.

ti. ti.*'' I

i'',

I .I .r

---- :.:, .. ,_

.1 ,, it

*r'i

11

dl

11'1111a

V.t,k6C,t)Py -nt tiTION 11.'0 I HAW

ED 106 958

AUTHORTITLE

INSTITUTIONPUB DATENOTEAVAILABLE FROM

EDRS PRICEDESCRIPTORS

DOCUMENT RESUME

A, 00i 151

Barr, Charles W..

The School in the Urban Comprehensive,Plan: 'A PartialBibliography. Exchange Bibliography No.. 264.Council of Planning Librarians,. Monticellp, ill.

Feb 7240p.Council of Planning Librarians, P.O. Box 229,Monticello,.Illinois 61.856'($4.00)

MF-$0.76 HC-$1.95 PLUS POSTAGEAnnotated BiLliographies; Community Development;Community Planning; Educational Finance; ElementarySecondary Education; Facility.Planning; *Planning;*School Community Relationship; *School. Planning;*Site Analysis; Site Selection; Urban Environment;*Urban Schools

ABSTRACTthis partial bibliography stresses urban and school

planning co ncepts that influence community physical development andits financing. It is not concerned with the buying of children as apolicy, nor with curriculum matters, racial issues, or even schoolbuilding design, except as.they are related to site qualifications.Reports of city planning commissions on surveys of school facilitiesand projected needs are omitted, for the most part, as are schoolboard studies of school programs, facilities, and staff.organization._The intent is to include articles and books ghat, collectively, willgive a historical perspective to planning concepts evolved by bothurban planners and school planners. The thirteen sections of thispartially annotated bibliography cover cooperation between cityplanning agencies and school agencies; background and general works;population consideration; school community educational relationships;school-community financial relationships; school districts; schoolsize; school types; architectural, curriculum, and siterelationships; general articles on sites;, school-park sites; siteplanning; and site standards. (Author/1'Rn

10,

I

Council of Planning Librarialis- E HAN BIBLIOGRAPHY

Jd

February 1972 264.

THE SCHOOL IN THE UCBAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:

A Paefial Bibliography.

Charles 'W. Barr, Associate DirectorSchool of Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture'Michigan State University

,

S DCPARTME NT OF HEALTHEOVCATION WELFARENATIONAL iNST4TUTE OF

ECIRK,Ax,064

tx- v l F f- IVA4".0 f v. -II. Z.`

`k w

E .. *. vF: p Q

41

If

Mrs. Mary Vance, EditorPost,Office`Box 229

fllinois 61856

°T)

N

-

,COUNCIL OF PLANNING LIBRARIANS1

Exchange Bibliography V24

1

THE SCHOOL IR THE URBAN 011REHENSIVErYLAN:

A Partial Bibliogfaphy

Charles IA. Barr, Associate DirectorSchool of Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture

Michigan State University

a

NTENTS

Runibe:s

4

INTRODVCTION

800PERATION BETWEEN THE CITY PLANNINGAGENCIES AND-SCHOOL AGENCIES 1 - '42.

GENERAL BACKGROUND AND GENERAL WORKS 113 - 82

POPULATION CONSIDERATIONS 83 - .97'

SCHOOL-CCEDNITY ZDUCATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS 98 1137

SCHOOL-COMMUNITY TINocIAL RELATIONSHIPS '%138 - 174

SCHOOL DISTRICT 175 - 185 ,

SCHOOL SIZE ... 186 188

'4CHOOL TYPES..., 189 - 209

SITE - ARCHITECTURAL, CURRICULUM.SITERELATIONSHIPS 210 - 227

SITE - GENERAL ARTICLES 228 - 252

SITE - SCHOOL-PARK SITES 253 - 257

SITE PLANNING. , 258 - 264'

SITE STANDARDQ t 265 - 270

3

.1

1'

^ .

CPL'edhange #26t

INTRODUCTION1

o, ' . . ,,,' .

. ... - ..Public schools arse. an essentialeiement.92 the Americanebrmminity. So important, in fact,,that in most sections of the ..i

nation a separate government,al unit is.ueed:for supervision 9ftheeducation system.': This creates many problems for coordinating .

school building and siting with'planningotHer comhunity develnp.. . ,ments. - . s

...

- . ... .

. .

.....ducatiohal philosophy haS ., hanged greatly; especial .y &zingthe past thirty years. The older eightgrade publid school wasessentially,a neighborhood unit-built on the premise o4-..a-walldng-dipance. This concept has-had recent changes tot the extremes ofthe small residential-type building for kindergarten, first and t

.

second grade pupils to the large grade school and the-busl.ng of,pupils.. The high school has'also been expanded wider the,prbssures,of administrative costs' and diversification of curricula.' In thepast some cities had a centrally l9cated technical high school forprograms of specSal vocational training. Today, some of the older,

_objectives of ,the techniyal high School are = reappearing in thestorefront and ghetto sOnoois.

Changing conceptsof school curricula and size influencedboth sc4ol architecture and Site needs. The one-story suburbanschool lath its extensive. physical education and outdoor learningfacilities called for increased land area.. This also gOe.rise to,the park-school concept and more recentiyithe.campus plan.- Incontrast, the centralcity school did not have the available landarea for these changes. Varying types of multi-story buildingshave been` suggested for these situations plus' the busing ofout from the central area tOlihere land is more available.

The urban planner in trying to project the physical develop-ment of an area twenty, or more years in thd' future has been caughtwith not only the rapid changes in educational concepts, -but mini-mal communication between school boards and planning commissions.Clarence Perry's theory of using the giade school as a neighborhoodcultural center was the bases of.planning theory in the 1930's and14C's. ,But,with increased busing an&varying expeiments in esV schools, it.was not possible to'ccInCeive a longterm Corm tydevelopment ipatc,ern using the educational system as a foundationstone for the neighborhood. Still, ibe school building and siteare public property andmust be considered for their social objec-tives along vith all other public properties. Mstages in siting'are not easily corrected.

0

Allopub c buildings and improvements become involved in, thepublic budg whether thedAnctions are administratively separ-ated or not. When a planner prepares,a capital improvements budget

f

9

"'

^%f

Si *4

P .3. :OPIrExdtAnge Bibliography

0, A .\he must 'consider the total community's needs and ability td- pay.

.

Thisds the message of thp taxpayers rebelling recentl in elec-,f.

tions,on school' taxes apd.varioUS other types of -asses ments.,

Again, c5ordina4ve effort between.the.school. planner and the urban

planner is necessary:.

This partiarbibliomphy sttesset

. 4,

120

ban and school planning -

concepts which influence coma 'ty physical.4evelopment And its'

financpig, It is liot.coricerne with the busing of children as 'apolic,:rnot. ourri'qulum ratters, hiallissuescox even school , .

.ibuilding design except. g'Iley are rbldted to site gbplificationS;:Practically all city planning commissions have. sprveyed their"sohcOi'facilities and projected napds. These reports have been

.

-omitted, .for the most part,%just as the school board studies ofschool programs, facilities of space and staff' organization hawbeen omitted. The 'intent has been to include articles and books.

-which, calecoivelyl.will give an hiStorical perSpective to plan,fling .concepts.-evoked by both urban planners and_school plannerd.

a

BIBLIOGRAP4$'

CCOPERATIOH BE,TUSELI THE CITY

PLANNING,AGENGPS fIND SCHOOL AGENCIES

Mu& tioh and Urban Planning, Part,--1 and 2. Educational:lducational'TechhOlogy. Special Issueg. Urban1.

Technology, Vol''. To,puo. 9, sok. 1970; uo; 10, ot:'1970.

. Anonymous. Ednctional Planning and Oity Planning. The

Ochuol Executive, Vol. 73 Bt: 1, Dec. 1953, Pp. 75-35.

.

Arbtenheim, Harold S. and C. 3ric:Carls. The Relation of:

Educational Planning to Community annipg,,pp, 76-77;

(Livingston, Lawrence Jr. Urban Decentralization 'and Schools,

pp. 78-81;

M'Menhinick;.Howard K. What is City anning, pp.

i

02-83;

Wailes,. Harry Cooperation is the\ty pp. 84-85.

:

3. Boice , John R.; David Fromm; Don Kenn. Coordinated School

and Community Planning. Stanford, Gal., The School-Planning Laboratory, School of-.Education,Stanford Univer-sity,1959..

Planning forchangep2ederal assistance, in planning;trends; schoOls_of the future.

Q

5

r

flI

4, , CPL'Exchaige BibilOgriphY"

4

4. DriScoe, William 'S. Cooperative" Planning in the School luil,dting ,Program. American School and dniversity, Vol'1 20,1948-49, pp.'231-235. , . g

0

Oakland,. California, case stun of city'plannipg andSchool, planning. A,

5. Buttenhe;1, Harold S. a nd 0: 3ric ,Oarlson. 0The Relation of1 '

4

Educational.Planning to Community Planning. SchoolExecutive; Vol. 73;A, ,DecembPr 1953, PP. 76-79.

..

Four major reasons Tor such cooperative plenning andaction. ,

6. Caudill, WilliaM W. To6ara Better Scholl Design. Aq7Architec-% tural,Record--Book.- New York, F.W..Dodge Corps 1,954.

ac

.

...5,,,Chapter City Planning arid the Sphoq: Plan.. u

._.

# ° 7. Chesapeake, Virginia, Planning, Department'. A School Plan for .

1 Chesapeake, Virginia: 1901985._ Chesapeake, Va., Plan-nirig Departient, n.d.. .:.

y ..

r

General planning considerations for scht-01 sites andproposed locations, prograhming.

4

8. Churchill, Henry S.' Building for School. ana Oolommnity Needs.The American School 'and University, 1948-49, pp. 55-98.

9. Cleland, David I., and 'oi ll i am R. King. Re Onal EducationalPlanning: A Systems View.' 'Educational chnology, Vol. ,

= ,

.. X, No. 10, Oct. 1970,. pp. 2,25. .

