how effective middle managers get people onto the same page

8/3/2019 How Effective Middle Managers Get People Onto the Same Page

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-effective-middle-managers-get-people-onto-the-same-page 1/7

How

G

A ne

“…expl

and chaLes Dakenretired SV

w Eff

Get Pe

leade

ins extrellenging d s HR, CN Rail

fectiv

eople

Joh

ship to

ely well ifficulty...

Montreal, C

ve M

e ont

hn K

l for th

common

anada

MIDD

to th

Kuy

e Toug

DLE M

he SA

ype

est Ro

M AN

AM E

ers

letm in m

NAG

PAG

anage

ERS

GE

ent!



The

Thi

in t

ho

mid

the

1.

Su

rep

sub

del

inf

Su

wa

yo

Fri

Fri

wo

do

wis

the

Su

ma

san

her

exe

Se

lev

For

not

diff

7 Performan

T

article introd

e sandwich’

defining deci

‐level organiz

author of thre

The

Role

the middle

ort to be c

ordinate kno

yed,” he sai

rmation for

sighed. Bob

known to s

think you’ll

ay,” came

th

ay, she tho

king on the

e in time fo

h Bob would

priorities of

h is life for t

nagement.

dwich’ of the

role is to tr

cutional exc

ior manager

ls control ho

entrepreneu

‐for‐profits,

erence. Thes

e Drivers: Ho

e Ho

Ge

ces a new lea

hat has to del

sion‐making a

tion builder a

books on lea

f a Middle

manager w

mpleted.

cked on he

. “Bob aske

is board mee

was her bos

ep in witho

be able to ge

e response.

ght with ex

eekend if I

Tuesday’s

talk to me fi

y people!

e middle m

his level of

organization

nslate senio

ellence with

s want goals

well that h

rs and leade

he challenge

e leaders are

w Effective Mi

Pew Eff

Peo

ership tool fo

iver results wi

uthority upfro

d leadership

ership and sel

anager

s waiting ex

t the appoi

door. “My

me to work

ting so I had t

s, the gener

t warning. “

t it to me?”

asperation.

ant to get

anagement

rst, before he

nager – the

manager is t

. In a larger

r manageme

the layers

and plans a

ppens.

s of smaller

is similar b

both the mid

ddle Manager

for ctive

le onby J

helping mid ‐l

th limited con

t gets everyo

oach. He is a

‐development

pectantly fo

nted time,

report will

on getting h

o set it aside.

l manager.

Okay, when

Sue asked. “

hat leaves

y presentati

meeting. I j

goes changi

oughest role

e ‘meat in t

ompany, his

t strategy i

that report

hieved. Jun

businesses a

t with one k

‐ and the sen

s Get People

a Midd

to th

ohn Kuypers

vel managers

rol over how

e onto the sa

former execut

, including Wh

a

er

be

im

”

He

do

By

e

on

st

ng

in

he

or

to

in.

ior

nd

ey

ior

levelsunco

make

getti

and h

The

reput

realit

juggl

other

page.

being

nto the Same

ce le Ma

Sam

succeed at th

o get those re

me page with

ive in consum

o’s The Driver

in the

orga

fortable po

s the final ca

g people to

igh quality re

reat French

ed to have s

and give ho

senior exec

words,

they

This tough jo

the bad guy.

PEOPLE MA

THE

Page Joh

ri nage

e Pag

toughest role

sults. The 7

out being the

r products an

Anyway, publi

ization. This

sition of bei

ll but still has

buy in and e

sults. This ca

military lead

aid, ““The ro

e.” For midd

tive hopes w

need

to

getb is much eas

This article e

NAGEMENT CH

TOUGHEST AT

ww.perform

Kuypers ©2

erss

e

in manageme

erformance D

bad guy. Joh

investment b

hed by Carsw

puts

these

l

g the senio

the mid‐leve

xecute plans

be tough fo

r, Napoleon

le of a lead

le managers,

ith junior lev

everyone

oier if they ca

plains a way

LLENGES ARE

HE 3RD

LEVEL

nceshift.com

09 Page 1

:

t – the ‘meat

rivers clarifies

Kuypers is a

anking and is

ell.

eaders in

th

r leader wh

l challenge o

with passio

r owners.

Bonaparte i

r is to defin

their role is t

l realities. I

to

the

sam do it withou

to do that.

