hydrology, hydrogeology and hydrochemistry of wetlands… · hydrology, hydrogeology and...
TRANSCRIPT
Hydrology, hydrogeologyand hydrochemistry of wetlands:a case study in IzmirBird Paradise, TurkeyA. Melis Somay Æ Sevki Filiz
Abstract Izmir Bird Paradise is one of the mostvaluable wetlands in Turkey, but this area is nowbeing threatened by the drying out of marshes andwater pollution. This wetland consists of twoecosystems: fresh- and saltwater. The recharge ofmarshes is from rainfall, the Gediz River andgroundwater from Can Suyu Pond. The water type ofthe river is Ca–Mg–Na-HCO3–SO4, whereas thegroundwater is a Na-Cl water type. The reasons forthe drying are long-term drought (evapotranspira-tion at 894 mm is >> rainfall at 546 mm), andexcessive pumping of groundwater and seawaterintrusion into Menemen Plain. Therefore, an addi-tional freshwater resource is necessary. This watercan be supplied from the limestone levels of Neo-gene sedimentary rocks in and around Izmir BirdParadise that have a Ca-HCO3 water type. Waterpollution levels were also analysed. In the freshwaterecosystem Cd, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb and Zn values,in the open channel in Izmir Bird Paradise Sb, Fe, Niand Cd values, and in the river Fe, Pb and Sb valuesexceed the TSE 266 and EPA 2000 standardsprobably due to agricultural and industrial sources.
Keywords Bird Paradise Æ Hydrochemistry ÆHydrogeology Æ Izmir Æ Turkey Æ Wetland
Introduction
Hydrology is probably the single most important deter-minant for the establishment and maintenance of specifictypes of wetlands and wetland processes. Water is almost
always the major source of nutrients to wetlands (Eser andRasen 1999). Wetlands receive surface water inputs fromstreams (surface runoff), precipitation and overland flow,and subsurface water inputs from surface infiltration,stream hyporheic zones and groundwater (Mann andWetzel 2000). Hydrochemical processes in coastal aquifersare important in sustaining water quality conditions infreshwater wetlands. As such, wetlands are importanthabitats that contribute to the biodiversity of the coastalzone: it is important that these processes are understoodand maintained (Malcolm and Soulsby 2001).Izmir Bird Paradise is located in the southern part ofLower Gediz Basin, which includes the Menemen Plain andIzmir (Fig. 1), and encompasses an area of approximately8,000 ha. Izmir Bird Paradise is one of the most valuablewetlands in Turkey caused by the Gediz River, and it formsfresh- and saltwater ecosystems that provide habitats for205 bird species (Siki 1999) and 308 vegetation species.Izmir Bird Paradise is included in the 1997 RamsarConvention for the protection of wetland areas.Until now, there has been scarce hydrogeological dataabout this wetland. Thus, this study is the first compre-hensive hydrogeological investigation, which was done inand around Izmir Bird Paradise, reporting on the hydro-geological, hydrological and hydrochemical data of IzmirBird Paradise.The specific objectives of this study are (1) the preliminaryinvestigation and interpretation of the hydrochemicalproperties of the fresh- and saltwater ecosystems, (2) tosuggest an alternative freshwater source for the dried reedsin Izmir Bird Paradise, and (3) to determine the waterpollution level and sources in and around Izmir BirdParadise.
Methodology
A total of 22 water samples from different places in andaround Izmir Bird Paradise were collected during 2000.The water samples were analysed according to APHA-AWWA-WCPF (1975), APHA-AWWA-WCPF 3110 (1992)and TSE 266). AQUACHEM 3.7 computer code was used toevaluate the hydrogeochemical data.Determination of pH, conductivity and both major andminor ions were made in the laboratory using theanalytical methods shown in Table 1.
Received: 9 April 2002 / Accepted: 26 August 2002Published online: 8 October 2002ª Springer-Verlag 2002
A.M. Somay (&) Æ S. FilizDokuz Eylul University,Geological Engineering Department,35100, Bornova, Izmir, TurkeyE-mail: [email protected]: +90-232-3887865
Original article
DOI 10.1007/s00254-002-0697-6 Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835 825
Climate and rainfall
Menemen Plain is dry–subhumid, with a third mesother-mal season of deficiency, with a large seasonal surplus anda temperature-efficiency regime third mesothermal(C1B1
3S2W2b13) according to the Thorntwaite classifica-
tion system (1948). The dry season occurs in summer(May through October) and the wet season occurs inwinter (November through April). According to the data ofKoy Hizmetleri Menemen Research Institute, the meanyearly temperature has been �16.9 �C in a 45-year period.June is the hottest month, January is the coolest. Averageyearly rainfall in Menemen Plain is estimated to be about546 mm. Average yearly actual evapotranspiration is about894 mm according to the Thorntwaite method. The mainfeatures regarding rainfall, temperatures, evaporation,relative humidity and wind are presented in Table 2Evapotranspiration was calculated using the Thorntwaitemethod (Table 3) and an evapotranspiration–rainfalldiagram is shown in Fig. 2.According to Fig. 2a, the amount of rainfall is greater thanpotential evapotranspiration in January, February andMarch; therefore, potential evapotranspiration is equal toreal evapotranspiration. Excessive water from rainfall(water surplus) recharges the surface and groundwater.From Fig. 2b, it can be seen that soil moisture utilizationresponds to water deficiency in April, May and June.Potential evapotranspiration is greater than rainfall;
Fig. 1Location map of the study area
Tab
le2
Cli
mat
ed
ata
bet
wee
n19
54–
1999
inM
enem
enP
lain
(So
may
2000
)
Mo
nth
sI
IIII
IIV
VV
IV
IIV
III
IXX
XI
XII
An
nu
al
Rai
nfa
ll(m
m)
Ave
rage
92.5
71.8
65.3
42.0
27.2
6.3
33.