'...,

,, 0

Promotes school distriqt cooperation at' a regional levelto provide the context within which local planning can bedone; the planning Process. - -

N ... .

- .

10. 310 Dror, Yehezkel. UrbanlMetapolicy and Urban EduCation. Educa-tional TechAology, Vol. X, No. 9, Sept. ,1970, pp. 15-21.

Innovative changes are needed to meet present and fixture

A urban. problems. Metebliqy deals pith policies on policy-mal4ng. Required changes include: '(1) development of'urban policy sciences knowledge; (2) invention of new

. urban policy tools; (3) explicit Strategy determination;(4) new policy-making institutions; (5) improvemerOr ofurban policy-making personnel; (6). adv4imement of citizen-participation. Changes in urban education include: (1)

educatdon.df adults for more active roles invurban pcliy-'making; (2) preparation of children and retaining pradti-tioners for !law patterns of urban policy- making; 3)

training ne,w types of professionals; (4). development ofpolicy scientists.

r

/ 11.0

t.

4

P .

'5. CPL Exchange Bibliography #2647

11. Eastman, Charles. M: and Kenneth 0: Kortanpk: Modeling SchoolFacility Requirements in New CoMalties. Managemdnt

. Seience, Vol. 16; No. 12, Aug.' 1970, pp. B184-799.

New formulations for Modeling selected dohiel. and,econoMkppfienomena in a new or existing Community. ,

. .

Englehardt, N.L. and Frederick W. Hill. School Planning, in .

Planning 1959, Selected Pipers from,the 25th Anniveisary,'National Planning Conference, Minneapolis, May 10-141.1959.Chicago, Ill., American Society of Planning OfficialS,

1959. .

Mr. Englehar,dt proposes a new.focup for communityplannirg-the educational center; Mr. Hillenumerated spe9ific waysplanners and school people can cooperate.'

4 \13. Feld, Marcia Marker. planning For the Sahool.System. Journel

of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 35/ No..4,13$19:91 pp. 281-283. ,

' (, aA review article of some books on-planning for schoolswith the focus on how school °&cisions are. made.

14. Fischer, John H. The Schools and Urban Planning. OhioSchools Vol`. 46, No. 3, March 1968, pp. 24,25/33;

15: Gibberd; Frederick. Town Desigi. New York, Frederick A.Praeger, 5th editiopp, 1967. Chapter 9, The Neighborhood,

. pp. 255-266.

16. Glazer: Nathan. The School- As An Instrumentin Planning.Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. XXV,No. 4, N07. 1959, pp: 191-196.

Aar

Schools plays a peculiarly dynamic role in ne4hborhoodchange: social' composition, special standards andapproach toward edUcation. Comment by John 'V. Dyckman,pp. 196-10.

17. Grossmeni HOward J. A Planner Looks at Schools. American.. ,,School Board Journal, Vol. 150, No.'51 EV19651 pp. 27-28.,

18. Haan, Aubrey Edwin. Education For the Open Society. Roston,

Mass., Allyn ind.Bacon, 1962.

Chapter 4, "Children Bring Their Families and Neighborhoodsto.Schooly emphasizes the interrelationship of student

' home environment and the planning of his education and'community.

fP

. ,

.4. CPL Exchange BibliograPhy #264.'. ..

, L,

'12. 'Havighurst, Robert J. Implication of Eftcational Changes and...

':; Resoutce Trends for Urban Planners. EduCational Techno-Ink, Vol'. X, No. 9, Sept. jr970, pp. 22-26.

.

AdyocateNmetropolit4 school systems, and attacks lackof planning. , . t.

k3,

'.

.

20. Holy, Russell A. City'Planning and Hot' Zoning Affects theLocation of cool Buildings. The American Sch6C1 BoardJournal, Vol; 12Q, Jan. -June 19501' pp. 32,.33:

21: 1 . COhnunity Plenning'..and the School Plant. The..

Ameritan,School Board JOurnall.Vol.A146,7.No. 5, Nay 1963,pp. ,.:31-32. .

.

.v . .

4'

''' Chief concerns of the relationship of city pla4ng to,school plant planning, -. -

(

22. ' - . The Exchange of Inforthation between Boards ofEducation and City PlanningCommi'ssions. The AmeiicanSchool Board Journall-Vol. 119, No. 1, July 19424 .pp. 29-

30. 9 .. ,

23., Kennon, Paul and Robert Venturi. Schools an Be Interwoveninto Fabric-of New Towne.' Architectural Record, Vol.142, No. 4, Oct. 1967, pp. 190 -192.

Theoretical studies on the incorporation of educational. facilitie4 yin nevi toxins.

.

24. Leus. Donald J. Planning Educational Facilities. New Yorfc,

TheCenter for Applied Research in Education, Inc., 1965./'

2r% Llewslyn - Davies Associates. A New Community in Amherst:(Interim 'Report to the New York State Urban DevelopmenttOXporation.. 4ew York, the author, May 1970.' a.

This plan for a new town to serve a new campus of theState Univdrsity of Nei York inclehes,consideration ofschools, school districts, and their financing.

4,%26: Lonsdale, Richard C. The School Role Wietropolitan Area-Development. Syracusd'Uniyersity Press, Syracuse, N.Y.,1960

6

School-connmnity relations shduld be a two-way process ofintcractiop; metropolitap areaproblems and school concerns.

4

t .a t

4.

:

ti

7. CPL Exchange Bibliography #264

27. Los lavelee County Regional Planning Commission. Future School

Requirements, East Whittier City Sdhool"District. Los

Anples, the author, 1964. e

. t

A mastei' plan for school covers land use, existing and'future population characteriitiCsirojections of enroll-mcntsand a school site plan. ,AbOut one-half of the

District's 13 square miles is withtn the-unincorporatedcounty territory.

28. McLean, Nary. Relation of School Plant Planning to Total Com-ImmiUTlanning. AmeriCan School and University, Vol. 25,

1953-1954, pp. 109-118. Steps involved in planning for

schools; city plans and the schools; relationship to' .

zoning.. ' .

29. McNamara, James F. A Regional Planaingliodel for Qccupaiional

Education. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences: An Inter-

national Journal, Vol. 5, Nc. 4, Aug. 1971,TP. 317-339.

In the modal pUblic schools are viewed as one sector in astate system that includes all formal agencies who produce,ccupationally trained graduates.

30. Norphet, Edgar L. and Char les 0. Ryan, editors. Planning

Effecting Weeded Cliange6 In Education. New York, Citaz-

tion Press, 1967./

Chapter 10, Planning and Effecting Needed Changes inUrban and Metropolitan Areas presents factors to be con-sidered of the community by the superintendent, non -

educators and boards of education.

31. Pethick, Donald R. School and Urban Planning Coordination.Unpublished Master in Urban Planning Thesis, NichiganState UniverSityl East Lansing, Eichigan, 1966.

Thesis on the use of joint Capital improvement programmingto permit better integration and coordination.

32. Raymond, George M. Cooperation Between School and Planning

Boards. The American City, Vol. 68, No. 12, Dec. 1953,

pp. 94-95.

School financing, integration of schools into the master

plan, population estimates.

33. Reiner, Thomas 4. The Place of the Ideal Community in Urban

Planning. Philadelphia, pennsylvanial,University ofPennsylvania Press, 1963.1/4

Chapter 4, The Physical Planning Content of Ideal CoMmun-'

ities.

9

r

'

8. CPL 3ichange Bibliography #?64

34. Rieder, Corinne and Harry Davidowe. Uiban,EducatiOnal Plan-/rang and The Problems of InpleMentation. EducationalTechnology, Vol, X, No. 10; Oct. 1970, pp. 6-20.

11,eder is chief of .educational planning"for l'he New YorkCity Planning Dept. Deptbiof plannerss devolvement ineducational planning.

.

.

354 Segoe, tadislas 4nd others. Local Pldnning Administrktion,

Pp.. 547 -553. School Plant Planning. ,Chicago, Illt,'TheInternational City. Managers, Assopiation, 1941.

Asgunptions, considerations and standards, methods ofstudy in preparation of a putilic school system plan.

36.Sohn, Frank.__RelAion of School Plant Planning to'COmmunityPlanning. The American School and, University, Vol. 19,1947-48, pp: ?1-33.

Community planning procedure; the Master Plan; neighbor-'hood concept and :..te school, scope of coienunity participa-tion; the school plant.

37. Stanford University. SchoolR.; David Fromm; Don Keand Community Planning.Laboratory Publication,

lanning Laboratory. (Boice,,John"y, editors). Coordinated School

11

Stanford, Cal., A School Planning959.

\

Trendsn urbanitation Ind planning fpr the metropolis:coimnunication between community, voters, schools; schoolsOf the future.

38. Tulsa (Oklahoma) Metropolitan Area Planning'Commission. 1975.

Metropolitan Tulsa Public School NeedS. Tulsa, the author,,1960.

Major forces affecting public schools; existing character-istics: public school standards; 1975 requirements; pro-gram of action.

39. Waechter, H.H. The School and City and Regional Planning.American School and University, Vol. 25, 1,95344, PP. 119-128.

k plea for performance standards in zoning, master plan;use of land reservoirs, master plans for schools.

Ito. Wayland, Sloan Rigdon;,Edmund de S..Brunner; Wilbur C. Hallen-beck. Aids to Community Analysis for the School Admini-strator. New 'fork, N.Y., Columbia University, TeachersCollege, Bureah of Publications, 1956.

-1 0

9

CPL Exchange fibliography #2.643-

.,.. ,

41;aleincratib,.Ruth G. and Leah D. Greisthan. Bridging the Gat, Be-tween Public AdminiStratioh and School AdindnistratiOn...

School. and Society, Vol. 93, NoveMber 13, 1965, pp. 433-

. : 437. ' 4.

.. ..

. - ,

Uses New York City as an e:kAmple of need to coordinatefinanciarthatters and.activities-of pOlicagencies.