OFTEN



The

The

lea

ma

the

An

Cul

Th

dec

ana

– a

en

im

dea

ove

Dri

que

In

dir

Ca

gen

be

cre

ow

ma

un

My

thr

wa

Aft

US

pro

coll

out

poli

quewit

car

cro

str

fle

7 Performan

7 Performa

ership tool

nagement dif

basis of the t

way? Mak

ture.

re are count

ision. Surve

lyze the data

ll of these le

, however, s

lementation.

d in its track

rruled by ‘w

ers is a lead

stion.

y early 30s, I

ctor of mark

ada. It wa

eral manage

in working c

te a new ad

made‐in‐Ca

king authorit

erstood the

acceptance

atened by th

as much a m

er much coll

ad agency c

posed a wil

eagues’ appr

landish and

tically risky t

stioned. Ho

any other

fully and cle

ss‐border c

tegist, my b

me into Ne

e Drivers: Ho

ce Drivers (

hat address

ficulties: Wh

eam collabor

ing the Shif

less tools to

the custom

, measure th

ad to makin

omeone has

Until a deci

. Furthermo

ho gets to

rship tool t

experienced

eting with a

a third‐lev

r. I was faci

ollaborativel

ertising cam

nada comme

did not sit

cost‐saving r

of

the

decisi

e change an

otive as anyt

boration upf

mpetition, o

d creative i

oval. It was

doomed to

o say so, and

ever, my

in

choice. I

arly as I coul

operation

ss’s boss, th

York to expl

w Effective Mi

he 7PDs) is

s the root c

o gets to deci

tion book,

t To A Coll

help leaders

er, test mark

results, get

the ‘right’

to authorize

sion is appro

re, many ‘rig

decide.’ The

at addresses

this in a majo

major bever

l position r

g a major c

with our US

paign, rather

rcials. This s

well with m

easons behin

n was

temp

by my suspi

ing else.

ront, includi

ur winning N

dea that ca

an idea whi

ailure. I kn

I knew my m

er convictio

oiced my d

. Out of res

nd my re

e North Ame

ain my objec

ddle Manager

a collaborat

ause of mid

e? The 7PD

ho’s The Dri borative Te

make the ri

et the produ

expert opinio

ecision. In t

he decision

ed, work sto

t’ decisions

7 Performa

this underlyi

r way. I was t

ge company

porting to t

ange. I had

head office

than doing

hift in decisi

even thoug

d the decisi

ered by

feeli

ion that polit

g a Canada

w York age

ptured my

h struck me

w it would

otives would

s could

not

li

sagreement

ect for buildi

utation as

rican preside

ions.

s Get People

ive

le

is

er m

ht

ct,

ns

he

or

ps

et

ce

ng

he

in

he

to

to

ur

n‐

h I

n.

ng

ics

s.

cy

S

as

be

be

ve

as

ng

a

nt,

I felt

filled

itself.

I did s

top b

camp

large

acco

agen

achie

teste

To m

meeti

say, “

M

When

decisi

decisi

make

will

mana

unde

If yo

decisi

with

There

organ

share

nto the Same

nervous as I

with twenty

There I was

o as best as I

rass decide

aign. A mo

board

roo

nt person f

y spelled ou

ed the lowe

. The room

y surprise, n

ng. I said no

I told you so,”

ID‐LEVEL MAN

you are a mi

on, but you

on. Your a

the most of

ake or bre

ger, your a

stand this

re

succeed, y

ons and lead

assion and s

are three les

ization in thi

d decision‐m

Page Joh

walked into

eople includ

given my op

could but the

to proceed

nth later, we

to

hear

t

rom the Lo

t the results

t scores of a

as silent as t

one said a

hing either, k

that was for

AGEMENT CA

ddle manage

usually do

ility to unde

the decision‐

ak your car

bility to hel

ality of

middl

u will get t

their people

ccess.

sons for mid‐

story. First,

aking is mal

www.perfor

Kuypers ©2

the 45th flo

ing the head

ortunity to

y were not c

with testin

re‐assemble

e research

Angeles‐ba

. The test

y campaign

he presentati

ord to me

nowing this

sure! ☺

BE A FRUSTR

r, you may b

ot get to m

rstand this,

aking powe

er. If you

your mid

e manageme

em to supp

to execute y

level manag

you must be

unctioning.

anceshift.co

09 Page

r boardroo

of the agenc

ake my case

nvinced. Th

the new a

d in an eve

results.

A

sed researc

ampaign ha

they had eve

on continued

s we left th

as no time t

TING ROLE

right about

ake the fina

accept it an

r you do hav

are a senio

le manager

nt life

is

vital

ort your fina

our strategie

rs of any siz

aware of ho

Second, yo

.

.

l

.

l



The

mu

to

lift

ma

Dri

pa

2.

The

ma

hav

dis

pa

it is

to s

fro

The

aut

ma

dec

dec

get

con

of

dec

likeatti

Mi

mi

pro

mi

For

suc

do

job

Yo

Yo

“th

wa

resi

are

wit

7 Performan

st make a shi

et alignmen

he performa

ke up the th

ers in order

e without bei

hat are Th

7 Performa

kes clear who

e a say in h

ussing this u

e, they buy i

a decision w

ucceeding at

a mid‐level

7 Performan

hority scale.

king power

isions are

ision.” Insert

made pre‐e

flicts. Its eff

n election.

ided. Then

it. This

cla

tude proble

dle manage

d shift.

cesses but

dle manager

many high

ceeded at w

e. Suddenly,

is

to

help

th hire people

check qualit

right things

t to do thin

stance to yo

tough to di

becoming a

e Drivers: Ho

ft in who has

and action.

nce of those

ree steps of

to effectivel

ng the “bad

7 Performa

ce Drivers is

gets to deci

w work gets

pfront, peopl

and commi

ith which the

and enjoyin

position.

ce Drivers is

It clarifies

and to wha

ade. I call

ing this one

pts future c

ct is similar

e know in a

e accept th

rity resolves

s.

leadership

iddle mana

ot tasks.

does not pa

achievers, th

rk because i

others are d

em

succeed.

for them. Yo

y for them.

right.” Inste

gs their own

r experience

est. There i

mid‐level m

w Effective Mi

what level o

Third, you m

ou lead. The

applying Th

get people

uy.”

ce Drivers?

a leadershi

e and to wh

done by wh

e not only ge

to the final

don’t agree.

the job of m

based on a

upfront wh

t degree, b

it “The deci

xtra step int

onflicts and

o how we ac

dvance how

e outcome, e

many

com

success mus

gers manag

ike a sports

ticipate on t

is is a major

was satisfyi

ing the fun t

You

get

buu improve sy

our job is to

ad of appreci

way ‐ imag

and their re

s a loss of co

nager that h

ddle Manager

power in or

st act wisely

se three lesso

7 Performa

onto the sa

program t

t degree oth

om. By ope

onto the sa

ecision, eve

This is the k

anaging peo

ecision‐maki

has decisi

fore any fi

sion before t

how decisio

esolves curr

cept the res

he winner g

ven if we do

unication a

t begin with

e people a

coach, a go

e playing fie

letdown. Y

g to get thin

ings while y

gets

for

thetems for the

ensure they

ating that, t

ine that! Th

eated mista

ntrol that g

rts.

s Get People

er

to

ns

ce

e

at

rs

ly

e

if

ey

le

ng

n‐

al

he

ns

nt

lts

ts

n’t

nd

a

nd

od

ld.

ou

gs

ur

m.

m.

do

ey

eir

es

es

The 7

help

langu

invol

super

The

meta

Many

who

Onck

Busin

subse

of th

this t

secon

each

proje

witho

When

“driv

defau

passe

how

crash

of au

and o

and l

This

maki

leade

appre

nto the Same

Performance

ake this tra

age and a

ement the p

visor when a

PDs achiev

hor: Who’s

leadership t

is the real o

en captured t

ess Review

quent 1984 b

funniest an

pic. What’s

d important

person’s

limt or assignm

ut a 100% co

you assign

r” of the wo

lt then, you

nger – the s

well the driv

es! For this r

hority in ho

ut of

habit.

adership pro

driver‐passe

g authority

rship metho

ciates a pass

Page Joh

Drivers is a l

nsition. The

framework

erformer sho

ask, assignm

es this usin

he

driver?

roubles trac

ner or ‘driv

his reality bri

rticle, “Who

ook, Managi

most insigh

ifferent abo

player – the

its

and

obligent done. A

mitted deci

work, you ar

k. She is the

re not. If sh

akeholder.

er performs.

eason, passe

the driver

This is

a roo

blems.

