hp19 antibody injection

Upload: guaracini-loterio

Post on 05-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    1/13

    32 Arif et al.

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 66:3244 (2007)

    2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.DOI: 10.1002/arch.20195

    Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com)

    Significance of the 19-kDa Hemolymph Protein HP19for the Development of the Rice Moth Corcyra

    cephalonica: Morphological and Biochemical EffectsCaused by Antibody Application

    Abul Arif,1,2 Damodar Gullipalli,1 Klaus Scheller,3 and Aparna Dutta-Gupta1*

    The hemolymph protein HP19 of the rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica, mediates the 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) -dependent ac idphosphatase (ACP) activity at a nongenomic level. Affinity-purified polyclonal antibody against HP19 (HP19-IgG) was usedin the present study to understand the role of HP19 during the postembryonic development ofCorcyra. In the in vitro studies,HP19 action was blocked either by immuno-precipitation using HP19-IgG, prior to its addition to the fat body culture or bythe addition of the antibody directly to the culture, along with 20E and hemolymph containing HP19. The HP19-IgG blocked

    the HP19-mediated 20E-dependent ACP activation. In the in vivo studies, the HP19-IgG was injected into the fully devel-oped last (final/Vth) instar larvae ofCorcyra, to complex the HP19 in vivo, in order to block the action of HP19. The injectionofHP19-IgG resulted in defective development of larvae, which grew either into non-viable larvae or larval-pupal/pupal-adult intermediates relative to the effect of pre-immune IgG injected controls. The present study shows that HP19plays an important role in controlling the metamorphosis ofCorcyraby regulating the 20E-dependent ACP activity. Coupledwith the earlier findings, the ecdysteroid hormone regulates this action at a nongenomic level. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol.66:3244, 2007. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

    KEYWORDS: Corcyra cephalonica; 20-hydroxyecdysone ; acid phosphatase; fa t body culture; hexamerins;nongenomic ecdysteroid action

    1Department of Animal Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India2Department of Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

    3Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Biocentre of the University, Wurzburg, GermanyContract grant sponsor: DST, Govt. of India; Contract grant sponsor: University Grants Commission, India (UGC); Contract grant sponsor: Council for Industrial andScientific Research (CSIR), India.

    Abbreviations used: HP19-IgG = IgG fraction of polyclonal antibody against HP19 raised in rabbit; hexamerin-IgG = IgG fraction of polyclonal antibodyagainst hexamerin raised in rabbit; ACP = acid phosphatase; LLI = late-last instar larvae; PMSF = phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride; PNP = p-nitrophenol;20E = 20-hydroxyecdysone.

    *Correspondence to: Prof. Aparna Dutta-Gupta, Department of Animal Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, 500 046, India.

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Received 15 May 2006; Accepted 17 February 2007

    INTRODUCTION

    The role of ecdysteroids controlling the postem-

    bryonic development of insects is well established

    (Trumann and Riddiford, 2002). The hormones

    regulate a wide variety of functions including ini-

    tiation of breakdown of larval structures during

    metamorphosis (Gilbert et al., 1996) and uptakeof hexamerins (Burmester and Scheller, 1999).

    Programmed cell death is crucial for normal de-

    velopment and occurs mostly by apoptosis of indi-

    vidual cells and autophagy of cell groups. Ecdysteroid

    triggered regulation of autophagy is well demon-

    strated in Drosophila (Lee and Baehriecke, 2001;

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    2/13

    Role of HP19 in C. cephalonica 33

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    Thummel, 2001). In holometabolous insects, the

    larval structures degenerate at the beginning of

    metamorphosis (Lockshin and Beaulton, 1974).

    Lysosomal enzymes play an important role in the

    histolysis of larval organs, tissue remodeling, cel-

    lular destruction, and reorganization. The requiredenergy and metabolic fuel are provided by the fat

    body. Acid phosphatase is one of the commonly

    used marker enzymes to study lysosomal activity

    in insects (Verkuil, 1979, 1980; Ashok and Dutta

    Gupta 1988, 1991). Acid phosphatases occur in

    multiple forms and different isozymes in almost

    all organisms (Konichev et al., 1982; Kutuzova et

    al., 1991).

    Autophagic process or the lysosomal activity in

    whole animal as well as in the fat body exhibits a

    specific pattern during postembryonic develop-ment. The increase in the lysosomal activity is gov-

    erned by an increase of the 20E titer (Verkuil, 1979;

