i know thee not, old man
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
1/16
1
I know thee not, old man
Robin Bale
The designated public
Aesthetics can be understood ... as the system of a prioriforms determining what presents
itself to sense experience. It is a delimitation of spaces and times, of the visible and the
invisible, of speech and noise, that simultaneously determines the place and the stakes of
politics as a form of experience.1
Public space is the space of the visible, the arena in which the questions of who has the right
to be visible in that space are played out. To be public is to be visible, to be visible is to be the
public.
The present system, whose philosophical basis could be accurately described as market
individualism2, has given rise in recent decades to the dominant model of subjectivity
Homo Economicus. That fabled entitys rational choices, as voter and consumer, underwrite
that system. Voters choose a party, consumers buy thingsand, more recently, also run public
services efficiently in their spare time. Because choice is the mantra andjustification of the
system, the old liberal welfare state, with its universalism in terms of provision, is now
obsolete. We must all, as a previous Prime Minister told us, modernise or die.3It is the
nature ofHomo Economicus, focused on improvement, calculating his striving (aspiring
would be the current buzz word), to consider the present as merely a vestibule to the future
when his investments, of time, energy and capital, come to fruition. This temporality affects
spaces, individuals and practices, consigning some of them to an unredeemable past.
There are some problems, however, with atomised choice and the pursuit of advantage. If all
our collective and individual welfare amounts to is making choices, what are we to say to
those who, like Dostoyevskys underground man, respond to this headlong rush into a bright
and shiny future with: And why are you so firmly, so triumphantly convinced that only the
normal and the positivein other words, only what is conducive to welfareis for the
advantage of man? Does not man, perhaps, love something besides well-being?4Valorising
the choices of autonomous agents, because they are their choices, can lead some benighted
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
2/16
2
souls to think they have the right to do what they want; resulting in an epidemic(a nicely
medicalised term) of what has come to be called anti-social behaviour. The contemporary
response to this willed difference seems to be therapy and the law.
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
3/16
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
4/16
4
It is from therapy that we get a concept which seems to have become common currency
within public discourse, that of dependency on benefits, public housingused as both
something reprehensible in itself and morally harmful to the dependents. They must be
weaned off,for their own good. Thus, we can have government ministers speaking of
dependency culture5in reference to claimants of state benefits, as if the sick or unemployed
constitute a separate group within society. Dependency is projected as a euphemism for
addiction, something that clouds the lucid self-presence of the choosing subject, breaks the
hermetic seal that protects that core from the contingency of need and undermines the
legitimating function of choice.
An illustrative example: We have created and are perpetuating a vicious circle of
dependency. The challenge is to recognise the individual households need and to support this
through income subsidies allowing people to make choices for themselves in the market.6
On 24 October 2010, I led four people on a walk from Curtain Road, on the fringes of the
City of London, to Shoreditch Park. As an integral part of the piece, I drank alcohol
throughout as we walked, and encouraged the other participants to do likewise. The skewed
perspective this gave, both in the effects of the alcohol on the participants and the effect of
the knowledge that they were performing as street drinkers, was necessary, as I hope will
become clear.
The impetus for my first conceiving this event was the imposition, by Hackney Council, of
Alcohol Control Zones in several discrete areas along my planned route. These zones,
otherwise known as Designated Public Places (DPP), are areas where, in the words of the
2001 Criminal Justice and Police Act, one can legally be ordered:
(a) not to consume in that place anything which is, or which the constable reasonably
believes to be, alcohol; (b) to surrender anything in his possession which is, or which the
constable reasonably believes to be, alcohol or a container for alcohol ...7
Refusal to comply with the demand is an offence and, as the Act says, will render the
offender liable on summary conviction to a fine. The fine can be a fixed penalty notice of
50 up to a maximum of 500.
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
5/16
5
The original plan was to take a group to circumnavigate these discrete DPPs and observe
what, in the environment, might have given rise to the measure. Like any other resident of the
borough, I was aware of the tide of gentrification that has swept across it, as in large swathes
of the rest of London. Locally, this has been exacerbated by the recent improvement of public
transport links and, arguably, the fact that the 2012 Olympic Games are to be held here.
