hoisington the fed vs the 30 year treasury (2012 oct)

Upload: casefortrils

Post on 03-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    1/25

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    2/25

    page 1

    90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 '00'01'02'03'04'05'06'07'08'09 10 '11'12

    0.5%

    1.5%

    2.5%

    3.5%

    4.5%

    5.5%

    6.5%

    7.5%

    8.5%

    9.5%

    0.5%

    1.5%

    2.5%

    3.5%

    4.5%

    5.5%

    6.5%

    7.5%

    8.5%

    9.5%

    Long Term Treasury Rate

    Source: Federal Reserve. Through September 2012. Annual average for 2012 is

    the twelve month average ending in September.

    203 bps

    92 bps

    117 bps

    69 bps

    197 bps

    76 bps

    Annual

    average

    (blue line)

    Monthly

    average

    (black line)

    151 bps

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    3/25

    page 2

    1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

    100%

    120%

    140%

    160%

    180%

    200%

    220%

    240%260%

    280%

    300%

    320%

    340%

    360%380%

    400%

    100%

    120%

    140%

    160%

    180%

    200%

    220%

    240%260%

    280%

    300%

    320%

    340%

    360%380%

    400%

    U.S. Private and Public Debt as a % of GDPannually

    Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Federal Reserve, Census Bureau: Historical Statistics of the United States

    Colonial Times to 1970. Through Q2 2012.

    Panic Year 2008

    Panic Year 1873

    Panic Year 1929

    1870-1997 avg. = 167.2%

    1870-2011 avg. = 183.3%

    Current total debt = $55.2 trillion

    Debt/GDP of 183.3% would require total debt of $28.6 trillion

    Debt/GDP of 167.2% would require total debt of $26.1 trillion

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    4/25

    page 3

    52 59 66 73 80 87 94 '01 '08

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    -1

    -2

    -3

    tril.

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    -1

    -2

    -3

    tril.

    Nonfederal Debt and Federal Debtchange from a year ago, quarterly

    Source: Federal Reserve Board. Through Q2 2012.

    Nonfederal

    Federal

    52 59 66 73 80 87 94 '01 '08

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    -1

    -2

    tril.

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    -1

    -2

    tril.

    Total Debt

    change from a year ago, quarterly

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    5/25

    page 4

    Total Public and Private Debt as a % of GDP

    Major Countriesannual

    Source: Bank of Japan, Cabinet Office, Statistics Canada, Federal Reserve, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Office for

    National Statistics of U.K., Statistical Office of the European Communities, Reserve Bank of Australia.

    1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011

    100%

    200%

    300%

    400%

    500%

    600%

    700%

    100%

    200%

    300%

    400%

    500%

    600%

    700%

    Japan

    U.S.

    Australia

    Eurozone

    U.K.

    Canada

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    6/25

    page 5

    2010 2011 2012 % of World GDP

    1 Canada 85.1% 87.8% 92.8% 2.4%2 France 95.2% 98.6% 102.4% 4.3%

    3 Germany 87.1% 86.9% 87.3% 5.8%

    4 Italy 126.1% 127.7% 128.1% 3.4%

    5 Japan 200.0% 211.7% 219.1% 8.8%

    6 United Kingdom 82.2% 90.0% 97.2% 4.5%

    7 United States 94.2% 97.6% 103.6% 25.5%

    8 OECD Euro area (15countries)

    92.9% 95.6% 97.9% 26.0%

    9 China 2011: 8.0%

    75% of World

    GDP

    10

    Officially reported

    government debt to

    GDP

    16

    11 Hidden liabilities 144.0%

    12Total debt including

    hidden liabilities160.0%

    Source: McKinsey Global Institute,

    OECD Economic Outlook No. 90, OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (database). World Bank, USDA.

    (% of world GDP in real 2005 dollars.)

