 5 are not actionable limits and are separate from the feed acceptance criteria as used in this ICD. However, the determination and reporting of the values for the constituents in Table 5 will follow the same quality assurance/quality control process as the determination of the values in Table 6 as described in the DFLAW DQO.

Table 5 DFLAW Feed Constituents for Reporting Purposes

Constituents Notes Reference

Constituents in the Regulatory Data Quality Objectives Optimization Report N/A BNI 2004

Specification 7 list of constituents and concentrations 1 BNI 2000

Total radioactivity in material fed to WTP per year from external sources 2 Health 2006

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 11


Notes: 1. Tables TS-7.1 and TS-7.2 in the WTP Contract (BNI 2000) list chemical and radionuclide components for LAW. The

concentrations apply to the soluble fraction only. 2. The limit is an accumulated value per year. The WTP Contractor is responsible to track the cumulative value based on

treated LAW feed batch analytical results.

Table 6 provides the compositional limits for Envelope E as described in the WTP Contract, Specification 7, Section 7; Table 6 provides the basis for acceptance of treated LAW feed.

The TOC filtration system will provide equivalent performance to a sintered metal filter with a media grade of 5 (see Interface Control Form (ICF) 24590-WTP-ICF-MGT-17-0002 Strategy Meeting, CCN 300509, [BNI 2017f]).

Prior to the first batch transfer of treated LAW feed from a LAWPS lag storage tank, the TOC will provide sampling results from the LAWPS lag storage tank to confirm satisfactory operation of the LAWPS (Section 2.5.1.3) to the WTP Contractor. The design of LAWPS lag storage system allows up to four days for sample qualification. The schedule required for process steps involving sampling, acceptance, and subsequent release of a batch to WTP for processing are to be developed based upon the results of current work confirming the WTP batch processing timeframe as stated.

The WTP Contractor accepts the treated LAW feed based upon DFLAW feed associated with each campaign and treated LAW feed sample data obtained for comparison to the feed acceptance criteria, after ensuring that data was obtained in accordance with DFLAW DQO requirements. This approach includes sample re-analyses or analyses of additional samples or both. If the treated LAW feed (prior to transfer to WTP) does not meet the feed acceptance criteria, alternative actions as described in the DFLAW DQO shall be taken. No transfers may take place until the WTP Contractor has reviewed the analytical results.

If the treated LAW hot commissioning feed is compliant with the feed acceptance criteria specified in Table 6 of this ICD, the WTP Contractor will provide ORP with the analytical results and a written recommendation to accept DFLAW feed campaign prior to the transfer date for the first batch of the campaign. ORP will review the recommendation and authorize transfers of treated LAW hot commissioning feed for the entire DFLAW hot commissioning feed campaign.

If the treated LAW feed does not comply with the feed acceptance criteria, the TOC, with support from the WTP Contractor, will prepare an assessment and recommendation for the preferred method(s), if possible and practical, to correct any feed composition or property deficiencies. During hot commissioning, ORP review and approval of the path forward assessment and recommendation is required. Subsequently, this may require an adjustment to the transfer date for the first batch of the campaign.

If a batch of treated LAW feed is found to be noncompliant after transfer to the LAW CRV (Section 2.5.1.5), the WTP Contractor, with support from the TOC, will prepare an assessment and recommendation to disposition the transferred feed. During hot commissioning, the assessment will be submitted to ORP for review and approval.

Criticality Specification

Criticality safety for DFLAW is described in the Criticality Safety Evaluation Report for Direct Feed to the Low-Activity Waste Facility, 24590-WTP-CSER-NS-16-0001 (DFLAW CSER) (BNI 2016f). The

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 12


DFLAW CSER provides analysis to demonstrate that a single parameter limit for plutonium and a single limit for fissile uranium will ensure criticality safety for DFLAW operation. In the DFLAW CSER, waste evaluation parameters that are conservative to the values in Table 6 were used to demonstrate criticality safety. By verifying that the treated LAW feed meets the acceptance limits of Table 6, the DLFAW CSER requires no additional controls to ensure criticality safety.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 13


Table 6 Treated LAW Feed Acceptance Criteria

Property Limit Notes Reference17

Stream Properties

Feed pH > 12 1 DOE 2015 (BNI 2009c)

WTP feed receipt temperature < 140 °F N/A DOE 2015 (BNI 2010c)

Feed viscosity ≤ 15 cP 2 DOE 2015 (BNI 2016g)

Suspended solids concentration ≤ 3.4 wt% 3, 4, 5 DOE 2015 (BNI 2010d)

Feed bulk density < 1.35 kg/L 6 DOE 2015 (WRPS 2017c)

Hydrogen generation rate < 8.5E-07 g-mol H2/L/hr @140 °F N/A DOE 2015 (BNI 2010c)

Waste compatibility < ± 20 °C 7 DOE 2015 (Ecology 2017)

Liquid fraction unit dose < 1030 Sv/L N/A DOE 2015 (BNI 2014a)

Separable organics No visual immiscible layer 8 DOE 2015 (DOE 2013)

Chemical Components

Sodium concentration ≥ 5 M and ≤ 8 M 9 DOE 2015 (BNI 2014b, BNI 2004b)

Chloride (Cl) ratio < 3.7E-02 mol/mol sodium 18 DOE 2015 (BNI 2000 Envelope A)

Fluoride (F) ratio < 9.1E-02 mol/mol sodium 18 DOE 2015 (BNI 2000 Envelope A)

Sulfate (SO4) ratio < 7.0E-02 mol/mol sodium 10 DOE 2015 (BNI 2000 Envelope A)

Mercury (Hg) ratio < 1.4E-05 mol/mol sodium 11 DOE 2015 (BNI 2000)

Total organic carbon concentration < 10 wt% N/A DOE 2015 (Ecology 2017)

Ammonia (NH3) concentration < 0.04 M N/A DOE 2015 (BNI 2006)

PCB concentration < 50 ppm N/A DOE 2015 (Ecology 2017)

Radionuclides

Cesium-137 ratio < 3.18E-05 Ci/mol sodium 12 DOE 2015 (BNI 2014b)

Europium-154 concentration < 1.8E-05 Ci/L 5 (BNI 2012b)

Cobalt-60 concentration < 1.1E-06 Ci/L 5 (BNI 2012b)

Strontium-90 ratio < 1.19E-03 Ci/mol sodium 13 DOE 2015 (BNI 2000)

Technetium-99 concentration < 4.8E-04 Ci/L 14 DOE 2015 (BNI 2014a)

Plutonium-239 concentration < 3.0E-05 Ci/L N/A DOE 2015 (BNI 2014a)

Uranium-233 concentration < 1.6E-07 Ci/L N/A DOE 2015 (BNI 2014a)

Uranium-235 concentration < 1.7E-09 Ci/L N/A DOE 2015 (BNI 2014a)

TRU ratio < 1.30E-05 Ci/mol sodium 15 DOE 2015 (BNI 2000)

U fissile to U total < 0.96 wt% 5, 16 DOE 2015 (BNI 2016f)

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 14


Table 6 Treated LAW Feed Acceptance Criteria Notes: 1 Limit from Ecology 2017 is >7. Limit of >12 is more restrictive.

2 Analysis is made on the bulk sample after holding the bulk sample at 25 ˚C for 8 hours. Property is measured at 25 ˚C. DFLAW feed value is for a Newtonian fluid.

3 Solids to be measured after holding the bulk sample at 25 ˚C for 8 hours. Definition of suspended solids is provided in Appendix E.

4 The TOC filtration system will provide equivalent performance to a sintered metal filter with a media grade of 5.

5 Concentration value was modified during development of Revision 0 of this ICD. The lower sodium limit was established to support LAW melter throughput.

6 Concentration value represents upper limit of “supernatant” as defined in Waste Transfer, Dilution, and Flushing Requirements, TFC-ENG-STD-26 (WRPS 2017c). This limit reduces the risk of solution near solubility limits with potential for precipitation.

7 Per ASTM Method D5058-90 using 10 mL samples. ASTM D5058 provides standard test practices to screen wastes for potentially hazardous reactions. If, after mixing samples, no reactions are observed and no temperature change outside the specified range is observed, then the waste passes the compatibility test.

8 The proposed deminimus concentration level for separable organics that could be sent to the WTP without adversely affecting the WTP has been accepted by the DOE (Acceptance of Contract Deliverable 2.11, Proposed Deminimus Organic Concentration in Received Tank Waste, CCN 265033 [DOE 2013]).

9 For cesium removal by ion exchange in the LAWPS, the expected operating range of sodium concentration is 5 M to 6 M. The LAW Facility can accept up to 8 M sodium based on limits for melter feed viscosity. The lower sodium limit was established to support LAW melter throughput.

10 Sulfate in the feed is limited, as preliminary model results show that sulfur content has the most impact on reduced waste loading in glass.