...---- . e

heaton, William L.C.' Urbsin and PietropplitanDeVelopment, in.Designing Bducationl'o tb,Future, rol;'1,' Prospective .

. Changes in Society by 1980,.pp. 139-154 e ed byEdgar,L.jlorphet .end David L. Jesser. hew York, itation Press,

.1967. 4. .

,

GENERAL BACKGROUND HD GEITE'RAL CORKS.

43. American Association of _School Administrators. Commission onSchool Buildings. Schools f6r America. Washington, D.C.,Americ-n Association of School Administrators, 1967.

. .

Particularly pertinent are Chapter 6, The SchoolBite and.

.Chapter 7,., Schools in the City., .,

,

,.,

- . ,442ArC'hitectural Forum. Schools. Architectural Forum, Vol. 91,

4

No. it, Oct. 1949, entire issue.e,-

Post-war building boom; comparison of building problems;planning for better schools; case studies. - .w`

.

\ ,

445. Architectural Forum. :Schools - A Look Backward and Forward:Architectural Forum, Vol. I05, Noi 4, Oct. 1955, pp. 129 -

1555. .. . .

s

A disbussion'of the various types of school architectureand its philosophy; examples With plans,photos.

-46. Bolfens, John C. Special Distri&t,Governmentsein the Uhit dStates.. Derkeley,Cal., University of California Press;1957.

,

Chapter 6,School Districts, covers organizational fee-tures,intergOvernmental relations.and financittg,.bndreorganizing trends..

47. Brownell, bbBirable Charpcteristicsiof,DeccntmlizedSchool Systems'. Phi Delta KaPpan, Vol. 52, No. 5, Jan.1971, pp. 286,288x.'

48. ., Schools in the Cities :, Economic and SocialDevelopments. Vital Speeches. of the Day, Vol. _31, No.

12,, April 1, 1965, pp.,380 -3849 '

.+

Speech delivered Jan.. 27, 1965 before the Symposium in'Urban Problems, John Carroll University, Cleveland, Ohio.

. N 4

0

10. CPL Exehange.Bibliography #264

'45s: Campbell,' Roald. Fay; Lucy-, is Raphael O. *strand. Mu-, cation and Urban Renaissance. hew York, John Wiley and

Sons, 1565.

The model cities program: a6 .approach- to the problaks ofurban education; The Pittsburgh Plan for model citiesneighborhoods, pp. 73.92

..

. 4

"a50. *Carlson, Richard O. an4,

d Others. Change. Processes in the Public.,'Schools. 2ugene, Oregon, The Center, for the Advanced,,

,C... Study of Educational Administration, UniVersily of .Oregon..

A report of a seiinar conducted with public.school offi-cials on planned.change,processes and.their'execution,

.. .

51..Castald.1, Basil. (Massachusetts School Building AssistanceCommission). The Road to Bettchools. Cambildge,lia:as., The Hew Zngland School ,Development Council) 195....,'

lischpol plani9ing workbook which includes: the longAange I...an and bow to select a site. .

.

\ 52. Chase Williarall.\prOblems in 'Planning Urba: School Facili-'

ties. School.'Plant administration Servile, Bulletin 1564,Mo. 23. lipshington,. D.C., U.S. Dept. of Health, Educe-

(,. ,tion,.and Welfare. .o /4 /

/1

'Major.areas affeCting school facilities planning in metro-pol3tan central cities are:. urban renewal, expresswaydevelopment, zoning, building codes, popu7ntion migration,site needs, comminity relations.

s'l

53. Congressional Quarterly Service. Federal Role in Education.Second Edition. Mashington, D.C:,40ngressional Quarter-

'4,1y Service, 1967..,

\

.\

,

.. .

Oves the chronology of Ini:jor aid programs, pp. 3-33.4

54. Conant, JamLs Bryant. Slums. Schools in Metropolitan

Book Co., Inc., 1961.

and Suburbs: A Commentary onAreas. Hell York, MCGraw4fill

55. Fantini, Marioand Gerald Weinstein. 'Making Urban SchoolsWork. New York, Holt; Rinehart and 'Winston, 1968.

.

iSocial real and the urban school; relationship ofthe\school to the community, pp. 52-61.

4

. 4

I

r

at

(57. Garber, beep 0r and Newton Edwards.' The Public School in

Our Go4rnmental Structure., (School Law-Casel?ook Series. No. 1). Danville, .Ill Interstate Printers and Publish-

ers, 1962.

.

11. CPL Exchange Bibliography V264

4 /Feathersto'ne, Richard L. and Frederick Hill. Urban SchoolDe-

centraliz,7tion-Part,V, Model ',.and' Futu'rL Probabilities.

American School and University, Vol. 421. No. li.Sdpt..1969, pp. '62-66. , 4

Argumepts. for an organizational structure. using elementsof both centralization and decentralization. ,Previous

Parts-cover N.Y.City Schools, attitudes cfeducational'groups to'decentralii,e.s

,

'5er. Garber, tee.0;.and :II. Edmund Reutter1 Jr The YearboOk'of --..

'School. L'aw. Danville, Ill., The Interstate Printers and-.-,Publishers.. .A, V' . 1 . r o

?.' '5..,

Published annually and -contains cases in each volume on\school finance, use of-School Property, and the schooldistrict. 4

59. Gauerkel 'darten S. .School/Law. 'dew York, U.Y., Center for

Applied Research, 1965.

£0.Graham, Grace. The Public School in the AMerican Community.

1:7,

H-awYork, N.Y., Harper & Raw, 1963.

-i0A . 1, The book is divided into three subject areas: under-

standing the school in its 'societal' setting, the. national

comMunity and the sChopls,,and the local community andthe schools.

* s

61. Havighurst, Robert 'James. Education in.hetropolitan Areas.loSton, Allyn Cs aeon, 1966.

Chapters on: metropOlitan schools and social structure;urban and metropolitan development; types of schools ind.the metropolitan area; school systems, urban renewal, and.planning.

62. a . and Heiman G. Rickey, editors. Metropolitanism:. Its Cnallenge to Education. Natiohal Society for the

Study of Education, 67th Yearbook, Part 1. Chicago,Illinois, University of Chicago Press, 1568.

Articles covering various aspects of Metropolitan devel-opmentliedUcation and government; the organizing, staff-ing and financirislif metropolitan education; case studies

Hartfordllwin'Cities, Nashville.4

oe /1 7-

ct-

12. CPL Exchange Bibliography 264

63. Havighurst2 Robert J.; Frank L. Smith; David E. Wilder. A Pro-file of the Large-City High School-.- Ilm-Bulletin of theNational...Association of Secondary School Principals; Vol.55, No. 351, Jan. 1971.

The- issue9is divided between the profile and the ereatiohof new models for urban education.

64. Havighurst, Robert J. Clarence Seniof; Lewis R. Fibel. Prog-_ ndsis for Educational Facilities, Planning-1966, pp. 148-

168. Chicago, Tilinois, American Society of Planningofficials, 1966.

Review of voluntary efforts among school districts' andpolitical unite in achieving improved metropolitan-widefacilities;Avolution of education and call for federaleaid; role. 'of 'community colleges in training urban assis-,tants.,-

/65. Henry, Nelson B. and Jerome G. Kerwin. Schools and City Gov-

ernment. Chicago, Illinois, The University of Chicago/Press, 1938.

Legal basis of school-City relationship; control of schoolbudget; services rendered by each.

66. Hinson, aurie and Francesco Cordasco; Francis P. Purcell.Education and the Urban Community. New York, AmericanBook Co., 1969.

Forty-nine readings dealing with the crisis and conflictsin education that eiiet in urban areas.

67. Hudson, Robert B. RadburnYA Plan of Living; A Study Made forthe American Association for Adult Education. New YorkCity, American Association for Adult Education, 1934.-

68. Leu, Donald J. Planning Educational Facilities. New York,Center for Applied Research in Education, 1965:*

Chapter 2, Determining Local School Building Needs;Chapter 5, Capital Outlay Progiams.

69. Manning, William R. Decentralization: Problems and Promises.The Bulletin of the National Association of SecondarySchool Principal 9, Vol/. 531.11e. 339, Oct. 1959, pp. 116 -123.

What Washington, D.O,, is doing for their central citystudents._

13. CPL Exchange Bibliography #264

70. haryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission.-'MasterPlan of Schools, Parks, and Recreation for the Maryland-Nashington Regional. District. Riverdale, Maryland, theautHor, 1956.

Concepts, standards; objectives, financing,apd proposedfacilities, illus., maps.

The Michigan Department of Public. Instruction. 'Planning togetherfor Better School Buildings. Bulletin No. 412 published

'.- in 1950, revised 1956, 1965, 1970. Lansing, Michigan.

State, local responsibilities; plpning precedes build-ing; selection, development of sites; building design,elements, safety.

72. horphet,,Edgar L. and David L. Jesser, editors. EmergingDesigns for Education, New York, Citation Press, 1968.

Chapter 2 gives background and changes -in the schooldistricts; Chapter 4 considers various ways a state mayaid the financing of education.

73. New York University. School of Education. Center for Com-munity and Field Services. Levittown's Schools and theFuture of the Community: A Survey. N.Y., Hew YorkUniversity Press for the School of Educa40P, 1954.-

Levittown, N.Y.; survey. techniques; social backgroundof the city] trends of child population; school, re-creation conditions and needs including school sites andtransportation.

71.. 'Oakland County (-Michigan) Planning Commission. Students andBuildings for.Edudation. Planning Quarterly, Vol. 3,Ho. 4, October 1960, whole issue.

Historical background, educational organization, financialanalysis, public and parochial systems.

75. Pressman, Harvey. New Schools for the Cities; Designs forEquality and Excellence. Washington, D,G., Hew CommlinityPress, 1967.

Amer about future of public schools; proposed remedySand alternate design for new schools; anti-poverty pro-gram.

