how to detect early atherosclerosis ; focusing on techniques · fmd (endothelial function), % =...
TRANSCRIPT
How to detect early
atherosclerosis
; focusing on techniques
Jang-Ho Bae, MD., PhD.
Heart Center
Konyang University Hospital
Daejeon city, S. Korea
Surrogates for Atherosclerosis
Measures of endothelial function
Measures of arterial wall structure
Generalized measures of inflammation
Prognostic Value of Systemic
Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients
With Acute Coronary Syndromes
198 patients with ACS
Cardiovascular events
cardiovascular death
myocardial infarction
ischemic stroke
Assessment of systemic vasoreactivity
provides important prognostic
information
(n=31)
Fichtlscherer S et al. Circulation. 2004;110:1926-1932
Methods assessing endothelial function
Invasive
Coronary angiography using Doppler wire
Strain guage plethysmography
Noninvasive
Flow-Mediated brachial artery Dilation
first introduced in 1992 by Dr. Celermajer.
Basic principle of noninvasive method
for testing endothelial function
Hyperemic
Blood Flow
Shear stress
Endothelium
Baseline
Hyperemia
Normal Endothelial Dysfunction
NO
NO
PGI2(?)NO
Vasodilatation
FMD (endothelial function), %
=Baseline Diameter
Hyperemic Diameter – Baseline Diameter 100
Overnight fasting (8~12 hrs)
A quiet, temperature-controlled room
Medicine withheld for at least four half-lives, if possible
Consider the subject`s mestrual cycle
Affecting factors; temperature, food, drugs, sympathetic stimuli
Guidelines for FMD of the Brachial Artery
(Subject preparation)
Corretti MC et al. JACC 2002;39:257-65
Why Overnight Fasting ?
120100806040200-20-40
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
GROUP
Low-fat
High-fat
Changes of serum triglycerides
(delta mg/dl)
Ch
an
ge
s o
f %
dia
me
ter
ch
an
ge
(de
lta
%) y= 0.74x - 0.971
r= - 0.650
p= 0.002
120100806040200-20-40
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
.5
0.0
-.5
-1.0
Changes of serum triglycerides
(delta mg/dl)
Su
pe
rox
ide
an
ion
form
atio
n
(de
lta
nm
ol/1
06
ce
lls/m
in)
y= 0.1698x + 0.296
r= 0.798
P< 0.001
Changes of superoxide anion formation
(delta nmol/106 cells/min)
3.02.52.01.51.0.50.0-.5-1.0
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
y= - 2.608x - 0.969
r= - 0.784
P< 0.001
Bae JH et al. Atherosclerosis 2001;155:517-23
120100806040200-20
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
GROUP
low fathigh fat
Changes of serum triglycerides
(delta mg/dl)
r = 0.664p = 0.004n = 17y = 0.198x-0.615
120100806040200-20
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
Changes of serum triglycerides
(delta mg/dl)
r = -0.488p = 0.040n = 18y = -0.0302x+1.5675
Ch
an
ge
s o
f
% d
iam
ete
r c
ha
ng
e(d
elta
%)
GROUP
low fat
high fat
210-1-2-3
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
r = -0.419
p = 0.094
n = 17
y = -0.9377x+0.6023
Acute Effects of Vasoactive Drug on FMD
Gokce N et al. JACC 2002;40:761-5
Recent administration of nonnitrate vasoactive drugs
has no significant effects on FMD
SBPFMD
NMD
In Normal Subjects
Measurements;
Baseline and 3 hrs after medicine Holding 24hrs 3hr
Menstrual Cycle on FMD
Gokce N et al. JACC 2002;40:761-5
Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation varies during the menstrual cycle.
The endogenous estradiol may be involved in this menstrual cycle–related vasodilatation.
Phase ... M F L
Age, y 24.8±0.6 25.1 ±0.8 ... ...
Body mass index, kg/m2 22.4±0.41 20.5 ±0.5 ... ...