11 Value is applied to ensure that WTP air permit emission limits are met.

12 Value is estimated based on 6 M sodium LAW feed and 20 wt% Na2O in the glass at 0.3 Ci/m3 glass loading. The limit of 0.3 Ci/m3 in the ILAW product and called out in Section C.7 (d) (1) (iii) of the WTP Contract (BNI 2000) was developed to support the maintenance concept for the LAW Facility and continues to apply to DFLAW operation.

13 Limited to maximum glass loading of 20 Ci/m3.

14 Limited to maximum glass loading of 3 Ci/m3. The Tc-99 limit shown is based on inhalation dose.

15 Limited to maximum glass loading of 100 nCi/g

16 The total uranium mass, “U total”, is the sum of the 233U, 235U and 238U masses, and the “U fissile” mass is the sum: 235U + 1.4 233U.

17 Unless applicability to Note 5 is given, references in parenthesis are the source of values stated in Transmittal of the Revised Design Inputs for the Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste Initiative, CCN 277593 (DOE 2015). In certain cases, units for the radionuclides were changed from Ci/mole sodium to Ci/L, but the values remained equivalent to the original reference.

18 Halide capture in LAW glass is limited, and excess halides increase the corrosivity of the melter offgas.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 15


2.4 Configuration Management Items

This section identifies the referenced documents that further define the physical and/or administrative details of the interfaces between the TOC and the WTP Contractor. Interface affecting changes to the documents and drawings listed in Table 7, Interface Configuration Management Items will be provided to the affected parties by the responsible Interface Owner.

Table 7 Interface Configuration Management Items

WTP Documents WRPS Documents

24590-WTP-RPT-MGT-04-001, Rev. 0, Regulatory Data Quality Objectives Optimization Report (BNI 2004)

HNF-40122, Rev. 0, WTP Material at Risk Evaluation of Important Uncertainties and Resulting WTP Design Conservatisms (BNI 2009a)

24590-LAW-RPT-PENG-16-003, Rev. 0, Integrated DFLAW Feed Qualification Data Quality Objectives (BNI 2016e)

HNF-4161, Rev. 6, Double Shell Tank Transfer Piping Subsystem Specification (WRPS 2013)

24590-WTP-CSER-NS-16-0001, Rev. 0, Criticality Safety Evaluation Report for Direct Feed to the Low-Activity Waste Facility (BNI 2016f)

HNF-4162, Rev. 5, Double Shell Tank Transfer Pump Subsystem Specification (WRPS 2015)

24590-WTP-PD-RAEN-EN-0008, Rev. 0 Integrated DFLAW Waste Feed Qualification Program Description (BNI 2017a)

HNF-4163, Rev. 6, Double Shell Tank Diluent and Flush Subsystem Specification (WRPS 2011a)

24590-LAW-MEC-LCP-00002, Rev.1. Design Pressure and Design Temperature Calculation for LCP System, (BNI 2016h)

RPP-40149-VOL1,VOL2, & VOL3, Integrated Waste Feed Delivery Plan, Volumes 1, 2, & 3 (WRPS 2017e)

24590-LAW-M6C-LCP-00001, Rev 2. LAW Concentrate Receipt Vessels LCP-VSL-00001/00002 Sizing (BNI 2017e)

TFC-ENG-STD-26, Rev C-4, Waste Transfer, Dilution, and Flushing Requirements (WRPS 2017c).

24590-LAW-MVC-LCP-00002 LAW Concentrate Receipt Process System (LCP) Data, Rev 2. (2016g)

RPP-SPEC-56967, Rev 6, Project T5L01 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Specification, (WRPS 2016c)

WTP Drawings WRPS Drawings

24590-WTP-B2-C12T-00001, Rev 3, Interface Control Drawing (BNI 2016a) (under development)

24590-BOF-P3-DEP-PB00009001, Rev 0, DEP-PB-00009-S32B-3 - Balance of Facilities Isometric (BNI 2016b)

24590-BOF-P3-DEP-PB00009051, Rev 0, DEP-PB-00009-S32B-6 - Balance of Facilities Isometric (BNI 2016c)

24590-BOF-M6-RLD-00012002, Rev 0, P&ID-BOF Radioactive Liquid Wastew Disposal System Underground Transfer Lines (BNI 2016i)

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 16


2.5 Sampling and Analysis

This ICD will continue be updated to align with the integrated sampling and analysis plans as they are further defined.

Sampling

As stated in the Integrated Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste Feed Qualificication Program Description, the WTP Contractor and the TOC will develop a Tank Sampling and Analysis Plan (TSAP) to include the double-shell tank (DST) and LAWPS lag storage vessels.

Tank Sampling and Analysis Plan

The procedures and requirements for performing acceptance criteria analyses using the DFLAW feed and treated LAW feed samples are described in the DFLAW DQO. The DFLAW DQO and the TSAP require input from the WTP Contract specifications, the TOC Requirements, and from the Regulatory Data Quality Objectives Optimization Report (BNI 2004).

A TSAP is to be developed based on the DFLAW DQO to sample each staged feed campaign in support of a decision to transfer and accept the staged feed. In addition to meeting the sampling designs specified in this DQO, the TSAP may include the following information, as appropriate:

Sample locations (e.g., riser and depths for the DFLAW Qualification Tank), sample quantity, and sample handling

If an additional sample is required to check for separable organics, that sample is only used for this test

Sample integrity requirements (e.g., sample labeling, chain-of custody, special sample handling, holding times)

Information for shipping radioactive samples

Requirements for receiving and initial handling of the samples by the laboratory

Subsampling and/or compositing in the laboratory for analyses

Suggested analytical methods for analysis

Unit operations testing for processability, as required

Data reporting requirements

Change control requirements

A Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) is to be developed based on the DFLAW DQO to sample treated feed in the lag storage tanks.

For recurring sampling of the same tank, a standing TSAP or SAP may be prepared for each staged or treated feed tank to realize efficiencies in sample document preparation. The standing TSAP or SAP contains requirements that do not change from campaign to campaign or batch to batch (e.g., analyses, QA/QC, data reporting requirements). The requirements that change with each campaign or batch (e.g., sample identification numbers, sample locations) will be developed as needed.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 17


DFLAW Campaign Sampling

The TOC will sample the DFLAW qualification DST and provide sample analysis results to the WTP Contractor prior to an agreed-upon transfer date for the first batch of each campaign; the standard timeframe in which analysis results will be provided to the WTP from LAWPS will be determined at a future date, as jointly prepared sampling and analysis documentation is further developed. After recirculation occurs, the DFLAW qualification DST will be sampled by the TOC using a grab sample method to collect five samples of equal volume.

For compliance with the WTP Dangerous Waste Permit (DWP) (Ecology 2017), the TOC will ensure that treated LAW feed does not carry waste codes D001 (ignitability) and D003 (reactivity) when transferred to the LAW Facility. Characterization will be performed on the DFLAW qualification DST prior to transfer to the LAWPS feed DST in conformance with the data quality objectives identified in the DFLAW DQO. The following analyses, at a minimum, will be conducted for each new DFLAW feed campaign in accordance with the methods prescribed in WAC 173-303-110: ammonia, pH, metals, organic acids, mercury, cyanide, volatiles, semi-volatiles, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)/pesticides, anions, total organic carbon, and compatibility (ASTM Method D5058-90).

The DFLAW DQO outlines an integrated approach which is to focus on an initial, comprehensive sampling event that collects samples to obtain sufficient and necessary data for qualifying the staged feed. The DQO development was based on acceptance criteria and processing requirements for the LAWPS and for LAW Facility operations. Inputs from existing data and historical information have been taken into account for determining the required data collection.

A “new campaign” is one that has been sampled and analyzed in accordance with the DFLAW DQO and has received no further additions. Currently, further additions require the resampling and reanalysis unless an exception is approved by Ecology on a case-by-case basis. Water additions and (or) flushes for the purposes of waste transfer are not considered additions when complying with the DWP.

Treated LAW Feed Sampling

The sampling and analysis of lag storage tanks as described in this section are intended to provide corroborative evidence in combination with previously acquired campaign characterization, that treated LAW feed batches meet WTP WAC. Batch historical data will be collected during each campaign to document LAWPS process operations consistency and in-line radiation monitoring performance. It is expected that as each campaign progresses, LAWPS will provide a consistent output that will afford the elimination or reduction of sampling based on acquired historical data.

The TOC will sample each lag storage tank volume of treated LAW feed from the LAWPS lag storage tanks to provide verification of adequate performance of the LAWPS process. Sample analysis results will be delivered to and accepted by the WTP Contractor prior to transfer of a qualified batch of treated LAW feed to the LAW Facility. Sample analysis results will be compared to and used in conjunction with the sample analysis results of the DFLAW feed campaign for acceptance and transfer of the feed. Feed from the sampled LAWPS lag storage tank cannot be transferred until the WTP Contractor has reviewed and accepts the analysis results. The treated LAW feed will be sampled and analyzed to verify compliance with the limits provided in Table 6; specifically the following characteristics:

Cs-137 activity, expressed as a ratio to sodium present.

Transuranic elements (TRU) activity, expressed as a ratio sodium present. Unless the limit has been satisfied from the DFLAW campaign feed sample analysis. Gross alpha is acceptable in place of a complete isotopic analysis.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 18


Total organic carbon concentration.

pH.