The wording of the original orders was detailed about the areas they covered, down to which
side of Hoxton Street was included (west rather than east), for example. One such zone was
tiny, simply enclosing the churchyard of St Leonards Shoreditch, a long standing resort of
street drinkers. I had an idea of what we would find; my assumption was that the imposition
of the orders was partly there to assuage the fears of the newly arrived and relatively wealthy
about their neighbours, the poorwho, after all, cannot afford the newly refurbished pubs in
the borough. Therefore, constellations of tarted-up pubs serving food and Belgian lagers,
specialist shops and expensive delicatessens, new-build private developments, recently
owner-occupied terraces and parks undergoing regeneration would all have been evident.
However, in May 2010, six months after the creation of the separate zones, Hackney Council,
without any fanfare and little publicity, declared the entire borough a DPP. This was
surprising, especially in light of the councils protestations that nothing had changed. In the
online comments to a piece in theHackney Post, Councillor Alan Laing insists: this is not a
ban on public drinking. This point has been made throughout the process and through the
consultation. The council and the local police have expressly stated that it is not a ban on
public drinking ...8In fact, as the comments on the page where it is archived make clear, the
headline of the piece was amended by the addition of the qualifier anti-social to the original
Public drinking banned in Hackney. It seems that council and police were falling over
themselves to make clear that the ban was only aimed at other people.
A report on the councils move contained the following:
Councillor Karen Alcock, Hackneys Deputy Mayor said: It doesnt stop people from
sitting on their ownand having a beerthats not what the powers are there to do. Its for the
persistent drinkers whore shouting and intimidating people, and giving police the power to
deal with them.9
(emphasis added)
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
6/16
6
Alcocks statement gives a clearer indication of the intent of the ban. She differentiates
solitary drinkers from intimidating ones. It looks like drinking in public is not a problem as
long as it is solitaryone is tempted to point out that this would surely be anti-social
drinking, the opposite of the social variety. The worry seems to be more about people
congregating together. We are not informed how large a group of drinkers would need to be
to intimidate the councillor.
Sergeant Matt Devereau, from Hoxtons safer neighbourhood team, said the police would
not be rushing out to confiscate drinks. We wouldnt want to take alcohol from people
having a picnic and some wine in Shoreditch Park, for instance. We would only do it if it was
anti-social and unhealthy.10
Devereau insists that the measure is directed, not against wine-drinking picnic-goers, but the
anti-social andunhealthy (note the conflation of the two terms). Who could possibly be
against health? Only the anti-social, who probably need treatment. So it is not in fact groups
of drinkers, as such, that are the problem. He does not specify who is at risk from this
unhealthy behaviour; whether it is those who are consuming the alcohol (in an insufficiently
social manner) or those who might come into contact with them. It may also seem strange
that behaviour that is unhealthy to the person doing it, but left others unharmed, should
require the intervention of the law.
The largest concern of those against was on ensuring that street drinkers had access to
treatment something we are committed to providing and this will make it easier for them to
so access.11This was from Councillor Laing, describing the substance of objections to the
creation of the DPP. As with Devereaus statement, it purports a therapeutic motivation for
the measure that exists as a complement to the punitive. Why a control order should make it
easier for support workers to access problem street drinkers and help them into treatment
options, as he claims, is rather mysterious. Support workers would surely already know
where to look. However it is presented, this remains an action intended to clear drinkersof
the wrong kindoff the streets and out of the parks; getting them into rehab would be a
means to the same end.
Tim Shields, Chief Executive of Hackney Council and Chair of the Hackney Drug and
Alcohol Action Team, said: This is just one of a number of measures that we will be using to
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
7/16
7
combat alcohol-related anti-social behaviour. We dont want to stop those drinking alcohol
responsibly but we want to ensure that people can enjoy our public spaces safely.12There
have been laws against assault, threatening behaviour and public urination for generations, so
why is there suddenly a need for extra measures to ensure peoples safe enjoyment of our
public spaces? We shall also return to the question of who responsible drinkers are
responsible to shortly.