ger metap

is central to

d. Like driv

enger who c

www.perfor

Kuypers ©2

adership to

7PDs provid

that clarifie

uld expect fr

ent or projec

a simple

to a lack of

er’ of the w

lliantly in his

’s Got The

g Manageme

ful books I’v

t The 7PDs is

passenger –

ations

for

gter all, no w

sion behind it

e making th

doer – the

e is the drive

passenger

You are a

gers retain a

rives, often

cause of

po

or for shar

The 7 Perfor

ing a car,

n give advic

anceshift.co

09 Page

l designed t

es a commo

how muc

om his or he

is delegated

yet powerfu

clarity abou

rk. Willia

1974 Harvar

onkey?” Hi

nt Time is on

ever read o

that it adds

and it define

tting

a

taskrk gets don

!

t person th

erformer. B

r, you are th

as a stake i

fected if sh

certain shar

unconsciousl

wer struggle

ing decision

ance Driver

a lost drive

on where t

.

l

,



The

go.

acti

she

pas

in a

or

aut

fro

cau

Wit

a s

100

dri

pas

3.

Th

inc

intan

wo

giv

irrit

evi

yo

for

7 Performan

His advice

ons of the dr

is going, d

senger tellin

uthority, wit

how to driv

hority can

le

being com

se of perfor

h The 7PDs,

aled level of

% between

er’s relative

senger at eac

hree Stages

secret to g

rporate the

your daily

l

Action. St

k to be off th

n situation.

ated by wh

ence that s

disagree.

you at work,

TH

e Drivers: Ho

gives him a

iver. Similarl

es not app

her how to

both partie

e. This mi

d the

perfor

itted to deli

ance proble

here are sev

decision‐ma

hem. The

share of

h level, as fol

to Getting P

etting peopl

hree stages

adership pr

p I: The Rift

e rails betwe

One plain‐a

t others ar

meone is m

n the other

it means y

E 7 PERFOR

ECISION AUT

w Effective Mi

hare of resp

y, a driver w

eciate an o

rive! This ref

wanting con

‐match in

er to

rebel,

r

ering great r

s for middle

n types of dri

ing authorit

umbers bel

uthority co

ows:

eople on the

onto the s

of The 7 Perf

ctices‐Awa

is to notice

n drivers and

s‐day clue is

doing. Th

aking a decis

hand, if thin

u are on th

ANCE DRIV

HORITY SCAL

ddle Manager

nsibility in t

o knows wh

erly‐controlli

lects an overl

trol over wh

ecision‐maki

esent

or

deta

sults –a cent

anagers.

vers that foll

that add up

w indicate t

pared to t

Same Page

me page is

ormance Driv

eness, Attitu

what is causi

passengers i

when you f

at is the cl

ion with whi

s are hummi

same page

RS

E

s Get People

he

re

ng

ap

re

ng

ch

ral

w

to

he

he

to

ers

de

ng

a

el

ar

ch

ng

as

those

decid

You

ask t

telltal

1. So

2. Se

3. In

4. Co

5. Pe

6. Co

7. Tr

Peopl

when

decisithis

make

exec

the li

levels

smoo

100%

Figur

Step

leade

is ca

mem

The s

Step

powe

nto the Same

around you.

e?’ Things ge

an recogniz

eir supervis

e signs:

lo Driver:

lf ‐directed D

ormative Dri

nsultative Dr

rmission Dri

mpliant Driv

ansfer Driver:

e perform i

they “drive”

on‐making

a

nd skilfully

s good midd

te and senio

nk. The foll

that “fit” Th

thly when e

committed d

e 1: Driver‐P

I of

The

7 P

rship progra

sing perfor

ers of the te

econd step i

2: The Shif

r shift and w

Page Joh

There are n

dealt with, r

e the seven

r (or others)

“I

don’t

iver: “I need

er: “Look

iver: “Can yo

er: “May I

r: “Just t

“Will y

a more co

their job res

uthority that

getting agre

le manager’s

r people deci

wing chart s

7 Performan

ch level is i

ecisions.

ssenger are

rformance D

teaches lea

ance to brea

am.

n applying T

. The 7PDs

y people de

www.perfor

Kuypers ©2

issues abou

esolved and i

driver types

for help. L

need

anyon

a resource fr

at what I’ve d

u give me so

do it this wa

ell me what t

u take over f

mitted and

ponsibilities

fits them.

ment about

successful.

de. Middle

hows the se

ce Drivers. T

alignment,

aligned at 10

ivers middle

ers how to r

k down with

e 7 Perform

explains ho

elop a ‘bad’

anceshift.co

09 Page

‘who gets t

plemented.

by how the

ook for thes

’s help.”

om you.”

one…”

e advice?”

