iaea risk informed applications. · example ~ risk-informed technical s ifi ti li a d t r t s pec...
TRANSCRIPT
Ri
kI
fd
Ali
tiIn
tern
atio
nal A
tom
ic E
nerg
y A
genc
y
Ris
k–In
form
ed A
pplic
atio
ns1)
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
Spe
cifi
cati
on2)
Just
ific
atio
nfo
rC
onti
nued
Ope
rati
on2)
Jus
tifi
cati
on f
or C
onti
nued
Ope
rati
on3)
Spe
cial
Tre
atm
ent
Req
uire
men
ts
IAE
AW
orks
hop
IAE
A W
orks
hop
Saf
ety
Goa
ls a
nd IR
IDM
Pro
cess
Nov
embe
r 11-
15, 2
013
See
Men
g W
ong,
PhD
U.S
. Nuc
lear
Reg
ulat
ory
Com
mis
sion
SM
W@
See
-Men
g.W
ong@
nrc.
gov
Pre
sent
atio
nO
utlin
eP
rese
ntat
ion
Out
line
R
isk
Info
rmed
Tech
nica
lSpe
cific
atio
n(R
ITS
)
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
Spe
cific
atio
n (R
I-TS
)
Exa
mpl
e of
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
Spe
cific
atio
n C
hang
eC
hang
e
Ju
stifi
catio
n fo
r Con
tinue
d O
pera
tion
(JC
O) ~
N
otic
eof
Enf
orce
men
tDis
cret
ion
(NO
ED
)N
otic
e of
Enf
orce
men
t Dis
cret
ion
(NO
ED
) P
roce
ss
S
ilT
ttR
it
10C
FR
Spe
cial
Tre
atm
ent R
equi
rem
ents
~ 1
0 C
FR
50.6
9
2
Ris
kIn
form
edA
pplic
atio
nI
Ris
k-In
form
ed A
pplic
atio
n I
Ris
k-In
form
edT
hi
lSifi
tiTe
chni
cal S
peci
ficat
ion
(RIT
S)
(RI-T
S)
3
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
Spe
cific
atio
n (R
ITS
)(R
I-TS
)
Oft
ht
fl
ik
if
d
One
of t
he m
ost s
ucce
ssfu
l ris
k-in
form
ed
appl
icat
ions
in th
e U
S
A
ll lic
ense
es h
ave
impl
emen
ted
som
e as
pect
of R
I-TS
p
4
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
Spe
cific
atio
n (R
ITS
)(R
I-TS
)
Gen
eral
Phi
loso
phy:
App
lyris
kin
sigh
tsfro
mP
SA
toG
ener
al P
hilo
soph
y: A
pply
risk
insi
ghts
from
PS
A to
es
tabl
ish
and
man
age
plan
t ope
ratio
nal l
imits
and
re
quire
men
ts
R
egul
ator
y G
uide
1.1
77 u
sed
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith
Reg
ulat
ory
Gui
de 1
.174
for N
RC
pos
ition
on
RI-T
S
prog
ram
sp
g
Jo
int I
ndus
try/N
RC
initi
ativ
es to
est
ablis
h m
etho
ds to
ap
ply
PS
A to
Tec
hnic
al S
peci
ficat
ions
B
enef
its:
Im
prov
ed s
afet
y fo
cus
on ri
sk-s
igni
fican
t ite
ms/
issu
es
Flex
ibili
ty/re
laxa
tion
ofre
quire
men
tsw
hen
appr
opria
te
Flex
ibili
ty/re
laxa
tion
of re
quire
men
ts w
hen
appr
opria
te
5
RIT
SIn
itiat
ives
RI-T
S In
itiat
ives
In
itiat
ive
1:M
odifi
edE
ndS
tate
s–
just
ifyre
mai
ning
ina
mod
eot
her
Initi
ativ
e 1:
Mod
ified
End
Sta
tes
just
ify re
mai
ning
in a
mod
e ot
her
than
col
d sh
utdo
wn
whe
n eq
uipm
ent i
s in
oper
able
In
itiat
ive
2: M
isse
d S
urve
illan
ce T
est –
just
ify a
dditi
onal
tim
e to
co
mpl
ete
am
isse
dte
stco
mpl
ete
a m
isse
d te
st
In
itiat
ive
3: M
odify
exi
stin
g m
ode
rest
rain
t log
ic to
allo
w e
ntry
into
hi
gher
mod
e lim
iting
con
ditio
ns fo
r ope
ratio
n (L
CO
s)
In
itiat
ive
4a:
TS C
ompl
etio
n Ti
me
(CT)
Ext
ensi
ons
–ju
stify
ex
tens
ions
of s
elec
ted
syst
em C
Ts
In
itiat
ive
4b:
Ris
k M
anag
ed T
S –
allo
w fl
exib
le C
Ts b
ased
on
gco
nfig
urat
ion-
spec
ific
risk
calc
ulat
ions
and
risk
man
agem
ent a
ctio
ns
usin
g N
RC
app
rove
d m
etho
dolo
gy
6
RI-T
S In
itiat
ives
(Con
tinue
d)
In
itiat
ive