59.
632
.378
.311
4.5
546.
3D
aily
max
.79
.064
.083
.942
.044
.632
.321
.633
.972
.969
.411
9.8
75.8
119.
5D
ate
22.1
.98
20.2
.65
19.3
.62
5.4.
7816
.5.8
211
.6.8
64.
7.59
12.8
.71
9.9.
6615
.10.
7716
.11.
6324
.12.
6718
.11.
63T
emp
erat
ure
(�C
)A
vera
ge7.
98.
810
.915
.020
.024
.626
.926
.122
.217
.113
9.7
16.9
Max
.22
.826
.531
.633
.840
.242
.442
.044
.341
.439
.431
.325
.444
.3D
ate
22.1
.98
28.2
.95
31.3
.77
17.4
.94
25.5
.94
14.6
.95
22.7
.94
24.8
.58
12.9
.94
2.10
.92
1.11
.92
21.1
2.64
24.8
.64
Min
.–
7.6
–5.
6–
4.4
–1.
42.
86.
710
.710
.86.
01.
2–
0.2
–4.
5–
7.6
Dat
e18
.1.6
49.
2.76
14.3
.87
10.4
.97
4.5.
903.
6.90
4.7.
6430
.8.9
528
.9.5
631
.10.
7428
.11.
7323
.12.
6818
.01.
63T
ota
l45
.351
.579
.811
2.1
169.
622
5.8
267.
323
3.3
164.
610
0.6
56.2
44.6
1,55
1E
vap
ora
tio
n(m
m)
Dai
lym
ax.
20.2
19.0
15.1
13.6
13.7
15.5
18.0
15.5
11.2
11.5
12.1
13.2
20.2
Dat
e29
.1.6
410
.2.7
29.
3.63
5.4.
6428
.5.9
94.
6.99
22.7
.83
4.8.
858.
9.70
16.1
0.75
5.11
.74
25.1
2.73
29.1
.64
Rel
ativ
eh
um
idit
y(%
)A
vera
ge64
.461
.060
.256
.954
.147
.946
.047
.352
.858
.261
.965
.156
.3M
ax10
0.0
99.0
99.0
100.
099
.099
.098
.099
.010
0.0
100.
010
0.0
99.0
100.
0D
ate
1968
1999
1999
1963
1991
1991
1999
1999
1959
1955
1959
1999
1955
Min
.14
.014
.012
.010
.010
.06.
06.
09.
09.
011
.012
.013
.06.
0D
ate
1997
1998
1989
1998
1998
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
Win
dsp
eed
(m/s
)A
vera
ge3.
93.
83.
32.
72.
52.
62.
92.
72.
42.
42.
73.
63.
0D
irec
tio
nE
EE
EE
NW
EE
EE
EE
E
Table 1Analytical methods (APHA-AWWA-WCPF 1975, 1992)
Ions Analytical method
HCO3–, CO3
2–, Cl– VolumetricSO4
2– GravimetricNa+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ Atomic absorption spectrometerFe, Mn, Ni, Sb, Pb, Cd, Cr Atomic absorption spectrometer
Original article
826 Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835
therefore, there is a water deficiency from June to Sep-tember. From Fig. 2c, it can be seen that in November andDecember, potential evapotranspiration is equal to realevapotranspiration as the rainfall is greater than potentialevapotranspiration. Soil moisture is recharged by excesswater. Other water recharges the surface and groundwater.
Geology and hydrogeology
Sedimentary and volcanic formations outcrop in theMenemen Plain (Fig. 3). Upper Cretaceous Bornova Me-lange (Erdogan 1990), which forms the basement rock ofthe area and consists of sandstone–shale intercalations, isnot suitable for groundwater storage and recharge due toits low permeability and porosity. Bornova Melange is notexposed in Izmir Bird Paradise.
