i fast transient simulation of pinceti surge arrester

38
FAST TRANSIENT SIMULATION OF PINCETI SURGE ARRESTER MODEL ON A TRANSMISSION LINE USING ATP SOFTWARE YUSOF BIN MUHAMAD A project report submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of the Degree of the Master of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia JAN 2015

Upload: hoangtu

Post on 28-Jan-2017

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

i

FAST TRANSIENT SIMULATION OF PINCETI SURGE ARRESTER MODEL ON

A TRANSMISSION LINE USING ATP SOFTWARE

YUSOF BIN MUHAMAD

A project report submitted in partial

fulfilment of the requirement for the award of the

Degree of the Master of Electrical Engineering

Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

JAN 2015

v

ABSTRACT

Lightning is one of the main causes of overvoltage on power system. Over voltages

problem at the transmission line can cause flashover voltage at the insulator string,

power system disturbances and transformer failure. To prevent of insulator string and

equipment of the power system from damaging effect by lightning overvoltage, metal

oxide surge arrester is installed at overhead line in parallel with insulator string. Due to

metal oxide surge arrester have dynamic behaviour, this arrester can be simulated using

non-linear resistor. Therefore Pinceti model is proposed to simulate using Alternative

Transient Program (ATP) software. Several procedures have been following to calculate

Pinceti arrester model parameters so that compatible with 132kV overhead transmission

line system. Tested result by simulation is compared with the manufacturer arrester

datasheet to evaluate accuracy of Pinceti model before installed arrester at 132kV

transmission line model. Pinceti model are installed at several locations on the

transmission line model to evaluate the level of effectiveness and capabilities to reduce

the level of overvoltage across insulator string and to ensure lightning overcurrent draws

to ground totally.

vi

ABSTRAK

Kilat merupakan salah satu punca berlakunya masalah voltan lampau dalam sistem

kuasa. Masalah voltan lampau dalam talian penghantaran boleh menyebabkan

berlakunya voltan lampau pada penebat, gangguan dalam sistem kuasa dan kebakaran

pada alatubah. Untuk mencegah dari berlakunya kerosakan pada penebat dan alatan

dalam sistem kuasa kesan dari voltan lampau kilat ini, penangkap kilat jenis metal oxide

dipasang pada talian penghantaran secara selari dengan penebat. Disebabkan penangkap

kilat jenis metal oxide ini mempunyai ciri-ciri dinamik, penangkap kilat ini boleh

disimulasikan dengan meggunakan perintang bukan linear. Oleh itu, model penangkap

kilat Pinceti dicadangkan untuk disimulasikan dengan menggunakan perisian Alternative

Transient Program (ATP). Beberapa prosedur harus diikut untuk mengira parameter-

parameter pada model Pinceti supaya bersesuaian dengan talian penghantaran 132kV.

Hasil ujikaji dengan menggunakan simulasi dibandingkan dengan data penangkap kilat

yang diperolehi dari pembuat penangkap kilat sebenar bagi menilai ketepatan model

Pinceti sebelum ia dipasang pada model talian penghantaran 132kV. Model Pinceti

dipasang pada beberapa lokasi talian penghantaran untuk menilai keberkesanan dan

keupayaan bagi mengurangkan aras voltan lampau kilat pada penebat dan untuk

memastikan arus lampau kilat dapat mengalir ke bumi secara keseluruhannya.

vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE i

DECLARATION ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENT iv

ABSTRACT v

ABSTRAK vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS vii

LIST OF TABLES ix

LIST OF FIGURES xi

LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS xiv

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Problem statement 2

1.3 Objectives 5

1.4 Project scopes 5

1.5 Outline of dissertation 6

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7

2.1 Introduction of lightning 7

2.2 Fundamental of surge arrester 9

2.3 I-V characteristics 11

2.4 Types of surge arrester model 12

2.5 Transmission line tower 15

2.6 Lightning source 19

CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 20

3.1 Introduction 20

viii

3.2 Study Alternative Transient Program (ATP) software 21

3.3 Study lightning source parameter 24

3.4 Study about Pinceti surge arrester model parameter 27

3.5 Study transmission line system model 32

3.6 Save ATP Program 39

3.7 Run ATP program 40

CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 42

4.1. Introduction 42

4.2 Pinceti model testing 43

4.3 Install Pinceti model at transmission line 47

4.4 Discussion of the current draws to ground 60

CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATION 64

5.1 Conclusion 64

5.2 Recommendations 65

REFERENCES 66

ix

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1 Pinceti Model parameter for 20kV rating 28

