human rights in north korea and u.s. policy
DESCRIPTION
Human Rights in North Korea and U.S. Policy. Sun Song PARK Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea. Different Views and Policy Proposals concerning the N. K. Human Rights Problems. Two Questions What is the exact situation of human rights in North Korea? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Human Rights Policy 1
Human Rights in North Human Rights in North KoreaKorea
andand U.S. Policy U.S. Policy
Sun Song PARKDongguk University, Seoul, South Korea
Human Rights Policy 2
Different Views and Policy ProposalsDifferent Views and Policy Proposalsconcerning the N. K. Human Rights concerning the N. K. Human Rights
ProblemsProblems
Two Questions1. What is the exact situation of
human rights in North Korea?2. How can the situation of
human rights in North Korea be improved?
Human Rights Policy 3
Table of Contents
1. Situation and Changes of the N.K.H.R. i. Assessment and measurement ii. Nature and causes iii. Recent changes2. How to Improve the Situation i. Theories and experiences ii. Critical assessment of U.S. policy iii. Policy alternative: principles/measures
Human Rights Policy 4
Attitudes toward the Human Attitudes toward the Human Rights Problem in North KoreaRights Problem in North Korea
Before the late 1980s- political and ideological approach- domination of security strategy
After the end of the Cold War and the democratization of South
Korea- regime change versus humanitarian assistance- pressure/containment versus engagement
Human Rights Policy 5
ASSESSMENT & ASSESSMENT & MEASUREMENTMEASUREMENT
Of the Human Rights Of the Human Rights Situation in North KoreaSituation in North Korea
Human Rights Policy 6
U.N. on the N.K.H.R. U.N. on the N.K.H.R. SituationSituation
Resolution 2004/13 of the U.N.C.H.R. - “its deep concern about continuing reports of systemic, widespread and grave violations of human rights in the D.P.R.K.”
- a request for the appointment of the Special RapporteurU.N. Initiative “as a window of
opportunity to engage with the world, particularly with the U.N., to improve the human rights situation in the country” for North Korea
Human Rights Policy 7
Human Rights Situation in North Korea
by the Special Rapporteur Catastrophic food
shortages and subsequent food crisis
Restriction of basic freedom, detention centers, and political discrimination
Control of movement, and refugees or displaced persons
Dismantlement of basic social service (health, education)
Restriction of political participation and non-access to information
Rise in infant mortality, malnutrition, trafficking, inhumane punishment upon return
Human Rights Policy 8
Two ProvisosCredibility of
Testimonies- Distinguish between
system-specific abuses and general-but-individual abuses
- In the latter cases, we need to approach the testimonies more carefully.
Danger of Comparison
Two negative influences (1) Reversal of
priority between famine and other abuses
(2) Demonizing N.K. and inducing excessive policies
Human Rights Policy 9
How to measure the N.K. Human Rights
Human Rights in Principle - insufficient legal protection and compliance
with international norms - negative gap between de jure / de facto
Human Rights in Practice - a lot of event-based reporting of H.R. violations - Freedom House: N.K. as ‘not free’ state
Policy Outcomes related to H.R. - UNDP categorized N.K. as ‘high priority country’ - Bank of Korea: economic recession in the 1990s
Human Rights Policy 10
NATURE AND CAUSESNATURE AND CAUSES
Of the Human Rights Of the Human Rights Situation in North KoreaSituation in North Korea
Human Rights Policy 11
Character of the N.K.H.R. Situation
• System-specific Characteristic - A typical “centrally controlled
bureaucracy” or classical socialist system
- Especially, after the late 1960s, the “unitary ruling regime” with the ideology of “Juche”
Human Rights Policy 12
Three Contextual Qualifications
System of Division - Korean war and division directly influence the
N.K.H.R. situation. See V. Muntarbhorn.
Change of Political Regime - The unitary ruling regime rose in the 1960s
and began to weaken from the mid 1990s.
Economic Crisis in the 1990s - Economic crisis provoked a humanitarian
disaster and weakened governmental control.
Human Rights Policy 13
No attempt to understand the human rights situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea can be totally separated from the challenge of peace and human security in the region. … The fact that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is heavily militarized raises a question concerning equitable allocation of resources - the need to reallocate those resources to promote and protect human rights. No attempt to understand the human rights situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea can be totally separated from the challenge of demilitarization and disarmament in the region. Muntarbhorn, 2005, p.8, paragraphs 23 & 24.
Human Rights Policy 14
Complexity of the N.K. Situation
Policy ImplicationsMilitary tensions and security
crises as a pretext for repression. => Improvement of inter-Korean relations and
détente in the Korean Peninsula as a key factor for the alleviation of the N.K.H.R. situation.
From a “strong, intolerant, and oppressive state” to “state failure”
=> Economic and social restoration as a point of departure for human rights improvement.
Human Rights Policy 15
RECENT CHANGESRECENT CHANGES
Related to the Human Related to the Human Rights Situation in North Rights Situation in North
KoreaKorea
Human Rights Policy 16
Even small changes are important.
The process of improving the human rights situation is a long, a long, phased, and complex process phased, and complex process of system-and-norm change.of system-and-norm change.
=> Even small changes could be important signs of the beginning of norm compliance and system change.
Human Rights Policy 17
Three Significant Changes
① Continued contact with international society on the subject of human rights - UN, AI, EU, etc.
② Human rights-oriented establishment, amendment, and supplementation of laws.
