iaccm - hot issues, burning topics & scorching opportunities
TRANSCRIPT
Hot Issues, Burning Topics and Scorching Opportunities
“A key trend in 2010 is a growing recognition that contracting is a source of innovation, both in what is offered to the market and what is sought from the supply base. This demands an increased role for market intelligence; contracts professionals (buy-side, sell-side and legal) will be expected to understand the significance and economic value of contract terms and structures.” (Trends in
Contract & Commercial Management, December 2009)
Financial Times, January 6th, 2010
Business open to losses from
risks taken on in slumpUrgent solutions expose companies to
fresh perils
� Weaker supply chains
� Rushed product development
� Lower supervision
� Rush into unfamiliar products and territories
� Increased contract liabilities
� Low-cost outsourcing
� Warning of consequences (policing)
� Managing consequences (reacting)
� Preventing consequences (proactive change)
� Build from the exciting developments in 2009
� Contracting – ‘a core competence’ (Willcocks)
� Contracting – ‘a source of value’(Vitasek/Cohen)
� Contracting – ‘ a cost determinant’(Williamson)
� Contracting – ‘an instrument for cooperation’
(Macneil)
Innovation Focus
Collaboration FocusLong-
term
Large
Low High
Cost
efficiency
Business
improvement
Innovation
for growth Co
pyrig
ht IA
CC
M 20
09
. All rig
hts reserved
.
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Imp
act
Short-
term
Small
Cost
cutting
Sustained
cost
reduction
From Willcocks & Craig,
‘Collaborating to Innovatë’
Cost efficiency
Contract
Administration
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4
Contract
Management
Relationship
Management
Collaborative
Innovation
Copyright IACCM 2009. All rights reserved.
Time /
Value
Behavior
Purchase order
Relationship agreementPartnership or alliance
Do it yourself or make an
acquisition
High
High
Low
Negotiated agreement
� New contract models for ‘complex’ projects and relationships
� Growing sophistication in termination and change management provisions
� Drive for industry standard contracts and contracting principles
� More adaptive approaches to contract pricing
� Making collaboration a reality
“One of the key trends must be that the top decision levels in a company are better aware of the great importance contract management has in modern business life. And that contract management truly is a cross-functional and interdisciplinary applied science”. (Rene Henschel, Professor of Law & Economics, Aarhus School of Business)
Financial Times, January 6th, 2011
Business shows dramatic
improvement in managing
risksCommercial innovation overcomes perils
of global markets
Based on research by……
Is there a better way to Contract for Outsourced Services?
“The significant problems we face
cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we
created them.”
14
15© Kate Vitasek 2009
The Game of Outsourcing
16© Kate Vitasek 2009
Contracting in Complex Deals is Really Just a Bet
17© Kate Vitasek 2009
Why Do We Act this Way?
“Morality is what people should do.
Economics is what people do.”
18© Kate Vitasek 2009
How SHOULD we ACT and CONTRACT
WIIFWE
19© Kate Vitasek 2009
Win –Win
is
Really
Beautiful!
20© Kate Vitasek 2009
Adam Smith said: “The best results comes from everyone in the group doing what is best for themselves.
That is incomplete.
The best result will come from everyone in the group doing what is good for himself and the group. It is the only way we all win.”
“Adam Smith was wrong….”
21© Kate Vitasek 2009
5 Rules of Vested Outsourcing
WIIFWE
22© Kate Vitasek 2009
1.
Outcome
Based vs.
Transaction
Based
Model
23© Kate Vitasek 2009
24© Kate Vitasek 2009
How Healthy is YOUR Outsourcing Agreement?
10 Ailments of Conventional Outsourcing Models
1 Penny Wise and Pound Foolish
2 The Outsourcing Paradox
3 The Activity Trap
4 The Junkyard Dog Factor
5 The Honeymoon Effect
6 Sandbagging
7 The Zero Sum Game
8 Driving Blind Disease
9 Measurement Minutia
10 The Power of Not Doing
Not following the Vested Outsourcing rules typically leads to the following Ailments
25© Kate Vitasek 2009
Vested Outsourcing Implementation Plan
26© Kate Vitasek 2009
When to do a VO
Vested approaches should be used when a supplier can help you find the Pony! Don’t go through the effort if there is not high potential and a win for everyone!