5:E
xten
sion
ofS
urve
illan
ceTe
stIn
terv
als
-sta
ffap
prov
edIn
itiat
ive
5: E
xten
sion
of S
urve
illan
ce T
est I
nter
vals
st
aff a
ppro
ved
risk-
info
rmed
met
hodo
logy
to a
llow
lice
nsee
con
trol o
f tes
t int
erva
ls
In
itiat
ive
6: M
odifi
catio
n of
LC
O 3
.0.3
(shu
tdow
n) –
chan
ges
to
requ
ired
actio
nsan
dtim
esre
quire
d ac
tions
and
tim
es
In
itiat
ive
7a:
Snu
bber
s-d
elay
LC
Os
entry
due
to re
mov
al o
f sn
ubbe
rsfo
r tes
ting/
mai
nten
ance
In
itiat
ive
7b:
Haz
ard
Bar
riers
-de
lay
LCO
ent
ry d
ue to
rem
oval
of
haza
rd b
arrie
rs to
sup
port
mai
nten
ance
In
itiat
ive
8: R
emov
al o
f non
risk
-sig
nific
ant L
CO
s fro
m T
S s
cope
gp
7
Ris
kIn
form
edTe
chni
calS
peci
ficat
ions
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
Spe
cific
atio
ns
E
ach
initi
ativ
eca
nin
volv
eso
me
com
bina
tion
of:
E
ach
initi
ativ
e ca
n in
volv
e so
me
com
bina
tion
of:
To
pica
l Rep
ort a
ppro
ving
the
gene
ric c
hang
e
Sta
ndar
d Te
chni
cal S
peci
ficat
ion
chan
ge p
ropo
sal
with
a T
echn
ical
Spe
cific
atio
n Ta
sk F
orce
des
igna
tor
P
ilot p
lant
sub
mitt
al to
test
the
chan
gep
g
A C
onso
lidat
ed L
ine
Item
Impr
ovem
ent P
roce
ss
(CLI
IP) p
acka
ge•
Des
crib
edin
NR
CR
egul
ator
yIs
sue
Sum
mar
y20
00-0
6,D
escr
ibed
in N
RC
Reg
ulat
ory
Issu
e S
umm
ary
2000
06,
“Con
solid
ated
Lin
e Ite
m Im
prov
emen
t Pro
cess
for A
dopt
ing
Sta
ndar
d Te
chni
cal S
peci
ficat
ions
Cha
nges
for P
ower
R
eact
ors,
” for
revi
ewin
g an
d im
plem
entin
g im
prov
emen
ts to
th
eS
tand
ard
Tech
nica
lSpe
cific
atio
nsth
e S
tand
ard
Tech
nica
l Spe
cific
atio
ns
8
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
Spe
cific
atio
ns~
Cha
lleng
es
Est
ablis
hing
the
appr
opria
tele
elof
PS
A
Est
ablis
hing
the
appr
opria
te le
vel o
f PS
A
qual
ity to
sup
port
each
app
licat
ion
S
cope
ofP
SA
mod
els
need
edfo
rspe
cific
S
cope
of P
SA
mod
els
need
ed fo
r spe
cific
ch
ange
s
eg
lack
ofde
taile
dfir
em
odel
sm
aym
ake
som
e
e.g.
, lac
k of
det
aile
d fir
e m
odel
s m
ay m
ake
som
e ap
plic
atio
ns n
ot p
ossi
ble
A
ddre
ssin
g m
odel
ass
umpt
ions
and
g
pun
certa
intie
s
9
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
S
ifiti
LiA
dtR
tS
peci
ficat
ion
Lice
nse
Am
endm
ent R
eque
st
R
eque
st:
Ext
end
the
curre
nt T
echn
ical
Spe
cific
atio
n q
p(T
S) e
mer
genc
y di
esel
gen
erat
or (E
DG
) Com
plet
ion
Tim
e (C
T) fr
om 3
day
s to
14
days
A
llow
sex
tend
edm
aint
enan
ceat
pow
erin
stea
dof
durin
g
Allo
ws
exte
nded
mai
nten
ance
at-p
ower
inst
ead
of d
urin
g re
fuel
ing
outa
ge
S
ince
sub
mitt
al is
a ri
sk-in
form
ed li
cens
e am
endm
ent,
th
lif
dth
e lic
ense
e re
fere
nced
:
RG
1.1
74, “
An
App
roac
h fo
r Usi
ng P
RA
in R
isk-
Info
rmed
D
ecis
ions
on
Pla
nt-S
peci
fic C
hang
es to
the
Lice
nsin
g B
asis
”
R
G 1
.177
, “A
n A
ppro
ach
for P
lant
-Spe
cific
, Ris
k-In
form
ed
Dec
isio
n m
akin
g: T
echn
ical
Spe
cific
atio
ns”
10
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
p
Spe
cific
atio
n Li
cens
e A
men
dmen
t Req
uest
P
roce
ss fo
r rev
iew
of r
isk-
info
rmed
lice
nse
amen
dmen
t re
ques
ts:
PSA
Trad
ition
alA
naly
sis
1.D
efin
e 2.
Per
form
3.