But first, it is worthwhile at this point to reconsider the nomenclature: DPP, a Designated
Public Place. These places streets, parks, bencheswere public beforehand. However, that
is the point. The tautology is necessary, and will seem less nonsensical, if we take the time to
question what is being designated. One of the defining joys of city life has always been a
certain contingency and heterogeneity in the population of its public spaces. Streets, parks or
squares are simply used by whoever happens to be there. And anyone has the right to be
there. One never knows who one will meet. It seems that this very fact has been viewed with
increasing suspicion in recent years. If what is being specified is a Designated Public,
meaning the users of the place, rather than a Designated Place, what motivates this
legislation might become clearer.
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
8/16
8
Illust.2, Building site hoarding, Packington Estate, 2010, photograph ROBIN BALE
The Public is not the same entity as that public which means, in terms of space, open to all,
and in terms of entities, contingencywhoever happens to be there. The creation of the zones
is a speech act, which like all the most effective ones(Isentence you to life imprisonment,
or You are under arrest, or I hereby pronounce you man and wife) describes a change in
state, and has a police and court system to back it. The Public who will use these
transfigured spaces (the DPP) are being willed into being by that very act of designation. The
spaces that they will inhabit are already demarcated and shaped by the law. These are the
sober, law-abiding, hard-working subjects, who politicians and columnists never tire of
conscripting (as Stefan Collini13has pointed out, official uncertainties towards the market
individualist position are betrayed by the uneasy shifting from individuals to families in
invocations of the basic unit of society). These people who we must become are already
pictured for us, larger than life and in glossy colour, on the hoardings that conceal the
construction of the new-build apartments that are being prepared for them.
On responsible drinking: ... the era of the long boozy lunch is now coming to an end ... many
of us are too busy to fit in anything more than a sandwich at our desks. These days it seems
that youre more likely to find your colleagues down the gym at lunch rather than the pub.14
What I find surprising in this gem (which is fairly representative of the whole site) is that the
problem framed is not that of being too busy to eat lunch beyond a snatched sandwich. The
problem, apparently, was lunchtime drinking, now thankfully consigned to the dustbin of
history along with trade union membership.
Falstaff
Falstaff: Now, Hal, what time of day is it, lad?
Prince Henry: Thou art so fat-witted, with drinking of old sack and unbuttoning thee after
supper and sleeping upon benches after noon, that thou hast forgotten to demand that truly
which thou wouldst truly know. What a devil hast thou to do with the time of the day?
(emphasis added)Henry IV, Part 1, Act 1 Scene 2
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
9/16
9
Soafter a preamble that, I hope, has marked out the territoryto the walk as it actually
happened. The premise of the walk had to change. It would no longer be enough to map out
the discrete zones, look at whatever pockets of gentrification and poverty were existing cheek
by jowl. This was not a matter of localised incursions, the semi-privatisation, or pseudo-
privatisation of a public area. The entire borough was now existing as a zone. It was not that
discrete gated communities had suddenly sprung up, closing everyone else out; more that we
find ourselves within a gated community with strict requirements for membership and no way
to get out.
As the whole of Hackney was now under the sign of the new Designated Public, an
invocation of the same, one could start anywhere, go anywhere, and find it; the eternal and
brightly lit present of the gym, where the machines are equipped with mirrors facing them, so
its clientele can observe their own endless becoming. There was a necessity to find a fracture,
to insert difference. How to thread these spaces together, whilst pushing them apart; how to
consider time and untimeliness?
The reasons for the recently legislated antipathy to street drinkers are probably many; dislike
of the poor is part of it, but it is the visibility of this particular section of the poor that might
be a major factor. They are outside, we have to see them. It is, to a large extent, a matter of
theatre. They parade what might be their dependency, or is quite possibly their choicebut
must be the wrong one. As the user of any drug will confirm, drug time is not normal time.
They appear to live in a different time to everyone else; evidenced not just in the clumsy
movements and slurred speech of the drunk. They are not just passing through, hurrying to
get somewhere else, they stay. They drink in the day, when others have to work, they have
been assumed to be unemployed, or under-employed, avatars of a benefits culture that is
outmoded, an obsolete temporality. They hoard time, so there is less of it for decent people.
