hydrochemistry tests in the exploratory studies … · hydrochemistry tests in the exploratory...
TRANSCRIPT
0 c t ~~~~< 4 ,&1& 6', .YMP/TPP 92-12
- 7-I U.S. DEPARMEN OF ENs
0
I RW "X=M \
I 10,
- . YUCCA MOUNTAIN_SISITE CHARACTERIZATION
_ommmmmm PROJECT
HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS INTHE EXPLORATORYSTUDIES FACILIT
Rev. 3 TNO
TEST PLANNING PACKAGE92-1 2
I
9507030340 950626PDR WASTEWM-11 PDR
,o9b
DECEMBER 1994UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
'I-
T-
* YMP-071-R2
06/06/94
YUCCA MOUNTAIN SITE CHARACTERIZATION PROJECTTEST PLANNING PACKAGE APPROVAL AND RELEASE
Test Planning Package Title: Hydrochemistry Tests in the Exploratory Studies Facility Revision: Rev. 3
Test Planning Package Number: TPP 92-12
Responsible Project Engineer: R. Oliver
Summary of Scope: Hydrochemistry Testing in Alcove #1, including supplemental performance criteria to revision2 that specify precision and accuracy of balance used to weigh core.
Job Package Number: JP 95-1
WBS Number (third level): 1.2.3
Affected Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Concurrence of requirements by affected Technical Project Officers and Assistant Managers
TPO: L. Hayes Date:
TPO: Date:
TPO: Date:
TPO: __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date: _ _ _ _ _ _
TPO: Date:
Affected Assistant Managers:
lkl�,- , /- , /,-7//AM:
AM: _
AM: _
Release to:
V - // FO M A,)
(AMEFO)
Date:
Date: / -Z
Date:
Assistant Manager forAdministration for job assembly
for nonfield work
'WI/ -7- _9 -.
Z Ofzl
YMSCO Approvals:
Responsible Assistant Manage(AMSP)
Date: MA!Zfls
Exhibit YAP-5.5Q.2
TPP 92-12*HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE- EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
Rev. 3Page 1 of IS
TEST PLANNING PACKAGE 92-12HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
CONTENTS
1.0 LIST OF STUDY PLANS OR SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION PLANS USED INSCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION ................................................................ 2
2.0 WORK SCOPE ............................................................... 2
3.0 INVESTIGATIONS CONTROLS ................................................................ 23.1 Interference ............................................................... 33.2 Impacts to Waste Isolation ................................................................ 33.3 Environmental Impacts ................................................................ 33.4 Consolidated Performance Criteria and Constraints .................................................... 33.5 Safety Analysis ................................................................ 3
4.0 OTHER INSTRUCTIONS ................................................................ 34.1 Sequence Recommended for Performing Multiple Investigations ................................ 34.2 Data Submittals (YAP-SIII.3Q) ................................................................ 44.3 Sample Collection ................................................................ 54.4 Computer Software ................................................................ 5
5.0 REFERENCE TO SCP COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN CONSIDEREDRELATIVE TO INVESTIGATION(S) (YAP-30.3) ................................................................ 6
6.0 REFERENCES TO DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ................................................................ 6
7.0 COST AND SCHEDULE DATA ................................................................ 7
8.0 QA PREPARATION ................................................................ 78.1 Closure of QA Concerns ............................................................... 78.2 Q-List ItemslActivities ................................................................ 7
9.0 READINESS REVIEW ................................................................ 7
ATTACHMENT 1A:
ATTACHMENT IB:
ATTACHMENT 2:ATTACHMENT 3A:
ATTACHMENT 3B:
ATTACHMENT 4:
COMMON FACILITY PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ANDCONSTRAINTS FOR HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE ESF ........... 8TEST PARAMETERS DERIVED FROM SCPB FORHYDROCHEMISTRY EXPERIMENTS IN THE ESF .............................. 12HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS SCHEDULE PLANNING BASIS ........... 13COMMON FACILITY PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ANDCONSTRAINTS FOR MATRIX HYDROLOGIC PROPERTIESTESTING............................................................................................... 14TEST PARAMETERS DERIVED FROM SCPB ACTIVITY8.3.1.2.2.3 .............................................. 17MATRIX HYDROLOGIC PROPERTIES TESTING SCHEDULEPLANNING BASIS .............................................. 18
TPP 92-12, HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Rev. 3
EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACIUTY Page 2 of 18
1.0 LIST OF STUDY PLANS OR SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION PLANS USED INSCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION
The following are controlled Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project (YMP)documents that describe scientific plans for hydrochemistry tests in theExploratory Studies Facility (ESF). Information currently provided in this testplanning package (TPP) is limited to the following study plans: 8.3.1.2.2.4(Characterization of the Yucca Mountain Unsaturated Zone in the ExploratoryStudies Facility), and 8.3.1.2.2.3.1 (Matrix Hydrologic Properties Testing).
2.0 WORK SCOPE
The purpose of the Hydrochemistry tests is to determine the chemicalcomposition, reactive mechanisms, and age of water and gas in pores, fractures,and perched-water zones within the unsaturated tuffs accessible from the ESFand/or affiliated boreholes. The ESF will provide access for the collection of gas,rock, and fracture-water samples which are required in order to obtain theinformation needed to provide input to site characterization.
3.0 INVESTIGATIONS CONTROLS
Section 3.0 References:
R3.1 "Exploratory Studies Facility Design Requirements, Appendix B, SectionB-2.2.10, "Hydrochemistry Tests in the Exploratory Studies Facility,"YMP/CM-0019, Rev. 712192.
R3.2 "Exploratory Studies Facility Design Requirements, Appendix B, Section8-2.2.2, Matrix Hydrologic Properties Testing in the Exploratory StudiesFacility," YMP/CM-0019, Rev. 7/2192.
R3.3 Letter: Statton to Canepa, "Consolidated Test Interference Evaluation,Waste Isolation Evaluation, and SCA Comments Specific to North RampAlcove #1 Construction and Associated Testing in the ExploratoryStudies Facility (ESF)," SCP: 8.3.1.2.2.4.4 and 8.3.1.2.2.4.8," datedSeptember 7, 1993, LV.SC.BWD.9/93-243.