Def
ine
4.S
ubm
it
Ana
lysi
s
Cha
nge
Eng
inee
ring
Ana
lysi
sIm
plem
enta
tion/
Mon
itorin
g P
rogr
am
Pro
pose
d C
hang
e
U
ses
the
5 ke
y pr
inci
ples
R
isk
acce
ptan
ce g
uide
lines
11* R
G 1
.174
, “A
n A
ppro
ach
for U
sing
Pro
babi
listic
Ris
k A
sses
smen
t in
Ris
k-In
form
ed D
ecis
ions
on
Pla
nt-S
peci
fic C
hang
es to
the
Lice
nsin
g B
asis
”
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
p
Spe
cific
atio
n Li
cens
e A
men
dmen
t Req
uest
2.C
hang
e is
con
sist
ent w
ith
defe
nse-
in-d
epth
phi
loso
phy.
5 K
ey
Prin
ciple
s
INTE
GR
ATE
DD
EC
ISIO
NM
AK
ING
1.C
hang
e m
eets
cur
rent
re
gula
tions
unl
ess
it is
ex
plic
itly
rela
ted
to a
n
3.M
aint
ain
suffi
cien
t sa
fety
mar
gins
.
DE
CIS
ION
MA
KIN
Gp
yex
empt
ion
or ru
le c
hang
e.
5U
sepe
rform
ance
4P
ropo
sed
incr
ease
sto
CD
F5.
Use
per
form
ance
-m
easu
rem
ent s
trate
gies
to
mon
itor t
he c
hang
e.
4.P
ropo
sed
incr
ease
s to
CD
F or
risk
are
sm
all a
nd a
re
cons
iste
nt w
ith th
e C
omm
issi
on’s
Saf
ety
Goa
l P
olic
y S
tate
men
t.
12
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
S
ifiti
LiA
dtR
tS
peci
ficat
ion
Lice
nse
Am
endm
ent R
eque
st
R
equi
red
info
rmat
ion
inlic
ense
esu
bmitt
al
Req
uire
d in
form
atio
n in
lice
nsee
sub
mitt
al1)
List
of a
pplic
able
regu
latio
ns a
nd h
ow a
re th
e re
gula
tions
bei
ng
met
2)Im
pact
ofth
ech
ange
onde
fens
ein
dept
h2)
Impa
ct o
f the
cha
nge
on d
efen
se in
dep
th3)
Impa
ct o
f the
cha
nge
on s
afet
y m
argi
ns4)
Ris
k as
sess
men
t)P
fi
5)P
erfo
rman
ce m
easu
rem
ent s
trate
gies
D
eter
min
istic
anal
ysts
revi
ewite
ms
#1,
2,3,
&5
Det
erm
inis
tic a
naly
sts
revi
ew it
ems
# 1,
2, 3
, & 5
P
SA
ana
lyst
s re
view
item
s #
4 &
5
13
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
S
ifiti
LiA
dtR
tS
peci
ficat
ion
Lice
nse
Am
endm
ent R
eque
st
P
art 1
: App
licab
le R
egul
atio
nspp
g
Lice
nsee
con
firm
ed th
at th
e ch
ange
mee
ts
the
a ppl
icab
le re
gula
tions
:pp
g•
Gen
eral
Des
ign
Crit
erio
n 17
, Ele
ctric
Pow
er S
yste
ms
–O
nsite
and
offs
ite e
lect
ric p
ower
sys
tem
s w
ill s
till p
rovi
de
capa
city
and
capa
bilit
yto
assu
refu
elan
dR
CS
desi
gnlim
itsar
eca
paci
ty a
nd c
apab
ility
to a
ssur
e fu
el a
nd R
CS
des
ign
limits
are
no
t exc
eede
d an
d vi
tal f
unct
ions
are
mai
ntai
ned
•G
ener
al D
esig
n C
riter
ion
18, I
nspe
ctio
n an
d Te
stin
g of
E
lect
ricP
ower
Sys
tem
sw
illst
illbe
met
Ele
ctric
Pow
er S
yste
ms
will
stil
l be
met
•10
CFR
50.