Concentration of suspended solids.

Additional Batch Samples

The TOC will provide samples of treated LAW feed to the WTP Contractor to analyze for feed blending and process control.

WTP LAW Feed Receipt Sampling

In the event of a process upset that could impact the treated LAW feed composition, the WTP Contractor may sample and analyze the feed batch from the WTP LAW CRV to determine whether it complies with the treated LAW feed acceptance criteria. If, after sampling and analysis, the WTP Contractor determines that the feed transferred to the WTP LAW CRV is out of compliance, the WTP Contractor will follow the actions listed in Section 2.3.

Sample Analysis

Once the qualification DST sample (campaign) has been provided by the TOC, the DFLAW feed qualification laboratory performs analyses to determine feed acceptance. The feed qualification laboratory will also analyze the LAWPS-treated LAW feed sample from the lag storage tanks prior to transfer. As previously stated, the sample analysis/verification of lag storage tank contents is limited to the properties and constituents in Section 2.5.1.3.

The sample volume, number of samples, required analyses, and quality of data required for the treated LAW feed acceptance criteria are described in the DFLAW DQO.

2.6 Transfer Procedure

Transfer Procedure Requirements

The TOC and WTP Contractor will prepare a detailed procedure for transferring treated LAW feed into the WTP Contractor’s feed receipt system. Appendix D provides draft transfer procedure concepts whose elements could be incorporated in the operating procedure when developed. The draft transfer procedure concepts in Appendix D do not drive requirements on the transfer process; instead, concepts and preliminary information have been developed and/or presented to help affected disciplines identify and understand the interfaces between the TOC and the WTP Contractor for internal planning purposes. As preliminary information, it is subject to change through further refinement as the project matures.

Pipeline Flushing Requirements

Since treated LAW feed is not expected to contain insoluble solids, flush liquid is used to push feed in the transfer pipeline to the LAW CRV. Following the transfer of feed to the WTP Contractor’s LAW CRV, the TOC will initiate a single post-transfer flush. The volume of water used for the flush is determined by the next planned transfer of feed.

If the next transfer of feed is expected in less than 72 hours, the TOC will flush the transfer pipeline with a volume of water that is at a minimum, equal to the transfer pipeline volume.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 19


If the next transfer of feed is expected to be more than 72 hours later, then the TOC will flush the transfer pipeline with a volume of water that is at least 1.5 times the transfer pipeline volume (Waste Transfer, Dilution, and Flushing Requirements, TFC-ENG-STD-26 [WRPS 2017c]).

The WTP design constrains the total volume of flush water that can be received in a 48 hour period to a maximum of 4,500 gallons.

The flush water flow rate should not be less than the actual feed transfer flow rate. The WTP Contractor will limit the amount of flush water to the LAW CRV by monitoring total flow and density to detect the end of feed transfer and the beginning of flushing. When the flush water first reaches the CRV, the WTP Contractor will align valves to stop delivery to the CRV and send flush water to the low point drain vessel in the WTP effluent management facility (EMF). When the flow of flush water is stopped, the TOC isolates the transfer pipeline from connected equipment, and the WTP Contractor drains the contents of the pipeline to the low point drain vessel.

When a portion of the transfer pipeline flush water is combined with the feed, the composition of the feed batch is expected to remain compliant with the limits established in Table 6, except that the sodium concentration may decrease. The TOC will communicate the post-transfer flush volume delivered to WTP. The WTP Contractor will document the volume of flush water received. The contractors will reconcile differences in the recorded volumes to allow the WTP Contractor to confirm water volumes delivered to the EMF. The WTP Contractor will also report the volume of flush water received.

Transfer Coordination

Prior to the acceptance of a DFLAW feed campaign, both the WTP Contractor and TOC will participate in the development of the LAWPS Tank Sampling and Analysis Plan for each campaign for mutual agreement on sample collection, handling, and analytical requirements as described in Section 2.5.1.1. After acceptance of a DFLAW feed campaign, but before each batch transfer from the TOC to the LAW Facility, the WTP Contractor will transmit a transfer batch sheet to the TOC for acceptance in order to formally convey the requested quantity, route, and other pertinent parameters related to the specific treated LAW feed transfer. The TOC will respond with acceptance or comments on these transfer parameters. The WTP Contractor and TOC agreement of these parameters is a prerequisite for initiating the transfer operation. The contents of this batch sheet will be developed by the WTP Contractor and coordinated with the TOC per the process defined in a future batch processing methodology report developed for DFLAW. Implementing protocols will be developed at a later date. The coordination process and documentation will be prepared jointly by the WTP Contractor and the TOC during the development of the detailed procedure for transferring treated LAW feed into the WTP Contractor’s feed receipt system.

Transfer Process

The coordination of the WTP Contractor and the TOC to perform a sequence of events for the successful transfer of treated LAW feed from LAWPS to the WTP can be summarized as follows:

1. LAWPS PCS notifies the WTP control system that LAWPS has a lag storage tank ready to transfer using the ‘Ready to transfer treated LAW’ signal when a tank is selected for transfer by the LAWPS operations staff.

2. Once the WTP Operations staff are ready, WTP control system sets the ‘Ready to Receive Treated LAW’ signal.

3. LAWPS Operator initiates the automatic transfer and flush for the selected lag tank.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 20


4. The transfer sequence reads the volume required volume from the WTP control system and then starts the transfer.

5. During the transfer of feed, the ‘Transfer in Progress’ signal is on.

6. Once the feed transfer is complete, the flush sequence is initiated.

7. During the flush, the ‘Flush in Progress’ signal is on.

8. Once the flush volume has successfully been transferred, the ‘Transfer Completed Successfully’ signal is sent to WTP.

9. If the transfer or flush sequence did not complete successfully, the ‘Transfer Terminated prematurely’ signal is sent to WTP.

10. If at any time, the ‘Terminate Transfer’ signal is active by the WTP control system and the LAWPS isolation valve is open, the LAWPS PCS will stop / interlock all lag tank pumps and the Treated Process Water pump (used for flushing).

A process flow diagram (Figure 3) and supporting information (Table 10) for a conceptual transfer sequence with key information exchanges is included in Appendix D.

2.7 Treated LAW Feed Transfer Limitations and Requirements

Treated LAW Feed Transfer Limits

Table 8 Treated LAW Feed Transfer Physical Limits

Transfer Property Delivery Parameter

System design pressure for new sections of the transfer pipeline

≥ 150 psig (Section 2.1.1)

System design temperature for new sections of the transfer pipeline ≥ 150 F (Section 2.1.1)

Maximum operating pressure on the WTP side of the interface

≤ 136 psig (Section 2.1.1)

Maximum operating temperature < 140 °F (Table 6)

LAW Feed Transfer Requirements

Treated LAW feed will be delivered at a maximum transfer flow rate of 88 gal/min based on the design capacity of the LAW CRVs (LAW Concentrate Receipt Vessels LCP-VSL-00001/00002 Sizing, 24590-LAW-M6C-LCP-00001 [BNI 2017e]). The maximum batch transfer volume is 9115 gallons (LAW Concentrate Receipt Process System (LCP) Data, 24590-LAW-MVC-LCP-00002 [BNI 2016g]). The batch transfer will be monitored by the WTP Contractor for flow rate, total volume, and density. The batch transfer will be monitored with a radiation monitor at the line to stop the transfer if the measured exposure exceeds limits for the LAW Facility. The WTP Contractor will receive up to a 9115- gallon batch of treated LAW feed and will recieve post-transfer flush from the TOC.

Both contractors will measure the total volumes of treated LAW feed and flush water transferred.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 21


3 WTP Requirements

All requirements identified herein Section 3 are applicable to WTP ONLY.

3.1 Technical Requirements (Design Criteria)

The technical requirements in this Section 3.1 have been identified as applicable to WTP structures, systems and components (SSCs).