0

14. CPI, Exchange Bibliography #264

76. Punke, Harold Herman. Community Uses of Public School Facili-ties) New York, Kings's Crown Press, 1951.

Court rulings are digested to present; uses for whichschool authorities may acquire' facilities, uses of facili-ties, reversion of property, tort liability and socialimplications, table of cases.

77. Reutter, E. Edmund, Jr. and Robert R. Hamilton. The Law ofPublic. Education. Mineola, N.Y., The Foundation Press,1no.3,..1970.

Includes chapters orj the legal framework for public edu-'

cation:, state-level:agenoies) financing) use of schoolproperty.

78. Rogers, David. 110 Livingston Street; Politics and Bureaucrac*:\in New York City School System. New York City,-RandomHouse, 1968.1

The author's primary concern is innovation and reform inthe New York City school system. Be uses desegregation asa means of studying the operation of the total system

* which includes-such issues as demographic and housing pat-terns, neighborhood school movement, community relations,and various promotional groups.

79. Stiles, Lindley J. and B.J. Chandler. Urban Schools for theFuture. School and Society? Vol. 90

3No. 2216, November

17, 1962, pp. 395-400:

Education as social capital'; the 0/stem-unit orgairkzationfor urban schools; program pioneering; school finance.

80. Thaden, John F. Equalizing Educational Opportunity ThroughCommunity School Districts. East Lansing, Michigan)hichigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station,1957.

Characteristics of the state's school districts, schooldistrict reorganizations; state aid; interrelationship ofschool district comwanities.

81.toffler, Alvin, editor. \The Schoolhouse in the City.. N.17.,Frederick A. Praeger Inc., 1968;

I

Paper 3, Pressures on the Urban School by George B. Brainconsiders race, old school buildings,` taxes; Paper , The 'Decaying Schoolhouse by Ben 3.Graves; Paper 6, Ci4esand Schools of the Future by Charles William Brubakerconsiders school size and type of structure.

e

15. CPL Exchange Bibliography W264

82. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and elfare. Task Forceon Urban Education. Urban School Crisid: the Problemand dolutions. Uashington Monitoring Service, NationalSchool public Relations Association, 1970.

This was a report of the Task Force subii.tted Jan. 5,1970. to the Dept. of H.E.W.,and printed in the January 19 '

and January 20 editions of the Congressional Hecord.

POPULATION CONSIDERATIONS

63. American Society of Planning Officials. School Enrollme';t byHousing Type. Planning AdVisory Service Information.Re-port 210, May 1966:. Chicago, Illinois, the author.

.84. Belisle, Eugene. Core Cities: Planhing 'and Schools. Urban' Education, Vol.31 No.-4, 196$1 pp. 194-213.

Population movement in New York City, renewal of slumsand need for reeducation of the adults.

85. Bucks Countylyennsylvapial Planning Commiision. Apartments:'An Analyds of Issues and StandardS, 1967.

pcludes cost.,revenue analysis and school children.

86. Burbank, California, Planning Department. Apartment Survey.author, 1963.

The results include population characteristics and the ,percentage distribution of children by school grade.

87.*Foster, C. Bickley and D. Russell Friend. A New Technique forContinuous Population Statistics. Journal of the AmericanInstitute of Planners, Vol. 22, No. 1, Winter 1956, pp.39 -141 .

Population estimating in Bucks County, Pennsylvanial*bas-ed upon school census procedures.

88% Glatt, Charles A. Selected Demographic Factors,That AffectSchool Planning: A Look at Four Northern Citids. UrbanEducation, Vol. 2, No. 1, a966, pp. 35-49. Cleveland,Buffalo, Cincinnati, Rochester.

89. Glazer, Nathan. School Integration POlicies in Northern Cit-'ies. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol.30, No. 31.August 1964, pp. 178-192.

Integration. movement poses a major challenge to profess-ional standards and approaches.

,

/7

rr

, %.

16. CPL Exchange-Bibliography #264k, . 1

r.

1

90. Grq#aman, Hoiiard J. Survey and Analysis of New ApartmentConstruction in a Suburban County. -Norristown) Pennsyl-

vamia,,Montgomery County Planning Commission, May-1965.

91.0Hauser,.Fhilip N. Population Trends - Prolbgue for EducationalPrograma, in Designing Education for the Future, Vol-. 1,'Prospective Changes in Society by 1980, pp. 23-56, editedby Edgar L. Morphet and David L. Jeiser. tiew York, pita-,tion Press, 1967,

L

92.- Kalbach, Warren E.; George C. Nyer4 Johri R. Walker. Metro-politan Area Mobility: A'Comparative Analysis of FaMilySpatial' Mobility in a' Central City and Selected Suburbs.Soc101 Forces, Vol. 42, Mar. 1964, pp. 310 -314.

ThiS study is based upon data of family migration histor-ies for a Sample of jianior -senior high school students in

, the Seattle -area.

,

93. Los Angeles City School Districts. Where Do Our Junior HighPupils Live? Los Angeles, California, the autbor,1963. '.

The fo'cus of this study is the type of dwelling (single,duplex,,multiple) in which students were housed. Itwasto answer questions concerning apartment house construc-tion upon school enrollments. Similar studies were madefor the elementary and senior high schools.'

Los Angeles City Schools. Educational Housing Branch. Tran-.iency: A Study of ,Migration in 'Los Angeles Elementary8chools,,1959-1960. Los Angeles, Cal., the author, Nov.i961..:,

95. Maryland- National Capital Park and Planning COMmission. Apart-ments and Their Impact on the Montgomery County Elemen-tary Schools. Riverdale, Maryland, the author, December1958.

96; Norwalk; California, Pianning,Dept. Apartment House Survey:Parking and Family Characteristics, 1962-63.

Family characteristics include age, persons per duellingunit, and length of residence.

971. Senior, Clarence. Effects of Migration on Schools and Commun-ity y Faci 'ties Highlighted. Newsletter: American Societyof Planni g Officials, Vol. 27, No. 2, February 1961,p. 15.

Figures from 7 various sized school districts in fourstates on in-migration, out migration and net gain orloss of pupils.

1.8

p.

'

. ,

17. 'CPL Exchange Bibliography #264.

SCHOOL-COMMUNITY .EDUCATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS

98.'Arcadial California, Planning Department. A $tatistical Comrparison of Multiple-Family Dwelling Units and ElementarySchool 'Enrollment.-Arcadia, Cal., author, 1970.

Research and methodology; under present conditions, apart-ments cannot be said to have an impact upon the studentloads experienced by the elementary schools.

99. Bailey, Stephen K. The City as Classroom. The Bulletin ofthe National Association,of Secondary School Principals,Vol. 55, No. 351, Jan. 1971; pp. 163-172.

100. Bendiner: Robert. The Politics of Schools; A Crisis in SelfGovernment. N.Y., Harper and Row, 1969.

101. Bienenstolj Theodore. Resistance to Educational Innovation.The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 65, NO:8, May 19651,

PP. 420-428.,, .

The study focused on the key factors and conditions thatled the parents in one community to oppose the reschedul-ing of the conventional:school year.

102. Cahill,'Robert S. and Stephen P. Henley. The Politics ofEducation in the Local Community. Danville, Illinois l,

Interstate Printers and Publiihers, 1964.

103..Congrevel Willard J.. Collaborating-for Urban Education inChicago; the Ubodiawn Developmental Project. Educationand Urban.Society,,Vol. 1, No. 2, Feb. 1969, pp. 177,192.

WoodlaWn district has been a major renewal project studyby.the Chicago Plan Commission. This article discussesthe results of efforts-by the University of Chicago towork with a Woodlawn Community Board for Urban EducationProjects in the public schodl system.

104. Fantini, Mario; Marilyn Gittell; Richard Magat. CommunityControl sand the Urban School. New York, Praeger Publish-ers, 1970.

\Quality education and school e. countability to the commun-itk with New York City as an example.

105. Froelicher, Hans, Jr. The School a Its Role in CommunityDevelopment. Marriage and Family Living. Vol. 17, No. 2,May 19540:1621-1.68.

A)

Baltimore's experience of school authorities workingwith the Citizens Planning and Housing Association.

18. CPL Exchange Bibliography ;7264

1.C6. ,Gentry, Harold W.,and JameskBA'Kenney. The Relationship Be-. tween the Organizational Climate of Elementary Schoolsand School Location, School Size, and the Economic Levelof the School Community. Urban Education, Vol. 3, No. 1,19671pp. 19-31.

207. Gittell, harilyn, editor. Educating an Urban Population,Beverly Hills, California, ,Sage Publications, 1967.

Chapter 1, The Urban Environment and Public Education.(demography,, negro, etc.); Chapter 2', The Politics ofEducation; Chapter 3,, Coping With the Demands ,of UrbanEducation. .

. ,

108. Gittell, Marilyn and Alan G. Hevepi. The Politics of UrbanEducation. New York,' Frederick A. Praeger, 1969.

The community power. structure; education and race; casestudiesj community control of the, schools.

109. Gividen, Noble J. and Richard L. Vitt. Local Responsibilities,Procedures, and Relationships in Planning, in Designing

"1 Education for the Future, 'Vol, 60 Planning for EffectiveUtilization of Technology in Education, pp. 170-181,edited by,Edger L. Morphet and David L. Jesser. Hew York,Citation Press, 1969.

110. Greenberg, James D. and Robert E. Roush. A Visit to theSchool Without Walls: Two Impressions: (Parkway SchoolProgram in Philadelphia) Phi Delta Kappan-$ Vol. 51, hay1970, pp. 460-484.

Admissions based upon 3 communities, equal representationof;cityrs population; no schoolhouse, school is an activ=ity, a process.

111. Greer, Scott; Dennis L. hcElrath; David Ninar; Peter Orleans.The Hew Urbanization. New Ybrk0 St. Martin's Press, 1968,

Chapter 3-includes 5 papers on community power andpolitical structure including "The Community Basis ofConflict in SchooOystem Politics", "Political Integra-tion in Suburban Education Communities".

112. Havighurst Robert J. _Metropolitan DeVelopment and the Edu-cational System. The School Review, Vol. 69, No. 3,Autumn.19611 pp. 251-267.