③ Economic reforms and open door policies since the early 2000s.
Human Rights Policy 18
Meaning of Changes All these changes would be part of the
N.K. authorities’ survival strategy. But, they show:① N.K. is changing in the progressive
direction.② N.K. is attempting economic reforms as
other socialist countries did.③ The insufficiency and inefficiency of
changes and reforms will eventually provoke more radical changes.
Human Rights Policy 19
Premises of Discussion Following
We tried to show in the first part:1. The North Korean authorities behave
within the general maxims of political regime and international relations.
2. North Korea is changing and the appropriate and continuous efforts of international society will probably result in the peaceful transformation of its regime.
In the second part, we discuss how to improve the N.K. human rights situation.
Human Rights Policy 20
THEORIES AND THEORIES AND EXPERIENCESEXPERIENCES
Policy ImplicationsPolicy Implications
Human Rights Policy 21
Dynamics of International Human Rights Compliance
What is the relative role of external pressure versus internal commitment?
Three Explanatory Factors: Power, Self-Interest, Norms
Three Levels of Actions: International/Regional, Domestic, and Domestic-International Interactions
Cardenas, 2004, p.214.
Human Rights Policy 22
Five Conditions of Compliances
1. Existence of relevant international norms
2. Material interests of a major power3. Transnational network activism4. Domestic allies in target states5. Domestic political elites who either
view themselves as being vulnerable internationally or care about their international reputations
Cardenas, 2004, p.219.
Human Rights Policy 23
Logic of ViolationThree Closely related
Conditions1. National security threats2. Pro-violation constituencies (for
example, members of the coercive apparatus and domestic economic elites)
3. Rules of exception (i.e. certain legal and belief systems, which support oppressive institution)
Human Rights Policy 24
Policy ImplicationsInternational threats and coercive
sanctions as security threats could aggravate the N.K.H.R. situation.
Economic development is the sine qua non of the amelioration of H.R. situation.
A first step for N.K. is creating material and moral conditions necessary for the rise of civil society.
Human Rights Policy 25
Experiences ofSouth Korea and China
• The policy of “pushing violations” is more effective than that of “pulling compliance”.
• South Korea: diminution of security threats, economic development, civil movement, and democratization
• China: economic reform, open door policy, economic development, and amicable foreign policy
Human Rights Policy 26
CRITICAL ASSESSMENTCRITICAL ASSESSMENT
Of U.S. Human Rights Of U.S. Human Rights Policy toward North KoreaPolicy toward North Korea
Human Rights Policy 27
Bush Administration’s Policy
To raise the tone of criticism and international pressures toward the N.K.H.R. situation.
To connect the issue of H.R. with a settlement of nuclear conflict and an improvement of diplomatic relations.
To have established a law called the “N.K.H.R. Act of 2004” that directly influences the N.K. domestic situation.
Human Rights Policy 28
Types of Human Rights Policy
CONJUNCTION
DISJUNCTION
SANCTION/INTERVENTION
TYPE I TYPE II
AID/DIALOGUE
TYPE III TYPE IV
Human Rights Policy 29
WEAKNESS 1WEAKNESS 1
Inconsistency between policy objectives
- Security or Human Rights? - We are not sure if security-based and
human-rights based policies can go together.
- The U.S. seems to take advantage of the N.K. human rights situation in order to justify the hawkish policy toward N.K.
Human Rights Policy 30
WEAKNESS 2WEAKNESS 2 Inconsistency between end
and means - Hawk engagement is not suitable to
improve the N.K.H.R. situation. - Without diplomatic relations,
expressing hostile intention will result in negative consequences.
- To spread radios and facilitate North Korean’s acquisition of refugee status in the U.S. may be a security threat to N.K.
Human Rights Policy 31
WEAKNESS 3WEAKNESS 3 Misconceptions of situation,
process, and human rights - The U.S. thinks of the human rights
problem as an issue separated or separable from the general situation of N.K.
- The long process of compliance requires consistency and patience of policy.
- The Bush Administration has a narrowly defined understanding of human rights.
Human Rights Policy 32
POLICY ALTERNATIVEPOLICY ALTERNATIVE
Principles and MeasuresPrinciples and Measures
Human Rights Policy 33
Comprehensive and Practical Comprehensive and Practical ApproachApproach
Principle 1: Structural and Historical Approach to the N.K.H.R. Situation
=> Economic Restoration and DétentePrinciple 2: For reasons of emergency,
more urgent consideration should be given to the subsistence rights.
Principle 3: A pragmatic approach, i.e. “ a constructive step-by-step approach”
Human Rights Policy 34
MeasuresMeasuresMeasure 1: To begin real negotiation
with N.K. and to separate security issues from human rights problem.
Measure 2: To increase humanitarian assistance and to let international actors offer more economic aids to N.K.
Measure 3: To accept the concept of “division of roles” and to permit international human rights actors to do their jobs.
Human Rights Policy 35
Criticism of Hazel SmithCriticism of Hazel SmithBy introducing policy initiatives based on ostensibly humanitarian principles but designed to be rejected by Pyongyang, combined with security demands that would in effect mean a voluntary dismantling of what North Korea considers is its only negotiating card, the U.S. administration is able to avoid negotiation while appearing to act in good faith. … Unfortunately, the idea that the use of coercion instead of persuasion, and rhetoric rather than reality, will bring security to the Korean Peninsula is mistaken. Smith, 2004, p.45.