    Sass and Kovacs, 1980; Ashok and Dutta-Gupta,

    1988). The administration of exogenous 20E stimu-

    lates the ACP activity in ligated larvae ofSpodoptera

    litura (Sridevi et al., 1987) and Corcyra cephalonica

    (Ashok and Dutta-Gupta, 1988). However, the ad-

    dition of 20E alone to the larval fat body culture

    of Corcyra did not alter the ACP activity (Ashok

    and Dutta-Gupta, 1991). Similar observations were

    also reported inManduca sexta, where the ACP ac-tivity remained unchanged in fat body cultures in

    response to 20E (Caglayan, 1990). From these re-

    sults, it can be suggested that some additional

    factor(s) mediate the 20E regulated stimulation of

    ACP activity in vivo. Such a factor was identified

    in the hemolymph of late-last instar larvae of

    Corcyra because only when the fat body culture was

    supplemented with hemolymph could a stimula-

    tion of the ACP activity by 20E could be observed

    (Ashok and Dutta-Gupta, 1991). We later identi-

    fied this hemolymph factor as a 19-kDa protein

    (HP19) that mediated the 20E-stimulated ACP ac-

    tivity at a nongenomic level (Arif et al., 2004). In

    the present study, we report that the ACP activity

    is required for the normal metamorphosis and

    HP19 plays a critical role in controlling the meta-

    morphosis ofCorcyra by regulating the 20E-depen-

    dent ACP activity.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Insects and Thorax Ligation

    The larval forms of the rice moth, Corcyra

    cephalonica (Stainton), were reared on coarselycrushed sorghum seeds at 26 1C, 60 5% rela-

    tive humidity and 14:10 h light:dark photoperiod.

    The last instar larvae (=Vth) were further classified

    into different stages on the basis of their body

    weight and head capsule size as described by

    Lakshmi and Dutta-Gupta (1990). In the present

    study, mainly the late-last instar (LLI) larvae were

    used. The LLI larvae were thorax-ligated behind the

    first pair of prolegs by slipping a loop of silk thread

    around the head of the larvae as described earlier

    (Ashok and Dutta-Gupta, 1991).

    Preparation of Hemolymph Samples and

    Fat Body Homogenates

    The prolegs of LLI larvae were cut and the ooz-

    ing hemolymph was collected into tubes pretreated

    with 0.025% phenylthiourea, diluted (1:20)with10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)and spun for 3 min at

    1,000g to remove haemocytes and debris. The

    hemolymph samples were checked immediately fortheir effect on ACP activity. Freshly dissected fat

    bodies in cold insect Ringer (130 mM NaCl, 5 mM

    KCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, and 1 mM PMSF) were ho-

    mogenized in buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl,

    pH 7.4, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM PMSF as

    described in Arif et al. (2003) and used for SDS-

    PAGE, Western blotting, and ACP assay after esti-

    mating the protein content using bovine serum

    albumin (fraction V) as standard (Bradford, 1976).

    Assay of Acid Phosphatase (ACP)

    This was carried essentially according to the

    method of Henrickson and Clever (1974) as de-

    scribed in Ashok and Dutta-Gupta (1991) usingp-

    nitrophenyl bisodium phosphate as a substrate.

    The activity of the enzyme was expressed as n

    moles of PNP released/h/g fat body protein.

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    3/13

    34 Arif et al.

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    Fat Body Culture Studies

    The ribbon-shaped visceral fat bodies from 24 h

    post-ligated LLI larvae were dissected under sterile

    conditions in cold insect Ringer and transferred to

    100 l of TC-100 insect culture medium (JRH Bio-sciences, Inc.) with 1 g of streptomycin sulfate

    (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). After rinsing, the

    tissue was transferred to fresh 200 l culture me-

    dium and 80 nM 20E (in 0.05% ethanol) was

    added while an equal volume of carrier solvent

    (0.05% ethanol) was added to the control cultures.

    In case of studies with hemolymph, the diluted

    hemolymph (1:20) or purified hemolymph pro-

    tein HP19 (Arif et al., 2004) was added to the fat

    body culture in the presence or absence of 80 nM

    20E. The cultures were finally incubated for 4 h at

    25C with gentle shaking. At the end of incuba-

    tion, the tissue was removed, rinsed in insect

    Ringer, homogenized, and used for ACP assay.

    Production of Polyclonal Antibodies

    The HP19-IgG antibody was produced as de-

    scribed in Arif et al. (2004). The HP19 protein

    band obtained after ultrafiltration and gel filtra-

    tion was resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE and waselectroeluted using a model-422 electroeluter (Bio-

    Rad). The electroeluted protein was used as antigen

    to generate antibody against HP19 in 3-month-old

    male rabbit (New Zealand variety). The IgG frac-

    tion was purified by protein-A agarose chromatog-

    raphy (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturers

    protocol.

    Electrophoresis and Western Blotting

    Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE was performed using2.1% stacking and 12% resolving gel (Laemmli,

    1970) and the resolved proteins were visualized

    by silver staining (Blum et al., 1987). For Western

    analysis, hemolymph proteins resolved on SDS-

    PAGE were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane

    (Towbin et al., 1979). Then membrane was blocked

    with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBST (10

    mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1%

    Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature. The

    blocked membrane was incubated with HP19-IgG

    diluted (1:1,000) in TBST containing 3% BSA for

    2 h at room temperature. Thereafter, the membrane

    was incubated with 1:1,000 dilution of anti-rabbitIgG coupled with alkaline phosphatase (Sigma-

    Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in TBST containing 3% BSA

    for 1 h at room temperature. The detection of spe-

    cific cross-reactivity ofHP19-IgG with HP19 in

    total hemolymph protein was carried with nitro-

    blue tetrazolium chloride/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-

    indolyl phosphate color reaction.

