how do humans make a living? part i: hunter gatherers february 16, 2005
TRANSCRIPT
“Primitives”
• Hobbes: “Nasty, brutish and short”• Rousseau: “Noble savage”
• Anthropologists avoid:– Primitive, advanced, savage, stages,
tribes
Teleological Models
• Great Chain of Being– God– Angels– Humans (Culture)– Mammals– Other animals– Plants (Nature)– Rocks– Dirt
Teleological Models
• Colonial explorers categorized people in the same way:– Light skinned, upper class Europeans– Poor (ethnic) Europeans (Slavs,
Mediterraneans)– Dark skinned farmers– Dark Skinned hunter gatherers– Great apes
Stages of Culture
• Edward Tyler: Primitive Culture (1871)– Civilization (Present)
– Barbarism
– Savagery (Distant past)
Technology
Category• Civilization• Upper Barbarism• Middle Barbarism• Lower Barbarism• Upper Savagery• Middle Savagery• Lower Savagery
TechnologyAlphabet, writingIron toolsFarming, herdingPotteryBow and ArrowFishing, ForagingNo technology
Cultural Evolutionism
• State• Chiefdom• Tribe• Band
• Increasing social complexity• Based on political/social/economic
characteristics
Bands
• Hunter-gatherers• Small, less than 100 individuals• Linked by kinship and marriage• Size may fluctuate• Egalitarian
Why not teleology?
• Implies that some people don’t have history (living relics, etc.)
• Change is not always unilinear
• Assumes that “primitive” people are isolated from modern world
Human Ecology
• Subsistence strategy as behavioral adaptation
• Making a living in the easiest way in a given environment
• Modern foragers may be analogous to ancient foragers (human ancestors)
Optimal Foraging Theory
• Resource value=energy value -handling cost (Calories)
• Reasons for not following model:– Show off factor– Nutrients, not just Calories
Conservation?
• If foragers were conservationists, they would kill only adult male animals.
• If not, they would exploit resources following optimal foraging theory.
Potlatch
• Huge feasts of redistribution• Brings prestige for Organizer• Wasteful?• Cultural Ecology Interpretation