HIGHLOW
HIGH
LOW
Pote
ntial Valu
e t
o t
he O
rganiz
ation
Organizational Expertise
Conventional
Outsourcing
CoreActivity
for the
Company
Don’t Outsource
To be driven primarily by
Financial Consideration
The Rule
Outsource Here
Don’t Do
Vested
here!
Vested Outsourcing
Apply Vesting Thinking “When It Makes Sense”Vested Outsourcing Performance Partnerships are a new classification for managing complex outsourcing relationships.
Vested Outsourcing offers a “vested” outsourcing relationship where there is a positive tension backed by “skin in the game” to succeed
However, it’s NOT the more permanent solution found in a strategic alliance
Reward to the Organization
Ris
k /
Ma
rke
t D
iffi
cult
y
Routine
Strategic
Strategic
Alliances
Performance
Partnerships
Preferred
Suppliers
Transactional
Higher R is k
/
Higher R ew ard driv
es
s upplier in
no v atio n
27
© Kate Vitasek 2009
TRU ST
28© Kate Vitasek 2009
Is there a better way to Contract for Outsourced Services?
“The significant problems we face
cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we
created them.”
28
From Law to Economicsshifting measurements of success
March 23, 2010
© 2008 Huron Consulting Services Inc. All rights reserved.
Americas 2010 Conference
Discussion Topics
• Legal – Changing workload and role
• Prioritizing the contract portfolio
• How attorneys spend their time – Client Sample
• Defining escalation criteria
• Using business objectives to define measurements
Nancy JessenManaging Director, Legal [email protected]
202-585-6841
Increasing workload and changing roles
32
Cost Discipline and Growing Responsibilities Stretc h Law Departments Thin
Before 2000 2000-2002 2002-Current
Legal Demands
Legal Resources
How to manage the gap?
Reactive Services Proactive Service
Cost-Consciousness
Corporate Responsibility
Need to prioritize the contract portfolio
High
HighLow Impact onCompetitive Advantage
Pot
entia
l Ris
k
Task 1 : Prioritize contract types based on “Value” to the company, considering:
• Potential Risk: The extent to which specific types of contracts can create a negative impact for the company, e.g. financial, regulatory, reputation.
• Impact on Competitive Advantage: The degree to which the type of contracts drives competitive advantage and supports the corporate strategy.
Task 2: Determine legal’s involvement and the level rigor and scrutiny to be established in the approval process based on the value of the contract types the company.
Evaluating how attorney time is spent
34
Need to question if Effort is appropriately aligned with Value based upon the “Value” of the contract type
Value Effort Type of Contract/Work (FTE %)
Higher 27%
• Mergers and Acquisitions (9%)• General Advice and Counsel (6%)• Information Technology (6%)• Special Projects (3%)• Construction (1%)• Co-Manufacturing (1%)• Training to Business Partners (1%)
Medium 68%
• Advertising, Marketing and Promotion (23%)• Non-Disclosure/Confidentiality (13%)• Consulting (11%)• Sales and Distribution (11%)• Supply of Goods and Services (6%)• Real Estate (4%)
Lower 4% • Outside Counsel Management (4%)
CLIENT SAMPLE
>1/3of time
3535
How is attorney time being spent?
Attorneys Paralegals
Dollar ValueCur.
