hobbit survey results
TRANSCRIPT
HOBBITSurvey results
Ruben Taelman
Horizon 2020GA No 688227
01/12/2016–30/11/2018
ESWC 2016Crete, GreeceJune 22, 2016
Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 1 / 1
Goal
In what areas are organizations active?What do people expect from benchmarks?How are benchmarks being used?
Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 2 / 1
Participant profiles
50 participants
Profile CountSolution provider 39Technology user 39Scientific community 40
Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 3 / 1
Linked Data areas
Evenly distributed:Storage / QueryingInterlinkingClassification / EnrichmentDiscoveryExtractionReasoning
Solution providers mainly active in storage and querying.
Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 4 / 1
Linked Data areas
Other areas:ReportingVisualization
Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 5 / 1
Key performance indicators
CorrectnessAccuracy (precision, recall, F-measure, mean reciprocal rank)Runtime / SpeedScalabilityMemory usageCPU usage
Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 6 / 1
Benchmarks
48% already evaluates software using a benchmark78% of benchmarking done for storage and querying, much less for otherdomains
Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 7 / 1
Datasets
Types of datasets:22% synthetic data46% real data32% both
66% is or can be made public!
Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 8 / 1
Dataset sizes
Innumber of triples.
Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 9 / 1
Survey still open!
http://goo.gl/forms/1iRIoG4Xpb
Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 10 / 1