63 –
Sta
tion
Bla
ckou
t cop
ing
anal
ysis
not
im
pact
ed
10C
FR0
6W
illi
fM
iR
l•
10 C
FR 5
0.65
–W
ill s
atis
fy c
urre
nt M
aint
enan
ce R
ule
relia
bilit
y an
d av
aila
bilit
y go
als
14
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
p
Spe
cific
atio
n Li
cens
e A
men
dmen
t Req
uest
P
art2
:D
efen
sein
Dep
th
Par
t 2:
Def
ense
in D
epth
Li
cens
ee s
tate
d th
at th
ere
is n
o ac
tual
impa
ct
onde
fens
ein
dept
has
are
sult
ofth
ech
ange
:on
def
ense
in d
epth
as
a re
sult
of th
e ch
ange
:•
Fiss
ion
prod
uct b
arrie
rs n
ot im
pact
ed•
Equ
ipm
entr
edun
danc
yno
tim
pact
ed•
Equ
ipm
ent r
edun
danc
y no
t im
pact
ed•
Cur
rent
lice
nse
allo
ws
a pe
riod
of ti
me
whe
n th
e pl
ant d
oes
not m
eet t
he s
ingl
e fa
ilure
crit
erio
np
g–
Req
uest
ed c
hang
e in
volv
es o
nly
the
exte
nsio
n of
the
time
perio
d
15
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
S
ifiti
LiA
dtR
tS
peci
ficat
ion
Lice
nse
Am
endm
ent R
eque
st
P
art 3
: Saf
ety
Mar
gins
yg
R
G 1
.177
sta
tes
that
suf
ficie
nt s
afet
y m
argi
ns a
re
mai
ntai
ned
whe
n:A
libl
id
td
dt
dd
t•
App
licab
le in
dust
ry c
odes
and
sta
ndar
ds a
re m
et•
Saf
ety
anal
ysis
acc
epta
nce
crite
ria in
the
UFS
AR
are
met
Th
elic
ense
est
ates
that
exte
ndin
gth
eE
DG
Th
e lic
ense
e st
ates
that
ext
endi
ng th
e E
DG
C
ompl
etio
n Ti
me
(or A
llow
ed O
utag
e Ti
me)
:•
Doe
s no
t mod
ify o
r affe
ct c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith a
ny in
dust
ry
stan
dard
s•
Doe
s no
t red
uce
requ
irem
ents
for r
edun
dant
equ
ipm
ent t
o be
op
erab
le d
urin
g th
e ex
tend
ed C
ompl
etio
n Ti
me
•S
uffic
ient
redu
ndan
cyw
illbe
mai
ntai
ned
toen
sure
the
Suf
ficie
nt re
dund
ancy
will
be
mai
ntai
ned
to e
nsur
e th
e ac
cide
nt a
naly
ses
in th
e U
pdat
ed F
SA
R re
mai
n va
lid16
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
p
Spe
cific
atio
n Li
cens
e A
men
dmen
t Req
uest
P
art4
:Ris
kA
sses
smen
t
Par
t 4: R
isk
Ass
essm
ent
R
G 1
.177
3-ti
er a
ppro
ach:
•A
sses
sris
kbo
thav
erag
ean
dco
nfig
urat
ion
spec
ific
•A
sses
s ris
k, b
oth
aver
age
and
conf
igur
atio
n-sp
ecifi
c•
Pre
clud
e po
tent
ially
hig
h-ris
k pl
ant c
onfig
urat
ions
•H
ave
adeq
uate
prog
ram
s/pr
oced
ures
inpl
ace
toH
ave
adeq
uate
pro
gram
s/pr
oced
ures
in p
lace
to–
iden
tify
risk-
sign
ifica
nt p
lant
con
figur
atio
ns re
sulti
ng fr
om
mai
nten
ance
or o
ther
ope
ratio
nal a
ctiv
ities
–ta
keap
prop
riate
com
pens
ator
ym
easu
res
toav
oid
such
take
app
ropr
iate
com
pens
ator
y m
easu
res
to a
void
suc
h co
nfig
urat
ions
17
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
S
peci
ficat
ion
Lice
nse
Am
endm
entR
eque
stS
peci
ficat
ion
Lice
nse
Am
endm
ent R
eque
st
P
art4
Tier
1A
sses
sR
isk
P
art 4
, Tie
r 1 –
Ass
ess
Ris
k
Tech
nica
l ade
quac
y of
the
PS
A u
sed
for t
his
requ
est
requ
est
•M
odel
sco
pe•
Indu
stry
pee
r rev
iew
•C
onfo
rman
ceto
RG
120
0•
Con
form
ance
to R
G 1
.200
E
valu
atio
n of
the
PS
A re
sults
and
risk
insi
ghts
f
thi
tfo
r thi
s re
ques
t•
Com
pare
impa
ct o
n ris
k to
acc
epta
nce
guid
elin
es
of R
G 1
.174
and
RG
1.1
77 s
ince
this
is a
TS
ch
ange
18
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
p
Spe
cific
atio
n Li
cens
e A
men
dmen
t Req
uest
Req
uest
ed C
hang
e
19
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
p
Spe
cific
atio
n Li
cens
e A
men
dmen
t Req
uest
•Par
t4Ti
er2
Hig
hR
isk
Con
figur
atio
ns•P
art 4
, Tie
r 2 –
Hig
h R
isk
Con
figur
atio
ns
Lice
nsee
iden
tifie
d, u
p-fro
nt, p
oten
tially
hig
h-ris
k pl
ant
fiti
tiiti
hth
dC
Ti
conf
igur
atio
ns o
r act
iviti
es w
hen
the
prop
osed
CT
is
ente
red
Li
cens
eeim
pose
dap
prop
riate
rest
rictio
nson
thes
e
Lice
nsee
impo
sed
appr
opria
te re
stric
tions
on
thes
e co
nfig
urat
ions
or a
ctiv
ities
ass
ocia
ted
with
the
CT
