hott 2.0 revisions alan saunders

27/4/2014 The Stronghold Rebuilt: HOTT 2.0 - My House Rules

http://hordesofthethings.blogspot.tw/2013/12/hott-20-my-house-rules.html 1/4

Home Free Stuff Links HOTT FAQ

SUNDAY, 22 DECEMBER 2013

HOTT 2.0 - My House Rules

I have a reputation for being a bit of a HOTT purist. And it's true; I like HOTT

2.0 pretty much as it is. I don't advocate for adding new troop types and I don't

really feel that it needs new mechanisms to make it work. I'm generally happy

to play it as it's written. No set of rules is perfect, after all, and if they work, and

give sensible results and an entertaining game, 95% of the time, I'm happy.

There are no perfect rules, after all.

However I have tried out fixes and variants, and over time some of them have

become more or less permanent features of my games, or at least the ones I

play in the comfort of my own home. You could call them House Rules ...

Some of them have been described elsewhere on this blog, but I thought that it would be

interesting to put them all in one place for other people to see.

So, here they are:

(i) Sneaker. There are probably as many Sneaker fixes as there are people thinking that a fix for

Sneakers is needed. Mine simply adjusts existing rules, rather than adding anything new. Put

simply, a Sneaker is allowed to break off from an enemy element by moving forward through it,

nad the restriction on which elements they can 'friction kill' is lifted. In rules terms this translates

to:

Page 24, under 'Recoiling'

2nd paragraph, 1st bullet point - delete last sentence

"If all such enemy are sneakers .... if it is a general"

Page 18, under 'Breaking Off From Close Combat'

1st paragraph - amend from

"A single element can use a tactical move to break off from enemy in contactwith its front, but

only if all of the following apply:"

to

"A single element can use a tactical move to break off from enemy in contactwith its front, but

only if it is a Sneaker or if all of the following apply:"

2nd paragraph - amend start from

"An element breaking off must move at least 200p ... "

to

"Unless a sneaker, an element breaking off must move at least 200p ..."

(ii) Water Lurkers. Essentially, I don't use them any more. THIS POST describes how this

change works.

(iii) Random Terrain Positioning. The first thing I latched onto when I saw DBA 3.0 was the way

terrain was positioned. It has been said by a few players that terrain placement in HOTT can be

little samey after a while, as well as being open to abuse, and I wondered if the DBA system

could help alleviate this. Eventually I came up with THIS.

(iv) Clerics. A simple addition. Clerics are the only element that can force a God to flee the field,

Officially a blog about 'Hordes Of

The Things', the excellent fast-

play fantasy miniatures rules from

WRG. But expect minor, and not

so minor diversions into other

games as well, as my

grasshopper-like mind leaps from

one cool thing to another.

Over time I will publish choice

pieces from the old Stronghold.

THE STRONGHOLD - REBUILT

+13 Recommend this on Google

2014 (78)

2013 (186)

December (12)

HOTT On The Road ToMoscow

8e Cuirassiers - Trial Run

Christmas Loot

Lego Micro-Military

HOTT 2.0 - My House Rules

Last Stand!

Over The Front

The Italian Attack On Sollum

Monocacy (9th July 1864) -A Longstreet Game

Weird World War II -Painting Progress

Somewhere In Russia - 1812

My Dice Rant

November (10)

October (14)

September (18)

August (26)

July (9)

June (11)

May (17)

April (20)

March (20)

February (11)

January (18)

2012 (192)

BLOG ARCHIVE

Share 0 More Next Blog [email protected] Dashboard Sign Out



Posted by Kaptain Kobold at 13:00

Labels: hott, rules, variants

Random TerrainFor HOTT

HOTT - WaterLurkers

Terrain In HOTTCampaigns

but who cannot actually contact the God in the first place. So, I allow Clerics to move into contact

with Gods. This gives them a little more value for their 3AP. Games show that, despite the

disparity between the movement and manoeuvrability of a God and a Cleric, they can use, or

threaten to use, this ability more than you might think.

(v) Paladins. Heroes and Paladins can both contact aerials But, for some reason, only a Hero

can destroy a Flier in close combat; even if doubled by a Paladin, a Flier only flees. I suspect that

this is an omission (rather like the one which, in HOTT 10, meant that Beasts got a -2 fighting an

enemy element that was in bad going). So - a Flier is destroyed by a Paladin if doubled.