The first stop on our way, after the off-licence, was a small brown plaque, halfway up the side
of a Victorian building on Hewett Street, off Curtain Road. It reads: Near this site stood The
Curtain Theatre 1577c.1627 Second English public playhouse ... It was speculation
(though not entirely unfounded) on my part but, for the sake of poetic clarity, I claimed that
there was a strong possibility that this unremarkable street with the van depot at the end of it
was where the character of Sir John Falstaff first appeared.
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
10/16
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
11/16
11
So surfeit-swelld, so old and so profane;
But, being awaked, I do despise my dream.
Make less thy body hence, and more thy grace;
Leave gormandizing; know the grave doth gape
For thee thrice wider than for other men.
Reply not to me with a fool-born jest:
Presume not that I am the thing I was;
For God doth know, so shall the world perceive,
That I have turnd away my former self ...
The cold brutality with which Halnow King Henry the Fifthconsigns Falstaff to the past
is shocking. It is a public judgement, witnessed both by the characters onstage and by the
audience. It is framedthough not without a great deal of ambiguityas a necessary
symbolic act, if Hal is to renew broken Britain. Itlends greater shine to Hals apotheosis as
the chivalric hero of a re-born nation at the battle of Agincourt in the next play. It is part of
that theatres attempt to forge a self-conscious (patriotic) public via the medium of the history
play. It is through Falstaff the exiles eyes that I wished the walk to be seen.
We pass architectural models sitting on top of packing cases in a window on Curtain Road, a
series of proposed futures waiting to be realised
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
12/16
12
Illust.3, Arden Estate Board, 2010, photograph ROBIN BALE
At the top end of Hoxton Street Market we passed through the Arden Estate. In a fanciful
mood, and perhaps as a nod to local history, its blocks all have Shakespearian names. Or it
might have been an assumption on the part of the council that ordinary people have as much
right to the ownership of high culture, or what is now known as Heritage, as anyone else.
Just off the street we find Falstaff House. It is fitting that Falstaffs last home is in the name
of a denigrated form of housing.
The current social housing is warehousing poverty in the core of our great citiescities
which need to be the very engines of economic growth.18The assumed teleology is clear
here; warehousing is the thickened time of stasis. Engines and growth are dynamic, future
orientated.
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
13/16
13
Illust.4, I Love Hoxton, 2001, KEVIN HARRISON, photograph ROBIN BALE
On the roundabout at the top of Hoxton Street, a brightly coloured sculpture of three figures,
two children and a long-haired youth, who points urgently away from the estates back down
the road, stagger drunkenly in crocodile formation towards the market. One of the children
has a fat chain around its ankle, perhaps the only trace left of a long-stolen bike.
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
14/16
14
Illust.5Boulder, 2009, JOHN FRANKLAND,photograph ROBIN BALE
We ended in Shoreditch Park, next to John Franklands sculptureBoulder(2009), a piece of
Cornish granite weighing near 100 tons and around 12 foot high. It is an enormous presence,
a miniature mountain in a relatively flat and featureless expanse of green. Its closed form
seems to bend the space around it with the gravity of its age and weight. Unlike so much
public sculpture, especially that which is part of regeneration schemes, it does not make so
much as a nod to contextlocal communities, anodyne versions of local history. It insists on
its dumb presence and visibility.
In terms of contemporary discourse around art and urban regeneration, this does create a
place, a recognisable landmark, but it is worlds away from the inclusive and upbeat
rhetoric:
-
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
15/16
15
Through aesthetic re-enchantment ... revival and recovery are abetted ... inhabitants are
empowered by the reclaimed environment ... In so doing, the conversion of space to place
builds the self-esteem of the locale, revitalizing all that it touches.19
Frankland, a rock climber himself, has claimed that it is intended to be climbed on and that
this will activatethe piece, but this looks like a sop to those who would demand some sort
of utilitarian inclusivity: the Shoreditch Trust, under whose aegis this work was created, say
that this is a way of playfully debunking the notion of those sculptures in park settings,
which are often fenced off or prominently labelled as not to be touched.20I would say that
it debunks the notion of public art as it stands today. It contains its own time, millions of
years of it, in its unknowable interior, oblivious to the attempts to gentrifyor modernise
its surroundings. It is immovable and gives nothing. One can only look at it, sense its gravity,
or walk past.
