how to prepare a proposal for h2020 collaborative projects universitat pompeu fabra research service...
TRANSCRIPT
How to prepare a proposal for H2020 collaborative projects
UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA
Research Service
May 2014
BEFORE YOU START
Servei de RecercaAbril 2014
Keys to prepare a proposal Having a clear idea of the project specific objectives and expected
results;
Verify the level of innovation of the idea go beyond the state of the art;
Establish the ideal consortia;
Obtain support from the institution UPF Research Service;
Plan.
Research ServiceMay 2014
Search for calls: Participant Portal
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal//desktop/en/home.html
Research ServiceMay 2014
List of all open calls
Search calls by key words
Research Service
May 2014
Open calls
Research ServiceMay 2014
Filter by type of project
Pillar to which the call belongs
Deadline of the call
Title of call
Official reference
Topics: available research lines
Information on call
Research ServiceMay 2014
Buscar convocatòries per paraules clau
Title of call
Official reference
Research line within call
Keyword
Research ServiceMay 2014
Specific challenge
How they want the challenge solved: budget, specific conditions...
What needs to be achieved
Type of project
Informació d’una convocatòria
Research ServiceMay 2014
PREPARING THE PROPOSAL
Research ServiceMay 2014
How to start Ensure that the project fits within the call;
Prepare a good synthesis of the project (abstract);
Define the profile of the necessary partners and look for them;
Plan;
START!
Contact the Research Service
Research ServiceMay 2014
Fundamental tool to “sell” your project;
Encompasses the project and its area;
How the project fits in the call specificities;
Mentions the potential impact of the project;
It can be used to identify which consortium will be needed.
• Search for partners;
• Check with National Contact Points whether the project fits in the objectives of the call.
The abstract
Research ServiceMay 2014
The consortium
Items to consider:
Experience and technical and scientific know-how;
Entities: universities, research centres, SMEs, NGOs, institutes, government agencies...
Geographical distribution: > 3 EU countries should be represented;
What can each partner provide? Infrastructures, management, knowledge;
Principal consortium
• Core of the project;• Basic partners to build the
project;• With previous joint work
experience (preferred).
Global consortium
• Implements the project;• It has to comply with all
requirements of call;• Representative composition of
EU.
Research ServiceMay 2014
Search for partners
Personal and/or professional contacts;
National Contact Points (experts for each topic);
CORDIS:
• Search for partners
• Partners or coordinators from previous projects
Infodays;
Specialised websites for each knowledge area:
• Social challenge 1 (Health)
Research ServiceMay 2014
Back to the Participant Portal
The full submission is online
Research ServiceMay 2014
Contact the Research Service
Deadline of call
Acronym and summary of project. They can be modified anytime
Research ServiceMay 2014
One proposal, two parts
Part A: •A1: general information•A2: information on partners•A3: budget (for each partner and total)•A4: ethical aspects
Part B1: • Scientific excellence• Impact• Implementation of project
Part B2: •Description of consortium• Ethical and security aspects
Part B3 (if applicable): • Ethical annex
Research ServiceMay 2014
Part AFor the coordinador and partners, the data must coincide with Part B.
At UPF w
e will
do it fro
m the
Research
Service
Research ServiceMay 2014
Part B
Clear description of the project objectives, work plan, expected impacte, consortium...
The template that can be found at the Participant Portal must be followed;
The idicated format must be respected:
• Size of font: minimum 11;
• A4 page with 15 mm margins;
• Limit of pages in each section.
Put yourself in the evaluator’s shoes:
• Make an attractive and easy to read proposal: graphs, tables, diagrams;
• Write in standard English (evaluators come from all around the EU).
Research ServiceMay 2014
Scientific Excellence
1.1 Objectives: define scientific objectives based on the expected impact
1.2 How it relates to the work programme
1.3 Concept and scientific approach:
• Describe the global concapt and the most representative ideas;
• Mention interdisciplinary elements;
• Define the global strategy, work plan, methodology... graphs
1.4 Ambition
• Detail the state of the art and how the project goes beyond it;
• Which innovations does the project provide compared to other projects;
• Mention potential scientific/technological risks related to the project.
Research ServiceMay 2014
2.1 Expected impact:
• Define how the project will achieve impact established in the work program. The impact must be quantified to the extent possible;
• Describe obstacles and regulations that could diminish impact.
2.2 Mesures to maximize impact:
• Dissemination and result exploitation:
Establish a dissemination plan and result exploitation during and at the end of the project: publications, congresses, web, associations...
Publications must be in Open Access;
Management of intellectual property: Consortium Agreement.
• Communication strategy: it is important that knowledge will be transferred to non-scientific or academic public.
Impact
Research ServiceMay 2014
It is compulsory that H2020 beneficiaries deposit all scientific publications within the H2020 financed research in open access
In the social challenge VI calls, it is compulsory to deposit in open access all research data produced within the project framework.
Open Access
Research ServiceMay 2014
Beneficiares of Horizon 2020 grants should:
• Ensure open access of all peer-reviewed papers accepted for journal publication
• As soon as possible, within 6 months (or 12 months for SSH)
• At an OpenAire complaint institutional repository
OA to publications mandate in H2020
Submit publication to journal of choice
• OA = good! (but not necessary )
• Publishing fees are considered eligible grant expense
Deposit open access version in
repository
• Almost all publishers allow this!
• Embargo’s are allowed
OpenAIRE harvests publications from
network
• Makes them visible through OpenAIRE portal
• Researchers use the persistent identifier (handle URL) for their reports
1 2 3
At the paper, ensure the correction of:
- Author’s name
- Affiliation
- Name of the action, acronym and grant number (Acknowledge / Sponsorship)
Exemple: This work has been supported by the XXXX project,
grant agreement number YYYY, funded by the EC Seventh Framework
Programme theme FP7-ENERGY-XXXX.
Before publication
26Devon Greyson, University of British Columbia
Choosing a journal
University of Essexhttp://www.essex.ac.uk/reo/research_community/
university_of_essex_research_repository/open_access/
How to achieve open access
Logistics of OA for Authors
1. Identifying Gold/Green journals1. Sherpa/Romeo2. Journal websites (“for authors” section)3. Ask the library
2. Navigating CopyrightAsk about options, most publishers will grant some
rights (via APCs payments)
3. Deposit at institutional repositorySend your postprint to [email protected]
http://repositori.upf.edu/
Submitted• Preprint• Before peer-
review
Accepted• Postprint• After peer-
review
Published• PDF• Editor
version
Publication version
It’s very important that you keep a copy of your work
• Pay attention to the publisher’s agreements
• Use SHERPA/RoMEO website to know about publishers policies http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/
• Save a copy of your pre-prints and post-prints
• License your works with when possible
• Ask the library!
More information:
• EC Guidelines on Open Access in H2020 https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/horizon2020/files/FactSheet_Open_Access.pdf
• Open Access Guidelines for researchers funded by the ERC http://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/file/ERC_Open_Access_Guidelines-revised_2013.pdf
• Open Access in Horizon 2020 https://www.openaire.eu/open-access-in-horizon-2020
3.1 Work plan:
• Global strategy of the work plan;
• Work packages (WP), tasks, deliverables, milestones and Gantt chart;
• Exhaustive description of each WP following the template;
• Interrelation of different components through a Perth diagram.
Implementation
Research ServiceMay 2014
Work Package
Research ServiceMay 2014
Research ServiceMay 2014
Work Packages
Research ServiceMay 2014
Work Package
3.2 Administration:
• Describe the consortium and the decision making system: Consortium Agreement;
• Risk analysis and contingency plans.
3.3 The consortium:
• Describe the global consortium, how the common work will be carried out, control and management mechanisms...