Family income and distance from central business Brea andsocial stratification; school program goals for the mega-

I

'

'

19. CPL Exchange hbliography #264

113. Howard, George C., Jr. and Edith Foster Howard. City- CountyEducational Relationships in Tennessee, Knoxville) Tenne- -

ssee, The University of Tennebsee Bureakt of Public Admin-istration, 1950. '

City and. special district .support for:scllools, pupil

transfer; joint operation; public acts of Tennessee..

114. Iannaccone, Laurence and David K. 'Wiles. !The Changing Poli-tics oI \Urban Education. Education and Urban Society,Vol. 3, No. 3, Lay 1971, pp. 255 264.

115.Kerber, August and Barbara Bommarito% The'Schools and the'Urban Crisis: A Book of Readings. H.Y., Holt, Rinehart'and Winston, 1965.

The changing urban community; impact urbanization oneducation; improved urban schools; programs and projects.

116. Icimbrough, Ralph B. Political Power and Educational DecisionMaking. Chicago, Illinois, Rand Mcilally, 1964.

117. Levin, henry M., editor. Community Control of Schools.Washington, D.C., The Brookings Institution, 1970.

118. Levine, Daniel U.; Birger Bakke; Jacob B. Zack. Case Studiesof Secondary Education it Threelarge American Cities..The Bulletin of the National Association of SecondarySchool Principals, VOL 553 No. 351,5Zan. 1971, pp. 107-160.

Schools of metropolitan Kansas City, Detroit, and NewYork City are studied as td socioeconomic and. ethniccharacteristics of their students.

*119. Levine, Daniel U. The City as School. The Bulletin of therational Association of Secondary School- Principals, Vol.53, No. 341, Dec..1969, pp. 1=34.

The city as a cosmopolitan interchange of cultural pat-terns; isolation of the individual and its perils; ,

academic achievement and questions of helping studentswithin the urban environment.

120. Lonsdale, Richard C. The School's Role in Metropolitan AreaDevelopment. Syracuse, Ilew yprk, Syracuse UniversityPress, 1960.

121. Miner, David W. and Scott Greer. The Concept of Qom ...unity:

Readings With Interpretations. Chibagol Illinois, AldinePublishing Co., 1969:

This book is a series of writings dealing 14th the varie-ties'and phases of community. It is significant that the,school is not considered important enough to be mentioned' as even a minor force.

20. CPL Exchange Bd.b ography 1/2614

122. Morlan, Robert Loren. Intergovernmental Re:..ativas in Educa-tions. (Intergovernmental Relations in the United States,Monograph No. 3). Minneapolis,. Minnesotd, The Universityof Minnesota Press, 1950.

The pUblic school system telations,to state, local,.inter-.

lbcal, and federal government

123,. National Committee for:Support.of the Public Schools.'''''rhePublic School and'thd Life of the Community. Proceedings''Of the Third Annual Cohference, April 25-27, 1965, Vaqh-ingtbn, D.C. Washington, D.C., the author, 1965. et'

The opening session is on the.conference title; third'session, "Who Makes the Decisions About.the Public .

Schools".

124. Perel, Villiam M. and Philip D. Vairo.' Urban Education:Problems and Prospects. New York; David McKay Co., Inc.,1969.

Chapter L, Neighborhood Leadership for Urban Schoolsincludes,questions of school board members, comparisonsbetween large city school districts and small ruralschool districts; Chapter 6, The Urban Community Views ItsSchocaig and Colleges includes questions of immigrdtioninto the cities and its problems; Chapter 7, Adult Educa-tion for Social Change in the Urban Community poses prob -'lems of adults and need for.fUrther study.

125; Punks, Harold H. Community Uses of Public School Facilities.New York, Kirfgs Crown Press, Columbia University, 1951.

116. Queens College, Ipstitilte for Community Studiee. AchievingEducational Equality: the Case for Community Control.Current, No. 103, January 1969; pp. 44-46

Efforts to restore control of local schools to local com-munities within large cities. 4

127. Ramo, Simon and Leo E. Persselin. Changing Functions of .

Urban Schools: the Role of Industry. EducationalTechno-,

,logY, Vol. 10, No. 9, September 1970, pp. 58-60.

128. Rubinstein, Annette T., editor. Schools Against children:the Case for Community Control. New York, M hthly RevLewPress, 1970.

The article by Marilyn Gittal titled "The Community andIts Schools", pp. 2L7 -266 covers the concept of the com-munity school with special application to,the inner-cityand suburban districts and the question of parent-controll-ed schools; Paul M. Sweezy summaries the implications ofcommunity cont491, pp. 284-293.

.

dar, orl

. .

21. Exchange Bibliography #264

(129.tSexton, Patricia Cayo. The American School: A'SociologicalAnalysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall,Inc. 1967.

Chapter 9, City and dftmunity, pp. 101-107.

130. Smiley, Marjorie B. and Harry L1 Miller, editors. PolicyIssues in Urban Education. New York, The Free Press, 1968.

0

' Part 3, Redressing the Imbalance of the Urban School, pp.287-472, discusses: slums and school; desegregation,integration cage studies; equal schools..

131. Street, David. Innovation in Mass Education. New York, John,Wiley and Sons, 1969.

Changes in school-community relations, pp. 145-255.

132. Sumption, Merle R. How to Conduct a Citizens school Survey.New York, N.Y., Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1952.

How a-community can organize and conduct a school surveywhich will give the bodd of education a long-range planfor meeting the educational needs of the community.

133. . and Yvonne Engstrom. School-Oommunity Relations;A New Approach.. New York, McGraw-Hilll.1966.

134. Tnnian, Francis and Jon Magoon. Systems Analysis for UrbanSchool Decision-Making. Educational Technology, Va. X,No. 10, Oct. 1970, pp. 31-33.

135. U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare. Office of Edu-cation. School and Home Program, Flint, 113.chigan: Oneof a Series of Succdssful CompensatoryEducation Programs.Washingtonl D.C., author, 1969.

136. Webb, Harold Vernon. Community Power Structure Related toSchool Administration. Laramie, Wyoming, University ofWyming, College' of Education, Curriculum and ResearchCenter, 1956.

A study of who-influences school policy and plans. invarious sized'school districts.

137. Yeager, William A. School-Community Relations. New York,The Dryden Press, 1951.

22. CPL Exchange Bibliography #264-

SCHOOL-COiUNITY FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS

138. A.M. Virginia County Says No to a "Perfect" New Town - ItWould Mean Too Many Kids. House and Home, Vol. 39, April1971, p. 8. .*

Loudoun County -rejects a new town by Levitt and Sons be-.cause new schools and wider law enforcement would requirean increase in taxes.

139. Anonymous. Federal Aid: Outlook for Model Cities Schools.School Management, Vol. 13, .No. 8, August 1969, pp. 13,

(4 .

140. . Five Lays to Measure Local Support. SchoP1Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 1971, pp. 49-55.

How to evaluate local financia ability to support schoolsand the educational spending program.

14. Barr, W. Monfort. American Public School.Finance. New iork,N.7/1 American Book Co., 1960.

Aiextbopk covering the development 'of pu blic schoolfiAance in the United States and theprinciples(involved,revenues, expenditures and indebtedness, fiscal problems.

142. Berke, Joel S. The Current Crisis in School Finance: Inade-quacy and Inequity. '

The level of financing bears little relation to need.Berke concludes that public finance alone cannot solvethe financial crisis and urges school-men to restorepublic confidence in the schools.

143. Bloomberg, Warner, Jr. and Morris Sunghine. Suburban PouerStructureb and Public Education: A Study of Values,Influence, and Tax Effort. Syracuse, New York, SyracuseUniversity Press, 1963.

. °

144. Burke, Arvid J. Some Proposals Foi Better Financing ofSchoolhouse Construction. Th Nation's Schools) Vol.53, No. 2, Feb. 1954, pp. 48- 1.

145. CornitteeFor Economic Developm t. Research and PolicyCommittee. Paying for-Bett r Public Schools. New York,N.Y., Committee for Economic Development, 1959.

A statement on national policy.

ti

.

23. CPL Exchange Bibliography #264

146. Coons, John E.; Ulliam H. Clune *III; Stephen D. Suggrman4Private Wealth and Public Education: Cambridge, Massa-

chusetts, The Belknap Press of Harvard Univtrsity Press,

1970.

Part 1, examines the existing financial structure in a -

number of states and how state add formulas fail' to elimP-inate the financial inequities; Part 2, is a solution'proposed to eliminate the inequities; Part$3, sets forththe legal path to adoption of the solution by the courts.

147. Fisher, Stan. Another Special School Tax Afflicts the Builder

-:and At $120. Per New House.-

DeKalb County, Georgia taxing each neif home $40.00 for

schools.

148. Fogarty, Frank. Ntw Schools for Free. .Architectural Forum,Vol. 109, No. 4, Oct. 1938, pp. 120-121,198,202.

School provisions by community builders in an effort to

provide schools when needed.

149. Garber, Lee 0. Handbook of School Law for Schodl Administra-tors, Teachers, and Membert of Board of Education. NewLondon, Connecticut, Arthur C., Croft Publications, 1954.

Chapter 4, School Finance; Chapter 5, School Property.

130. . and' Newton Edwards. The Law Governing the,Financing of Public Education. (School Law Casebook.

Series - No. 8) Danville, Illinois, The InterstatePrinters and Publishers, 1964.

It includes legal principle's of takes and taxation, .

school bonds and the school debt;scourt.decisions.

.151. Garvue, gobert J. Modern Public School Finance. The Nab-Milian Co., 1969.

,

It includes chapters on theoretical framework fordecision-making; the allocation of resources for educa-tion; governmental revenue systems; munioilml bonding; ,

state-local systems ogpublic school financial support;federal aid. .