?”

do.”

or me?”

positive wa

t the level o

nderstandin this is wha

Junior peopl

managers ar

en passenge

ings progres

adding up t

0%

managemen

cognize wha

one or mor

nce Drivers i

to make

ttitude if it i



The

not

lea

In

per

Per

yo just

this

Wh

co

bei

yo

wel

Pe

giv

adv

co

wa

wo

vet

whi

7P

wit

acc

A s

the

rev

pla

dec

is l

req

tha

Dis

7 Performan

done well.

ership insig

heory, each

formance dri

mission 40:

want

your

s tell her and

be? In pra

en people ar

fort zone, t

g unhappy o

won’t succ

l. That some

ple get upse

n to them.

ertising exa

mercials felt

taken awa

ld have the

o any decisi

ch limited m

s is people

in their limi

ept that reali

econd reaso

accepted

ised after th

at the expe

ides not to a

wered beca

uired a key st

t is entirely

agreements

e Drivers: Ho

Like a sol

ts for effecti

of us is c

ver level. If

river, then s

bordinate

to

let her run w

ctice, howev

pushed out

ey feel risk

r stressed ou

ssfully get

ne could eve

when the a

The main re

ple, letting

threatening

from me a

liked :60

ns. Instead,

to voicing

now they h

ts and oblig

y and get ba

people’s

at

ecision‐mak

e fact. For

ted Permissi

pprove it. La

se you didn’

ep that you

controlled b

bout who g

w Effective Mi

ved mystery

e middle ma

pable of op

our boss wa

art asking fo

be

a

Self ‐

dirith it. How

er, we have

ide their per

and they re

t. If you don’

eople to bu

n be you.

thority level

ason is RISK

ther

people

o my success

d I became

pprove auth

I had :50 A

y views. Th

ve done the

tions. Stag

k to a positiv

itude gets

n

ing norms

xample, yo

on 40: driver l

ter, your per

t get someth

eren’t permi

first pl

where

underst

importaempting

Attitude

aspect

perform

each of us

ts to decide

ddle Manager

, this provi

agers.

erating at a

ts you to b

r permission!

cted

80:

drivomplicated c

comfort zon

ormance dri

ct – usually

t deal with t

in or perfo

hey want is

. In my earl

produce

my

. My driver r

a passenger.

rity so I co

vise authori

benefit of T

most they c

II helps th

attitude.

gative is

wh

get shifted

recommen

evel. Your b

ormance rati

ing done whi

ted to do in t

ce! This

the upfr

nding is

t

to

p later proble

is the o

of

ance at w

as individu

and how m

s Get People

es

ny

a

If

er,

an

es.

er

by

is,

rm

ot

ier

TV

le

I

ld

ty,

he

an

m

en

or

a

ss

ng

ch

he

is

nt

so

re‐

s.

ne

ur

rk

ls.

ch

say

decisi

negat

autho

level

happ

a sen

retre

empl

Emot

There

probl

to bei

Thes

page.

respodo th

be c

origin

disres

Effec

dyna

enga

only

comp

Perfo

probl

abou

Figur

Figur

nto the Same

e get is th

ons being m

ive, go arou

rity, show u

of quality, o

ned. They

se of

outrag

t into sull

yment opt

ional and p

may even

ms that are

ng effective

symptoms

Deeply hel

nses

that

areings around

mplex and

al core issue

pected and o

ive mid‐lev

ic and what

ement with

26% of em

liant while

mance Driver

ms are ca

who gets to

e 2: Driver an

e 3: Driver an

Page Joh

root cause

ade by other

d the middl

late or be a

r put a half ‐

ay use infla

over

the

de

n complian

ions. Mu

ysical stress

be personal

unrelated to

ith someone

ake it hard t

d beliefs an

anchored

in

ere.” A pow

demoralizing

at stake oft

ffended, bec

l managers

to do. Gallu

over one m

loyees feel

9% are act

s explains

wh

sed by a d

decide. The f

d Passenger

d Passenger

www.perfor

Kuypers ©2

. A person

s can becom

manager to

bsent, do a b

truth spin o

matory lang

ision, or

the

ce while s

tual respec

symptoms

reasons be

ork, adding

.

get people

values trig

cultural

norr play may s

. Most im

n gets lost

ming diseng

need to un

research on

illion surveys

fully engage

ively diseng

y and

what

t

river‐passen

llowing char

are in conflic

are stuck at

anceshift.co

09 Page

who dislike

e critical an

subvert thei

are‐minimu

n what reall

uage, expres

y may

quietl

eking othe

plummets

ften surface

hind attitud

complication

nto the sam

er emotiona

s

of

“how

wet in that ca

ortantly, th

s people fee

ged.

derstand thi

US employe

reveals tha

d. 55% ar

ged. The

do. Attitud

er mismatc

s reveal why:

t at >100%

100%

.