Neogene sedimentary rocks that contain limestone–claystone–clayey limestone alternately overlay the BornovaMelange with an unconformity. Limestone, which hasrelatively high permeability due to its porous and frac-tured structure, is a good aquifer for water. Clayey levels ofNeogene constitute the impermeable base of the aquifers.Neogene volcanic rocks, which are composed of tuff,agglomerates and andesites, overlay the Neogene sedi-mentary rocks. Although the primary porosity of volcanicrocks is very low, tectonic activity has resulted in sec-ondary porosity, which gives rise to a significant increasein permeability. Therefore, tuff and andesite are suitablerocks to recharge and store groundwater, and high qualitywaters can be supplied from these rocks in the MenemenPlain. However, Neogene volcanic rocks are not found inIzmir Bird Paradise.The Quaternary alluvium that consists of clayey, silty,sandy and gravely levels overlays all of these rocks with an
Table 3Thorntwaite water balance. T Temperature (�C); TI temperature indices; PE potential evapotranspiration (mm); CF correction factor; CPEcorrected PE (mm); P precipitation (mm); DS storage change; S storage; ETR real evapotranspiration (mm); WD water deficiency; EWexcessive water; RO runoff (mm); MR moisture ratio
Date Jan. Feb. March April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total
T 7.9 8.8 10.9 15.0 20.0 24.6 26.9 26.1 22.2 17.1 13.0 9.7TI 2.0 2.4 3.3 5.3 8.2 11.2 12.8 12.2 9.6 6.4 4.2 2.7 80.1PE 15.6 18.9 27.7 48.9 81.5 117.9 138.2 131.0 98.2 61.7 37.9 22.5 799.9CF 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8CPE 13.4 15.9 28.5 53.7 99.5 145.0 172.8 153.3 101.1 59.8 32.2 18.7 893.9P 92.5 71.8 65.3 42.0 27.2 6.3 3.0 3.5 9.6 32.3 78.3 114.5 546.3DS –42.0 0.0 0.0 –11.7 –72.3 –16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 95.8S 100 100 100 88.3 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 142.0ETR 13.4 15.9 28.5 53.7 99.5 22.3 3.0 3.5 9.6 32.3 32.2 18.7 332.5WD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 122.7 169.8 149.8 91.5 27.5 0.0 0.0 561.4EW 121 55.9 36.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 213.8RO 60.5 88.5 46.4 18.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 213.8MR 4.9 2.8 1.4 –0.1 –0.7 –0.9 –1.0 –1.0 –0.9 –0.5 1.1 4.1 9.2
Fig. 2Thorntwaite evapotranspiration–rainfall dia-gram in Menemen Plain
Original article
Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835 827
Original article
828 Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835
unconformity. Alluvium is the most suitable layer tosupply groundwater for drinking water and agriculturalpurposes in and around Izmir Bird Paradise because of itshigh permeability. Data of groundwater depths aroundIzmir Bird Paradise, which were measured by DSI inOctober 1980 and October 1998, are shown in Table 4.According to the October 1998 data, the general flowdirection of the groundwater is towards to the MenemenPlain (Fig. 3). This flow direction can be explained asseawater recharges the fresh groundwater. From 1980 to1998, groundwater depths declined by about 8–13 m(Table 4). Long-term drought and excessive pumping inthe study area have resulted in these large drawdowns ofthe water table in the unconfined aquifer of the coastalarea.The formation period of the Izmir Bird Paradise and theMenemen Plain, which is the delta of the Gediz River, allbegan at the same time. During the redistribution of soilscarried down the seaward-bound Gediz River (the same areaas today’s reedy area), these residues were deposited and,eventually, the reedy area blocked the one-time connectionbetween Izmir Bay and the Aegean Sea. Human interventionin 1863 helped to transform the bed of the Gediz River andhelped to shape the present Izmir Bird Paradise and provideboth salt- and freshwater ecosystems (Atis 1999).
Hydrochemistry
Izmir Bird Paradise consists of two ecosystems, fresh-and saltwater, according to hydrochemical data. The
freshwater ecosystem is made up of surface water,marshes and the Gediz River, and the groundwater isfrom Can Suyu Pond. The freshwater marshes receivetheir surface water inputs from Gediz River and rainfall.In addition, some marshes were destroyed in 1980 dueto construction of Kozluca Set and drainage work (Siki1999). It is worth highlighting that the freshwaterecosystem is salinized as a result of the change in of theGediz River bed from 1863, a long-term drought andseawater intrusion. On the other hand, the Lower GedizBasin’s delta contains one of the largest salt flats inTurkey. The leaching of salts during subsequent rainfallevents, in combination with evaporation losses, increasesthe concentrations of Na and Cl in the soil andgroundwater (Malcolm and Soulsby 2001). These effectshave also dried the reeds; consequently, the reedsrequire a freshwater source. In order to address this,initial treatments were conducted in Izmir Bird Paradiseby DSI (Devlet Su Isleri) in the Can Suyu Pond Project.A well was drilled in 1992 by DSI in Suzbeyli to supplyfreshwater to the reed beds. About 30 l/s supplies theIzmir Bird Paradise with a pipe of 5,800 m in length.This groundwater constitutes a natural pond in thewetland and is released to the reeds. However, due tothe insufficiency of this method, the Gediz River watersand irrigation wastewaters accumulate at Bedir Bridgeand they are released by a cover that was constructed byDSI (D9 cover). Although all these treatments have beendone, brining of the reeds still continues. The waterlevel of the marshes in the rainy season is about 80 cm,but in the dry season the reed beds are dried out due tolack of fresh water.The natural weirs, Homa, Kirdeniz and Cilazmak, and thesaltpans, e.g. Izmir Camalti Saltpan, constitute thesaltwater ecosystem.The water samples were taken from fresh- and saltwaterecosystems, from dug wells in the Neogene Hills, fromopen channels in and around Izmir Bird Paradise andfrom Gediz River (Fig. 4, Table 5). Some physical andchemical properties of these waters are shown in Table 6.