    General Government Gross Financial Liabilities

    as a % of GDP

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    7/25

    page 6

    Consistent with other more recent research, the authors confirm that public debt overhang

    episodes are associated with growth over one percent lower than during other periods....duration of the average debt overhang episode across all 26 episodes lasted an average of 23

    years. ...Growth effects are significant even in the many episodes where debtor countries were

    able to secure continual access to capital markets at relatively low real interest rates. That is,

    growth-reducing effects of high public debt are apparently not transmitted exclusively through

    high real interest rates.

    The long duration belies the view that the correlation is caused mainly by debt buildups during

    business cycle recessions. The long duration also implies that cumulative shortfall in output fromdebt overhang is potentially massive.

    "At the end of 23 years...Real GDP is 24 percent lower than for the baseline. It is not exactly what

    T.S. Eliot had in mind when he wrote This is the way the world ends, Not with a bang but a

    whimper but the general thrust appears to be applicable to the debt-without-drama damages.

    This research documents the first systematic evidence on the association between high public debt

    and real interest rates. They write: Contrary to popular perception, we find that in 11 of the 26

    debt overhang cases, real interest rates were either lower or about the same as during the lower

    debt/GDP years. Those waiting for financial markets to send the warning signal through higher

    interest rates that government policy will be detrimental to economic performance may be waiting

    a long time.

    Carmen M. Reinhart, Vincent R. Reinhart, Kenneth S. Rogoff, National Bureau of Economic

    Research, working paper 18015.

    Debt Overhangs: Past and PresentPost 1800 Episodes Characterized by Public Debt to GDP Levels Exceeding

    90% for At Least Five Years.

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    8/25

    page 7

    Any conflict between the size of government and economic growth is largely

    explained by variations in definitions and the countries studied. Bergh and

    Henrekson write, An alternative approach - of limiting the focus to studies

    of the relationship in rich countries, measuring government size as total taxes

    or total expenditure relative to GDP and relying on panel data estimations

    with variation over time - reveals a more consistent picture... Bergh andHenrekson find a significant negative correlation. Specifically, an

    increase in government size by 10 percentage points is associated with a 0.5%

    to 1% lower annual growth rate.

    Government Size and Growth: A Survey and Interpretation of the

    Evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys. Andreas Bergh, ResearchInstitute of Industrial Economics (IFN) Lund University. Magnus

    Henrekson, Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN) Lund

    University. April 2011. Page 2.

    Government Size and Growth

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    9/25

    page 8

    Checherita and Rother investigated the average effect of government debt on per capita GDP growth in

    twelve euro area countries over a period of about four decades beginning in 1970. They confirm and

    extend the finding by Reinhart and Rogoff in their 2010 NBER paper. A government debt to GDP ratio

    above the turning point of 90-100% has a deleterious impact on long-term growth. In addition, they

    find that there is a non-linear impact of debt on growth beyond this turning point. A non-linear

    relationship means that as the government debt rises to higher and higher levels, the adverse growth

    consequences accelerate. Results across all models show a highly statistically significant non-linear

    relationship between the government debt ratio and per-capita GDP for the 12 pooled euro area

    countries included in their sample.

    Moreover, confidence intervals for the debt turning point suggest that the negative growth rate effect of

    high debt may start from levels of around 70-80% of GDP. Due to these findings, Checherita and

    Rother write this calls for even more prudent indebtedness policies. Checherita and Rother make a

    substantial further contribution by identifying the channels through which the level and change of

    government debt is found to have an impact on economic growth: (1) private saving, (2) publicinvestment, (3) total factor productivity and (4) sovereign long-term nominal and real interest rates.

    Cristina Checherita and Philipp Rother, The Impact of High and Growing Government Debt on

    Economic Growth, An Empirical Investigation for The Euro Area, European Central Bank

    working paper, Number 1237, August 2010.

    The Impact of High and Growing

    Government Debt on Economic Growth

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    10/25

    page 9

    We contribute to the intense debate on the real effects of fiscal stimuli by

    showing that the impact of government expenditure shocks depends

    crucially on key country characteristics, such as the level of development,exchange rate regime, openness to trade, and public indebtedness Based

    on a novel quarterly dataset of government expenditure in 44 countries,

    we find that (i) the output effect of an increase in government

    consumption is larger in industrial than in developing countries, (ii) the

    fiscal multiplier is relatively large in economies operating under

    predetermined exchange rate but zero in economies operating underflexible exchange rates; (iii) fiscal multipliers in open economies are

    lower than in closed economies and (iv) fiscal multipliers in high-debt

    countries are also zero.