Design Authority (RAEG): The transfer line physical interface for the treated LAW feed from the LAWPS to the LAW Facility is located at the WTP site boundary (Node 13) as shown on the Interface Control Drawing, 24590-WTP-B2-C12T-00001 (BNI 2016a). (Section 2.1.1)

Design Authority (RAEG): The WTP Contractor provides monitoring information for their transfer lines and feed tank/feed receipt systemfor incorporation into the TF Monitoring and Control System. (Section 2.1.2)

Design Authority (RAEG): The maximum batch transfer volume is 9115 gallons. (Section 2.7.2). Following the transfer of feed to the WTP Contractor’s LAW CRV, the TOC will initiate a single post-transfer flush (Section 2.6.2). The WTP Contractor will receive up to 9115-gallon batch of treated LAW feed and will receive a post-transfer flush from the TOC. (Section 2.7.2)

Design Authority (RAEG): The interface for the instrumentation signal lines between the WTP Contractor and the TOC is located on the telecommunications pole identified as Node 18, as shown on the Interface Control Drawing, 24590-WTP-B2-C12T-00001 (BNI 2016a). (Section 2.1.1)

Design Authority (RAEG): Specific Administrative Contol (SAC) 5.8.8, Waste Transfer System Freeze Protection from Tank Farm Operations Administrative Controls, HNF-IP-1266 (WRPS 2017d), requires air temperature monitoring for physically connected buried/bermed waste transfer piping. One of the exemptions from this requirement is waste transfer primary piping covered by an equivalent of ≥ 3 ft of soil to the top of the pipe. (Section 2.1.1)

Design Authority (RAEG): The treated LAW feed transfer system will include existing pipelines and valves in the LAW Facility, which have an established design pressure of 150 psig. at a design temperature of 150 °F (24590-LAW-MEC-LCP-00002, Design Pressure and Design Temperature Calculation for LCP System). All new components to be installed in the LAW feed transfer system should meet or exceed this condition while meeting requirements of ASME B31.3. (Section 2.1.1.1)

Design Authority (RAEG): Shared contractor control and monitoring signals associated with the transport of treated LAW feed will be transmitted via PROFIBUS over a fiber optic connection and will be connected at Node 18, the communications interface point. The interface termination box(es) will be standard NEMA 4 or 4x enclosure(s) and will be provided by the TOC at the telecommunications interface node. (Section 2.1.2)

Design Authority (RAEG): During the transfer process, the available WTP Contractor data inputs to the interlock signal may include leak detection, vessel level, valve alignment, or other

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 22


relevant process information. If an upset condition is detected, initiation of an interlock will occur and result in the immediate stop of the transfer or flush pump, thus halting the in-progress transfer and establishing a fail-safe condition. (Section 2.1.3)

Design Authority (RAEG): New primary (inner) pipe – WTP. Pipe class: S32B. Nominal pipe size: 3 inch. Pipe material: ASTM A 312, TP 316L. Pipe Construction: Seamless. Pipe Schedule 40S. (Section 2.1, Table 1)

Design Authority (RAEG): New encasement pipe – WTP. Pipe class: S32B. Nominal pipe size: 6 inch. Pipe material: ASTM A 106, Grade B. Pipe Construction: Seamless. Pipe Schedule Standard Weight. (Section 2.1, Table 2.)

Design Authority (RAEG): Table 6 contains a subset of these parameters that are the treated LAW feed acceptance criteria. Table 6 provide the basis for acceptance of treated LAW feed. (Section 2.3)

Design Authority (RAEG): The flush water flow rate should not be less than the actual feed transfer rate The WTP Contractor will limit the amount of flush water to the LAW CRV by monitoring total flow and density to detect the end of feed transfer and the beginning of flushing. When the flush water first reaches the CRV, the WTP Contractor will align valves to stop delivery to the CRV and send flush water to the low point drain vessel in the WTP EMF. When the flow of flush water is stopped, the TOC isolates the transfer pipeline from connected equipment, and the WTP Contractor drains the contents of the pipeline to the low point drain vessel. (Section 2.6.2)

Design Authority (RAEG): Treated LAW feed will be delivered at a maximum transfer flow rate of 88 gal/min based on the design capacity of the LAW CRVs. (Section 2.7.2)

Design Authority (RAEG ): The batch transfer will be monitored by the WTP Contractor for the following feed properties and conditions: flow rate, total volume (feed and flush), density and radiation level. (Section 2.7.2)

Design Authority (RAEG ): Both contractors will measure the total volumes of treated LAW feed and flush water transferred. (Section 2.7.2)

3.2 Programmatic Requirements

Not applicable.

3.3 Packaging Requirements

Not applicable.

3.4 Activity Level Flow Down Requirements

Activity level flow-down requirements are WTP commissioning, post-commissioning, and maintenance activities that are intended for future implementation.

Operations (RAOP): The TOC and WTP Contractor will prepare a detailed procedure for transferring treated LAW feed into the WTP Contractor’s feed receipt system. (2.6.1)

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 23


Operations (RAOP): The WTP Contractor operates and maintains the feed transfer line and leak detection system from the WTP site boundary at interface Node 13 to the WTP Contractor’s LAW CRVs. The WTP Contractor operates and maintains the instrumentation signal lines from the WTP site boundary at interface Node 18 to the WTP Contractor’s control room. (Section 2.1.4)

Operations (RAOP): The WTP Contractor, with the TOC and ORP, jointly maintains a transfer plan and schedule for multi-year scheduling of DFLAW feed campaigns and batch transfers to the LAW Facility. (Section 2.2.1.3)

Operations (RAOP): The WTP Contractor, with the TOC, will develop a TSAP to include the DFLAW qualification DST and LAWPS lag storage tanks.. (Section 2.5.1.1)

Operations (RAOP): The WTP Contractor accepts the treated LAW feed based upon DFLAW feed associated with each campaign and treated LAW feed sample data obtained for comparison to the feed acceptance criteria, after ensuring that data was obtained in accordance with DFLAW DQO requirements. If the treated LAW hot commissioning feed is compliant with the feed acceptance criteria specified in Table 6 of this ICD, the WTP Contractor will provide ORP with the analytical results and a written recommendation to accept DFLAW feed campaign prior to the transfer date for the first batch of the campaign. (Section 2.3)

If the treated LAW feed does not comply with the feed acceptance criteria, the WTP Contractor supports the TOC assessment and recommendation for the preferred method(s), if possible and practical, to correct any feed composition or property deficiencies. (Section 2.3)

Operations (RAOP): If a batch of treated LAW feed is found to be noncompliant after transfer to the LAW CRV, the WTP Contractor, with support from the TOC, prepares an assessment and recommendation to disposition the transferred feed. During hot commissioning the assessment and recommendation is submitted to ORP for review and approval. (Section 2.3)

Operations (RAOP): The WTP Contractor will document the total volume flush water received per batch and reconcile differences with the transfer volume recorded by the TOC. (Section 2.6.2) Both contractors will measure the total volumes of treated LAW feed and flush water transferred (Section 2.7.2).

Operations (RAOP): In the event of a process upset that could impact the treated LAW feed composition, the WTP Contractor may sample and analyze the feed batch from the WTP LAW CRV to determine whether it complies with the treated LAW feed acceptance criteria. If, after sampling and analysis, the WTP Contractor determines that the feed transferred to the WTP LAW CRV is out of compliance, the WTP Contractor will follow the actions listed in Section 2.3. (Section 2.5.1.5)

Operations (RAOP): After acceptance of DFLAW feed campaign, but before each batch transfer from the TOC to the LAW Facility, the WTP Contractor will transmit a transfer batch sheet to the TOC for acceptance in order to formally convey the requested quantity, route, and other pertinent parameters related to the specific treated LAW feed transfer. The WTP Contractor and TOC agreement of these parameters is a prerequisite for initiating the transfer operation. The contents of this batch sheet will be developed by the WTP Contractor and coordinated with the TOC per the process defined in a future batch processing methodology report developed for DFLAW. Implementing protocols will be developed at a later date. The

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 24


coordination process and documentation will be prepared jointly by the WTP Contractor and the TOC during the development of the detailed procedure for transferring treated LAW feed into the WTP Contractor’s feed receipt system. (2.6.3)

4 Requisite Interface Items

Requisite interface items are those activities that fall outside of the WTP Requirements Management program and are necessary to establish a complete interface.

4.1 Internal Interface Items

Internal requisite interface items are WTP responsibilities that need to be completed prior to operation of the interface.

The WTP Contractor constructs and tests its section of the transfer pipeline according to approved procedures, approved permits, and WAC 173-303, including code equivalency evaluations. (Section 2.1.1)

The WTP Contractor evaluates the selected feed vectors in accordance with the WTP Contract (BNI 2000) Section C, Standard 2 (b)(3) and provides inputs prior to establishing feed vectors and DFLAW feed campaigns. (section 2.2.2)

4.2 External Interface Items

External requisite interface items are TOC and ORP responsibilities that are needed to complete the interface.