Table 3.2 V-I characteristics for non-linear A0 and A1 for

V8/20µs =46.2kV 29

Table 3.3 IEC suggested for TLA rating 29

Table 3.4 ABB EXLIM P datasheet 30

Table 3.5 Pinceti Model Parameter for 120kV rating 31

Table 3.6 V-I characteristics for non-linear A0 and A1 for

V8/20µs =276kV 31

Table 3.7 Cable specification 37

Table 4.2 Calculated Residual Voltages for the ABB MWA

16kV arrester 43

Table 4.3 Voltage injected versus residual current for the

ABB MWA 16kV arrester 44

Table 4.4 Calculated residual voltages for the EXLIM P

132kV arrester 45

Table 4.5 Votage injected versus residual current for the

ABB EXLIM 120-kV arrester 45

Table 4.6 Insulator string voltage without MOV and with

MOV (left pole) 48

Table 4.7 Residual voltage and current flow to the

ground (left pole) 49

Table 4.8 Residual Voltage Without MOV and with

MOV (right pole) 55

x

Table 4.9 Residual voltage and current flow to the

ground (right pole) 55

Table 4.10 Current flow to round for each tower 60

xi

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1 Damage of transformer at TNB substation due to

lightning strike 1

Figure 1.2 No of day with lightning strike in Malaysia 3

Figure 1.3 Lightning surge arrester 5

Figure 2.1 Cloud to ground downward negative lightning 8

Figure 2.2 Porcelain housing metal oxide surge arrester 10

Figure 2.3 V-I characteristics of MO arrester 336kV 11

Figure 2.4 Pinceti Model 12

Figure 2.5 IEEE Model 13

Figure 2.6 Fernandez Model 14

Figure 2.7 132kV multi-storey transmission line 16

Figure 2.8 Insulator string 18

Figure 2.9 Time duration of a typical lightning surge 19

Figure 3.1 Main window 23

Figure 3.2 Plotting program in ATP 24

Figure 3.3 Circuit that has been used to define the parameter

of the surge model 25

Figure 3.4 Dialog box of the Hidler Type surge model 25

Figure 3.5 8/20 µs lightning waveshape 26

Figure 3.6 V-I characteristics for non-linear A0 and A1 28

Figure 3.7 Conductor phase of impedance wave 33

Figure 3.8 Shield wire of impedance wave 34

Figure 3.9 Tower surge impedance wave 35

Figure 3.10 Insulator string 35

xii

Figure 3.11 Cable data 36

Figure 3.12 AC source 132kVL-L 38

Figure 3.13 AC source 38

Figure 3.14 VL-L probe connection 39

Figure 3.15 Save ATP program 39

Figure 3.16 Writing file name 40

Figure 3.17 ATP run 40

Figure 3.18 Select file 41

Figure 3.19 Voltage probe name 41

Figure 4.1 Residual current testing model 43

Figure 4.2 Graph Voltage Inject Versus Residual Current

for 20kA rating 44

Figure 4.3 Graph voltage inject versus residual current 46

Figure 4.4 Surge at tower (back flashover) 47

Figure 4.5 Location of tower 47

Figure 4.6 Left pole upper phase (without Pinceti) 49

Figure 4.7 Left pole upper phase (with Pinceti) 50

Figure 4.8 Left Pole Medium Phase (without Pinceti) 50

Figure 4.9 Left Pole Middle Phase (with Pinceti) 51

Figure 4.10 Left Pole Lower Phase (without Pinceti) 51

Figure 4.11 Left Pole Lower Phase (with Pinceti) 52

Figure 4.12 Graph residual Voltage Versus Tower

(Left Pole Upper Phase) 52

Figure 4.13 Graph residual Voltage Versus Tower

(Left Pole Middle Phase) 53

Figure 4.14 Graph residual Voltage Versus Tower

(Left Pole Lower Phase) 54

Figure 4.15 Right pole upper phase (without MOV) 56

Figure 4.16 Right pole upper phase (with MOV) 56

Figure 4.17 Right pole middle phase (without MOV) 57

Figure 4.18 Right pole middle phase (with MOV) 57

xiii

Figure 4.19 Right pole lower phase (without MOV) 58

Figure 4.20 Right Pole Lower Phase (with MOV) 58

Figure 4.21 Graph residual Voltage Versus Tower

(Right Pole Upper Phase) 59

Figure 4.22 Graph residual voltage versus tower

(Right Pole Middle Phase) 59

Figure 4.23 Graph residual Voltage Versus Tower

(Right Pole Lower Phase) 60

Figure 4.24 Balance lightning current to ground 61

Figure 4.25 Current flow in transmission line 62

Figure 4.26 Current flow in transmission line when lightning 62

xiv

LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS

MOV - Metal Oxide Varistor

ZnO - Zinc Oxide

SiC - Silicone Carbaid

ATP - Alternative Transient Program

MCOV - Maximum Continuous Operating Voltage

TLA - Transmission Line Surge Arrester

CFO - Critical flashover voltage

IEC - International Electrotechnical Commission

IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

AAAC - All Aluminium Alloy Conductor

ACSR - Aluminium Conductor Steel Reinforced

TNB - Tenaga Nasional Berhad

AC - Alternating Current

I-V - Current – Voltage

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

Lightning is one of the main causes of the outages on power networks. The lightning

surge can produce dangerous overvoltage, causing power supply interruptions that result

in costly damage to equipment and also imposing an extra cost to the power utility

because of the undelivered energy such in Figure 1.1. The amount of energy contained

in a lightning stroke is very high and it can be extremely destructive, even a single stroke

to a distribution line can be sufficient to cause a blackout through a feeder.