    IMF Working Paper

    How Big (Small?) are Fiscal Multipliers?Prepared by Ethan Ilzetzki, Enrique G. Mendoza and Carlos A. Vegh

    March 2011

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    11/25

    page 10

    Real GDP per capita Real DPI per capita

    1. Current 12 quarters 1.6% 0.2%

    2. Post war high 6.0% 4.5%

    3. Post war low 1.8% 1.1%

    4. Post war average 3.4% 2.9%

    Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, HIMCO. Through Q2 2012.

    Post WWII Expansions 12 quarter % change a.r.

    Symptoms of Extreme Overindebtedness

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    12/25

    page 11

    QE1Change

    No QE QE2Change

    No QE W.S.J.QE3

    1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

    1. S&P 500 36.4% -9.0% 24.1% -5.6% 6.8%

    2. Gasoline 30.3% -8.6% 36.8% -5.5% 19.1%

    3. GSCI-Food 7.1% 19.1% 21.7% -5.5% 18.7%

    Source: Federal Reserve, Bloomberg, Haver Analytics, NYMEX, Standard and Poors.

    (Column 5 is from June 20 through Sept. 30, 2012.)

    Quantitative Easing: Critical Market Values

    Positive Responders to Inflation/Risk

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    13/25

    page 12

    '00 '04 '08 '12

    0%

    1%

    2%

    3%

    4%

    5%

    6%

    7%

    -1%

    -2%

    -3%

    0%

    1%

    2%

    3%

    4%

    5%

    6%

    7%

    -1%

    -2%

    -3%

    Consumer Price Indexy-o-y percent change, monthly

    Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Through August 2012.

    QE1 begins

    QE2 ends

    QE2 begins

    QE1 ends

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    14/25

    page 13

    '00 '04 '08 '12

    0%

    1%

    2%

    3%

    4%

    5%

    6%

    7%

    -1%

    -2%

    -3%

    0%

    1%

    2%

    3%

    4%

    5%

    6%

    7%

    -1%

    -2%

    -3%

    Real Average Hourly Earningsy-o-y percent change, monthly

    Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Through August 2012.

    QE1 begins

    QE2 ends

    QE2 begins

    QE1 ends

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    15/25

    page 14

    Real Median Household Incomeannual

    1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011

    40

    41

    4243

    44

    45

    46

    47

    4849

    50

    51

    52

    53

    5455

    56Thousands

    40

    41

    4243

    44

    45

    46

    47

    4849

    50

    51

    52

    53

    5455

    56Thousands

    Sources: Census Bureau. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Through 2011.

    Lowest since 1995

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    16/25

    page 15

    The Aggregate Demand Curve;

    Real GDP varies inversely with the Price Level

    Price Level

    P0

    Real GDP0

    P1

    Y1 Y0

    AD0

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    17/25

    page 16

    Determinants of the Aggregate Demand Curve

    Price Level

    Real GDP0

    AD=GDPGDP=M2*VM2=Monetary Base*mAD=Monetary Base*m*V

    AD1

    AD0

    AnoutwardshiftinthedemandcurveraisespricesandincreasesGDP

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    18/25

    page 17

    '08 '09 '10 '11 '12

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    2000

    2200

    2400

    2600

    2800bil.

    M2 Money Multiplier and the Monetary Basemonthly

    Source: Federal Reserve. Through Oct. 3, 2012. M2m through Oct. 1. (Multiplier is ratio of M2 to the

    monetary base.) The money multiplier or m is determined by the currency, time deposit, Treasury deposit

    and excess reserve ratios.

    Monetary Base:

    right scale

    thick line

    M2 money

    multiplier:

    left scale thin line

    9.3

    3.9

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    19/25

    page 18

    90 94 98 '02 '06 '10

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12tril.

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12tril.