Fresh- and saltwater ecosystems
In the freshwater ecosystem measured pH values rangebetween 7.6 and 8.8 (slightly alkaline) for surface waterand 6.46 and 7.8 for groundwater. Measured surface waterconductivity values range between 651–36,100 lmhos/cm,and groundwater conductivity values range between 420–4,490 lmhos/cm.Hydrogeochemical facies were used to describe the bodiesof groundwater in an aquifer that differ in their chemicalcomposition. The facies are the function of lithology,solution kinetics and flow patterns of the aquifer (Back1966). Classification of waters depends on the principles ofthe IAH (International Association of Hydrogeologist)1979. Total equivalents of cations and anions were taken as100% and ions, as more than 20% (meq/l), were evaluatedin the classification.
Fig. 3Geological map of Menemen Plain and groundwater flow directionaround Izmir Bird Paradise. Modified from Somay and Filiz (2001b)
Table 4Groundwater depths data around Izmir Bird Paradise (Somay andFiliz 2001a)
Location Water depth 1980 Water depth 1998(m) (m)
Eski Mezarlik vicinity – –6.45Tuzcullu +2.20 –6.70Suzbeyli – –3.10Kucukkoy Farm – –9.60Cakirkuyu – –9.40Karadede – –8.00Yerli Alani – –3.75Karaburunbagi – –8.00Haci Huseyin wells – –6.20Seyrek well – –12.10Seyrek vicinity –1.20 –8.80Seyrek – –8.43Degirmen Hill – –8.45Degirmen Hill – –9.91Kesikkoy –1.80 –13.00Gunerli water store –0.35 –12.50South of Gunerli – –12.00Orta Koy (2825 DSI) –2.82 –15.40Musabey well –2.10 –12.40
b
Original article
Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835 829
Fig. 4Location map of the sample points
Table 5Sample names and locations ofthe water samples
Samplename
Location Samplename
Location
1 Dug well at Poyraz Hill 12 Gediz River (Maltepe)2 Dug well at Orta Hill 13 Gediz River (Old Bergama Bridge)3 Fault spring at Lodos Hill 14 Gediz River (Muradiye Bridge)4 Drinking water (Tasli Hills) 15 Gediz River (Akhisar Bridge)5 Drinking water of Maltepe
Village (Tasli Hills)16 Saltpan
6 Marshes 17 Saltpan7 Marshes 18 Open channel in front of the Visitor Centre8 Can Suyu Pond 19 Open channel in front of the Seyrek municipality9 Can Suyu Pond 20 Open channel east of the Maltepe Leather Zone
10 Bedir Bridge 21 Open channel in front of Maltepe village11 Bedir Bridge 22 Seawater
Original article
830 Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835
The water type of the marshes is Na-Cl both in the dry andrainy season. Although the marshes are recharged by rain-fall and groundwater, the amount of rainfall is lower thanevapotranspiration and the groundwater is already mixedwith seawater. These waters are ‘slightly saline–saline’according to TDS values, which can be reach 22,174 mg/l.The samples of river water were taken from the source ofthe Lower Gediz Basin to Maltepe, where the river is spillsout to the sea, and also from Bedir Bridge in Izmir BirdParadise in the rainy season. The water type is Na–Ca–Mg-HCO3–SO4 at Bedir Bridge; the others type are Ca–Mg–Na-HCO3–SO4. These waters are ‘fresh’ water according toTDS with a maximum of 871 mg/l.At Can Suyu Pond, the major cation is Na and the majoranion is Cl. This can be explained by the seawater rechargeinto the groundwater at Suzbeyli. This water is classified as‘saline’ by TDS values.The behaviour of the marshes and Can Suyu Pond closestto the coast is of interest. These points show a rise inconductivity (values reach 36,100 lmhos/cm) and in Clcontent (more than 10,000 mg/l). This feature, combinedwith the changes in the other ionic relationships such asMg/Ca ratio, rises from 0.508 to 1.317, and the Cl/HCO3
ratio increases from 1.858 to 48.047.A preliminary characterization, carried out using the Pipertriangular diagram, shown in Fig. 5, shows the differentgeochemistry of the sampled waters. This diagram showsthat marshes, Can Suyu Pond and the saltpans are a Na-Cltype; Gediz River is a Ca–HCO3 type and Bedir Bridgewater is a mixed water type.In the Schoeller semi-logarithmic diagram (Fig. 6a) it canbe seen that all the freshwater ecosystems show the samepeak with seawater and this can be explained by seawaterintrusion. In addition to the long-term drought, reeds aresalinized and need fresh water. Gediz River water plots atlower levels on the diagram due to the lack of seawaterinfluence (Fig. 6b).The evidence of seawater intrusion between fresh- andsaltwater is reflected in the Piper triangular diagramshown in Fig. 5 and the Schoeller semi-logarithmicdiagram shown in Fig. 6, respectively.In this study, five water samples were taken from dug wellsin the Neogene Hills. The measured pH values range be-tween 6.46 and 7.4 (neutral) and the conductivity valueswere between 587 and 2,260 lmhos/cm. These waters areclassified as ‘freshwater’ by the TDS system. The majoranion is Na, except at Poyraz Hill, and the major cation isHCO3, except at Poyraz and Orta Hills. The general watertype is Ca-HCO3 according to the IAH (1979). The averageMg/Ca ratio is 0.197 and Cl/HCO3 is about 0.606. In a Pipertriangular diagram, the water from dug wells plots on theCa-HCO3 area except for Poyraz Hills water. Due to theinfluence of seawater at Poyraz and Orta Hills, the watertype is Na-Cl. In the Schoeller diagram, these waters plot ata lower part of the diagram, but give similar signatureswith seawater. According to these results it is widely ac-cepted that freshwater can be supplied from the limestonelevels of the Neogene Hills according to the water qualitycriteria for dried marshes.