Figure 1.1: Damage of transformer at TNB substation due to lightning strike

Generally lightning strikes mostly the top of a transmission tower (shied-wire)

rather than the phase conductor. When lightning current hits the top of a transmission

tower, it flows to the bottom of the tower and out onto ground. If the voltage equals or

2

exceeds the line critical flashover voltage (CFO), flashover will occur across insulator

string. This flashover issues are important for evaluating of lightning performance.

Therefore, in order to increase the reliability and availability of the power system, the

lightning-related outages rates must be reduced.

Nowadays, transmission line surge arresters (TLAs) are vital elements to protect

the power systems against the lightning surges by absorbing the energy of surges and

limiting their resultant overvoltage below a certain value which is basic impulse

insulation level [1]. TLA able to reduce lightning initiated flashovers, maintain high

power quality and to avoid damages and disturbances especially in areas with high soil

resistivity and lightning ground flash density [2]. TLA is connected in parallel with them

at selected towers. A computer program is used to determine the optimum number of

locations and to calculate the arrester stresses at each of the chosen locations. Surge

arrester as a robust and efficient alternative, could be located at line ends and along the

line at selected points.

In Malaysia, lightning overvoltage is concern more for 132kV/275kV

transmission line system. Many observations have been done to evaluate about this

problem experimentally and by software modelling. One of the famous tools for

modelling 132kV transmission line system is by using Alternative Transient Program

(ATP) software. This software is most useful for modelling transmission line model and

the most famous model design by using this software is multi-storey tower model.

1.2 Problem statement

Electrical power systems have three main parts that transform other types of energy into

electrical energy and transmit this energy to consumer. The three main components are

generation, transmission and distribution system. However, transmission line have the

longest distance compare with generation and distribution system. So transmission line

most attracted to the lightning strike due to high structure of transmission line tower.

According to Malaysia Meteorological Services Department, most state of

Malaysia has a number of days with thunderstorm more than 100 per day. Malaysia

ranks one of the countries with highest lightning activities in the world. Refer to Figure

3

1.2; average thunders for Kuala Lumpur are 180-300 per annum. Eighty percent of

lightning discharges current to ground in Malaysia exceed 20kA, potentially

approaching 50-100 million volts. Lightning is classified as a transient event. The

amount of energy contained in a lightning stroke is very high. Lightning can cause

destruction of equipment, damage to substation or power plant equipment.

Figure 1.2: No of day with lightning strike in Malaysia [3]

Lightning faults have two types which are flash over and back flashovers. Flash

over mainly following a screen failure and caused by direct hitting to the phase

conductor. Back flash over which can occur when lightning strike hits tower or the

ground wire. In this case, the potential at the top of the tower rises in an important way

and can exceed the dielectric strength of the insulator string. Therefore, it is very

important to propose some idea for improve the lightning protection scheme in electrical

power system. This can be done by proposed a new surge arrester [4].

Transmission line surge arresters are installed in an overhead line in parallel to an

insulator string to prevent flashover at the insulator string. Line arresters are preferably

installed where frequent backlash over occur due to missing or inadequate overhead

ground or shield wire protection and or high tower footing impedances. In order to

improve the supply quality of an already existing transmission or distribution line,

installing line arrester on all or only on same of the tower poles is in many cases a cost

saving alternative to improving the shielding of the line or the grounding or towers or

poles [5].

4

However for the economical factor, not all transmission line towers are installed

with surge arrester. As far as economy and other factors are concerned, the transmission

lines in our country are only installed one or two kilometres lightning conductors in and

out of the substations or power factories. Power supply faults and failure caused by

detour or back lightning striking happen especially in mountain areas [6]. TNB

transmission line department use TFlash Software to determine which tower and which

phase should be installed with Transmission Line surge arrester (TLA).

An accurate surge arrester model will increase the lightning protective level of

the electric power system. Surge arrester installation removes the superfluous charge

from the line. The most common types of surge arrester are open spark gap, Silicon

Carbaid (SiC) arrester with spark gap and metal oxide surge arrester without spark gap.

Mainly Zink Oxide under metal oxide category is today most common used [4].

Metal oxide arresters are extensively used in power systems due to their good

performance in over-voltage protection. Appropriate modelling of their dynamic

characteristics is very important for arrester location and insulation coordination studies.

For switching surge studies, the MOAs can be represented simply with their nonlinear –

characteristics. However, such a practice will not be appropriate for lightning surge

studies because the MOA exhibits dynamic characteristics such that the voltage across

the arrester increases as the time-to-crest of the arrester current decreases and the

arrester voltage reaches a peak before the arrester current peaks [7].

5

Figure 1.3: Lightning surge arrester

1.3 Objectives

The purpose of the research is to accomplish three objectives as follow:-

a) To develop 132kV high voltage transmission line system using ATP software.

b) To use Pinceti surge arrester model in ATP software.

c) To evaluate the effectiveness of the Pinceti surge arrester model.