exte
nsio
n ar
e in
pla
ce
20
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
S
ifiti
LiA
dtR
tS
peci
ficat
ion
Lice
nse
Am
endm
ent R
eque
st
P
art4
Tier
3R
isk
Man
agem
entP
rogr
am
Par
t 4, T
ier 3
–R
isk
Man
agem
ent P
rogr
am
The
licen
see
stat
ed th
at it
s M
aint
enan
ce R
ule
(a)(4
) pr
ogra
m s
atis
fies
the
inte
nt o
f Tie
r 3 b
ecau
se th
e lic
ense
e:•
Ass
esse
s an
d m
anag
es ri
sk o
f equ
ipm
ent r
emov
ed fr
om
serv
ice
prio
r to
or d
urin
g th
e pr
opos
ed e
xten
ded
AO
T pe
riod
•Id
entif
ies
risk-
sign
ifica
nt p
lant
con
figur
atio
ns re
sulti
ng fr
om
mai
nten
ance
or o
ther
ope
ratio
nal a
ctiv
ities
•Ta
kes
appr
opria
te c
ompe
nsat
ory
mea
sure
s
Rev
iew
ers
mus
t det
erm
ine
whe
ther
the
(a)(4
) pr
ogra
m m
eets
the
inte
nt o
f RG
1.1
77 T
ier 3
21
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
S
ifiti
LiA
dtR
tS
peci
ficat
ion
Lice
nse
Am
endm
ent R
eque
st
•Par
t5:P
erfo
rman
ceM
easu
rem
ent
•Par
t 5: P
erfo
rman
ce M
easu
rem
ent
Th
e lic
ense
e sh
ould
ens
ure
that
whe
n eq
uipm
ent
does
not
mee
t its
per
form
ance
crit
eria
, the
eva
luat
ion
p,
requ
ired
unde
r the
Mai
nten
ance
Rul
e (M
R) i
nclu
des
prio
r rel
ated
TS
cha
nges
in it
s sc
ope
Li
cens
ee s
tate
d th
at:
•Th
e E
DG
s ar
e m
onito
red
unde
r the
MR
pro
gram
in
acco
rdan
cew
ith10
CFR
5065
acco
rdan
ce w
ith 1
0 C
FR 5
0.65
•E
DG
s ar
e cu
rren
tly d
esig
nate
d “c
ateg
ory
(a)(
2) –
mee
ting
esta
blis
hed
relia
bilit
y an
d un
avai
labi
lity
goal
s”
22
Exa
mpl
e ~
Ris
k-In
form
ed T
echn
ical
S
ifiti
LiA
dtR
tS
peci
ficat
ion
Lice
nse
Am
endm
ent R
eque
st
O
utco
me
O
utco
me
Li
cens
e am
endm
ent i
ssue
d
S
afet
y E
valu
atio
n ex
cerp
t:•
“The
NR
Cst
afff
inds
that
the
licen
see'
spr
opos
edTh
e N
RC
sta
ff fin
ds th
at th
e lic
ense
es
prop
osed
ch
ange
to re
vise
the
TS to
per
mit
exte
ndin
g th
e C
T fro
m 3
day
s to
14
days
for a
n in
oper
able
ED
G is
ac
cept
able
beca
use
the
five
key
prin
cipl
esof
risk-
acce
ptab
le b
ecau
se th
e fiv
e ke
y pr
inci
ples
of r
isk
info
rmed
dec
isio
n m
akin
g id
entif
ied
in R
G 1
.174
an
d R
G 1
.177
hav
e be
en s
atis
fied.
”
23
Ris
k-In
form
edA
pplic
atio
nII
Ris
kIn
form
ed A
pplic
atio
n II
Just
ifica
tion
for C
ontin
ued
Oi
(JC
O)
Ope
ratio
n (J
CO
)
~ N
otic
e of
Enf
orce
men
t D
iscr
etio
n(N
OE
D)P
roce
ssD
iscr
etio
n (N
OE
D) P
roce
ss
24
Just
ifica
tion
for C
ontin
ued
Ope
ratio
n (J
CO
)~
Not
ice
of E
nfor
cem
ent D
iscr
etio
n (N
OE
D) P
roce
ss
Li
cens
eeR
eque
sts
Reg
ulat
ory
Act
ion
Whe
n:
Lice
nsee
Req
uest
s R
egul
ator
y A
ctio
n W
hen:
C
ircum
stan
ces
whe
re c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith a
Tec
hnic
al
Spe
cific
atio
n(T
S)
orot
herr
equi
rem
ent
wou
ldre
sult
Spe
cific
atio
n (T
S),
or o
ther
requ
irem
ent,
wou
ld re
sult
in in
appr
opria
te p
lant
con
ditio
ns th
at c
ould
affe
ct th
e he
alth
and
saf
ety
of th
e pu
blic
Th
e N
RC
sta
ff de
term
ines
whe
ther
to a
llow
the
licen
see
to v
iola
te th
e TS
with
out i
ssui
ng a
vi
olat
ion
for v
iola
ting
the
TS v
ia o
ne o
f tw
o w
ays:
Em
ergen
cy a
men
dm
ent
N
otic
e of
Enf
orce
men
t Dis
cret
ion
(NO
ED)
25
Not
ice
of E
nfor
cem
ent D
iscr
etio
n (N
OE
D)
()
~ W
hat i
s it?
N
RC
is e
xerc
isin
g its
dis
cret
ion
to N
OT
enfo
rce
gco
mpl
ianc
e w
ith th
e op
erat
ing
licen
se fo
r a s
peci
fied
time
perio
d
Topr
omot
esa
fety
byno
tim
posi
ngun
nece
ssar
ytra
nsie
nts
or
To p
rom
ote
safe
ty b
y no
t im
posi
ng u
nnec
essa
ry tr
ansi
ents
or
shut
dow
ns o
f an
oper
atin
g re
acto
r or u
nnec
essa
ry d
elay
s in
pl
ant s
tartu
ps w
ithou
t a c
orre
spon
ding
hea
th a
nd s
afet
y be
nefit
N
OE
Ds
are
not a
ppro
pria
te fo
r non
-con
form
ance
s w
ith
regu
latio
ns, U
pdat
ed F
inal
Saf
ety
Ana
lysi
s R
epor
ts
(UFS
AR
s)or
code
s(U
FSA
Rs)
, or c
odes
.