    Bank Loans plus Commercial Papermonthly

    Source: Federal Reserve Board. Through 1st week in October 2012.

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    20/25

    page 19

    Source: Federal Reserve. Through October 1, 2012.

    '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 2 2

    0%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%

    10%

    12%

    14%

    16%

    18%

    20%

    22%

    24%26%

    -2%

    0%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%

    10%

    12%

    14%

    16%

    18%

    20%

    22%

    24%

    26%

    -2%

    M2 Money Stock3 and 6 month % change, a.r. and

    y-o-y % change

    6 moy-o-y3 mo

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    21/25

    page 20

    Velocity of Money 1900-2012Equation of Exchange: GDP(nominal) = M*V

    annual

    1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

    1.00

    1.25

    1.50

    1.75

    2.00

    2.25

    1.00

    1.25

    1.50

    1.75

    2.00

    2.25

    Sources: Federal Reserve Board; Bureau of Economic Analysis;

    Bureau of the Census; Monetary Statistics of the United States. Through Q2 2012.

    Q2 2012; V = GDP/M, GDP = 15.6 tril, M2 = 9.9 tril, V = 1.57

    avg. 1900

    to present = 1.68

    1918 = 1.95

    1946 = 1.15

    1997 = 2.12

    1.57avg. 1953 to 1983 = 1.69

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    22/25

    page 21

    1929 1939 1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999 2009

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    -5%

    -10%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    -5%

    -10%

    Personal Saving Rateannual

    Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Through August 2012.

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    23/25

    page 22

    1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

    100%

    120%

    140%

    160%

    180%

    200%

    220%

    240%260%

    280%

    300%

    320%

    340%

    360%380%

    400%

    100%

    120%

    140%

    160%

    180%

    200%

    220%

    240%260%

    280%

    300%

    320%

    340%

    360%380%

    400%

    U.S. Private and Public Debt as a % of GDPannually

    Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Federal Reserve, Census Bureau: Historical Statistics of the United States

    Colonial Times to 1970. Through Q2 2012.

    Panic Year 2008

    Panic Year 1873

    Panic Year 1929

    1870-1997 avg. = 167.2%

    1870-2011 avg. = 183.3%

    Current total debt = $55.2 trillion

    Debt/GDP of 183.3% would require total debt of $28.6 trillion

    Debt/GDP of 167.2% would require total debt of $26.1 trillion

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    24/25

    page 23

    Long-Term Government Bond Yields Starting with

    Historic Panic Years: Japan 1989, U.S. 1873 and 1929annual average

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

    1%

    2%

    3%

    4%

    5%

    6%

    7%

    1%

    2%

    3%

    4%

    5%

    6%

    7%

    Sources: Federal Reserve Board, Homer & Sylla. Bank of Japan.

    U.S. 1929

    U.S. 1873

    Japan 1989

    U.S. panic year 1873 = year 1U.S. panic year 1929 = year 1

    Japan panic year 1989 = year 1

    1. Average low level of interest rates after panic 2.0%

    2.Average number of years after panic to lowest

    level of interest rates13.7 years

    3.Average level of interest rates 20 years after

    panic2.5%

    4.Change from low level of interest rates to 20th

    year0.5%

    Debt Induced Panic Years and

    Long-Term Government Bond

    Yields

    U.S. 2008

  • 7/28/2019 Hoisington the Fed vs the 30 Year Treasury (2012 Oct)

    25/25

    page 24

    Long Term Treasury Rate 1871-2012annual average

    1871 1891 1911 1931 1951 1971 1991 2011

    0%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%

    10%

    12%

    14%

    0%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%

    10%

    12%

    14%

    Sources: Federal Reserve Board, Homer & Sylla. Through September 2012. Initial global market period

    interrupted by WWI.

    avg. = 4.3%

    Onset of Iron and

    Bamboo Curtains

    Fall of Berlin Wall

    Global marketRestricted market

    Global

    market

    Interest rate avg. = 2.9%Inflation rate avg. = .9%

    Interest rate avg.= 6%

    Inflation rate avg.

    = 4%