1.4 Project scopes

As the research a boundary, several limitations has describes as follow:-

1. This project only concern on Pinceti surge arrester lightning protection model

performance.

2. Develop the 132kV overhead transmission line double circuit Bergeron model.

3. Develop the 10kA lightning current impulse 8/20µs wave shape and strike only at

top of fourth tower out of seven tower

6

4. Pinceti model surge arrester are installed at third, fourth and fifth tower

5. Study only metal oxide surge arrester type only.

1.5 Outline of dissertation

This thesis is dividing into five chapters. Basically, some theory and literature review,

introduction, methodology, simulation result, comparison of result, analysis and

discussion and conclusion were included in these five chapters.

Chapter 1 summarizes project background and elaborates on project objectives, scope

and problem statement.

Chapter 2 explains a few literature reviews about surge arrester, description of lightning

strike phenomenon and parameter of transmission line tower.

Chapter 3 describes the methodology of project development. This chapter also will

explain detail about ATP software, 132kV transmission line tower model parameter,

overvoltage cable, Pinceti surge arrester model parameter and AC voltage source.

Chapter 4 shows about the result and discussion of simulation to evaluate effectiveness

of Pinceti model surge arrester when installed at transmission line after 10kA lightning

surge strikes at transmission line tower. This chapter divided to three phases. First phase

is to shows the result of testing the effectiveness of Pinceti arrester itself. Second phase

is shows the measurement result for the value of voltage and current when lightning

strike to tower without Pinceti arrester and for the last phase is to shows the

measurement result for the value of voltage and current at transmission line with Pinceti

arrester installed parallel with insulator string. All result for those three phases are

discussed briefly in this chapter.

Chapter 5 elaborates generally about the conclusion and recommendation for this master

project overall.

7

CHAPTER 2

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Introduction of lightning

Lightning is the most frequent cause of overvoltage and is classified as a transient

overvoltage event. This is because lightning strikes a power line, it is like closing a big

switch between a large current source and the power line circuit and cause abrupt change

in the circuit conditions creating transient problem. Lightning spark resulting from the

development of millions of volts between clouds or between a cloud and the earth. It is

similar to the dielectric breakdown of a huge capacitor [1]. The voltage of a lightning

stroke may start at hundreds of millions of volts between the cloud and earth. The study

of lightning strokes in power lines is very important because typically, the highest

structures located in high incidence lightning regions. Any structure, no matter its size,

may be struck by lightning, but the probability of a structure been struck increases with

its height [8]. Most lightning strikes terminate on shield wire rather than on phase wire.

Basically, there are four types of lightning, which are cloud-to-ground downward

positive, cloud-to-ground downward negative, ground-to-cloud upward positive and

ground-to-cloud upward negative as shown in Figure 2.1 respectively. However, only

cloud-to-ground lightning has been studied widely due to human and power system

safety.

8

.

Figure 2. 1: Cloud to ground downward negative lightning [8]

Lightning occurs when clouds acquire electrical charge. Electric field is considered have

strength are created within the cloud and between cloud and earth. When the field

become excessive, the dielectric of huge capacitor cannot longer support electrical stress

and then lightning flash occurs. According to Martin A. Uman and Rocov (2001), about

90% of cloud-to-ground lightning is downward moving negative charged leader while

only 10% of the cloud-to ground lightning is downward moving positive leader. Cloud

to ground flashes are composed of a single stroke or a multiple number of component

strokes. Multiple stroke flashes have 3 to 4 strokes. Lightning flash between lightning

head and earth conductor resulting travelling-wave comes down the tower and acts

through its effective impedance, raising potential of tower top to a point where

difference in voltage across insulation is sufficient to cause flashover from tower back to

conductor. Travelling wave occurs when lightning strikes a transmission line span and a

high current surge is injected on to the conductor phase. The impulse voltage and current

waves divide and propagate in both directions from the stroke terminal at a velocity of

approximately 300 meters per microsecond with magnitudes determined by the stroke

current and line surge impedance. This strike type is called back flashover (J. Rohan

Lucas, 2001). Back flashover occurs when lightning strike terminates at overhead

ground wire or tower. Back flashover occurs across insulator string if the voltage equal

or exceed the line’s critical flashover voltage (CFO) (Andrew R. Hileman, 1999). Back

flashover is most prevalent when tower footing impedance is high.

9

2.2 Fundamental of surge arrester

Generally, the use of line arrester is to decrease or eliminate lightning flashover on

transmission and distribution lines. The purpose of line arrester installation in

transmission line system is to improve the performance of overhead lines with poor

shielding or with very high tower footing impedance. Arresters avoid lightning

flashovers since transmission lines insulation voltage is higher than the residual voltage

developed across the arresters, either due to back flashover or shielding failure [9]. The

lightning arrester is a non-linear device that acts as an open circuit to low potentials, but

conducts electrical current at very high potentials. When lightning strikes a line

protected with a lightning arrester, the non-linear resistance draws the current to ground.