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 4.37±0.19 4.45±0.17 4.50±0.17 4.22±0.19
HDL cholesterol, mmol/L 1.63±0.15 1.68 ±0.08 1.78±0.09 1.70±0.08
LDL cholesterol, mmol/L 2.35±0.15 2.53±0.11 2.49±0.13 2.26±0.13
Triglyceride, mmol/L 1.94±0.182 1.24 ±0.07 1.20±0.09 1.29±0.10
Estradiol, pmol/L 114.5 ±9.9 121.9±12.5 632.1±74.53 533.8±33.43
Progesterone, nmol/L 1.6±0.16 1.6±0.19 3.2 ±0.60 48.7±4.84
Vascular software (2D-imaging, color and
spectral Doppler, an internal ECG monitor) and
a high-frequency vascular transducer)
For sufficient resolution, a minimum frequency
of 7 MHz
Image resolution is enhanced with broad-band
(7 to 12 MHz)
Guidelines for FMD of the Brachial Artery
(Equipment)
Corretti MC et al. JACC 2002;39:257-65
Guidelines for FMD of the Brachial Artery
(Image Acquisition)
Corretti MC et al. JACC 2002;39:257-65
Cross-sectional imaging
; can not be used
; inadequate lat wall definition
; skew artifact
M mode and A mode (wall tracking)
; more error owing to tracking drift
Anatomic landmarks
; veins and fascial planes
Guidelines for FMD of the Brachial Artery
(Endothelium-dependent FMD)
Corretti MC et al. JACC 2002;39:257-65
To create a flow stimulus in the brachial artery
Baseline5 minutes of upper (lower)
arm arterial occlusionHyperemic
45-60 s after
cuff deflation
Cuff inflation; at least 50mmHg
above SBP
Baseline diameter
Blood flow by PW
Doppler Velocity signal
Ischemia and consequent dilation
of downstream resistance vessel
via autoregulation
Guidelines for FMD of the Brachial Artery
(Endothelium-dependent FMD)
Corretti MC et al. JACC 2002;39:257-65
Position of cuff inflation; no concensus
On the upper arm;
Greater percent change in diameter
due to a greater flow stimulus resulting from
recruitment of more resistance vessels or
to direct effects of ischemia on the brachial artery
Less reliable due to image distortion by collapse of the
brachial artery and shift in soft tissue
Guidelines for FMD of the Brachial Artery
(Endothelium-dependent FMD)
Corretti MC et al. JACC 2002;39:257-65
Duration of cuff inflation
The change of BA diameter increases
as the duration of cuff inflation increases
from 30 s to 5 min.
The change in diameter is similar
after 5 and 10 min of occlusion.
Therefore, the more easily tolerated 5-min occlusion
Guidelines for FMD of the Brachial Artery
(Endothelium-dependent FMD)
Hashimoto M et al. J Pharmacol Sci. 2003;93:405-8.
Measurement of hyperemic flow in hyperemic phase
5 minutes of upper (lower)
arm arterial occlusion Hyperemic
Flow; no later than 15 s after deflation
Guidelines for FMD of the Brachial Artery
(Endothelium-dependent FMD)
Corretti MC et al. JACC 2002;39:257-65
Measurement of BA diameter in hyperemic phase
5 minutes of upper (lower)
arm arterial occlusionHyperemic
45-60 s after
cuff deflation
Why 45-60 s after cuff deflation
Image of BA in hyperemic phase;
recording continuously
from 30 s before to 2 min after deflation
Most studies; 1 min after cuff deflation
Guidelines for FMD of the Brachial Artery
(Endothelium-dependent FMD)
Why brachial artery ?