R3.4 Letter: Shephard to Elkins, "Sensitivity Evaluations of UndergroundWater Movement Study," dated September 2, 1993.
R3.5 Memorandum: Dyer to File, "Approval of Lithium Bromide and RelatedControls for Use as the Tracer in Underground Construction Water at theExploratory Studies Facility (ESF)," RSED:JRD-3560, dated April 1,1993.
R3.6 Letter: Edwards to Oliver, "Planning Information for Study Plan8.3.1.2.2.4 (Hydrochemistry Tests in the Exploratory Studies Facility),"dated September 14, 1993.
TPP 92-12HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Rev. 3EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY Page 3 of 18
R3.7 Letter: Dixon to Simecka, 'Amended Approval of Land Access andEnvironmental Compliance for Field Work Involving Exploratory StudiesFacility (ESF) Construction of Package 1A (92-015.14) (SCP: N/A),"dated May 24, 1994.
The following controls are based on section references, including evaluations toaddress potential test interference and waste isolation impacts (including planneduse of tracers, fluids, and materials) and input from principal investigators (PIs).These controls supplement or amend existing performance criteria andconstraints found in Appendix B of reference R2.1.
3.1 Interference
Clarification of an existing constraint is required; see Attachments 1Aand 3A.
3.2 Impacts to Waste Isolation
No modifications to existing performance criteria or constraints arerequired.
3.3 Environmental Impacts
No modifications to existing performance criteria or constraints arerequired. All work shall be done in accordance with Reference R3.7.
3.4 Consolidated Performance Criteria and Constraints
See Attachments 1A and 3A for a list of consolidated test-specificperformance criteria and constraints.
n 5 Safety Analysis
Potential environmental, safety, and health concerns regarding the interactionsbetween the test activities and construction activities are addressed by safetyanalyses, written and transmitted to the ESF TCO under official memorandum.The ESF TCO safety representative compiles this information and provides anoverview for each specific test. A reference to the ESF TCO safety analysis ismade in the JP for the test(s) to be conducted. A new safety analysis isprepared each time workscope is changed or modified. A copy of each safetyanalysis is maintained by the ESF TCO.
4.0 OTHER INSTRUCTIONS
4.1 Sequence Recommended for Performing Multiple Investigations
Hydrochemistry Tests in the ESF and Matrix Hydrologic Properties Testing willutilize core samples from drill holes drilled for Radial Borehole Tests in the
TPP 92-12HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Rev. 3EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY Page 4 of 18
ESF and Hydrologic Properties of Major Faults Encountered in the ESF. Thecore produced from these boreholes will be the primary source of informationfor Hydrochemistry Tests in the ESF and Matrix Hydrologic Properties Testing,the second priority will be sampling in boreholes for the Hydrochemistry Tests.Additional borehole sampling will then be conducted for Radial BoreholeTesting or Hydrologic Properties of Major Faults Encountered in the ESFdepending on the testing location.
4.2 Data Submittals (YAP-SIII.3Q)
Participants are responsible for collection, management, and submittal of data,and for compliance with Project and participant plans and procedures asdescribed in applicable study plans. See Attachment 1 "Overview of DataRequirements."
All transfers of data between YMP participants, submittal of data to the YMPdatabase, or transfer of data to outside parties shall be conducted inaccordance with YAP-SIII.3Q "Control and Transfer of Technical Data on theYucca Mountain Site Characterization Project" and other applicable plans andprocedures.
Key data to be obtained are described in the referenced study plans; thisincludes, but is not limited to, pneumatic and hydraulic permeabilitymeasurements, porosity and anisotropy analyses of major faults and faultzones. Long-term monitoring for vertical flow of gas, water, and vapor, as wellas tracer tests to estimate tortuosity and effective porosity of major faults andfault zones.
Overview of Data Requirements: (this list provides at a minimum activities thatmay provide records produced from Hydrochemistry Tests in the ESF).
Calibration Records, (this includes specific equipment or instrumentsutilized by the constructor, PI, and all other supporting participants). Itis the responsibility of the user of the equipment to identify the need tocalibrate equipment, follow an approved calibration procedure, anddocument the calibration in accordance with project and participantprocedures.
Verification Records, (if verification plan(s) are utilized by the PI,constructor, or support participant, it is their responsibility to identify thecriteria for which a verification plan is to be conducted, follow theverification plan, and submit documentation showing reports that theverification plan was conducted.
Data Collection Records, (this includes but is not limited to pneumaticand hydraulic permeability measurements, porosity and anisotropyanalyses of major faults and fault zones, long-term monitoring forvertical flow of gas, water, or vapor, and tracer tests to estimate
TPP 92-12HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Rev. 3EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY Page of 18
tortuosity and effective porosity of major faults and fault zones or othertechnical information resulting from testing and analyses from theHydrochemistry Tests in the ESF.
Construction Records, (records generated during constructionoperations facilitating conducting Hydrochemistry Tests in the ESF.These records are generated by the constructor, and may include butnot be limited to water usage for construction, amount of tracer used inwater for construction, amount of tracer used in drilling operations, typeof excavation, industrial hygiene measurements and surveymeasurements.
4.3 Sample Collection
Core samples collected from boreholes drilled for Hydrologic Properties ofMajor Faults Encountered in the ESF or Radial Borehole Tests in the ESF willbe utilized by the Hydrochemistry Tests in the ESF activity and by the MatrixHydrologic Properties Testing Activity (8.3.1.2.2.3.1). All core samples will becollected according to Civilian Radioactive Waste Management SystemManagement & Operating Contractor Work Instruction WI-DS-001 FieldLogging, Handling, and Documenting Borehole Samples," unless otherwisedirected by an approved Field Packaging Approval Form from YAP-SIl.1Q"Submittal, Review, and Approval of Requests for Yucca Mountain SiteCharacterization Project Geologic Specimens." Specimen Removal Requestforms will be completed and submitted to the Sample Overview Committee forapproval prior to drilling at each major faults test location. Specific samplinginstructions will be attached to a Field Packaging Approval form listing detailedsample handling and packaging instructions for each borehole.
