icao global safety analysis safety initiatives

International Civil Aviation Organization

Global Safety Analysis ICAO’s Safety Initiatives

Air Navigation Bureau

T/O - Henry Defalque

ICAO Safety Framework ICAO and the UN Community Safety data Policy & Standardization

– GASP Update – Safety Annex

Safety Analysis – Evolving to a risk-based process

Safety Monitoring – Continuous Monitoring Approach

Implementation – Runway Safety

A More Strategic Approach

3rd Global Aviation Safety Conference, Acapulco – 19-20 Sept 2011

Presenter

Presentation Notes

I will start this presentation with you by a description of ICAO’s relations with the other UN organizations, followed by some safety data, before proceeding to developments in global safety, which is all part of a strategic approach to safety.

Involved in crisis mgt & redevelopment for many years In most cases, outside the UN framework for: strikes &

disasters response, contingency routing schemes and assistance to States

Now working hard on integrating into the larger UN community for crisis management and redevelopment:

Accepted as member of the WFP Logistics cluster

Japan tsunami: Joint Radiation Emergency Mgt Plan sub-group

South-Sudan support (ANS)

Libya crisis: involved in upcoming UN assessment mission

ICAO working with the UN Community


E.g.:

Presenter

Presentation Notes

ICAO has been involved in crisis management and redevelopment after events for many years, and has always had a good working relationship with the WFP. In the past, ICAO has worked mostly outside the UN framework, responding to strikes and disasters, developing contingency routing schemes and providing direct assistance to States when requested. We are now working hard on integrating into the larger UN Community for crisis management and redevelopment after disasters so as to optimize use of its resources and services. Several recent examples illustrate this: The WFP has accepted that ICAO be a member of the Logistics cluster After the tsunami in Japan, ICAO established a transportation sub-group of the Joint Radiation Emergency Management Plan, which has since been made a permanent sub-group We were integral in ensuring that adequate air navigation services were available to support South Sudan during its inauguration ceremonies We have been actively involved with the crisis in Libya and will be part of a larger UN assessment mission that will take place in the near future. This outline of our working relationship with the UN Community is a little apart from the gist of this presentation on global safety, which now follows.

4

Fatalities (2001-2010)

806

645

524

670

767

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Num

ber o

f Fat

aliti

es

Fatalities per Year Scheduled Commercial Transport greater than 2 250kg only

Source: iSTARS

Annual fatalities Five-year moving average

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Reduce the number of fatalities – increase

15 15 16 13 20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Num

ber o

f Acc

iden

ts

112 122

138

113

131

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Num

ber o

f Acc

iden

ts

Accidents and Fatal Accidents per Year Scheduled Commercial Transport greater than 2250kg only

5

Accidents (2001-2010)

Fatal Accidents

All Accidents

For the last 10 years, on the average, 1 out of 7 accidents is

fatal

Source: iSTARS

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Reduce the number of accidents – showed increase based on a 5 year moving average Reduce the number of fatal Accidents – remained constant on a 5 year moving average

3.8

8.0

4.0

7.9

3.1

8.1

24.9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

APAC ESAF EUR/NAT MID NACC SAM WACAF 2001-2005 2006-2010 ICAO Adaptive Moving Average

2.3 3.1 2.6

5.7 3.5

5.5

21.7

3.8

8.0

4.0

7.9

3.1

8.1

24.9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

APAC ESAF EUR/NAT MID NACC SAM WACAF 2001-2005 2006-2010 ICAO Adaptive Moving Average

Per million departures

6

Regional Accident Rates (2001-2010)

Source: iSTARS

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Comparing 5yr Regional Accident Rates – All regions have increased except for NACC

7

Accidents in Detail: Identifying the main killers

*All accidents with a specified occurrence only

*

Accidents and related fatalities by Occurrence categories Scheduled Commercial Transport