152. Gauerke, Warren E. and Jack A. Childress, editors: Theory",andPrqctice of School Finance. -Chicago; Rand McNally,1967.

t

41,1.1.1.2

CPL ;xchange Bibliography #26,

153. George Washington University. State-Local Finance Project.- Planning for 'AluCational Development in a Planningl-Pkro;

gramming, Budgeting System. 'Vashington, D.C. NationalEducation Assoc., Cornml.ttee on Educational Finance, 1968,

1514. Gittell, Marilyn, editor. Educating an Urban ,Population.Beverly Hills, California, age Publitations,- 1267.

#

Paper: Fiscal Independence and Large., City Sdhool. Systems., by T. Edwara. Hollander, pp. 1o3-i16; `Suburban Education:

A Fiscal Analysis by SeymoUr Sacks and David T. Ranney,. pp 60-76.

.,55.-. Hanciler, Benjamin. Economic Planning for Better Schools.

, Ann Arbor, Ilichigan, University of 'Michigan, 1960:. ,

. .

156= Hanna, Lyle. Preparing. Prop° s'als for Government Funding.(Successful School Administration Series). EnglewoodCliffs, New Jersey; .'rentioe-Hall, Inc %, 1269. . -

. .., P. .

157. 4. 1.CkrOc t.,..G.- taan ar.d Cesar "H. Sabulao: Increa sing Socialand.Econoiniq -Inequalities Among Suburban Schools: AStudy in Echt<lational Aditini'stration and,Finance. DarNille, .-

Illinois, The'Inter::,,t PrintersPrnters and Publishers, Inc.,i,, - 1969. . -

V

4

Social and econoroic inequalities and spatial 'patterns with-:,, in metropolitan areas; dr,:terminants of. spendihg for public

education; typos of school districts as determinants of-ekpenditurei inpac,t of st4e aid.

158. Hirsch; Werner Z.; Elbert W. Segelhorst; Norton J. Marcus.Spillover of Public EducatiOn'Tosts and Benefits. Los

. Angeles,' California3 University of California at Los.Angeles, 19614.

A syitematic -approach' on how education's costs and benerfits: to people outside the school distrIctrhay affectlocal! decision-making.

159. Johns, R.L._ the Economics and Financing of Education,Designing Education for the FutUre, Vol.-5, Emerzing.Designs for Education: Program, Orgmization, Operation,and PUance, 'pp. -193-239, edited by Edgar L. Iforphet alit -

David L. Jesseri New York, Citation Preos, 1966.

160. Kentucky University Oollaie, of Education. Bureau of Schb'olService. ,The Measure of.a Good School: A Guide to Eval-uation of School Systems Adapted Particularly fcfr Use inKenth.c1c,r School Listricts. Lexington, Kentucky; theauthor, 19614.

6)

Sectiop ij is concerned-with t he lair and efficient use offunds and prdjection of finar..,ial needs and resources.

r*PCMI O

0

I

')

25. CPL Exchange Bibliography #264

161. King, Gary W.; Walter E. Freeman;. OveP Schools. East Lansing,

162.

University Institute for Commoeir 1963.

Sociological analysis of subur2 'Describes community setting;

teriAtics and voting record;. tions on the local community

Knox, Gei-ald M.. The, Crisis in School Costs: What Can be

, Done? Better Hdmea and Gardens4 Vol. 49, No. 10, Oct.19,71, pp. 6-10.

163. Levin, Hehry. M.; J esX. Guthrie; George B. Kleindorfer;Robeirt T. StoUt. Capita?. *Embodiment: A New View ofCorOnsatory Education.: Education and urban Society,Vol. 3; No. 3,,May*1971,, 301.-322.

Defines eqUalilly of educatibnal-opportunity and suggestsan alternative means for fihancingiti,

d stopher-Sower. Conflicthigan, Michigan Statety Drelbpment and Servic-

ban school bond election. -

analysis of social charac-summary of findings; reflec-de ci siori-making.

1(A. Levirr,'Nelvih R. and.1.1pn Shank,ditori: EdUcaticnal In-

e vestment in.an Urban Society: Costs, Benefits, and Public

Policy. New Xork, Teachers College Press, 1970.

11'.. Michigan Department of PAlie Instruction. in Analysis of

the Receipts and4jcieilditures of.th.i Michigan POlicSchools for 1945-1914.6.Bulletin No. 1011, revised for'4.954-55, 1956-57, 195748,1961-62, 1965-66, 1967-68,1969-70, Lansing, Michigan.

-

166. NationalCitizens Commission for the Public Schools. How Do -k-We P.4 for Our Schools? A Guide to UnderstandingaublicSchool Finance. New YOiic, N.Y.1.the:author, December 1954.1

.

.167. Rational Education Association. Committee on EducationalFinapee. Financial StAus :of the PUblic Schools: 1971. -

Washington, MC., Nationgl Education Association, 1971.

16B. . ° Committee on Educational Finance.- NationalOonference on School Finances Proceedings, 1958 to date.

dWashingtoh, D.C., National Education association.

0

169.

Each annual conference has a theme,covering some finan-...

Special Project on School Finance. Financingthe Public Schools 1960-19.70. Washington, D.C., NationalEducational Association of the U.S., 1962.

-L

26. CPL Exchange Bibliography 064

170. Peak, Jilint E. How Much State Support'fcr Local Schools?School Management, 'Vol. 15; No. 8, Aug. 1971, pp. 6-7,37.

A survey to find what part Of the bill for education thestate will be paying.

171. Roe, 19 ii am Henry; W. James Giddis; Evan Nielsen. FinancingMichigan's Schools. 3rd edition, revised. East Lansing,Michigan, Michigan State University College of Education.Bureau of Educational Rexrch, 1963.

172. Sheller, Howard G., editor. Conference on. Public ExpenditureDecisions in the Urban Community, Washington, D.C., 1962.Public Expenditure Decisions in the Urban Community.Baltimore, Maryland, John. Hopkins Press, 1963.

Papers on intergovernmental aspects of financing munici-pal services including schools; quality and cost-benefitof services. 1

173. Viles, N.E. Local School Construction Programs. U.S. Dept.of Health, Education, and Welfare Bulletin 1957, No. 20,Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1958.

The study and planning.phases; building construction;financing phase. "t

174. Westchester Coun)y (New Yo4rk) Department of Planning. Select-ed 3nrcalmnt and Financial Data for School Districts inNestchekter, White Plains, New York, 1959. -

Trends in resident-pupil ratio of 0-4 years old to 5-9years olds; taxable real estate value per pupil; expen-ditures per pupil,

SCHOOL DISTRICT

175. Andes, John. Alternative Models for Urban School DistrictOrganization. Educational'Administration Quarterly, Vol.7, No. 11-Vinter 1971, pp. 64-86.

1/6. California Program Pushes Tow rd Big School ConstruCtion.itvtgs. The yation's Schools, Vol, 73, No. 2, Feb.- 19643-

0To obtain savings in school construction by prefabrica-tion Of standardized building component's, 13 Californiaschool districts banded into a consortium.

t'

27, CPL Exchange-Bibliography #264

.177. Sgerton; John and Jim Leeson. Nashville: Experiment in Urban

School Consolidation. Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 48, No. 7,

Mar. 1967, pp. 323 -32Z.

JResults of consolidating all governmental units, includingschools, of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee.

178. Faber; Charles F. The Size of a School District. Phi Delta

Kappan, Vol. 148, No.' 1, Sept. 1966, pp. 33-35.

179. Garber, Lee Orville and Newton Edwards. the Law Relating tothe Creation, Alteration and Dissolution of School Dis-

tricts. (School Law Casebook Series, No. 2) Danville,Illinois, Interstate Printers and Publishers, 1962.

Legal Principles; court cases.

180. Goldhammer, Keith. Local Provisions for Education: the

Organization and Operation of School Systems and Schools,

in Designing Education for the Future, Vol. 5, Emerging

Designs for Education: Program, Organization, Operation,

and Finance, pp. 73-132, edited by Edgar L. Morphet and

David L. Sesser, New York, Citation Press, 1968.

181. Herkimer-Oneida.Counties-(N.Y.) Comprehensive Planning Pro-

gram. Governmental Policy and Liaison Committee. Schools.

Utica, New York, author, November 1966.

The school district .organization and school facilities.

182. Jackson, Lowell. Hawaii - A New Look at Educational Planning.

Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 148, No. 10, June 1967, pp. 510-513.

case study of the Hawaiian school system and its admin-

istration,

183. Thomas, Donald R. Urban School Boards: the Need for Account-

ability. Edlication and Urban Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, May

1969, pp. 289-294.P

184.'Zimmer, Basil G. and Amos H. Hawley. Factors Associated With

Resistance to the Organization of Metropolitan Area Schools.

Sociology of Education, Vol. 40, No. 4, Fall 1967, pp. 331t-

31t7.

P.*

. Metropolitan Area Schools: Resistance to District

Reorganization.. Beverly Hills, California, Sage Publica-

tions, 1968.

Political, social and economic factors which influence ed-

ucational policy decisions.

28. CPL Exchange Bibliography 264

SCHCOL SIZE.

186. Barker, Roger Garlock and Paul V. Gump, in collaboration withothers. Big School, Small School; High School SizeStudent Behavior. Stanford, California, Stanford Univer-sity Pross, 1964.

(Also Lawrence, Kansas, University of Kansas Midwest Psy-chological Field Station, 196g.)

187. Leggett, Stanton and others. The Case for a Small High School.Nation's Schools, Vol. 86, No. 3, Sept. 1970 pp. 41-52.(Condered in Educational Digest, Vol. 36, Nov. 1970, PP-15-18).

ry

High schools for 250 or fewer students are consideredcompetitively desirable.

188. Narkltnd, Sixten. School Organization, School Location andStudent'Achievement. International Review of Education,Vol. 15, 1969, pp. 295-421._

Problems of sparsely populated areas and small schools;problems of long journeys to school.

-SCHOOL TYPES

189. . Junk the Neighborhood School. Architectural Forum,Vol. 98, No. 4, April 1953, pp. 129-135,184,190.