    Functional Assay of HP19-IgG to Check ItsSpecificity Against HP19

    To test the specificity of HP19-IgG against

    HP19, functional assays were performed in two dif-

    ferent ways. In one experiment, the fat bodies kept

    in culture were incubated with 80 nM 20E (in

    0.05% ethanol), diluted (1:20) hemolymph from

    LLI larvae, and different dilutions ofHP19-IgG

    for 4 h at 25C.In another experiment, the HP19

    present in the hemolymph of LLI larvae was first

    immunoprecipitated usingHP19-IgG followed by

    addition of either the precipitate (immuno-com-plex) or the resulting immunodepleted superna-

    tant (termed immuno-supernatant) to the fat

    bodies kept in culture along with 80 nM 20E for 4

    h at 25C.The immunoprecipitation of HP19 from

    a fixed dilution (1:20) of total hemolymph pro-

    tein was carried out with various dilutions of

    HP19-IgG using protein-A-agarose (Boehringer

    Mannheim) as described in the manufacturers pro-

    tocol. The 1:10 dilution ofHP19-IgG contained

    10 g of IgG from which the antibody was serially

    diluted with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4).

    Injection of Antibodies for Immunocomplexing

    HP19 In Vivo

    The LLI larvae received injections ofHP19-IgG

    (15 g in 5 l phosphate buffered saline; 130 mM

    NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4 and 1.5 mM

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    4/13

    Role of HP19 in C. cephalonica 35

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    KH2PO4, pH 7.4, per insect) through the dorsal sur-

    face using a microsyringe. Control insects received

    injections of pre-immune IgG (15 g in 5 l phos-

    phate buffered saline/insect). These larvae to-

    gether with additional controls such as uninjected

    and phosphate buffered saline (5 l) injectedlarvae were placed on a diet (crushed sorghum)

    and allowed to grow under normal conditions.

    Twenty-five LLI larvae were used for each group

    studied. Various parameters such as morphologi-

    cal, behavioral, and biochemical changes like fat

    body ACP activity, were analyzed on different days

    after HP19-IgG injection. A comparison was

    made between the HP19-IgG and various con-

    trol groups of larvae. The results with all control

    groups were identical; hence, among control

    groups, only the data of pre-immune-IgG injectedlarvae are presented.

    Histological and Immunohistochemical Studies

    The fat bodies from HP19-IgG-injected larvae

    and pre-immune IgG-injected larvae were fixed in

    Carnoys fixative (ethanol:chloroform:acetic acid.

    6:3:1) for 4 h at room temperature. The tissue was

    processed, paraffin embedded; 5-m-thick sections

    were cut and mounted on glass slides. For histo-

    logical studies, the sections were deparafinized andstained in hematoxylin/eosin. For the immuno-his-

    tochemical localization of HP19, the deparafinized

    tissue sections were first treated with blocking so-

    lution (2% BSA and 1% non-immune goat serum

    in TBS [10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl,

    pH 7.4] with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 h at 4C,

    followed by treatment with hexamerin-IgG (Arif

    et al., 2001) for 24 h at 4C with gentle shaking.

    The slides were then treated with anti-rabbit IgG

    coupled with alkaline phosphatase for 1 h. The

    washing after each step was done with three changes

    of TBS. These slides were finally processed for stain-

    ing using nitroblue tetrazolium chloride/5-bromo-

    4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and mounted in

    glycerol gels (50% glycerol, 7.5% gelatin, and 0.1%

    azide in 0.1 M TBS). The specificity of the antibody

    cross-reaction was checked by parallel processing of

    the tissue sections with pre-immune-IgG.

    Statistical Analysis

    All data were statistically analyzed by one-way

    analysis of variance followed by comparisons of

    means by Tukey multiple comparison test using

    Sigma Stat software (Jandel Corporation). The val-ues were considered significantly different from

    each other when *P< 0.05.

    RESULTS

    Specificity of the Antibody Against HP19

    The results presented in Figure 1a show the SDS-

    PAGE profile of hemolymph proteins (Fig. 1a, lane

    1) and of purified electroeluted HP19 (Fig. 1a, lane

    2). The electroeluted HP19 was used for antibody

    production. HP19 is present in the hemolymph

    in a very low concentration and is not detected as

    distinct protein band in the total hemolymph pro-

    tein preparation (Fig. 1a, lane 1). However, in the

    Western blot, the 19-kDa band is clearly seen (Fig.

    1b, lane 1). Furthermore, the specificity of the

    HP19-IgG was found to be high without any non-

    specific cross-reactions (Fig. 1b, lane 2). The speci-

    ficity of antibody was also confirmed by a protein

    adsorption assay in which the functional purified

    HP19 was preincubated with

    HP19-IgG to formantigen-antibody complex and was then used for

    Western blot as described in Figure 1b. The results

    showed no cross-reactivity against 19 kDa in the

    total hemolymph protein (data not presented).

