how to upgrade a country?

19
How to upgrade a country? IPv6 in Sweden Marco Hogewoning | February 2017 | ISOC-SE

Upload: ripe-ncc

Post on 20-Mar-2017

37 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

How to upgrade a country?

IPv6 in Sweden

Marco Hogewoning | February 2017 | ISOC-SE

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 2

IPv6 In The World

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 3

Europe

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 4

Northern Europe

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 5

You came second…

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 6

Finland 15.82% Norway 13.25%Sweden 4.05% Denmark 3.49%

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 7

Up And To The Right

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 8

Swedish Market

There is a lot of IPv6 in Sweden

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 9

Swedish Market

Top 3 combined are 10 times bigger than the 4th on this list

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 10

Size Matters

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 11

The challenge

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 12

Theory: “Diffusion”

You are here

Want to be here

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 13

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 14

Incentivise the Market Leaders?

• Financial pressure • Increase in revenue or profit margin

• Competitive pressure • Feature parity to not be left behind

• Public pressure • Name and shame them

• Regulatory pressure • If you have no choice left…

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 15

Financial Pressure

• IPv6 remains a hard business case • Substantial investments can be required

• Software licenses for various systems

• OSS/BSS changes (volume based billing)

• Replacing large amounts of CPE

• Core networks are less of a problem

• IPv4 is getting more expensive as well

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 16

Competitive Pressure

• Seen this work in many countries • Once you have one big deployment

• But you still need one of them to move

• Side effects to other sectors • Content usually follows the eye balls

• Gives people a chance to circumvent IPv4/CGN

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 17

Public Pressure

• Measurements providing transparency • Who has and who hasn’t?

• Most customers do not have a choice • Make them aware of the issues with IPv4 and NAT

Marco Hogewoning | ISOC-SE | February 2017 18

Regulatory Pressure

• Regulate where you must… • Some people call this market failure

• IPv4 address sharing is causing issues • LEA is already asking for a ban on CGN

• In Belgium a voluntary approach worked: • Code of Conduct with major access providers

• Maximum of 16 users behind a single IPv4 address

• 60% of the users now has a working IPv6 address

Thank [email protected]