hydrodynamic flow from fast particles jorge casalderrey-solana. e. v. shuryak, d. teaney suny- stony...
DESCRIPTION
Large initial Disturbances Right after the jet passage, the deposited energy needs to thermalize. This is a non dissipative process We assume that the typical scale for this process is set by The initial disturbance is: background energy Strong initial modifications ! We cannot do an accurate matching of the jet and the medium.TRANSCRIPT
Hydrodynamic Flow from Fast Particles
Jorge Casalderrey-Solana.E. V. Shuryak, D. Teaney
SUNY- Stony Brook
The energy can be absorbed into the medium, either by absorption of the radiated gluons or because of collision loses.
Where does the energy go?
This energy incorporates to the hydrodynamic evolution of the medium and leads to jet induced collective effects.
Parton propagation in the QGP leads to energy loss but what happens to the energy?
The energy can be radiated out of the interaction medium. Energy then means degradation of the energy into (medium induced) gluons.
We assume that most of the energy is absorbed and thermalized.
Large initial DisturbancesRight after the jet passage, the deposited energy needs to thermalize. This is a non dissipative process
We assume that the typical scale for this process is set by
fmpes 1.034
The initial disturbance is:
1100363
s
s
edxdE
background energy
Strong initial modifications !
We cannot do an accurate matching of the jet and the medium.
Coupling of the jet to hydroWe describe the excited medium through hydrodynamics
xJT
xJxddtdP
3
00,1,12
2/32
2 22
trx jetedxdEJ
Function with zero integral
The functional form of is unknown. It is only constraint by the energy loss, but it does not determine it.
Contains the information about the deposition/themalization of the energy and momentum
xJ
We try to characterize different flows consistent with the energy loss constraint (without an explicit source).
We do this in the region far from the jet, where the perturbation is small and we can use linearized hydro.
Linearized Modes 0xxX
00 vtx
Mach cone
RURhu
uT
'
'
2222 sst c isit RR 2
43
soundpropagating mode
diffusonnot propagating mode
Far away from the fluid:
Rotational flow
Excitation Mechanisms To study how the two modes are excited we study the flux momentum. In the jet rest frame:
ddE
ddST
ddS
TddE j
Rj
Rjj
Fixed v 0ddE
dtdPv
dtdE j
x
Isentropic interactions: The fluid is mainly potential (irrotational). On shell propagation requires that no significant entropy is produced and there is no vorticity. The Eloss is quadratic in the amplitude of the perturbation.
Non isentropic interactions: the main excitation mechanism is entropy production and the flow field introduces vorticity.
Jet Induced Flow: Correlations
Two particle correlation experiments: trigger in a high energy particle and look at correlated softer particles.
Jet Quenching biases trigger jets to be produced next to the interaction region surface.
The back jet travels preferentially though the whole interaction region.
The back jet modifies the fluid by the energy/momentum loss until it is absorbed.
Regardless of the excitation mechanisms, shock waves are formed in the medium. We want to study their effect in the particle production.
Spectrum• Cooper-Fry with equal time freeze out
f
t
ffff
z
Tvp
TT
TE
TE
Tup
ptz
edVedVpddp
dN
330
2 22
• At low pt~Tf
)cos(42 3
02
pP
TPE
TEVe
pddpdN dep
f
tdep
f
TE
ptz
f
z
• Pt >>the spectrum is more sensitive to the “hottest points” (shock and regions close to the jet)
•If the jet energy is enough to punch through, fragmentation part on top of “thermal” spectrum
Non Isentropic InteractionBoth the vorticity and the entropy production lead to modification in the near field (non-hydrodynamic core).The presence of the diffusion mode make the liquid to move preferentially along the jet direction. correlations at .
Non-trivial structure is not observed.
inclusivejet dyddN
dyddN
dyddN
2010 Tpt fmGeV
dxdE 6.12
fmGeV
dxdE 2
Isentropic Interactions: Correlations
51 Tpt
105 Tpt
15103 Tpt
201510 Tpt
Non trivial correlation in inclusivejet dyd
dNdyddN
dyddN
263TdxdE
75.0T 1.0Ts
Simple simulationStatic homogeneous baryon free fluid.Ideal QGP equation of state.Only one jet energy.
TdxdEE 8
3
1arccos
Experimental Correlation. +/-1.23=1.91,4.37
51 Tpt
105 Tpt
15103 Tpt
201510 Tpt
3
1arccos
51 Tpt
105 Tpt
15103 Tpt
201510 Tpt
Expansion effectsWe study a simple dynamical model: A static liquid in a dynamic gravity field:
2222222 xddRxdtRdtd
Big Bang like
R is an external parameter, we choose it as ,3/1
0
00
tttRtR
From the potential (in Fourier space)
SsR 3
GkisksTvG iiii
02 GMGM
22
1
ss RTccMM 222
sck
Harmonic oscillator with time dependent mass and frequency
decreases with increasing R for c2s < 1/3
RTM 1
Expansion effects: Amplitude We assume adiabatic changes:
skcddM
M
1
ss
s
kcddc
c
2
2
1
There is an (approximately) constant of motion. The adiabatic invariant:
pdqI harmonic oscillator
kMIcG s
k2
MIkcR
Tv sk 2
For RHIC, the evolution changes the fireball radius (from ~6fm to ~15 fm) and the c2
s from 1/3 to 0.2 the amplitude v/T grows by a factor 3.
Energy loss quadratic in the amplitude Since energy loss is quadratic in the amplitude, dE/dx could be reduced by a factor 9.
Tvk
Tvk
1t
2t
T
T
t<tM t=tM t>tM t>>tM
Expansion effects: Reflected Waves If the deconfinement phase transition is fist order then
0sc (mixed phase)
From hydro simulations, the QGP, mixed, and hadron gas phases last the same time t~4-5 fm. The second cone moves backwards particle correlated in the trigger jet direction
A
B
3MtAB
2.0MtBC
A reflected wave appears second cone
4.1cos
MtCBABar
Expansion effects: Reflected Waves
In central collisions no correlations are observed at ~1.4 rad
In more peripheral, there is some correlation but looks like the shoulder of the Mach peak.
The non observation of the reflected peak seems to indicate that the QCD phase transition may not to be first order (experimentally).
If collective effects are the responsible of non trivial dihadron distributions:
Conical Flow in AdS/CFT?(Friess, Gubser, Michalogiorgakis, Pufu hep-th/0607022)
Motion of a heavy quark in strongly coupled N=4 SYM
The AdS/CFT provides the exact matching of the jet and the medium
Looking at T00 they found the shock waves in N=4 SYM
This is a dynamical model which allows to address how much energy is thermalized and how it incorporates into the hydro evolution.
Conclusions • We have used hydrodynamics to follow the
energy deposited in the medium.• Finite cs leads to the appearance of a Mach
cone (conical flow correlated to the jet)• Depending on the initial conditions, the
direction of the cone is reflected in the final particle production.
• Density decrease of expanding medium increases the Mach cone signal
• First order phase transition reflected waves (correlations at ).
Back up slides
<= RHIC
• c2s is not constant through system evolution:
csQGP= , cs= in the resonance gas and cs~0 in the mixed phase.
p/e() = EoS along fixed nB/s lines
Considerations about Expansion
•Distance traveled by sound is reduced Mach direction changes
2.031
33.0)(1
sf
avs cdc
(Hung,E. Shuryak hep-ph/9709264)
• = 1.23 rad =71o
Non Isentropic InteractionBoth the vorticity and the entropy production lead to modification in the near field (non-hydrodynamic core).
tzppttz ddppdp
dNQ
c0
1:)(
tzppttz dppdp
dNQ0
:
The presence of the diffusion mode make the liquid to move preferentially along the jet direction. correlations at .
No non-trivial structure is observed.