.

New Orleans; plans to build a 90 acre village of schoolsand-play grounds on the outskirts and transport the stud-ents from the central area; social question; maps.

190. ., Little Schools and the Quadranglar Plan. Architec-tural Record, Vol. 118, No. 4, October 1955, pp9. 208-214-

Site plans and concepts for a high school based upon agrouping of small buildings; pronioted for a fast growingcommunity.

191. . Educational Parks: Panaceas With Problems. Progress-ive Architecture, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 174-187.

A pro -and -con discussion, punctuated by the experts in thefield. Existing educational parks are shown and some pro-posed schemes.

A

192. Abend, Jules. Street Academies: .New York's New Deal forGhetto Dropouts. Nation's Schools, Vol. 83, No. 5, May1969, pp. 66-69.

i.

Priva e industry and the N.Y. Urban League have linked!

ef(&Ior s to create special educational programs for bring- 1

ing wagers baekto school.

°

29. CPL Exchange Bibliography.#264

193. Alexander, William N. The JUnior High Schosol: A Positive

View. The Bulletin efAthe National Association of'Secon-dary-School Principals, Vol.: 119, No 299, Mar. 1965, pp.276-284.

Growth of the Junior High School and its experimentation;the emerging Middle School.

191k. Conant, James 13. The American High School Today.: New York,.McGraw-Hill, 1959.

Focus of the study is the comprehensive hg scho 1, whichoffers under one administration and one roo eco (Wry'

education.for almoseall the high school age children of'one neighborhood. ,

195. Cox, Donald andIdza Lazorko. A School Without Walls: A Cityfor a Classrooth. Nation's Schools, Vol. 84 No. 3, Sept.1969, pp. 51=54.

1

Philadelphia's Parkway High School uses the city resourcesfor classrooms. )

.10

196. Davis, DonaldL. and John A. Shaven. Nevi Ideas in Urban Edu-

cation, Nation's%Schoolp, Vol. 83,444.. 1969, pp. 67-82.

The living room school of Hempstead, New York; proposalsfor interdistrict linkages of vocational centers to meetthe urban sprawl; area centers; use of air rights for aneducational superblock; the briefing center for the innercity; cultural-educational cluster.

197. Elsbree, 'Willard S. and John E. Phay. A Feasibility Study ofthe Educational Park Concept for Housing School Pupils inAlbuquerques:NeW Mexico. Albuquerque, New MeNiCt5, the

,authors for the School Board, 1968.

This is a study of housing on one large site several thou-sand pupils ranging from the early:grades through thesenior high9chool in a campus plan.

198. Fernandez, Alfred P. The Educational Park: A Second Look.Journal of Secondary Education, Vol. 45, May 1970, pp. 223,229.

Definition; examples; educational, social, econoMie advan-tages.

-

199. Frankel, Edward. The Comprehensive High School. The UrbanReview, Vol. 2, No. 7, .June 19689 pp. 20-24.

The story of New York City's comprehensive high schoolplan and its reception.

30. OPLExchange Bibliograpb,lc #264

200. Levine, Daniel U. W1F3tever H appened to the Ideal of the Cora-

prehensilie School "Phi DeltalCappan, Vol. WI' No. 2, .

Oct. 1966, rib. 62-64:

201. Mauch, James Es The Educational Park. The American SchoolBoard Jo:11Tel, Vol..150, No. 3, Mar. 1965; PP. 9-11.

202. Meeker, Robert J. and Daniel N. Weiler:, A New School for theCities. Education' and Urban Sbci.etyi Vol. 3, No, 2, Feb.1971, pp. 129-244. ",

replicatable model plan for the reform of urban educe-.

tion, slanted toward. the education of the Urban poor.

203. Rogers, David. The Failure Of Inner City Schools:. A Crisisof Management and Se'rvice Delivery. Educational Tedhno-logy, Vol, X, No. 9, Sept. 1970, pp. 2r-32.

204. Russo, Michael. Area Vocational Schools. American Education(U.S. Dept."' of Health, Education and Welfare), Vol. 20 No.

6, June 1966, pp. 3.,.5

Area technical school complex iri DeKalb, Georgia andMilwaukee, Wisconsin built` with thetaid of federal fundsunder the Vocational Education Act of 1963.

205.- Shaw, Archibald B. and.John Lyon Reid. Tomorrow's HighSchools. Architectural Forum, Vol. 104, No. 6, June 1956,pp. 144-148.

A proposed high school which ties the academic educationto a planned- apprenticeship program and the buildings toa campts type development.

206. Tree, Chris. Schools in Storefronts.- The Urban Review,, Vol.2, No.. ill Feb. 1968, pp. 16-18.

207. Totten, W. 'Fred and Frank J. Manley. The Community School;Basic Concepts Functionl, and Organization. Galien, Michi-gan, Educational Council, 1969.

208. United States Commission on Civil Rights. Education Parks:Appraisal of Plans to Improve Educational Quality andDesegregate the Schools. Clearing House Publication No.9. Washington, D.C., U.S. Commission on Civil. Rights,"Oct. 1967.

209. Wolff, Max and` Alan Rinzler. The Educational Park: A Guideto Its Implementation. New York, N.Y., Center for-UrbanEducation, 1970. ..A full explanation of the educational park or campus planby one of the originators of the idea.

31. CPL Exchange Bibliography #264.

SITE - ARCHITECTURAL, CURRICULUM, SITE RELATIONSHIPS

210. Anonymous. Closing Off the Open Plan. Prr;ressive Architeoy-

ture, Vol. 52, No. 2, Feb. 1971, pp. 68-77.

Still considered controversial, the open plan school isundergoing some new transformations.

211. . One Room Schoolhouse,1972 Style: An Open Plan

Middle'School With Split Level Classroom Areas. School

Management, Vol. 15, No. L, Apr. 1971, pp. 17-20.

A 1,500-pupil middle school on a 25 acre tract for MiddleIsland School District, Long Island, New York.

212. . The School in the Urban Environment. Progressive

Architecture, Vol. 42, No. 5, May 1961, pp. 143-155.

* Study of schools for high density and redevelopment areasof the city; site problems, models of Harvard. student.school designs.

213. . Up From Institutionalism; Inner-City Schooling.Progressive Architecture, Vol. 52, No. 2, Feb. 1971, pp.82-91.

Use of dispersed sites and non-school designed buildingsfor inner-city schools.

214. American Society of Planning Officials. New Physical Formsfor City Schools. Planning Advisory Service, Report 235,

June 1968, Chicago, Illinois, the author.

215. Brubaker, Charles W. and Stanton Leggett. How to Create Ter-

ritory for Learning in the Secondary School. Nation's

Schools, Vol. 81, No. 3, Mar. 1968, pp. 67 -98.

A comprehensive article on the relationships of curriculumactiyitics, space, and building design.

216. Caudill, William W. Toward Better School Design. New York,

F.W. Dodge Corp" 1954.

Physical: analysis of the school plan in relation to thestudent, environment, economy, city planning and planningprocess.

217. Farmer, Margaret and Ruth Weinstock. Schools Without Walls.

NEW York, Educational Facilities Labdratories, 1965.

Profiles of open space designs in schools.

32. , CPL Exchange Bibliography #264

218. Gores, Harold B. Educational Change and Architectural Conse-

quence. Architectural Record, Vol. 126, No. 2, August

1959, pp. 154-176.

A study of correlation between curriculumand school plantplanning; examples of school typeseincluding campus andcluster forms. °

SITE - GNERAL ARTICLES

219. Landreth, Catherine and Howard Moise. Unit Plan for Nursery

Schools. Progressive Architecture, Vol. 30, No. 3,. March

1949, pp. 79-83.'

Diagramatic approach to design and analysis of needs; de-

tail plans.

220. The Architects Collaborative. Schools; Fresh Design Patterns.Architectural Forum, Vol. 105, No. 1, July 1956, pp. 105-

119.

Various approaches to school building planning and theresulting site utilization, plans, photos.

221. Berson Minmie P. and William L Chase. Planning PresChool

Facilities. Amerd,can'Education.(U.S. Dept. of Health,

EducatiOn and Welfare), Vol: 2, No. 1, Dec.-Jan. 1966,pp. 7-11.

222. Castaldi, Basil. Creative Planning of Educational Facilities.Chicago, Illinois, Rand McNally. and Co., 1969.

223. Chase, William V. Urban Design-AthOn.' American Education(U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Velfare), Vol. 43No. 10, Nov. 1968, pp. 4-6.

Architects, city planners, educators brainstorm ceilter-.

city problems in a two-week session.% P

224. Grosd, Ronald and Judith Murphy. Educational Change and

Architectural Consequences. New York; Educational Facili-

ties Laboritories, Inc., .1968.

225. Herrick, John H. The Site. The School Executive, Vol. 753

No. 12, Aug. 1956, pp. 72-74.

, Site design related to the educational program and commun-

ity purposes.

226. Lopes, Frank G. The Problems of School Sites. Architectural

Record, Vol. 121, No. 1, Jan. 1957, pp. 189-217.

Conflicts ofurban development, educational demands foroutdoor space and architectural design in terms of site;

illus., examples.

33. CPL Exchange EibliograptiY #264

227. Tanner, Ogden. The Productivity Push in Schools; Architec-tural Forum, Vol. III, No. 5, Nov. 1959, pp. 110-115.

How can school boards and architects plan for a future notclear?

228. The School As i Generator of Urban Form. Progressive Architec-ture, Vol. L9, No 4, April 1968, pp. 162-173.

Schools are being moved from the back streets to emergeas major influences in the restructuring of urban areas.School plans for Baltimore, Brooklyn, Pittsburgh illus-trate the, trend.

229.1American Association of School Administrators. School Build-ing Commission. Planning, Americals School Buildings:Report of the RASA School-Building Commission. Washing-ton, D.C., The AssociAtion, 1960.

Chapter 10, "Toe Site', is a fullselectiod; developmen factors.