(vi) Big Battles. In big battles we have found that a victorious flank command can't really move

quickly enough to exploit its success and support the rest of the army. So in big battles elements

we allow elements to march move. That is, and element, or group of elements, can make

multiple moves, so long as no move after the first starts, ends or goes within 600p of an enemy

element. Normal PIP costs apply for each move.

As you can see, there are few genuine additions, and only one section which is radically changed

(Terrain). They all need more testing and play, although so far I've not detected any major flaws.

And no new troop types - indeed I effectively drop one ...

You might also like:

Linkwithin

Recommend this on Google

Replies

Reply

7 comments:

Chasseur 23 December 2013 07:04

Looks like a sensible list of additions. We're due to play a big battle so might try out the

march moves.

Reply

Kaptain Kobold 23 December 2013 18:03

Oddly we haven't found the march moves having a huge effect on games yet, but

it's nice to know they're there. They're actually more useful in the early, approach,

stages of the battle, rather than later in the game - they allow flanking moves,

chances to seize terrain with advanced parties and the ability to keep troops with

different move rates together for the first bound's advance.

GTX 30 December 2013 03:07

As you say, the perfect set of rules doesn't exist (HOTT/DBA are the closest I've come

across), but that may be because we wargamers love to tweak them! However, your ideas

look like all good suggestions to me and I'll look forward to including them in my next game.

For their cost, sneakers still don't seem good value though. Do you think sneakers should

suffer the -2 for bad going? I've always been puzzled that when aerials are in close combat

with each other, ground troops can enter the combat, seems odd, what do you reckon?

Reply

Search

SEARCH THIS BLOG

acw (38) aeronef (9)aircraft (24) ancients

(23) army showcase (9)

battle cry

(16)

black powder (12)

epic40k (15)

ganesha

games (11) general (46) giantmonster rampage (10) gladiators

(23) gong con

(11) gong con 2013 (8) gonggarage gamers (120)

heroclix (8)

hott (154) kaiju(29) lace wars (29)

liberation (16) lists (30)maurice (28)

mexican

adventure (8)

moab

(10)

munera sine missione (19)

napoleonics (10)

painting (62) portable

wargame (15)

report (223) rules (25)

spandau and lewis (18)

steampunk (9)

superhero (27)

variants

(14)

Weird World War II (14) ww1 (32)ww2 (13)

LABELS

a hotter f ire (1)

age of sail (3)

anime (1) art

(4) aw ard (1) barsoom (7)

battlegroup kursk (1) battlesworn (3)

birthday (3) bkc (1)

blitzkrieg commander (5) blood on the

sands (1) boardgames (3) bolt action

(2) book (4) brigadier general (1)

campaign (6) cancon (1) chaco w ar (1)

charioteer (5) christmas (1) cinema (3)

clobberin' time (5) cold war

commander (2) colonial (2) comic gong

(1) comics (1) cwc (2) danger patrol (1)

dba (3) dbm (1) dbmm (1) dice (1) doctor

who (4) facebook (1)

falklands conflict (1) family (1) fantasy (2)

fcbd (1) f igures (1) filibusters (3) film (2)

flames of war (2) form line of battle (3)

full thrust (2) FWC (3)

glorantha (1) GNW (5)

hail caesar (2) holiday (3)

hott. lists (1)

langton naval (1)

last stand (1) lego (5) LGBT (3)

links (5)

longstreet (6) medieval

(2) meme (3) memoir44 (7)

mexican revolution (5)

middle earth (3) mighty mean fowt

fights (7) mighty monsters (5)

modelling (7) monster island (2)

morschauser rules (4) movie (2)

museum

(1) mythology (5)

narnia (3) naval (7) news (3) obituary

(2) paper figures (7)

photography (3) pictures (4)

principles of w ar (1) pz8

(3) rant (1) review

(4) rpg (7) saga (3) salute

(1) scenario (7) scif i (1) show (3) songs

of blades and heroes (5) spaceships

(6)

strongholds (1)

struggle against everything and

everybody (5) terrain

(2) theatre (1) thw (5) tournament (4)

trafalgar (1) tv (1) variant (2)

void and stars (5) w alker (1)

zombies (1)

Army Showcase -Sundiata

How long does ittake to paint a HOTTarmy? Well, I've

done it in a day, that's for sure.But the one I've just finished hastak...

POPULAR THIS WEEK



Replies

Reply


"Do you think sneakers should suffer the -2 for bad going?"