FTE %Cur. FTE
Opt. FTE Diff. FTE
Cur. FTE %
Cur. FTE
Opt. FTE Diff. FTE
< $100K 21% 0.22 0.03 -0.19 61% 0.41 0.43 0.02
$100K < $500K 23% 0.25 0.12 -0.13 32% 0.20 0.22 0.01
$500K - $1 Million 23% 0.25 0.31 0.06 11% 0.07 0.07 -
>$1 Million 32% 0.36 0.16 -0.21 0% - - -
Total 100% 1.09 0.62 -0.47 100% 0.68 0.72 0.04
* FTE based on 1,900 hours.* Total # of Ppl will not equal the sum of the number by type because each person responded to multiple types of work* 26 people entered a % of time for at least one of the Contracts subtypes on the Analysis tab
Almost 50% of Attorney time on low dollar value
contracts
CLIENT SAMPLE
3636
How is attorney time being spent?
Attorneys Paralegals
Type of ContractCur.
FTE %Cur. FTE
Opt. FTE Diff. FTE
Cur. FTE %
Cur. FTE
Opt. FTE Diff. FTE
Non-Routine 53% 0.58 0.50 -0.08 21% 0.14 0.14 0.01
Routine 47% 0.51 0.12 -0.39 79% 0.54 0.58 0.03
Total 100% 1.09 0.62 -0.47 100% 0.68 0.72 0.04
* FTE based on 1,900 hours.* Total # of Ppl will not equal the sum of the number by type because each person responded to multiple types of work* 26 people entered a % of time for at least one of the Contracts subtypes on the Analysis tab
Almost 50% of Attorney time on routine contracts
CLIENT SAMPLE
37
Use of defined escalation criteria to determine involvement of legal resources
SAMPLE CRITERIA FOR LEGAL INVOLVEMENT RESPONSE NEXT STEP
1. Value: Is the contract value greater than $X? No � #2 Yes � Involve Legal
2. Duration: Is the contract duration longer than X months? No � #3 Yes � Involve Legal
3. Customer/Vendor : Is this a new relationship? No � #4 Yes � Involve Legal
4. International: Is this a new geography? No � #5 Yes � Involve Legal
5. Legal Terms : Have high risk legal terms been revised? No � #6 Yes � Involve Legal
6. Potential Liability: Is it higher than normal? No � #7 Yes � Involve Legal
7. Overall Risk to Company: Is it outside normal parameters?
No � #8 Yes � Involve Legal
8. Other: TBD, (e.g., Type of Contract – Enterprise Outsourcing)
No Yes � Involve Legal
38
How is success defined?
Lawyers need to provide legal advice through a business lens …
• Focus on “higher value” work
• Strategic and proactive advice
• Business knowledge and acumen
• Risk identification and management
• Cost management and efficiency
• Consistency of policy and position
• Central hub for enterprise-wide coordination
39
Prioritized business objectives should drive development of operational measurements for the enterprise portfolio
Cost Savings/Revenue Improvement Efficiency Gains
• Streamline internal operations enabling a reduced internal cost
• Leverage centralized resources across all business units to reduce internal headcount
• Increase management of margin & revenue cycle time
• Increase understanding of revenue streams, leakage
• Reduce costs through leveraging full buying-power with suppliers
• Reduce cycle time for contract negotiation process
• Reduce cycle time for contract routing and approvals
• Reduce number of negotiation cycles
• Manage work load distribution and time allocation based upon type, complexity and value of contracts
• Enable business to identify areas offering the greatest potential for improving efficiency
• Maximize operational efficiencies through streamlined contract review process
Quality Improvement Risk Mitigation
• Identification of relevant contracts in centralized repository
• Structured contract approvals based upon defined criteria, e.g. margin, risk, volume and revenue targets
• Increase consistent use of standard business terms
• Full understanding of customer/vendor relationship to drive increased financial benefit
• Provides better management decision making by ensuring accurate data and audit trails of transactions
• Increase understanding and management of contractual obligations
• Required use of standard terms with alerts and notification for use of non-standard legal terms
• Agreed upon and approved revenue recognition approach prior to contract execution
• Greater compliance with approved authority levels for negotiations, amendments, and change orders
• Improved compliance with regulatory requirements
Thank You
Continued discussion …
Roundtable: “Lawyers Behaving Badly”
Rules and processes that improve the management of risk
Thursday, 9:05 am
Nancy JessenManaging Director, Legal [email protected]
202-585-6841
Contract Management &
Relationship Management
Where Do They Intersect?