Tab
le6
Ch
emic
alco
mp
osi
tio
no
fw
ater
sfr
om
inan
dar
ou
nd
Izm
irB
ird
Par
adis
e.V
alu
esin
mg/
l;T
DS
tota
ld
isso
lved
soli
ds;
EC
elec
tric
alco
nd
uct
ivit
y(l
mh
os/
cm);
SWse
awat
er
Sam
ple
no
.T
DS
Dat
ep
HE
CN
a+K
+C
a2+
Mg2
+C
l–H
CO
3–
SO2
–4
CO
2–
3%
Na
Wat
erty
pe
IAH
(1979)
11,
377
24.4
.00
6.75
2,26
034
238
7326
515
283
100
–73
Na–
Cl-
HC
O3
274
124
.4.0
07.
321,
100
110
2110
010
160
250
90–
48C
a–N
a-C
l–H
CO
3
330
124
.4.0
07.
4042
012
1260
454
122
37–
20C
a-H
CO
3–
Cl
452
826
.5.0
06.
4658
720
111
27
3628
171
–13
Ca-
HC
O3–
SO4
588
126
.5.0
06.
531,
127
814
107
4378
366
202
–29
Ca–
Mg–
Na-
HC
O3–
SO4
622
,174
24.4
.00
7.82
36,1
005,
417
313
696
1,33
412
,300
249
1,75
511
063
Na–
Mg-
Cl
73,
865
14.1
0.00
7.60
3,55
01,
255
1161
541,
830
556
98–
88N
a-C
l8
2,72
124
.4.0
07.
204,
320
885
3641
451,
050
565
99–
87N
a-C
l–H
CO
3
94,
860
14.1
0.00
7.80
4,49
01,
656
1141
542,
420
591
87–
92N
a-C
l10
775
11.5
.00
8.72
719
105
1061
3150
300
200
1846
Na–
Ca–
Mg-
HC
O3–
SO4
1187
114
.10.
008.
893
010
723
5146
8532
521
717
45N
a–M
g–C
a-H
CO
3–
SO4
1261
320
.8.0
08.
1971
656
2464
3156
262
114
635
Ca–
Mg–
Na-
HC
O3–
SO4
1364
220
.8.0
07.
9667
846
2365
3561
299
106
730
Ca–
Mg–
Na-
HC
O3–
SO4
1461
320
.8.0
07.
8965
146
2459
3343
299
9910
31C
a–M
g–N
a-H
CO
3–
SO4
1560
620
.8.0
08.
0665
943
2360
3245
287
109
713
Ca–
Mg–
Na-
HC
O3–
SO4
1622
,023
24.4
.00
7.75
22,4
004,
600
208
810
1,20
58,
000
150
7,00
050
60N
a–M
g–C
l–SO
4
1788
,933
24.4
.00
7.44
12,9
400
18,4
501,
199
3,29
28,
230
56,8
0012
478
058
50N
a–M
g-C
l18
59,4
7914
.10.
008.
3017
,500
16,7
361,
086
710
3,39
031
,800
237
5,44
872
71N
a–M
g-C
l19
560
26.5
.00
7.32
565
4510
6523
3322
715
7–
30C
a–N
a–M
g-H
CO
3–
SO4
201,
616
26.5
.00
7.26
2,12
034
814
8055
430
398
279
1265
Na-
Cl–
HC
O3-S
O4
2156
226
.5.0
06.