N
OE
D is
for t
empo
rary
and
non
recu
rring
requ
est -
it sh
ould
not
be
used
on
a re
gula
r bas
is a
s a
subs
titut
e fo
r g
com
plia
nce
26
Not
ice
of E
nfor
cem
ent D
iscr
etio
n (N
OE
D)
Wh
ttfN
OE
D?
~ W
hat t
ypes
of N
OE
Ds?
R
egul
arN
OE
D
Reg
ular
NO
ED
S
ituat
ions
invo
lvin
g ra
diol
ogic
al s
afet
y
App
licab
le fo
r pla
nts
at p
ower
, in
shut
dow
n, o
r atte
mpt
ing
to s
tart
up
N
atur
al E
vent
NO
ED
S
ever
ew
eath
er
Sev
ere
wea
ther
E
lect
rical
grid
inst
abili
ty
Pan
dem
ic c
ondi
tions
O
ther
nat
ural
phe
nom
ena
P
ublic
em
erge
ncie
s un
rela
ted
to n
atur
al e
vent
s
27
Not
ice
of E
nfor
cem
ent D
iscr
etio
n (N
OE
D)
()
~ Im
plem
enta
tion
Pro
cess
N
RC
Insp
ectio
n M
anua
l Cha
pter
041
0, “N
otic
es o
f p
p,
Enf
orce
men
t Dis
cret
ion,
” Mar
ch 2
013.
N
OE
D P
roce
ss
Com
mun
icat
ion
betw
een
licen
see
and
NR
C s
taff
•In
form
al d
iscu
ssio
ns fo
r inf
orm
atio
n ga
ther
ing
and
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
th
e si
tuat
ion
Fld
ii
th
th
ilb
ttt
hl
t•
Form
al d
iscu
ssio
n to
hea
r tec
hnic
al b
ases
to s
uppo
rt th
e re
gula
tory
de
cisi
on m
akin
g
Pro
cess
Con
side
ratio
ns•
Use
dw
hen
less
than
72ho
urs
until
the
TSre
quire
men
tsre
quire
sa
•U
sed
whe
n le
ss th
an 7
2 ho
urs
until
the
TS re
quire
men
ts re
quire
s a
shut
dow
n
•Li
cens
ee m
ay N
OT
wai
t unt
il th
e la
st m
inut
e so
that
they
can
avo
id a
lic
ense
am
endm
ent
•N
OT
allo
wed
forp
lann
eden
tries
into
TSR
equi
red
Act
ions
tope
rform
•N
OT
allo
wed
for p
lann
ed e
ntrie
s in
to T
S R
equi
red
Act
ions
to p
erfo
rm
mai
nten
ance
, tro
uble
shoo
ting,
or o
ther
act
iviti
es28
Not
ice
of E
nfor
cem
ent D
iscr
etio
n (N
OE
D)
()
~ R
isk-
Info
rmed
Bas
is fo
r App
rova
l
Dem
onst
rate
“no
net i
ncre
ase
in ri
sk,”
eith
er in
a
ii
id
fib
lli
iqu
antit
ativ
e as
sess
men
t , o
r in
a de
fens
ible
qua
litat
ive
man
ner
N
umer
ical
goa
ls o
f 5E
-7 a
nd 5
E-8
for I
CC
DP
and
ICLE
RP
(
G1
1)
resp
ectiv
ely
(per
RG
1.1
77),
usin
g ze
ro m
aint
enan
ce b
asel
ine
PS
A m
odel
D
omin
ant c
ontri
buto
rs w
ith s
umm
ary
of ri
sk in
sigh
ts
Com
pens
ator
y m
easu
res
cred
its (q
uant
itativ
e &
qua
litat
ive)
with
fo
cus
on:
•In
itiat
ing
even
ts li
kelih
ood
•U
nava
ilabi
lity
ofre
dund
antt
rain
s•
Una
vaila
bilit
y of
redu
ndan
t tra
ins
•H
uman
err
or
Ext
ent o
f con
ditio
n re
view
and
com
mon
cau
se fa
ctor
s ad
just
men
ts
Ext
erna
l eve
nt ri
sk c
ontri
butio
ns (e
.g.,
seve
re w
eath
er, g
rid
stab
ility
, etc
.)29
Ris
k-In
form
edA
pplic
atio
nIII
Ris
k-In
form
ed A
pplic
atio
n III
Spe
cial
Trea
tmen
tReq
irem
ents
Spe
cial
Tre
atm
ent R
equi
rem
ents
~10
CFR
5069
~ 10
CFR
50.
69
30
10 C
FR 5
0.69
~B
ackg
roun
d~
Bac
kgro
und
10
CFR
50.