    Functional Test of HP19 IgG to Check theSpecificity Against HP19

    In order to confirm whether anti-HP19 anti-

    body is capable of influencing the HP19-mediated

    20E-dependent ACP activity, HP19-IgG were

    added in different dilutions to the fat body cul-

    tures together with hemolymph containing active

    HP19 and 20E. The results obtained (Fig. 2) re-

    vealed thatHP19-IgG, dependent on its concen-

    tration, significantly blocked the potentiation of

    20E-mediated ACP activity. In another experiment,

    HP19-IgG was used for immunoprecipitation of

    HP19 from total hemolymph. The immuno-com-

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    5/13

    36 Arif et al.

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    Fig. 1. Specificity ofHP19-IgG. a: Silver-stained SDS-

    PAGE showing the purified HP19. The HP19 protein band

    obtained from ultrafiltration and gel filtration of total

    hemolymph protein ofCorcyra was resolved on 12% SDS-

    PAGE and electroeluted (Arif et al. 2004). The protein was

    injected to rabbit for antibody production. Lane 1: Totalhemolymph protein (10 g); lane 2: electroeluted HP19

    (3 g); lane M: protein markers (kDa). b: Western blot

    demonstrating the specificity of HP19-IgG. Lane 1: 10

    g of total hemolymph protein; lane 2: 20 g of total

    hemolymph protein.

    Fig. 2. Functional test ofHP19-IgG to check the speci-

    ficity against HP19. The fat bodies kept in culture were

    incubated in the presence of 80 nM 20E and 10 l of 1:20

    diluted hemolymph along with different dilutions ofHP19-IgG and hexamerin-IgG antibodies for 4 h at

    25C. At the end of incubation, the fat bodies were as-

    sayed for ACP activity. Each value is the mean SD of

    four independent determinations and for each assay fat

    body from two LLI larvae was pooled. *, The significant

    stimulation in the fat bodies kept in culture in the pres-

    ence of 20E and HP19 containing hemolymph. The pres-

    ence ofHP19-IgG rendered HP19 unavailable to mediate

    the 20E-dependent ACP activity stimulation in low anti-

    body dilutions, whereas the presence ofhexamerin-IgG

    had no effect.

    plex as well as the immuno-supernatant (see Ma-

    terials and Methods) was added to the fat body

    cultures. The 20E-stimulated ACP activity could not

    be detected in all the fat body cultures, which were

    supplemented with the immuno-complex that act

    as a control for this experiment (Fig. 3). However,

    the culture with a very high dilution of antibody

    (1:10,000) was insufficient to completely precipi-

    tate HP19 in the immuno-complex and thus, the

    immunodepleted supernatant (immuno-superna-

    tant) still contained HP19, which when added

    along with 20E could stimulate the ACP activity.

    These studies suggest that the HP19-IgG is

    complexed with HP19, hence the protein, HP19,

    was unavailable to mediate the 20E-dependent

    ACP activation. Use of another antibody, hexa-

    merin-IgG, not aimed to complex HP19 had no

    effect on the ability of HP19 to potentiate the fat

    body ACP activity.

    Effect of HP19-IgG Injection onLarval Growth and Development

    To get more insight into the role of HP19 for

    the postembryonic development ofCorcyra, we stud-

    ied the effect ofHP19-IgG, which was injected to

    LLI larvae. Under such circumstances, physiological

    functions of the protein will be at least partly sup-

    pressed possibly resulting in altered growth and dif-

    ferentiation of the larvae, pupae, and adults. The

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    6/13

    Role of HP19 in C. cephalonica 37

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    results indicated that although the mortality rate was

    more or less the same in the antibody-treated lar-

    vae compared to the control larvae, we observed sig-

    nificant morphological and behavioral changes

    (Table 1). Figures 4 and 5 show that the larvae,

    which had receivedHP19-IgG injections developed

    either in nonviable larvae (Fig. 4i ,j), or in non-

    viable larval-pupal intermediates (Fig. 4k,l), or in

    non-viable pupal-adult intermediates (Figs. 4m, 5b

    d) compared to the normally growing control lar-

    vae (Figs. 4bh, 5a). The control group of larvae

    injected with an equal quantity of pre-immune-IgG

    developed into normal adults clearly indicating that

    the effect caused byHP19-IgG was not due to the

    adventitious effect of protein injection.

    Fig. 3. Functional test ofHP19-IgG to check the speci-

    ficity against HP19. Addition of immunoprecipitated HP19

    (immuno-complex) and the immunodepleted HP19 (immuno-

    supernatant) from the total hemolymph proteins to checktheir ability in mediating the ACP activity of fat bodies

    kept in culture. The immunoprecipitation was carried us-

    ing serially diluted HP19-IgG and hexamerin-IgG with

    a fixed dilution (1:10) of the hemolymph on a protein-A

    agarose support. The immuno-complex and the superna-

    tant thus obtained were added to the fat bodies kept in

    culture in the presence of 80 nM 20E and incubated for 4 h

    at 25C. Each value is the mean SD of four independent

    determinations and for each assay fat body from two LLI

    larvae was pooled. Both immuno-complex and immuno-

    supernatant significantly blocked the potentiation of fat

    body ACP activity in low HP19-IgG dilutions, whereasthe immuno-supernatant obtained from a very high dilu-

    tion ofHP19-IgG immunoprecipitation had a negligible

    effect. The presence ofhexamerin-IgG had no effect.