The TOC and the WTP Contractor will prepare a detailed procedure for transferring treated LAW feed into the WTP Contractor’s feed receipt system. (Section 2.6.1)

The TOC will coordinate construction activities in accordance with approved procedures, approved permits, and WAC 173-303. (Section 2.1.1)

The transfer line physical interface for the treated LAW feed from the LAWPS to the LAW Facility is located at the WTP site boundary (Node 13) as shown on the Interface Control Drawing, 24590-WTP-B2-C12T-00001 (BNI 2016a). (Section 2.1.1)

The interface for the instrumentation signal lines between the WTP Contractor and the TOC is located on the telecommunications pole identified as Node 18 as shown on the Interface Control Drawing, 24590-WTP-B2-C12T-00001 (BNI 2016a). (Section 2.1.1)

The treated LAW feed transfer system will include existing pipelines and valves in the LAW Facility, which have an established design pressure of 150 psig at a design temperature of 150 °F (24590-LAW-MEC-LCP-00002, Design Pressure and Design Temperature Calculation for LCP System). All new components to be installed in the LAW feed transfer system should meet or exceed the this condition while meeting requirements of ASME B31.3. (Section 2.1.1.1)

The TOC provides monitoring information for their transfer lines and feed tank for incorporation into the TF Monitoring and Control System. (Section 2.1.2)

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 25


Shared contractor control and monitoring signals sassociated with the transport of treated LAW feed will be transmitted via PROFIBUS communication over a fiber optic connection and will be connected at Node 18, the telecommunications interface point. The interface termination box(es) will be standard NEMA 4 or 4x enclosure(s) and will be provided by the TOC at the telecommunications interface node. The TOC will operate and maintain the interface termination boxes. (Section 2.1.2)

The TOC operates and maintains the feed transfer line and leak detection system from the TF to the WTP site boundary at interface Node 13. The TOC operates and maintains the instrumentation signal lines from the TF control room to the WTP site boundary at interface Node 18. (Section 2.1.4)

The TOC, with the WTP Contractor and ORP, jointly maintain a transfer plan and schedule for multi-year scheduling of DFLAW feed campaigns and batch transfers to the LAW Facility. (Section 2.2.1.3)

ORP, with the TOC and the WTP Contractor, jointly maintain a transfer plan and schedule for multi-year scheduling of DFLAW feed campaigns and batch transfers to the LAW Facility. (Section 2.2.1.3)

The TOC is responsible for development of DFLAW feed delivery planning documents that establish DFLAW feed campaigns and feed vectors in coordination with WTP process modeling fumctions, to ensure compatability and integration of assumptions with WTP facility design. (Section 2.2.2)

ORP transmits the selected LAW feed vectors to the WTP Contractor for evaluation. (Section 2.2.2)

The TOC, with the WTP Contractor, will develop a TSAP to include the DFLAW qualification DST and LAWPS lag storage tanks. (Section 2.5.1.1)

The TOC will sample the DFLAW qualification DST and provide sample analysis results to the WTP Contractor prior to an agreed-upon transfer date for the first batch of each campaign. (2.5.1.2)

The TOC will sample each lag storage tank volume of treated LAW feed from the LAWPS lag storage tanks to provide verification of adequate performance of the LAWPS process. Sample analysis results will be delivered to and accepted by the WTP Contractor prior to transfer of a qualified batch of treated LAW of feed to the LAW Facility. (2.5.1.3)

The TOC will provide samples of treated LAW feed to the WTP Contractor to analyze for feed blending and process control. (Section 2.5.1.4)

ORP will review the recommendation and authorize transfers of compliant treated LAW hot commissioning feed for the entire DFLAW campaign. (Section 2.3)

If the treated LAW feed does not comply with the feed acceptance criteria, the TOC, with support from the WTP Contractor, will prepare an assessment and recommendation for the preferred method(s), if possible and practical, to correct any feed composition or property deficiencies. (Section 2.3)

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 26


During hot commissioning, ORP review and approval of the assessment and recommendation of the preferred method(s) to correct any feed composition or property deficiencies is required. (Section 2.3)

If a batch of treated LAW feed is found to be noncompliant after transfer to the LAW CRV, the TOC will support the WTP Contractor in the preparation of the assessment and recommendation to disposition the transferred feed. (Section 2.3)

If a batch of treated LAW feed is found to be noncompliant after transfer to the LAW CRV during hot commissioning, ORP reviews and approves the assessment and recommendation to disposition the transferred feed. (Section 2.3)

TOC will document the post-transfer flush volume transferred to WTP and reconcile differences in the volume recorded by the WTP Contractor. (Section 2.6.2) Both contractors will measure the total volumes of treated LAW feed and flush water transferred. (Section 2.7.2)

Treated LAW feed will be delivered at a maximum transfer flow rate of 88 gal/min based on the design capacity of the LAW CRVs. (Section 2.7.2)

The maximum batch transfer volume is 9115 gallons. Following the transfer of feed to the WTP Contractor’s LAW CRV, the TOC will initiate a single post-transfer flush (Section 2.6.2). The WTP Contractor will receive up to a 9115-gallon batch of treated LAW feed and will receive post-transfer flush from the TOC. (Section 2.7.2)

The TOC filtration system will provide equivalent performance to a sintered metal filter with a media grade of 5. (Section 2.3)

4.3 Interface Responsibility Matrix

The descriptions listed in Table 9 are for reference only. Refer to the listed section numbers for the exact statements of the responsibilities

Table 9 Interface Responsibility Matrix

# Interface Responsibility Description ICD Section Reference

Initiated

WTP TOC ORP

1 Construct and test respective sections of the transfer pipeline according to approved procedures, approved permits, and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303.

2.1.1 4.1.1 4.2.2 N/A

2

The transfer line physical interface for the treated LAW feed from the LAWPS to the LAW Facility is located at the WTP site boundary (Node 13), as shown on the Interface Control Drawing, 24590-WTP-B2-C12T-00001 (BNI 2016a).

2.1.1 3.1.1 4.2.3 N/A

3 The interface for the instrumentation signal lines between the WTP Contractor and the TOC is located on the telecommunications pole identified as Node 18, as shown on the Interface Control Drawing.

2.1.1 3.1.4 4.2.4 N/A

4 Air temperature monitoring is required, unless piping is covered by at least 3 ft of soil.

2.1.1 3.1.5 none N/A

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 27



Initiated

WTP TOC ORP

5 New components in the LAW feed transfer system should meet or exceed a design pressure of 150 psig at a design temperature of 150 °F.

2.1.1.1 3.1.6 4.2.5 N/A

6 Provide monitoring information for the respective transfer lines and feed tank/feed receipt systems to incorporate into the TF Monitoring and Control System.

2.1.2 3.1.2 4.2.6 N/A

7 Control and monitoring signals are transmitted over fiber optic connection. Termination boxes are NEMA 4 or 4x.

2.1.2 3.1.7 4.2.7 N/A

8 An upset condition initiates an interlock to stop transfer or flush. 2.1.3 3.1.8 none N/A

9 Operate and maintain feed transfer line, leak detection systems, and instrumentation signals to the interface.

2.1.4 3.4.2 4.2.8 N/A

10 Inner pipe is 3-inch ASTM A 312, TP 316L, schedule 40S. 2.1 3.1.9 none N/A

11 Encasement pipe is 3-inch ASTM A 106, standard weight. 2.1 3.1.10 none N/A

12 Maintain a transfer plan and schedule for multi-year scheduling of DFLAW feed campaigns and batch transfers to the LAW Facility

2.2.1.3 3.4.3 4.2.9 4.2.10

13 Establish feed vectors and DFLAW feed campaigns to be delivered as feed to the LAW Facility based on contract specifications and mission priorities.

2.2.2 4.1.2 4.2.11 4.2.12

14 Treated LAW insoluble particle size is managed through filtration. 2.3 N/A 4.2.25 N/A

15

The WTP Contractor accepts the treated LAW feed based upon DFLAW feed associated with each campaign and treated LAW feed batch sample data obtained for comparison to the feed acceptance criteria, after ensuring that data was obtained in accordance with DFLAW DQO requirements.

2.3 3.4.5 N/A

N/A

16

If the treated LAW hot commissioning feed is compliant with the feed acceptance criteria specified in Table 4 of this ICD, provide the analytical results and a written recommendation to accept DFLAW feed campaign prior to the transfer date for the first batch of the campaign.

2.3 3.4.5 N/A

4.2.17

17

If the treated LAW feed does not comply with the feed acceptance criteria, prepare an assessment and recommendation for the preferred method(s), if possible and practical, to correct any feed composition or property deficiencies.

2.3 3.4.6 4.2.18 4.2.19

18 If a batch of treated LAW feed is found to be noncompliant after transfer to the LAW CRV, prepare an assessment and recommendation to disposition the transferred feed.

2.3 3.4.7 4.2.20 4.2.21

19 Table 6 contains the treated LAW acceptance criteria. 2.3 3.1.11 none N/A

20 A TSAP is developed based on the DFLAW DQO to sample each staged feed campaign.

2.5.1.1 3.4.4 4.2.13 N/A

21 TOC samples qualification DST and provides results. 2.5.1.2 none 4.2.14 N/A

22 TOC samples lag storage tanks for verification. 2.5.1.3 none 4.2.15 N/A

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 28



Initiated

WTP TOC ORP

23 TOC provides samples of treated LAW feed to WTP. 2.5.1.4 none 4.2.16 N/A

24 In the event of a process upset, WTP Contractor may sample and analyze the feed batch from the LAW CRV.

2.5.1.5 3.4.9 N/A N/A

25 Prepare a detailed procedure for transferring treated LAW feed into the WTP Contractor’s feed receipt system.

2.6.1 3.4.1 4.2.1 N/A

26 Flush water flow rate should not be less than the actual feed transfer rate. Flush is diverted to the low point drain vessel.

