how it looks if decisions are made from memory
DESCRIPTION
How it looks if decisions are made from memory. Arndt Bröder & Stefanie Schiffer (2003) Department of Psychology, University of Bonn [email protected] Thanks to: Jutta Bierwirth, Arvid Herwig, Andrea Kurth, Susanne Neufang & Nathalie Ziegler (data collection) DFG (funding). Overview. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
How it looks if decisions are made from memory
Arndt Bröder & Stefanie Schiffer (2003)Department of Psychology, University of Bonn
Thanks to:Jutta Bierwirth, Arvid Herwig, Andrea Kurth, Susanne Neufang &
Nathalie Ziegler (data collection)DFG (funding)
2
Overview
The Adaptive Toolbox idea Take The Best and other heuristics The „Memory Search“-Hypothesis
Experiment 1: Pilot study Experiment 2: Memory vs. screen
The Format-Hypothesis Experiment 3: representational format
Summary & Perspective
3
1. The Adaptive Toolbox
Gigerenzer & Selten (2001) view the human mind as an „adaptive toolbox“ with domain-specific simple heuristics that follow simple decision rules („fast“), need little information („frugal“), and are applied adaptively.
4
Open questions (selection):
Selection mechanism for heuristics? („meta-rule“)
Status of toolbox: Theory? Framework? Applicability? Empirical Predicitions?
Empirical evidence?
5
2. The „Take The Best“-Heuristic Domain: probabilistic inferences with uncertain
knowledge
Which way leads to the city center: Left or right? Which share will be more profitable: Volkswagen or BMW? Which nation has a higher per capita GDP: Norway or Spain? Which city has more inhabitants: Heidelberg or Bonn? Which food contains more cholesterol: Fish `n Chips or pumpkin
pie? etc.
Make a „best guess“ according to probabilistic cue knowledge
How is the cue knowledge integrated?
6
Example Which European country has the higher per capita GDP?
Take The Best (TTB): „Spain“ Noncompensatory, little info required, ordinal cue weighting
Weighted Additive Strategy (COMP): „Norway“ Compensatory, high info requirement, absolute cue weighting
Majority Rule (EWL): „Norway“ Compensatory, medium info requirement, no cue weighting
Cue Spain NorwayMember of European Union? yes no
Unemployment rate <10% ? no yes
Trade balance positive ? no yes
Inflation <3% ? no yes
7
TTB: Empirical Evidence
Few Studies concerning TTB & LEX: Rieskamp & Hoffrage (1999) Bröder (2000 ; JEP:LMC) Newell, Weston & Shanks (2001) Läge, Christen & Daub (2002) Newell & Shanks (2003; JEP:LMC) Newell, Rakow, Weston & Shanks (in press) Bröder (in press, JEP:LMC)
(COARSE-GRAINED!) SUMMARY: TTB appears to belong to the toolbox. The „default“, however, seems to be a compensatory strategy
which is only abandoned in the case of high information costs (relative to gains)
8
3. The „Memory Search“-Hypothesis The standard experimental paradigm in multi-attribute decision
research (Structural Modeling as well as Process Tracing) consists of presenting all relevant attribute information to the participant.
Gigerenzer & Todd‘s criticism (1999): "we refer to this type of task as inference from givens, as
opposed to inference from memory or inference from the external environment, both of which require search. (...) [E]xperiments in which search is obviated are unsuitable for testing models of ecological and bounded rationality that rely on limited information search as a central component." (p. 23)
MSH: TTB (and other fast and frugal heuristics) will be used when inference is from memory
9
My criticism:
The authors do not even give a hint how this memory search hypothesis could be tested empirically.
Therefore, this looks like an attempt to make the „fast and frugal“ framework immune to empirical critique!
Increasing the precision of a hypothesis involves delineating constraints and deriving new predictions.
10
Methodical problems & solutions:
Problem 1: Participants‘ knowledge base must be known to the experimenter Participants learn attribute patterns of objects
by heart
Problem 2: How can strategies be inferred when (a) response errors are allowed and (b) Process Tracing is impossible? Bayesian model selection method based on
likelihood of empirical choice vectors, given the models (=measurement model)
11
Paradigm Criminal story:
A popular singer was murdered by one of his 10 former lovers...