4.4 Computer Software
All computer software data measurement equipment will be connected todataloggers for storing the gasfiow, pressure, temperature, water potential andreal time data. Programs to record this data are written using the dataloggermanufacturers software designed to work with the dataloggers's hardwiredsampling programs. Because of the variability in the test material and differenttest methods, the programs may require modifications for each test andborehole. The stored data will be downloaded to field computers; then diskfiles will be made. Additional software that will be used may include the latestversion of WordPerfect 5.1 and Quatro Pro 4.0. Computer software invokedusing procedure shall be documented in accordance with QMP-3.03 orrecorded in the Pi's scientific notebook.
TPP 92-12HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Rev. 3EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY Page 6 of 18
5.0 REFERENCE TO SCP COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED RELATIVETO INVESTIGATION(S) (YAP-30.3)
Section 5.0 References:
R5.1 Letter: Statton to Canepa, "Consolidated Test Interference Evaluation, WasteIsolation Evaluation, and SCA Comments Specific to North Ramp Alcove #1Construction and Associated Testing in the Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF),"SCP: 8.3.1.2.2.4.4 and 8.3.1.2.2.4.8," dated September 7, 1993,LV.SC.BWD.9/93-243.
No open constraints or commitments associated with the Site Characterization Plan(SCP) have been identified for this activity.
6.0 REFERENCES TO DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Section 6.0 References:
R6.1 "Exploratory Studies Facility Design Requirements," Sections 1.2.6.2 through1.2.6.9 of YMP/CM-0019, Rev. 7/2/92.
R6.2 "Exploratory Studies Facility Technical Baseline," YMP/CM-0016, Rev.5/12194.
R6.3 Memorandum, Elkins to Segrest, Transmittal of Design and Test-RelatedInformation for Design and Construction of ESF North Ramp (Design Package2C)," LA-EES-13-LV-03-94-026, dated March 23, 1994.
Functional requirements, performance criteria, and constraints in Sections 1.2.6.2through 1.2.6.9 of YMP/CM-0019, Rev. 7/2/92 provide the basis and control for thecommon facility design and its interfaces with ESF testing. Requirements areimplemented under the formal ESF Title 11 design, consistent with ESF technicalbaseline.
YMP/CM-0019 establishes the common facility design basis; consolidatedperformance criteria and constraints (Attachments 1A and 3A) are consistent with, anddo not require alteration of the current ESF design.
Development of test-specific construction specifications and drawings is not requiredfor this activity.
TPP 92-12HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THEEXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
Rev. 3Page 7 of 18
7.0 COST AND SCHEDULE DATA
USGS
USGS
WB21.2.3.3.1.2.4
1.2.3.3. 1.2.3
P&S AccountOG33124E97
OG33123A96
Percolation in theUnsaturated Zone
Percolation in theUnsaturated Zone
See Attachments 2 and 4 (illustrations) for further detail on the cost and scheduleplanning basis. The task dates and estimated durations are based on current designand construction strategies. These tasks, dates, and durations are subject to change.Changes will be controlled through the Project planning basis and reflected inapplicable job packages or approved Project schedules.
8.0 QA PREPARATION
8.1 Closure of QA Concerns
No QA concerns have been identified.
8.2 Q-List Items/Activities
General guidance for application of the Quality Assurance Requirements andDescription (QARD, DOE/RW/0333P) to site characterization activities is provided bythe USGS in conjunction with the YMSCO Q-List, YMP/90-55. The quality affectingelements for this activity are limited to data and samples collected in support of StudyPlans listed in section 1.0.
The following quality assurance grading reports (QAGR) associated with the testingactivities have been approved:
EarticpantUSGS
QAGRG1233124 1.2.3.3
SubjectChar of YM Pere in the Unsat Zone-ESF Study
USGS G1233123 1.2.3.3 Char of YM Perc in the UnsatZone-ESF Study
9.0 READINESS REVIEW
The Assistant Manager for Scientific Programs determined that a readiness review isnot required.
TPP 92-12 Attachment 1AHYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Page 8 of 18EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
ATTACHMENT 1ACOMMON FACILITY PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND CONSTRAINTS FOR
HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
Attachment 1 References:
A.1 "Exploratory Studies Facility Design Requirements, "Appendix B, Section B-2.2.10,"Hydrochemistry Tests in the Exploratory Studies Facility," YMP/CM-0019, Rev. 7/2/92.
A.2 YMP/TPP 91-5, Rev. 0, "Preliminary Test Planning Package for Support of Pre-Title IIDesign Studies; Planned Exploratory Studies Facility Tests."
A.3 Letter: Statton to Canepa, "Consolidated Test Interference Evaluation, Waste IsolationEvaluation, and SCA Comments Specific to North Ramp Alcove #1 Construction andAssociated Testing in the Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF)," SCP: 8.3.1.2.2.4.4 and8.3.1.2.2.4.8," dated September 7,1993, LV.SC.BWD.9/93-243.
A.4 Letter: Shephard to Elkins, "Sensitivity Evaluations of Underground Water MovementStudy," dated September 2, 1993.
A.5 Memorandum: Dyer to File, "Approval of Lithium Bromide and Related Controls for Useas the Tracer in Underground Construction Water at the Exploratory Studies Facility(ESF)," RSED:JRD-3560, dated April 1, 1993.
A.6 Letter: Edwards to Oliver, "Planning Information for Study Plan 8.3.1.2.2.4(Hydrochemistry Tests in the Exploratory Studies Facility)," dated September 14, 1993.
A.7 Letter: Edwards to Elkins, "Modifications to Core Sampling Instructions forHydrochemistry Tests in the Exploratory Studies Facility North Ramp Alcove #1," datedFebruary 25, 1994.
A consolidated list of performance criteria and constraints, derived from section references andfocused on specific testing needs for this phase of the activity, is found below. Appendix B of theESFDR provided a verbatim statement of applicable performance criteria and constraints for thisESF testing activity. Test Planning Package 91-5 provided the controlled basis for testingactivities planning based on the selected Alternatives Study ESF facility configuration.Reference A.3 provided the basis for constraints to address potential impacts to waste isolationand test interference. References A.4 and A.5 along with a review of the study plan by the LosAlamos National Laboratory Test Coordination Office, provided the basis for additional designand test-related information. Note: performance criteria and constraints follow the formatestablished in reference A.1. All supplemental performance criteria and constraints areidentified by italicized text.
