how tma services are shifting the tdm landscape in waterloo region engraining tdm in policy,...
TRANSCRIPT
How TMA Services are Shifting the TDM Landscape in Waterloo Region
Engraining TDM in Policy, Programming, and Planning
Mathew Thijssen, MASustainable Waterloo Region@mathew_thijssenlinkedin.con/in/mathewthijssen
James LaPointe, MA., RPP, MCIPRegion of Waterloo@jlapointe_tdmlinkedin.com/in/jamestlapointe
Before Survey #2
The Context | Growth!
2010 2011 2012 2013 20140
5
10
15
20
25
30
27
10 1216
2
6
66
72
4
Private Public Non-Profit
Tota
l M
em
bers
hip
Before Survey #2
The Context | Paid Membership
Sliding scale for membership costs:
• Membership revenue covers about 30%• Gives members a bit more “skin in the game”• Clarity of business case is key
Before Survey #2
The Context | What We Do• Discounted Transit
Passes• gotravelwise.ca• Emergency Ride Home
Before Survey #2
TMA Challenges | Momentum
• Captive business audience
• 50% of members are joint
• Part of a community movement
• Highlights importance
Before Survey #2
TMA Challenges | Scaling• Biggest budget item is staff time
• If we try and have a ratio of 1:20, it’s tough
Before Survey #2
Credibility | Third Party
• Establishes a semi-independent brand:
▫ Strength of association with Regional/City government
▫ More flexibility to adapt to demand
▫ A different image and level of trust from commuters
Before Survey #2
Credibility | Good Data is Key
• In 2014, we collected 5,200 data points (over 20% of TMA responses)
• Want to use this data to show opportunities for employers and for community infrastructure
Informing Regional Decision Making
- TMA data are leading to improved decision making for mode-specific endeavors - Segmented marketing for transit
- Informed infrastructure prioritization
- Building into policy goals
- Aligning with “big data”
Integration in Planning Process
Scaled Services have allowed numerous
TDM-solutions to be integrated with planning
development application approvals
- TDM Checklists & Parking Reductions Worksheets
- Minimum “TDM-ness” of developments and TDM
plans
- Seeping into additional professional portfolios,
authorities, and jurisdictions
Before Survey #2
The Ongoing Struggles
• How do we keep building participation from our members?
• How do we expand services available for members?
• How do we balance competing stakeholders and priorities? (non-profit, 3 cities, Regional government)
• How do we balance member priorities knowing that everyone is unique?
• How do we deal with stragglers, or members who aren’t engaged?
• How do we engage with developers?
The Ongoing Struggles• How to boost participation (in general)
• Additional services—question for staff??
• Stakeholder engagement—great when it works, overlapping responsibilities, streamlining without stepping on people’s toes?
• Identifying member priorities knowing that everyone is unique?
• Stragglers???
• Developer category?
• Executing services / answering explaining services as part of TDM requirements – additional professional liasoning with transportation planning / spreading tdm staff time thinner between a variety of departments
• Legal agreements – complexity in categories of service and administration
• Economic development,
• Growth and inclusion in additional policy – difficult to maintain focus and