Surge arresters are the primary protection against atmospheric. There are generally

connected parallel with the equipment to be protected to divert the surge current. One of

the most common lightning arresters is the MOV (Metal Oxide Varistor). The MOV has

a piece of metal oxide that is joined to the power and grounding line by a pair of

semiconductors. The semiconductors have a variable resistance dependent on voltage.

When the voltage level in the power line is at the rated voltage for the arrester, the

electrons in the semiconductors flow in a way that creates a very high resistance. If the

voltage level in the power line exceeds the arrester rated voltage, the electrons behave

differently and create a low resistance path that conducts the injected lightning current to

the ground system [10]. During lightning overvoltage, surge arrester plays an important

role in limiting voltage levels and protecting power system components. Surge arresters

used for protection of exterior electrical distribution lines will be either of the Metal-

Oxide Surge Arrester (MOSA), with resistors made of zinc-oxide (ZnO) blocks, or

gapped type with resistors made of Silicon-Carbide (SiC). Silicon carbide arresters are

developed in power systems to protect the equipment from lightning over voltages. But

this kind of surge arresters has some advantages, such as negligible power losses, low

level reliability and low speed response to the over-voltages. So, silicon carbide arresters

are replaced by metal oxide surge arresters.

10

2.2.1 Metal Oxide Surge arrester (Zine oxide)

The substitution of silicon carbide arresters with zine oxide surge arresters has brought

benefits to overvoltage protection such as higher energy absorption capacity coupled

with most simultaneous action by parallel arresters in the same line branch. Metal Oxide

is a ceramal of zinc oxide with admixtures of other metal oxides such as bismuth, cobalt,

manganese and aluminium. Metal-oxide (MO) surge arrester is very important

protection device in power systems and widely used as protective devices against

switching and lightning over-voltages in power systems [11]. Since there are no series

gaps in metal-oxide surge arresters, the arresters continuously withstand the operating

voltage applied. In order to improve performance and maximize applications of metal-

oxide surge arresters, polymer housings have been used to replace porcelain housings.

[11].

Figure 2.2: Porcelain housing metal oxide surge arrester [12]

11

Figure 2.2 shows the porcelain housing TLA containing a single column of ZnO

blocks, all individually extensively routine-tested during manufacture, dispersed with the

necessary spacers as determined by the electrical design for the arrester. Longer arresters

often require external grading or sealing ring to maintain a uniform and acceptable

voltage stress along their length. Operation of such arrester without this grading ring

therefore may lead to failure and invalidates our guarantees/warranties.

2.3 V-I characteristics

Figure 2.3:V-I characteristics of MO arrester 336kV [12]

Figure 2.3 shows the V-I characteristics of MOV arrester. The distinctive features of the

MO arresters are their extremely non-linear voltage-current or V-I characteristic,

ignorable power losses, high level reliability in the operation time, high speed response

to the overvoltage, simplicity of design, easier for maintenance and long life time.

Accurate modelling and simulation of their dynamic characteristics are very important

for arrester allocation, systems reliability and insulation coordination studies. For

switching over voltages studies, the surge arresters can be represented by their nonlinear

V-I characteristics. Metal oxide surge arresters have frequency depended properties such

as time-to-crest of the arrester current effect on residual voltage of arresters. Because of

these dynamic behaviours, surge arrester nowadays in power systems software is very

12

difficult. These V-I characteristics consist of three condition regions which are low

voltage, rated voltage and overvoltage. For the low voltage operation, MOV is not

function and leakage current about µs also draws to the ground. For the rated voltage

condition, nonlinear MOV be a high resistance and current cannot flow to the ground

and for the voltage applied to the MOV exceed from the their rating, non-linear

resistance become low resistance and current can flow to the ground [12].

2.4 Types of surge arrester model

There are various surge arrester model were proposed nowadays such as IEEE, Pinceti,

Fernandez, Schmith, Tominaga, Kim, Mardira, Popov and CIGRE model. However the

most three popular model that always used for study about surge arrester nowadays as

follows.

2.4.1 Pinceti model

Figure 2.4:Pinceti Model [13]

This model has been proposed by Pinceti and Gianettoni as in Figure 2.4 [13]. This

model is based on IEEE model such in Figure 2.5 with some minor different. All

13

necessary data are easily collected in datasheets, there is no need for an iterative

correction of the parameters, and the model’s performance is accurate. The capacitance

is eliminated, since its effect on model behaviour is negligible and only electrical

parameters are used. The two parallel resistances are substituted for only resistance, R

about 1MΩ replaced between the input terminals only to avoid numerical oscillations

and nonlinear resistors A0 and A1 can be estimated by using the V-I characteristics

curves that suggested by IEEE working group 3.4.11. The two non-linear resistances A0

and A1 are separated by a L1. Thus A0 and A1 are essentially in parallel and

characterize the static behaviour of the Metal Oxide Surge Arrester (MOSA). For fast

rising surge currents, the impedance of the filter becomes more significant, indeed the

inductance L1 derives more current into the non-linear branch A0. Since A0 has a higher

voltage for a given current than A1, the model generates a higher voltage between its

input terminals. The important point is the criteria for choosing of the value of inductive

parameters [14].

2.4.2 IEEE model

Figure 2.5: IEEE Model [10]

IEEE group proposed this model includes the nonlinear resistors, designated by A0 and

A1 separated by RL low pass filter where their parameters are calculated from the

14

estimated height of the arrester. For slow front surges, the R-L filter has very little

impedance and the two non-linear sections of the model are essentially in parallel. For

fast front surges, the impedance of the R-L filter becomes more significant and causes a

current distributed between the two branches. This results in more current in the

nonlinear section designated by A0, than in the section designated by A1. Since

characteristic A0 has a higher voltage for a given current than A1, the result is that the

arrester model generates a higher voltage due to high frequency current are forced by L1

inductance to flow more in the A0 resistance than in the A1 resistance. This model

yields good results for arrester discharge voltages, when the discharge current has a time

to crest within the range of 0.5 to 45μs. The major problem associated to it is to calculate

its parameters. The IEEE Working Group suggests an iterative method, where

adjustments are necessary to achieve better results. The initial parameters can be

obtained through formulas that take into account both the electrical data (residual

voltages), and the physical parameter (overall height, block diameter, columns number)

[14].

2.4.3 Fernandez-Diaz

Figure 2.6: Fernandez Model [15]

Figure 2.6 shows a model proposed by Fernandez and Diaz. This model has recently

been developed which is recommended by IEEE and Pinceti Model. The value of non-

15

linear resistor A0 and A1 are connected in parallel and separated by inductance, L1.

Capacitance, C is the value of terminal to terminal of capacitor and the resistor represent

of arrester which has the value of the whole resist. The capacitance, C represents the

external capacitance associated to the height of the arrester. The inductance L1, has the

most influence on the result and a formula. L1 should be adjusted by a try and error

procedure to match the residual voltages for lightning discharge current published in

manufacturer’s catalogue. The resistor R0 is used to avoid numerical oscillations when

running the model with digital program [15].

2.5 Transmission line tower

Transmission line system is one of the important things to be modelling in order to test

the effectiveness of surge arrester. So, transmission line system consists of right cable

parameter and transmission line tower parameter. The representation of transmission line

can be modelled by using ATP software. This software offers some transmission line

system model such as Bergeron, PI, J. Marti, Noda and Semlyen. The most commonly

used transmission line model in Malaysia is Bergeron model because this model

considers all transmission line tower parameter such as cross-arm, insulator string, tower

surge impedance and footing resistance. This model basically is based on distributed

LC-parameter travelling wave line model with lumped resistance. This time-domain

Bergeron model is commonly used in power system transient fault analysis (Bin Li et al,

APPEEC 2009). Figure 2.7 shows an actual Bergeron model for 132kV transmission

line in Malaysia [9]. This Bergeron transmission line tower model type called double

circuit multi-storeys model. To represent a real transmission line tower, several

parameters should be considered for modelling such as cross arm, insulator string and

tower surge impedance. Bergeron Model accurately represents only fundamental

frequency (50Hz). There for the surge impedance is constant.

One of the more well-known models is the multistory model designed by Masaru

Ishii (M. Ishii et al., IEEE, 1991). A multistory tower model basically is composed of

distributed parameter lines with parallel RL circuits and has been recommended by the

16

Japanese Guideline of insulation design/coordination against lightning (Takamitsu Ito et

al., IEEE, 2003). This model is widely used for lightning surge analysis in Malaysia.

Figure 2.7:132kV multi-storey transmission line [9]

17

2.5.1 Cross arm

Cross-arms are used as transmission-line supports for 132kV and 275kV tower. In ATP

software, transmission line cross arm are represented by distributed constant line

branched at junction point. Their surge impedance given by:

𝑍𝐴𝐾 = 60 ln(2ℎ/𝑟𝐴) (2.1)

Where h is cross-arm height (m)

rA is cross-arm radius (m2)

2.5.2 Tower surge impedance

Calculation for tower surge impedance parameter of both shield wire and phase

conductor for cylindrical tower is approximated by:

𝑍 = 60 ln(√2 (2ℎ

𝑟) − 1) (2.2)

Where h is tower height (m)

rA is tower radius (m2)

2.5.3 Tower footing resistance

Tower footing resistance play important role because more lower the value of tower

footing resistance, the easier lightning discharge current flow to ground. A footing

resistance model incorporating soil ionization effect can be approximated as follow:

RT =𝑅0

√1+(𝐼

𝐼𝑔) (2.3)

Where R0 is footing resistance at low current and low frequency

I is strike current through resistance

18

Ig is limiting current to initiate sufficient soil ionization

Ig= 𝐸0𝜌

2𝜋𝑅02 (2.4)

Where 𝜌 is soil resistivity (Ωm)

E0 is soil ionization gradient (400Kv/m)

2.5.4 Insulator string

The insulator is modelled as a stray capacitor connected in parallel with a voltage

controlled switch as shown in Figure 2.8. The string which consists of glass insulators,

provides an equivalent capacitance used in the model. Insulator supports the conductor

by providing mechanical support that depends on its normal operating and transient

voltage.