230. American Society of Planning Offici'alCapacities and Locations. Planniformation Report 36, Narch 19521author.

coverage' of acquisition,

s. Pthrning For Schoolng Advisory Service In-Chicago, Illinois, the

, 231. . School Site Selection. Planning Advisory Service

4

Information Report 175, Aug. 1963, Chicago, Illinois, theauthor.

Recommended minimum size of school site and formula for

additional acres by states and type of school; site selec-tion procedure.

o r 232. Barkan, Samuel H. The Relationship Between Sizes of SchoolSites and rand Costs. The American School Board Journal,Vol. 108, No. 1, Jan. 19441 Pp. 34-35.

233.1 California. Bureau ti SChool Planning. (Gibson, Charles D.and Clair L. Eatough) School Site Analysis and Develop-ment: Sacramento, California StateDepartment of Educa-tion, 1966.

234. Chase, William W. Schoolhouses For Big Cities. AmericanEducation, Vol. 1, No. 23 Feb. 1965, pp. 12-19.

235. aleman, Villiam H. Planning Adequate School Facilities asan Integral Part of Large Scale Housing Projects. TheAmerican School and University, 1945, PP. 35-39.

15

44,

34. CPL Exchange Bibliography #261.

236. Eastman, Charles M. and Kenneth O. Kortanek. Yodeling SchoolFacility Requirements In New Communities. NanagementScience, Vol. 16, No. 12, Aug. 1970, pp. 13784-799.

New formulations for modeling selected social and economicphenomena in a new or existing community. Objective func-tions and constraints are formulated that allow for a widevariety of school planning objectives to be. related to thehousing mix and schedule as defined by market, social,economic or administrative constraints.

237. Gregg, Russell T. and W.R. Flesher. A Guide to Site Selectionand Development. The School Executive, Vol. 76, No. 1,Sept. 1956, pp. 77-80.

238. Herrick,'John H. Cincinnati:la Program for Acquiring SchoolSites. The American School and University$ 11947-48, pp.76-79.

239. Katzman, martin T, Decentralizing the Big City Schools. Ur-ban Education, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1968, pp. 156-168.

Inequality in schooling; distributive issues relevant Loschooling.

240. King, Jonathan. The School in the City: A/New Look. SchoolBuilding Research, Publication, 1008; pp. 22-26, Washington;D.C., Building Research Institute, 1963.

Discusses school buildings for large Cities such as:office building-high school combination, school-apartmenthouse units, convertible schools, rental apartment space.

241. Leith, D. Malcolm and Herbert Kohl. Storefront Schools.Grade Teacher, Vol, 88, No. 6, Feb., 1971, pp. 41-59.

Dorchester, Eassachusetts, Head Start Center; NorganCommunity Nature Center in Washington, D.C; Berkeley,California, alternative,educational institutions.

242. NacConnell, James D. kenning for''School Buildings. Engle-wood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1957.

Chapter 4, Site Selection, includes site evaluationratings sheet and other techniques.

243. Harland, S.F., Jr. The Education Park Concept in Pittsburgh..Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 48, No. 7, bar. 1967, pp. 328332.

The article gives the principles for school deploymentthroughout Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; the adapting ofexisting schools to the educational park concept and comrtupity relationship.

.1

35. CPL Exchange Bibliography #24

244. Michigan.' Department of Education. School Plant PlanningHandbook. Bulletin 412, revised. Lansing, Michigan.The Department, 1970.

Chapter 2 covers selection, size and development of'ade-quate school sites.

245. National Council on School House Construction. Research andPublications Committee., Guide for Planning School Plants..

1958 edition contains a.chapter on the school site consi-'deration.

246. New England School Developmer Council. How to Choose aSchool Site. Cambridge, Massachusetts, the author, 1947.

247. Norwalk, Connecticut, Planning Commission. Master Plan ofSchools. HOrwalk, Connecticut, 1960.

Standards used existing school facilities, population -4'

growth; proposed master plan of sites and enrollment pro-jections.

248. Perry, Clarence.Arthur. Housing for the Machine Age. NewYork, Russell Sage Foundation, 1939.

Chapter 3, The Neighborhood Unit ForimlIZ pp. 50-82 andSchool and Social Centers, pp. 205-213.

249. Philbrick, Allen K. The Geography of Education in the Winn:.etka and Bridgeport Communities of Metropolitan Chicago.Chicago University, Research Paper: No. 8 (Dissertationsubmitted Sept. a949).

Educational landin tie gross pattern of land use; patternbackgrounds; major types of problems rooted in patterns,land use policies and planning; bibliography.

250. Roth, Alfred. The New iChoolhouseRevised Edition. Zurich,Switzerland; 'Edition Girsberger (Frederick A. Praeger,U.S.A.) 1966.

Chapter 1, The school within the neighborhood and townarea; many case examples of schools in Europe and theUnited States of America.

251. Stein, Clarence S. Toiard New Towns For America. New York,Reinhold Publishing Co., 1957.

The design of Radburn, New Jersey ased uponhood concept with the school as the center, pp 48-66.

36. CPL Exchange Bibliography #264

252. Sumption, Merle R. and Jack L. Landp. Planning FunctionalSchool Buildings. Ueu York, Harper and Brothers, 1957.

Selecting and developing the school site, pp. 168-182.

. SITE - SCHOOL - PARK SITES

253. Architectural Forum. School in the Park. Architectural Forum,Vol. 107, No.'51 November 1957, pp. 132,133,244.

Suburbs north of Kansas City have s.combined park andschool program supported by a new kind Of tax.

254. Guthridge, Richard C. Two Neighborhood School and. SchoolPlaygrounds in Brooklyn. Landscape Architecture, Vol.44, No. 4i1Paly 1954, RP. 190-192.

First major programs for neighborhood playgrounds in NewYork City; received citations from the ArchitecturalLeague.o

255. Jarrell, Temple, Cooperative City School Planning Pays Off.The American City, Vol. 74, No,. 8, Aug. 1959, pp. 115-116..

Objectives and principles of the Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.,park-school development.

256. Lovelace, Eldridge.. School Park Coordination Will Increasethe Pptential of the Municipality,s Recreation Area atBargain Rates to the Tax Fund. The American City, Vol.74, No. 10, Oct. 1959, pp. 106-108;

Experiences in park school development; illus.

257. Toledo-Lucas County Planning Commission, Sylvania Park Board,and Sylvania Park Beard, and Sylvania School Board.School Park Plans-Sylvania Township and Village. -Toledo,Ohio, Toledo-Lucas County Planning Commission, 1960.

ataidards and principles; school-park centers for variousschool levels; complete plan. 9-

258. . Sunset Community Center, San Francisco: 43 AcresCcaparatively Planned, Architectural Record, Vol. III,No. 3, March 1952, pp. 121-131.

Site plans, building floor plans; a center built aroundan elementary,*junior and senior high school; colored.photos of model. '4

'19

374 CPL Exchange Bibliography #2614

25S. Anonymous. Science Studies Sprout In-Outdoor Settings. NatiohtsSchools, Vol. 83, No. 2, Feb. 1969, pp. 70-73.

I

DeKalb County,.Georgial 65-acre Fernbank Science Center forstudy of natural science and the EacSkimming Outddor Nat-ural Science School near Ottawa, Ontario.

260. Association of Landscape Architects Committee. Landscaping the

School Site (American Architectural Foundation, Imerican

Institute of Architects. 'School Plant Studies, No. BTI-22).

Also in the Bulletin of the A.I.4A., Sept.-Oct. i955, .

Washington, D.C., American Architectural Foundation? 195$.

261. French, Prentiss. Landscape Architecture for Schools. The

Amerigan School and University, 1948-49, pp. 111-117.

262. Hough, Michael and Associates. Principles of Site Development

for 21ementary Schools. Landscape Architecture, Vol. 60,

No. 1, Oct. 1963, pp. 37-0.

263. Simonds, John O. Check List for. Site Planning. Architectural

Record, Vol. 123, No. 5$ Nay 1958, pp. 214-244.

A list of do's and dori'ts in school development, fdlowedby photos, site plans of actual schools.

264. Stoner, George H. New Cohcepts in Planning the School Site.American School and University) Vol. 25) 1953:-.54, pp. 153.4

156.

SITE STANDARDS

265. American Public Health Association, Committee on the Hygieneof Housing. 'Planning the Neighborhood. Chicago, Illinois,

'Public Administration Service, 1948.

266. Broome, Edwin W. Chaf-acteristics of a Good School Site. The

American School and University, 1947-48, pp. 72-75.

Very general statements.

267. Chapin, F. Stuart, glr. Urban Land Use Planning; 'second edi-

tion; Urbana; Illinois, University of Illinois Press, 1965.,

School plOce requirements, pp. 375,377A4-448.

. 268. Flynn, Robert A. Dayton Carefully Studies Sites for New Voca-

tional High School. AmericanCity, Vol. 65, No. 10, Oct.

1950, pp. 109 -11o.

Considerations of size, convenience, accessability, char-acier of neighborhood, parking; relationship to present andfuture growth.

4.

- 36. CPLKacchange Biba-traphy #264

269. Knox, tloyd-Jerry.' School Site Size Standards. ,UnpublishedMaster in Urban Planning Thesis, Michigan 'State. Universitly,ciastLansingl.Nichigan, 1968.

270. Iloyd,`Dele 3. Choosing,a School Site by Analysis. Landscape4.rc1' itecture, Va. 54, No, 4, .)tly 194, Pp. 276 -277.

Detailed case study of Brunswick, Maryland, high schoolsite selection with emphasis upon site development cost.

f

--

A.

4

COUNCIL OF PLINNING fibilg5707----D:17EFEFFMTE540774U----47-

'. . -

TBZ SG lOOL 111,THE'URBAN COMPR3IMSIVETIAN:.

'A Partial Bieliogiaphy

Addition'al copies available from

Council of Planning LibrariansPost OffiCe Box 229 .

Monticello,- Illinois 61856

4'Se_

for $4.00

.1

v