7755
945
1056
3433
225
159
–28
Mg–
Ca–
Na-
HC
O3–
SO4
SW39
,763
8.01
61,8
0011
,955
936
532
1,05
221
,850
373,
401
–83
Na-
Cl
Original article
Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835 831
The water samples were taken from saltpans in the rainyseason. Measured pH values are approximately 7.6(slightly alkaline) and conductivity values range between22,400 and 129,400 lmhos/cm. The water type is Na–Mg-Cl according to the IAH (1979) and these waters are‘saline’. water according to TDS values, and can reach88,933 mg/l.A high concentration of salts in the irrigation water ren-ders the soil saline. This affects the salt intake capacity ofthe plants through their roots (Srinivasa Rao and others1997). The Wilcox diagram (1955) is used for the classi-fication of irrigation water. This graph is based on theelectrical conductivity (EC) and on the sodium percentage(%Na). The marshes, Can Suyu Pond and the saltpans are‘unsuitable’; Gediz River and Neogene Hills waters are‘good to permissible–excellent to good’, except PoyrazHill, which is ‘doubtful to unsuitable’ (Fig. 7).
Open channel waters in andaround Izmir Bird Paradise
Water samples were taken from some open channels in therainy season because these channels transport Gediz Riverand irrigation waste waters to Izmir Bird Paradise. One ofthem was taken in front of the Visitor Centre and theothers were taken around Izmir Bird Paradise. MeasuredpH values ranged from 6.77 to 8.3 (neutral to slightlyalkaline) and the conductivity values were between 559and 17,500 lmhos/cm. The dominant cation was Na andthe dominant anion was Cl in front of the Visitor Centre at
Izmir Bird Paradise (18) and east of the Maltepe LeatherZone channel (20). At the other channels, Seyrek (19) andMaltepe (21), the water type is Ca–Na–Mg-HCO3–SO4.According to TDS values, 18 and 20 are ‘saline’, and 19 and21 are ‘fresh’ water. When an area of low rainfall and ac-cumulated solutes is reclaimed by irrigation, the increasedwater supply tends to leach away the solutes and sulphateappears in the drainage water or return flow (Hem 1989).Therefore, these waters, like the river waters, have sulphateconcentrations of more than 20% (meq/l).These waters, determined by the Piper triangular diagram,are shown in Fig. 5. According to this diagram, 18 and 20are a Na-Cl type; the other channel waters (19–21) are aCa-HCO3 type.As shown in the Schoeller semi-logarithmic diagram(Fig. 6b), seawater and open channel waters that wereclassified as 18–20 give similar signatures due to releasedwaste water, which consists of high levels of dissolvedsolids from leather and agricultural processes.In the Wilcox diagram, these waters are classified as‘unsuitable’ except for the Seyrek and Maltepe channels(Fig. 7).
Water pollution in and aroundIzmir Bird Paradise
The sources of the environmental problems and heavymetal analyses are given in this section. In MenemenPlain there are two hazardous factors for Izmir BirdParadise:
Fig. 5Distribution of waters in the Piper triangulardiagram
Original article
832 Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835
1. Industrial zones: one is constructed in the delta of theGediz River, and is named Ataturk Organized IndustrialZone; the other one is the Maltepe Leather IndustrialZone. This latter zone is constructed on the Tasli Hills,which consists of Neogene sedimentary rocks in thenorthern part of Izmir Bird Paradise (Fig. 1). Both ofthem do have purification systems, however, especiallyin the Maltepe Leather Industrial Zone, great quantitiesof water are used during leather processing. This resultsin wastewater that contains organic matter such as bothsolid and liquid proteins, bristles, wool, leather parti-cles, magnesium, calcium and chrome. The mostimportant characteristic of this wastewater is its highsalinity and low alkalinity (Somay and Filiz 2001b).Waters that include heavy metals such as chrome arereleased into open channels that transport freshwater toIzmir Bird Paradise, after being used in the leatherprocessing (Somay and Filiz 2001b). Heavy metalanalysis was done from the open channel (21) thatcarries water to Izmir Bird Paradise from in front of the
Leather Industrial Zone (Table 7). According to thisresult Cr and Pb values significantly exceed the TSE 266and EPA 2000 standards (2000). Dead fish are seen inthis channel, probably due to the high level of Cr that isused in the leather processing.
2. Gediz River: this river is already contaminated by do-mestic, industrial and agricultural wastes from differentplaces, especially Manisa (Somay and Filiz 2001b).Thus, this water cannot be available for treatment of thereeds. Heavy metal analyses have been taken fromthe beginning of Lower Gediz Basin to Maltepe wherethe river spills out to sea and are shown in Table 8.
In the river, Fe, Pb and Sb values are above the standards.This will have a tremendous effect for Izmir Bird Paradisebecause the open channels to the marshes transports thisriver water.The heavy metal contents analysed were taken from openchannels in front of Izmir Bird Paradise (18), Can SuyuPond (9), Bedir Bridge (10) and the reed beds (7). Theresults of the analyses are shown in Table 9.According to these results, the water from the openchannels contains high levels of Pb, Cr, Cu, Sb, Fe, Mn, Niand Cd. Because this channel acts as a kind of wastewater
Fig. 6Distribution of waters in the Schoeller semi-logarithmic diagram. AFresh- and saltwater ecosystems, B open channels and Gediz River
Original article
Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835 833
and irrigation return flow channel, there is heavy metalcontamination. The heavy metal content of Can Suyu Pondis composed of Pb, Cr, Sb, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn and Cd. In themarshes, Pb, Cr, Sb, Fe, Ni, Zn and Cd values are highaccording to TSE 266 and EPA 2000 (2000) standards.