• Capacity of the consortium to achieve objectives;
• Complementarity among participants.
Implementation
Research ServiceMay 2014
Consortium description
Each partner of the consortium describes what they contribute with and that their presence is essential:
• Description of the institution and the main tasks that will carry out, detailing how these relate to their profile;
• Detail the profit that the project generates the scientific team;
• Curriculum Vitae or description of the main members of the team;
• A maximum of 5 publications related to the project objective;
• A maximum of 5 participations in other projects related with this one;
• Detail available infrastructure that might be essential for the objectives.
There is no page limit.
Research ServiceMay 2014
Consortium description
Research ServiceMay 2014
Implementation 3.4 Resources:
• Detail the work and capital effort contact with the R.S.
ALWAYS contact the Research Service to prepare the budget, both for partners and coordinators.
Calculate the budget based in total costs. Always check that:• The resources have to fit the real needs of the project;• Personnel costs (work and capital) reflect the task distribution by partner;• The cost breakdown has to be well structured for activities and
participants;• The equipment acquisition and subcontracting must be justified;• The inclusion of every partner in the project is well justified.
Research ServiceMay 2014
Budget Which expenses are eligible?
• Own and contracted personnel (PI + team);
• Equipment;
• Travel, research stays, assistance to congresses, conferences...
• Organization of conferences, congresses...
• Publications (Open Access)
Compulsory expense: whenever the EC funds over 325.000€ there must be a financial audit. Its cost is paid by the project;
Proposals with an “inflated” budget will be poorly evaluated.
ALWAYS contact the Research Service
Research ServiceMay 2014
Ethics
Mention any ethical aspect that there might be:
• Use of personal data, either collected within the project or re-using previous data;
• Studies involving children;
• Animal research;
• Participation of countries outside the EU;
• Military potential;
• Others.
There is no page limit.
Research ServiceMay 2014
THE EVALUATION
Research ServiceMay 2014
Evaluation criteria Excellence:
• Clarity of objectives;• Soundness of concepts, bearing in mind the interdisciplinary nature;• Credibility of approach;• Go beyond the state of the art.
Impact:• The expected impact for each topic, depending on the work program;• Improvement of the innovation capacity and integration of new
knowledge;• Efficacy of proposals and dissemination of the project and results
exploitation. Quality and efficiency of implementation
• Coherence and efficacy of the work plan, including the distribution of tasks and resources;
• Quality, experience and complementarity among participants and of global consortium;
• Quality of management of the project and risk control.
Research Service
May 2014
IMPORTANT!! Proposals are evaluated by at least 3 experts, although in most cases there
will be more than 5.
Experts have strict guidelines:
• Ignore pages beyond the limit;
• Evaluate the proposal as is presented, without considering the potential it might have if some small changes were made.
In H2020 there will not be a lot of margin for evaluators to make recommendations to improve the proposals, even regarding the budget.
Research ServiceMay 2014
ONCE THE PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED...
Research ServiceMay 2014
The outcome...
Notification of the result of the evaluation: up to 5 months after the call closure;
Negotiation with the EC: up to 3 more months;
Beginning of the project: up to 12 months after the signature of the contract.
Research ServiceMay 2014
Conclusions
The objectives must be described clearly and understandably;
The objectives must fit within the topic;
The consortium must be strong and balanced;
The work plan must be realistic and complete;
Try to quantify the expected impact;
A realistic and feasible result exploitation strategy must be included;
Use clear and simple language;
Use visual tools (graphs, diagrams...) to facilitate the evaluators’ work;
Plan your work: the elaboration of a proposal takes time!
The abstract is the essence of the project: it must attract the evaluator;
Use the Research Service and the National Contact Points.
Research ServiceMay 2014
UPF RESEARCH SERVICE
Research ServiceMay 2014
Thank you for your attention
WE ARE AT YOUR DISPOSAL!