citizens

Hypothesis political action of the Group

Group on AiresisMember of the group

political initiative

elected representatives

institutional Organizations

• Is hypothesized the development of a political group independently, without a control system external.

• Political action should materialize by the political representatives of reference, placed in institutional bodies (city councils, provincial councils, regional councils, parliament), or settle for an action for the promotion of ideas and themes that educate and convince the electorate and / or their representatives.

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Structure of a Group

group

proposals

Blog & forum

citizens

general public

general private

Areas reserved Thematic

Areas reserved

Management

anonymous

registered

sympathizers

members

experienced members

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Structure of a Group

group

proposals

Blog & forum

citizens

general public

general private

Areas reserved Thematic

Areas reserved

Management

anonymous

registered

sympathizers

members

experienced members

The diagram shows the proposed structure of a

group and possible relationships with users

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Structure of a Group

group

proposals

Blog & forum

citizens

general public

general private

Areas reserved Thematic

Areas reserved

Management

anonymous

registered

sympathizers

members

experienced members

The group may be structured in different areas, accessible to users so selectively and progressive, depending on

the level of involvement in the Group

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Structure of a Group

group

proposals

Blog & forum

citizens

general public

general private

Areas reserved Thematic

Areas reserved

Management

anonymous

registered

sympathizers

members

experienced members

The areas could be split even for functions /

themes in a reasonable number on the size of the

group.

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Settings area for the proposed structure "free"

group

proposals

citizens

general

general private

Areas reserved Thematic

Areas reserved

Management

sympathizers

Member

experts

Anonymous and registered users

The editors of the proposals can individually choose which options apply to the same:✔ anonymity temporary✔ Make proposals externally visible✔ Vote secret / open vote

Settings of "proposals" Group:Users can change the advanced settings = YES

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Settings area for the proposed structure "closed"

group

proposals

citizens

General only private Areas reserved Thematic

Areas reserved

Management

sympathizers

Member

experts

All proposals will be "private", only visible to members of the Group, other options are predefined, common to all

Settings of "proposals" Group:anonymity temporary = yes or noProposals visible outside = NOVote secret = yes or noUsers can change the advanced settings = NO

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Settings for the area proposals "open"

group

proposals

citizens

General only public Areas reserved Thematic

Areas reserved

Management

sympathizers

Member

experts

Anonymous and registered users

All proposals will be in the general area "public", visible to visitors not belonging to the Group, other options are predefined, common to all.

Settings of "proposals" Group:anonymity temporary = yes or noProposals visible outside = YESVote secret = yes or noUsers can change the advanced settings = NO

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Restricted areas / work areasThe Group may provide one or more sub-groups reserved, managed by its access permissions and activities.

The purpose of these sub-groups are:– make space available for proposals that require special privacy;

– designated areas to create committees / working groups, restricted to the "experts".

Below are listed some typical examples.● Management areas:

– internal organization

– Management Events / meetings

● Commissions / Thematic Working Groups– Theme by category (health, education, budget control, legal control ...)– Group Communications– Financial Administration Group

– Legal Assistance Group

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

User access management and certification

Access to the Group (as a sympathizer or member) is possible only with the permission of members who hold the rights of acceptance.

It proposes a system of certification of identity manual, which serves to give concreteness to users. Obviously, it requires work and responsibility on the part of the managers of the Group.

Steps:● Step 1: the user formally applies to join the group● Step 2: a manager ("bureaucrat") evaluates the conditions for membership,

based on the Group's policy● Step 3: a manager (“bureaucrat”) checks that the account to the physical

person who has applied for membership● Step 4: if the identity match, the user is certified and can access the group● Step 5: a manager (“bureaucrat”) keep register of users and their roles

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Structure and types of users

Users can be differentiated into four basic types, depending on their involvement in the Group:➢anonymous – Visitor not logged in Airesis, wants to browse Group activities;➢registered – Airesis registered user, but not a member of the Group, he wants to know the activities of the Group;➢sympathizer – member of the group that sympathizes with it and wants to participate in the activities occasionally;➢Full Members – member of the group that spends time and resources to support;➢expert member – group member with special skills or roles.

Access permissions can be customized with specific settings for each group, an option made available by Airesis.

anonymous

user Airesis

group

Full Members

experts

sympathizer

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Anonymous UserVisitor not logged in Airesis, wants to browse Group activities.

● requirements:– No one (not even logging in Airesis)

● Permissions to the Group:– Blog & forum public:

● Read the post● Can not comment on posts

– Forum private:● inaccessibile

– General proposals public:● Reads the proposals;● Can not insert, comment, vote, see the voting results;

– General proposals private:● inaccessibile

– Proposals in restricted areas:● inaccessibile

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Registered UserAiresis registered user, but not a member of the Group, he wants to know the activities of the Group.

● requirements:– No one

● Permissions to the Group:– Blog:

● Read and commented on the blog post

– Forum public:● read, but would not comment on posts

– Forum private:● inaccessibile

– General proposals public:● Read the proposals;● Unable to submit, comment, vote, but can see the results of voting;

– General proposals private or restricted areas:● inaccessibile

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

sympathizer userMember of the group that sympathizes with it and wants to participate in the activities occasionally.

● requirements:– User with certification of identity– Provides a contact (e-mail)

● Permissions to the Group:– Blog:

● Read and commented on the blog post

– Forum (all):● Reads, commented and adds post

– General proposals (all):● Reads, commented and see the results of the proposed;● Can not vote for them and put them;

– Proposals on restricted areas:● inaccessibile

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Full Membersmember of the group that spends time and resources to support

● requirements:– certified member– financially supports the group (enrollment)

– working in the Group's initiatives (activism)

● Permissions to the Group:– Blog:

● Read and commented on the blog post

– Forum (all):● Reads, commented and adds post

– General proposals (all):● Put, reads, commented, vote and see the results of the proposed;

– Proposals on restricted areas:● Reads, commented, vote and see the results of the proposed;● Can not put them;

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Expert Membergroup member with special skills or roles

● requirements:– certified member

– financially supports the group (enrollment)

– working in the Group's initiatives (activism)

● Permissions to the Group:– Blog:

● Read and commented on the blog post

– Forum (all):● Reads, commented and adds post

– General proposals (all):● Put, reads, commented, vote and see the results of the proposed;

– Proposals on Thematic restricted areas, no specific competence:● Reads, commented, vote and see the results of the proposed;● Can not put them

– Proposals on Thematic restricted areas of specific expertise:● Put, reads, commented, vote and see the results of the proposed;

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Special roles in the Group● Administrator Group:

– Manages the group on the platform (area, quorum, roles, permissions, ...)● Communications expert "Dialer":

– Runs the blog (draw new post)– Indicates meetings, conferences and other events

● Organizer:

– manages the agendas– Manages periods of vote– organizes meetings and internal meetings

● Bureaucrat:

– Supports external proposals behalf of the Group– Verify the identity of sympathizers– records the role of members / supporters (register of certified users)– Manages common documents

In the absence of members of the roles can be combined.

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Setting roles and permissions in Group

no no

no no

no no

no no

no no

no

no no

no

permissionsSympathi-

zermember

expert member

Publish in the Home group dialer

create events dialer organizer

Create periods of vote organizer

Supporting proposals behalf of the Group

Bureaucrat

Add participants in the group Bureaucrat

View the proposed private yes yes yes

Contribute to proposals yes yes yes

Insert new proposals in the group yes yes

View documents yes yes yes

Manage documents Bureaucrat

Vote on proposals yes yes

Blue = see special roles

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Setting roles and permissions in the restricted areas

Area

no

no

no

no

no

no

no no

no

permisionsSympathi-

zermember

expert member

org

an

izati

on View proposals yes yes

Contribute to proposals yes yes

Insert new proposals maybe maybe

Vote on proposals yes yes

them

ati

c

View proposals yes yes

Contribute to proposals yes yes

Insert new proposals maybe

Vote on proposals yes yes

Maybe = the permit depends on the role of "expert" who takes compared to the reserved area / workgroup.

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Setting "quorum" for Proposals

180 d 50% 70% 67% 80%

90 d 20% 50% 40% 67%

60 d 10% 50% 10% 50%

30 d 5% 50% 5% 50%

15 d 10% 50% 10% 50%

Agenda 7 d 0% 50% 0% 50%

3 d 10% 70% 10% 70%

Types of proposal time for debate

quorum of debate quorum of final vote

ratings minimum

Rating / maturity Minimum

minimum voters

required majority

Group's Statute

strategic guidance

Creation of new activity / service

Modify activities / services

Fast amendments

urgent proposal

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

Problems

You should not hide the fact that this proposal / hypothesis has problems, and that these need to be tackled with traditional organizational systems.

The platform offers a set of online solutions, but not solutions to all problems.

● I conclude by listing some obvious problems:– safety problems related to the use of a non-proprietary platform;

– the impossibility of share with other groups in the proposals, if not by groups representing higher geographical levels;

– the absence of mechanisms for transferring / sharing initiatives between the areas of the group;

– the mechanism of user certification requires the same level of activity of the traditional systems (the platform today does not help).

The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.