IACCM Americas 2010
Relational Contracting Changes The Rules
Innovation Focus
Collaboration FocusLong-
term
Large
Low High
Cost
efficiency
Business
improvement
Innovation
for growth Co
pyrig
ht IA
CC
M 2
00
9. A
ll righ
ts rese
rve
d.
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Imp
act
Short-
term
Small
Cost
cutting
Sustained
cost
reduction
From Willcocks & Craig,
‘Collaborating to Innovatë’
Cost
efficiency
Relationship Management Goals
Copyright © 2010 IACCM. All rights reserved.
Preparing Ourselvesfor Leadership
Paul Mallory 23 March 2010
What matters most?
Copyright © 2010 IACCM. All rights reserved.
12
3IACCM survey January 2010
How do we demonstrate our value today?
Fires extinguished! Messes cleared up!
Bids submitted! Deals closed!
Litigation avoided! Risks identified!
Price of supplies reduced! We come when you call!
Problems exposed! The voice of sanity!
Copyright © 2010 IACCM. All rights reserved.
CCM-man
Does this approach enable recognition of our value?
� All MD’s/CEO’s are looking for economies
� Focusing on core competence, outsourcing non-core
� Is CCM core?
� Wrong question... Does MD/CEO view CCM as
core?
� The super hero approach may not be compelling for all MD/CEO’s
� And it relies on personalities
Copyright © 2010 IACCM. All rights reserved.
Leadership in CCM
� Lack of leadership places CCM groups in peril
� Our teams need leadership to enable the recognition they seek
� Super hero leaders tend to be too operational, too tactical
� The value proposition for CCM is unclear to many MD’s/CEO’s
� Many organisations do not know what CCM is (even though they may be doing parts of the role, in pockets)
Copyright © 2010 IACCM. All rights reserved.
What is leadership?
Copyright © 2010 IACCM. All rights reserved.
What does this mean for CCM?
� Vision –� What is CCM for? Articulate, explain, sell, get backing
� Based on: data, metrics, research, increased shareholder value
� Challenge the process –� Look beyond the status quo, innovate for greater value
� Enable others to act –� Help our teams to work out how best to achieve the vision
� Encourage the heart –� Give recognition for achievement
� Model the way –� Set standards of excellence, set personal example
Copyright © 2010 IACCM. All rights reserved.
Research to Support Leadership Vision
How can IACCM help?
Examples of annual and topical surveys• Commercial Policies & Practices
• World Economic Trends
• Service Industry ‘Ease of doing business’
• Benchmark of Limitation of Liability Terms
• ISO 28000; Your view
• Risk Management
• Top Ten Negotiated terms
• Annual Business Themes Survey
• Annual Talent Survey
• Electronic Signature Adoption
• Business ethics and contracting study
Copyright © 2010 IACCM. All rights reserved.
eLearning Curriculum
Copyright © 2010 IACCM. All rights reserved.
Summary
� Contracting is increasingly recognised as a core strategic competence for companies
� Our people are hungry for recognition, to feel valued
� The leader’s role is to move us beyond superhero fire-fighting
� Fact-basis of research and measurement of our value is key, as is spreading the word
�We can and must become a strategic core competence of our organisation
Copyright © 2010 IACCM. All rights reserved.
DOC ID© Chevron 2010
Developing the Professional Contracting Community
March 23, 2010
Tom CrimiL&D Manager
DOC ID© Chevron 2010
Developing the Professional Community
• People development for skills: gap assessment, planning,
and closure through competency development.
• Knowledge Acquisition Strategy Development.
• Professional Associations (e.g. IACCM) Connection of those
trained professionals with a worldwide network of fellow-
practitioners and mentors through the IACCM on-line
community.
• Certifications e.g., addition of key personnel to our
worldwide professional network, spreading greater
understanding and mutual respect across traditional
borders and business cultures.