2.6.2 3.1.12 none N/A

27 Report volume of flush water. 2.6.2 3.4.8 4.2.22 N/A

28 Transfer is coordinated with a transfer batch sheet. 2.6.3 3.4.10 none N/A

29 Maximum transfer flow rate. 2.7.2 3.1.13 4.2.23 N/A

30 Batch transfer volume and post-transfer flush. 2.6.2

2.7.2 3.1.3 4.2.24 N/A

31 Transfer is monitored by WTP Contractor. 2.7.2 3.1.14 N/A N/A

32 Measure the total volume of treated LAW feed and flush water transferred. 2.7.2

3.1.15 3.4.8

4.2.22 N/A

5 References

ASME B31.3-1996. Process Piping. American Society of Mechanical Engineers International, New York, NY.

ASME B31.3-2004. Process Piping. American Society of Mechanical Engineers International, New York, NY.

ASTM A 106/A 106M. Standard Specification for Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service. American Society for Testing and Materials, Easton, MD.

ASTM A 312/A 312M. Standard Specification for Seamless, Welded, and Heavily Cold Worked Austenitic Stainless Steel Pipes. American Society for Testing and Materials, Easton, MD.

BNI. 2000. Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Contract, Contract No. DE-AC27-01RV14136, as amended, contract between Bechtel National, Inc. and the Department of Energy, Office of River Protection.

BNI. 2004. Regulatory Data Quality Objectives Optimization Report, 24590-WTP-RPT-MGT-04-001, Rev 0. Bechtel National Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2004b. Technical Basis for LAW Vitification Stream Physical and Rheological Property Bounding Conditions, 24590-101-TSA-W000-0004-72-13, Rev 00B. Bechtel National Inc., Richland, WA. BNI. 2005. Time to Pressurize Transfer Pipe’s Annular Volume, 24590-PTF-M0C-10-00005, Rev 0. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 29


BNI. 2006. Meeting Minutes: Develop Specific Administrative Control to Protect PT Facility Hydrogen and Ammonia Generation Rate Assumptions for Waste Feed Vectors, CCN 146787, dated 04 December 2006. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2009a. WTP Material at Risk Evaluation of Important Uncertainties and Resulting WTP Design Conservatisms, CCN 201898 (HNF-40122, Rev. 0), dated 15 July 2009. Joint Task Team document between Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA; CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, WA; and US Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, Richland, WA.

BNI. 2009c. WTP Integrated Processing Strategy Description, 24590-WTP-3YD-50-00002, Rev 1. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2010a. ICD 19, Proposed Table 4 Change, CCN 225697, dated 09 November 2010. Bechtel National Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2010c. Revised Calculation of Hydrogen Generation Rates and Times to Lower Flammability Limit for WTP, 24590-WTP-M4C-V11T-00011, Rev. C. Bechtel National Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2010d. EFRT Issue M3 PJM Vessel Mixing Assessment, Volume 4 - HOP-VSL-00903/904, PWD-VSL-00015/16, TCP-VSL-00001, TLP-VLS-00009A/B, RLD-VSL-00008, 24590-WTP-RPT-ENG-08-021-04, Rev. 1. Bechtel National Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2012b. Estimated Radionuclide Concentrations for Shielding Based on TFCOUP6 Feed Vector, 24590-WTP-M4C-V1IT-00020, Rev. 1 Bechtel National Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2013a. Engineering Specification for Piping Class S32B, 24590-WTP-3PB-P000-TS32B, Rev 25. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2013b. Response to ORP Question on Cathodic Protection of Tank Farm Transfer Piping, CCN 258399, dated 10 July 2013. Bechtel National Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2014a. Updated Unit Dose Factors and Flow Stream Parameters for Use in Safety Analysis Calculations, 24590-WTP-Z0C-W14T-00020, Rev 3, Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2014b. 2014 Direct Feed LAW Draft Waste Acceptance Criteria for Conceptual Design Planning Purposes, CCN 268879, dated 30 May 2014, Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, Washington. Page 6

BNI. 2014c. Response to Bechtel National, Inc., Request to Utilitize Pneumatic Leak Tests For the Stack Discharge Monitoring and Sampling System and Outer Jackets of Double-Encased Pipe, 14-WTP-0224, CCN 275008, dated 10 December 2014. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, Washington.

BNI. 2016a. Interface Control Drawing, 24590-WTP-B2-C12T-00001, Rev 3. Bechtel National Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2016b. DEP-PB-00009-S32B-3 - Balance of Facilities Isometric, 24590-BOF-P3-DEP-PB00009001, Rev 0, Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2016c. DEP-PB-00009-S32B-6 - Balance of Facilities Isometric, 24590-BOF-P3-DEP-PB00009051, Rev 0. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2016d. Pressure, Temperature, and Pipe Size for Transferring Treated LAW Feed from the ICD 30 Interface Point to the EMF and LAW Facility for DFLAW Operations, 24590-BOF-M6C-LCP-00001, Rev A, Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2016e. Integrated DFLAW Feed Qualification Data Quality Objectives, 24590-LAW-RPT-PENG-16-003, Rev 0. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2016f. Criticality Safety Evaluation Report for Direct Feed to the Low-Activity Waste Facility, 24590-WTP-CSER-NS-16-00001, Rev 0. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 30


BNI. 2016g. LAW Concentrate Receipt Process System (LCP) Data, 24590-LAW-MVC-LCP-00002, Rev 2. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2016h. Design Pressure and Design Temperature Calculation for LCP System, 24590-LAW-MEC-LCP-00002, Rev 1. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2016i. P&ID-BOF Radioactive Liquid Waste Disposal System Underground Transfer Lines, Rev 0, 24590-BOF-M6-RLD-00012002, Rev 0. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2016j. One System - Feed Vector Development in Support of WTP Environmental Risk Assessment Activities, 24590-WTP-RPT-ENV-16-001 (RPP-RPT-58656), Rev 0. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2017a. Integrated Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste Feed Qualificication Program Description, 24590-WTP-PD-RAEN-EN-0008, Rev. 0. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2017b. Operations Requirements Document, 24590-WTP-RPT-OP-01-001, Rev 8. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2017c. Design Parameters & Test Pressures for Equipment & Piping, 24590-WTP-3DG-M40T-00001, Rev 1. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2017d. DFLAW Feed Vector For WTP APPS Model, CCN 295271, dated 23 February 2017. Bechtel National Inc., Richland, WA.

BNI. 2017e. LAW Concentrate Receipt Vessels LCP-VSL-00001/00002 Sizing, 24590-LAW-M6C-LCP-00001, Rev 2. Bechtel National, Inc., Richland, WA

BNI. 2017f. Interface Control Form (ICF) 24590-WTP-ICF-MGT-17-0002 Strategy Meeting, CCN 300509, dated 23 February 2017. Bechtel National Inc., Richland, WA.

CH2. 2002. Hanford 200 Area Intra Tank Farm and Cross-Site Transfer Line Encasement Piping Design Pressure Analysis LBB Technical Evaluation, RPP-12094, Rev 0. CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, WA.

DOE. 2013. Acceptance of Contract Deliverable 2.11, Proposed Deminimus Organic Concentration in Received Tank Waste, CCN 265033, dated 17 December 2013. US Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, Richland, WA.

DOE. 2015. Transmittal of the Revised Design Inputs for the Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste Initiative, CCN 277593, dated 17 March 2015. US Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, Richland, WA.

Ecology. 2017. Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion, Revision 8C, for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal of Dangerous Waste, Part III, Operating Unit Group 10 (Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant), WA7890008967, dated 05 October 2017. Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA.

Health. 2006. Radioactive Air Emissions Notice of Construction Approval for Construction of (WTP) Pretreatment Plant, CCN 138511, dated 4 April 2006. Washington Department of Health, Olympia, WA.

WAC 173-303. Dangerous Waste Regulations. Washington Administrative Code. Olympia, WA.

WRPS. 2011a. Double Shell Tank Diluent and Flush Subsystem Specification, HNF-4163, Rev 6. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page 31


WRPS. 2013. Double Shell Tank Transfer Piping Subsystem Specification, HNF-4161, Rev 6. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2015. Double Shell Tank Transfer Pump Subsystem Specification, HNF-4162, Rev 6. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2016a. Process Line Sizing Calculation. 31269-21-CALC-0032, Rev. 0. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2016c. Project T5L01 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Specification, RPP-SPEC-56967, Rev 6. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2016d. Integrated DFLAW Feed Qualification Data Quality Objectives, RPP-RPT-59494, Rev 0. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2017a. Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, Project No. 31269 (T5L01), Double Containment Piping for Waste Transfer Specification, Document No. 31269-16-2-010, Rev 0. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2017b. Integrated DFLAW Feed Qualification Program, RPP-RPT-59314, Rev 0. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2017c. Waste Transfer, Dilution, and Flushing Requirements, TFC-ENG-STD-26, Rev C-4. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2017d. Tank Farms Operations Administrative Controls, HNF-IP-1266, Section 5.8.8, Waste Transfer System Freeze Protection, Rev 2g. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2017e. Integrated Waste Feed Delivery Plan, Volumes 1, 2, & 3, RPP-40149-VOL1,VOL2, & VOL3, Rev. 4. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2017f. One System Charter, RPP-51471, Rev. 6 (24590-WTP-CH-MGT-11-008). Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

WRPS. 2017g. Tank Farms Technical Safety Requirements, HNF-SD-WM-TSR-006, Rev 8-B. Washington River Protection Solutions, Richland, WA.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page A-1


Appendix A - Open ICD 30 Issues and Actions

Issue / Action

# Tracking # Issue / Action Description

Contract or Baseline (In-Out-N/A) Affected

Page(s) WTP TOC1 MSC/

PRC

None

Notes: 1 TOC Baseline referenced here is the lifecycle Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB) which includes both WRPS- and DOE-owned scope. The approved

ICDs are among the baseline documents that comprise the technical scope for the TOC Life-Cycle PMB.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page B-1


Appendix B - Issues and Actions Closed Since Last Revision

Issue / Action

# Tracking # Issue / Action Date Closed Resolution

I30-01 WTP: 24590-WTP-ATS-MGT-15-0431

Table 1 and Sections 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 2.6, and 2.7 of this ICD contain scope that is beyond the design phase for DFLAW. For implementation of these sections, complete a WTP Contract modification to include DFLAW procurement, construction, startup, and commissioning scope that is currently outside the current specification in the WTP Contract.