Without any doubt, these results show that Izmir BirdParadise is being threatened. This contamination isprobably a result of the industrial zones and agriculturalprocesses.
Conclusions and recommendations
Average yearly rainfall in Menemen Plain is estimated tobe about 546 mm whereas the mean actual potentialevapotranspiration is 894 mm, which is estimated as‘drought’ according to the Thorntwaite method (1948).The mean temperature is about 16.9 �C.The groundwater flow direction is from SW to NE, indi-cating seawater intrusion occurs around Izmir Bird Para-dise. It is seen that groundwater levels have decreased byabout 8–13 m in a 20-year period because of long-termdrought and excessive pumping of groundwater.There are two ecosystems coexisting, salt- and freshwater,within Izmir Bird Paradise according to hydrochemicaland hydrogeological data. The freshwater ecosystem con-stitutes the marshes, Can Suyu Pond and Gediz River. Themaximum value of conductivity is 36,100 lmhos/cm in themarshes, and the minimum value is 651 lmhos/cm inGediz River. In the marshes, Can Suyu Pond and BedirBridge the major cation is Na and the major anion is Cl. Inthe saltwater ecosystem, the EC values reach129,400 lmhos/cm and the water type is Na–Mg-Cl. Onthe Schoeller semi-logarithmic diagram, all the freshwaterecosystem waters give similar signatures with seawater.Therefore, seawater intrusion plays an essential role inboth fresh- and saltwater ecosystems. However, GedizRiver waters plot at lower levels in this diagram. Accordingto the Wilcox diagram, all these waters are ‘unsuitable’except for Gediz River.It is very difficult to avoid the conclusion that the marshesin Izmir Bird Paradise are drying out due to the work onthe Gediz River bed in 1893, the long-term drought and theseawater intrusion in Menemen Plain. Therefore, surfaceand groundwater inputs have declined. In this study, afreshwater resource was investigated and water sampleswere taken from dug wells in Neogene Hills. At the dugwells (in Poyraz, Orta, Lodos and Tasli Hills) EC valuesrange between 420 and 2,260 lmhos/cm. The dominantcation is Ca, the dominant anion is HCO3, and the averageMg/Ca ratio is 0.197 and Cl/HCO3 is about 0.606. Thesewaters are also suitable for irrigation. These analyses on
Fig. 7Wilcox diagram for irrigation classification of the waters
Table 7Heavy metal analysis of the open channel in front of the MaltepeLeather zone (values in mg/l). Bold data are values that exceed TSE266 and EPA 2000 (2000) standards
Location Cd Cu Cr Fe Mn Pb Zn
21 Trace Trace 0.419 0.245 0.024 0.050 0.032TSE 266 0.005 0.100 0.050 0.200 0.050 0.050 0.100EPA 2000 0.005 1.300 0.100 0.300 0.050 0.015 0.150
Table 8Heavy metal analyses of Gediz River (values in mg/l; TSE 266; Somay and Filiz 2001b). Bold data are values that exceed TSE 266 and EPA 2000(2000) standards
Location Cd Cu Cr Fe Mn Ni Pb Sb Zn
12 Trace Trace 0.031 0.540 0.025 0.014 0.040 0.215 0.08613 Trace Trace 0.017 0.461 0.051 0.014 0.052 0.328 0.00714 Trace Trace 0.017 0.324 0.001 0.017 0.055 0.370 0.02115 Trace Trace 0.024 0.508 0.001 0.011 0.052 0.265 TraceTSE 266 0.005 0.100 0.050 0.200 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.010 0.100EPA 2000 0.005 1.300 0.100 0.300 0.050 – 0.015 0.006 0.150
Original article
834 Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835
water from the limestone that forms the Neogene sedi-mentary rocks suggests that this could be used as a newfreshwater source according to the hydrochemistry data.For, the water samples that were taken from open channelsin and around Izmir Bird Paradise, the conductivity valuesranged between 559 and 17,500 lmhos/cm. The channelwaters that are found in Izmir Bird Paradise and in Mal-tepe are classified as ‘unsuitable’ in the Wilcox Diagram. Inthese channels, the major cation is Na and the major anionis Cl because the waste waters consist of high levels ofdissolved solids released from leather and agriculturalsources. The other channels (19–21) are ‘excellent to good’on the Wilcox diagram.The heavy metal contents of the freshwater in Gediz Riverand some open channels exceed the TSE 266 and EPA 2000standards (2000). In the freshwater ecosystem this in-cludes, especially, Pb, Cr, Sb, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cd; in GedizRiver this includes Fe, Pb and Sb; in the open channel inIzmir Bird Paradise it includes Pb, Cr, Sb, Fe, Mn, Ni andCd; in the open channel in front of Maltepe Leather Zone itincludes Cr, Fe and Pb, which clearly exceed the tolerancelimits of TSE 266 and EPA 2000 standards (2000). Thepollution load recorded from Gediz River to the marshes isprincipally caused by discharge from the industrial zonesand by periodic pumping of groundwater in MenemenPlain. Also, the presence of towns and human activities,such as agriculture and urbanization result in pressure onthe quality of surface and groundwater in the study area.From the point of hydrogeological practice, it is importantto note that in the near future this pollution will threatenthis wetland ecosystems. Therefore, the following pointsneed to be addressed:
• Excessive pumping of groundwater must be preventedin the Menemen Plain.