12
LEARNING PHASE
(10 suspects with 4attributes each)
Build up knowledgebase in memory
Information about critical attributes
DECISION PHASE
Integrate cue infor- mation in memory
13
Experiment 1: Pilot study
Aim: Material testing: Can it be learned in a reasonable amount
of time? Do participants use TTB when deciding from memory?
Participants: 50 Students of Bonn university (35f, 15m, age 25.5)
14
Learning phase
15
Decision Phase
16
Results Experiment 1
64% (!) of participants classified as TTB users estimated reponse error rate: 18%
Strategy classifications (%)
64
12 12 12
0
10
2030
40
50
60
7080
90
100
TTB COMP EWL GUESS
17
Discussion Experiment 1
Surprisingly high rate of TTB-users seems to confirm the MSH
Caveat: Maybe a materials effect! A direct comparison of „inference from givens“ and „inference from memory“ is necessary.
18
Experiment 2: Memory vs. Screen
Design: „Inference from memory“ (replication of Study 1) vs. „Inference from givens“ (attribute information
available on the screen)
Participants: 50 Students of Bonn University (35f, 15m, age
24.1)
19
Results of Experiment 2
Less TTB-users than in Experiment 1(n.s.), but significant difference between conditions (2
(2)=6.25; p<.05; w=0.35)
Estimated response errors: 26% vs. 8% (t(48)=7.33, p<.05)
Strategy classifications
4432
168
20
60
20
00
102030405060708090
100
TTB COMP EWL GUESS
memory screen
20
Discussion concerning the MSH
The Memory Search Hypothesis of Gigerenzer & Todd (1999) was corroborated.
In line with other studies this suggests that memory search causes subjective costs which trigger the use of „fast and frugal“ heuristics
Question: Is search in memory always costly?
21
4. The Format-Hypothesis TTB is a sequential heuristic.
Sequential retrieval is plausible for a verbal or propositional information format.
Image-based formats cause simultaneous retrieval of cue information which should trigger the usual preference for compensatory decision making.
Hence: Image-based representation may be a boundary condition for MSH
22
Experiment 3: Representation format
Design (simplified): verbal Cue-Info vs. image-based Cue-Info
Realization: Presentation of items in a way encouraging
holistic image-based encoding (Stimuli: www.otto.de, virtual dressing room).
Participants: 114 Students of Bonn University and other
volunteers (76f, 38m, age:24.4)
23
Learning (1)
24
Learning (2)
25
Learning (3)
26
Learning (4)
27
Learning (5)
28
Decision Phase
29
Results Experiment 3
Difference consistent with hypothesis (2
(2)=10.98, p<.01) estimated response error: 30%
Strategy classifications
47,4
13,2 13,226,326,4 31,8 27,6
14,5
0102030405060708090
100
TTB COMP EWL GUESS
verbal image
30
5. Summary
Summary: TTB belongs to the toolbox It is especially prevalent in decisions from memory
when this information is in a verbal/propositional format.
An image-based format leads to more compen-satory DM.
„cognitive algorithms (...) cannot be divorced from the data format on which they operate“ (Gigerenzer & Hoffrage, 1995, p. 710)
31
Perspective
Future projects
How adaptive is the toolbox? Precise formulation of boundary conditions and empirical testing Influence of habits and personality differences
Closer connection between decision research and other fields of cognitive pychology
representational assumptions working memory components
32
Thank you for your attention!
33
Appendix
Critical item Types
34
Item types: Critical evidence found at scene of crime: Blood type A, Marlboro cigarettes, Chanel perfume, limousine
blood type A 0 A 0 A 0
cigarettes Marlboro Marlboro Camel Marlboro Marlboro Marlboro
perfume Chanel Chanel Egoiste Chanel Chanel Chanel
vehicle convertible motorbike motorbike motorbike convertible limousine
TTB=COMP=EWL TTB≠(COMP=EWL) TTB=COMP; EWL=?
35
Does an image-based format exist?
Pro:
Con:
"BAUM"
Compromise: There is a special format of representation which also contains propositional information (Kosslyn, 1994). It is not a photograph-like copy of the physical world.