03/31/2017

Closure of this issue was implemented by BNI contract modification #384. ORP approval to support closure of ATS item 24590-WTP-ATS-MGT-15-0431 is evidenced by CCN 293870, issued 12/21/2016. Formal ORP concurrence to close this specific ICD issue as detailed herein was received on 03/09/2017 (CCN 269152).

I30-02

WTP: 24590-WTP-ATS-MGT-15-0432 TOC Schedule Activity: WFQ-0625

Analysis of DFLAW feed samples from the qualification DST is not identified as either the TOC or the WTP Contractor scope.

05/22/2017

One System Decision Document 0007 (CCN 282252) recommends the use of the Hanford Site 222-S Laboratory as the DFLAW feed qualification laboratory. 24590-WTP-PD-RAEN-EN-0008, Integrated DFLAW Feed Qualification Program Description, describes the feed samples and the laboratory analysis and testing required to support DFLAW feed acceptance. Since this document provides a defined methodology for handling samples from a qualification tank, I30-02 has been closed.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page C-1


Appendix C - ICD 30 Open Items List NOTE: New open items are added to each ICD revision with a tracking number or schedule activity that would serve to track their completion

outside the ICD. Open items are removed from the ICD in the next revision following their introduction.

Item # Description Originator Responsible

Organization Actionee(s)

Tracking #

01

As stated in RPP-RPT-59314, Rev 0 (24590-WTP-PD-RAEN-008, Rev 0), Integrated DFLAW Feed Qualification Program Description: Feed cannot be transferred from a LAWPS lag storage tank to a WTP Concentrate Receipt Vessel (CRV) during process operations until each lag storage “Batch” has been analyzed. This is a HOLD point and WTP and WRPS must agree the contents meet Treated LAW Feed Acceptance Criteria for pH, Total Organic Carbon, Cesium-137, Transuranics (TRU) and Suspended Solids, as stated in Table 5. Currently a level of uncertainty exists that the timeframe needed to perform all tasks required to release the HOLD, may impede LAWPS operations. WTP and LAWPS staff will coordinate to ensure that the appropriate level of rigor is performed to provide objective evidence that Treated LAW Feed meets WTP waste acceptance criteria and aligns with LAWPS lag storage tank operations.

Goytowski, L. WTP / WRPS Benson, P / Arm, S 24590-WTP-ATS-MGT-17-0196 (WTP)

X317-12001-60 (WRPS)

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page C-2


Item # Description Originator Responsible

Organization Actionee(s)

Tracking #

02

Alignment of WTP and WRPS criticality requirements. The implementation of criticality safety controls will be further developed to provide clarity in requirements between the two facilities.

The further development of criticality controls will be accomplished via discussion at the WTP/TOC/ORP criticality interface meetings, rather than via the ICD-30 comment resolution process. The results which may require a future revision of 24590-WTP-CSER-NS-16-0001, Rev 0, Criticality Safety Evaluation Report for Direct Feed to the Low-Activity Waste Facility (BNI 2016f) would flow into this ICD as applicable.

Buczek, J WTP Wendt, K / Allen, T 24590-WTP-ATS-MGT-17-0204.

03

As listed in Table 1 of Section 2, the design conditions for each contractor’s section of the transfer pipeline are different. WTP and TOC will continue to work together toward resolving the differences as needed for operability, with consideration for potential directed changes.

Reinemann, D WTP TOC

Reinemann, D Arm, S

24590-WTP-ATS-MGT-17-300 (WTP)

WRPS tracking to be identified on ICD Action Item List

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page D-1


Appendix D- Draft Transfer Procedure Concepts The content in this appendix is conceptual in nature and intended as information only. The transfer procedure to be utilized during operations will be developed outside of this ICD at some future date. The following Figure 3 is supported by the information in Table 10.

Figure 3 DFLAW Feed Transfer Process Flow

TOC ActionWTP Action

Legend

No Yes

Yes

No Yes

Yes

Flush Complete

LAW Feed Requested & Acknowledged

1,2

Internal Prerequisites & Entry Conditions Met

3,4

Transfer Terminated, Resolution Initiated

14,15

Flush In Progress

16

Flush Terminated, Resolution Initiated

18,19

Parameters Maintained

16

TOC Notified to Initiate Transfer9

Flush Alignment Established,Flush Initiated

16,17

10

WTP ReadinessAcknowledged & Transfer

Initiated

Parameters Maintained

11,12,13

Transfer In Progress

11,12,13

6,7

Readiness CheckComplete

Permissives Set,System Aligned 5,8

20,21,22,23,24,25,26

Standby Alignment Established,Material Balance Confirmed

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page D-2


Table 10 DFLAW Feed Transfer Process Steps

Responsibility Action Why Needed

1 WTP Contractor

WTP Contractor requests transfer of compliant treated LAW feed.

WTP Contractor communicates need to receive next batch of treated LAW feed including:

Campaign number

Scheduled transfer start time

Transfer volume

Intended transfer path

2 TOC Acknowledge request for transfer of qualified LAW feed.

TOC concurs with transfer details above.

3 WTP Contractor

WTP Contractor internal pre-requisites and entry conditions met.

WTP Contractor internal system and administrative requirements met, including:

Tank space available

No transfer line leak detection alarms

LAW feed qualification acceptance

4 TOC TOC internal prerequisites and entry conditions met.

TOC internal system and administrative requirements met including:

Pre-transfer mixing complete

Flush water staged (LAW feed)

5 WTP Contractor

WTP Contractor aligns to receive transfer.

Align system to receive feed and clear transfer and to clear permissives and interlocks.

6 TOC TOC aligns for transfer to WTP. Align system to transfer LAW feed to WTP.

7 TOC Verify applicable leak detectors in transfer path are not in alarm.

Ensure no inadvertent environmental discharges.

8 WTP Contractor

Set transfer permissive. Completes logic to enable TOC transfer pump, including:

No leak detection alarms on transfer line

System lineup to a receipt vessel

LAW Facility operator hand switch set

9 WTP Contractor

Notify TOC of readiness for transfer commencement as planned.

Ensures TOC transfer can commence.

10 TOC Notify and initiate LAW feed transfer.

Transfer LAW feed.

11 WTP Contractor

Monitor vessel levels and other process indicators.

Monitor during transfer to identify upset conditions.

12 TOC Monitor vessel levels and other process indicators.

Monitor during transfer to identify upset conditions.

13 WTP Contractor

Align transfer path to additional receipt vessel if needed.

Delivery of feed to both CRVs in one transfer reduces volume of flush water.

14 WTP Contractor

Terminate transfer by initiating interlocks if necessary due to upset or exceeding target volume.

WTP Contractor may terminate the transfer if needed due to process upset or if transfer exceeds target volume.

15 TOC Terminate LAW feed transfer upon reaching target volume.

Terminate once agreed volume of LAW feed is transferred.

16 TOC Initiate post-transfer flush. Flush line to clear residual feed.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page D-3


Table 10 DFLAW Feed Transfer Process Steps

Responsibility Action Why Needed

17 WTP Contractor

Align flush through required flow paths.

Flush water through transfer path.

18 WTP Contractor

Terminate flush through implementation of an interlock.

WTP Contractor may terminate the flush if needed due to process upset or if flush exceeds target volume. Pumps stopped and valves fail to closed state.

19 TOC Terminate flush. Minimize water sent to WTP.

20 WTP Contractor

Change transfer readiness status as applicable.

Remove transfer permissive from the signal path to prevent inadvertent transfers.

21 TOC Align valves to facilitate draining of transfer line by WTP Contractor.

Prevent inadvertent transfer and siphon.

22 WTP Contractor

Align valves to drain transfer line. Eliminate standing water in transfer line as corrosion mitigation.

23 WTP Contractor

Secure lineup for LAW feed receipt. Align for next operational activity.

24 TOC Secure lineup for LAW feed transfer. Align for next operational activity.

25 WTP Contractor

Transmit amount of material received as indicated by WTP instrumentation.