The following performance criteria and constraints represent the controlled requirements basisfor tests to be conducted in the Exploratory Studies Facility. Not all portions of these tests will beconducted at all locations; however all tests will be conducted in a manner consistent with theserequirements. Test requirements will be implemented through job packages and referenceddesign specifications drawings, and controlled procedures. Compliance with test requirementswill be demonstrated through records submissions and reporting requirements.
TPP 92-12 Attachment IA.HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Page 9 of 18EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
Performance Criteria (Reference A. 1: Section B-2.2.10)
Functional Requirements
1 . Provide the facility design and operational flexibility to perform the HydrochemistryTest.
Performance Criteria
1 a. Core and gas samples will be required from the following locations:
(i). All Radial Borehole Test holes.
(ii). Many of the Bulk Permeability Test holes.
(a) Designated Bulk Permeability Test holes.
(iii). Many of the Major Faults Test holes.
(a) Designated Hydrologic Properties of Major Faults Encountered in theESF boreholes.
(iv). From additional coreholes drilled specifically for the Hydrochemistry test toprovide gas and core samples from locations not satisfied by the abovetests locations. These may include 2 or 3 additional locations in the TivaCanyon welded hydrogeologic unit, and 2 additional locations in theTopopah Spring hydrogeologic unit, the zeolitic and vitric facies of the CalicoHills nonwelded hydrogeologic units, and the bedded tuff of the Paintbrushhydrogeologic unit. This also may include any wet areas, any unanticipatedgeologic formation encountered during ESF construction, and coreholescored in three different orientations from one alcove in each of the weldedunits. All of the coreholes will be 61mm in diameter (HQ), and dry drilled toa depth of about 30 meters.
(a) From additional coreholes drilled specifically for the Hydrochemistrytest to provide gas and core samples from location not satisfied bythe above tests locations. These may include 2 or 3 additionallocations in the Tiva Canyon welded hydrogeologic unit, and 2additional locations in the Topopah Spring hydrogeologic unit, thezeolitic and virtric facies of the Calico Hills nonwelded hydrogeologicunits, and the bedded tuff of the Paintbrush hydrogeologic unit. Thisalso may include any wet areas, any unanticipated geologicformation encountered during ESF north ramp or alcoveconstruction, and coreholes cored in three different orientations fromone alcove in each of the welded units. All of the coreholes will be61 mm (2.4 in) in diameter (HQ-3), and dry drilled to a depth of about30 meters (98.4 ft).
TPP 92-12 Attachment 1AHYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Page 10 of aEXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
l b. Long-term gas sampling will occur 2 times per year for a period of at least 3 years.
i. Sampling intervals will be determined by the PI.
ii. Sampling will take approximately 2 to 4 weeks or as needed by the P.
Ic. Gas samples will be provided from short-term boreholes drilled from the drift in aminimum of 2 locations in each hydrogeologic unit as soon as possible afterexcavation. Additionally, it may be necessary to provide short-term boreholes fromalcoves at each of the locations listed in a, lb, Ic, and Id (above). Informationobtained from the short-term boreholes drilled from the drift will help determine thenecessity for, and depth of, the alcove short-term boreholes.
i. Short-term boreholes consist of 1-2 meter (3-6.5 ft) boreholes that are drydrilled to obtain gas samples at locations determined by the P.
ii. Additionally, it may be necessary to provide short-term boreholes fromalcoves at each of the locations listed in a (i), (ii), and (iv) above.
Id. Alcoves may be required at each gas sampling location as necessary to provide atleast 1.8 by 2.4 meter space out of the traffic area for gas sampling equipment.
le. Standard 1 IOV power, fighting, and communications will be adequate. Testing willrequire that compressed air (345kPa) be available to inflate the packers.
If. Samples of all traced water used at the ESF shall be provided for chemical analysisfrom all water system taps using procedures to be determined.
i. Samples will be obtained at the request of the P.
1g. Access must be provided to the test location collar on a continuing periodic basisfor gas sample collection.
i. Long-term access to short (1-2 m [3-6.5 ft) holes is not required.
1 h. A location must be provided for short-term core storage. The location should be atleast 3 by 3 by 2.4 meters, out of traffic areas, and the temperature and humidityshould not fluctuate by more than I1 degrees Celsius or 20% relative humidity.
i. The location should be at least m x 0.5m x 0.5m (3 x 1.5 x 1.5 ft) withtemperature monitoring capabilities.
i. The temperature of the core shall be maintained between 20 and 18° C(350 to 64° F) if the core barrel has to be stored underground, and withinone hour upon opening the core barrel for core staging and packaging.
i. The P1 will provide core handling and storage instructions for each testlocation pertaining to this activity.
TPP 92-12 Attachment IAHYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Page II of 1EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
iv. Core sample weights, when required, shall be recorded to the nearest 0.01grams. The required accuracy for core sample weights taken at theSample Management Facility is ± 0.03 grams, the required accuracy forcore sample weights taken in the field is + 0. 05 grams.
1 i. At this time the precise locations of the test sites are unknown. As the driftingprogresses and contacts, faults, wet areas, etc. are determined the locations willbe defined. Due to the many unknowns it is imperative that a great deal offlexibility be maintained in the test site selection.
1j. During the long-term gas sampling, no other hydrologic testing should be donewithin about 15 meters of the sampling intervals.
(i) During long term gas sampling, no other hydrologic testing is to be donewithin approximately 15 meters (49 ft), unless test interference issues areaddressed including concurrence from the ESF TCO and the P1(s).
Constraints (Reference A. 1: Section B-2.2.10)
A. Chemically trace all water used at the ESF.
L. Water used in construction will be chemically tagged with lithium bromide,or other approved tracer.
B. Chemically trace all gases used for drilling or testing in the ESF.
i. Short (1-2 m [3-6.5 ft) boreholes do not require chemical tagging of thecompressed air stream.
C. Collect samples from all concrete, grouts, and other liquid construction materialsas required by the ESF Fluid/Material/Tracer System Plan.
i. Samples will be obtained at the request of the PI.
D. Long-term monitoring sites can be postponed up to one-half year after excavationas long as alcoves and coreholes are not constructed.
