husein ajwa*, susanne klose, shachar shem-tov, clyde ...ranunculus production with methyl bromide...
TRANSCRIPT
RANUNCULUS PRODUCTION WITH METHYL BROMIDE ALTERNATIVES
RANUNCULUS PRODUCTION WITH METHYL BROMIDE ALTERNATIVES
Husein Ajwa*, Susanne Klose,
Shachar Shem-Tov, Clyde Elmore,
and Mike A. Mellano
Alternative Fumigants
Methyl bromide (MB)Methyl bromide (MB)CHCH33BrBr
IodomethaneIodomethane (IM)(IM)CHCH33II
Alternative Fumigants
Chloropicrin Chloropicrin TrichloronitromethaneTrichloronitromethane (CCl(CCl33NONO22))
MethylisothiocyanateMethylisothiocyanate (MITC, C(MITC, C22HH33NS)NS)generators:generators:MetamMetam--Na or Na or metammetam--K or K or BasamidBasamid
TeloneTelone C35 and C35 and InLineInLine62% 1,362% 1,3--dichloropropene (Cdichloropropene (C33HH44ClCl22))plus 33% chloropicrinplus 33% chloropicrin
Alternative Chemicals(Experimental)
Sodium azide
Furfural
Propazone
Plantpro (KI)
2-Bromo ethanol
Dimethyl disulfide
Acrolein
Propargyl bromide
Shank injection of Midas & MB/Pic
Ranunculus bulb harvest count over two years under shank fumigation with MBr and MidasTM
Treatment Rate Bulb grade and No./100 ft.bed
2001/02 Jumbo #1 TotalMBr/Pic (350 lbs/ac) 334 a 520 a 1642 aMidas 50 (300 lbs/ac) 323 a 477 a 1507 aMidas 50 (350 lbs/ac) 317 a 480 a 1568 aUntreated ----- 101 b 202 b 814 b
2002/03 Jumbo #1 TotalMBr/Pic (350 lbs/ac) 800 a 775 a 2005 aMidas 50 (300 lbs/ac) 792 a 725 a 1867 aMidas 50 (350 lbs/ac) 808 a 729 a 1907 aUntreated ---- 258 b 200 b 620 b
Elmore et al
Midas and MB:Pic were shank applied under VIF and standard HDPE tarp
Midas and MB:Pic were shank applied under VIF and standard HDPE tarp
Ranunculus plant vigor and flower bunch count(Shank injection, 2003/04)
Treatment Rate Plant Bunch(lbs/ac) health* No./100 bed
MB+Pic 350 11.5 a 395 a
Midas 50 300 18.5 a 414 a
Untreated ---- 34.8 b 248 b
*Plant health = Number of plants showing root and stem rot
Telone C35 was shank injected at 425 lbs/ac and Basamid was applied at 200 lbs/ac for weed controlTelone C35 was shank injected at 425 lbs/ac and
Basamid was applied at 200 lbs/ac for weed control
Comparison among drip applied fumigants
Reduced rates of InLine, Midas, & Pic with/without MetamReduced rates of InLine, Midas, & Pic with/without Metam
Ranunculus Bulb Harvest Count Drip Fumigation: 2001/02
Treatment Rate Bulb grade and Number*lbs/ac Jumbo #1 Total
Metam 320 114 a 162 b 1049 bcMidas 50 350 120 a 323 a 1524 aPic 300 150 a 297 a 1442 abPic 350 125 a 308 a 1491 abNa-azide 60 126 a 110 b 841 c Na-azide 100 108 a 155 b 1144 abcInline 400 126 a 296 a 1312 abUntreated --- 132 a 105 b 765 c
*Tubers from 100 feet of row, Ave. 5 reps.
Elmore et al
Treatment Rate Bulb grade and Number*Jumbo #1 Total
Metam 320 256 bc 425 bc 992 bMidas 50 350 356 a 539 abc 1239 aPic 150 383 a 650 a 1427 aPic 300 289 a 567 ab 1239 aNa-azide 100 239 c 383 cd 894 b Inline 150 328 ab 556 ab 1322 aInline 300 367 a 572 ab 1334 aUntreated --- 128 d 233 d 550 c
*Tubers from 100 feet of plot, Ave. 6 reps.