2005- 2010

Mass Group greater than 2 250 kg

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Most of the accidents and fatal accidents were runway safety related. Controlled flight into terrain and loss of control in flight accidents are rare, but 8 out of 10 were fatal and caused almost half of total fatalities. Note: 20% of the fatalities are due to unknown causes

A high-level policy document guiding efforts of the States, industry and international organizations

Update scheduled for 2011 that will introduce safety management principles to create a strategic approach to implementation of global safety initiatives (GSI)

Accomplished in parallel and in harmony with the update of the Global Aviation Safety Roadmap (GASR)

Current Global Aviation Safety Plan


Presenter

Presentation Notes

Let us start with the GASP, A high-level policy document guiding efforts of the States, industry and international organizations, first published in 2007. ….

Objective – Strategic coordination of global

safety activities – Guide the prioritization and

allocation of aviation safety resources

– Measureable achievement of global safety targets

GASP

Overview of Updated GASP


Goal – Reduce the risk of loss of human life

through continuously enhancing aviation safety

Safety Targets – Safety targets will be defined

according to risk criteria – Continually measured for significant

change

Global Safety Initiatives – Linked to global safety targets – Specific metrics will monitor GSI

effectiveness

Goal

Safety Targets

Global Safety Initiatives

Strategic Approach


Proposed Safety Targets

General Target – Reduce the number of fatalities AND the global fatal accident

rate resulting from aviation accidents worldwide irrespective of the volume of traffic

Supporting Safety Targets (risk-based) – Significantly reduce the rate of high-risk accidents and serious

incidents including: • Runway related events • Loss of control in-flight • Controlled flight into terrain


Global Safety Initiatives (GSI)

Developed to enhance safety globally, by addressing safety issues specific to States

GSI focus will follow a progressive implementation model – building safety management practices on sound fundamental safety oversight systems

GSI metrics will monitor progress, providing timely information regarding the global state of safety

Information sharing is essential to the implementation and measurement of many GSIs


Proposed Global Safety Initiatives GSI 1 - Implementation of International Standards and Recommended Practices GSI 2 - Establishment and Management of a Regulatory Oversight System GSI 3 - Maintaining Sufficient Number of Qualified Personnel GSI 4 - Establishment and Management of Accident and Incident Investigation Capabilities GSI 5 - Establishment and Management of a Safety Reporting System GSI 6 - Alignment and Coordination of Regional Programmes GSI 7 - Implementation of State Safety Programme (SSP) GSI 8 - Use of Technology to Enhance Safety GSI 9 - Continuous Monitoring and Improvement of State’s Aviation Safety System


Presenter

Presentation Notes

The 9 proposed GSIs are prioritized according to the development and capabilities of the State’ s Civil Aviation system. The first 3 are crucial to improve the safety of an underdeveloped system: ….

Current Safety SARPs for SSP / SMS

Safety Management SARPs for Service Providers

Date Denomination Annex

Nov 2001 Safety Management Programme 11,14

Jan 2009 SMS 6, 11,14

Nov 2010 SMS 1

Nov 2010 SMS Framework (Appendix) 1, 6, 11,14

Nov 2013 SMS 8

Safety Management SARPs for States

Date Denomination Annex

Nov 2006 Safety Programme 6, 11,14

Nov 2010 SSP 1, 8,13

Nov 2010 SSP Framework (Attachment) 1, 6, 8,11,13,14


Presenter

Presentation Notes

All safety Standards and Recommended Practices related to SMS and SSP are now applicable except those related to aircraft type design and manufacture organizations in Annex 8, which are due in 2013.

ICAO High-level Safety Conference 2010

RECOMMENDATION 2/5 ICAO should develop, in close collaboration with States,

international and national organizations, a new Annex dedicated to safety management responsibilities and processes which would address the safety management responsibilities of States framed under the State Safety Programme (SSP)

The new Safety Management Annex should facilitate the provision of State and air carrier safety information to the travelling public, in addition to specifying the high level safety responsibilities of States


Presenter

Presentation Notes

However ICAO is working to implement the recommendation of the 2010 HLSC.