Figure 2.8: Insulator string [9]

19

2.6 Lightning source

Lightning impulse current of large magnitudes will strike a tower top or overhead

ground wire causing back flashover across insulator string. The type of current shape

used for this model is 8/20µs 10kA. Figure 2.9 shows the typical lightning surge. The

duration of the lightning stroke is usually less than a couple of hundred microsecond.

The industry accepted 8 x 20 current wave shown in figure as a reasonable

approximation of a lightning surge.

Figure 2.9: Time duration of a typical lightning surge [1]

Current

Time

20

CHAPTER 3

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

This chapter defines the necessary step to complete this project. This chapter describes

start study of lightning characteristics, surge arrester models, transmission line cable

data and ATP software. The steps diagram describes related activities to be done in each

stage so ensure this project could be finished properly and successfully as planning.

Below is the step of project methodology.

a) Study characteristics of lightning phenomenon

Preliminary studies about lightning have done on the previous chapter to know more

about lightning characteristics. The source of information such as IEEE journal and

paper, thesis and trusted web from internet.

b) Surge arrester study

The next step is study about surge arrester model such as IEEE, Schmidt, Fernandez

and Haddad. These models have related information with Pincetti model. When got

the right Pinceti parameter, the modelling arrester can be done using ATP software

easily.

c) Transmission line study

For this project 132kV transmission line system is chosen. This study modelled 7

transmission lines and is connected through 132kV overhead transmission line cable.

Cable data was used from cable datasheet that recognized by Tenaga Nasional

Berhad (TNB). The full transmission line parameter model calculated using certain

21

formula included shield wire, phase conductor, insulator string, cross-arm, tower

surge impedance, tower footing resistance. For this step, more calculation did to get

the transmission line parameter.

d) Study ATP software

Next study ATP software mean transfer all transmission line and Pinceti surge

arrester model parameter to ATP software. Before arrester model is installed to

transmission line tower, testing did to single arrester model first to ensure the

arrester will function properly. Heidler lightning surge model was used to represent

for real lightning surge.

e) Observe voltage at transmission line tower

For the last step, some comparisons did on voltage value such as between installed

surge arrester and without arrester. Arrester will install between phase conductor and

ground. The result will be analyzed at this step.

3.2 Study Alternative Transient Program (ATP) software

3.2.1 Introduction

The software used for modelling of the overhead transmission line system as ATP. ATP

is considered the most widely used for system transient simulation. It can simulate

overvoltage problem such lightning phenomena and switching problem occurring in

electric power. It has been continuously developed through international contributions.

3.2.2 Operating principle of ATP

The ATP program calculates variables of interest within electric power systems as

functions of time, typically started by some disturbances. Fundamentally, the trapezoidal

rule of integration is used to solve the differential equations of system components in the

time domain. ATP has many models including rotating machines, transformers, surge

arresters, transmission lines and cables. With this digital program, complex networks of

22

arbitrary structure can be simulated. Analysis of control systems, power electronics

equipment and components with nonlinear characteristics such as arcs and corona are

also possible. Symmetric or unsymmetrical disturbances are allowed, such as faults,

lightning surges, or any kind of switching operations including commutation of valves.

Calculation of the frequency response of phase networks is also supported [16].

For this study purpose, ATP software version 1.0 is used because this software is

more user friendly compare with other software because the user can build a graphical

picture of an electric circuit by selecting components from menus. ATP software has

two parts which are ATP Draw and ATP Plot. ATP draw supports about 70 standard

components. ATPDraw is most valuable to new users of ATP and is an excellent tool for

educational purposes. The possibility of building up libraries of circuits and sub-circuits

makes ATPDraw a powerful tool in transient’s analysis of electric power systems [16].

ATP plotXY used to display output such waveform of voltage, current and lightning

strike. Some of the typical applications of ATP software are:

a) Lightning overvoltage studies

b) Transmission lines and cable with distributed and frequency-dependent parameter

c) Elements with nonlinearities: transformers including saturation and hysteresis

arrester

d) Ordinary switches, time-dependent switches, statistical switches.

e) Switching transient and fault studies

f) Statistical and systematic overvoltage studies

g) Transient stability and motor start-up

The following supporting routines are available in ATP:

Line constant, cable constant and cable parameter for calculation of electrical

parameters of overhead lines and cables.

Generation of frequency-dependent line model input data: JMARTI setup,

BEGERON setup, SEMLYEN setup and NODA setup.

Calculation of model data transformer (XFORMER and BCTRAN)

23

ATPDraw supports most of the frequently used components in ATP. The components as

Figure 2.10 are single phase as long as nothing else is specified.