.

l

l



The

Fig

the

is

vac

evi

eve

Th

str

Wit

typ

rel

diff

Co

lea

maont

littl

sup

tea

tips

oth

atti

Th

sid

atti

ma

acc

upf

ma

the

Per

7 Performan

re 2 shows

passenger b

ure to follo

uum where

ence that t

ryone

involv

7PDs helps

ggling to get

h only one c

e, there is a

tionship. N

icult!

mitting to a

er for Step I

nagers

take

o the same p

e things that

port and dev

m’s success.

and techni

ers. It also

tude issues.

great dan

tracked by

tude proble

nagement, I

ept their

ront , they ar

ny middle m

organizatio

ormance Dri

e Drivers: Ho

n authority

th want a hig

w. Figure

o one wants

hings are st

d.

iddle mana

on the same

rrect matchi

86% proba

o wonder

new agreed‐

II: The Lift.

ction

to

aligage. Action

great leader

elop new be

Who’s The D

ues for influ

rovides a to

his tool is ca

ger for mi

the many r

ms.

After

believe that

ecision‐maki

not likely to

nagers quit

and even t

vers provide

w Effective Mi

verlap wher

h level of con

3 shows a

to decide.

uck, causing

ers understa

page with so

ng passenger

ility of confl

anaging pe

upon power r

his is where

everyone,

teans doing

do to enco

aviours and s

river Anywa

encing beha

ol for analyz

led W.I.N. At

ddle manag

ed herrings

thirty yea

unless you

ng authorit

accept it. T

r are fired, a

o their own

s a means t

ddle Manager

the driver a

rol. Resistan

ecision‐maki

o action is t

frustration

d why they

meone at wo

for each dri

ict in any w

ple can be

atio sets up t

ffective mid

at

is,

get

th he hundreds

rage, reinfor

kills vital to t

provides thi

iour change

ing and solvi

itude.

ers is to

arising out

s in

busin

get people

expectatio

is is the reas

t a high cost

careers. Th

o resolve c

s Get People

nd

ce

ng

he

or

re

rk.

er

rk

so

he

le

m

of

e,

he

rty

in

ng

et

of

ss

to

ns

on

to

7

re

issues

resol

perso

party’

Nothi

agree

Most

mean

get t

betw

gives

*****

John helpin

He is Consu

books includ

publis

in Bur

Cont

www

www

nto the Same

and not tak

tion may be

n’s core valu

’s plans, may

ng lasts fo

ment to part

importantly,

s to resolve

hings done.

en a rock a

hope for the

***********

Kuypers is g companies the founder

lting. John i on leadershi ing Who’s hed by www.

lington, Cana

raining: a v

oaching:

uality Impr

eam Respo

ulture Shift

eynote Spe

he Book:

hift To A Col

ct John at: j

.performanc

.whosthedri

Page Joh

e things pers

possible. De

es and belief

result in en

rever and

may be a wis

The 7 Perfo

differences,

For midd

nd a hard pl

oughest role

************ culture shi

grow to the nof Performa

s the author and person

The Driver carswell.com Ja.

The co

collaborati

Elements i

ariety of pro

evelop high

ovement: B

nsibilities: R

: Build a coll

eches: For

ho’s The D

laborative Te

hnk@perfo

shift.com

eranyway.c

www.perfor

Kuypers ©2

onally. In so

cisions that

s, or do not

ing the wor

coming to

choice for al

rmance Drive

et on the sa

le managers

ace, it defin

in managem

******* t expert ext level. nce Shift of three l change Anyway? ohn lives

pany off

e leadershi

clude:

ressive pro

performance

etter proces

oles, accoun

aborative te

eetings & c

iver Anyway

am Culture (

manceshift.

m

anceshift.co

09 Page

me cases, n

onflict with

fit into eithe

relationship

an amicabl

l involved.

rs provides

me page an

sandwiche

s reality an

nt.

ers severa

p programs

rams

leaders

es and

tools

tabilities

m culture

nferences

? Making Th

hapters.ca)

om

.

l

.

how effective middle managers get people onto the same page

Documents