56
DOC ID© Chevron 2010
Developing the Professional Community
• Progressive Job Assignments.
• Facilitative Mentoring.
• Networks and Communities of Practice
(COPs)/Communities of Interest (COIs)
Websites/ Message Boards e.g., experience
in the use and value to be derived from
networked technologies and collaborative
tools.
57
DOC ID© Chevron 2010
Developing the Professional Community
Networks and Communities Require:
• A Steering Committee
• Regularly scheduled “meetings” – virtual and
traditional
• Defined and value-adding objectives
• International and global scope and/
participation
• Possible sub-teams assigned to focus on issues
and efforts.
58
DOC ID© Chevron 2010
Developing the Professional Community
• Get feedback from the user community on
desirable professional development services.
• Share tasks related to alignment to universities
and business schools (discussions, negotiations,
etc).
• Discuss future models, trends, issues, styles,
means of interaction, user experiences.
• Get users’ ideas, case studies, future
development ideas, and share issues on making
Professional Development (PD) happen/how to
implement for best effect.59
DOC ID© Chevron 2010
Developing the Professional Community
• Discuss whether the formation over time of a
User Forum would be constructive (representing
the mass of users, the point of interface in each
company), discuss possible conference for such
users covering a wide range of training
speakers, issues, ideas).
• Review output from talent and skill surveys and
use as input to strategic direction.
• Consider what survey information is
available/needed to meet Professional
Development.
60
DOC ID© Chevron 2010
Developing the Professional Community
• Conferences/Panel Discussions Training e.g.,
development of a cadre of trained contract
negotiators / contract managers who understand
worldwide practices in procurement and sales
contracting.
• Organizational Communication Support e.g., visible
investment in the skills and knowledge of contracts
and SCM/procurement practitioners in the markets
of the future, assisting in support of ethical
standards and the development of international
trade.
61
DOC ID© Chevron 2010
Developing the Professional Community
Knowledge Management:
• Capture and Retention
• Diffusion of Best Practices
• Invent “Next Practices”
62
Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. 63Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. Accenture, its logo, and High Performance Delivered are trademarks of Accenture.
Getting to the Top 10 for Most Admired Companies in Contract Management
Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. 64
Contributions to the Business
Is your mission and vision clear and focused on business results?
• Measuring your Results: Are you able to demonstrate progress?
• Does your team feel part of the business team or arms-length functional support?
• Value Stories: Are you able to communicate accomplishments without puffery?
– Fact-based– Internally and externally
Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. 65
Internal Support and Sponsorship
How short and strong is your chain to the top?
• Mandate: Is CM required to be an integral part of company business?
• Escalation Path: Do you have one? And what happens if you exercise it?
• Separate Budget: Are you entrusted with financial accountability?
Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. 66
Lines of Authority
What are you held accountable for?
• Authority to influence outcomes: How trusted is your voice?
• Power behind the throne: Do you have delegated authority?
Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. 67
Role Definition
Is your role understood and distinguished from others in the organization?
• Will the Business team work call you first?
• How do you communicate your role and responsibilities?
Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. 68
CM as a Profession
Are your team professionals?
• Sponsorship for Professional Membership: IACCM
• Skills Training: How do you build the talent in your organization to remain business relevant?
– Do you train your own teams or leave it to somebody else?
Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. 69
Consistency of Service
Is a Big Mac a Big Mac?
• Processes: Do you have a playbook?
• Adaptability: Are you responsible for all CM teams in all countries?
– Do you have a plan to adjust to local conditions (e.g., recruitment pool, culture, business maturity, etc.)?
• Evaluation: What are you doing to continually assess and improve your game?
Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. 70
The Right People
It’s all about finding and retaining the right people
• Adaptability: Are you responsible for all CM teams in all countries?
• What is the role of your leadership team?
– Escalation point? – Fixer? – People development? – Is there a visible, attainable career path?
• Staff Rock Stars
Copyright © 2010 Accenture All Rights Reserved. 71
Questions?