E. Short-term boreholes must be drilled within 4-5 days after excavation of a drift oralcove.
i. Short (1-2 m (3-6.5 flu) term boreholes should be drilled within 1-2 daysafter excavation of selected round in drill and blast construction of alcoves.
TPP 92-12 Attachment IBHYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Page 12 of 18EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
ATTACHMENT BTEST PARAMETERS DERIVED FROM SCPB FOR HYDROCHEMISTRY
EXPERIMENTS IN THE EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
Objectives
Performance Criteria Specifically Regarding Test Expectations
la. Gas Sampling will be performed in selected boreholes by the Pi utilizingapproved procedures to be used for age dating.
1 b. Gas samples will be collected by the Pi from each borehole location for the purposeof determining gas chemistry of the rock matrix.
I c. Measurements will be performed on core samples by the Pi collected fromboreholes for Radial Borehole Tests in the ESF or Hydrologic Properties of MajorFaults Encountered in the ESF in order to obtain the age of groundwater(porewater) from each borehole test location.
1 d. Anion and cation concentrations will be determined by the Pi utilizing core samplescollected from boreholes for Radial Borehole Tests in the ESF or HydrologicProperties of Major Faults Encountered in the ESF.
TPP 2-12I4YDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THEEXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
Attachment 2Page 13 of 18
Hydrochemistry Tests Schedule Planning BasisTPP 92-12
Noith Ramp Al0ve
10 Taut Name Our SttI JP 2-20 CONSTRUCTON CTlVrTY 1141d 41/93
2 Start Nodh Ramp Tunnel Conabiton C 4S3
3 Slast o TM Tunne Construction Od 27/94
4 Startr Tunel Construction 123d 421
5 Alcove ii Constructin 8d S27/93
6 Ramps & Main Tunnet Construction ?Sd 1244
7 Aloove 82 Construon (Bow Ridge Fu Alcove) 28d 227SS
8 Alcove 2 Dorehol Diling (JP 9S5-1) 25d 4159$
9 Alcove 3 Construction (Coac Yucca Mountain Tun Alcove) 2d 73195
10 Allove 83 Borehole ODring (IP 5.1) 24d 9195
11 Acowve 4 Construction Cornact Topoph Spring Capock Alcove) 2d 1W10IO95
12 Alcove 4 Borehole DrlNg (JP 95- 1 25d I1 2095
13 Alcove 65 Constnjction (Dril Hole Wash Alcove) 2d 21196
14 Alcove *S Borehole Oriling (JP 95-1) 40d 3n2196
15 North Ramp Elenson (Contingency) 109d 4/196
27 TEST UPLEUENTAllON -ESF HYDROCHEMISTRY TEST)NG 519d 1/119
28 Test nplemenbton -Dlscrte 519d 5lC95
29 USGS Test Implementation 519d 5/S15
30 Sow Ridge FI Alcove (Alcove r2 260d 51W95
31 Contact Yucca Mountain Tult Alcove (Alcove 03) 260d 11 /J95
Contact Topopai Spring Caprock Alcove (Alcove 04) 260d 11121/95
Ddin Hole Wash Alcove (Alcove ES) 260d 517/96
3 REECoIRSN Fled Survey Proceseing 511d 5/1s
35 Bow Ridge Feut Alcove (Alcove 62) 26d 5/119S
36 Contact Yucca Mountain Tuft Alcove (Alcove 03) 260d 1211J/95
37 Contact Topopah Spring Caprock Alcove (Alcove 04) 260d 11/1219S
38 Ont Hole Wash Alcove (Alcove 65) 260d 517/96
39 REECo Test Consrucilon Procurement 519d SfO/9
40 Bow Ridge Fault Alcove (lOve .2) 2150d Sn1095
41 Contact Yucca Mountain Tuft Alcove (Alcove 3) 260d 1tY11195
42 Contact Topopah Spin Caprad Alcove (Alcove 4) 260d 111 f195
43 Odill Hole Wash Alcove (Alcove ) 260d 57S6
44 Test hplementation -Matis Support St1d 5M01W
45 tos Aamos TCO Management A Planning 51s9d snu9
46 Los Alamo. TCO ESF est Managemenl 519d snos
47 EG&G Photographic Services S1d 5/W5
48 MU iSAIC Sample Management Facility 519d 5/119S
49 M&SAIC ODring Support s1d 510'9
so UlNL Geoptsical Logging s1d sn195
Si CRwY/S MO Proect Conrol Suppot 519d SnOIss
52 TEST MOITORING -ESF HYOROCHEMISTRY TESTING 520d M5M
53 Test Monitoring. 0srefta 520d 5/1/9
54 USGS Test Montoring 2d 6
55 Test Monibring -Matrix Support S20d 5//9
-1 1995 I 1996 _ 1997 I04 101i2
,Stf dNI I-~,!l AdStart of Noets Ram Tunne Cntulr
I * Sta of TBw Tunnal
0R641 iOR61 lI~OR41 _ _
V
Constiuction
A
1OR64
R: J OR"4i C OR33124
I. A
la OR33124II I
loE ORE
i. ll OR3124I:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I: 1 0 OR644
i ' I X OR V3124i. ! E
- ~~~-YT 1 v
go1124
t> G3124I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- ^ : -
MkM397
T
1139
t32
VV I
OR33124
Cfa
33124
t324
'V Va 0A397
a OASIS
a OE761
a 0351
a 0T3522
a 01.3B3
M TR921
S0 : -
T V
= -: : -~~V
W.32124
-VTLot Mlamos TCO ESF Test Manageen 520d SW%
OCAtiG
0A616 a
TI1ill Em-
CRWMS M&O latl ted Data System 520d 1 S6
Proeect H n Task milestone Checked .d
Date: 12/1294 Proress Simvnary -- V Approved Dy
IODlP1JECTlESFWORKESF\HYDROCHM TPP1T92 2TR3.MPP ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY
TPP 92-12 Attachment 3A,HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Page 14 of 18EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
ATTACHMENT 3ACOMMON FACILITY PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND CONSTRAINTS FOR
MATRIX HYDROLOGIC PROPERTIES TESTING
Attachment 3A References:
B.1 "Exploratory Studies Facility Design Requirements, "Appendix B Section B-2.2.2, "MatrixHydrologic Properties Testing," YMP/CM-001 9, Rev. 712/92.