    TABLE 1. Morphological and Behavioral Changes Upon HP19 IgGInjection to Final (=Vth) Instar Corcyra Larvae

    Control larvae HP19-IgG injected larvae

    10% mortality 15% mortality

    Normal silk secretion Reduced silk secretion

    Reduction in body and head capsule Delayed reduction in body and head

    size from 8 days onward capsule size after 11 daysPupation after 1315 days, except Pupation normally, after 1315 days,

    in wounded controls where pupation abnormally developed nonviable

    was delayed; pupa, however, was larva l-pupal intermediate

    well developed

    Emergence of well-developed adults Delayed metamorphosis, all adults

    in all controls after 2123 days abnormally developed, nonviable

    pupal-adult intermediate

    Effect of HP19-IgG Injection onFat Body ACP Activity

    The ACP activity profile in LLI that received in-jection ofHP19-IgG shows the suppression of

    HP19 function, which in turn is responsible for

    blocking the increase in the fat body ACP activity

    (Fig. 6). The ACP activity did not increase and re-

    mained fairly low after 4, 7, 10, and 14 days post-

    antibody injection. The control group showed a

    gradual and significant increase in ACP activity.

    Effect of HP19-IgG Injection on Fat Body andImplications on Hexamerin Uptake

    The results obtained from morphological and

    histological studies suggest that HP19 plays a role

    in hexamerin sequestration, which is a 20E-depen-

    dent process. The whole mount preparations of fat

    bodies from control (pre-immune-IgG injected)

    and HP19-IgG-injected larvae exhibit a clear dif-

    ference in the morphology and are more pro-

    nounced in larvae 10 and 14 days post-injection

    (Fig. 7a). Histological studies reveal the presence

    of a large number of darkly stained granules in

    the fat bodies of both the control and HP19-IgG-

    injected larvae on the day of injection (Fig. 7b, 0

    day post-injection). There was a decline in the

    number of cytoplasmic granules in the fat body

    sections of both control and HP19-IgG-injected

    larvae (Fig. 7b, 10 days post-injection). However,

    the number of granules increased significantly in

    the control (Fig. 7b, 14 days post-injection), when

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    7/13

    38 Arif et al.

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    Figure 5

    Figure 4

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    8/13

    Role of HP19 in C. cephalonica 39

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    compared with the HP19-IgG-injected larvae (Fig.

    7b, 14 days post-injection). This increase is mainly

    due to the sequestration of hexamerins from the

    hemolymph. Immunohistochemical studies using

    hexamerin-IgG substantiate the histological find-

    ings. Intense immunostaining was observed onlyin the control due to the sequestration of hexa-

    merins but it was significantly reduced in the fat

    bodies ofHP19-IgG-injected larvae (Fig. 7c, 14

    days post-injection).

    DISCUSSION

    During the development of holometabolous in-

    sects, many determinate larval cells undergo cell

    death at the end of the ultimate larval stage to en-sure metamorphosis and the subsequent emerging

    of an adult insect from the pupa. Furthermore, en-

    ergy and amino acid building blocks for imaginal

    tissues have to be provided. Storage proteins that

    are dense protein granules and serve as the reserve

    pool of amino acids are the major source of en-

    ergy during metamorphosis (Levenbook, 1985;

    Haunerland, 1996). These storage proteins whose

    major fraction accounts for the hexamerins are

    taken up by receptor-mediated endocytosis by the

    fat body shortly before pupation (Burmester and

    Scheller, 1999). After having been included in

    coated vesicles, the hexamerins are metabolized

    by lysosomal enzymes. As a part of cell remodel-

    ing during metamorphosis, the activity of acid

    phosphatases increases in the fat body and causes

    the death of larval tissues (Lockschin and Beaulton,

    1974; Lee and Baehriecke, 2001; Thummel, 2001).

    Fig. 6. Changes in the ACP activity in Corcyra larvae af-

    ter different days ofHP19-IgG injection. The increase in

    ACP activity was negligible in HP19-IgG-injected larvae

    when compared with control larvae where a gradual in-

    crease is seen. Each value is mean SD of 4 independent

    experiments and for each assay a fat body from 23 in-sects was pooled.

    Fig. 4. Effect ofHP19-IgG injection in last instar lar-

    vae of Corcyra. The last instar (=Vth) larvae were injected

    with HP19-IgG (15 g in 5 ml phosphate buffered sa-

    line/larvae) and were allowed to grow on crushed sor-

    ghum diet together with the various control groups

    including pre-immune-IgG (15 g in 5 l phosphate buff-

    ered saline/insect) injected, phosphate buffered saline (5

    l) injected, and uninjected larvae. Twenty-five larvae wereused for each group studied. A comparison for morpho-

    logical changes between the HP19-IgG-injected and vari-

    ous control groups of insects show a developmental arrest

    of the HP19-IgG-injected larvae. The photographs for con-

    trol (pre-immune-IgG injected) and HP19-IgG-injected lar-

    vae group were taken as indicated. Results obtained from

    other control groups were identical to that of the pre-im-

    mune-IgG-injected group. Injection ofHP19-IgG resulted

    into abnormal development of larvae as compared to the

    control. Each arrow in the control group indicates the gradual

    and normal development of the last (=Vth) instar larvae into

    a healthy adult.