I'm still pondering that. It screws them up badly when facing mounted or aerials,

but keeps numbers constant with regard to other foot. Dropping the penalty would

leave them at a +5 in bad going - not even a Hero gets that. Rather than drop the

-2, I'd up their factors against mounted. But I'm not into changing combat factors,

so I'm unlikely to try it myself.

With the changes I use they are a lit more use for their 3AP than you might think -

you just have to work out *how* to use them effectively.

" I've always been puzzled that when aerials are in close combat with each other,

ground troops can enter the combat, seems odd, what do you reckon?"

Not at all. From a mechanism point of view it keeps the rules simple and prevents

aerials from becoming too hard to engage. Consider it being your aerials forcing

the fight down to an altitude where ground troops can get involved if you want to

rationalise it (but don't confuse how you rationalise a rule with the rule itself).

GTX 31 December 2013 05:06

You're probably right, as I've never used sneakers (didn't think they were worth

3AP) perhaps it's a case of knowing how to use them effectively. Any tips?

Perhaps you could do a piece of how to effectively use the more specialist

elements to get good value for their higher cost...?

I do like to rationalise things. The idea that ground troops can get involved in an

aerial combat situation is a concept I struggle with, although I take your point

about possibly forcing them down to a lower altitude. I appreciate that it makes

aerials easier to engage, but still...odd. When you say 'don't confuse how you

rationalise a rule with the rule itself' I'm not sure what you mean. I would be

grateful if you could perhaps elaborate further, it may help me become more

comfortable when faced with what seems an odd rule. Thanks.


"When you say 'don't confuse how you rationalise a rule with the rule itself' I'm not

sure what you mean."

The rule is that aerials in close combat can be contacted by enemy elements, and

that is how it should always be explained. Sometimes people quote the rule as

being 'Aerials force other aerials down to ground level', which is not what is said -

that's just how some of us choose to rationalise it.

Excluding aerial vs aerial combats from being contacted by ground elements

would also create extra wording for very little gain in the game. At the end of the

day it works, and it keeps aerials from becoming too powerful (try an army with a

limited capacity to engage aerials against one with a couple of Airboats and Flyers

- then see how useful the ability to pin them in combat so that other elements can

then take part becomes :) )

GTX 1 January 2014 04:56

Thanks, I see what you mean.

I suppose if you limit of the number of aerials to avoid such a scenario that might

be one way of dealing with it. But as you say, at the end of the day it works for

people...

Once again thanks and keep up the good work. Happy New Year!

Sundiata vs TheIrish

A new army needs adebut game, andsince Sundiata is

now sharing a box with the TuathaDe Danaan, it seemed assensible a game as any. The...

Kalevala in 'Hordesof the Things'

Kalevala is an epicpoem, compiled inthe 19th century

from the oral myths and folklore ofFinland. Most of Kalekavarevolves around V...

Guilfoyle, Wackettand Turner

With our club nightfalling on the daybefore ANZAC Day, I

thought I'd put together a small'Spandau and Lewis' scenariofeaturi...

Join this sitew ith Google Friend Connect

Members (151) More

Already a member? Sign in

FOLLOWERS

Show All

MY BLOG LIST

The Duchy ofTradgardlandMilitary cycling- 26thMiddlesex cyclists18 minutes ago

CinemascopeThe Sniper [1952]1 hour ago

Angry people in localnewspapersUKIP green belt anger1 hour ago

Men In BoxesMythic Clash1 hour ago

DROPSHIP HORIZONMr. Harold's Magical MiniatureReview - 15mm.co.uk ModernTents3 hours ago

Kaptain Kobold

ABOUT ME



Newer Post Older PostHome

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Sign out

Notify me

Enter your comment...

Comment as: Unknown (Google)

Publish

Preview

Create a Link

Links to this post

Wargaming UK Ex-pat in

Wollongong, Australia. Married

with two children, two cats, and

two wardrobes.

View my complete profile

Email me at kaptainkobold at

yahoo dot co dot uk

Actually a search on

'kaptainkobold' will find me just

about anywhere.

CONTACT

243,036

TOTAL PAGEVIEWS

INSTAGRAM - THIS IS NO GAME

Follow @kaptainkobold

Picture Window template. Template images by Airyelf. Powered by Blogger.

hott 2.0 revisions alan saunders

Documents

enemy element

perfect rules

hott purist

set of rules

existing rules

sneaker fixes

house ruleshttp

house rulesi