Related Council Decision

Safety Management

19

Two phased development process: – Initial phase focused on the

reorganization of existing SARPs and supporting guidance material.

– Concurrently, an in-depth review of SARPs will be initiated to assess whether they need to be amended or expanded.


Presenter

Presentation Notes

Following a Council Decision, the new Annex will be developed using a 2-phase process: An initial phase focused on the reorganization of existing provisions into the new Annex to be completed using a fast-track procedure; a longer-term in-depth review of the safety management SARPs, conducted by a new ICAO Panel of experts.

Safety Management Manual

– Update planned for 2011

– Detailed guidance to be developed for SMS / SSP implementation

Safety Management Guidance Material


Presenter

Presentation Notes

To support the implementation of SMS and SSP, the SMM is being updated with a target date of end of 2011.

ICAO is “Walking the Talk”

Safety Analysis – Integrated Safety Trend Analysis & Reporting System (iSTARS) – Analytical support for ICAO safety programmes and worldwide

audits – Leverages the benefits of data provided by multiple

stakeholders


Presenter

Presentation Notes

At the same time, ICAO has been developing a safety analysis tool called iSTARS to collect, analyze data from multiple shareholders and produce meaningful data reports to support our safety programmes and audits..

iSTARS

www.icao.int (under Safety menu)


http://www.icao.int/�

The Benefits of Information Sharing

• Aggregation – The combination of multiple like data sources – Enhances data quality & increases sample sizes to identify

emerging safety issues – Enables comparative benchmarking analyses to determine

best practices



• Integration – The combination of multiple disparate types of data – Provides comprehensive perspective to identify systemic

hazards – Essential to mitigate complex safety issues



• Efficiency – Information sharing can reduce or

eliminate duplication of effort – Proven synergies related to safety

audit practices – Operational savings realized through

proactive use of shared information


An Important Distinction

• Data or information? – Data consists of facts

• May be sensitive or create liability

– Information is the result of data analysis • May be more easily exchanged with external entities

– Common taxonomies and interoperable data management systems are essential


But, there are costs…

• Issue: – Information sharing requires investment of time & resources

• Expected outcome: – ICAO is working with Member States & industry partners to

facilitate exchange of safety information


…as well as risks

• Issue: – Shared information has potential to create liability, or

compromise organizational interests

• Expected outcome: – ICAO multidisciplinary Task Force will enhance protective

standards & recommended practices


The Global Safety Information Exchange (GSIE)

• Sharing aviation safety information among key players in the civil aviation community: – Initial partners are ICAO, IATA, the FAA and the EU. – A steering group involving all participants has been

established. – First meetings have looked at information to be shared and

how to harmonize shared data (ex: accident rates) and at safety outreach activities.


ICAO Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Online Framework

• The applications within the online framework will facilitate the administration and management of: • State Aviation Activity Questionnaires ( SAAQs) • Compliance Checklists (CCs) • Protocol Questions (PQs) • Mandatory Information Requests (MIRs) • Finding and Recommendations (F&Rs) • Significant Safety Concerns (SSCs) and • Corrective Action Plans (CAPs)

• This enhances the effectiveness and efficiency of the USOAP CMA in identifying deficiencies and associated safety risks.


Presenter

Presentation Notes

As you know, the ICAO cycles of Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme is evolving towards a CMA that will apply risk management techniques to the monitoring of States’ safety oversight capabilities. It will be based on the CMA online framework. The applications within the online framework will facilitate the administration and management of the various pieces of information collected from or provided to States, as listed here, and of other ICAO data sources. Such online applications enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the USOAP CMA in identifying deficiencies and associated safety risks.