    Fig. 5. Effect ofHP19 IgG injection in last instar larvae

    ofCorcyra. Development of non-viable pupal-adult inter-

    mediates (bd) as compared to normal adult shown in

    control (a) upon injection ofHP19-IgG to the last (=Vth)

    instar larvae of Corcyra (Fig. 4a). The photographs were

    taken after 30 days ofHP19-IgG (bd) or pre-immune-

    IgG injection (a).

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    9/13

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    10/13

    Role of HP19 in C. cephalonica 41

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    Mounting evidence shows that the ACP activity

    in the fat bodies of last instar larvae is stimulated

    by ecdysteroid hormones (Lockshin and Beulton,

    1974; Verkuil, 1979, 1980; Sass and Kovacs, 1980;

    Ashok and Dutta-Gupta, 1988; Kutuzowa et al.,

    1991), but almost nothing is known about themolecular mechanism of the hormone action gov-

    erning this process. To date, no single, universal

    mechanism can account for the hormonal control

    of histolysis. It is widely accepted that ecdysteroids,

    like the steroid hormones in vertebrates, act on

    gene transcription by interacting with nuclear recep-

    tors, which convert the hormonal stimulus into a

    transcriptional response (White and Parker, 1998;

    Scheller et al., 2003). Beyond it, several mechanisms

    for rapid, nongenomic actions have been reported

    (Losel and Wehling, 2003). Numerous experimentswith different species have shown that insect meta-

    morphosis is under the control of ecdysteroids and

    a few of the studies indicate that some events nec-

    essary for the larval-pupal-adult transition are con-

    trolled by ecdysteroid hormone at a nongenomic

    level (Verkuil, 1979; Ueno and Natori, 1984;

    Burmester and Scheller, 1997; Arif et al., 2004).

    However, studies on these mechanisms are limited

    to a few experimental systems like the activation of

    lysosomal enzymes including ACP or the activation

    of the hexamerin receptors. We have recently foundthat the hemolymph protein HP19 is required to

    mediate the 20E-stimulated ACP activity in Corcyra

    and this process is controlled by the hormone at a

    nongenomic level (Arif et al., 2004).

    The present study was designed to get further

    insights into the role of HP19. One approach was

    to deactivate or suppress the function(s) of the pro-

    tein with the help of specific antibodies. The use

    of antibodies to understand the role of a molecule

    in the physiological processes has been demon-

    strated in several species of invertebrates includ-

    ing insects. Hiraoka and Hayakawa (1990) reported

    that a monoclonal antibody against apolipophoriin

    II in Locusta migratoria inhibited the diacylglycerol

    uptake into the fat body. In another study, the in-

    oculation of antibodies against -N-acetylhexo-

    saminidase of the bovine tick, Boophilus microplus,

    resulted in a decreased oviposition (Del Pino et

    al., 1998). Nijhout and Grunert (2002) showed

    that specific antibodies against a bombyxin-like

    protein completely removed the growth-promot-

    ing activity in the hemolymph that is required by

    20E to regulate the normal growth of imaginal

    disks in the butterflyPrecis coenia. Hence, in orderto understand the role of HP19 in insect growth

    and development, the protein was immuno-

    complexed in vivo. Thus, the protein is unable to

    mediate the 20E-dependent action. Our results sug-

    gest that the injected antibodies suppressed the

    physiological action of the protein possibly by in-

    terfering with the HP19 molecule and caused the

    development of either nonviable larval, larval-pu-

    pal, or pupal-adult intermediates. Further analysis

    on various parameters including mortality rate, silk

    secretion, body and head capsule size revealedsignificant developmental changes in HP19-IgG-

    injected larvae when compared with the develop-

    mental pattern of control group of larvae. Themortality rate was more or less the same in the

    HP19-IgG-injected and control groups. However,larvae that received exogenous antibodies showed

    reduced salivation, delayed reduction in bodylength, and reduced head capsule size (Table 1).

    Although the duration required byHP19-IgG-in-jected larvae for pupation was identical to that of

    control group of larvae, most of the larvae devel-oped into abnormal non-viable larvae or larval-pu-

    pal intermediates upon antibody injection, andsome of them could metamorphose into adult but

    gave rise to non-viable pupal-adult intermediates.Previous studies have shown that ACP activity

    gradually increases during the postembryonic de-velopment ofCorcyra and reaches a peak value atthe pupal stage when the larval organs undergo

    histolysis (Ashok and Dutta-Gupta, 1988). In the

    present study, the control group showed similar

    ACP activity pattern. However, in antibody-injectedinsects this increase was totally suppressed and re-mained more or less the same throughout 14 dayspost-injection. We infer that blockage of HP19 by

    specific anti-HP19 antibody resulted in the block-age of the stimulation of ACP activity. Our results

    further strengthen the view that the ACP plays animportant role in insect development by regulat-

    ing the histolysis of larval organs.