Ranunculus Bulb Harvest Count Drip Fumigation: 2002/03
Elmore et al
ControlControl
300300InLineInLine
200200PicPic
200 200 Midas 33:67Midas 33:67
Rate (lbs/a)Treatment
ControlControl
300300InLineInLine
200200PicPic
200 200 Midas 33:67Midas 33:67
Rate (lbs/a)Treatment
Comparison among drip applied fumigantsReduced rate
Treatments were applied with & without metamsodium (40 gal/a)
Ranunculus flower bunches (5 harvests)-2003/04
161.4 b161.4 bW/O metamW/O metam
198.6 a198.6 aWith metam (40 gal)With metam (40 gal)
74.7 b74.7 bControlControl
224.8 a224.8 aInLineInLine (300 lb/A)(300 lb/A)
205.4 a205.4 aPic (200 lb/A)Pic (200 lb/A)
215.0 a215.0 aMidas 33:67 (200 lb/A)Midas 33:67 (200 lb/A)
Flower bunches (no.)Treatment
161.4 b161.4 bW/O metamW/O metam
198.6 a198.6 aWith metam (40 gal)With metam (40 gal)
74.7 b74.7 bControlControl
224.8 a224.8 aInLineInLine (300 lb/A)(300 lb/A)
205.4 a205.4 aPic (200 lb/A)Pic (200 lb/A)
215.0 a215.0 aMidas 33:67 (200 lb/A)Midas 33:67 (200 lb/A)
Flower bunches (no.)Treatment
Bulb yield (Bulb no. by class) and total number
Treatment Jumbo 6’s 5’s Total
Midas 1408 a 2378 a 2893 a 10005 aPic 1369 a 2485 a 2824 a 10007 aInLine 1099 b 2159 a 2882 a 9846 aControl 441 c 1024 b 1556 b 5232 b
W metam 1155 a 2145 a 2665 a 9402 aW/O met 1002 a 1878 a 2412 a 8176 a
200200MB/PicMB/Pic
ControlControl
300300InLineInLine
200200PicPic
200 200 Midas 33:67 Midas 33:67
Rate (lbs/a)Treatment
200200MB/PicMB/Pic
ControlControl
300300InLineInLine
200200PicPic
200 200 Midas 33:67 Midas 33:67
Rate (lbs/a)Treatment
Comparison among drip applied fumigantsReduced rates (2nd year)
Treatments were applied with & without Treatments were applied with & without metammetam--K K (37 gal/a) under VIF and thick (1.8 mil) LDPE tarp(37 gal/a) under VIF and thick (1.8 mil) LDPE tarp
Untreated control
Weed control with drip-applied fumigants
Ranunculus fields
2005
Nutsedge
Control
InLineplusmetam
Midas
InLine
Metam
Ranunculus fields (2nd year)
Ran
uncu
lus
bulb
num
ber/p
lot
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000Jumbo size (>7 cm) 6 to 7 cm5 to 6 cm
-KP +KP -KP +KP -KP +KP -KP +KP -KP +KP
MB/Pic200 lb/a
InLine300 lb/a
Midas200 lb/a
Chloropicrin 200 lb/a
Control
-KP = without KPAM+KP = followed by KPAM
Ranunculus yield (Bulb no. by class) 2005
2005
% o
f hig
h qu
ality
bul
bs (4
+ 5
gra
des)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
-KP +KP -KP +KP -KP +KP -KP +KP -KP +KP
MB/Pic200 lb/a
InLine300 lb/a
Midas200 lb/a
Chloropicrin 200 lb/a
Control
-KP = without KPAM+KP = followed by KPAM
Bulb Quality
2005
% o
f hig
h qu
ality
bul
bs (4
+ 5
gra
des)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
STD VIF STD VIF STD VIF STD VIF STD VIF
MB/Pic200 lb/a
InLine300 lb/a
Midas200 lb/a
Chloropicrin 200 lb/a
Control
STD = Standard PE tarp (1.8 mil)VIF = Virtually impermeable film
Bulb Quality
SummarySummarySummary
Single application:Single application:
Drip fumigation with Chloropicrin (300 lbs/ac) or Drip fumigation with Chloropicrin (300 lbs/ac) or InLineInLine
(400 lbs/ac) can maintain commercial production. (400 lbs/ac) can maintain commercial production.
Sequential application:Sequential application:
Drip fumigation with Chloropicrin (200 lbs/ac) or Drip fumigation with Chloropicrin (200 lbs/ac) or InLineInLine
(300 lbs/ac) followed by (300 lbs/ac) followed by metammetam (5 to 7 days later) can (5 to 7 days later) can
maintain commercial production.maintain commercial production.
SummarySummarySummary
Shank injection with 400 lbs/ac of Shank injection with 400 lbs/ac of TeloneTelone C35 C35
(or 18 gal of 1,3(or 18 gal of 1,3--D plus 200 lbs/ac of D plus 200 lbs/ac of
chloropicrin) followed by 100 to 200 lbs/ac of chloropicrin) followed by 100 to 200 lbs/ac of
BasamidBasamid (for weed control) is the most (for weed control) is the most
promising fumigation practice in areas where promising fumigation practice in areas where
drip fumigation is not possibledrip fumigation is not possible
SummarySummarySummary
When registered, When registered, MidasMidasTMTM should substitute for should substitute for MeBrMeBr
Shank injection with 300 lbs/ac of Shank injection with 300 lbs/ac of MidasMidasTMTM (50:50 (50:50
formulation) controlled pathogens and weeds and formulation) controlled pathogens and weeds and
produced yields equivalent to produced yields equivalent to MeBr:CPMeBr:CP (67:33) shank (67:33) shank
fumigation.fumigation.
Drip fumigation with 200 lbs/ac of Drip fumigation with 200 lbs/ac of MidasMidasTMTM (33:67 (33:67
formulation) followed by formulation) followed by metammetam (5 to 7 days later) (5 to 7 days later)
controlled pathogens and weeds and produced yields controlled pathogens and weeds and produced yields
equivalent to equivalent to MeBr:CPMeBr:CP (67:33) shank fumigation.(67:33) shank fumigation.
SummarySummarySummary
Drip fumigation with 250 lbs/ac of Drip fumigation with 250 lbs/ac of MidasMidasTMTM (33:67 (33:67
formulation) controlled pathogens and weeds and formulation) controlled pathogens and weeds and
produced yields equivalent to produced yields equivalent to MeBr:CPMeBr:CP (67:33) shank (67:33) shank
fumigation.fumigation.
Acknowledgements:California Cut Flower CommissionUSDA-CSREESUSDA-IR4 programMellano Flower Co.Mark Lauman & Paul Niday, TriCalArysta LifeSciencesBruno Rimini
Thank you very much