69 is
a v
olun
tary
alte
rnat
ive
regu
latio
n:
To ri
sk-in
form
the
scop
e of
spe
cial
trea
tmen
t req
uire
men
ts
(“as
sura
nce
requ
irem
ents
”)
Not
cha
ngin
g de
sign
bas
is o
r tec
hnic
al fu
nctio
nal r
equi
rem
ents
E
nabl
eN
RC
and
licen
see
tobe
tterf
ocus
reso
urce
son
E
nabl
e N
RC
and
lice
nsee
to b
ette
r foc
us re
sour
ces
on
regu
lato
ry is
sues
of g
reat
er s
afet
y si
gnifi
canc
e, w
hile
con
tinui
ng
to p
rovi
de re
ason
able
ass
uran
ce o
f ade
quat
e pr
otec
tion
to p
ublic
he
alth
and
saf
ety
B
asic
str
uctu
re o
f sec
tion
50.6
9:
Bui
lt ar
ound
cat
egor
izat
ion
(par
agra
ph (c
)), w
hich
incl
udes
:In
tern
ale
ents
PS
Aat
fll
poer
that
has
been
peer
reie
ed•
Inte
rnal
eve
nts
PS
A a
t ful
l pow
er th
at h
as b
een
peer
revi
ewed
•E
xper
t pan
el (I
nteg
rate
d D
ecis
ion-
mak
ing
Pan
el)
A
pply
trea
tmen
t req
uire
men
ts (p
arag
raph
(d))
as
a fu
nctio
n of
R
ISC
bin
Im
plem
ente
d vi
a lic
ense
am
endm
ent w
ith N
RC
sta
ff re
view
s/ap
prov
es c
ateg
oriz
atio
n pr
oces
s31
10 C
FR 5
0.69
Sta
tus
~ S
tatu
s
10
CFR
5069
pbl
ishe
din
Fede
ralR
egis
ter
10
CFR
50.
69 p
ublis
hed
in F
eder
al R
egis
ter
on N
ovem
ber 2
2, 2
004
(69
FR 6
8008
)
Im
plem
enta
tion
Gui
danc
e:
NE
I00
04R
evis
ion
0da
ted
July
2005
N
EI 0
0-04
, Rev
isio
n 0
date
d Ju
ly 2
005
R
egul
ator
y G
uide
1.2
01, R
evis
ion
1, is
sued
for t
rial
use
in M
ay 2
006
y•
End
orse
s N
EI 0
0-04
, Rev
isio
n 0,
with
a n
umbe
r of
clar
ifica
tions
, as
an a
ccep
tabl
e ap
proa
ch fo
r cat
egor
izin
g S
SC
s fo
r 10
CFR
50.
69
32
Ris
kC
ateg
oriz
atio
nP
roce
ssR
isk
Cat
egor
izat
ion
Pro
cess
Safe
ty-R
elat
edN
onsa
fety
-Rel
ated
Safe
ty-R
elat
edN
onsa
fety
-Rel
ated
NEI
00-
04C
ateg
oriz
atio
n Pr
oces
sN
EI 0
0-04
Cat
egor
izat
ion
Proc
ess
Safe
tySi
gnifi
cant
RIS
C-1
RIS
C-2
Safe
tySi
gnifi
cant
RIS
C-1
RIS
C-2
g
RIS
C-3
RIS
C-4
Low
Saf
ety
Sign
ifica
nt
g
RIS
C-3
RIS
C-4
Low
Saf
ety
Sign
ifica
nt
33
RG
1.2
01G
lSt
ffP
itiG
ener
al S
taff
Pos
ition
s
Entir
e pr
oces
s de
scrib
ed in
NEI
00-
04 is
inte
gral
to
idi
blfid
id
b10
CFR
prov
idin
g re
ason
able
con
fiden
ce re
quire
d by
10
CFR
50
.69
S
ectio
ns 2
-7 &
10
desc
ribe
the
proc
ess
used
to d
eter
min
e th
e se
tofL
SS
SS
Cs
set o
f LS
S S
SC
s
Sec
tion
8 de
scrib
es th
e ris
k se
nsiti
vity
eva
luat
ion
used
to
conf
irm a
ccep
tabl
y sm
all r
isk
impa
ct fr
om re
mov
al o
f spe
cial
tre
atm
ent
S
ectio
n 9
desc
ribes
the
IDP
func
tion
of re
view
ing
and
ensu
ring
syst
em fu
nctio
ns a
nd o
pera
ting
expe
rienc
e ar
e co
nsid
ered
S
ectio
ns 1
1 &
12
desc
ribe
the
proc
esse
s fo
r mai
ntai
ning
the
valid
ityof
the
cate
goriz
atio
npr
oces
sva
lidity
of t
he c
ateg
oriz
atio
n pr
oces
s
D
egre
e of
relie
f gai
ned
unde
r 10
CFR
50.
