how useful is this account of the french occupation of the ruhr? use the source and your knowledge...

25

Upload: calvin-floyd

Post on 23-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 2: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 3: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 4: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:

CLICK TO REVEAL THE ANSWER!

Page 5: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 6: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 7: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 8: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:

CLICK TO SEE THE SOURCE

Page 9: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:

CLICK FOR THE ANSWER

THE SOURCE:

If we had no direct knowledge of misery in war time, we did when the French arrived. Traffic was at a stand-still, food became

scarce, and the behaviour of the French army was brutal. We all knew that none of us would ever salute a French officer. No one travelled on the railway which was run by the French. Several

Germans helped them and we considered them to be traitors. To use the railway would have been treason in our eyes.

A description of the French occupation of the Ruhr in 1923. It comes from a book called “Why Hitler Came to Power” by an SA

Officer, published in 1938.

Page 10: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:

THE SOURCE:

If we had no direct knowledge of misery in war time, we did when the French arrived. Traffic was at a stand-still,

food became scarce, and the behaviour of the French army was brutal. We all knew that none of us would ever salute

a French officer. No one travelled on the railway which was run by the French. Several Germans helped them and we considered them to be traitors. To use the railway would

have been treason in our eyes.

A description of the French occupation of the Ruhr in 1923. It comes from a book called “Why Hitler Came to Power”

by an SA Officer, published in 1938.

CLICK ON A CIRCLE FOR MORE INFORMATION

Page 11: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 12: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 13: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 14: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 15: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 16: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 17: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 18: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 19: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 20: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 21: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:

This account would be of some use to someone studying the French occupation of the Ruhr. The source tells us of the “misery” during this time. After failing to pay the reparations owed to France under the Treaty of Versailles, the industrial region of the Ruhr was occupied by French troops. The source tells us of what life was like at this time, of how “food became scarce, and the behaviour of the French army was brutal.”

It also talks of how “none of us would ever salute a French officer” or use “the railway which was run by the French”. This is talking of Passive Resistance, the government’s response to the Occupation of the Ruhr, where German citizens refused to cooperate with the French troops.

However, we must be careful when using this source to learn about the French occupation of the Ruhr. It was written by an SA officer as a part of a book on “Why Hitler came to power”. The SA were Hitler’s personal army, fiercely loyal to Hitler, and determined to further the cause of the Nazis. Also, by 1938 the Nazis were firmly in control of all forms of Media, and only books which put the Nazis in a positive light were acceptable. Therefore we know that this source could potentially be biased, and when it talks of those who helped the French as “traitors”, or as committing “treason”. So although this source does contain some interesting information regarding the French occupation of the Ruhr, you cannot completely trust it because of who wrote it.

This account would be of some use to someone studying the French occupation of the Ruhr. The source tells us of the “misery” during this time. After failing to pay the reparations owed to France under the Treaty of Versailles, the industrial region of the Ruhr was occupied by French troops. The source tells us of what life was like at this time, of how “food became scarce, and the behaviour of the French army was brutal.”

It also talks of how “none of us would ever salute a French officer” or use “the railway which was run by the French”. This is talking of Passive Resistance, the government’s response to the Occupation of the Ruhr, where German citizens refused to cooperate with the French troops.

However, we must be careful when using this source to learn about the French occupation of the Ruhr. It was written by an SA officer as a part of a book on “Why Hitler came to power”. The SA were Hitler’s personal army, fiercely loyal to Hitler, and determined to further the cause of the Nazis. Also, by 1938 the Nazis were firmly in control of all forms of Media, and only books which put the Nazis in a positive light were acceptable. Therefore we know that this source could potentially be biased, and when it talks of those who helped the French as “traitors”, or as committing “treason”. So although this source does contain some interesting information regarding the French occupation of the Ruhr, you cannot completely trust it because of who wrote it.

Page 22: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:

CLICK TO SEE THE ANSWER AGAIN

Page 23: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:

This account would be of some use to someone studying the French occupation of the Ruhr. The source tells us of the “misery” during this time. After failing to pay the reparations owed to France under the Treaty of Versailles, the industrial region of the Ruhr was occupied by French troops. The source tells us of what life was like at this time, of how “food became scarce, and the behaviour of the French army was brutal.”

It also talks of how “none of us would ever salute a French officer” or use “the railway which was run by the French”. This is talking of Passive Resistance, the government’s response to the Occupation of the Ruhr, where German citizens refused to cooperate with the French troops.

However, we must be careful when using this source to learn about the French occupation of the Ruhr. It was written by an SA officer as a part of a book on “Why Hitler came to power”. The SA were Hitler’s personal army, fiercely loyal to Hitler, and determined to further the cause of the Nazis. Also, by 1938 the Nazis were firmly in control of all forms of Media, and only books which put the Nazis in a positive light were acceptable. Therefore we know that this source could potentially be biased, and when it talks of those who helped the French as “traitors”, or as committing “treason”. So although this source does contain some interesting information regarding the French occupation of the Ruhr, you cannot completely trust it because of who wrote it.

This account would be of some use to someone studying the French occupation of the Ruhr. The source tells us of the “misery” during this time. After failing to pay the reparations owed to France under the Treaty of Versailles, the industrial region of the Ruhr was occupied by French troops. The source tells us of what life was like at this time, of how “food became scarce, and the behaviour of the French army was brutal.”

It also talks of how “none of us would ever salute a French officer” or use “the railway which was run by the French”. This is talking of Passive Resistance, the government’s response to the Occupation of the Ruhr, where German citizens refused to cooperate with the French troops.

However, we must be careful when using this source to learn about the French occupation of the Ruhr. It was written by an SA officer as a part of a book on “Why Hitler came to power”. The SA were Hitler’s personal army, fiercely loyal to Hitler, and determined to further the cause of the Nazis. Also, by 1938 the Nazis were firmly in control of all forms of Media, and only books which put the Nazis in a positive light were acceptable. Therefore we know that this source could potentially be biased, and when it talks of those who helped the French as “traitors”, or as committing “treason”. So although this source does contain some interesting information regarding the French occupation of the Ruhr, you cannot completely trust it because of who wrote it.

Page 24: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION:
Page 25: How useful is this account of the French occupation of the Ruhr? Use the source and your knowledge to explain your answer. THE QUESTION: