Honors Geometry Section 4.3

AAS / RHL

In the last section we learned of three triangle congruence postulates:

SSS SAS ASA

Let’s look at some other possibilities.

A counterexample demonstrates that AAA is not a valid test for congruence. Consider

two equiangular triangles. What is true about the angles in each triangle?

Are the triangles shown congruent?

They are all 60 degrees.

No

5050

If we know the measures of two angles in a triangle, we will always be able to find the measure of the third

angle.

So, any time we have the AAS combination, we can change it into the ASA combination and the two triangles will then be congruent.

Theorem 4.3.1 AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) Congruence Theorem

If two angles and the non-included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding parts of another

triangle, then the triangles are congruent.

Note: While ASA can be used anytime AAS can be used and vice-

versa, they are different. The congruence markings on your triangles and the steps in your

proof must agree with the congruence postulate/theorem

you use.

Example: Are the triangles congruent, and if so, why?

AAS ASA

As discussed in the last class, SSA is not a valid test for triangle

congruence.

There is, however, a special case of SSA that is a valid test for triangle

congruence.

Theorem 4.3.2 RHL (Right-Hypotenuse-Leg) Congruence Theorem

If the hypotenuse and a leg of one right triangle are congruent to the

hypotenuse and a leg of a second right triangle, then the two triangles are

congruent.

NOTE: In a right triangle, the legs are the two sides that form the

right angle and the hypotenuse is the side opposite the right angle.

Example 3: Name the congruent triangles and give the reason for their congruence. None is a possible answer.

NONE FEIKEN

ASAor AAS

RHL

CAFCAL