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    11/13

    42 Arif et al.

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    Hexamerins are quantitatively the most promi-

    nent proteins in the larvae of many holometab-

    olous insects, whose functions, physico-chemical

    structure. and biosynthesis are well known (Hauner-

    land, 1996; Burmester and Scheller, 1999). As in

    all insect species investigated so far, the hexamerinsofCorcyra are synthesized by the fat bodies of the

    actively feeding larvae and released into hemo-

    lymph (KiranKumar et al., 1997; Nagamanju et al.,

    2003). The hexamerins are later taken back via a

    receptor-mediated endocytosis by the non-feeding

    prepupal or pupal fat body cells to meet energy

    requirements (Haunerland, 1996; Burmester and

    Scheller, 1999). Our results show that HP19 did

    not interfere with hexamerin synthesis but played

    a distinct role during its sequestration; hence, in

    the fat body of 14-day post-antibody-injected lar-vae, very little or no hexamerin was sequestered.

    The immunohistochemical analysis further con-

    firmed that HP19 antibody injection to last instar

    larvae resulted in improper sequestration suggest-

    ing that HP19 plays an important role in the pro-

    cess of 20E-regulated hexamerin sequestration

    besides its effect on ACP activity.

    The formation of coated vesicles, followed by

    the uptake of hexamerins into storage granules in

    the fat bodies, has been reported for dipteran as

    well as lepidopteran insects (Locke and Collins,1968; Marx, 1983; Levenbook, 1985). There was a

    significant reduction in the number of cytoplas-

    mic granules in the fat body of antibody-injected

    insects compared with the controls, suggesting that

    hexamerins were not sequestered in these insects.

    Although we know that (1) HP19 mediates the

    ecdysteroid hormone action, and (2) this action is

    regulated at a nongenomic level (Arif et al., 2004),

    we cannot decide to date whether or how the path-

    ways by which HP19 controls the ecdysteroid-regu-

    lated hexamerin uptake and acid phosphatase

    activity are connected.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The work was partly supported by a grant from

    DST, Govt. of India, sanctioned to A.D.-G. A. Arif

    and G. Damodar thank the University Grants Com-

    mission (UGC) and Council for Industrial and Sci-

    entific Research (CSIR), India, respectively, for fi-

    nancial support through a direct fellowship.

    LITERATURE CITED

    Arif A, Vasanthi M, Dutta-Gupta A. 2001. A rapid and repro-

    ducible protocol for the purification of insect storage pro-

    tein. Entomon 26:111.

    Arif A, Scheller K, Dutta-Gupta A. 2003. Tyrosine kinase me-

    diated phosphorylation of the hexamerin receptor in the

    rice moth Corcyra cephalonica by ecdysteroids. Insect

    Biochem Mol Biol33:921928.Arif A, Vasanthi P, Hansen IA, Scheller K. Dutta-Gupta A.

    2004. The insect hemolymph protein HP19 mediates the

    nongenomic effect of ecdysteroids on acid phosphataseactivity. J Biol Chem 279:2800028008.

    Ashok M, Dutta-Gupta A (Ray). 1988. Ecdysteroid mediated

    fat body acid phosphatase activity during larval develop-

    ment of rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica (Lepidoptera).

    Biochem Int17:10871091.Ashok M, Dutta-Gupta A (Ray). 1991. Hemolymph factor(s)

    potentiate the 20-hydroxyecdysone mediated stimulation

    of acid phosphatase activity in larval fat body of rice moth,

    Corcyra cephalonica. Invertebr Reprod Dev20:159165.

    Blum H, Beier H, Gross HJ. 1987. Improved silver staining

    of plant proteins, RNA, DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Elec-

    trophoresis 8:9399.

    Bradford M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for quanti-

    tation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing prin-

    ciple of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem72:248254.

    Burmester T, Scheller K. 1997. Developmentally controlled

    cleavage of the Calliphora arylphorin receptor and post-

    translational action of the steroid hormone 20-hydroxy-

    ecdysone. Eur J Biochem247:695702.

    Burmester T, Scheller K. 1999. Ligand and receptors: com-

    mon theme in insect storage protein transport. Natur-

    wissenchaften 86:468474.

    Caglayan SH. 1990. Effect of 20-hydroxyecdysone on acid

    phosphatase activity in the larval fat body ofManduca

    sexta. Biochem Int20:511518.

    Del Pino FAB, Brandelli A, Gonzales JC, Henriques JAP, Dewes

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    12/13

    Role of HP19 in C. cephalonica 43

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    H. 1998. Effect of antibodies against -N-acetylhexo-

    saminidase on reproductive efficiency of the bovine tick

    Boophilus microplus. Vet Parasitol 79:247255.

    Gilbert LI, Rybczynski R, Tobe SS. 1996. Endocrine cascade

    in insect metamorphosis. In:Gilbert LI, Tata JR, Atkinson

    BG, editors. Metamorphosis- postembryonic reprogram-

    ming of gene expression in amphibian and insect cells.

    San Diego: Academic Press. p 59107.

