house system peoria notre dame high school. of the factors listed below – the one most likely to...
TRANSCRIPT
HOUSE SYSTEM
Peoria Notre Dame High School
Of the factors listed below – the one
most likely to predict success in life is? A. High ACT scores B. High School GPA C. Success in Co-Curricular activities D. Successful Parents
Of the factors listed below – the one
most likely to predict success in life is? A. High ACT scores B. High School GPA C. Success in Co-Curricular activities D. Successful Parents
2003 Study ACT University of Colorado
Students who participate in co-curricular activities have an average GPA that is how much higher than those who do not participate? (on a 4.0 scale) 1.0 higher .5 higher .25 higher .75 higher
Students who participate in co-curricular activities have an average GPA that is how much higher than those who do not participate? (on a 4.0 scale) 1.0 higher .5 higher .25 higher .75 higher
1985 Indiana University Study (3.05 GPA vs. 2.54)
What percentage of high school students report regularly using alcohol or drugs? 80 % 40% 20% 10%
What percentage of high school students report regularly using alcohol or drugs? 80 % 40% 20% 10%
What percentage of high school students active in co-curriculars report regularly using alcohol or drugs? 80 % 40% 20% 10%
What percentage of high school students active in co-curriculars report regularly using alcohol or drugs? 80 % 40% 20% 10% (12% NSDUH Report SAMSA 2007)
What percentage of PND students fail drug tests? 31 % 24% 13% 2%
What percentage of PND students fail drug tests? 31 % 24% 13% 2% (1.9% 18 positives out of 906 )
Goals of House System
Increase student participation in life of school
Increase sense of pride in our PND community
Increase power of mentoring relationships between faculty/ students, and student / student
Origin
Based off British Boarding School System Enacted by Australian Christian Brother
High Schools Enacted by U.S. Christian Brother High
Schools First in U.S. St. Louis Chaminade
Our dilemma?
Finding structure we like for the advisory system for the trimester implementation year
Falling numbers in co-curricular participation Overscheduled Children Financial Considerations Time Considerations
What is the House System?
Restructures school into six houses (150 students in each house)
Students blended Freshmen, Sophomore, Juniors, Seniors
Two lead teachers from each house 6 Advisory periods within each house
Structure
2 Lead teachers from each house (1 male 1 female)
6 houses Names usually tied to the history of the
school Sheen, Viator, Benedict, Rice, Marian,
Carondelet 6 advisory periods in each house
Time structure 2010-2011
Period 1 8:30-9:35 Period 2 9:40-10:45 Period 3 10:50-11:55
11:55-11:59 report to advisory Lunch / Advisory
Lunch A: 11:59-12:23 Lunch B: 12:23 – 12:47 Lunch C: 12:47 – 1:11
Period 4 1:15 – 2:20 Period 5 2:25 – 3:30
True or False: Every teacher currently has a lunch period that is the same length?
True or False: Every teacher currently has a lunch period that is the same length?
FALSE
Lunch time comparisons
Lunch 5A has 28 minutes Lunch 5B has 24 minutes Lunch 6A has 28 minutes Lunch 6b has 24 minutes
Student Empowerment
Students work more closely with faculty in planning of activities etc. Example
Intramural House charged with the task of organizing
intramural basketball during the winter trimester. Teachers and students in house work together to
cover the planning and details
Measures of Success?
Improves quality of student experience See improvement on student satisfaction
surveys Increase participation in school wide
events Increase faculty involvement in
planning / decision / leadership
Related changes:
Reformulates leadership team Use of class moderators vs. activity
stipend Student Government reformulated Student Support Groups by House