• The waste and waste waters should not be released toGediz River basin.
• Industrial zones must use purification systems.• Farmers must use fertilizers and pesticides conscien-
tiously.
References
APHA-AWWA-WPCF (1975) Standard methods for the examin-ation of water and waste water, 14th edn. APHA-AWWA-WPCF,Washington, DC
APHA-AWWA-WPCF 3110 (1992) Standard methods for exam-ination of water and waste water, 18th edn. APHA-AWWA-WPCF, Washington, DC
Atis I (1999) Izmir Kus Cennetindeki Tatli Su Yetersizligi Sorunuve DSI Calismalari. Izmir Su Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabi, Izmir,pp 289–295
Back W (1966) Hydrochemical facies and groundwater flow pat-tern in northern part of Atlantic Coastal Plain. US GeologicalSurvey Professional Paper 498-A
EPA (2000) EPA 2000 standards. http://www.epa.gov/safewater/mcl.html
Erdogan B (1990) Izmir–Ankara Zonu’nun, Izmir ile SeferihisarArasindaki Bolgede Stratigrafik Ozellikleri ve Tektonik Evrimi.TPJD Bulteni 2/1, Ankara
Eser P, Rasen MR (1999) The influence of groundwater hydrologyand stratigraphy on the hydrochemistry of Stump Bay, SouthTaupo Wetland, New Zealand. J Hydrol 220:27–47
Hem JD (1989) Study and interpretation of the chemical char-acteristics of natural waters. US Geological Survey Water-SupplyPaper 2254, 3rd edn. Washington, DC
IAH (International Association of Hydrogeologists) (1979) Mapof mineral and thermal water of Europe. Scale: 1:500,000. IAH,United Kingdom
Malcolm R, Soulsby C (2001) Hydrochemistry of groundwater incoastal wetlands: implications for coastal conservation inScotland. Sci Total Environ 265:269–280
Mann CJ, Wetzel RG (2000) Hydrology of an impounded loticwetland – wetland sediment characteristics. Wetlands 20–21:23–32
Somay AM (2000) Izmir Kus Cenneti’nin Hidrolojisi, Hidrojeol-ojisi ve Hidrojeokimyasi (in Turkish). MSc Tezi, Dokuz EylulUniversitesi, Jeoloji Muhendisligi Bolumu, Izmir. MTA (2000)
Somay AM, Filiz S (2001a) Izmir Kus Cenneti’nin HidrojeolojikIrdelenmesi. Yeralti Sulari ve Cevre Sempozyumu. BildirilerKitabi, Izmir, pp 263–273
Somay AM, Filiz S (2001b) Current hydrogeological problems ofLower Gediz Basin. International Earth Sciences Colloquium onthe Aegean Region (IESCA-2000). Proceedings 169–176, Izmir
Siki M (1999) Izmir Kus Cenneti’nin Dunu, Bugunu ve Yarini. II.Kiyi Sorunlari ve Cevre Sempozyumu. Bildiri Kitabi, Kusadasi,pp 748–756
Srinivasa Rao Y, Reddy TVK, Nayudu PT (1997) Groundwaterquality in the Niva River Basin, Chittoor district, AndhraPradesh, India. Environ Geol 32(1):56–63
Thorntwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classifi-cation of climate. Geogr Rev 38:55–94
TSE 266 (1997) Turk Standardi: Sular-Icme ve Kullanma Sulari,1. Baski, Ankara
Wilcox LV (1955) Classification and use of irrigation waters. USDept Agriculture Circular
Table 9Heavy metal analyses results in Izmir Bird Paradise (values in mg/l). Bold data are values that exceed TSE 266 and EPA 2000 (2000) standards
Location Cd Cu Cr Fe Mn Ni Pb Sb Zn
7 0.013 0.019 0.110 0.677 0.050 0.150 0.180 1.477 0.5529 0.015 0.021 0.110 1.555 0.400 0.201 0.160 1.705 0.471
10 0.004 0.004 0.120 0.677 0.088 0.116 0.080 0.682 0.04718 0.086 0.170 0.440 8.929 1.050 1.343 0.560 5.909 0.087TSE 266 0.005 0.100 0.050 0.200 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.010 0.100EPA 2000 0.005 1.300 0.100 0.300 0.050 – 0.015 0.006 0.150
Original article
Environmental Geology (2003) 43:825–835 835