876543
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
Baseline BA diameterF
MD
r=-0.492
p<0.001
n=884
Arteries <2.5mm in diameter; difficult to measure (Radial artery)
Arteries >5.0mm in diameter; FMD is less difficult to perceive (Femoral artery)
Baseline Hyperemic
FMD=
Base BAD
Hyper BAD-Base BAD
100
Bots ML et al. EHJ 2005;26:363-8
FMD, in general
Guidelines for NMD of the Brachial Artery
(Endothelium-independent vasodilation with NTG)
Test sequence
Corretti MC et al. JACC 2002;39:257-65
Baseline 4 min after NTG
At least 10 min
rest after FMD
Exogenous NO donor
Single high dose (0.4mg)
Spray or SL NTG
To measure max vasodilatory response
Reflecting vascular smooth m function
Peak vasodilation (3-4 min)
Image; continuous recording
3-4 min after NTG
Guidelines for NMD of the Brachial Artery
(Endothelium-independent vasodilation with NTG)
Dose-response
Max vasodilatory response
at the plateau – similar
The dose required to produce
50% of the max response
- greater in patients (p<0.002)
(181ug vs.115ug)
Raitakari OT et al. AJC 2001;87:217-9
Most previous studies
; impaired FMD in atherosclerotic Pt
but preserved NMD
however, FMD associated with NMD
Impaired dilator response to NTG in CAD Pt; smooth m dysfunction
373839 343544N =
55~6445~5435~44
.8
.7
.6
.5
SEX
female
male
Normal Risk Factor
Age (yrs)
0.58±0.090.58±0.10
p=0.912
0.61±0.11
0.65±0.12
p=0.197
0.68±0.09
0.71±0.12
p=0.334
Total n=227
.9
.8
.7
.6
.5
413742 504231N =
55~6445~5435~44Age (yrs)
Total n=243
p=0.003
p<0.001
0.61±0.1
0.69±0.1
0.72±0.1
0.67±0.2
0.72±0.1
0.77±0.1
p=0.014
Korean IMT Study
Bae JH et al. Korean Society of Hypertension (supp) 2004:124-5
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Years
Cu
mu
lati
ve
Eve
nt-
Fre
e R
ate
(%)
O’Leary et al. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:14-22.
Systemic Atherosclerosis: Carotid
Disease as a Marker of CV Risk
1st Quintile IMT
2nd Quintile IMT
3rd Quintile IMT
4th Quintile IMT
5th Quintile IMT
Cumulative Event-Free Rates for MI or Stroke, According
to Quintile of Combined IMT (n=4476), 65 years of age or older.
AHA recommendation for evaluation of risk in primary prevention out of the various noninvasive imaging
; Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT)
Carotid IMT
; independent assessment of coronary risk
;independent predictor of coronary events in patients with CAD.
Smith SC et al. AHA conference proceedings. 2000;101:111-116
Chan SY et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1037-43.
Carotid IMT
Measures of Arterial Wall
Intima Media Thickness (QIMT)
Safe standardized and validated method
Direct assessment of disease
Reproducible
Easy to learn
Relatively inexpensive
CLAS colestipol and niacin IMT 1cm below bulb is
(1994) reproducible and has
correlation with CV events
MARS lovastatin confirmed above
(1994)
PLAC II pravastatin established that the most
(1995) reliable part to measure is the
far wall of the common carotid
Measures of Arterial Wall
CCA
1 cm
Manual measurement of carotid IMT
Example of carotid plaque
IMT : Semi Automatic Measurement
Good detection
Poor detection
Background of Korean
software (KS) development
for IMT measurement
Korean software (KS) for IMT measurement
Korean software (KS) for IMT measurement
Korean software for IMT measurement
Number
Age
Sex (M/F)
Height (cm)
Weight (kg)
BMI
HBP
DM
Hyperlipidemia
Smoking
Diagnosis
No atherosclerotic disease
Patients with risk factors
Atherosclerotic disease
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
Triglyceride (mg/dL)
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)
Random glucose (mg/dL)
Uric acid (mg/dL)
BUN (mg/dL)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
60
58.516
18342
14077
43.810.0
10630
13666
4.631.98
17.310.3
1.030.58
Subjects: 60 consecutive
subjects undergoing
routine TTE
IMT: by M`ATH
(blinded examiner)
by Korean software
(KRISS)