B.2 YMP/TPP 91-5, Rev. 0, "Preliminary Test Planning Package for Support of Pre-Title II DesignStudies; Planned Exploratory Studies Facility Tests."
B.3 Letter: Statton to Canepa, "Consolidated Test Interface Evaluation, Waste Isolation Evaluation,and SCA Comments Specific to North Ramp Alcove #1 Construction and Associated Testing inthe Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF)," SCP: 8.3.1.2.2.4.4 and 8.3.1.2.2.4.8," dated September 7,1993, LV.SC.BWD.9193-243.
B.4 Letter: Shephard to Elkins, "Sensitivity Evaluations of Underground Water Movement Study,"dated September 2, 1993.
B.5 Memorandum: Dyer to File, "Approval of Lithium Bromide and Related Controls for Use as theTracer in Underground Construction Water at the Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF),"RSED:JRD-3560, dated April 1, 1993.
B.6 Letter: Edwards to Oliver, "Planning Information for Hydrologic Properties of Major Faults in theExploratory Studies Facility (ESF) North Ramp Alcove #2 dated October 18, 1994.
A consolidated list of performance criteria and constraints, derived from section references and focusedon specific testing needs for this phase of the activity, is found below. Appendix B of the ESFDRprovided a verbatim statement of applicable performance criteria and constraints for this ESF testingactivity. Test Planning Package 91-5 provided the controlled basis for testing activities planning basedon the selected Alternatives Study ESF facility configuration. Reference B.3 provided the basis forconstraints to address potential impacts to waste isolation and test interference. References B.4 andB.5 along with a review of the study plan by the Los Alamos National Laboratory Test CoordinationOffice, provided the basis for additional design and test-related information. Note: performance criteriaand constraints follow the format established in reference B.1. All supplemental performance criteriaand constraints are identified by italicized text.
The following performance criteria and constraints represent the controlled requirements basis for teststo be conducted in the Exploratory Studies Facility. Not all portions of these tests will be conducted atall locations; however all tests will be conducted in a manner consistent with these requirements. Testrequirements will be implemented through job packages and referenced design specificationsdrawings, and controlled procedures.
Compliance with test requirements will be demonstrated through records submissions and reportingrequirements.
TPP 92-12 Attachment 3AHYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Page 15 ofISEXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
Performance Criteria (Reference B.1: Section B-2.2.2)
Functional Requirements
1. Provide the facility design and the operational flexibility to perform the sample collection.
Performance Criteria
la. Samples will be required from all lithologic units penetrated by the ESF. Samplesadjacent to lithologic contacts and from bedded intervals are of particular importance.Small alcoves, large enough for a core rig, may be required if boreholes are drilledspecifically to collect samples for this test. If possible, core samples will be collected fromboreholes drilled for other testing purposes (other PIs boreholes), provided that dry-drillingtechniques are employed. Additional sampling may be required, either boreholes or blocksamples, to provide samples from all the lithologic units penetrated by the ESF.
(i) Matrix Hydrologic Properties Testing will utilize portions of the core from theHydrochemistry Tests in the ESF activity.
1b. Boreholes cored specifically for this test should be HQ3-sized boreholes, deep enough toretrieve natural-state samples, oriented approximately horizontal (this is not critical), anddrilled dry (air as the circulating fluid).
(i) Agreement from the PIs for Hydrochemistry Tests in the ESF, Radial Borehole Testsin the ESF, and Hydrologic Properties of Major Faults Encountered in the ESF willbe reached prior to any drilling of new boreholes specific for Matrix HydrologicProperties Testing in order to maximize testing efforts from related tests.
Ic. There are currently no plans to instrument boreholes drilled specifically to collect samplesfor this test. No data collection equipment will be needed in the ESF.
Id. The placement of matrix hydrologic properties boreholes is flexible where thick,homogeneous units are being sampled. At lithologic contacts and in bedded units, theremay be less sample flexibility. Orientations of the boreholes is flexible, to be determinedby the type of units being sampled.
le. Standard ESF utilities are required for this test.
if. Ramp and drift walls may need to be sampled as soon as they are excavated. Thesamples would be block samples or small core plugs, preferably taken by the USGS ordesignated representatives. Long-term access to drill boreholes and sample ramp anddrift walls from 6 months to possibly years may be required.
Constraints (Reference B.I: Section B-2.2.2)
A. The matrix hydrologic properties testing will provide data on in situ hydrologic conditions toother Ps; providing background information for boreholes that are to be instrumented formonitoring changes in the rock surrounding the ESF. In some cases, the data provided fromthis test will be needed before instruments are placed in the monitoring boreholes.
TPP 92-12 Attachment 3AHYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Page 16 of 1EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
B. Where practicable, core samples for this test shall be collected from boreholes drilled for otherESF tests, provided that the boreholes are drilled dry.
(i) Special requirements for core sample processing may exist, including time constraintswhen core is removed from the core barrel and special packaging containers may beutilized. This information will be supplied by the Pi through the ESF TCO submitted tothe SOC for approval.
C. No IDS requirements are foreseen at this time.
D. This test requires in situ samples. The Pi or his designated representative will determinewhere the samples should be collected from to minimize the impact caused by any wet-drillingoperation. This will ensure uncontaminated samples. No interference envelope is required.
E. Dry drilling is required for this test. Block samples, created by drill-and-blast methods, shouldbe collected prior to significant use of water for dust control. Minimal water may be used indrilling the blast holes.
TPP 92-12 Attachment 3BHYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THE Page 17 of 18EXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
ATTACHMENT 3BTEST PARAMETERS DERIVED FROM SCPB ACTIVITY 8.3.1.2.2.3
(MATRIX HYDROLOGIC PROPERTIES TESTING)
Objectives
Performance Criteria Specifically Regarding Test Expectations
la. Density measurements will be performed in order to obtain bulk and grain densities forthe rock matrix at each borehole location.
lb. Porosity measurements will be made on core samples by the Pi in order to assist inthe development of hydrologic models.
Ic. Water contents will be measured at fault zones which will enable the PI to calculateretention curves for the rock matrix.