69 d
epen
ds
onth
ety
pes
ofan
alys
esus
edin
the
cate
goriz
atio
non
the
type
s of
ana
lyse
s us
ed in
the
cate
goriz
atio
n pr
oces
s34
Ris
k C
ateg
oriz
atio
nC
idti
Con
side
ratio
ns
HSS
RIS
C-1
HSS
Ris
kC
hara
cter
izat
ion
•In
tern
al E
vent
R
isks
LSS
HSS
LSS
RIS
C1
And
RIS
C-2
Ris
k Se
nsiti
vity
HSS
Ris
ks•
Fire
Ris
ks•
Seis
mic
Ris
ks•
Oth
er E
xter
nal
Ris
ks•
Shut
dow
n R
isks
Inte
grat
edD
ecis
ion-
mak
ing
Inte
grat
edD
ecis
ion-
mak
ing
Def
ense
-in-D
epth
Cha
ract
eriz
atio
n
HSS
LSS
LSS
Stud
yLS
S
mak
ing
Pane
l (ID
P)R
evie
w
mak
ing
Pane
l (ID
P)R
evie
w
RIS
C-3
And
RIS
C-4
•O
pera
ting
Expe
rienc
e•
Engi
neer
ing
•D
BA/L
icen
sing
R
equi
rem
ents
•PR
A
35
RG
1.2
01G
lSt
ffP
itiG
ener
al S
taff
Pos
ition
s
Tech
nica
lade
quac
yne
eds
tobe
addr
esse
dfo
rful
lTe
chni
cal a
dequ
acy
need
s to
be
addr
esse
d fo
r ful
l sc
ope
of th
e an
alys
is (i
.e.,
all m
odes
& in
itiat
ors)
O
nly
inte
rnal
eve
nts
at fu
ll po
wer
mus
t use
a P
SA
O
nly
endo
rsed
PS
AS
tand
ard
isfo
rint
erna
leve
nts
atfu
llpo
wer
O
nly
endo
rsed
PS
A S
tand
ard
is fo
r int
erna
l eve
nts
at fu
ll po
wer
M
ust j
ustif
y m
etho
ds a
re te
chni
cally
ade
quat
e fo
r thi
s ap
plic
atio
n
Mh
ith
tld
li
ki
M
echa
nism
s th
at c
ould
cau
se la
rge
risk
incr
ease
s th
at c
ould
pot
entia
lly in
valid
ate
the
assu
mpt
ions
un
derly
ing
the
cate
goriz
atio
n pr
oces
s w
ould
hav
e to
in
volv
eth
eem
erge
nce
ofex
tens
ive
com
mon
caus
ein
volv
e th
e em
erge
nce
of e
xten
sive
com
mon
cau
se
failu
res
and
sign
ifica
nt u
nmiti
gate
d de
grad
atio
n
App
roac
h re
lies
on c
orre
ctiv
e ac
tion
and
feed
back
pro
cess
es
(des
crib
ed in
NE
I 00-
04 S
ectio
n 12
.4) f
or a
ddre
ssin
g th
ese
()
gis
sues
and
pre
clud
ing
reac
hing
una
ccep
tabl
e S
SC
per
form
ance
36
RG
1.2
01G
lSt
ffP
itiG
ener
al S
taff
Pos
ition
s
10sp
ecifi
ccl
arifi
catio
nsar
epr
esen
ted
10 s
peci
fic c
larif
icat
ions
are
pre
sent
ed
Cla
rific
atio
n of
term
inol
ogy
•“im
porta
nt to
saf
ety,
” “si
mul
tane
ous”
C
larif
ying
sta
ff un
ders
tand
ing
of s
peci
fic in
tent
of N
EI
00-0
4 di
scus
sion
•P
roce
ss “b
lend
s ris
k in
sigh
ts, n
ew te
chni
cal i
nfor
mat
ion,
and
g
,,
oper
atio
nal f
eedb
ack”
R
ecog
nizi
ng a
ltern
ativ
e ap
proa
ches
can
be
prop
osed
fo
rspe
cific
NE
I00-
04ar
eas
for s
peci
fic N
EI 0
004
are
as•
AS
ME
Cod
e C
ase
N-6
60
Iden
tifie
s ne
ed fo
r lic
ense
con
ditio
n to
add
ress
the
met
hods
relie
dup
onfo
rthe
cate
goriz
atio
npr
oces
sm
etho
ds re
lied
upon
for t
he c
ateg
oriz
atio
n pr
oces
s37
RG
1.2
01Im
plem
enta
tion
Sch
edul
eIm
plem
enta
tion
Sch
edul
e
Tr
iala
pplic
atio
nbe
ing
perf
orm
ed
Tria
l app
licat
ion
bein
g pe
rfor
med
Le
sson
sle
arne
dfr
ompi
lots
will
beus
edto
:
Less
ons
lear
ned
from
pilo
ts w
ill b
e us
ed to
:
Sup
port
deve
lopm
ent o
f tem
plat
e of
info
rmat
ion
and
leve
l of
deta
il ne
eded
to s
uppo
rt fu
ture
10
CFR
50.
69 s
ubm
ittal
s
Efi
lid
iffi
itt
lt
E
nsur
e fin
al g
uida
nce
is s
uffic
ient
to re
mov
e re
gula
tory
un
certa
intie
s an
d es
tabl
ish
regu
lato
ry s
tabi
lity
in th
e re
view
, ap
prov
al, a
nd im
plem
enta
tion
of 1
0 C
FR 5
0.69
cat
egor
izat
ion
proc
ess
proc
ess
E
nhan
ce N
EI 0
0-04
and
RG
1.2
01 re
gula
tory
gui
danc
e
38
Inte
rnat
iona
l Ato
mic
Ene
rgy
Age
ncy
The
End
Que
stio
ns&
Ans
wer
sQ
uest
ions
& A
nsw
ers…
..
39