I poured beer on it, the most honest homage I could do, and walked away.
Biography
Robin Baleis an artist and writer from London. He makes improvised spoken word pieces.
He studied sculpture at the Royal College of Art and has recently received a scholarship to
study for a doctorate in fine art at Middlesex University, with the working title of The
Performer and the Polity. (http://www.purgeglut.blogger.com,
http://www.robinbale.blogger.com)
1 Jacques Rancire (trans. Gabriel Rockhill), The Politics of Aesthetics(New York:
Continuum, 2006) p. 13.
2 Stefan Collini, Blahspeak,London Review of Books, 32(7), 2010, pp. 29-34.
3 Sara Helm, Modernise or die, Blair tells partners, The Independent, 6 June 1997,
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modernise-or-die-blair-tells-partners-
1254375.html (accessed 27/02/11).
4 Fyodor Dostoyevsky (trans. Constance Garnett), Notes from the Underground, in
Deborah A. Martinsen (ed.),Notes from the Underground, The Double and other storie(New
York: Barnes & Noble,2003) p. 261.
5 Benefits culture is a national crisis that must end, says Iain Duncan Smith,Daily
Telegraph, 12 November 2010,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/8127923/Benefits-culture-is-a-national-crisis-that-must-end-says-Iain-Duncan-Smith.html (accessed 25/02/11).
http://www.purgeglut.blogger.com/http://www.purgeglut.blogger.com/http://www.robinbale.blogger.com/http://www.robinbale.blogger.com/http://www.purgeglut.blogger.com/ -
8/11/2019 I Know Thee Not, Old Man
16/16
16
6 Stephen Greenhalgh and John Moss, Principles for Social Housing Reform, Localis, 15
April 2009,
http://www.localis.org.uk/images/Localis%20Principles%20for%20Social%20Housing%20R
eform%20WEB.pdf (accessed 22/02/11).
7 Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001,section 12, HM Government, 2001,http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/16/section/12#commentary-c1772955 (accessed
25/02/11).
8 Gregor Hunter, Anti-social public drinking banned in Hackney,Hackney Post, 23 March
2010, http://hackneypost.co.uk/?p=3784 (accessed 22/02/11).
9 ibid., Gregor Hunter (2010).
10 Chris Kay and Arj Singh, Anti-social drinkers face fines or arrest,Hackney Post, 18
March 2010, http://hackneypost.co.uk/?p=3668 (accessed 22/02/11).
11 ibid., Gregor Hunter (2010).
12 Team Hackney, Safer Dalston newsletter, May 2010,
http://www.teamhackney.org/may2010-ward-dalston (accessed 20/02/11)
13 ibid., Stefan Collini (2010).14 Last orders for the boozy lunch, Drinkaware, 19 May 2010,
http://www.drinkaware.co.uk/alcohol-and-you/work-and-study/last-orders-for-the-boozy-
lunch (accessed 26/02/11).
15 William Shakespeare,Henry IV, Part 2, Act 2 Scene 4.
16 William Shakespeare,Henry IV, Part 2, Act 1 Scene 2.
17 Germaine Greer, Shakespeare: A Very Short Introduction(London: Oxford University
Press, 2002) p. 24.
18 ibid., Stephen Greenhalgh and John Moss ( 2009).
19 Luca M. Visconti et al., Street Art, Sweet Art? Reclaiming the Public in Public Place,
Journal of Consumer Research, 2010, 36(October), pp. 511-529.
20 Boulder, The Shoreditch Trust, 2009, http://www.shoreditchtrust.org.uk/Physical-Regeneration/Peer/John-Frankland-s-Boulder (accessed 22/02/11).
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/16/section/12#commentary-c1772955http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/16/section/12#commentary-c1772955