Figure 3.1: Main window

3.2.3 Plotting on ATP

ATP is interfaced with these post-processors by the disk files. Their main function is to

display simulation results in time-domain or frequency-domain. Data from ATP

simulation are stored in a file having extension.pl4. Processing can be off-line or on-line.

The latter display results while simulation is proceeding and available only if the

operating system provides concurrent PL4-file access for ATP and the post-processor

program.

24

Figure 3.2: Plotting program in ATP

In ATP, two most widely-used plotting programs are PLOTXY and GTPPLOT. PlotXY

is a WIN32 plotting program originally designed for ATP-EMTP software. It is mainly

designed to make, as easy and fast as possible for line plots in Microsoft Windows

environments. It can post-process plotted curves; algebraic operation, computation of

Fourier series coefficients, etc. It has an easy-to-use graphical user interface, and its 32-

bit code provides very fast operation. Up to 3 PL4 or ADF files can be simultaneously

held in memory for easy comparison of various data, and up to 8 curves per plots versus

time or X-Y plots are allowed. It has automatic axis-scaling, can plot with two

independent vertical axes, and provides easy tools for factors, offsets, and zoom support,

and a graphical cursor to see values in numerical format. It also can export screen plots

as Windows Metafile via win32 clipboard. Figures 3.3 and 3.4 below are examples for

plotting via PLOTXY [16].

3.3 Study lightning source parameter

To design surge arrester, the characteristics of lightning should study first. This because,

the surge arrester designed will be accurate and can be lightning stroke protection. For

this analysis purpose, the lightning current impuls of 8/20µs waveshape is chosen

according to recommended waveform by IEEE. The Heidler Type was being used in this

analysis regarding to its simple data in order to determine the front time and duration of

66

REFERENCES

[1] Abdulwadood, "Design Of Lightning Arresters For Electrical Power System

Protection," Power Engineering And Electrical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 433-

442, 2013.

[2] S. B. e. al, "Analysis Of Lightning Protection With Transmission Line Arrester

Using ATP/EMTP: Case On HV 220kV Double Circuit Line," UPEC, pp. 1-6,

2010.

[3] M. M. S. department, "Number Of Days With Thunderstorm In Malaysia".

[4] Meister, "Comparison Of Metal Oxide Surge Arrester Models In Overvoltage

Studies," International Journal Of Engineering, Science And Technology, vol. 3,

no. 11, pp. 35-45, 2011.

[5] Munukutla, "A Practical Evaluation Of Surge Arrester Placement," IEEE

Transactions On Power Delivery, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1742-1748, 2010.

[6] Hailiang, "Automatic Simulation Of Transmission Line Backflashover Rate Base

On ATP," pp. 1211-1215, 2008.

[7] S. B. a. al, "A Parameter Identification Technique For Metal-Oxide Surge Arrester

Models," IEEE Transactions On Power Delivery, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 736-741, 2002.

[8] Shariatinasab, "Probabilistic Evaluation Of Failure Risk Of Transmission Line

Surge Arresters Caused By Lightning Flash," IET Generation, Transmission &

67

Distribution, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 193-203, 2013.

[9] N. H. A. h. e. al, "Analysis Of Arrester Energy For 132kv Overhead Transmission

Line Due To Back Flashover And Sheilding Failure," in IEEE International

Conference On Power And Energy, Kota Kinabalu Sabah, malaysia, 2012.

[10] I. W. G. 3.4.11, "Modeling Of Metal Oxide Surge Arresters," Transactions On

Power Delivery, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 302-309, 1992.

[11] Jinliang, "Potential Distribution Analysis Of Suspended-Type Metal-Oxide Surge

Arresters," IEEE Transactions On Power Delivery, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1214-1220,

2003.

[12] V. Hinrichsen, "Metal-Oxide Surge Arrester Fundamental," Siemens AG Power

Transmission And Distribution High Voltage Division, Berlin, Germany, 2001.

[13] P. Pinceti, "A Simplified Model For Zinc Oxide Surge Arresters," IEEE

Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 393-398, 1999.

[14] I. W. G. 3.4.11, "Modeling Of Metal Oxide Surge Arresters," Transactions on

Power Delivery, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 302-309, 1992.

[15] Fernandez, "Metal-Oxide Surge Arrester Model For Fast Transient Simulations".

[16] L. P. e. al, Atpdraw For Windows User Manual, Norway: SINTEF Energy

Research, 1998.

[17] "Modeling Overhead Transmission Lines For Lines Arrester Study," J.A. Martinez

et al.

[18] J. J. Woodworth, "Selecting Arrester MCOV And Uc Of Arrester Selection Guide,"

Arrester Work, 2009.

[19] Southern Cable Sdn Bhd, "Transmission Line Conductor," Tenaga Nasional Berhad

68

Research, 2011.

[20] C. A. C. e. al, "Simulation Of Metal Oxide Surge Arresters Behaviour," IEEE,

National Technical University of Athens, Greece, 2008.

[21] ABB Surge Arrester, "High Voltage Surge Arresters Buyer's Guide," ABB AB

High Voltage Products Surge Arresters, Ludvika, Sweden, 2014.