    Haunerland NH. 1996. Insect storage proteins: gene families

    and receptors. Insect Biochem Mol Biol26:755765.

    Henrickson PA, Clever U. 1972. Protease activity and cell

    death during metamorphosis in the salivary gland of

    Chironomus tentans. J Insect Physiol18:19812004.

    Hiraoka T, Hayakawa Y. 1990. Inhibition of diacylglycerol

    uptake from the fat body by a monoclonal antibodyagainst apolipophorin II in Locusta migratoria. Insect

    Biochem20:793799.

    KiranKumar N, Ismail SM, Dutta-Gupta A. 1997. Uptake of

    storage proteins in the rice moth Corcyra cephalonica: Iden-

    tification of storage protein binding proteins in the fat

    body cell membranes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 27:671

    679.

    Konichev AS, Echkalov AP, Filippovich IuB. 1982. Separation

    and properties of multiple forms of acid phosphatase from

    the tissues and organs of the mulberry silk worm. Biokhimiia

    47:19932005.

    Kutuzova NM, Fillippovich IuB, Kholdova IuD, Miladera K,

    Kindruk NL, Korniets GV, Moroz NS. 1991. Ecdysterone

    induces the activity of multiple forms of acid phosphatase

    and malate dehydrogenase in fat bodies ofAnterahea pernyi

    pupae. Ukrain Biokhim Z 63:4145.

    Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural protein during the

    assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680

    685.

    Lakshmi M, Dutta-Gupta A. 1990. Juvenile hormone medi-ated DNA synthesis during larval development ofCorcyra

    cephalonica. Biochem Int 22:269278.

    Lee YL, Baehriecke EH. 2001. Steroid regulation of autoph-

    agic programmed cell death during development. Devel-

    opment128:14431451.

    Levenbook L. 1985. Insect storage proteins. In: Kerkut GA,

    Gilbert LI, editors. Comprehensive insect physiology, bio-

    chemistry, and pharmacology, vol. 10. Oxford: Pergamon

    Press. p 307346.

    Locke M, Collins JV. 1968. Protein uptake in multivesicular

    bodies and storage granules in the fat body of an insect. J

    Cell Biol 36:453483.

    Lockshin RA, Beaulton J. 1974. Programmed cell death. Cy-

    tochemical evidence for lysosomes during the normal

    breakdown of the intersegmental muscles. J Ultrastuct Res

    46:4362.

    Losel R, Wehling M. 2003. Nongenomic actions of steroid

    hormones. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:4656.

    Marx R. 1983. Ultrastructural aspects of protein synthesis and

    protein transport in larvae ofCalliphora vicina. In: Scheller

    K, editor. The larval serum proteins of insects. Stuttgart:

    Georg Thieme Verlag. p 50-60.

    Nagamanju P, Hansen IA, Burmester T, Meyer SR, Scheller K,

    Dutta-Gupta A. 2003. Complete sequence, expression and

    evolution of two members of the hexamerin protein fam-

    ily during the larval development of the rice moth, Corcyra

    cephalonica. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 33:7380.

    Nijhout HF, Grunert LW. 2002. Bombyxin is a growth factor

    for wing imaginal disks in lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci

    USA99:1544615450.

    Sass M, Kovacs J. 1980. The effect of actinomycin D, cyclo-heximide and puromycin on 20-hydroxyecdysone induced

    autophagocytosis in larval fat body cells ofPieris brassicae.

    J Insect Physiol180:569577.

    Scheller K, Seibel P, Sekeris CE. 2003. Glucocorticoid and

    thyroid hormone receptors in mitochondria of animal

    cells. Int Rev Cytol 222:161.

    Sridevi R, Ray A, Ramamurty PS. 1987. Effect of 20-Hydroxy-

    ecdysone on acid phosphatase activity in the larval fat of

    Spodoptera litura. Biochem Int 15:907913.

    Thummel CS. 2001. Steroid triggered death by autophagy.

    Bioessays23:677682.

    Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J. 1979. Electrophoretic trans-

    fer of proteins from ployacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose

    sheets; procedure and some application. Proc Natl Acad

    Sci USA76:43504354.

    Trumann JW, Riddiford LM. 2002. Endocrine regulation into

  • 8/2/2019 HP19 Antibody Injection

    13/13

    44 Arif et al.

    Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology September 2007 doi: 10.1002/arch.

    the evolution of metamorphosis in insects. Ann Rev

    Entomol 47:467500.

    Ueno K, Natori S. 1984. Identification of storage protein re-

    ceptor and its precursor in the fat body membrane of

    Sarcophaga peregrina. J Biol Chem259:1210712111.

    Verkuil EVP. 1979. Hormone mediated induction of acid

    phosphatase activity in the fat body of Calliphora erythro-

    cephala prior to metamorphosis. J Insect Physiol25:965

    973.

    Verkuil EVP. 1980. The induction of lysosomal enzyme activ-

    ity in the fat body ofCalliphora erythrocephala: changes in

    the internal environment. J Insect Physiol26:91101.

    White R, Parker MG. 1998. Molecular mechanisms of steroid

    hormone action. Endocrine Related Cancer 5:114.