Compare Pearson correlation
coefficients between age and
the data of M`ATH and Korean
software
Korean software (KS) for IMT measurement
908070605040302010
1.1
1.0
.9
.8
.7
.6
.5
.4
y=0.3925 + 0.0059x
r=0.616
p<0.001
n=60
IMT
by M
`AT
H
Age (yrs)
IMT
by K
S908070605040302010
1.2
1.1
1.0
.9
.8
.7
.6
.5
.4
y=0.4056 + 0.0054x
r=0.537
p<0.001
n=56
Age (yrs)
Comparison of Pearson correlation coefficients by both methods
Korean software for IMT measurement
Intim
a th
ickness b
y K
S
Age (yrs)
Media
thic
kness
by K
S90807060504030
.8
.7
.6
.5
.4
.3
90807060504030
.42
.40
.38
.36
.34
.32
Age (yrs)
y=0.2416 + 0.0040x
r=0.507
p<0.05
n=17
Correlation between age and intima or media thickness
FMD, IMT, and PWV
421518N =
CADrisk factornormal
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
p=0.000
p=0.003
431518N =
CADrisk factornormal
1.0
.9
.8
.7
p=0.005
Bae JH et al. Korean Circulation J 2004;34:845-55
Age- and sex- matched study population
431618N =
CADrisk factornormal
1700
1600
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
p=0.000
p=0.023
FMD, IMT, and PWV
Bae JH et al. Korean Circulation J 2004;34:845-55
2200200018001600140012001000800
10
8
6
4
2
0
PWV (cm/sec)
n=75
p=0.007
r=-0.329
2200200018001600140012001000800
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
.9
.8
.7
.6
n=76
p=0.000
r=0.396
n=76
p=0.007
r=0.310
1086420
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
.9
.8
.7
.6
FMD (%)PWV (cm/sec)
These are related to each other,
the combination of these measurement will be of stronger clinical relevance
In Conclusion
FMD, IMT, and PWV are functional and structural surrogates of the atherosclerotic process.
Limitations of FMD; variable reproducibility, influenced by exogenous factors.
Future; need to reveal an association of improvement in response to treatment with improvement in prognosis
Fathi R et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:616-23
The Relative Importance of Vascular Structure
and Function in Predicting Cardiovascular Events
IMT LV Mass FMD
Kaplan-Meier curves for event-free survival
<0.62mm
>0.71mm
<181g
>276g
>6.3%
<2%
CV events; death, MI, admission with ACS, stroke, revascularization
444 patients with CAD, dialysis, or multiple risk factors
Follow-up; 24 months
IMT was the independent vascular factor
for mortality, even in the subgroup with
no CAD and low risk.
Can We Restore the Endothelial Dysfunction in
Patients with Essential Hypertension with
Calcium Channel Blockers?
Bae JH et al. Korean Circulation J 2000;30:1010-6
0
5
10
15
20
Control HBP CAD
FM
D (
%)
NSP<0.001
P<0.001
0
5
10
15
Baseline Follow up
P<0.01
The Difference of Endothelial Function
According to the Presence of Restenosis
in Patients Undergoing PCI
Bae JH et al. Korean Circulation J 2001;31:1117-1122
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Restenosis Patent
P=0.013
Impaired flow-mediated dilation and risk
of restenosis in patients undergoing
coronary stent implantation.
Patti G et al. Circulation 2005;11:7005
136 patients undergoing stenting
ISR; 20 pts (15%)
Singh TP et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:661-5
Time Sequence of Atherosclerosis
Surrogates Abnormality
Endothelial dysfunction precedes an
increase in carotid IMT
31 diabetic children (15 yrs old, 6.8 yrs DM duration), 35 age-matched healthy children
No difference in carotid IMT
0.85 0.89 0.880.86
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
Statins Control
Bae JH et al. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2004;9:185-92
105 statin group and 100 control group undergoing stenting
6 months follow up
Statin improves endothelial
dysfunction, not carotid IMT in patients
undergoing stenting
3.94 4.224.84 4.34
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Statins Control
P=0.008 P=0.435
FM
D (
%)
P=0.435 P=0.530
IMTcca
(m
m)
Time Sequence of the Improvement of
Atherosclerosis Surrogates Abnormality