iaod evaluation seminar : “demystifying evaluation in wipo –
DESCRIPTION
Demystifying Evaluation in WIPO: MY EXPECTATIONS OF EVALUATION IN WIPO Kjell Larsson WIPO IAOC. IAOD Evaluation Seminar : “Demystifying Evaluation in WIPO – Best Practices from Initial Evaluations”. Geneva November, 8 2012. Evaluation Experience. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
IAOD Evaluation Seminar: “Demystifying Evaluation in WIPO – Best Practices from Initial Evaluations” Geneva
November, 8 2012
Demystifying Evaluation in WIPO: MY EXPECTATIONS OF EVALUATION IN WIPO
Kjell LarssonWIPO IAOC
Evaluation Experience
Participated in/responsible for evaluations commissioned by SE National Audit Office, Government, Parliament, Counties and OECDMain sectors: Education and Research, Industrial and Regional Development, Energy, Water management, Forestry, Environment, IT development and Maintenance, Governance and Effectiveness of Public Organisations partly/fully State ownedTeacher in Evaluation (Uppsala University)Institutional Capacity Building in Central and Eastern Europe (OECD/SIGMA, European Commission)Evaluation of Anti-Fraud and Corruption Programs and Institutions (European Commission/OLAF)
Expectations (1)
Evaluation types include self-evaluations, as well as process, efficiency, effectiveness, results and effect/impact evaluations of key aspects of WIPO products and servicesAll evaluation types are carried out in parallel with the setting up of a “WIPO-system” for evaluation What is evaluated clearly reflects stakeholders needs. Subjects and evaluation types are carefully chosen on the basis of needs, timing and resources
Expectations (2)
WIPO finds a wise balance (and peaceful co-existence) between “accountability” and a “learning approach”All evaluations meet defined quality standards All ToRs and evaluations are subject to a defined and transparent quality assurance processThere are NO “PR-evaluations”How/who takes care of evaluation results (and recommendations) is defined and clarified beforehand
Expectations (3)
The establishment of institutional memory to gather and share relevant knowledge on WIPO evaluations is clarified and its mechanisms are definedWIPO evaluators have good and open relationships with academia and other organisations involved in evaluationDraft ToRs and reports are widely shared within WIPOFinal evaluation reports are published as a rule
Expectations (4)
WIPO evaluations become a candidate for the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2020!