Data Management Systems

Online Safety Framework


Global Safety Awareness

File/Research Differences to ICAO SARPs

USOAP Web Site eFOD

Customers Resources

iSTARS

ICAONET

Regional/State Safety Awareness

Carry out Safety Oversight Responsibilities

Air Operator Certificate System (AOC)

Inspectors Aircraft Registry System (ARS)

Look up Safety information on Aircraft

CAA and Council

Air Navigation Plan AN Deficiencies

Keep aircraft and air operators data up to date

Products

RASG

Processes

Presenter

Presentation Notes

From the data from resources, through automated processes, products are provided to the appropriate customer.

Data Management Systems

Online Safety Framework


Global Safety Awareness

File/Research Differences to ICAO SARPs

USOAP Web Site eFOD

Customers Resources

iSTARS

ICAONET

Regional/State Safety Awareness

Carry out Safety Oversight Responsibilities

Air Operator Certificate System (AOC)

Inspectors Aircraft Registry System (ARS)

Look up Safety information on Aircraft

CAA and Council

Air Navigation Plan AN Deficiencies

Keep aircraft and air operators data up to date

Products

RASG

Processes

CMA Online Framework

Safety Monitoring The Transition to CMA


Two-year transition to the CMA (2011-2012)

CMA implementation will begin January 2013

Presenter

Presentation Notes

ICAO plans for a two-year transition to the CMA (2011-2012) with implementation commencing in January 2013.

Implementation Creating Comprehensive Solutions

420 Participants convened to address our top safety issues related to runway safety

A multidisciplinary approach, involving airlines, airport operators, ANSPs and other stakeholders


Presenter

Presentation Notes

ICAO also invests in the roll-out and implementation of new SARPS or in the addressing of identified safety issues, through the conduct of HQ symposiums, regional seminars, etc. An example is the Global Runway Safety Symposium held in May 2011.

GRSS Outcomes


One size does not fit all Solutions need to account for local conditions yet be

standardized and harmonized to ensure interoperability Runway incursions and excursions are the main issues

but other aspects such as Bird Strike, FOD should not be overlooked

Collaborating at multiple levels International organizations have committed to work

together to compile and promote proven solutions and endorse best practices

Runway Safety Teams – should be established locally and hosted by the airports

GRSS Outcomes


Improve Standardization / Harmonization Develop guidance to define and launch Runway Safety

Teams Harmonize “Runway Safety” definitions, taxonomies

and reporting of runway conditions and other safety indicators

Standardize and improve communication procedures ICAO to ensure that Standards and Guidance material

are fit for purpose Implementation of ICAO Standards monitored through

the Continuous Monitoring Approach

GRSS Outcomes


All partners have committed to increasing the exchange of runway safety information

ICAO Dedicated Runway Safety page Library of downloadable toolkits

and documents Contributions from partner

organizations Links to Skybrary and other

runway safety partner sites http://www2.icao.int/en/ism/iStars

Regional Runway Safety Seminars


All Runway Safety Programme Partners have committed to deliver Regional Runway Safety Seminars

RRSS events will result in action plans to create runway safety teams and provide support to those already in place

Proposed RRSS schedule


Proposed Date Location State Co-host International Organisation Co-host

2011: 24 - 25 Oct Miami FAA IFATCA 2011: 06 – 08 Dec Delhi CAA, India IATA / FSF 2012: 08 Mar Amsterdam Eurocontrol ATC Global / CANSO

2012: Apr/May Middle East CANSO

2012: Jul South America CANSO

2012: Aug Philippines AAPA / IATA

*2012: Oct/Nov Cape Town CANSO

2013: Mar Western Africa ACI

2013: Jun Europe Eurocontrol IATA

2013: Aug Asia Pacific AAPA / IATA

2013: Sep Europe Eurocontrol IATA

2013: Nov Asia Pacific FSF

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Here is the proposed schedule of seminars until end 2013. Since then, the FRM symposium has been held and will lead to the same regional outreach.

Thank you

T/O Henry Defalque [email protected]


icao global safety analysis safety initiatives

Documents