Volumetric balance for transfer: amount of feed and flush/recycle received.

26 TOC Transmit amount of material received as indicated by TOC instrumentation.

Volumetric balance for transfer: amount of feed and flush delivered.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page E-1


Appendix E- Definitions

This appendix was developed as a reference to standardize the definition of terms used for direct LAW feed between the TOC, the WTP Contractor, and ORP. Of particular importance is the WTP Contractor’s definition of the terms which are used to determine the acceptance criteria values in Table 6.

General Definitions

Batch

A discrete volume of qualified treated LAW feed transferred from a single LAWPS lag storage tank to a LAW Facility CRV as a volume fraction of a campaign.

Campaign

All of the batches of treated LAW feed delivered to the LAW Facility from a single qualified DST.

Concentrate Receipt Vessel (CRV)

The CRVs are part of the LAW concentrate receipt process system (LCP). The two vessels are designed to receive concentrated LAW feed from the Pretreatment Facility and then transfer the feed to the LAW melter feed process system (LFP). In DFLAW operation, these vessels will receive treated LAW feed from the LAWPS and will function as feed receipt vessels.

DFLAW Feed

Tank waste upstream of the LAWPS that has been selected for processing in the LAWPS.

Flush Water

Demineralized water is being used by LAWPS to push a volume of treated LAW waste to WTP.

Interlocks

Interlocks are defined condition states or combinations of condition states that drive a specified software object to a predefined state. A close interlock (PriorityCmd0) forces a valve into the closed condition, for example.

Permissives

Defined condition states or combinations of condition states that prevents a specified software object and/or associated field device from transitioning from the current state to a different named state. For example for a valve, the no permissive close condition prevents the valve from transitioning to the closed state, but does not drive the valve to the opened state if the valve is closed.

Separable Organics

Separable organics are organic compounds (carbon based molecules) that are present in concentrations beyond their saturation point. The saturation point for a sample is determined by holding it at 25 °C for 8 hours. If the organic species separates as a solid or liquid under these conditions, the organic is deemed “separable.”

Suspended Solids

Suspended solids in treated LAW feed is a measurement of the dry weight of solids not dissolved in the carrier solution and is defined as the product of centrifuging the feed, separating and drying the solids, and removing the dissolved solids contribution. Results are expressed in weight percent solids in the treated LAW feed.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page E-2


Transient Flow

Flow where the flow velocity and pressure are changing with time. When changes occur to a fluid systems such as the starting or stopping of a pump, closing or opening a valve, or changes in tank levels, then transient flow conditions exist: otherwise the system is steady state

Treated LAW Feed

The stream produced by the LAWPS to be delivered to WTP.

Treated LAW Feed Acceptance Criteria

Quantified limitations on treated LAW feed parameters established to protect the WTP design or safety basis and meet environmental permit requirements.

Treated LAW Feed Transfer Physical Limits

Those physical limitations imposed upon the transfer of treated LAW feed to ensure the physical integrity of the transfer system and process stability.

WTP Contractor

The WTP Contract (BNI 2000) defines two WTP Contractors. The first is the WTP Contractor (referred to as the “Contractor” in the WTP Contract) who is responsible for designing, constructing, commissioning, and supporting the transition of the WTP to the WTP Operating Contractor (referred to as the “Operations Contractor” in the WTP Contract) to be selected by DOE. The term “WTP Contractor” used within this ICD applies to the “Contractor” as defined in the WTP Contract (BNI 2000).

WTP Operations Contractor

The WTP Contract (BNI 2000) defines two WTP Contractors. The first is the WTP Contractor (referred to as the “Contractor” in the WTP Contract) who is responsible for designing, constructing, commissioning, and supporting the transition of the WTP to the WTP Operating Contractor (referred to as the “Operations Contractor” in the WTP Contract) to be selected by DOE. The term “WTP Operations Contractor” used within this ICD applies to the “Operations Contractor” as defined in the WTP Contract (BNI 2000).

Treated LAW Feed Acceptance Criteria (Table 6) Definitions

Feed Receipt Temperature

Monitored in the TOC LAWPS lag storage tank or transfer line during the entirety of the feed transfer.

Hydrogen Generation Rate

Determined using the entire slurry and at the temperature listed. Result is determined from the measured hydrogen generation rate (g-mol H2/L/hr) and the volume tested (L). The hydrogen generation rate (g-mol H2/L/hr) is to be determined by sample and analysis.

Feed Bulk Density

Density of the entire stream, including any solids present. Results are to be determined after holding the sample at 25 °C for 8 hours.

Feed Viscosity

Viscosity of the entire stream, including any solids present. Results are to be determined after holding the sample at 25 °C for 8 hours.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page E-3


Solids Concentration

See general definition section for definition of suspended solids. Results are expressed in weight percent solids (mass of dry solids / mass of slurry) and are to be determined after holding the sample at 25 °C for 8 hours.

24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page F-1


Appendix F- Shared Process Control and Monitoring Data The conceptual information in Table 11 is the culmination of discussions between WRPS and WTP Control and Instrumentation design engineering staff. Although, it is a reasonable expectation that the data stated below is an acceptable representation of the shared process control and monitoring data required for the safe transport of Treated LAW Feed, it is provided as preliminary only.

Table 11 Shared Process Control and Monitoring Data

Signal Condition Source Destination Type I/O Type Component ID

Ready to Transfer Treated LAW N/A LAWPS WTP Permissive Binary N/A LAWPS Isolation Valve Position Ready to transfer (set by LAWPS transfer sequence) LAWPS WTP Status Binary XV-644

Ready to Transfer Treated LAW LAWPS WTP Status Binary N/A

Ready to Receive treated LAW WTP ready to Receive Treated LAW followed by flush WTP LAWPS Permissive Binary N/A

Low Point Drain Tank Isolation Valve

WTP LAWPS Status Binary YV-8682

Tank 1 Isolation Valve Status WTP LAWPS Status Binary YV-0108

Tank 1 Volume Available to Accept a Transfer

WTP LAWPS Status Continuous LI-0131

Tank 2 Isolation Valve Status WTP LAWPS Status Binary YV-0230

Tank 2 Volume Available to Accept a Transfer

WTP LAWPS Status Continuous LI-0233

DFLAW Ready to Transfer LAWPS Feed to WTP LAW

WTP LAWPS Permissive Binary N/A

Low Point Drain Tank Available Volume to Accept Flush

WTP LAWPS Permissive Continuous LI-8109

DFLAW to LAW Isolation Valve WTP LAWPS Status Binary YV-8683

LAWPS to DFLAW Isolation Valve WTP LAWPS Status Binary YV-8679

Waste Transfer in Progress Treated LAW transfer in progress (not flush) or XV-644 open and any of LAG-P-301A/B, LAG-P-302A/B, LAG-P-303A/B running

LAWPS WTP Status Binary N/A

LAG-P-301A/B Running LAWPS WTP Status Binary LAG-P-301A/B



24590-WTP-ICD-MG-01-030, Rev 1


Page F-2


Signal Condition Source Destination Type I/O Type Component ID

LAWPS Isolation Valve Position LAWPS WTP Status Binary XV-644

Flush in Progress Flush in progress (set by LAWPS flush sequence) or XV-644 open and RS-P-501A/B running


Transfer Completed Successfully Treated LAW and flush completed successfully; Signal stays on until next LAWPS transfer sequence initiated.

LAWPS WTP Status Binary XV-644 XV-665

Terminate Transfer Immediate stop of transfer pump or flush pump. LAWPS will immediately stop, and prevent transfer pump and flush pump from starting if LAWPS transfer valve (XV-644) is open.

WTP LAW

LAWPS Interlock Binary N/A

DFLAW to WTP LAW Leak Detection

WTP LAWPS Interlock Binary N/A

LAWPS to WTP LAW Radiation Hi Hi

WTP LAWPS Interlock Binary N/A

Tank 1 Level Hi Hi WTP LAWPS Interlock Binary LI-0130

Tank 2 Level Hi Hi WTP LAWPS Interlock Binary LI-0233

Transfer Completed Successfully LAW LAWPS Interlock Binary N/A

WTP LAW Emergency Shutdown WTP LAW

LAWPS Interlock Binary N/A

Transfer Terminated Prematurely - Rad Transfer Complete

LAWPS Treated LAW transfer or flush sequence aborted; Signal stays on until next LAWPS transfer sequence is initiated.


Transfer Flowrate N/A LAWPS WTP Measured Value

Continuous FIT-639

WTP Measure Feed Flow gph LAWPS WTP Measured Value

Continuous FT-8677

Transfer Volume N/A LAWPS WTP Setpoint Continuous N/A

Destination Tank Level N/A WTP LAW

LAWPS Measured Value

Continuous LI-0131 LI-0233

LAWPS to DFLAW Leak Detection Leak Detected LAWPS WTP LAW Status Binary N/A

Heartbeat - WTP generate signal which is on for 10 seconds then off for 10 seconds

On 10 seconds, off 10 seconds signifies Healthy WTP LAW

LAWPS Com Status Binary N/A