TPP 92-12HYDROCHEMISTRY TESTS IN THEEXPLORATORY STUDIES FACILITY
Attachment 4Page la of 18
Matrix Hydrologic Properties Testing Schedule Planning BasisTPP 92-12
Not Rp Alcovs
IS.rtrn9 i it I~OS I Ad |-Z 1 s
I.-U" M,
I!, M~i..1 l AwbsT U.iIUnAP111r l li9
2 Star ot Noeth Ramp Tumid Constuction O 4a
3 Shrt o TS Tuiud Constuction Od V27/4
4 Starbe Turnn Consudtion 123d Airm
S Aboe *1 Couction 38d gt27n3
e Fans 4, Main Tunnel Consirucion 755d 112494
7 Alcov* 02 Construcon (Bow Ridge Falt Alcove) 2Bd 2127/95
a Acove 2 Borehole ODwing (JP 95-1) 25d 4N9S
S Aco 3 Construction (Drill Hde Wash Alcove) 28d 7Q1195
10 Aove 3 Borehole Dng (JP 24d V7J
11 Alcove 4 Constuction (Contac Topopah Sprng Caprock Alcove) 28d tOf1lO9S
12 Alove U4 Borehole i"ing iP951 25d 1102019
13 Alove S Construction (Cr Hole Wash Above) 28d 2196
1 4 Alove IS Borehole Oing (JP 9W-I) 40d 3ii 6
15 North Ramp Ertension (Contingency) lO9d 411/96
2 TEST IMPLEMENTATION -ESF MATRIX HYDROLOGIC TESTING SId sn 0195
27 Test mplementaton -DIscree 19d s0109S
25 USGS Test Implementation 519d 51O0S5
29 Bow Ridge Fait Alcove (Alcove 02) 260d 510'95
30 contact Yucca Mountain Tul Alcove (Alcove 33) 260d lOIU9S
31 Contact Topopah Spring Caprock Alcove (Alcove 94) 260d 1/21/95
Drll Hole Wash Alcove (Above OS) 260d 57196
REECo/RSN Field Survey a Processing 519d SI0195
34 Bow Ridge Fait Alcove (Alcove 92) 260d YlOiS
35 Contact Yucca Mountain Tuff Alcove (Alcove 83) 260d IOl19S
36 Contact Topopah Spring Caprock Alcove (Alcove 94) 260d 11/21195
37 Drill Hole Wash Alcove (Alcove NS) 260d SJ7796
38 REECo Test Conetruction A Procurement 19d S/10/95
39 Bow Ridge Fi Alcove (Alove 323 260d S1t0/S
40 Contact Yucca Mountain Tul Alove (Alcove 83) 260d 1011119S
41 Corlact Topopah Spring Captick Alove (Alove 0U) 260d 1 1/2195
42 .M Hole Wash Alcove (Acove 85) 260d 57/96
43 Tt Iplementation -Hatrbx Support 51d 5 NS9
44 Los Alamos TOO Management & Pning 519d 51095
45 Los Alamos TCO ESF Test Management S9id S/O95
46 EG&G Piotogsaphic Services S19d 5195
47 TiUSS Samle Management Facility S19d 510195
48 LLNI Geophysical Logging 519d 51 y95
49 CRiUS MAO Projec Contrd Support Slid S/19
50 TEST MONITORING -ESF MATRIX HYDROLOGC TESTING 520d S11196
S1 Test Monlodng - iscre 520l 1d %W9
52 USGS Test Monitoring 520d 5196
53 Test Montdrting - Matrix Support 520d 5A6
54 Los Alamos TOG ESF Test Manageen 520d 58/96
Stait of Norimp Tdnt~osnon
* ar t fTOM Tunnel Centnac
O RS41 , l
V
FAM OR642
,.b0R644 1. M OR RE
*t 0CR33124
* 011644
, 011644
i, X O3 R33124
i i
i e V
V . V-
V IV
OG33124,
OG33124
I p., // OG33124
C5R397
*A' "'i- ' 'R 01l397
* ~ ~~ CR397
itiIII
I ORC33124 2
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I90=301, 0433124
_ 1 ~OR33124i ~~~OR3t3lt24
V
a 0A397
aOASIS
a OE761
B CT35
a OUB
FA TR921
-wV V
!ICG312
V -
4 V1110 MR,
V-
V
V
CA616
CRWMS M&O Integrated Daa System 520d 5086 684
Pie:t Matik Hydfogic Pioperlies Task 's, /,4 / MitOene * Checked Bms rxi-
Oli: 112294 Progress Sunary T V Approved O B -y
D:WEP Rt ECTNESWOR\C.ESF\ATRICTPMMTRIXTPO.MPP ADMIMSTRATIVE USE OLY
PLANS AND PROCEDURES DEPARTME-TAPPROVED DELIVERABLE TRANSMITAL -
DATE: May 15, 199 2t!J JEZ:slm:0036137ATO: D. R. Williams ' WBS #1.2.9.3.3FROM: Judith E. Zimmerman, Manager QA: N/A
Plans and Procedures Department
Enclosed is a copy of the approved DARs for OBB02C & OBB03C, Milestone Repbrt for Surface Geophysics. heapproval of this deliverable closes DAR #s 0036A & 0037A.
PPD will file a record package associated with these DARs in the Records Processing Center.
If you have any questions regarding the information contained herein or concerns about the document coordinationprocess, please call Sandi Moore, PPD Production Coordinator at 794-5327 or May Ann Nusbaum at 794-5325.
Enclosures:
1. Copy of DAR #s 0036A & 0037A2. Copy of completed Deliverable Package
I
- - .- . -- . - It. 1, -V ;- 4 � - � A - - �#Vc- r . , -
YMP.10BR4 YUCCA MOUNTAIN SITE CHARACTERIZATION PROJECT of
04103/95 DOCUMENT ACTION REQUEST PPD° '' °fo.
(DAR) OAR Na2G3 6 7 As D gnod: 3 /.
Signatures on tis document apresent s6gnoa acknowledgement that h opptlodble procedure has been rod. understood. endcompiled with.
SECTION I - ACTION REQUEST1. DOCUMENT TITLE: 2. CURRENT COCUMENT NO.: S. REViICN: Icuent)
Surface Based Geophysical Testing O -- B 0C
4. SCP EF. NO. 1.2.3.11.2 QAR SECTION:
6. TYPE OF ACTION REQUESTED: 0 Develop New Document 0 Chayn Ewdet w Dont Cancel Document
0 Review Only lattach tdocumntn DevrableS. DESCIUPTN OF ACTION OESTED 7. DOCUMENTS AFFECTED:
Process the deliverable for summaryaccounts OB3B2L95A, B. and C
_. REASON FOR ACTION REQUEST: 10. RELATED REPORT NUMEft
C:o n r te IS yeral Z _ ~~ I.V ~~~~~ 11I. REQUESTED BY:
Ernie L. Maler
T.Pwrn 7 P iRk1 T - 510-486-6709[ Addilional Material Attacted b P Mst
9.F ELUVERABLE DUE DAIE -,: c
April 30, 1995 _ _ _v
SECTION 11 -ACTION INITIATION J
12. REQUEST/ Q jcted 1. EDTORALP CHANGES: ov ` No 14 DOCUMENT FE: N a DELIVERABLE: wad
lE cs nEM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~tnoR = [E 13 X"Xo D Cznxl M Nux~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Oe 1 asnC C M.16. CHANGE METHOD: DIN 0 vsOn Cancel sWA Yo c.AT1N 0- No
17. TRAINING RECOMMENDATION: 0 Sel Study0Casoo m W 03 Oter_________
111. PREPARER ASStMND: Ito m L AS55jANT MANAEOICTOR.'--~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f
DELIVERABLE, wA 021. OMR copy wfth daevanfable to Convractin Oftier flepre~trea: -15 .....
Data22. DAR copy to tO:
Date
SECTION III - ACTION REVIEW23. TRAINING REQ UIREMENTS: 0 WA' 0 Yes- Nmber f Days ReQuIred for Tra .
COMMENTS:
2t.uJres oot1t ceton In Comment Sectton.
24. TtaU*Vn OfficerJffsAvnn Manager 26. PLANS AND PROCEDURES DEPARTAENT'0AR Completiorj
22. OADlooopywto RO _ 5-likS .
I ,i '
ExhiA YAP6.1 0.1
APR-28-1995 16:51 702 794 7889 P.02
YMP108-R4 YUCCA MOUNTAIN SITE CHARACTERIZATION PROJECT POe o fJ
04/03/95 DOCUMENT ACTION REQUEST PD DA No.I
(DAR) DAR NoQQ 2t/ Asignod: S 39 S
Signetures on ti idocurer~.np t elgneee ackwowdgwmnt*tthe pplcabb proci has ben rad.w nderstood, *nd
SECTION I - ACTION REOUEST1. bOCUali T ML: - 2 URRENT DOCUENTNO.: |^RVIH ar
Surface Based Geophysical Testing OBBO2C t f I
4. SCP REF. NO.: 1.2.3.11.2 - A SECTION:
S. TYPE OF ACTION REQUESTED: 0 Develop New Domet 0 Ch"" Etine Docta 0 Cancel Docutwx
O Review Ody 4afech oMI Deverab6. DESCRTION OF ACIION REQUESTED: 7. DOCUMENTS AFFECTED:
Process the deliverable for summaryaccounts 0B3B2L95A, B. and C
c:,4 1 ~i 1D #r C0,s> _ _ -________________
0. REASON FOR ACTION REQUEST: 10. RELATED REPORT _MBER
11. REQUESTED BY:
Ernie L. Haler
-Tairpnf-p Rrkolp Iv lh -50-86-6709Addtonal Material Altaced eab.
* DELIVERABLE OME VATL _ ______
April 30,1995 _
SECTION _- ACTION INITIATION
12. EET %- eetd 1.EDTRLCANS: v. a14. DOCUMENT D dnDELIVERABLE: W . x
16. CNiGE ETHOD: OICN 0 Reaon OCanelt tI/UA I6. CC ACTION. 0 Yes iiN
17. TRAINING RECOMMENDATN0 D Dal St*d 0 Cksom Tav. W WA 0 O.e
19. PREPARER ASSIGNED: .0. S,"ME A NW E)ECTOL
DELIVERABLE: wA 0321. tM copy vth deivre 1o Coonreilo Offcer @fwpeenatr:_______
22. DA copy to RO: 5 4 DatData
SECTION III - ACTION REVIEW
23. TRAINING REOUIREMENTS: 0 WA 0 Ye . Numb f Da RQd fr Traning:
COMMENTS:
ORWquie etlotbn In C mmont Sectlon.
24. Ttsning OfficorITreanl Manager: 2t. PLS AND PROCEDURES DEPARTMENT IDAM Completioni
Sia~we ear. 14o' -tew. h'*
APR-2F-1995 16:51 702 794 7809sr.
j .P.'02
� I - .;,-4" -'-?'V - -: -5)' -I: : ! yk) -;
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.I Cyclotron Ro.d Berkeley. California 94720
I.1�1 1415) 486-4000 * FrS 451-4000
April 28, 1995
Susan JonesAssistant Manager for Scientific ProgramsYucca Mountain Site aratizaion OfficeAt: Mary Ann NusbaumPlans and Procedures Dept.TW101 Convention Center Drive, Room 704, Mailstop 423LAs Vegas, NV 89109
SUBJECT: Deliverable for Milestones OBB02C and OBB03C for WBS 12.3.11.2
Dear Dr. Jones:
Please find enclosed four copies of amilestone ret for Surface Geophysics. Ibisreport satisfies milestones OBB02C and OBB03C for WBS 1.2.3.11.2 SummaryAccounts OB3B2L9SA, B and C. This milesone report was technically reviewed by LBLfollowing appropriate Quality Assurance Procedumes.
If you have any questions or co ets, please contact me at (510) 486-4789 or E. Majer at(510) 486-6709. *
*Sincerely,
udmundur S. BqssonHead, Nuclear W tEarth Sciences Division
GSB:ctAtachmentcc: T. Statton, M&O (wo enclosure) - -
K Tynan, DOE (w/o enclosure)Y. Tsang, LBL (w/o enclosure)E. t4, Lo L A 4
.. i